Search

Biliary amputation neuroma is a rare benign tumor that develops due to the peribiliary dissection of nerve fibers during cholecystectomy, a common bile duct surgery, or lymph node dissection performed in gastric cancer surgery. We report a case of amputation neuroma that presented a challenging differential diagnosis from perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. A 64-year-old man, who had undergone open cholecystectomy 30 years ago, was incidentally found to have a bile duct tumor during computed tomography (CT) following surgery for renal cell carcinoma. He had no specific symptoms, and blood test results showed only a slight elevation in alkaline phosphatase levels. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a 10-mm solid tumor with contrast effect in the common bile duct. On cholangiography, the tumor appeared as a protruding lesion with a smooth surface unilaterally. Given the atypical findings suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma, three bile duct biopsies were performed. Pathological examination did not rule out adenocarcinoma. The patient opted for surgery;however, an intraoperative rapid histological examination confirmed a benign disease, thereby avoiding extensive surgery. Consequently, a minimally invasive bile duct resection was performed. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed the tumor to be an amputation neuroma. Biliary amputation neuromas are characterized as unilateral protruding lesions with contrast effect or benign strictures. If such findings are observed in a patient with a history of surgery around the bile duct, the possibility of an amputation neuroma should be considered. However, completely ruling out malignancy preoperatively, even when suspecting amputation neuroma, can be challenging;therefore, considering surgery to achieve a definitive diagnosis is reasonable. During surgery, a rapid intraoperative histological examination is useful to avoid extensive procedures. In conclusion, diagnosing an amputation neuroma before surgery can be difficult, as it can mimic malignant tumors such as bile duct cancers. In this case, although a preoperative diagnosis of amputation neuroma was not feasible, performing a rapid intraoperative pathological examination helped avoid extensive surgery.

Background and Aim: Right colon polyps can especially be overlooked when they are located on the backs of haustral folds. Previous studies have reported that repeated forward-view examinations in the right colon were effective in reducing adenoma miss rates. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of retroflexion in the right colon after repeated forward-view examinations., Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted at three institutions in Kumamoto, Japan, between February 2014 and December 2015. Subjects who were over 40 years old and scheduled for colonoscopy were recruited. For the forward view, after cecal intubation, the colonoscope was withdrawn to the hepatic flexure. The colonoscope was sequentially reinserted to the cecum and then withdrawn to the hepatic flexure. For the retroflexion view (RV), the colonoscope was reinserted to the cecum, retroflexed, and then withdrawn to the hepatic flexure. All polyps were resected at the time of detection. The primary outcome of this study was the adenoma miss rate for the repeated forward-view examinations., Results: Of the 777 enrolled participants, retroflexion was successful in 730 (94.0%). The repeated forward-view withdrawal technique detected 291 adenomas, while the third withdrawal in the RV detected 53. The adenoma miss rate for the repeated forward-view withdrawal was 15.4%. No severe adverse events occurred during retroflexion., Conclusion: Because adenomas located on potential blind spots can be missed when only using forward-view examinations, retroflexion in the right colon after repeated forward-view examinations might improve colonoscopy detection rates.

A 29-year-old pregnant woman was referred to our hospital with suspected acute pancreatitis. On admission, the serum levels of pancreatic enzyme, total cholesterol and triglyceride were markedly elevated, which suggesting acute pancreatitis with hyperlipidemia. Treatment consisted of continuous hemodiafiltration, LDL apheresis, heparin and insulin combination therapy. On the 24th day of hospitalization, a cesarean section delivery resulted in the birth of a healthy infant. We reported a case of hyperlipidemia-induced acute pancreatitis in a woman with second trimester pregnancy, where multidisciplinary treatment was quite effective.