Search

We summarize the evidence for the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with and without ultrasound-assisted therapy for treating submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in a systematic review. The primary efficacy outcome was mortality. Outcomes were pooled across studies with the random-effects model. Twenty-four studies enrolled 700 patients in total; 653 received mechanical thromboembolectomy treatments for PE (mortality rate, 9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-13%], P = .12; rate of minor complications, 6% [95% CI, 2%-13%]). In the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) studies, the mortality rate was 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) and in the non-USAT studies, it was 9% (95% CI, 6%-13%). Secondary safety outcomes were all bleeding events, which occurred in 12% (95% CI, 7%-20%) of the USAT studies and in 10% (95% CI, 5%-20%) of the non-USAT studies. Current clinical evidence does not prove USAT is superior over CDT methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mentoring plays an important role in career success of academic medical faculty. New mentoring models such as peer mentoring have emerged. Aim: To evaluate the long-term impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic achievements. Method: Women faculty at the instructor or assistant professor rank were recruited to voluntarily participate in a facilitated peer mentoring program. Recruitment occurred over 3.8 years between 2005 and 2009. A 26-item questionnaire to assess academic skill, career satisfaction, and self-efficacy was administered before program participation and again with seven additional questions in 2011. Curriculum vitae were reviewed retrospectively to tally peer-reviewed publications, other academic activities, and promotions. Results: Participants had long-term improvement in their perceived mastery of academic skills. Peer-reviewed publications, book chapters, abstracts, posters, and other academic activities increased when activities before the program were compared to those in the five years after program enrollment. At follow-up, participants reported positive perceptions of the program and 44% continued to work with their original peer mentor groups. Conclusions: Involvement in the facilitated peer mentoring program was associated with increased skills and academic activities for most participants. Future studies are needed to assess its applicability and success among various demographic groups in academic medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid eye movement sleep-related bradyarrhythmia syndrome is a rare condition marked by abnormal sinus arrest or atrioventricular conduction disturbance blocks during REM sleep unassociated with sleep disordered breathing. We present a case of a young man without a cardiovascular history exhibiting pauses of up to 9.7 seconds during polysomnography (PSG). Initially referred for suspected obstructive sleep apnea due to nocturnal awakenings with shortness of breath, confusion, and dizziness. PSG results were unremarkable apart from electrocardiogram findings revealing prolonged sinus pauses related to REM sleep. Evaluation via extended 14-day patch monitor revealed an overall normal sinus rhythm with the lowest heart rate recorded at 14 beats per minute and 412 pauses exceeding 2 seconds, with the longest pause lasting 12.5 seconds during nocturnal hours. A permanent pacemaker was considered, but after shared decision making with the patient, the decision was to continue monitoring without any intervention., (© 2024 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Objective: To determine if the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) predicts thromboembolism and death in patients without atrial fibrillation in a population with implantable cardiac monitoring devices., Patients and Methods: A retrospective review utilizing the Rochester Epidemiology Project research infrastructure was conducted to evaluate the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc tool as a predictor of mortality and ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism in patients without atrial fibrillation. An implantable device was required in the inclusion criteria to discern the absence of atrial fibrillation. The study period was January 1, 2004, through March 7, 2016., Results: The study population (N=1606) had a mean (SD) age of 69.8 (12.6) years and median follow-up of 4.8 years (range, 0-12 years; quartile 1, 2.6 years and quartile 3, 8.1 years). The number of thromboembolic and mortality events stratified by CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score groupings of 0 to 2 (399 patients), 3 to 5 (756 patients), and 6 to 9 (451 patients) were 12 (3.0%), 109 (14.4%), and 123 (27.3%) and 22 (5.5%), 205 (27.1%), and 214 (47.4%), respectively. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score predicted thromboembolism and death. The hazard ratios (HRs) for thromboembolic events for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores 3 to 5 and 6 to 9 were 4.84 (95% CI, 2.66-8.80) and 10.53 (95% CI, 5.77-19.21) (reference group, scores 0-2). The HRs for death for the corresponding score categories were 4.45 (95% CI, 2.86-6.91) and 8.18 (95% CI, 5.23-12.78). The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score also predicted development of atrial fibrillation, for which the HRs for scores 3 to 5 and 6 to 9 were 1.51 (95% CI, 1.13-2.00) and 2.17 (95% CI, 1.60-2.95)., Conclusion: The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc tool predicts thromboembolic events and overall mortality in patients without atrial fibrillation who have implantable devices., (Copyright © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be as effective as, and at times safer than, warfarin. Because DOACs do not require regular serum level monitoring, patients' interaction with the health care system may be reduced. To the authors' knowledge, although studies have evaluated warfarin adherence, few studies have evaluated the real-world adherence to DOACs., Objective: To evaluate whether a difference exists between medication adherence of patients taking DOACs vs patients taking warfarin., Methods: The electronic medical records of the Anticoagulation Clinic database at Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adults taking DOACs and a matching cohort taking warfarin between January 1, 2011, and December 30, 2013. The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 item, a validated medication adherence tool, was used to evaluate adherence in both cohorts, and the qualitative covariates were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression., Results: Of 324 surveys that were sent, 110 patients (34.0%) responded. Most patients took DOACs for atrial fibrillation, and few took DOACs for venous thromboembolism. Overall, 60 of 66 patients (90.9%) in the DOAC group and 42 of 44 patients (95.5%) in the warfarin group reported medium or high adherence. Difference in adherence scores between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=.8)., Conclusion: Similar adherence was noted between DOACs and warfarin regardless of the frequency of serum level monitoring.