Search

Background: The release of ATP from dying cancer cells in response to platinum-based chemotherapy increases extracellular immunosuppressive adenosine (A), which binds to and activates the A2a and A2b receptors on immune cells resulting in an ineffective anti-tumor immune response. Concomitant adenosine receptor blockade may therefore enhance the therapeutic efficacy of some chemotherapeutic agents. AB928, the first clinical-stage small molecule dual adenosine receptor antagonist, is highly potent, pharmacodynamically active, and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as a single agent or in combination with chemo/immunotherapy. Methods: ARC-3 (NCT03720678) is a Phase 1/1b, open-label study in participants (pts) with advanced CRC. Phase 1 escalation identified AB928 150 mg orally once daily as the recommended dose in combination with standard mFOLFOX-6. Phase 1b expansion is ongoing and includes at least 15 and up to 40 pts. Eligible pts must have unresectable or mCRC, ECOG performance status 0-1, and at least one RECIST measurable lesion. Phase 1 eligibility included up to 5 lines of prior therapy; Phase 1b is similarly scoped. Exploratory biomarker analyses include immunohistochemistry of the adenosine axis, tumoral next gene sequencing, and tumor/blood immune correlates. Results: As of 27Dec19, 21 pts received AB928 150 mg + mFOLFOX-6: 7 in Phase 1 and 14 in Phase 1b. All previously treated pts (n=12) were FOLFOX- and/or FOLFIRI-experienced. Prior metastatic therapies range from 3 to 5 in Phase 1 escalation and 0 to 3 in Phase 1b expansion. Adverse events (AEs) reported in >30% of pts included fatigue, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. AEs related to AB928 occurred in 13 pts and were mostly mild to moderate. AB928-related Grade 3 AEs reported by 3 pts were diarrhea, AST increase, and neutropenia; there were no Grade 4-5 AB928-related AEs. Out of 15 evaluable pts, by investigator assessment, the disease control rate was 100% with 2 partial responses (13%; 1 confirmed, 1 pending confirmation) and 13 stable disease (87%). Of pts with stable disease, 6/13 (46%) had tumor shrinkage >15%. Median time on treatment was 15.4 (range: 1.7 - 40.6+) and 11.9 (range: 2.7 - 15.7+) weeks for Phase 1 and Phase 1b, respectively, with initiation of Phase 1b dosing on 09Sep19. Enrollment up to 40 pts is proceeding based on early efficacy gates; 15 pts are currently receiving study treatment. Conclusions: AB928 with mFOLFOX-6 has been well tolerated without significant evidence of additive toxicity in pts with mCRC. Combination treatment was associated with disease control in all evaluable pts, including those with microsatellite stable and RAS/BRAF mutated mCRC. Additional updates on the safety, clinical activity, and correlative biomarker results for all escalation/expansion pts will be presented. Citation Format: Michael Cecchini, Manuel Modiano, Fadi Braiteh, Olivia S. Gardner, Houston N. Gilbert, Daniel DiRenzo, Lisa Seitz, Matt J. Walters, Fangfang Yin, Rachel Woloski, Melissa C. Paoloni, Ki Y. Chung. Efficacy and safety of AB928 plus modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6) in participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Initial results at the recommended dose for expansion (ARC-3) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-387.

Background: Gut microbiome composition affects response to PD-1 blockade; and recent proof of concept studies suggest that gut microbiome manipulation is effective in reversing resistance to PD-1 blockade. VE800 is an oral live biotherapeutic consisting of 11 distinct non-pathogenic, non-toxigenic, commensal bacterial strains manufactured in lyophilized form. VE800 induces CD8+ T cell infiltrate into tumors; and significantly enhances anti-tumor activity of PD-1 blockade preclinically in multiple tumor models in a CD103+ dendritic cell and major histocompatibility (MHC) class I dependent fashion (Tanoue et al., 2019). Retrospective analysis of cancer patient's (pt) samples also suggests that greater VE800 strain abundance is associated with improved response to PD-1 blockade. The objective of this phase I study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of VE800 administered orally in combination with nivolumab in pts with select cancers. Methods: CONSORTIUM-IO (NCT04208958) is an open-label, first-in-human study evaluating VE800 and nivolumab combination in pts with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 relapsed/refractory melanoma, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 naïve gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 naïve microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer. Following a 5-day course of oral vancomycin 125mg QID, VE800 will be administered daily along with nivolumab (480mg Q4W). A single dose level of VE800 will be evaluated. In the interests of maximizing safety, a Simon 2-stage design will be used for each disease cohort. Although no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are expected, the first 3 pts will be enrolled serially 1 week apart; and safety data of the first 6 pts will be reviewed prior to further accrual. Pts will continue to receive VE800/nivolumab combination until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints include safety, tolerability; and clinical activity by objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS); and metagenomic strain-level analysis of degree/duration of VE800 strain colonization. Exploratory endpoints include tumor and blood immunophenotyping, serum/stool metabolomics and global changes in fecal microbiome composition. CONSORTIUM-IO is currently actively enrolling pts. Citation Format: Diwakar Davar, Judy S. Wang, Michael Cecchini, Zev Wainberg, Martin Gutierrez, Anita Turk, Rose Szabady, Jason Norman, Bernat Olle, Bruce Roberts, Dmitri Bobilev. Consortium-IO: A safety and efficacy study of VE800 in combination with nivolumab in previously treated patients with select advanced metastatic cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT246.

e16052 Background: To assess microsatellite instability (MSI) and KRAS mutation prevalence, discrepancies and their impact on outcome in AJCC stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma (colorectal cancer; CRC). Methods: The 2010-2016 United States National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV CRC patients > 18yo and information on MSI and KRAS mutation. Microsatellite status was stratified as stable microsatellites (MSS, including low instability) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H). KRAS status was stratified as mutation and wildtype. Prevalence and discrepancies were evaluated according to patient demographics, US geography and CRC factors. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities, metastatic burden, CRC treatment, treatment center type, and year of CRC diagnosis. A priori, a statistical interaction test between microsatellite status, KRAS status and primary CRC site was planned. Results: Microsatellite/KRAS status was available for n = 10,844/n = 25,712 patients, respectively. OS was assessed in n = 5,904 patients with data on both microsatellite and KRAS status, and follow-up. Overall prevalence of MSI-H was 3.1% and KRAS mutation 42.4%. Microsatellite and KRAS status varied according to primary CR site, as presented in Table. Further variation was evident according to US-geography, with MSI-H rates ranging from 1.6% to 4.1%, and KRAS mutation rates ranging from 41.1% to 44%. On multivariable analyses, longer OS was observed in patients with KRAS wildtype versus mutation (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97 p = 0.004), MSS versus MSI-H (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.9, p = 0.003), and left-sided versus right-sided CRC (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.6-0.7, p < 0.001). The effect of KRAS mutation further varied with CRC site and microsatellite status (interaction p = 0.002). Conclusions: Depending on its primary site and US geography, stage IV CRC shows distinct mutational behavior. KRAS mutation, MSI-H, MSI-H and primary CRC sidedness independently affect overall survival and interact with distinct prognostic profiles. Generically classifying adenocarcinomas of different site as “CRC” might deprecate this diversity. [Table: see text]

770 Background: Patients (pts) receiving treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) experience significant symptoms, treatment related side effects and psychosocial burdens. The ASCO guidelines recommend early palliative care consultation (PCC) to improve quality of life and survival. However, limited real-world data is available regarding the timing of PCC, hospice enrollment and location of death (LOD) in pts with MPC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of pts treated with chemotherapy for MPC at the Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital and affiliated community care centers (CCC) from January 2011 to April 2019. Patient demographics, treatment dates, initial PCC, enrollment of hospice at the time of death and LOD were manually abstracted from the electronic medical record. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict for PCC and death outside the hospital. Results: Of 363 pts identified with MPC who received chemotherapy, 38% (138) had a PCC. 67% (93) of patients’ initial PCC was in the hospital versus 33% (45) in the outpatient setting. The median time from the start of first-line chemotherapy to the first PCC was 5.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2 – 12.9). The median time from the first PCC to death was 1.5 months (IQR 0.5 – 4.42). At the time of our analysis, 300 pts had died and of those 76% (229) were enrolled on hospice at the time of death while 24% (71) were not. With respect to LOD, 47% (139) of pts died at home with hospice, 31% (94) at an inpatient hospice facility and 22% (67) died in the hospital. Female gender was associated with an increased likelihood of a PCC (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.07-2.94, P = 0.026). Pts treated at a CCC were less likely to have a PCC (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.36, P < 0.001). A PCC was not associated with a higher likelihood of death outside the hospital (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.75-2.29, P = 0.346). Conclusions: Although most pts with MPC enroll in hospice, PCC is generally underutilized. In fact, many pts receive PCC near the end of life and in the hospital. Further studies are warranted to determine how best to incorporate early PCC to maximize supportive care for pts with MPC.

609 Background: While carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) can manifest throughout the human body, approximately 2/3 of these tumors arise in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods: The 2019 version of the National Cancer Database was searched for adult patients with carcinoid or neuroendocrine tumors of the GI tract. Tumor incidence, patient demographics, treatment and cancer variables of GI carcinoid/NETs were compared to other GI cancers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 101,744 patients were included. Carcinoid/NET incidence varied with primary location, with highest proportion in the small intestine (55.7% of all small intestinal cancers). Compared to other histologies, carcinoid/NETs were more common in younger patients (median age 60 vs. 68years, p < 0.001) and African Americans (18 vs 12%, p < 0.001). Median carcinoid/NET diameter 15mm vs. 40mm for other cancers (p < 0.001). Carcinoid/NETs were diagnosed at lower stages than other histologies (AJCC stage 3/4, 30% vs. 47%, p < 0.001), with most metastases in the liver (8.9%). Stage 1/2 carcinoid/NETs were most often treated by surgical resection with or without concurrent chemotherapy (65%; 22%), whereas stage 3/4 patients received chemotherapy alone or in combination with surgical resection more commonly (39%; 25%). After multivariable adjustment, primary cancer site emerged as an independent prognosticator: longest OS was observed in patients with carcinoid/NET of the small intestines (vs. colonic frame HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.37-0.44, p < 0.001). Comparable results were evident in patients with hepatic metastases (small intestines vs. colonic frame carcinoid/NETs; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.17-0.24, p < 0.001). Other independent OS prognosticators were patient age, gender, race and comorbidities, as well as tumor size, stage and treatment. Conclusions: Compared to other GI-associated tumors, carcinoid/NETs are more common in younger patients, African Americans, diagnosed with smaller diameter at low stage. Carcinoid/NETs of the small intestines are associated with improved overall survival compared to other primary disease sites.

769 Background: FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GN) are established first line (1L) therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) but real-world data on their comparative effectiveness is limited. Methods: All cases of MPC treated with 1L FFX or GN at Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital and the affiliated community care centers (CCC) from January 2011 – April 2019 were reviewed. Patient (pt) demographics, prior therapy, initial and subsequent dose reductions (DR), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), overall survival (OS), and second line (2L) treatment data were manually abstracted from the electronic medical record. Categorical and continuous variables were compared between 1L FFX and GN cohorts via the Chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Median OS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 363 MPC pts treated with 1L FFX or GN; 269 (74%) pts were treated with FFX and 94 (26%) with GN as 1L therapy. 204 (56%) pts were treated at the main campus and 159 (44%) at a CCC. Demographics and baseline characteristics (FFX/GN) were as follows: gender (male) 55% / 41%; race (white) 82% / 77%; age < 76 90% / 71% ( P < 0.001). 332 (91%) of pts received no prior therapy; 21 (6%) had prior surgery plus adjuvant gemcitabine and 10 (3%) had surgery alone. 98% of FFX-treated pts were treated with upfront DR, compared to 78% of GN-treated pts ( P= 0.003). 78% and 53% of FFX-treated and GN-treated pts, respectively, had subsequent DR ( P< 0.001). Median TTD was 4.8 months with FFX and 3.4 months with GN ( P= 0.0029) and the median OS was 11.3 months with FFX versus 7.2 months with GN ( P < 0.0001). After 1L, 33% and 61% of FFX- and GN-treated pts, respectively, received no further chemotherapy ( P< 0.001). Conclusions: In the largest manually abstracted retrospective analysis to date, MPC pts treated with 1L FFX were younger, more likely to receive 2L therapy, and had increased survival compared to pts treated with GN. The OS of pts treated with FFX was similar to the OS reported by Conroy et al despite upfront dose attenuations in 98% of pts. A randomized trial is needed to confirm optimal sequencing of chemotherapy in MPC.

The 2018 Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development (AAADV) Workshop assembled a panel of experts for an in-depth discussion session to present “Challenges with Novel Clinical Trial Designs.” This panel offered assessments of the challenges faced by industry, the FDA, investigators, institutional review boards, and patients. The panel focused on master protocols, which include umbrella trials, platform trials, and basket trials. Umbrella trials and platform trials share many commonalities, whereas basket trials are more distinct. Umbrella and platform trials are generally designed with multiple arms where patients of the same histology or other unifying characteristics are enrolled into different arms and multiple investigational agents are evaluated in a single protocol. In contrast, basket studies generally enroll patients with different tumor types based on the presence of a specific mutation or biomarker regardless of histology; these trials may include expansion cohorts. These novel designs offer the promise of expedited drug assessment and approval, but they also place new challenges on all the stakeholders involved in the drug development process. Only by identifying the challenges of these complex, innovative clinical trial designs and highlighting challenges from each perspective can we begin to address these challenges. The 2018 AAADV Workshop convened a panel of experts from relevant disciplines to highlight the challenges that are created by master protocols, and, where appropriate, offer strategies to address these challenges.

Background: Hyperclustering of death receptor 5 (DR5) and subsequent induction of apoptosis, which normally occurs upon binding of its ligand TRAIL, can be mimicked by agonistic antibodies (Abs). However, clinical efficacy of conventional DR5 Abs has been disappointing. To improve antibody-mediated DR5 clustering on cancer cells, we utilized the HexaBody® antibody technology. This antibody platform is based on the discovery that IgG molecules can organize into hexamers through intermolecular Fc-Fc interactions upon binding to membrane-bound targets. HexaBody molecules are IgG1 Abs with a single point mutation in the Fc domain that enhances hexamerization. HexaBody-DR5/DR5 is a 1:1 mixture of two non-competing anti-DR5 HexaBody molecules that induces potent caspase-dependent apoptosis through hexamer-dependent hyperclustering of DR5 on the cell surface. We previously showed that HexaBody-DR5/DR5 induced superior potency compared to conventional DR5 antibodies in vitro and in vivo. Methods: To obtain preclinical proof-of-concept for targeting specific solid tumors using HexaBody-DR5/DR5, we performed a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse clinical trial (1 mouse per group design) using a large number of colorectal (CRC) (100), gastric (19), urothelial (13), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (90), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (20) PDX models. Results: HexaBody-DR5/DR5 showed potent anti-tumor activity (tumor stasis or tumor regression) in a substantial proportion of the CRC (36%), gastric (42%) and urothelial (54%) models. Additional in vivo studies comparing single vs multiple dosing demonstrated that maximal anti-tumor activity was already achieved after a single dose of HexaBody-DR5/DR5. A Phase 1/2 clinical trial to determine the RP2D and assess clinical safety of HexaBody-DR5/DR5 in cancer patients is currently ongoing (NCT03576131), from which a case study will be presented. Conclusions: Potent anti-tumor activity of HexaBody-DR5/DR5 was observed in large and diverse panels of CRC, gastric and urothelial PDX models, providing preclinical rationale for the clinical evaluation of HexaBody-DR5/DR5 in these indications. Citation Format: Marije B Overdijk, Michael Cecchini, Kristin Strumane, Marcel Brandhorst, Andreas Lingnau, Paul W.H.I. Parren, Merete Ellekilde-Pedersen, Ulf Forssmann, Tahamtan Ahmadi, A. Kate Sasser, Janine Schuurman, Esther C.W. Breij, Patricia LoRusso. HexaBody-DR5/DR5 (GEN1029) shows potent preclinical antitumor activity in a variety of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C025. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-C025

272 Background: Expert knowledge is often shared among academic oncologists at tumor boards (TBs) at National Cancer Institute Designated Cancer Centers (NCI-CCs), but not documented or made accessible to community oncologists. Using an oncologist-only question and answer (Q&A) website, we sought to disseminate expert insights from TBs at NCI-CCs to provide educational benefit to the oncology community. Methods: A process was designed with faculty at 11 NCI-CCs to document and share discussions from TBs focused on areas of clinical complexity and practice variation on theMednet.org, an interactive Q&A website of over 8,700 US oncologists. One faculty member from each TB was selected as a site leader. She or he distilled discussions about patient management from the TB into a question that addressed the clinical situation being discussed. After the question was posted, faculty at the participating NCI-CCs were asked to answer the question on theMednet. Answers were peer reviewed, indexed, stored and disseminated via email newsletters to registered oncologists. Community engagement was measured by Q&A page views, upvotes of Q&A, and poll participation. Results: A total of 15 Breast, Thoracic, and Gastrointestinal programs from 11 NCI-CCs participated. Between 12/2016 and 5/2019, faculty highlighted 146 questions from their TBs. Q&A were viewed 43,291 times by 3,585 oncologists including 2,264 community oncologists. One hundred and eighty-four answers are posted by 56 academic physicians and peer reviewed by 76 academic physicians. One hundred and eighty-five publications were cited. Community oncologists upvoted Q&A 808 times and voted in 45 polls related to the questions 1,667 times. Viewership of NCI-CC Q&A increased by 419% over time. Q&A were repeatedly searched and viewed, with 90% of all TB Q&A viewed every month. Conclusions: Via the online Q&A theMednet platform, NCI-CC providers effectively made expert knowledge easily accessible to community oncologists across the US. Timely access to evidence based recommendations from expert faculty can inform future practice choices in the community. [Table: see text]

437 Background: Induction FFX for PC deemed either BR or LA at diagnosis provides an opportunity to downstage pts with the aim of an R0 surgery. The addition of RT after induction FFX may further downstage. However, there is a paucity of data regarding long-term survival for BR and LA patients successfully downstaged and resected. We performed a retrospective review of BR and LA PC treated with induction FFX +/- RT followed by surgery or consolidative RT at the Yale Cancer Center (YCC) to assess survival in these two cohorts. Methods: Clinical data was abstracted for pts with BR or LA PC who had surgery or received consolidative RT without surgery after induction FFX +/- RT at the YCC from 2010-2018. Surgical pts were re-reviewed by a radiologist to assess vascular involvement (BR vs. LA) using NCCN criteria. PFS and OS for surgery and consolidative RT were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was compared via the log rank test. Results: 102 pts met inclusion criteria (BR=47, LA=55), 41 pts had surgery [BR=29/47 (62%) LA=12/55 (22%)] and 61 pts had consolidative RT [(BR= 18/47 (38%), LA= 43/55 (78%)] after induction FFX. 18 surgery pts received RT prior to resection and all surgery pts had R0 resection. Median follow up was 25 mo (range 5 – 97). Median PFS with surgery was 22 mo (95% CI 15 – 59) vs 14 mo (95% CI 10.9 – 20.1) with consolidative RT (p

630 Background: TAS-102 is an oral combination of the anti-metabolite 5-trifluorothymidine (FTD) and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (TPI), preventing the degradation of FTD. It is approved as mCRC monotherapy with improved survival. Oxaliplatin is often reintroduced in mCRC after progressive disease (PD) on maintenance 5-FU although response is poor. The decreased efficacy may be related to acquired 5-FU resistance. We therefore explored the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with an alternative and non cross-resistant anti-metabolite, TAS-102. Methods: Phase 1 of TAS-OX is a 3+3 dose-escalating study at a starting dose of TAS-102 25 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 with three dose levels (table). TAS-102 is administered days 1-5 and oxaliplatin day 1, every 2 weeks. Eligible patients previously received 5FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, appropriate biologics, had measurable disease, usual laboratory parameters, and ECOG PS 0-1. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Results: Twelve patients were evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT). No DLTs were observed. Treatment related grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (n = 4) and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). No AEs resulted in treatment discontinuation. Two patients (dose levels 2 and 3) required dose reductions for prolonged neutropenia. Median number of cycles for all treated patients was 6 ± 4. The disease control rate (DCR) at 8 weeks was 67%. Best response in all evaluable patients was 1 PR (8%) 7 (59%) SD and 4 (33%) PD. Conclusions: The RP2D of TAS-102 is 35 mg/m2 in combination with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. No DLTs were observed and no unexpected AEs were seen. The DCR in this heavily pretreated patient population is encouraging. Phase II is now enrolling at this dose (NCT 02848079). Clinical trial information: NCT02848079. [Table: see text]

Background TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride; a novel combination oral nucleoside anti-tumor agent) has recently received regulatory approval for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Internal review of data at a single-institution showed a trend towards better overall survival (OS) for patients who experienced chemotherapy-induced neutropenia at 1-month (CIN-1-month). To explore this finding further, a cohort study was designed based on outcome data from three centers in United States and one from Japan. Methods CIN-1-month after starting TAS-102 was defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03 as a neutrophil count decrease of ≥ grade 2 (absolute neutrophil count

To the editor: The widespread implementation of electronic medical records (EMR) allow providers ready access to large amounts of patient information, and for some specialties much of the data needed to provide recommendations can be gathered electronically.[1][1] Electronic consultation (e-consult

TPS4137Background: Gastric cancer remains a significant health problem in the US and globally with more than 951,600 annual cases worldwide. Moreover, the incidence of GEJ-centered adenocarcinoma i...

61 Background: Early results from recent studies using immune checkpoint blockade targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) have suggested that pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcomas may have response rates of over 40%. As of now predictive biomarkers for response and resistance have been incompletely characterized. Methods: A 58-year-old man who received radiation for a head and neck squamous cell cancer, developed a radiation-induced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) in his neck in 2014. His sarcoma was resected but recurred in 2015. He received adjuvant radiation after surgical debulking in September 2015 and was found on radiation simulation scan to have new widespread metastatic disease involving liver, lung, and bone. He started treatment on nivolumab in November 2015 and has had a sustained near complete response in all lesions. Results: All sites had a near complete response to nivolumab treatment. Pre treatment tissue analysis revealed no mutations or amplifications in 134 cancer-related genes, on the Oncomine Assay (Life Technologies, Inc.). Normal tissue was noted to be heterozygous for BRCA2 N372H, while the allelic fraction of the 372H variant in the tumor was found to be 85%. Programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1) immunohistochemistry staining of the tumor tissue was negative. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were not noted in the tumor tissue specimen. Conclusions: This patient exhibited a near complete response to all sites of disease, with remaining PET avidity in a single hilar node. The role of the BRCA2 variant and radiation just prior to starting nivolumab is unknown. BRCA2 N372H is a common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the population with a minor allele frequency of 0.25. Although the effect of the 372H variant on BRCA2 protein structure is predicted to be minimal, population studies have suggested a slightly increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer in homozygotes. It is possible that the radiation treatment to the site of recurrence in the head and neck, resulted in an abscopal effect enhancing the therapeutic effect of nivolumab therapy. Additional testing on his tissue is being done to further investigate the response.

Background: Yellow nail syndrome (YNS) is a rare clinical entity of unknown etiology that is characterized by a triad of yellow nails, respiratory manifestations, and lymphedema. The condition appears in the mid- to later years of life and only rarely in childhood. We describe a rare case of YNS with an atypical clinical presentation consisting of only yellow and dystrophic nails in a 2- year-old female since birth. Objective: A case of congenital YNS with only dystrophic and yellow nails is reported. Methods and Results: A 2-year-old female presented with yellow nails since birth. There was no positive family history. Physical examination revealed 20 thickened, dystrophic, yellow nails with onycholysis. There was no evidence of respiratory manifestations or lymphedema. Conclusion: Although rare, YNS can present as a congenital clinical entity and persist after birth. Pediatric patients with YNS show different clinical manifestations than the classic adult patient. The presence of yellow and dystrophic nails in the absence of respiratory and lymphatic manifestations may be the only sign of pathology and warrants close monitoring as progression to more serious complications can occur.

e15124Background: TAS-102 (tri-fluoro-thymidine and tipiracil hydrochloride; a novel combination oral nucleoside anti-tumour agent) was recently approved for patients with refractory metastatic col...

e18188Background: Multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) meetings have become a standard for evidence based decision making at medical centers worldwide. We believe that the expertise at subspecialty ...

Current low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis procedures are expensive and time consuming. We report here a novel technique to detect and separate nanoparticles using solid state nanopores. Our technique relies on the resistive pulse phenomenon used in coulter counters. We used a 150nm diameter nanopore to detect nanoparticles that closely resembled HDL and LDL in terms of their size and surface charge. Statistical analysis of the translocation data revealed that our setup preferentially allowed the particles resembling HDL to pass thorough while restricting the translocation of the particles that resembled LDL.Copyright © 2008 by ASME

Introduction: Electronic consultation (e-consult) is a healthcare delivery method in which a consultant provides input on the management of a patient by reviewing the medical chart without a face to face visit. This method is especially suited to systems that use a comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR). E-consults have the potential to improve efficiency and timeliness of care, save costs, prevent unnecessary patient visits, and address shortage of specialists. They may be especially valuable in rural areas, and for patients who have difficulty traveling. Published data regarding the utility and efficacy of remote hematology consultations are limited. At the VA Connecticut Healthcare System (VACT) electronic hematology consultations were initiated in July of 2011 as part of a national program. Providers are allowed to choose between referring their patient to a face to face visit or an e-consult, based on their clinical judgment and their patients’ preferences. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of electronic hematology consultation on patient care, to measure its effect on the face-to-face encounters at the VACT hematology clinics, and to assess provider and patient satisfaction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 300 patients who had a hematology e-consult between the years 2011 to 2013 at VACT. Data abstracted included demographics, diagnoses, timeliness of care, and need for face to face visits. In addition patient and provider satisfaction were evaluated by anonymous surveys. Hematology e-consults were performed by board eligible/certified hematologists based on review of the EMR and peripheral blood smears as appropriate. When necessary, recommendations were made to refer a patient for a face to face evaluation in the hematology clinic. Our study was approved by our local IRB. Results: The most common reason for a hematology e-consult was anemia (25%), followed by anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism (14%), thrombocytopenia (8%), erythrocytosis (7%), leukocytosis (6%), paraproteinemia (6%), neutropenia (6%), pancytopenia (2%), abnormal iron indices (2.5%) and abnormal coagulation profiles (2%). Additional reasons included thrombocytosis, macrocytosis, lymphocytosis, eosinophilia, thalassemia, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and hemoglobinopathies. The vast majority of patients were male (95%) with an average age of 63 +16 years. Average distance between the patients’ homes to our medical center was 36.6+22 miles. Electronic hematology consultations were completed on average within 16 days. We observed that implementation of hematology e-consults was accompanied by a 15% decrease in the annual number of face to face hematology visits (from 377 in 2011 to 319 in 2013), while the number of Veterans enrolled at VACT during that period did not change significantly. Only in 42 patients (14%) a face to face hematology consultation was recommended after completion of the e-consult. Of the 50 patients that were sent satisfaction surveys, completion rate was 34% and 65% replied that they preferred an e-consult over a face to face visit. Among 61 providers that received surveys, 15 (25%) responded and 100% indicated that they were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the process. Conclusions: Our study suggests that electronic hematology consultation can address many common hematology diagnoses and can prevent the need for a face to face visit in the majority of patients selected for an e-consult by their referring providers. These consultations can be provided without compromising patient and provider satisfaction and may decrease the need for face to face visits. This could have important implications for the delivery of hematology care, especially in healthcare systems that utilize an EMR. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Metastatic melanoma is frequently treated with immune activating therapy, which poses a theoretical risk of inducing graft versus host disease (GVHD) in those who have received allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The literature reporting the safety of immunotherapy in post transplant patients is limited. We report two patients with metastatic melanoma who received treatment with immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation that did not result in GVHD.