Search

Background: Pleural mesothelioma usually presents at an advanced, incurable stage. Chemotherapy with platinum-pemetrexed is a standard treatment. We hypothesised that the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum-pemetrexed would improve overall survival in patients with pleural mesothelioma., Methods: We did this open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial at 51 hospitals in Canada, Italy, and France. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with previously untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous chemotherapy (cisplatin [75 mg/m 2 ] or carboplatin [area under the concentration-time curve 5-6 mg/mL per min] with pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 , every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles), with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 2 years). The primary endpoint was overall survival in all randomly assigned patients; safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02784171, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Jan 31, 2017, and Sept 4, 2020, 440 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone (n=218) or chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (n=222). 333 (76 %) of patients were male, 347 (79%) were White, and median age was 71 years (IQR 66-75). At final analysis (database lock Dec 15, 2022), with a median follow-up of 16·2 months (IQR 8·3-27·8), overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab (median overall survival 17·3 months [95% CI 14·4-21·3] with pembrolizumab vs 16·1 months [13·1-18·2] with chemotherapy alone, hazard ratio for death 0·79; 95% CI 0·64-0·98, two-sided p=0·0324). 3-year overall survival rate was 25% (95% CI 20-33%) with pembrolizumab and 17% (13-24%) with chemotherapy alone. Adverse events related to study treatment of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 60 (27%) of 222 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 32 (15%) of 211 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. Hospital admissions for serious adverse events related to one or more study drugs were reported in 40 (18%) of 222 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 12 (6%) of 211 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. Grade 5 adverse events related to one or more drugs occurred in two patients on the pembrolizumab group and one patient in the chemotherapy alone group., Interpretation: In patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy was tolerable and resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival. This regimen is a new treatment option for previously untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma., Funding: The Canadian Cancer Society and Merck & Co., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MP has received grants for research to institution from AstraZeneca and Roche; payment for educational events from Astellas, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca; and received drugs for research from Roche and AstraZeneca. GLR received consulting fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Takeda, GSK, and Italfarmaco; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Takeda, GSK, and Italfarmaco; received support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, MSD, BMS, and Amgen; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Takeda, GSK, and Italfarmaco; and has other financial or non-financial interests from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Takeda, and GSK. YL holds stock or stock options from Merck. SL received consulting fees from Lilly, MSD, Sanofi, and AbbVie and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca. AS received grants or contracts (payments to institution) from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Amphera; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, and Roche; received support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, and Roche; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, and Roche. MF received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, and Takeda and received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, BMS, and Takeda. SAL has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Sanofi and Bayer. JRG received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca and BMS. PB received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Merck and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Mirati and AbbVie. NL has received editorial support from EMD Serono; received grants to institute (unrelated) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Guardant Health, Inivata, Janssen, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; received honoraria or travel funding for CME lectures (unrelated) from AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Takeda; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Mirati, Helsinn, and Daichii Sankyo. LS has received grants or contracts to institution to support clinical trial from AstraZeneca, Merck, Bayer, Novartis, Repare, GSK, and Janssen and holds stock or stock options from AstraZeneca. DED has received research grants from CIHR, CancerCare Manitoba Foundation, and AstraZeneca; received research grants and salary awards from Manitoba Medical Services Foundation; received payment for educational events from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and BMS; served on an advisory board for Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; has acted in a leadership or fiduciary role in a board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for Lung Cancer Canada (Medical Advisory Committee), Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (Chair, Fellowship Committee), and Canadian Cancer Trials Group (Chair, Small Cell Lung Cancer Working Group); and received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from AstraZeneca (Medical writing assistance on a small-cell lung cancer paper). QC has received grants to institution from Alkermes, Amgen, Apollomics, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bicycle, BMS, Conjupro, Decipher, Eli Lilly, Esperas, Exactis, GSK, iTEOS, Kelun, Merck, Mirati, Nuvalent, Ocellaris, Pfizer, Rvolution Medicines, Roche, SeaGen, Spectrum, and Treadwell; received consulting fees from Amgen, AnHeart, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck and Co, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; received payment for speaking or presentations from AstraZeneca; acted on an advisory board for Amgen, AnHeart, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck and Co, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; acted on a Data Safety Monitoring Committee for Merck and KGaA; and occupied a leadership or fiduciary role in a board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for Lung Cancer Canada and Canadian Mesothelioma Foundation. CWL has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Canadian Mesothelioma Foundation. LG received grants or contracts to institution from BMS, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen, Lilly, and Novartis; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen, Lilly, and Novartis; received support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Inhatarget Therapeutics. XQ received support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer (ESMO 2022), Janssen (ASCO 2022), and Sanofi (ASCO 2023). VW received consulting fees from Amgen; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche, and Sanofi; received support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Roche, and Sanofi; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Ipsen. GZ received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inventiva Pharma, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche; acted in a consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Da Volterra, Inventiva Pharma, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, and Roche; received research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and received travel, accommodations, and expenses from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. MLS received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS and support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer (ESMO 2022). AM received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Boehringer, Sanofi, Lilly, Novartis, and Italfarmaco and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, and Takeda. FG received consulting fees from Novocure, BMS, Novartis, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, and MSD; received payment for speaker bureau from Novocure; received support for attending meetings or travel from Novartis, MSD, BMS, PharmaMar, and Pierre Fabre. SD received payment for presentations from Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, and BMS and travel and accommodation support during meetings from Istituto Gentili, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, and BMS. GLC received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novocure and BMS and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novocure. PAZ received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer; received support for attending meetings or travel from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer. MM received support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, Pfizer, and Novartis. FLC received consulting fees from Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Roche; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Roche; and received support for attending meetings or travel from Takeda and Amgen. CG received consulting fees from Karyopharm, Menarini, and Roche; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaux, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, BMS, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, GSK, Roche, Takeda, Boehringer, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for MSD, BMS, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, GSK, Roche, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. FP received partial funding to institution and experimental study drug from Pfizer; received financial support to institution from Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Incyte, Tesaro/GSK, and Merck; and received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Ipsen, Clovis, Astellas, Sanofi, Roche, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Rocket Med provides drainage kits without charge for patients enrolled in randomised clinical trials led by YCGL.

BACKGROUND Malignant mesotheliomas are rare, yet highly malignant tumors. Mesotheliomas are tumors that develop from mesothelial surfaces, with the pleura being the most common, followed by the peritoneum. The diagnosis of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is usually established when the disease is advanced, owing to the nonspecific clinical appearance and abdominal symptoms. Initially, MPM was treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy, with or without palliative surgery. However, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with bidirectional intraoperative chemotherapy (BDIC) has recently emerged as a treatment option for MPM. BDIC creates a bidirectional chemotherapy gradient in the peritoneal tumor cells through the simultaneous use of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy. CRS, combined with BDIC (CRS-BDIC), allows the complete elimination of residual tiny tumor cells after complete removal of the visible tumor nodules. CASE REPORT Herein, we present a case of a 51-year-old woman with MPM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b. Her treatment consisted of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, followed by CRS-BDIC using intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin, and intravenous ifosfamide. The surgery was successful, with no immediate complications or decline in the patient's kidney function. On follow up 2 months later, the patient denies suffering any chemotherapy-related adverse effects, and her kidney profile remains stable. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, nephrotoxicity, a known adverse effect of cisplatin and ifosfamide, might not be a contraindication for the use of these potentially nephrotoxic drugs in CRS-BDIC in patients with renal impairment.

Background: Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval., Objectives: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of nivolumab+ipilimumab versus pemetrexed+platinum (with/without bevacizumab) for Swiss patients with unresectable MPM, overall and by histological subtype., Methods: We developed a three-state Markov cohort model with a cycle length of 1 month, a 30-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 3% per year for costs and benefits. The model included the updated survival and treatment-dependent utility results from the Checkmate-743 and MAPS registration trials. A Swiss statutory health insurance perspective was considered with unit costs for 2022 from publicly available and real-world sources. We assumed a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF100,000/QALY. Model robustness was explored in sensitivity and scenario analyses., Results: Compared with chemotherapy, nivolumab+ipilimumab incurred additional costs of CHF109,115 and 0.57 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CHF192,585/QALY (i.e. USD201,829/QALY) gained. Relative to their 2022 list price, nivolumab+ipilimumab may be cost effective if priced at 48% across all histologies. Assuming cisplatin-based instead of carboplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the ICER to CHF158,911/QALY (i.e. USD166,539/QALY). For the non-epithelioid subtype, nivolumab+ipilimumab was cost effective compared with chemotherapy (ICER of CHF97,894/QALY, i.e. USD102,593/QALY). Chemotherapy+bevacizumab was often a dominated strategy or would require a bevacizumab cost reduction to 28%., Conclusions: Our model projected nivolumab+ipilimumab to be cost effective for the non-epithelioid subtype but not for all histologies. Substantial discounts for nivolumab+ipilimumab would be necessary to achieve cost effectiveness for all histologies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Hyperthermic intraoperative cisplatin (HIOC) is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Administration of high-dose magnesium attenuates cisplatin-induced AKI (CP-AKI) in animal models but has not been rigorously examined in humans., Methods: We tested the feasibility and safety of different doses of magnesium in mesothelioma patients receiving HIOC. In Pilot Study 1, we administered a 36-h continuous infusion of magnesium at 0.5 g/h, targeting serum magnesium levels between 3 and 4.8 mg/dL. In Pilot Study 2A, we administered a 6 g bolus followed by an infusion starting at 2 g/h, titrated to achieve levels between 4 and 6 mg/dL. We eliminated the bolus in Pilot Study 2B., Results: In Pilot Study 1, all five patients enrolled completed the study; however, median postoperative Mg levels were only 2.4 mg/dL. In Pilot Study 2A, two of four patients (50%) were withdrawn due to bradycardia during the bolus. In Pilot Study 2B, two patients completed the study whereas two developed postoperative bradycardia attributed to the magnesium., Conclusions: A 0.5 g/h infusion for 36 h did not achieve therapeutic magnesium levels, while an infusion at 2 g/h was associated with bradycardia. These studies informed the design of a randomized clinical trial testing whether intravenously Mg attenuates HIOC-associated AKI., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Malignant mesothelioma is a rapidly lethal cancer that has been increasing at an epidemic rate over the last three decades. Targeted therapies for mesothelioma have been lacking. A previous study called MiST1 (NCT03654833), evaluated the efficacy of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition in mesothelioma. This study met its primary endpoint with 15% of patients having durable responses exceeding 1 year. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate PARP inhibitors in relapsed mesothelioma patients, where options are limited. Niraparib is the PARP inhibitor used in NERO., Methods: NERO is a multicentre, two-arm, open-label UK randomised phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of PARP inhibition in relapsed mesothelioma. 84 patients are being recruited. NERO is not restricted by line of therapy; however, eligible participants must have been treated with an approved platinum based systemic therapy. Participants will be randomised 2:1, stratified according to histology and response to prior platinum-based chemotherapy, to receive either active symptom control (ASC) and niraparib or ASC alone, for up to 24 weeks. Participants will be treated until disease progression, withdrawal, death or development of significant treatment limiting toxicity. Participants randomised to niraparib will receive 200 or 300 mg daily in a 3-weekly cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, where progression is determined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) or RECIST 1.1; investigator reported progression; or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, best overall response, 12-week and 24 week disease control, duration of response, treatment compliance and safety/tolerability. If NERO shows niraparib to be safe and biologically effective, it may lead to future late phase randomised controlled trials in relapsed mesothelioma., Ethics and Dissemination: The study received ethical approval from London-Hampstead Research Ethics Committee on 06-May-2022 (22/LO/0281). Data from all centres will be analysed together and published as soon as possible., Trial Registration Number: ISCRTN16171129; NCT05455424., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare and aggressive primary peritoneal disease, with recommended treatment, in eligible patients, of a combination of complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As treatment is multimodal, there is a wide heterogeneity of HIPEC protocols precluding clear comparisons. Standardization at an international level is required., Methods: The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) designated a steering committee to produce consensus recommendations for HIPEC regimens, adapted to each etiology. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used, based on a systematic review focused on main outcomes related to HIPEC regimens in DMPM patients and on the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method to elaborate main questions. An opinion survey was added. Furthermore, a Delphi process was performed with voting from a panel of international experts., Results: Eleven questions were elaborated, including two for future research requirements and three to assess the HIPEC regimen preference of the panel. The level of evidence underlying questions was globally low. Overall, 75 (86%) and 67 (77%) of the 87 invited experts completed the vote at the first and second round, respectively. HIPEC following complete CRS was strongly supported by 88% of voters with no need to plan comparative studies with CRS alone for 61.2% of voters. Bi-drug regimens appeared to be preferred to mono-drug ones and cisplatin was globally favored. The opinion survey confirmed the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin as the recommended regimen., Conclusion: International consensus confirmed the indication of HIPEC following complete CRS in DMPM patients and recommended cisplatin-doxorubicin as the first-line HIPEC regimen., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and lenvatinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor, shows synergistic activity in preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumours. We assessed the clinical activity of this combination therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy., Methods: In this single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study, done at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with pleural mesothelioma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progression after chemotherapy (no previous immunotherapy), and measurable disease according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) for mesothelioma version 1.1. Patients received 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks plus 20 mg oral lenvatinib once per day for up to 2 years or until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate identified by a local investigator according to mRECIST version 1.1. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04287829, and is recruiting for the second cohort., Findings: Between March 5, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 42 patients were screened, of whom 38 were included in the primary endpoint and safety analyses (median age 71 years [IQR 65-75], 33 [87%] male and five [13%] female) . At data cutoff (Jan 31, 2023), with a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 13·8-19·4), 22 (58%; 95% CI 41-74) of 38 patients had an objective response. The independent review showed an objective response in 17 (45%; 95% CI 29-62) of 38 patients. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, including one treatment-related death due to myocardial infarction. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (eight patients [21%]) and anorexia and lymphopenia (both four patients [11%]). In 29 (76%) of 38 patients, at least one dose reduction or discontinuation of lenvatinib was required., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed promising anti-tumour activity in patients with pleural mesothelioma with considerable toxicity, similar to that in previous studies. Available evidence from the literature suggests a high starting dose of lenvatinib for optimal anti-tumour activity. This, however, demands a high standard of supportive care. The combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib warrants further investigation in pleural mesothelioma., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PB reports consulting fees (paid to his institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Amheart; honoraria for lectures from Bristol Myers Squibb; travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb; has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb (paid to his institution); and participated on advisory boards for MSD. JAB has received research support from MSD (sponsored the study financially and provided the medication); consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb (paid to his institution); and honoraria from MSD (paid to his institution). KM has received consulting fees from Amgen, Lilly, and Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) has been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology-Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Version 1.2022) and Chinese Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (2021 edition) as the first-line treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM). But whether immunotherapy has a financial advantage over conventional chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin, C) is uncertain., Methods: Based on survival and safety data from the CheckMate 743 clinical trial (NCT02899299), a partitioned survival model was constructed using TreeAge Pro2022 software. The model cycle was set to 1 month and the study period was 10 years. The output indicators included total cost, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the results, considering only direct medical costs., Results and Discussion: The ICER for group NI versus Group C was $375,656/QALY in all randomized patients, $327,943/QALY in patients with epithelioid histology, and $115,495/QALY in patients with non-epithelioid histology. The ICERs of all three different populations all exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold (three times the per capita gross domestic product of China in 2021). The results of univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the price of pemetrexed and nivolumab had great influence on the analysis results. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis show that the probability of the NI scheme being more economical in all three different populations was 0., What Is New and Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, in patients with unresectable MPM, NI has no economic advantage over C., (© 2023. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).)

Infiltration of tumor by T cells is a prerequisite for successful immunotherapy of solid tumors. In this study, we investigate the influence of tumor-targeted radiation on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy tumor infiltration, accumulation, and efficacy in clinically relevant models of pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancers. We use a nonablative dose of tumor-targeted radiation prior to systemic administration of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells to assess infiltration, proliferation, antitumor efficacy, and functional persistence of CAR T cells at primary and distant sites of tumor. A tumor-targeted, nonablative dose of radiation promotes early and high infiltration, proliferation, and functional persistence of CAR T cells. Tumor-targeted radiation promotes tumor-chemokine expression and chemokine-receptor expression in infiltrating T cells and results in a subpopulation of higher-intensity CAR-expressing T cells with high coexpression of chemokine receptors that further infiltrate distant sites of disease, enhancing CAR T-cell antitumor efficacy. Enhanced CAR T-cell efficacy is evident in models of both high-mesothelin-expressing mesothelioma and mixed-mesothelin-expressing lung cancer-two thoracic cancers for which radiotherapy is part of the standard of care. Our results strongly suggest that the use of tumor-targeted radiation prior to systemic administration of CAR T cells may substantially improve CAR T-cell therapy efficacy for solid tumors. Building on our observations, we describe a translational strategy of "sandwich" cell therapy for solid tumors that combines sequential metastatic site-targeted radiation and CAR T cells-a regional solution to overcome barriers to systemic delivery of CAR T cells., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Few tissue biomarkers exist to date that could enrich patient with cancer populations to benefit from immune checkpoint blockade by programmed cell death protein 1/ligand-1 (PD-/L-1) inhibitors. PD-L1 expression has value in this context in some tumor types but is an imperfect predictor of clinical benefit. In malignant pleural mesothelioma, PD-L1 expression is not predictive of the benefit from PD-1 blockade. We aimed to identify novel markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma to select patients better., Methods: We performed a multiplex-immune histochemistry analysis of tumor samples from the phase III PROMISE-meso study, which randomized 144 pretreated patients to receive either pembrolizumab or standard second-line chemotherapy. Our panel focused on CD8+T cell, CD68+macrophages, and the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 on these and cancer cells. We analyzed single and double positive cells within cancer tissues (infiltrating immune cells) and in the stroma. In addition, we performed cell neighborhood analysis. The cell counts were compared with clinical outcomes, including responses, progression-free and overall survivals., Results: We confirmed the absence of predictive value for PD-L1 in this cohort of patients. Furthermore, total CD8 T cells, CD68+macrophages, or inflammatory subtypes (desert, excluded, inflamed) did not predict outcomes. In contrast, PD-1-expressing CD8+T cells (exhausted T cells) and PD-1-expressing CD68+macrophages were both independent predictors of progression-free survival benefit from pembrolizumab. Patients with tumors simultaneously harboring PD1+T cells and PD-1+macrophages benefited the most from immune therapy., Conclusion: We analyzed a large cohort of patients within a phase III study and found that not only PD-1+CD8 T cells but also PD-1+CD68+ macrophages are predictive. This data provides evidence for the first time for the existence of PD-1+macrophages in mesothelioma and their clinical relevance for immune checkpoint blockade., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KH: Grant support: MSD, Roche, BMS, Molecular Partners, Travel grant: BMS, MSD, Astra-Zeneca. MO: Ad boards for MSD and Roche. RS: Ad board for MSD, Merck and Pierre Fabre., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare malignancy originating from the peritoneal lining. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the standard-of-care for patients with isolated PM. Due to a paucity of prospective data there are several different HIPEC protocols. The aims of this study are to describe the CRS and HIPEC protocols for PM and patient outcomes across Canada., Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients diagnosed and treated for PM with CRS and HIPEC in four major peritoneal disease centers in Canada between 2000 and 2021. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and survival were collected., Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. Mean age was 52 years (17-75) and 37.5% were male. Epithelioid (70.1%) and multicystic (13%) mesothelioma were the most common subtypes. Twenty-one patients (30%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CRS and HIPEC was performed in 64 patients (91.4%). Of these, the mean PCI was 22 (2-39) and cisplatin+doxorubicin was the most common HIPEC regimen (n = 33, 51.6%). A semi-closed coliseum technique was used in 68.8% of HIPECs and the mean duration of surgery was 486 min (90-1052). Clavien-Dindo III or IV complications occurred in 12 patients (16.9%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (0.2-104.4), we found a 5-year overall survival of 61% and a 5-year recurrence-free survival of 35%., Conclusion: CRS and HIPEC is a safe and effective treatment modality for well-selected patients with PM, with some achieving prolonged survival., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: VEGF/VEGFR autocrine loop is a hallmark of pleural mesothelioma (PM). We thus assayed the prognostic and predictive values of VEGFR-2 [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 or Flk-1] and CD34, a marker of endothelial cells, in samples from patients accrued in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study ('MAPS', NCT00651456)., Materials and Methods: VEGFR2 and CD34 expression were assayed using immunohistochemistry in 333 MAPS patients (74.3%), and their prognostic value was evaluated in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate and multivariate analyses, before validation by bootstrap methodology., Results: Positive VEGFR2 or CD34 staining was observed in 234/333 (70.2%) and 322/323 (99.6%) of tested specimens, respectively. VEGFR2 and CD34 staining correlated weakly, yet significantly, with each other (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). High VEGFR2 expression or high CD34 levels were associated with longer OS in PM patients in multivariate analysis (VEGFR2: adjusted [adj.] hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.88; 0.95], p < 0.001; CD34: adj. HR: 0.86, 95 %CI [0.76; 0.96], p = 0.010), with only high VEGFR2 expression resulting in significantly longer PFS (VEGFR2: adj. HR: 0.96, 95 %CI [0.92; 0.996], p = 0.032). Stability of these results was confirmed using bootstrap procedure. Nevertheless, VEGFR2 expression failed to specifically predict longer survival in bevacizumab-chemotherapy combination trial arm, regardless of whether the VEGFR2 score was combined or not with serum VEGF concentrations., Conclusion: VEGFR2 overexpression independently correlated with longer OS or PFS in PM patients, such biomarker deserving prospective evaluation as stratification variable in future clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Franck Morin reports financial support was provided by Roche-France (2013). Solenn Brosseau reports financial support was provided by CHU de Caen (APRI 2012). Gerard Zalcman reports financial support was provided by League against Cancer (2012). Guenaelle Levallet reports financial support was provided by Fond de Recherche en Santé Respiratoire (FRSR 2012)., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival outcomes, but recurrence rates remain high. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (DCBI) showed promising results in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The primary aim of this trial was to determine feasibility of adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC., Methods: This open-label, single-center, phase II clinical trial, performed in the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, the Netherlands, included patients with epithelioid MPM. 4-6 weeks before CRS-HIPEC leukapheresis was performed. 8-10 weeks after surgery, DCBI was administered three times biweekly. Feasibility was defined as administration of at least three adjuvant vaccinations in 75% of patients. Comprehensive immune cell profiling was performed on peripheral blood samples prior to and during treatment., Results: All patients who received CRS-HIPEC (n=16) were successfully treated with adjuvant DCBI. No severe toxicity related to DCBI was observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (IQR 5-23) and median overall survival was not reached. DCBI was associated with increased proliferation of circulating natural killer cells and CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells. Co-stimulatory molecules, including ICOS, HLA-DR, and CD28 were upregulated predominantly on memory or proliferating Th-cells and minimally on CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) after treatment. However, an increase in CD8+ terminally differentiated effector memory (Temra) cells positively correlated with PFS, whereas co-expression of ICOS and Ki67 on CTLs trended towards a positive correlation., Conclusions: Adjuvant DCBI after CRS-HIPEC in patients with MPM was feasible and safe, and showed promising survival outcomes. DCBI had an immune modulatory effect on lymphoid cells and induced memory T-cell activation. Moreover, an increase of CD8+ Temra cells was more pronounced in patients with longer PFS. These data provide rationale for future combination treatment strategies., Trial Registration Number: NTR7060; Dutch Trial Register (NTR)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JGJVA declares consulting fees from MSD, BMS, Takeda, Amphera, AstraZeneca and Eli-Lilly, is a stock owner of Amphera and has intellectual property rights in Amphera and Pamgene., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, representing about 10-15% of all mesothelioma cases. Herein we apply PM patient-derived tumor organoids (PTOs) in elucidating personalized HIPEC responses to bypass rarity of disease in generating preclinical data. Specimens were obtained from PM patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. PTOs were fabricated with tumor cells suspended in ECM-hydrogel and treated with HIPEC regimen parameters. Viability and characterization analyses were performed post-treatment. Treatment efficacy was defined as ≥ 50% viability reduction and p < 0.05 compared to controls. From October 2020 to November 2022, 17 tumors from 7 patients were biofabricated into organoids, with 16/17 (94.1%) sites undergoing comparative 37° and 42° treatments with cisplatin and mitomycin C (MMC). Hyperthermic cisplatin and MMC enhanced cytotoxicity which reduced treatment viability by 25% and 22%, respectively, compared to normothermia. Heated cisplatin displayed the greatest cytotoxicity, with efficacy in 12/16 (75%) tumors and an average viability of 38% (5-68%). Heated MMC demonstrated efficacy in 7/16 (43.8%) tumors with an average treatment viability of 51% (17-92.3%). PTOs fabricated from distinct anatomic sites exhibited site-specific variability in treatment responses. PM PTOs exhibit patient and anatomic location treatment responses suggestive of underlying disease clonality. In PM organoids cisplatin is superior to MMC in HIPEC., (© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in pleural mesothelioma has recently been established. The response to ICIs can be predicted by quantitative analysis of cells and their spatial distribution in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, the detailed composition of the TME in pleural mesothelioma has not been reported. We evaluated the association between the TME and response to ICIs in this cancer., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 22 pleural mesothelioma patients treated with nivolumab in different centers was performed using surgical specimens. Four patients had a partial response to nivolumab (response group) and 18 patients had stable or progressive disease (nonresponse group). The number of CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CK, and PD-L1 positive cells, cell density, and cell-to-cell distance were analyzed by multiplex immunofluorescence., Results: PD-L1 expression did not differ significantly between the response and nonresponse groups. The density of total T cells and of CD8 + T cells was significantly higher in the response than in the nonresponse group. CD8 + T cells were more clustered and located closer to tumor cells, whereas regulatory T cells were located further from tumor cells in the response than in the nonresponse group., Conclusions: High density and spatial proximity of CD8 + T cells to tumor cells were associated with better response to nivolumab, whereas the proximity of regulatory T cells to tumor cells was associated with worse response, suggesting that the distinct landscape of the TME could be a potential predictor of ICI efficacy in pleural mesothelioma., (© 2023 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: Pleural mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive cancer originating in the pleura, with a devastating prognosis and limited treatment options. There have been significant advancements in the management of this disease in recent years. Since 2021, nivolumab and ipilimumab immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the new standard of care for first-line treatment of pleural mesothelioma., Areas Covered: While a combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to be the next step, targeted therapies are emerging thanks to our understanding of the oncogenesis of pleural mesothelioma. Moreover, several new strategies are currently being investigated, including viral therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and even cell therapies with CAR-T cells or dendritic cells. In this review, we will explore the various future opportunities that could potentially transform patients' lives in light of the clinical trials that have been conducted., Expert Opinion: Future clinical studies aim to rebiopsy patients after disease progression to identify new molecular alterations and to be associated with ancillary studies, guiding subsequent therapy decisions. Predicting and investigating treatment resistance mechanisms will lead to innovative approaches and improved treatment outcomes.

Canine malignant mesothelioma (cMM) is a rare and drug-resistant malignant tumor. Due to few patients and experimental models, there have not been enough studies to demonstrate the pathogenesis of the disease and novel effective treatment for cMM. Since cMM resembles human MM (hMM) in histopathological characteristics, it is also considered a promising research model of hMM. Compared with conventional 2-dimensional (2D) culture methods, 3-dimensional (3D) organoid culture can recapitulate the properties of original tumor tissues. However, cMM organoids have never been developed. In the present study, we for the first time generated cMM organoids using the pleural effusion samples. Organoids from individual MM dogs were successfully generated. They exhibited the characteristics of MM and expressed mesothelial cell markers, such as WT-1 and mesothelin. The sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs was different in each strain of cMM organoids. RNA sequencing analysis showed cell adhesion molecule pathways were specifically upregulated in cMM organoids compared with their corresponding 2D cultured cells. Among these genes, the expression level of E-cadherin was drastically higher in the organoids than that in the 2D cells. In conclusion, our established cMM organoids might become a new experimental tool to provide new insights into canine and human MM therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare no competing financial and non-financial interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a first-line treatment option for patients with pleural mesothelioma with the recent approval of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Mesothelioma has a low tumor mutation burden and no robust predictors of survival with ICI. Since ICIs enable adaptive antitumor immune responses, we investigated T-cell receptor (TCR) associations with survival in participants from two clinical trials treated with ICI., Methods: We included patients with pleural mesothelioma who were treated with nivolumab (NivoMes, NCT02497508) or nivolumab and ipilimumab (INITIATE, NCT03048474) after first-line therapy. TCR sequencing was performed with the ImmunoSEQ assay in 49 and 39 pretreatment and post-treatment patient peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples. These data were integrated with TCR sequences found in bulk RNAseq data by TRUST4 program in 45 and 35 pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsy samples and TCR sequences from over 600 healthy controls. The TCR sequences were clustered into groups of shared antigen specificity using GIANA. Associations of TCR clusters with overall survival were determined by cox proportional hazard analysis., Results: We identified 4.2 million and 12 thousand complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) sequences from PBMCs and tumors, respectively, in patients treated with ICI. These CDR3 sequences were integrated with 2.1 million publically available CDR3 sequences from healthy controls and clustered. ICI-enhanced T-cell infiltration and expanded T cell diversity in tumors. Cases with TCR clones in the top tertile in the pretreatment tissue or in circulation had significantly better survival than the bottom two tertiles (p<0.04). Furthermore, a high number of shared TCR clones between pretreatment tissue and in circulation was associated with improved survival (p=0.01). To potentially select antitumor clusters, we filtered for clusters that were (1) not found in healthy controls, (2) recurrent in multiple patients with mesothelioma, and (3) more prevalent in post-treatment than pretreatment samples. The detection of two-specific TCR clusters provided significant survival benefit compared with detection of 1 cluster (HR<0.001, p=0.026) or the detection of no TCR clusters (HR=0.10, p=0.002). These two clusters were not found in bulk tissue RNA-seq data and have not been reported in public CDR3 databases., Conclusions: We identified two unique TCR clusters that were associated with survival on treatment with ICI in patients with pleural mesothelioma. These clusters may enable approaches for antigen discovery and inform future targets for design of adoptive T cell therapies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AM reports honoraria to his institution for participation in advisory boards from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Genentech, Janssen; Travel support and honoraria from Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals, and is non-remunerated member of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation and Friends of Patan Hospital Board of Directors., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an asbestos-related fatal malignant neoplasm. Although there has been no reliable chemotherapeutic regimen other than combination therapy of cisplatin and pemetrexed for two decades, combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab brought about a better outcome in patients with MPM. Thus, cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is expected to play a central role in the treatment of MPM. To maximize the antitumor effect of ICI, we evaluated whether nintedanib, an antiangiogenic agent, could augment the antitumor effect of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody (Ab). Although nintedanib could not inhibit the proliferation of mesothelioma cells in vitro, it significantly suppressed the growth of mesothelioma allografts in mice. Moreover, combination therapy with anti-PD-1 Ab plus nintedanib reduced tumor burden more dramatically compared with nintedanib monotherapy via inducing remarkable necrosis in MPM allografts. Nintedanib did not promote the infiltration of CD8 +  T cells within the tumor when used alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 Ab but it independently decreased the infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Moreover, immunohistochemical analysis and ex vivo study using bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) showed that nintedanib could polarize TAMs from M2 to M1 phenotype. These results indicated that nintedanib had a potential to suppress protumor activity of TAMs both numerically and functionally. On the other hand, ex vivo study revealed that nintedanib upregulated the expression of PD-1 and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in BMDMs and mesothelioma cells, respectively, and exhibited the impairment of phagocytic activity of BMDMs against mesothelioma cells. Co-administration of anti-PD-1 Ab may reactivate phagocytic activity of BMDMs by disrupting nintedanib-induced immunosuppressive signal via binding between PD-1 on BMDMs and PD-L1 on mesothelioma cells. Collectively, combination therapy of anti-PD-1 Ab plus nintedanib enhances the antitumor activity compared with respective monotherapy and can become a novel therapeutic option for patients with MPM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm that is typically diagnosed in a locally advanced stage, making it not eligible for radical surgery and requiring systemic treatment. Chemotherapy with platinum compounds and pemetrexed has been the only approved standard of care for approximately 20 years, without any relevant therapeutic advance until the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor, with an average survival of only 18 months. Thanks to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor biology, targeted therapy has become an essential therapeutic option in several solid malignancies. Unfortunately, most of the clinical trials evaluating potentially targeted drugs for MPM have failed. This review aims to present the main findings of the most promising targeted therapies in MPM, and to explore possible reasons leading to treatments failures. The ultimate goal is to determine whether there is still a place for continued preclinical/clinical research in this area.

Objective: To observe the present situation, efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: The data of 39 patients with MPM in two centers from 2016 to 2021 were collected and the efficacy and safety were evaluated. According to the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), these patients, whose median clinical follow-up amounting to 18.97 months, were divided into immunotherapy group (19 cases) and control group (20 cases). Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were used for the survival analysis. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) in the immunotherapy group is 21.05% and 79.0% respectively, compared with 10.0% and 55.0% in the control group; and the difference was not statistically significant ( P >0.05). The median overall survival (OS) in the immunotherapy group was significantly longer than that in the control group (14.53 months vs 7.07 months, P =0.015), but there was no significant difference in the median progression free survival (PFS) between two groups (4.80 months vs 2.03 months, P =0.062). Single factor survival analysis showed that the nature of pleural effusion, pathological subtype and the efficacy of immunotherapy were related to both PFS and OS of the patients with MPM ( P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in immunotherapy group was 89.5% (17 out of 19 cases), and the most common adverse event was hematological toxicity (9 cases), followed by nausea and vomiting (7 cases), fatigue (6 cases) and skin damage (6 cases). Five patients had immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) related adverse reactions with grade 1-2. Conclusions: Patients with MPM have begun to receive immunotherapy in more than 2-line mainly combined chemotherapy in the real world, and the median treatment line is 2-line. Either combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy, ICI inhibitors have significant efficacy, controllable adverse events and good clinical value.

Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare diagnosis with a dismal prognosis if untreated. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is shown to significantly improve survival. Our institution is uniquely positioned to report long-term outcomes in MPM with CRS-HIPEC, due to our robust peritoneal surface disease program existing over the past three decades., Methods: Our prospectively maintained, single-institution database of CRS-HIPEC cases was reviewed, identifying 111 consecutive patients with MPM over 28 years (1993-2021). Prognostic, operative, and pathologic factors were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and conditional survival (CS) analyses were performed., Results: The average age was 55.1 years; 58.6% of patients were male; 17 of 111 patients (15.3%) had a second CRS-HIPEC. At first CRS-HIPEC, the average PCI score was 18.7, and the perfusate drugs were platinum-based (72.1%) and mitomycin C (27.9%). The resection status at first CRS-HIPEC was R2a (46.4%), followed by R0-1 (29.1%), and R2b-c (24.5%). Median OS was 3.3 years for the entire cohort, with 75th and 25th percentiles at 10.7 months and 10.6 years. Median CS was improved if patients survived to the 1-year postoperative mark (4.9 years, p < 0.01) and trended toward further improvement with each passing year. If 3-year postoperative survival was achieved, the median CS improved to 6.1 years., Conclusions: This represents one of the largest and lengthiest, single-center, longitudinal, case series of peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS-HIPEC. The OS suggests efficacy for CRS-HIPEC for MPM. Long-term survival improves significantly after patients achieve the 1-year, postoperative mark., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Malignant mesothelioma is a highly malignant disease that most often occurs in the pleural cavity, followed by the peritoneum and pericardium. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) accounts for 10%-15% of all mesothelioma. The most important risk factor for MPM is exposure to asbestos. MPM has no specific clinical symptoms, imaging and histopathology are critical for the diagnosis. There are currently no generally accepted guidelines for curative treatment of MPM. The patient mainly presented with abdominal pain, abdominal distension and discomfort. Due to extensive omentum metastasis, no further surgical treatment was performed. Pemetrexed combined with cisplatin chemotherapy was given for 2 cycles, and the patient is still alive.

Background: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare tumor with a dismal prognosis. The low efficacy of current treatment options highlights the urge to identify more effective therapies aimed at improving MM patients' survival. Bortezomib (Bor) is a specific and reversible inhibitor of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the 20S core of the proteasome, currently approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. On the other hand, Bor appears to have limited clinical effects on solid tumors, because of its low penetration and accumulation into tumor tissues following intravenous administration. These limitations could be overcome in MM through intracavitary delivery, with the advantage of increasing local drug concentration and decreasing systemic toxicity., Methods: In this study, we investigated the effects of Bor on cell survival, cell cycle distribution and modulation of apoptotic and pro-survival pathways in human MM cell lines of different histotypes cultured in vitro. Further, using a mouse MM cell line that reproducibly forms ascites when intraperitoneally injected in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, we investigated the effects of intraperitoneal Bor administration in vivo on both tumor growth and the modulation of the tumor immune microenvironment., Results: We demonstrate that Bor inhibited MM cell growth and induced apoptosis. Further, Bor activated the Unfolded Protein Response, which however appeared to participate in lowering cells' sensitivity to the drug's cytotoxic effects. Bor also affected the expression of EGFR and ErbB2 and the activation of downstream pro-survival signaling effectors, including ERK1/2 and AKT. In vivo, Bor was able to suppress MM growth and extend mice survival. The Bor-mediated delay of tumor progression was sustained by increased activation of T lymphocytes recruited to the tumor microenvironment., Conclusions: The results presented herein support the use of Bor in MM and advocate future studies aimed at defining the therapeutic potential of Bor and Bor-based combination regimens for this treatment-resistant, aggressive tumor., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) indicates advanced stage cancer, which is generally associated with a poor outcome and a 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an option for treating patients with primary PC, such as mesothelioma, or secondary PC, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) or pseudomixoma. Until recently, such patients were deemed untreatable. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of CRS + HIPEC in patients with PC. Postoperative complications, mortality and survival rates were evaluated according to the diagnosis., Results: Fifty-six patients with PC, undergoing full CRS + HIPEC between October 2004 and January 2020, were enrolled. The mortality rate was 3.8% and the morbidity rate was 61.5%. Complications were significantly higher in proportion to the duration of surgery (p<0.001). The overall survival rates, as shown in the Kaplan-Meyer curve, were respectively 81%, 74% and 53% at 12, 24 and 60 months. Survival rates according to each diagnosis for the same periods were 87%, 82% and 47% in patients with pseudomixoma, and 77%, 72% and 57% in patients with CRC (log-rank 0.371, p=0.543)., Conclusion: CRS with HIPEC is an option for pacients with primary or secondary PC. Although complication rates are high, a longer survival rate may be attained compared to those seen in previously published results; in some cases, patients may even be cured.

Objectives: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. The first-line therapy has remained unchanged for two decades and consists of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have high response rates, resulting in recent updates in treatment recommendations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, the overall benefits of combination treatment are modest, suggesting that other targeted therapy options should be investigated., Materials and Methods: We employed high-throughput drug sensitivity and resistance testing on five established PM cell lines using 527 cancer drugs in a 2D setting. Drugs of the greatest potential (n = 19) were selected for further testing in primary cell models derived from pleural effusions of seven PM patients., Results: All established and primary patient-derived PM cell models were sensitive to the mTOR inhibitor AZD8055. Furthermore, another mTOR inhibitor (temsirolimus) showed efficacy in most of the primary patient-derived cells, although a less robust effect was observed when compared with the established cell lines. Most of the established cell lines and all patient-derived primary cells exhibited sensitivity to the PI3K/mTOR/DNA-PK inhibitor LY3023414. The Chk1 inhibitor prexasertib showed activity in 4/5 (80%) of the established cell lines and in 2/7 (29%) of the patient-derived primary cell lines. The BET family inhibitor JQ1 showed activity in four patient-derived cell models and in one established cell line., Conclusion: mTOR and Chk1 pathways had promising results with established mesothelioma cell lines in an ex vivo setting. In patient-derived primary cells, drugs targeting mTOR pathway in particular showed efficacy. These findings may inform novel treatment strategies for PM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer which at large is not amenable to curative surgery. Despite the recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the response rates and survival following systemic therapy is still limited. Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN38 to trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP-2)-positive cells. Here we have explored the therapeutic potential of sacituzumab govitecan in MPM models., Materials and Methods: TROP2 expression was analyzed in a panel of two well established and 15 pleural effusion derived novel lines by RT-QPCR and immunoblotting, TROP2 membrane-localization was studied by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Cultured mesothelial cells and pneumothorax pleura served as controls. The sensitivity of MPM cell lines to irinotecan and SN38 was studied using cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis and DNA damage assays. Drug sensitivity of cell lines was correlated with RNA expression of DNA repair genes. Drug sensitivity was defined as an IC50 below 5 nM in the cell viability assay., Results: TROP2 expression was detected at RNA and protein level in 6 of the 17 MPM cell lines, but not in in cultured mesothelial control cells or in the mesothelial layer of the pleura. TROP2 was detectable on the cell membrane in 5 MPM lines and was present in the nucleus in 6 cell models. Ten of 17 MPM cell lines showed sensitivity to SN38 treatment, among those 4 expressed TROP2. High AURKA RNA expression and high proliferation rate correlated with sensitivity to SN38-induced cell death, DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest and cell death. Sacituzumab govitecan treatment effectively induced cell cycle arrest and cell death in TROP2-positive MPM cells., Conclusion: TROP2 expression and sensitivity to SN38 in MPM cell lines support biomarker-selected clinical exploration of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with MPM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In inoperable pleural mesothelioma, pemetrexed + cisplatin as first line is considered the standard of care, but novel treatments have been recently proposed. Our objective was to comparatively examine the information on overall survival (OS) with these new agents. The Shiny technique was employed for reconstructing individual patient data. Cox statistics was run to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). After a standard literature search, four new treatments were identified (nivolumab + ipilimumab, bevacizumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin, pembrolizumab monotherapy, and durvalumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin). Pemetrexed + ciplatin was the treatment for controls. Nivolumab + ipilimumab and bevacizumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin showed a better OS compared with controls (HR, 0.79 and 0.79, respectively; p < 0.05). Pembrolizumab determined only a numerical improvement (p > 0.05). In contrast, OS worsened with durvalumab + pemetrexed + cisplatin. Our analysis indicates that the novel treatments for inoperable mesothelioma have similar efficacy and, in general, provide a small though significant survival benefit compared with standard of care. Further research is needed to identify agents determining a more substantial OS improvement.

BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Bidirectional intraoperative chemotherapy (BDIC) using concurrent intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy in combination with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is an emerging treatment option for selected cases of MPM. It is a locoregional treatment that involves intraoperative chemoperfusion of heated chemotherapy. The administration of systemic along with intraperitoneal chemotherapy allows for a bidirectional chemotherapy gradient in peritoneal tumor cells. The aim of this treatment is eradication of microscopic residual cancer cells after major removal of macroscopic tumor nodules. To date, there is no consensus on the chemotherapeutic regimen that can be used in BDIC to manage MPM in patients with severe renal impairment. Administering intravenous ifosfamide with hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin is a promising regimen in treating peritoneal mesothelioma. Nephrotoxicity is a dose-limiting adverse effect of cisplatin and ifosfamide. Therefore, dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment. CASE REPORT In this report, we describe a 46-year-old female patient with recurrent MPM and severe renal impairment. Her treatment was managed with hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin along with intravenous ifosfamide following CRS. The cisplatin dose was reduced to 50% and the ifosfamide dose was reduced by 25%. The patient tolerated the procedure well, without deterioration in her renal function. At her 9-month follow-up, she did not report experiencing chemotherapy-related adverse effects, and her kidney function remained stable. CONCLUSIONS Severe renal impairment might not be a contraindication to using potentially nephrotoxic chemotherapeutic agents in CRS-BDIC.

Background: Only a fraction of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) will respond to chemo- or immunotherapy. For the majority, the condition will irremediably relapse after 13 to 18 months. In this study, we hypothesized that patients' outcome could be correlated to their immune cell profile. Focus was given to peripheral blood eosinophils that, paradoxically, can both promote or inhibit tumor growth depending on the cancer type., Methods: The characteristics of 242 patients with histologically proven MPM were retrospectively collected in three centers. Characteristics included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The mean absolute eosinophil counts (AEC) were determined by averaging AEC data sets of the last month preceding the administration of chemo- or immunotherapy., Results: An optimal cutoff of 220 eosinophils/µL of blood segregated the cohort into two groups with significantly different median OS after chemotherapy (14 and 29 months above and below the threshold, p = 0.0001). The corresponding two-year OS rates were 28% and 55% in the AEC ≥ 220/µL and AEC < 220/µL groups, respectively. Based on shorter median PFS (8 vs 17 months, p < 0.0001) and reduced DCR (55.9% vs 35.2% at 6 months), the response to standard chemotherapy was significantly affected in the AEC ≥ 220/µL subset. Similar conclusions were also drawn from data sets of patients receiving immune checkpoint-based immunotherapy., Conclusion: In conclusion, baseline AEC ≥ 220/µL preceding therapy is associated with worse outcome and quicker relapse in MPM., Competing Interests: Beyond the scope of this study, AS participated to clinical trials and expert boards with Amphera, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Regeneron/Sanofi, Roche and Trizell. VH declares consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and Chiesi. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Willems, Scherpereel, Wasielewski, Raskin, Brossel, Fontaine, Grégoire, Halkin, Jamakhani, Heinen, Louis, Duysinx, Hamaidia and Willems.)

Background: Treatment of recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains challenging. Our study examined the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery., Methods: Treatment comprised 360 mg nivolumab every 3 weeks and 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab every 6 weeks, both administered intravenously. Both were discontinued for progressive disease or serious adverse events (AEs). Additional post-treatment data were evaluated, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), post-treatment survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Survival analysis was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier plot. Feasibility analysis was performed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0., Results: Forty-one patients received nivolumab with ipilimumab for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery (median follow-up, 10.4 months; median treatment, 5.1 months). Overall, 18 patients exhibited partial response, 13 exhibited stable disease, and 10 had documented progressive disease. ORR and DCR were 43.9 and 75.6%, respectively. The 12-month post-treatment survival rate and PFS rate were 74.2 and 40.0%, respectively (median survival, not calculated; median PFS, 7.3 months). Further, 47 AEs were reported in 29 patients (70.7%), including grade 3-4 AEs in 14 patients (34.1%). Grade 4 hepatobiliary disorders were observed in 2 patients and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 1., Conclusion: Nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment in patients with recurrent MPM after primary surgical treatment may be clinically efficacious, although serious AEs may be frequently observed., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Nanoparticle biodistribution in vivo is an essential component to the success of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. Previous studies with fluorescently labeled expansile nanoparticles, or "eNPs", demonstrated a high specificity of eNPs to tumors that is achieved through a materials-based targeting strategy. However, fluorescent labeling techniques are primarily qualitative in nature and the gold-standard for quantitative evaluation of biodistribution is through radiolabeling. In this manuscript, we synthesize 14 C-labeled eNPs to quantitatively evaluate the biodistribution of these particles in a murine model of intraperitoneal mesothelioma via liquid scintillation counting. The results demonstrate a strong specificity of eNPs for tumors that lasts one to 2 weeks postinjection with an overall delivery efficiency to the tumor tissue of 30% of the injected dose which is congruent with prior reports of preclinical efficacy of the technology. Importantly, the route of administration is essential to the eNP's material-based targeting strategy with intraperitoneal administration leading to tumoral accumulation while, in contrast, intravenous administration leads to rapid clearance via the reticuloendothelial system and low tumoral accumulation. A comparison against nanoparticle delivery systems published over the past decade shows that the 30% tumoral delivery efficiency of the eNP is significantly higher than the 0.7% median delivery efficiency of other systems with sufficient quantitative data to define this metric. These results lay a foundation for targeting intraperitoneal tumors and encourage efforts to explore alternative, nonintravenous routes, of delivery to accelerate the translation of nanoparticle therapies to the clinic.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare and aggressive neoplasm, usually associated with a poor prognosis (5 years survival rate <10%). For unresectable disease, platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy has been the only standard of care in first line for more than two decades, while no standard treatments have been approved in subsequent lines. Recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of MM. In fact, the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab has been approved in first line setting. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed promising results also in second-third line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of patients are primary refractory to ICIs and there is an urgent need for reliable biomarkers to improve patient's selection. Several biological and molecular features have been studied for this goal. In particular, histological subtype (recognized as prognostic factor for MM and predictive factor for chemotherapy response), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and tumor mutational burden (widely hypothesized as predictive biomarkers for ICIs in several solid tumors) have been evaluated, but with unconclusive results. On the other hand, the deep analysis of tumor infiltrating microenvironment and the improvement in genomic profiling techniques has led to a better knowledge of several mechanisms underlying the MM biology and a greater or poorer immune activation. Consequentially, several potential biomarkers predictive of response to immunotherapy in patients with MM have been identified, also if all these elements need to be further investigated and prospectively validated. In this paper, the main evidences about clinical efficacy of ICIs in MM and the literature data about the most promising predictive biomarkers to immunotherapy are reviewed., Competing Interests: PZ reports outside the submitted work personal fees for advisory role, speaker engagements and travel and accommodation expenses from Merck Sharp & Dohme MSD, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer. AS reports outside the submitted work personal fees for consultant or advisory role for SArqule, Sanofi, BMS, Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Perrino, De Vincenzo, Cordua, Borea, Aliprandi, Santoro and Zucali.)

Given the need to improve the efficacy of standard-of-care immunotherapy (anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD-1) in human malignant pleural mesothelioma (hMPM), we thoroughly characterized the immunobiology of the AB12 murine mesothelioma (MM) model, aiming to increase its accuracy in predicting the response of hMPM to immunotherapy and in designing novel anti-hMPM treatments. Specifically, we used immunologic, transcriptomic and survival analyses, to synchronize the MM tumor growth phases and immune evolution with the histo-molecular and immunological characteristics of hMPM while also determining the anti-MM efficacy of standard-of-care anti-hMPM immunotherapy as a benchmark that novel therapeutics should meet. We report that early-, intermediate- and advanced- AB12 tumors are characterized by a bell-shaped anti-tumor response that peaks in intermediate tumors and decays in advanced tumors. We further show that intermediate- and advanced- tumors match with immune active ("hot") and immune inactive ("cold") hMPM respectively, and that they respond to immunotherapy in a manner that corresponds well with its performance in real-life settings. Finally, we show that in advanced tumors, addition of cisplatin to anti CTLA-4 + anti PD-1 can extend mice survival and invigorate the decaying anti-tumor response. Therefore, we highlight this triple combination as a worthy candidate to improve clinical outcomes in hMPM., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Stern, Caruso, Meiller, Mishalian, Hirsch, Bayard, Tadmor, Wald, Jean and Wald.)

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at a single center., Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center observational cohort study of consecutive patients with DMPM treated by CRS-HIPEC at the Department of Surgery I of the University Hospital in Olomouc, Czech Republic., Results: Data on a total of 16 patients were processed. The study group of 16 patients had six (37.5 %) women. The mean age was approximately 62 years. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients (100 %) (CC0: 75 %, CC1: 25 %). All patients underwent a closed form of HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin for 90 min. The mean hospital stay was 13.5 days, including 4.38 days in the ICU (13.5 ± 5.07 and 4.38 ± 1.49, respectively). Major postoperative complications (CD grades 3-4) occurred in four patients (25 %). In-hospital mortality was 6.25 %. In the study group, the median overall survival was 20 months, and the median disease-free survival was 10.3 months., Conclusions: Also under the conditions at our specialized center, CRS-HIPEC is considered as an effective, affordable, and safe therapy with OS, DFS, morbidity, and mortality rates comparable to those reported in the literature (Tab. 5, Fig. 2, Ref. 28). Text in PDF www.elis.sk Keywords: cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, malignant mesothelioma, cisplatin, doxorubicin.

Background: A rare yet severe neoplasia called malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) typically manifests itself in advanced stages. Despite some improvements in the treatment of patients with MPM, this malignancy continues to have a detrimental prognosis . The primary goal of the present study was to assess the associatin between ERCC1, RRM1, and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and disease outcome in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with either pemetrexed plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin., Methods: This prospective cohort study was done on ninety-one advanced MPM patients. The patients received either pemetrexed plus platinum (55 of 91) or gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy (36 of 91). Tissue biopsy was taken at time of diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the levels of ERCC1, RRM1, and TS transcription in tissue biopsies (paraffin embedded)., Results: Based on the findings, 70% of patients with low expression of TS had low expression of ERCC1, and 68% of patients with high expression of TS had high expression of ERCC1, suggesting  a significat association between ERCC1 expression and TS expression (p=0.005). However, there was no relation between ERCC1 and RRM1 expression patterns (p= 0.296). In patients underwen platinum-based theraphy (n 91), a significant correlation was detected between low ERCC1 median High-scoring and longer progression time (TTP;9.6 v 5.3 months;P< .001) or overall survival (OS) (OS;18.1 v 9.1 months; P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between low TS protein expression and longer time progression (TTP; 11.8 v 5.4 months; P< .001) or OS (OS; 19.8 v 8.5 months; P <0.001) in patients undergoing pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy (n 55). Low RRM1 expression was accompanied by high progression free survival (TTP; 10.6 v 3.8 months) and OS (OS; 20.6 v 8.6 months) in patients receiving gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy. Based on the multivariate test results, the independent variables significantly affecting OS were tumor stage (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.9; p= 0.021) and ERCC1 (HR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.7-4.3; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Decreased TS protein expression can be indicative of greater responsivness to pemtrexed and of longer TTP and OS in individuals with advanced MPM (locally progressed or metastatic) who are receiving pemetrexed-based chemotheraphy. Low ERCC1 expressions in individuals with advanced MPM can predict increased PFS and OS, as well as a better responsivness to platinum-based chemotherapy. In patients with progressed MPM receiving gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy, lower RRM1 expression was associated with a better prognosis, longer PFS, and longer OS.

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a cancer with a high mortality rate and few therapeutic options. After platinum-pemetrexed combination, no further promising drug seems to be effective. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have some activity in pretreated patients and no data are available in this population about durvalumab., Materials and Methods: DIADEM was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of durvalumab. Patients with locally advanced/metastatic MPM who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy were enrolled to receive durvalumab (1500 mg, intravenously Q4W) for 12 months or until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and free from progression at 16 weeks (PFS 16wks ) calculated from treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, and safety., Results: Sixty-nine patients with a median age of 69 years (range 44-82 years) were enrolled; 62 patients (89.9%) had epithelioid histotype. As first-line treatment, all patients received platinum derivatives-pemetrexed combination (60.9% with carboplatin and 39.1% with cisplatin). As of March 2021, the median follow-up was 9.2 months (interquartile range 5.2-11.1 months). Six patients (8.7%) completed the 12-month treatment; 60 patients discontinued, of whom 42 for progressive disease, and 4 died. Seventeen patients (28.3%; 95% confidence interval 17.5% to 41.4%) were alive or free from progression at 16 weeks. Eleven patients (18.6%) had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE), and one (1.4%) had a grade ≥3 immune-related, treatment-related AE. There was one drug-related death., Conclusion: Durvalumab alone in pretreated non-selected MPM did not reach a meaningful clinical activity, showing any new major safety issue signals., Competing Interests: Disclosure PAZ declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and for the participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Bayer; FG declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astra Zeneca and Eli Lilly; ER, FG, IDS, and LC declare that funding was given to Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS to partially support the study; DLC declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and for the participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Amgen, Roche, and Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Unresectable pleural mesothelioma is a poor prognosis disease. Improvement in overall survival (OS) has been shown with PEMETREXED combined with CISPLATIN. BEVACIZUMAB combined with chemotherapy is associated with an improvement in OS, compared to chemotherapy alone, but is not supported by health insurance everywhere., Areas Covered: Immune Checkpoint Inhibition (ICI) monotherapy seemed to be promising but is controversial. ICI combination showed significant results. NIVOLUMAB, an anti-Programmed-Death-receptor 1, associated with IPILIMUMAB, an anti-Cytotoxic-T-Lymphocyte-Associated-protein 4, was evaluated in two phase II trials and a phase III trial, recently published. This combination led to a significant benefit in survival in first line compared to chemotherapy (OS 18.1 months (95%CI (16.8-21.4)) vs 14.1 (95%CI (12.4-16.2) HR 0.74 (95%CI 0.6-0.91) p = 0.002)., Expert Opinion: These results represent a big step in unresectable pleural mesothelioma. The benefit in non-epithelioid subtype is impressive (OS 18.1 months (95%CI 12.2-22.8) vs 8.8 months 95%CI (7.4-10.2) HR 0.46 (95%CI (0.31-0.68))). Benefit in epithelioid subtype (OS 18.7 months 95%CI (16.9-22) vs 16.5 95%CI (14.9-20.5) HR 0.86 95%CI (0.69-1.08)) is similar to the benefit of the combination of BEVACIZUMAB and chemotherapy. Identification of predictive biomarkers is needed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from each therapeutic strategy.