51. Can SOC modelling be improved by accounting for pedogenesis?
- Author
-
Christine Hatté, Emmanuel Opolot, Sebastian Doetterl, Jennifer W. Harden, Elizabeth K. Williams, Sophie Cornu, Pascal Boeckx, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, Jérôme Balesdent, Peter Finke, Department of Soil Management, Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Centre européen de recherche et d'enseignement des géosciences de l'environnement (CEREGE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Collège de France (CdF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), University of California [Merced], University of California, Laboratory of Applied Physical Chemistry, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE), Université Paris-Saclay-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Géochrononologie Traceurs Archéométrie (GEOTRAC), Université Paris-Saclay-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universität Augsburg [Augsburg], Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Collège de France (CdF (institution))-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of California [Merced] (UC Merced), University of California (UC), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Mean squared error ,Chronosequence ,Weathering ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,Soil Science ,Soil science ,010501 environmental sciences ,[SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study ,01 natural sciences ,Modelling ,[SDU.STU.GC]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Geochemistry ,Organic matter ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Pedogenesis ,Soil organic carbon ,Soil organic matter ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Soil carbon ,chemistry ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental science ,Information level ,[SDU.STU.MI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Mineralogy - Abstract
International audience; Recent findings suggest that soil organic carbon mineralization and stabilization depend to a substantial degree on the soil geochemistry and the degree of weathering. We hypothesized that this dependence can be translated to decay rate modifiers in a model context, and used data from the Merced chronosequence (CA, U.S.A., 100 yr-3 Myr), representing a weathering sequence, to test, on a 1000-year time scale for model spin-up, a simple soil organic carbon (SOC) model based on the RothC26.3 model concepts. Model performance was tested for four levels of information: (1) known decay rates for each model SOC pool at individual chronosequence locations, obtained by calibrating the model to measured SOC-fractions and measured site-specific C-inputs; (2) average decay rates for each SOC-pool, corrected per location with rate modifiers based on geochemical proxies and measured site-specific C-inputs; (3) uncorrected average decay rates per SOC-pool and measured site-specific C-inputs; (4) uncorrected average decay rates per SOC-pool and averaged C-inputs. A lumped root mean square error (RMSE) statistic was calculated for each information level. We found that using local measurements of fresh C-input led to a decrease in RMSE of near 15% relative to information level (4). Applying geochemical rate modifiers led to a further reduction of 20%. Thus, we conclude that there is a benefit of including geo-chemical rate modifiers in this SOC-model. We repeated this analysis for a five-pool and a four-pool SOC model that either included or excluded an inert organic matter pool. In terms of the lumped RMSE both models performed similarly, but by comparing measured and simulated percentage Modern Carbon (pMC) for bulk SOC we concluded that measured pMC was best approximated using a four-pool SOC model (without an Inert Organic Matter pool). Furthermore, it is likely that a five-pool model including a very slowly decaying pool would further improve model performance.
- Published
- 2018