51. Effects of premotion silent period on single motor unit firing at initiation of rapid contraction
- Author
-
Hisashi Aoki, Tadaaki Mano, Kyonosuke Yabe, and Reiko Tsukahara
- Subjects
Soleus muscle ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,musculoskeletal, neural, and ocular physiology ,General Neuroscience ,Motor control ,Body movement ,Isometric exercise ,Electromyography ,musculoskeletal system ,Motor unit ,Gastrocnemius muscle ,Anesthesia ,Medicine ,Silent period ,Neurology (clinical) ,business - Abstract
We compared the single motor unit (SMU) activity between movements with a premotion silent period (PMSP) and without PMSP in EMG. Fourteen SMUs in the gastrocnemius muscle and 6 SMUs in the soleus muscle were recorded from 5 volunteers during isometric plantar flexion. Tonically firing SMUs failed to fire just before the onset of a rapid contraction with PMSP more frequently than without PMSP. SMUs tended to fire within 10 msec (the gastrocnemius SMUs) or 20 msec (the soleus SMUs) from the onset of the phasic EMG discharge when PMSP occurred. In a rapid contraction without PMSP, the initial firing of SMUs occurred with longer latency than that in a rapid contraction with PMSP. The latency of the initial SMU firing in a rapid contraction related to the preceding time of the last SMU firing during a sustained contraction to the onset of the phasic EMG discharge. When the preceding firing was long enough, the latency distributed around 10 msec. On the other hand, for shorter preceding times, the latency lengthened with shortening of the preceding time. It is suggested that the PMSP makes the preceding time long and increases the susceptibility of motor units to the descending command at the initiation of a rapid contraction.
- Published
- 1995