51. Economic Spillovers From Public Investments in Medical Countermeasures: A Case Study of a Burn Debridement Product.
- Author
-
Farahati F, Nystrom S, Howell DR, and Jaffe R
- Subjects
- Burns economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Debridement methods, Disaster Planning economics, Disaster Planning trends, Humans, Public Health Administration economics, Public Health Administration methods, United States, Burns surgery, Debridement instrumentation, Debridement standards, Disaster Planning methods, Equipment and Supplies economics
- Abstract
Objective: The US federal government invests in the development of medical countermeasures for addressing adverse health effects to the civilian population from chemical, biological, and radiological or nuclear threats. We model the potential economic spillover effects in day-to-day burn care for a federal investment in a burn debridement product for responding to an improvised nuclear device., Methods: We identify and assess 4 primary components for projecting the potential economic spillover benefits of a burn debridement product: (1) market size, (2) clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, (3) product cost, and (4) market adoption rates. Primary data sources were the American Burn Association's 2015 National Burn Repository Annual Report of Data and published clinical studies used to gain European approval for the burn debridement product., Results: The study results showed that if approved for use in the United States, the burn debridement product has potential economic spillover benefits exceeding the federal government's initial investment of $24 million a few years after introduction into the burn care market., Conclusions: Economic spillover analyses can help to inform the prioritizing of scarce resources for research and development of medical countermeasures by the federal government. Future federal medical countermeasure research and development investments could incorporate economic spillover analysis to assess investment options. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:711-719).
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF