51. Orthopaedic phenotyping of NGLY1 deficiency using an international, family-led disease registry
- Author
-
Steven L. Frick and Eli M. Cahan
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Adult ,Male ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Evidence-based medicine ,Movement disorders ,Adolescent ,Population ,Natural history ,lcsh:Medicine ,Disease ,030105 genetics & heredity ,Orthopaedics ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Disease registry ,Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation ,Rare Diseases ,Medicine ,Humans ,Peptide-N4-(N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminyl) Asparagine Amidase ,Standard of care ,Pharmacology (medical) ,education ,Child ,Musculoskeletal System ,Genetics (clinical) ,education.field_of_study ,Disease advocacy organizations ,business.industry ,Research ,lcsh:R ,Infant ,General Medicine ,Orthopedics ,Child, Preschool ,Cohort ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,NGLY1 deficiency ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Rare disease - Abstract
Background NGLY1 deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by loss in enzymatic function of NGLY1, a peptide N-glycanase that has been shown to play a role in endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation (ERAD). ERAD dysfunction has been implicated in other well-described proteinopathies, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease. The classical clinical tetrad includes developmental delay, hypolacrima, transiently elevated transaminases, and hyperkinetic movement disorders. The musculoskeletal system is also commonly affected, but the orthopaedic phenotype has been incompletely characterized. Best practices for orthopaedic clinical care have not been elucidated and considerable variability has resulted from this lack of evidence base. Our study surveyed patients enrolled in an international registry for NGLY1 deficiency in order to characterize the orthopaedic manifestations, sequelae, and management. Results Our findings, encompassing the largest cohort for NGLY1 deficiency to date, detail levels of motor milestone achievement; physical exam findings; fracture rates/distribution; frequency of motor skill regression; non-pharmacologic and non-procedural interventions; pharmacologic therapies; and procedural interventions experienced by 29 participants. Regarding the orthopaedic phenotype, at time of survey response, we found that over 40% of patients experienced motor skill regression from their peak. Over 80% of patients had at least one orthopaedic diagnosis, and nearly two-thirds of the total had two or more. More than half of patients older than 6 years had sustained a fracture. Related to orthopaedic non-medical management, we found that 93 and 79% of patients had utilized physical therapy and non-operative orthoses, respectively. In turn, the vast majority took at least one medication (including for bone health and antispasmodic therapy). Finally, nearly half of patients had undergone an invasive procedure. Of those older than 6 years, two-thirds had one or more procedures. Stratification of these analyses by sex revealed distinctive differences in disease natural history and clinical management course. Conclusions These findings describing the orthopaedic natural history and standard of care in patients with NGLY1 deficiency can facilitate diagnosis, inform prognosis, and guide treatment recommendations in an evidence-based manner. Furthermore, the methodology is notable for its partnership with a disease-specific advocacy organization and may be generalizable to other rare disease populations. This study fills a void in the existing literature for this population and this methodology offers a precedent upon which future studies for rare diseases can build.
- Published
- 2019