Search

O presente artigo analisa a evolução da competência dos tribunais quanto à fixação de teses e temas ao longo das sucessivas reformas constitucionais e do revogado CPC/73, além de mudanças na orientação jurisprudencial do STF, culminando com a vigência do CPC/2015. O alargamento do rol de decisões que vinculam os Tribunais e juízos inferiores com a previsão de precedentes vinculantes exclusivamente em normas infraconstitucionais é cotejado com as disposições da CF/88, sobretudo com o princípio da separação dos poderes e com aquelas relacionadas à independência da magistratura.

This article seeks to analyze the interests involved in the direct administrative alteration of the first name and gender of the transgender. It starts with the analysis of fundamental rights and the personality of people who do not identify with their biological gender. Rights such as sexual identity, freedom of gender self-determination and recognition of self-perceived identity are highlighted. To realize these rights is to ensure that the transgender can socially identify with a proper name to this reality. Therefore, it is necessary to study the name as an element of the civil registry, considering the interests it seeks to ensure, both the right of identity of the natural person, and the security in legal relations, which must be protected, to the greatest extent possible. It is also essential to analyze the technical rules related to civil registration, in the context of the mentioned amendment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumo Os Tribunais de Contas brasileiros ganharam bastante notoriedade nos últimos anos. Embora a aplicação do Direito por qualquer órgão esteja aberta às diversas possibilidades interpretativas da lei, a análise das súmulas desses tribunais evidencia grande assimetria na interpretação normativa por parte de tais órgãos, o que pode gerar um tratamento diferenciado em casos semelhantes. Nesse contexto, este artigo buscou identificar assimetrias no conteúdo das súmulas dos Tribunais de Contas brasileiros para verificar se há isonomia na fiscalização dos gestores e organizações do setor público no território nacional. A pesquisa foi realizada a partir de uma metodologia qualitativa, com a utilização do método de análise de conteúdo e o apoio do software Iramuteq. Como resultado, apresenta-se um mapeamento das súmulas dos Tribunais de Contas brasileiros a partir de sete classes (remuneração, aposentadoria, pensão, irregularidades, processo de contas, orçamento e licitação). Tais dados podem ser úteis ao planejamento estratégico na Administração Pública, buscando garantir mais segurança jurídica aos gestores públicos. As conclusões indicaram não existir isonomia na auditoria dos gestores e organizações do setor público no território nacional, especialmente em razão da inexistência de uma Corte Superior de Contas com o papel de harmonizar essa jurisprudência na federação.

Através do meio indutivo, esse artigo buscou expor o funcionamento do microssistema de precedentes no Brasil tendo por enfoque a sua aplicação os tribunais de sobreposição. Foram feitas singelas comparações entre o Código de Processo Civil de 2015 e o Código de Processo Civil de 1973, de forma a demonstrar as principais alterações inauguradas pelo novel Código. No primeiro tópico foi apresentada uma ideia geral do que se entende por microssistema de precedentes, sendo relatado os motivos que deram gênese a tais instrumentos. Bem como a importância que o Processo Civil lhes concedeu ao promulgar o Código de Processo Civil de 2015. Nos subtópicos relativos ao Microssistema de Precedentes foram tratadas as principais espécies de precedentes obrigatórios. Tendo por enfoque a sua aplicação feita pelos tribunais de sobreposição. No terceiro tópico dessa obra foi conceituado o que se deve entender por segurança jurídica, e as razões pela qual deve ser considerada um princípio fundamental, que balize as decisões dos tribunais e juízes monocráticos. No tópico concernente à solipsismo judicial foram expostos seus principais celeumas e falhas. Também foi revelado que o ativismo judicial baseado em uma aplicação incorreta da teoria dos princípios, é contestado por seu maior representante, qual seja Humberto Ávila. Por fim, este estudo arguiu a efetividade do microssistema de precedentes no combate ao solipsismo judicial e a consequente efetivação do princípio da segurança jurídica.

Franchise is a business concluded for collaboration between entrepreneurs. In the case of a business-to-business contract, it is essential to guarantee the autonomy and contractual freedom of the parties, respecting, for example, the clause that elects arbitration to resolve conflicts. The franchise systems, to function as such, require a certain standardization, including the contract that instrumentalizes the business. However, the standardization of business cannot imply in the classification of the franchise contract as a pure standard form contract. Nevertheless, this was the main argument used by the brazilian Superior Court of Justice to void a pathological arbitration clause inserted in a franchise agreement, submitting the controversy to the Judiciary. The main objectives of this article are to demonstrate that the franchise contract is not a pure standard form contract, as well as that such judicial guidance generates insecurity for the business relations and destabilizes the market. The case is taken as the starting point for the analysis, through the use of the inductive method.

The presente study aimed to analyze, under the bias of the economic analysis of law, the importance of legal security as a proposal for the construction of a jurisdictional rationality. The justification for this study is supported by the need to promote ways to build legal security, in view of the damaging effects on the country's economic development. Thus, in the foreground, the economic analysis of the law and its own methodology were analyzes. In the second moment, having made the existing correlation between legal secutiry and the allocation for economic development, the possibilities are demonstrated in a non-exhaustive way, including the use of technological tools, in order to promote and privilegie the construction of a culture, based on legal certaint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In matters of extracontractual liability of the State, the processes of direct reparation that have been derived from facts on the occasion of the CAI have generated changes in the categories of protection that have been transforming especially since the existence of the CAI is recognized. Objective: The main objective of this research is to determine which are the conditions that have been assessed by the Council of State to establish the adequacy of the title of imputation and the conditions of interpretation of the categories of antijuridical damage and the responsibility of the State. Materials and Methods: The study was delimited from the documentary review of a random selection of sentences of the Council of State taken in a non-probabilistic way through the categories of the titles of imputation that were presented in a chronological reconstruction where the reference axis was contrasted in an analytical dimension of the recognition of the CAI. Results: the study evidenced how among the different titles of imputation applicable to facts of the internal armed conflict there are parameters that evidence a transition from institutional omission that allowed a margin of the conception of the antijuridical damage wide towards a more limited margin based on a more rigorous development of the principle of legality. Conclusions: The declaration of the internal armed conflict had a great impact on the way tort liability was developed, which by providing new categories of protection generated more legal certainty but limited broad interpretations of tort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Direito GV is the property of Fundacao Getulio Vargas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article analyzes the consequential argument as a justification for the judicial decisions on tax matters. At first, we investigated what the consequentist arguments are, focusing on Neil MacCormick's theory. Then, consequentialism was analyzed as a criterion in judicial decisions, verifying whether such arguments can be classified as legal, since they have a value load because the judge decides based on subjective elements. After this analysis, it was verified the limits of consequentialism in tax law, to the extent a decision based on consequential arguments must prevail for cohesion and coherence, without leaving aside the observance of reasonableness. The analysis of cases tried by the Supreme Court was also carried out in order to identify how the consequences of the decision were worked on. Finally, based on the results achieved, it was perceived that it is possible to judge based on the practical consequences of the decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Uerj is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Relações Internacionais is the property of Institute of International Relations of Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O presente artigo procura enfrentar importantes questões dogma e pragmáticas ao regramento do denominado Incidente de Assunção de Competência, este com previsão no Código de Processo Civil de 2015, procurando reconhecer em sua análise, desde os requisitos para sua admissibilidade e as controvérsias entre os mesmos até as características procedimentais particulares, de modo a possibilitar, efetivamente, reflexões quanto aos desideratos justificadores de sua regulação, quais sejam: a previsibilidade das decisões judiciais e o estabelecimento da segurança jurídica por meio dos julgamentos realizado pelos Tribunais Brasileiros.

Copyright of Direito da Cidade is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista del ICDT is the property of Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Tributario and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista del ICDT is the property of Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Tributario and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista del ICDT is the property of Instituto Colombiano de Derecho Tributario and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article analyzes six arguments in favor of using judicial precedents as a way to achieve effective access to justice: legal certainty, equality, coherence, definition of expectations, procedural speed and argumentative economy. Firstly, the importance of precedents for a better judicial performance is verified. Then the arguments above are developed and related. To support this study, modern foreign and national doctrine was used. It is concluded that the appropriate use of judicial precedents is capable of strengthening and improving Brazilian legal practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of A&C - Administrative & Constitutional Law Review - Revista de Direito Administrativo e Constitucional is the property of A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional (Instituto Bacellar) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In the judgment of ADCs n.º 43/DF, 44/DF e 54/DF, terminated on 11.07.2019, the Federal Court of Justice (STF) agreed that the early execution of an appellant judgment offends the principle of presumption of innocence, embodied in art. 5, item LVII, of the Major Statute, declaring, consequently, the constitutionality of art. 283, CPP, which conditions the commencement of the execution of the sentence to the res judicata of the conviction, thus reformulating its jurisprudence triggered in HC judgment 126.292/SP, held on February 17, 2016, pacifying, in the legal context, the discussion of the possibility of arrest in the second instance and restoring stability and legal stability in the country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas is the property of Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

RESUMO: O presente artigo busca apresentar a doutrina dos precedentes vinculantes e obrigatórios como novo paradigma a ser pensado nos Estados Constitucionais democráticos que têm em seu Poder Judiciário novo locus de criação e ressignificação dos direitos humanos e fundamentais quando do julgamento dos casos constitucionais difíceis. Apresenta a doutrina dos precedentes vinculantes, presente nos países do common law, que nunca tiveram a ilusão de que os limites do intérprete estariam contidos no próprio texto normativo, mas para verificar de que modo a mesma foi pensada a dar coerência e segurança jurídica ao sistema. Pretendeu-se, sob o método de pesquisa bibliográfica comparada enfrentar temas relativos à força vinculante dos precedentes, quer seja do ponto de vista horizontal ou vertical, a distinção entre precedentes persuasivos e vinculantes, bem como a possibilidade de erro no julgamento a justificar sua superação ou manutenção. Por outro lado, também apresentou a distinção entre seguir um precedente pelo fato dele ser um precedente ou pela experiência conhecida a partir do mesmo, bem como expôs as possíveis justificativas para o uso dos precedentes, como coerência, uniformidade do direito, segurança jurídica, eficiência e celeridade do Poder Judiciário. ABSTRACT: This article aims to analyze the doctrine of binding precedent as a new paradigm to be thought in the constitutional and democratic States, that have their judicial branch a new locus of creation and reinterpretation of human and fundamental rights when judging the difficult constitutional cases. The article also presents the doctrine of binding precedent, as in common law countries, who have never had the illusion that the interpretation of Law has limits in the normative text itself, but to know how the system was thought to provide consistency and legal certainty. This article uses comparative constitutional literature to tackle issues relating to the binding force of precedents, either horizontal or vertical, the distinction between persuasive and binding precedents, and the possibility of error in judgment to justify its overruling or maintenance. On the other hand, it examines the distinction between following a precedent because it is a precedent or because of a known experience and exposed the justifications for the use of the binding precedents, such as consistency, uniformity of law, legal certainty and efficiency.

A questão da decadência dos atos administrativos no caso de inconstitucionalidade é analisada a partir da análise do Recurso Extraordinário nº 817.338 – que aguarda julgamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Nele se discute a possibilidade de anulação de ato administrativo pela Administração Pública, caso evidenciada violação direta a texto constitucional, mesmo se decorrido o prazo decadencial previsto no artigo 54 da Lei nº 9.784/99. Aqui, não cabe verificar a (in)constitucionalidade da Portaria nº 2.340/03, expedida pelo Ministro da Justiça em 09 de dezembro de 2003, sua suposta carência de pressuposto de validade (motivo) e a afronta direta ou indireta ao artigo 8º do Ato das Disposição Constitucionais Transitórias (ADCT). Pretende-se sim discutir se esse ato, caso reconhecido como inconstitucional, poderia ter seus efeitos estabilizados pelo tempo, em observância ao disposto no inciso XXXVI, do artigo 5º da Constituição Federal, a partir do debate sobre a extensão do dever-poder de a Administração Pública anular seus próprios atos, bem como os efeitos da decadência sobre atos tidos como nulos, anuláveis ou inconstitucionais. Cumpre apontar que, ante as particularidades do caso e a ausência de outros precedentes específicos, o Recurso Extraordinário nº 817.338 poderá ser primeiro caso em que o Supremo Tribunal Federal enfrentará, efetivamente, o conflito entre a tutela da confiança versus o império da ordem constitucional. O método de abordagem será o dedutivo, pelo método de procedimento comparativo e pela técnica de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, com análise da legislação envolvida, da doutrina sobre o tema e dos precedentes do STF que se mostram importantes ao desenvolvimento do trabalho.

El presente artículo tiene por objeto entregar algunos criterios para la elaboración de una crítica a la extensión de fundamentalidad al instituto de la cosa juzgada. Para ello, lo cual se ha optado por revisar la visión que defiende la naturaleza constitucional del instituto, que corresponde a aquella que entiende que la cosa juzgada es garantía de la seguridad jurídica, y por esto integraría la categoría de los derechos fundamentales. En un segundo momento, se analiza la relación entre cosa juzgada y jurisdicción, para entonces establecer si el instituto de la cosa juzgada es revestido de fundamentabilidad. De este modo, el presente trabajo busca presentar la crítica actual de que la inflación de derechos fundamentales termina por debilitar su fuerza de exigencia

O presente artigo tem por objetivo analisar se os incentivos fiscais, em tributos sujeitos a lançamento por homologação, na estrutura jurídica em que se encontram e nos moldes em que são materializados, cumprem o papel de promover comportamentos desejados. Valendo-se do método hipotético-dedutivo, demonstrar-se-á que o lançamento por homologação, na medida em que outorga ao contribuinte a função de interpretar e aplicar o direito, cria uma situação de insegurança jurídica, desestimulando os contribuintes a realizarem os comportamentos que os referidos incentivos pretendem promover.

Trata-se das práticas contemporâneas do Estado brasileiro, especificamente sobre o conflito entre a liberdade e a segurança jurídica, e de qual modo esta tensão fez-se presente nas orientações político-jurídicas de formação e desenvolvimento do Estado de Polícia, posteriormente, do Estado de Direito, e a repercussão atual junto ao Direito Administrativo, notadamente ao serem atribuídos os papeis entre o Estado e a livre-iniciativa.

The fundamental principles of legal certainty and equality. Conceptand legal nature of res judicata. Elements of the constitutional construction of res judicata. The limits and mechanisms for review of res jucata. The provisional guardian shipand res judicata. The resolution incident repetitive demand sand res judicata. Changes of institute of res judicata with advent of the New Civil Procedure Code at the light of the constututional principles of equality na security. New tools provided by the new law. The constitucional foundations of procedural nature of security em contemporary litigation.

This paper seeks to evaluate the art. 525, §§ 12 and 15 of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, which introduced new hypothesis of the suitability of rescission action founded on unconstitutionality declarated by the Supreme Court that has addressed the legislative foundation that formed the basis for the decision who seeks to terminate, opening new deadline for the filing of this exceptional measure from the statement of the Supreme Court. The analysis takes place in collating this standard with the principles of legal certainty, through the discussion of theory of judicial review to, at the end, assess its constitutionality.

This essay pretends to demonstrate how the issue of the interpretation of legal norms was treated in the New Rhetoric of Chaïm Perelman. The theory emerged in the 1950´s criticizing juridical positivism and bringing back the possibility of reinsertion of valuational matters in the application of the law. With the scope of not compromising legal predictability, notions like equity and reasonability where hitched to the concept. Furthermore, the essay aimed, with the collation of literary works about the theme, to analyze the possibility of applying the New Rhetoric theory in the Brazilian Legal Order, The method utilized was the critic- deductive.

Copyright of Direito da Cidade is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The present article involves the study about the observance of the constitutional principle of tax precedence when the previously granted tax benefit is revoked. The doctrine defends the application of the principle, considering that the revocation of a tax benefit represents a standard of incidence, that is, it is considered creation / increase of tax, and obedience to art. 150, III, "b", of the Federal Constitution. However, the Federal Supreme Court has not yet pacified the issue, having precedent to the contrary, although in a more recent judgment also understood the application of said principle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present article investigates public warrants provides by states enterprises and public guarantor funds at public-private partnerships contracts. The study analyses the nature and legal regime of states enterprises and public guarantor founds founded to provides warrants at public contracts. The article also measures the ability of its warrants to provide legal certainty to public contracts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present work intends to expose the various ways in which the Institute of legal certainty was treated and applied, pragmatically, in some legal systems, in order to allow a comparative analysis on the subject. Essential aspects of legal certainty were analyzed in Germany, France, the European Union, Argentina and Brazil. Finally, through the comparative method, established some common premises, that is, pertinent and useful dogmatic elements and solution models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]