51. The BCS–Bose crossover theory
- Author
-
Francisco J. Sevilla, Sadhan K. Adhikari, M. de Llano, J. J. Valencia, and M. A. Solís
- Subjects
Condensed Matter::Quantum Gases ,Superconductivity ,Physics ,Condensed Matter::Other ,Condensed Matter - Superconductivity ,Crossover ,Fermi level ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Energy Engineering and Power Technology ,BCS theory ,Condensed Matter Physics ,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials ,law.invention ,Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con) ,symbols.namesake ,law ,Quantum mechanics ,symbols ,Without loss of generality ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Cooper pair ,Statistical theory ,Bose–Einstein condensate - Abstract
We contrast {\it four} distinct versions of the BCS-Bose statistical crossover theory according to the form assumed for the electron-number equation that accompanies the BCS gap equation. The four versions correspond to explicitly accounting for two-hole-(2h) as well as two-electron-(2e) Cooper pairs (CPs), or both in equal proportions, or only either kind. This follows from a recent generalization of the Bose-Einstein condensation (GBEC) statistical theory that includes not boson-boson interactions but rather 2e- and also (without loss of generality) 2h-CPs interacting with unpaired electrons and holes in a single-band model that is easily converted into a two-band model. The GBEC theory is essentially an extension of the Friedberg-T.D. Lee 1989 BEC theory of superconductors that excludes 2h-CPs. It can thus recover, when the numbers of 2h- and 2e-CPs in both BE-condensed and noncondensed states are separately equal, the BCS gap equation for all temperatures and couplings as well as the zero-temperature BCS (rigorous-upper-bound) condensation energy for all couplings. But ignoring either 2h- {\it or} 2e-CPs it can do neither. In particular, only {\it half} the BCS condensation energy is obtained in the two crossover versions ignoring either kind of CPs. We show how critical temperatures $T_{c}$ from the original BCS-Bose crossover theory in 2D require unphysically large couplings for the Cooper/BCS model interaction to differ significantly from the $T_{c}$s of ordinary BCS theory (where the number equation is substituted by the assumption that the chemical potential equals the Fermi energy)., thirteen pages including two figures. Physica C (in press, 2007)
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF