Search

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Bacterial nucleoid organization is believed to have minimal influence on the global transcription program. Using an altered bacterial histone-like protein, HUα, we show that reorganization of the nucleoid configuration can dynamically modulate the cellular transcription pattern. The mutant protein transformed the loosely packed nucleoid into a densely condensed structure. The nucleoid compaction, coupled with increased global DNA supercoiling, generated radical changes in the morphology, physiology, and metabolism of wild-type K-12 Escherichia coli . Many constitutive housekeeping genes involved in nutrient utilization were repressed, whereas many quiescent genes associated with virulence were activated in the mutant. We propose that, as in eukaryotes, the nucleoid architecture dictates the global transcription profile and, consequently, the behavior pattern in bacteria.

Most HIV transmission occurs on the mucosal surfaces of the gastrointestinal and cervicovaginal tracts, both of which are normally coated by a biofilm of nonpathogenic commensal bacteria. We propose to genetically engineer such naturally occurring bacteria to protect against HIV infection by secreting antiviral peptides. Here we describe the development and characterization of Nissle 1917, a highly colonizing probiotic strain of Escherichia coli , secreting HIV-gp41-hemolysin A hybrid peptides that block HIV fusion and entry into target cells. By using an appropriate combination of cis- and transacting secretory and regulatory signals, micromolar secretion levels of the anti-HIV peptides were achieved. The genetically engineered Nissle 1917 were capable of colonizing mice for periods of weeks to months, predominantly in the colon and cecum, with lower concentrations of bacteria present in the rectum, vagina, and small intestine. Histological and immunocytochemical examination of the colon revealed bacterial growth and peptide secretion throughout the luminal mucosa and in association with epithelial surfaces. The use of genetically engineered live microbes as anti-HIV microbicides has important potential advantages in economy, efficacy, and durability.

Molecular mechanisms of bacterial chromosome packaging are still unclear, as bacteria lack nucleosomes or other apparent basic elements of DNA compaction. Among the factors facilitating DNA condensation may be a propensity of the DNA molecule for folding due to its intrinsic curvature. As suggested previously, the sequence correlations in genome reflect such a propensity [Trifonov and Sussman (1980) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 77, 3816-3820]. To further elaborate this concept, we analyzed positioning of A-tracts (the sequence motifs introducing the most pronounced DNA curvature) in the Escherichia coli genome. First, we observed that the A-tracts are over-represented and distributed 'quasi-regularly' throughout the genome, including both the coding and intergenic sequences. Second, there is a 10-12 bp periodicity in the A-tract positioning indicating that the A-tracts are phased with respect to the DNA helical repeat. Third, the phased A-tracts are organized in approximately 100 bp long clusters. The latter feature was revealed with the help of a novel approach based on the Fourier series expansion of the A-tract distance autocorrelation function. Since the A-tracts introduce local bends of the DNA duplex and these bends accumulate when properly phased, the observed clusters would facilitate DNA looping. Also, such clusters may serve as binding sites for the nucleoid-associated proteins that have affinities for curved DNA (such as HU, H-NS, Hfq and CbpA). Therefore, we suggest that the approximately 100 bp long clusters of the phased A-tracts constitute the 'structural code' for DNA compaction by providing the long-range intrinsic curvature and increasing stability of the DNA complexes with architectural proteins.

Nucleoprotein complexes comprising short DNA loops (150 base pairs or less) are involved in a wide variety of DNA transactions (e.g. transcription regulation, replication and recombination) in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and also can be useful in designing nanostructures. In these higher-order nucleoprotein complexes, proteins bound to spatially separated sites on a DNA interact with each other by looping out the relatively stiff intervening DNA. Recent technological developments have enabled determination of DNA trajectories in a few DNA-loop-containing regulatory complexes. Results show that, in a given system, a specific DNA trajectory is preferred over others.

The lysogenic state of bacteriophage λ is exceptionally stable yet the prophage is readily induced in response to DNA damage. This delicate epigenetic switch is believed to be regulated by two proteins; the lysogenic maintenance promoting protein CI and the early lytic protein Cro. First, we confirm, in the native configuration, the previous observation that the DNA loop mediated by oligomerization of CI bound to two distinct operator regions ( O L and O R ), increases repression of the early lytic promoters and is important for stable maintenance of lysogeny. Second, we show that the presence of the cro gene might be unimportant for the lysogenic to lytic switch during induction of the λ prophage. We revisit the idea that Cro's primary role in induction is instead to mediate weak repression of the early lytic promoters.

Summary In August, more than 350 conferees from 24 countries attended the ASM Conference on the New Phage Biology, in Key Biscayne, Florida. This meeting, also called the Phage Summit, was the first major international gathering in decades devoted exclusively to phage biology. What emerged from the 5 days of the Summit was a clear perspective on the explosive resurgence of interest in all aspects of bacteriophage biology. The classic phage systems like λ and T4, reinvigorated by structural biology, bioinformatics and new molecular and cell biology tools, remain model systems of unequalled power and facility for studying fundamental biological issues. In addition, the New Phage Biology is also populated by basic and applied scientists focused on ecology, evolution, nanotechnology, bacterial pathogenesis and phage-based immunologics, therapeutics and diagnostics, resulting in a heightened interest in bacteriophages per se, rather than as a model system. Besides constituting another landmark in the long history of a field begun by d’Herelle and Twort during the early 20th century, the Summit provided a unique venue for establishment of new interactive networks for collaborative efforts between scientists of many different backgrounds, interests and expertise.

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), which activates transcription from the wild-type lacP1 promoter and most of its mutants, represses productive RNA synthesis from a lacP1 promoter variant that contains an extended -10 element, although CRP enhances RNA polymerase binding as well as open complex formation in both promoters. Moreover, abortive RNA synthesis, which is already higher in the extended -10 variant compared with the parent promoter, was further enhanced by CRP. These results, together with the observed decrease in productive RNA synthesis, indicate that CRP, while facilitating the earlier steps of initiation, inhibits transcription from the extended -10 lacP1 by hindering promoter clearance. We propose that CRP decreases energetic barriers to RNA polymerase binding, isomerization, and abortive RNA synthesis but stabilizes the abortive RNA initiating complex, which results in increasing the activation energy of the transition state before the elongation complex. The results demonstrate for the first time that a DNA-binding regulatory protein acts as an activator or a repressor in different steps of the transcription initiation pathway because of the energetic differences of the intermediate complex in the same promoter.

Summary To investigate the determining factors in the selection of the transcription start points (tsp) by RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli, we systematically deleted or substituted single base pairs (bps) at 25 putative critical positions in the two extended −10 promoters, P1 and P2, of the gal operon. These changes extend downstream from −24 to +1 of the P1 promoter. In vitro transcription assays using supercoiled DNA templates revealed a preference for a purine in the non-template strand for tsp in both promoters. The optimal tsp is the 11th bp counting downstream from the −10 position. A single bp deletion anywhere from −10 to +1 switched the tsp to the next available purine 2–3 bp downstream on the non-template strand whereas deleting a single bp at position from −24 to −11 did not affect the tsp. The nature of the 10 bp sequence of the −10 to −1 region, while affecting promoter strength, did not influence tsp. The cAMP–CRP complex, which stimulates P1 and represses P2, did not affect the tsp selection process. The rules of tsp selection by RNA polymerase containing σ70 in gal and pyr promoters discussed here may be applicable to others.

The Gal repressosome is a higher-order nucleoprotein complex that represses transcription of the gal operon in Escherichia coli. During the repressosome assembly, a DNA loop is formed by the interaction of two GalR dimers, bound to two spatially separated operators, OE and OI, flanking the gal promoters. Structure-based genetic analysis indicated that GalR homodimers interact directly and form a V-shaped stacked tetramer in repressosome, further stabilized by HU binding to an architecturally critical position on the DNA. In this scheme of GalR tetramerization, the alignment of the operators in the DNA loop could be in either parallel (PL) or antiparallel (AL) mode. As each mode can have two alternative geometries differing in the mutual stacking of the OE- and OI-bound GalR dimers, it is possible to have four different DNA trajectories in the repressosome. Feasibilities of these trajectories were tested by in vitro transcription repression assays, first by isolating GalR mutants with altered operator specificity and then by constructing four different potential loops with mutant GalR heterodimers bound to specifically designed hybrid operators in such a way as to give rise to only one of the four putative trajectories. Results show that OE and OI adopt a mutual antiparallel orientation in an under-twisted DNA loop, consistent with the energetically optimal structural model. In this structure the center of the HU-binding site is located at the apex of the DNA loop. The approach reported here can be used to distinguish between otherwise indistinguishable DNA trajectories in complex nucleoprotein machines.

The conserved A:T base pair at the -11 position of the promoters in Escherichia coli is very sensitive to substitutions. In vitro transcription with the galP1 promoter having a natural or unnatural base in either strand at position -11 showed that only a purine base with no side group at C2 in the nontemplate strand is transcriptionally potent; neither a purine with an amino group at C2 nor a pyrimidine support transcription. The amino group at C6 in the omnipresent adenine at -11 does not play any role in promoting transcription. The nature of the base, complementary or noncomplementary, at -11 in the template strand also does not influence transcription. We propose that the adenine, by becoming extrahelical, interacts with an amino acid(s) of the 2.3-2.4 region of sigma for which an unsubstituted C2 hydrogen is critical.

The mechanism of isomerization (basepair openings) during transcription initiation by RNA polymerase at the galP1 promoter of Escherichia coli was investigated by 2-aminopurine (2,AP) fluorescence. The fluorescence of 2,AP is quenched in DNA duplex and enhanced when the basepair is distorted or deformed. The increase of 2,AP fluorescence was used to monitor basepair distortion at several individual positions in the promoter. We observed that basepair distortions during isomerization are a multi-step process. Three distinct hitherto unresolved steps in kinetic terms were observed, where significant fluorescence change occurs: a fast step with a half-life of around 1 s, which is followed by two slower steps occurring with a half-life in the range of minutes at 25 degrees C. Contrary to commonly held expectations, basepairs at different positions opened by 2,AP assays without any obvious pattern, suggesting that basepair opening is an asynchronous multi-step process. cAMP.CRP, which activates transcription at galP1, enhanced the rate-limiting step.

We have determined the genome sequences of two closely related lytic bacteriophages, SP6 and K1-5, which infect Salmonella typhimurium LT2 and Escherichia coli serotypes K1 and K5, respectively. The genome organization of these phages is almost identical with the notable exception of the tail fiber genes that confer the different host specificities. The two phages have diverged extensively at the nucleotide level but they are still more closely related to each other than either is to any other phage currently characterized. The SP6 and K1-5 genomes contain, respectively, 43,769 bp and 44,385 bp, with 174 bp and 234 bp direct terminal repeats. About half of the 105 putative open reading frames in the two genomes combined show no significant similarity to database proteins with a known or predicted function that is obviously beneficial for growth of a bacteriophage. The overall genome organization of SP6 and K1-5 is comparable to that of the T7 group of phages, although the specific order of genes coding for DNA metabolism functions has not been conserved. Low levels of nucleotide similarity between genomes in the T7 and SP6 groups suggest that they diverged a long time ago but, on the basis of this conservation of genome organization, they are expected to have retained similar developmental strategies.

DNA looping is often involved in positive and negative regulation of gene transcription in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The transcription of the gal operon of Escherichia coli from two overlapping promoters P1 and P2 is negatively regulated via Gal repressosome assembly. It involves binding of two dimeric Gal repressor proteins (GalR) to two operators, O(E) and O(I), flanking the two promoters, and formation of 113 bp DNA loop due to tetramerization of the two bound GalR dimers. The process requires negatively supercoiled DNA and the presence of the histone-like protein HU. Previous modeling of the repressosome based on evaluation of DNA elastic energy suggested a mutual antiparallel, rather than parallel, orientation of the two gal operators in an under-twisted DNA loop. To visualize the Gal loop by atomic force microscopy (AFM), plasmid DNA molecules were constructed with increased distance between the two operators. The AFM results demonstrated the formation of an antiparallel DNA loop in the Gal repressosome consistent with our earlier hypothesis. Importantly, the overall shape of the GalR mediated loop proved to be indistinguishable from that in the chimerical loop of the same size containing two lac operators (instead of two gal operators) and formed by LacI. In addition, a possibility of the gal operon repression mediated by GalR in the absence of HU was shown in the new DNA constructs. Implications of these findings for the DNA structural organization in bacterial nucleoid are discussed.

We designed a bacteriophage lambda system to display peptides and proteins fused at the C terminus of the head protein gpD of phage lambda. DNA encoding the foreign peptide/protein was first inserted at the 3' end of a DNA segment encoding gpD under the control of the lac promoter in a plasmid vector (donor plasmid), which also carried lox P(wt) and lox P(511) recombination sequences. Cre-expressing cells were transformed with this plasmid and subsequently infected with a recipient lambda phage that carried a stuffer DNA segment flanked by lox P(wt) and lox P(511) sites. Recombination occurred in vivo at the lox sites and Amp(r) cointegrates were formed. The cointegrates produced recombinant phage that displayed foreign protein fused at the C terminus of gpD. The system was optimised by cloning DNA encoding different length fragments of HIV-1 p24 (amino acid residues 1-72, 1-156 and 1-231) and the display was compared with that obtained with M13 phage. The display on lambda phage was at least 100-fold higher than on M13 phage for all the fragments with no degradation of displayed products. The high-density display on lambda phage was superior to that on M13 phage and resulted in selective enrichment of epitope-bearing clones from gene-fragment libraries. Single-chain antibodies were displayed in functional form on phage lambda, strongly suggesting that correct disulphide bond formation takes place during display. This lambda phage display system, which avoids direct cloning into lambda DNA and in vitro packaging, achieved cloning efficiencies comparable to those obtained with any plasmid system. The high-density display of foreign proteins on bacteriophage lambda should be extremely useful in studying low-affinity protein-protein interactions more efficiently compared to the M13 phage-based system.

The overall topology of DNA profoundly influences the regulation of transcription and is determined by DNA flexibility as well as the binding of proteins that induce DNA torsion, distortion, and/or looping. Gal repressor (GalR) is thought to repress transcription from the two promoters of the gal operon of Escherichia coli by forming a DNA loop of ≈40 nm of DNA that encompasses the promoters. Associated evidence of a topological regulatory mechanism of the transcription repression is the requirement for a supercoiled DNA template and the histone-like heat unstable nucleoid protein (HU). By using single-molecule manipulations to generate and finely tune tension in DNA molecules, we directly detected GalR/HU-mediated DNA looping and characterized its kinetics, thermodynamics, and supercoiling dependence. The factors required for gal DNA looping in single-molecule experiments (HU, GalR and DNA supercoiling) correspond exactly to those necessary for gal repression observed both in vitro and in vivo . Our single-molecule experiments revealed that negatively supercoiled DNA, under slight tension, denatured to facilitate GalR/HU-mediated DNA loop formation. Such topological intermediates may operate similarly in other multiprotein complexes of transcription, replication, and recombination.

The effect of superhelicity of DNA templates on transcription is well documented in several cases. However, the amount of supercoiling that is needed to bring about any changes and the steps at which such effects are exerted were not systematically studied. We investigated the effect of DNA supercoiling on transcription from a set of promoters present on a plasmid by using a series of topoisomers with different superhelical densities ranging from totally relaxed to more than physiological. In vitro transcription assays with these topoisomers in the absence and presence of gene regulatory proteins showed that the effect of negative supercoiling on intrinsic transcription varies from promoter to promoter. Some of those promoters, in which DNA superhelicity stimulated transcription, displayed specific optima of superhelical density while others did not. The results also showed that the amounts of abortive RNA synthesis from two of the promoters decreased and full-length RNA increased with increasing supercoiling, indicating for the first time an inverse relationship between full-length and abortive RNA synthesis and supporting a role of DNA superhelicity in promoter clearance. DNA supercoiling might also influence the point of RNA chain termination. Furthermore, the effect of varying the amount of supercoiling on the action of gene regulatory proteins suggested the mode of action, which is consistent with previous results. Our results underscore the importance of DNA supercoiling in fine-tuning promoter activities, which should be relevant in cell physiology given that local changes in chromosomal supercoiling must occur in different environments.

It has been argued that genetic instability is required to generate the myriad mutations that fuel tumor initiation and progression and, in fact, patients with heritable cancer susceptibility syndromes harbor defects in specific genes that normally maintain DNA integrity. However, the vast majority of human cancers arise sporadically, in the absence of deficiencies in known “mutator” genes. We used a cII -based mutation detection assay to show that the mean frequency of forward mutations in primary mammary adenocarcinomas arising in mouse mammary tumor virus-c- erbB2 transgenic mice harboring multiple copies of the λ bacteriophage genome was significantly higher than in aged-matched, wild-type mammary tissue. Analysis of the cII mutational spectrum within the mammary tumor genomic DNA demonstrated a >6-fold elevation in transversion mutation frequency, resulting in a highly unusual inversion of the transition/transversion ratio characteristic of normal epithelium; frameshift mutation frequencies were unaltered. Arising oncogenic point mutations within the c- erbB2 transgene of such tumors were predominantly transversions as well. Data from this model system support the notion that elaboration of a mutator phenotype is a consequential event in breast cancer and suggest that a novel DNA replication/repair gene is a relatively early mutational target in c- erbB2 -induced mammary tumorigenesis.

Repression of transcription initiation from the two gal promoters, P1 and P2, requires binding of GalR protein to two flanking operators, O(E) and O(I), binding of HU to a site, hbs, located between the two operators, and supercoiled DNA template. Previous experiments suggested that repression involves the interaction of two DNA-bound GalR proteins, which generates a 113-bp DNA loop encompassing the promoter region. Interaction between two DNA-bound proteins would be allowed if the binding sites on DNA are properly aligned. To test the idea that the observed repression of gal transcription in vitro is mediated by DNA looping, we investigated the effect of changing the relative angular orientation of O(E) and O(I) in the DNA helix. We found that repression is a periodic function of the distance between the two operator sites. Since repression recurred commensurate with DNA helical repeat, we conclude that the observed in vitro repression is mediated by DNA looping and the in vitro conditions reflect the in vivo situation.

This chapter is the author's reflection of the pioneering work of Michael Yarmolinsky and Gerard Buttin in studying the galactose operon based on a few simple curiosities. The galactose (gal) operon was an example of an amphibolic operon. It encodes enzymes for the metabolism of the sugar D-galactose in Escherichia coli. D-Galactose is not only used as a carbon energy source, but its metabolic products are also precursors of biosynthetic glycosylation reactions. Most of the enzymes in the D-galactose metabolic pathway were first characterized by Luis Leloir. Glucose also affects the transcription of the gal operon via cAMP level in an unusual way if the inducer d-galactose is generated intracellularly without glucose interfering with the uptake, for example, by hydrolysis of lactose. Under conditions of UTP depletion created by the presence of D-galactose in GalE-deficient cells, the P2 promoter was specifically derepressed and makes more GalE enzyme to compensate for the deficiency. Higher concentrations of D-galactose release GalR from OE and the inhibitory GalR contact to RNA polymerase. The differential solo effects of GalR on the two gal promoters have physiological consequences. The internal inducer concentration is not high enough to break up the P1 repression by RNA polymerase contact but allows enhancement of P2-mediated GalE enzyme synthesis, making UDP-galactose and UDP-glucose for biosynthetic glycosylations from non-galactose carbons. It was observed that cells deleted for the galR gene and constitutive for gal expression can be further induced by exogenous D-galactose (ultra-induction).

Efficient repression of the two promoters P1 and P2 of the gal operon requires the formation of a DNA loop encompassing the promoters. In vitro, DNA looping-mediated repression involves binding of the Gal repressor (GalR) to two gal operators (OE and OI) and binding of the histone-like protein HU to a specific locus (hbs) about the midpoint between OE and OI, and supercoiled DNA. Without DNA looping, GalR binding to OE partially represses P1 and stimulates P2. We investigated the requirement for DNA supercoiling and HU in repression of the gal promoters in vivo in strains containing a fusion of a reporter gene, gusA or lacZ, to each promoter individually. While the P1 promoter was found to be repressible in the absence of DNA supercoiling and HU, the repression of P2 was entirely dependent upon DNA supercoiling in vivo. The P2 promoter was fully derepressed when supercoiling was inhibited by the addition of coumermycin in cells. P2, but not P1, was also totally derepressed by the absence of HU or the OI operator. From these results, we propose that the repression of the gal promoters in vivo is mediated by the formation of a higher order DNA-multiprotein complex containing GalR, HU and supercoiled DNA. In the absence of this complex, P1 but not P2 is still repressed by GalR binding to OE. The specific nucleoprotein complexes involving histone-like proteins, which repress promoter activity while remaining sensitive to inducing signals, as discussed, may occur more generally in bacterial nucleoids.

The GalR repressor regulates expression of genes of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli . We studied the regulatory effect of GalR in vitro on a heterologous promoter, lac UV5, by placing the GalR-binding site, O E , at different locations upstream of this promoter. Despite the fact that the lac UV5 promoter is transcribed efficiently by RNA polymerase (RNP) alone, GalR modulated transcription from many of the Plac UV5 variants. Depending on the location of O E and the neighboring DNA sequence, GalR repressed, activated or had no effect on the promoter. Both repression and activation involved formation of GalR–RNP–DNA ternary complexes and required an intact c-domain of the α subunit of the holoenzyme. These results support the differential contact model of a regulator action, in which a regulator differentially binds to, and lowers the energy of, intermediates of transcription initiation either to hinder or to facilitate a step of initiation. The nature of the contacts depends upon the context, i.e. the geometry of the ternary complex. The observed repression and activation effect of GalR on a heterologous promoter also underscores the point that a regulator is not a dedicated protein for repression or for activation.

Activation and repression of transcription are primarily caused by gene regulatory proteins (activators and repressors), which act by binding to specific sites on DNA. The steps from initial binding of RNA polymerase to the elongating complex are characterized by many intermediates, each with a discrete structure, offering many mechanistic possibilities for regulator actions. It has been shown in some systems that the activator acts by helping RNA polymerase or other associated factors to bind (recruitment) and/or by influencing a postrecruitment step (isomerization, promoter clearance, etc.) (1-7). We have used the term recruitment for referring to assistance only on the initial binding step of RNA polymerase. We caution that a postbinding step may be indistinguishable from the recruitment step if they are in rapid equilibrium. Clearly, all activators do not act at the level of RNA polymerase recruitment to the promoters. There are activators demonstrated to help postbinding steps that have no effect on initial binding (4-7). Promoter-specific repression can occur by sterically hindering the binding of RNA polymerase or of, in principle, another essential transcription factor to the promoter (8, 9). However, other studies in several promoters, as was anticipated (10), point toward repressor action also through contact with promoter-bound RNA polymerase at a postbinding step (11-17). More interestingly, some regulators act as activator in one context and as repressor in another (13, 15). Although the contact regions on the surface of some regulators and of RNA polymerase have been mapped (18, 19), how these contacts cause activation or inhibition of transcription initiation in biochemical terms is not known. In principle, the contact may affect the process of transcription initiation (i) by allosteric modification of RNA polymerase and/or (ii) by energetic stabilization of an intermediate(s). Regulator-induced conformation changes in RNA polymerase by protein-protein contact may contribute to the regulation process. However, a regulator-RNA polymerase contact may play a fundamentally different role in transcription initiation. In this article, we provide a conceptual framework for the process of activator and repressor action through differential stabilization of one or more of the intermediate states of RNA polymerase-promoter complex by its contact with the regulator. We portray regulators as catalysts. From a thermodynamic point, we view that activators, like catalysts, lower the activation energy of some step(s) in the reaction pathway of transcription initiation. As discussed below, a similar energetic argument explains the action of repressors. To make our point, we discuss simple examples of DNA-binding regulators modulating RNA polymerase during transcription initiation in selected prokaryotic systems.

By binding to the DNA site OE at position -60.5 in the gal operon, the GalR protein activates transcription from the P2 promoter located on the opposite face of DNA (position -5) and represses transcription from the P1 promoter located on the same face (position +1). GalR increases RNA polymerase binding at P2 and inhibits isomerization at P1 by forming a GalR-DNA-RNA polymerase ternary complex in each case. The specific effect of GalR at one promoter is independent of the presence of the other promoter. The enhancement or repression is also not the intrinsic property of a promoter; the regulation can be reversed by switching the angular orientation of the promoters relative to OE. Both enhancement and repression appear to require the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and GalR and/or the same interaction between RNA polymerase alpha-subunit and DNA in the ternary complexes. We have discussed how GalR might exert opposite effects in the steps involved in the formation of the open complex from free RNA polymerase and DNA.

Transcription from two overlapping gal promoters is repressed by Gal repressor binding to bipartite gal operators, O(E) and O(I), which flank the promoters. Concurrent repression of the gal promoters also requires the bacterial histone-like protein HU which acts as a co-factor. Footprinting experiments using iron-EDTA-coupled HU show that HU binding to gal DNA is orientation specific and is specifically dependent upon binding of GalR to both O(E) and O(I). We propose that HU, in concert with GalR, forms a specific nucleoprotein higher order complex containing a DNA loop. This way, HU deforms the promoter to make the latter inactive for transcription initiation while remaining sensitive to inducer. The example of gal repression provides a model for studying how a 'condensed' DNA becomes available for transcription.

Gal repressor inhibits transcription from the gal promoter ( P 1) when it binds to the cognate operator ( O E ). The repression is relieved by the presence of the inducer d -galactose. Compared with its interaction with free repressor, d -galactose binds to the repressor–operator complex with 10-fold reduced affinity as determined by fluorescence enhancement measurements. Thermodynamic analysis and fluorescence anisotropy showed that the stability of the repressor–operator complex is reduced by only 7-fold by the presence of the inducer in the complex. The formation of the inducer–repressor–operator ternary complex has been confirmed by CD spectral analysis. Fluorescence spectroscopy and energy transfer experiments suggest that individual allosteric effects of the two ligands, inducer and operator, on Gal repressor are responsible for the slightly weakened stability of the ternary complex compared with the stability of the inducer–repressor and repressor–operator complexes. In vitro transcription results demonstrated full derepression of transcription of the P 1 promoter under conditions in which the concentrations of the inducer–repressor binary complex are severalfold higher than the dissociation constant of the inducer–repressor–operator ternary complex into inducer–repressor and free DNA. These results strongly suggest that the inducer binding to the repressor–operator complex does not lead to dissociation of the repressor from the operator during transcription induction. Because Gal repressor inhibits transcription by modulating the α subunit of the P 1-bound RNA polymerase, we conclude that the inducer binding to the operator-bound repressor only allosterically relieves the inhibitory effect of repressor on RNA polymerase without dissociating the repressor from DNA.

In experiments with germ free mice, free from adaptive antibodies to the bacterial virus lambda phage, titers of the virus in the circulatory system have been reported to decrease by more than 10(9)pfu within 48 h of intraperitoneal intravenous or oral administration. Based on these observations, serial passage techniques have been used to select lambda phage mutants, with 13,000-16,000-fold greater capacity to remain in the mouse circulatory system 24h after intraperitoneal injection. In these prior studies the "long-circulating" phage, designated lambdaArgo phage, had at least three mutations including one in the major phage capsid (E) protein, which resulted in the change of glutamic acid to a lysine at residue 158. In the current study, we demonstrate that this single specific substitution in the E protein is sufficient to confer the "long-circulating" phenotype. The isogenic pair of phage developed in this study consisting of the long-circulating marker-rescued lambdaArgo phage, and the parental wild type phage can be used for studies of viral recognition mechanisms of the innate immune system and for the development of more effective antibacterial therapeutic phage strains.

Background: Transcription initiation from the two overlapping promoters of the gal operon in Escherichia coli is negatively regulated by binding of Gal repressor (GalR) to bipartite operators, which encompass the promoters. Coordinated repression of the two promoters requires GalR binding to both operators. In a purified system, GalR, nevertheless, fails to show the coordinated repression, predicting the participation of an additional factor(s) in the regulation in vivo Results: We have purified a protein that restored the expected GalR-mediated repression for the in vitro system and have identified this factor to be the bacterial histone-like protein HU. In vitro transcription assays in the presence of GalR and HU show that, just as in vivo, the coordinated repression of the two gal promoters requires GalR binding to both operators and is sensitive to the inducer, d-galactose. The GalR and HU dependent repression also requires supercoiled DNA template and prevents open complex formation. Conclusion: We propose that HU, acting as a co-factor, brings about the GalR-mediated repression by forming a distinct nucleoprotein complex of higher order structure. Although how HU participates in the assembly process is unknown, there may be a cooperative effect in the formation of the repression complex.

We isolated and characterized mutant repressors (GalR) of the gal operon in Escherichia coli. These repressors (super-repressors), called GalRs, have a non-inducible phenotype. Repression of the gal operon by super-repressors cannot be lifted by inducer. The mutant galR genes, galRs, have been cloned and the mutational changes determined. Two of them, galRuv7s and galR78s, were located in the proposed sugar binding domains of the repressor. The repressor from wild-type (galR+), as well as from mutant galRuv7s, was purified and characterized biochemically. The results showed that, like wild-type GalR+, GalRuv7s binds to DNA normally and represses transcription from the P1 promoter and stimulates that from the P2 promoter of the gal operon. Nevertheless, compared to GalR+, GalRuv7s is much less sensitive to the presence of the inducer, D-galactose. The affinity of D-galactose to GalRuv7s is 10 to 30-fold lower, as measured by the effect of the inducer on GalR tryptophan fluorescence; GalR complexes with DNA and on GalR repression of transcription. Our results suggest that the super-repressor phenotype of GalRuv7s is because of a defect in D-galactose binding rather than a defect in the ligand-induced allosteric change or increased affinity for the operator.

The consensus DNA sequence for binding of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) has two symmetrically related inverted recognition elements TGTGA:TCACA, separated by a variable spacer, normally 6 bp long. We have shown that the CRP-cAMP complex, when bound to synthetic binding sites with an extended 8 bp spacer segment, induces an increase in the DNA circular dichroism (CD). The CD change at lambda275 nm agrees with the shift of approximately one helical turn of DNA into A-like form. The B-conformation is preserved for CRP binding sites similar to that in the lac and uxaCA promoters with 6 bp spacers. Another effect accompanying DNA binding is a dramatic increase of the negative CD magnitude in the spectral region of the ligand cAMP, at lambda272 nm. This effect is observed when CRP binds to specific sites with 6 or 8 bp spacers as well as to non-specific DNA. We reason that the A-like form arises by compressing and unwinding the DNA in CRP-DNA complexes having 8 bp central spacers. This serves to maintain a fixed length and twisting angle and is controlled by the protein's relatively rigid frame. This model is consistent with the observation that some binding sites with 6 bp spacers may also show the CD increase inherent to the sites with the extended 8 bp spacers. These 6 bp spacers are characterized by an increased twisting angle that requires their unwinding to bind to CRP. We propose that a mutual adaptation between CRP and binding sites by local untwisting and a B--A-like transition in the DNA is of general importance and may occur in other protein-DNA complexes, such as the complex of RNA polymerase with promoter DNA.

We previously showed that the transcription profile of the E. coli chromosome is dictated by its structure. We proposed that the chromosome has defined structures which change the transcriptability of the constituent promoters. We are exploring to understand the structure of the E. coli chromosome by a variety of approaches.HU, an abundant highly conserved chromosome-associated protein in E. coli, has been implicated to play an architectural role in the chromosome, and to constrain supercoils in DNA. We will discuss the contribution of HU in chromosomal structure and, as a result, in global gene expression. We will also describe RNA molecules that bind to HU, and a potential role of the RNA/HU complexes in chromosome compaction.In addition, we performed chromosome conformation analysis, and discovered that GalR, a regulon specific repressor, connects distal segments of the chromosome by GalR-GalR interactions. We believe this network formation organizes the chromosome in space, thereby contributing to chromosome compaction. This is the first evidence that a transcription factor participates in folding the chromosome into a 3-D structure.

A new gene ( galM ) has been identified as the fourth cistron of the gal operon, encoding enzymes for the metabolism of galactose and lactose in Escherichia coli . Induction of the gal operon either from the gal promoters or from a neighboring prophage λ promoter expresses the galM gene as well. The new structure of the gal operon from the promoter end is galE-galT-galK-galM in counter-clockwise orientation on the chromosome. Genetic and biochemical analyses have revealed that the galM gene product has mutarotase activity, which converts α-aldose to the β-anomer. Unlike mutarotase from other bacteria in which the enzyme is primarily processed for export and secretion, the mutarotase from E. coli does not appear to be processed and yet is still found in periplasm (and culture media when overexpressed) in significant amounts. Although the interconversion of the sugar anomers occurs spontaneously in pure water in vitro , the in vivo formation of α- d -galactopyranose (the substrate for phosphorylation) from β- d -galactopyranose (generated by β-galactosidase hydrolysis of lactose) is largely dependent upon the presence of the mutarotase. This shows that efficient lactose metabolism requires mutarotase. These results give credence to the idea that the activity of intracellular water is not high enough to permit a simple extrapolation of observed in vitro reactions to in vivo situations in every case.

In contrast to organized hierarchical structure of eukaryotic chromosome, bacterial chromosomes are believed not to have such structures. The genomes of bacteria are condensed into a compact structure called the nucleoid. Among many architectural, histone-like proteins which associate with the chromosomal DNA is HU which is implicated in folding DNA into a compact structure by bending and wrapping DNA. Unlike the majority of other histone-like proteins, HU is highly conserved in eubacteria and unique in its ability to bind RNA. Furthermore, an HU mutation profoundly alters the cellular transcription profile and consequently has global effects on physiology and the lifestyle of E. coli. Here we provide a short overview of the mechanisms by which the nucleoid is organized into different topological domains. We propose that HU is a major player in creating domain-specific superhelicities and thus influences the transcription profile from the constituent promoters. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin in time and space.

The HUαE38K, V42L mutant of the bacterial histone-like protein HU causes a major change in the transcription profile of the commensal organism Escherichia coli K-12 (Kar S, Edgar R, Adhya S, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:16397–16402, 2005). Among the upregulated genes are several related to pathogenic interactions with mammalian cells, as evidenced by the expression of curli fibers, Ivy, and hemolysin E. When E. coli K-12/ HUαE38K, V42L was added to Int-407 cells, there was host cell invasion, phagosomal disruption, and intracellular replication. The invasive trait was also retained in a murine ileal loop model and intestinal explant assays. In addition to invasion, the internalized bacteria caused a novel subversion of host cell apoptosis through modification and regulation of the BH3-only proteins BimEL and Puma. Changes in the transcription profile were attributed to positive supercoiling of DNA leading to the altered availability of relevant promoters. Using the E. coli K-12/HUαE38K, V42L variant as a model, we propose that traditional commensal E. coli can adopt an invasive lifestyle through reprogramming its cellular transcription, without gross genetic changes., IMPORTANCE Escherichia coli K-12 is well established as a benign laboratory strain and a human intestinal commensal. Recent evidences, however, indicate that the typical noninvasive nature of resident E. coli can be reversed under specific circumstances even in the absence of any major genomic flux. We previously engineered an E. coli strain with a mutant histone-like protein, HU, which exhibited significant changes in nucleoid organization and global transcription. Here we showed that the changes induced by the mutant HU have critical functional consequences: from a strict extracellular existence, the mutant E. coli adopts an almost obligate intracellular lifestyle. The internalized E. coli exhibits many of the prototypical characteristics of traditional intracellular bacteria, like phagosomal escape, intracellular replication, and subversion of host cell apoptosis. We suggest that E. coli K-12 can switch between widely divergent lifestyles in relation to mammalian host cells by reprogramming its cellular transcription program and without gross changes in its genomic content.

Galactose transport and metabolism in Escherichia coli involves a multicomponent amphibolic pathway. Galactose transport is accomplished by two different galactose-specific transport systems. At least four of the genes and operons involved in galactose transport and metabolism have promoters containing similar regulatory sequences. These sequences are recognized by at least three regulators, Gal repressor (GalR), Gal isorepressor (GalS) and cAMP receptor protein (CRP), which modulate transcription from these promoters. The negative regulators, GalR and GalS, discriminate between utilization of the high-affinity (regulated by GalS) and low-affinity (regulated by GalR) transport systems, and modulate the expression of genes for galactose metabolism in an overlapping fashion. GalS is itself autogenously regulated and CRP dependent, while the gene for GalR is constitutive. The gal operon encoding the enzymes for galactose metabolism has two promoters regulated by CRP in opposite ways; one (P1) is stimulated and the other (P2) inhibited by CRP. Both promoters are strongly repressed by GalR but weakly by GalS. All but one of the constituent promoters of the gal regulon have two operators. The gal regulon has the potential to coordinate galactose metabolism and transport in a highly efficient manner, under a wide variety of conditions of galactose availability.

We have developed an in vivo system to engender supercoiled "minicircle" DNA containing a single promoter by using the integrative recombination system of bacteriophage lambda. The resulting minicircle templates allow quantitative analysis of the stages of transcription initiation from a promoter, including synthesis of both full-length and aborted transcripts in the same reactions under physiological conditions. We have used such minicircle DNA templates to study in vitro transcription of the Escherichia coli gal promoter. The full-length transcripts from gal P1 and P2 promoters responded to cAMP-cAMP receptor protein in a manner identical to that observed in vivo. There is a 3.5-fold stimulation of P1 and almost total inhibition of P2 in the presence of cAMP. Thus, the unitary promoter system described here duplicates the in vivo physiology. In spite of the synthesis in equimolar amounts of full-length transcripts from P1 and P2 in the absence of cAMP in vitro, as in vivo, RNA polymerase encountered different rate-limiting steps of transcription initiation at the two promoters.

Two regulatory proteins, Gal repressor and isorepressor, control the expression of the gal and mgl operons in Escherichia coli. The transcription start sites for galR and galS, the genes for the repressor and isorepressor, were determined by primer extension of in vivo transcripts. Study of the promoter-lacZ gene fusions introduced into the chromosome indicated that galS expression was elevated in cells in which the normal galS gene was interrupted, but not in cells in which the galR gene was deleted. When both genes were disrupted, galS expression was further elevated. Expression from the galS promoter was stimulated by the addition of D-fucose, repressed by glucose, and dependent on cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). Expression of a similar gene fusion of the galR promoter to lacZ was unregulated. Both galR and galS genes contain two potential operator sites (OE and OI) and a CRP-binding site. The arrangement of OE, OI, and the CRP-binding site in the galS gene is analogous to the arrangement in the gal and mgl promoters, but the arrangement in galR is atypical. The increased concentration of the isorepressor when inducer is present may facilitate early shutoff of the isorepressor-regulated genes of the gal regulon when inducer (substrate) concentration falls.

The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli needs cAMP for an allosteric change to regulate gene expression by binding to specific DNA sites. The hinge region connecting the DNA-binding domain to the cAMP-binding domain has been proposed to participate in the cAMP-induced allosteric change necessary to adjust C and D alpha-helices for movement of the DNA-binding F alpha-helix away from the protein surface. The role of the hinge region for a conformation change in CRP was tested by studying the effects of single amino acid substitutions at residue 138 located within the hinge. Physiological studies of wild-type and mutant cells and biochemical analysis of purified wild-type and mutant CRP revealed at least three groups of altered CRPs: (i) CRP that behaves like wild type (CRP+); (ii) CRP that binds cAMP but does not complete the structural changes required for specific DNA binding, proteolytic cleavage, and transcription activation (CRPallo); and (iii) CRP that shows some or all of these conformational changes without cAMP (CRP*). These results show a pivotal role of position 138 from which change emanates and provide further evidence that a hinge reorientation involving residue 138 is involved in the interhelical adjustments.

HU is one of the histone-like DNA binding proteins, which are involved in maintaining the nucleoid structure in bacteria. HU has also been shown to ­participate in transcriptional regulation of specific promoters. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the mechanism of HU action in the transcriptional ­regulation of the two promoters of the gal operon in E. coli by providing results of genetic, biophysical and biochemical experiments both in vivo and in vitro.

The lambda (λ) bacteriophage epigenetic switch is a molecular mechanism that permits the quiescent (lysogenic) state of the bacteriophage to irreversibly switch to the virulent (lytic) state. After infection of its host, E. coli, λ, a temperate phage, most often grows lysogenically. The phage DNA integrates in the bacterial chromosome and is replicated along with it and transmitted to the bacterial progeny as a prophage. Lysogeny is very stable and yet, the switch to lysis is very efficient. Upon switching to lysis, the viral DNA is excised from the bacterial chromosome and the host machinery is used to produce viral progeny that is then released upon bursting of the host. The pathway to lysis is triggered in response to threats such as starvation, poisoning, or DNA damage.

Involvement of DNA looping between two spatially separated gal operators, OE and OI, in repression of the gal operon has been demonstrated in vivo. An in vitro transcription assay using a minicircle DNA containing the gal promoter region with lac operators was employed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of repression. Wild-type lac repressors (LacI+ protein molecules), which are capable of associating into a tetramer and forming a DNA loop, repressed transcription from promoter sites P1 and P2, whereas a non-looping lac repressor mutant (LacI(adi)) failed to show normal repression of both of the gal promoters. Thus a DNA loop is also required for repression of transcription in vitro. Repression mediated by DNA looping resulted in the inhibition of the synthesis of complete as well as aborted transcripts, demonstrating that the repressive action was on the formation or activity of the initial transcribing complex. Under similar conditions, the gal repressor (GalR protein) did not repress the gal promoters effectively, apparently because it failed to loop DNA containing gal operators in the purified system. The component(s) or conditions that aid GalR in DNA looping remain to be identified.

Several potential target sites for multiple regulatory mechanisms were previously identified in the 5' flanking region of the pts operon. We have investigated the in vitro interactions of the cAMP receptor protein (CRP).cAMP regulatory complex with two DNA binding sites, by gel mobility-shift assays, and report the analysis of the functional role of each of the binding sites in vivo. Promoter-reporter gene fusion studies identified two CRP.cAMP-dependent promoters (the previously identified P1 and another promoter, P0) upstream of ptsH. The crr promoters (P2) within ptsI may be negatively regulated by CRP.cAMP.

We describe a family of proteins which regulate transcription of inducible genes in bacteria (GalR-LacI family). An alignment of the proteins in the GalR-LacI family is presented in which these proteins show a very high degree of similarity (60%) throughout the entire sequences. The homology is greatest among the amino-terminal DNA binding domains. Since a portion of the operator sequences occupied by these proteins is also conserved, a similar DNA structure may be required for specific recognition of DNA by members of the GalR-LacI family. Highly conserved motifs involved in effector binding and oligomerization are also identified. This compilation suggests a widespread conservation of these regulators among bacteria, and have strong implications for further study of peptide motifs in domain function, as well as pathways of protein evolution.

Small molecules generally activate or inhibit gene transcription as externally added substrates or as internally accumulated end-products, respectively. Rarely has a connection been made that links an intracellular intermediary metabolite as a signal of gene expression. We report that a perturbation in the critical step of a metabolic pathway—the D-galactose amphibolic pathway—changes the dynamics of the pathways leading to accumulation of the intermediary metabolite UDP-galactose. This accumulation causes cell stress and transduces signals that alter gene expression so as to cope with the stress by restoring balance in the metabolite pool. This underscores the importance of studying the global effects of alterations in the level of intermediary metabolites in causing stress and coping with it by transducing signals to genes to reach a stable state of equilibrium (homeostasis). Such studies are an essential component in the integration of metabolomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics.

Transcription of many genes is regulated by combinations of multiple signals. In Escherichia coli, combinatorial control is typical in the case of operons related to utilization of different sugars in the absence of glucose. To understand regulation of the transport and metabolic pathways in the galactose system, we measured activities of the six gal regulon promoters simultaneously, using an in vitro transcription system containing purified components. Input functions were computed on the basis of the experimental measurements. We observed four different shapes of input functions. From the results, we can conclude that the structure of the regulatory network is insufficient for the determination of signal integration. It is the actual structure of the promoter and regulatory region, the mechanism of transcription regulation, and the interplay between transcription factors that shape the input function to be suitable for adaptation.

Many transcription factors repress transcription of their own genes. Negative autoregulation has been shown to reduce cell-cell variation in regulatory protein levels and speed up the response time in gene networks. In this work we examined transcription regulation of the galS gene and the function of its product, the GalS protein. We observed a unique operator preference of the GalS protein characterized by dominant negative autoregulation. We show that this pattern of regulation limits the repression level of the target genes in steady states. We suggest that transcription factors with dominant negative autoregulation are designed for regulating gene expression during environmental transitions.

Bending is not only required to accommodate DNA within the cell but also is a mechanism used by proteins to initiate DNA replication, transcription, and recombination. Determining the angles by which regulatory DNA segments deviate from linearity upon binding of proteins is a necessary step toward a better understanding of a large number of essential biological functions. The pBend plasmids contain duplicate sets of restriction sites and, when combined with "gel shift" experiments, allow the straightforward determination of the bending angle in a DNA molecule. The steps for successfully carrying out a binding/bending experiment are described. They include the cloning of the protein-binding site into the chosen pBend vector, the isolation of a series of DNA fragments with identical in length but variable placing of the protein-binding site, and the gel electrophoretic analysis of the free and protein-bound fragments.

In wild-type Escherichia coli, expression of the gal operon is negatively regulated by the Gal repressor and is induced 10- to 15-fold when the repressor is inactivated by an inducer. In strains completely deleted for galR, the gene which encodes the Gal repressor, the operon is derepressed by only 10-fold without an inducer. But this derepression is increased further by threefold during cell growth in the presence of an inducer, D-galactose or D-fucose. This phenomenon of extreme induction in the absence of Gal repressor is termed ultrainduction--a manifestation of further inducibility in a constitutive setup. Construction and characterization of gene and operon fusion strains between galE and lacZ, encoding beta-galactosidase as a reporter gene, show that ultrainduction occurs at the level of transcription and not translation. Transcription of the operon, from both the cyclic AMP-dependent P1 and the cyclic nucleotide-independent P2 promoters, is subject to ultrainduction. The wild-type galR+ gene has an epistatic effect on ultrainducibility: ultrainduction is observed only in cells devoid of Gal repressor protein. Titration experiments show the existence of an ultrainducibility factor that acts like a repressor and functions by binding to DNA segments (operators) to which Gal repressor also binds to repress the operon.

The virulent bacteriophage EPS7 active against a number of Salmonella serovar and Escherichia coli strains, isolated from the local sewage in Korea, belongs to the family Siphoviridae. The ESP7 genome constitutes a linear double-stranded DNA of 111 382 bp. DNA sequencing and genomic analysis of EPS7 showed that it belongs to the phage T5 family. We identified the EPS7 genes involved in DNA repair, replication, viral structure and bacterial lysis by comparing the EPS7 genome with that of T5. In contrast, the tail genes encoding for putative host receptor-binding protein and the putative receptor-blocking lipoprotein precursor of EPS7 exhibit high homologies with the corresponding gene products of BF23, another member of the T5-family. BF23 binds to BtuB, a surface receptor in the host and involved in vitamin B(12) uptake, but its infection is independent of TonB. By constructing a series of deletion mutants in Salmonella and in E. coli and studying phage infection in the mutant hosts, we showed that BtuB is also the host receptor of the phage EPS7. Whether EPS7 infection depends on TonB needs to be further studied.

The two optical forms of aldohexose galactose differing at the C-1 position, α- d -galactose and β- d -galactose, are widespread in nature. The two anomers also occur in di- and polysaccharides, as well as in glycoconjugates. The anomeric form of d -galactose, when present in complex carbohydrates, e.g., cell wall, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, is specific. Their interconversion occurs as monomers and is effected by the enzyme mutarotase (aldose-1-epimerase). Mutarotase and other d -galactose-metabolizing enzymes are coded by genes that constitute an operon in Escherichia coli . The operon is repressed by the repressor GalR and induced by d -galactose. Since, depending on the carbon source during growth, the cell can make only one of the two anomers of d -galactose, the cell must also convert one anomer to the other for use in specific biosynthetic pathways. Thus, it is imperative that induction of the gal operon, specifically the mutarotase, be achievable by either anomer of d -galactose. Here we report in vivo and in vitro experiments showing that both α- d -galactose and β- d -galactose are capable of inducing transcription of the gal operon with equal efficiency and kinetics. Whereas all substitutions at the C-1 position in the α configuration inactivate the induction capacity of the sugar, the effect of substitutions in the β configuration varies depending upon the nature of the substitution; methyl and phenyl derivatives induce weakly, but the glucosyl derivative does not.