Search

Objectives: In this study, we conducted a longitudinal evaluation of changes in medication adherence and the role of psychosocial and interpersonal factors in these changes among Blacks with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and determined barriers and facilitators of T2DM medication adherence. Methods: We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design for a sample of 287 black adult patients with T2DM in Wisconsin. Two surveys quantitatively evaluated changes in medication adherence, psychosocial factors, and interpersonal factors over time. We conducted 10 semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore participants' perceptions of these changes. Data integration of the quantitative and qualitative findings elucidated barriers and facilitators of medication adherence. Results: Increased adherence was significantly correlated with less concerns about medicines (r = -0.31), higher self-efficacy (r = 0.47), lesser depressive symptoms (r = -0.26), and lesser negative illness perceptions (r = -0.26) at both baseline and follow-up. Patient perceptions of adherence changes included adherence motivators, social support, and complex medication regimens. Integration showed that barriers and facilitators both existed in individuals who had an increase or a decrease in adherence over time. Conclusions: Specific beliefs of Blacks towards T2DM medications must be addressed to improve their adherence. Interventions must be tailored using interpersonal factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The exact pathway linking health literacy, self-efficacy, medication adherence, and glycemic control for type 2 diabetes remains unclear. Understanding the relationship between patient factors, medication adherence, and lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) may help patients better manage their disease. This study examined the association of health literacy and medication self-efficacy with self-reported diabetes medication adherence, and the association of health literacy, medication self-efficacy, and self-reported diabetes medication adherence with HbA1c of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized a face-to-face questionnaire at two family medicine clinics in a Midwestern state among 174 patients; subjects enrolled were at least 20 years old with diagnosed type 2 diabetes, prescribed at least one oral diabetes medicine, and understood English. Questionnaires were administered to assess the participants’: health literacy, using the Newest Vital Sign six-item questionnaire (NVS); self-efficacy for medication use, using the 13-item Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale; and self-report medication adherence, using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. HbA1c values were obtained from participants’ electronic medical records. Multiple linear regressions were used to explore the association of health literacy and medication self-efficacy with both medication adherence and HbA1c level after controlling for all other covariates. Results: Self-reported health status (β = 0.17, p = 0.015) and medication self-efficacy (β = 0.53, p , 0.001) were positively associated with diabetes medication adherence. Health literacy was neither associated with diabetes medication adherence (β = −0.04, p = 0.586) nor HbA1c (β = −0.06, p = 0.542). Lower diabetes medication adherence (β = −0.26, p = 0.008) and higher number of prescribed medications (β = 0.28, p = 0.009) were correlated with higher HbA1c. Conclusion: Health literacy, as measured by the NVS, does not correlate with medication adherence or glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Interventions to improve patients’ self-efficacy of medication use may improve diabetes medication adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetes is disproportionally burdensome among African-Americans (AAs) and medication adherence is important for optimal outcomes. Limited studies have qualitatively examined reasons for nonadherence among AAs with type 2 diabetes, though AAs are less adherent to prescribed medications compared to whites. This study explored the reasons for medication nonadherence and adherence among AAs with type 2 diabetes and examined AAs' perceived solutions for enhancing adherence. Methods: Forty AAs, age 45--60 years with type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year prior, taking at least one prescribed diabetes medication, participated in six semistructured 90-minute focus groups. Using a phenomenology qualitative approach, reasons for nonadherence and adherence, as well as participants' perceived solutions for increasing adherence were explored. Qualitative content analysis was conducted. Results: AAs' reasons for intentional nonadherence were associated with 1) their perception of medicines including concerns about medication side effects, as well as fear and frustration associated with taking medicines; 2) their perception of illness (disbelief of diabetes diagnosis); and 3) access to medicines and information resources. Participants reported taking their medicines because they valued being alive to perform their social and family roles, and their belief in the doctor's recommendation and medication helpfulness. Participants provided solutions for enhancing adherence by focusing on the roles of health care providers, patients, and the church. AAs wanted provider counseling on the necessity of taking medicines and the consequences of not taking them, indicating the need for the AA community to support and teach self-advocacy in diabetes self-management, and the church to act as an advocate in ensuring medication use. Conclusion: Intentional reasons of AAs with type 2 diabetes for not taking their medicines were related to their perception of medicines and illness. Solutions for enhancing diabetes medication adherence among AAs should focus on the roles of providers, patients, and the church. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The prevalence of medication non-adherence is 50% in chronic disease conditions and varies from 30% to 70% in asthma maintenance medications. A major drawback in addressing medication non-adherence is the short time available for patient consultations, which limits the ability of the clinician in identifying the problem. Thus, this study explores how medication adherence behavior can be clustered and identifies the unique characteristics of each cluster so that clinicians can recognize the cluster characteristics in patients to provide targeted interventions. The study objectives were to: (1) cluster patients' medication adherence behavior with asthma maintenance medications based on their beliefs in medicines and illness perceptions, and (2) describe the characteristics of the patients in each cluster based on psychosocial, clinical, and demographic characteristics.Research Design and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey design on a convenience sample of adult individuals who were taking asthma maintenance medications.Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported medication adherence using Morisky scale, beliefs in medicines using Beliefs in Medicines Questionnaire, and illness perceptions using the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire.Results: The cluster analysis with 392 subjects resulted in five clusters based on patients' beliefs in medicines and their illness perceptions. The clusters formed had distinct characteristics that lend themselves to monitoring or for which targeted interventions can be framed to improve medication adherence.Limitations: The study only examined asthma maintenance medications limiting the generalizability of the study. Also, all the data collected including medication adherence were self-reported data from an online panel. This can cause selection bias and lack of generalizability.Conclusions: The study demonstrated how the concept of 'non-adherence' is different for different patients and the need for tailored interventions for each type of non-adherence. With the limited consultation time available for clinicians to communicate with the patients, identifying the characteristics of patients in different clusters can assist clinicians in providing appropriate targeted interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe patients' perceived value and use of quality measures in evaluating and choosing community pharmacies. Design: Focus group methodology was combined with a survey tool. During the focus groups, participants assessed the value of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance's quality measures in evaluating and choosing a pharmacy. Also, participants completed questionnaires rating their perceived value of quality measures in evaluating a pharmacy (1 being low value and 5 being high) or choosing a pharmacy (yes/no). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the focus groups and surveys, respectively. Setting: Semistructured focus groups were conducted in a private meeting space of an urban and a rural area of a Mid-western State in the USA. Participants: Thirty-four adults who filled prescription medications in community pharmacies for a chronic illness were recruited in community pharmacies, senior centres and public libraries. Results: While comments indicated that all measures were important, medication safety measures (eg, drug- drug interactions) were valued more highly than others. Rating of quality measure utility in evaluating a pharmacy ranged from a mean of 4.88 ('drug-drug interactions') to a mean of 4.0 ('absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma'). Patients were hesitant to use quality information in choosing a pharmacy (depending on the participant's location) but might consider if moving to a new area or having had a negative pharmacy experience. Use of select quality measures to choose a pharmacy ranged from 97.1% of participants using 'drug-drug interactions' (medication safety measure) to 55.9% using 'absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma'. Conclusions: The study participants valued quality measures in evaluating and selecting a community pharmacy, with medication safety measures valued highest. The participants reported that the quality measures would not typically cause a switch in pharmacy but might influence their selection in certain situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient education programs encouraging diabetes self-management can improve clinical outcomes and lessen diabetes complications. This study implemented an innovative interprofessional student-led diabetes self-management and health promotion program for an underserved population and demonstrated an improvement in participant clinical outcomes and students' understanding of interprofessional aspects of diabetes care. Methods and Findings: This community-based program was implemented at two sites that serve medically underserved individuals. Students from five health career professions led educational sessions designed to demonstrate critical components of diabetes self-management. The six-month longitudinal program covered topics within the Alphabet Strategy, including Advice, Blood pressure, Cholesterol, Diabetes control, Dental care, Diet, Eye care, Foot care, and Guardian drugs. Participants completed surveys evaluating diabetes knowledge, understanding of diabetes care, and health behaviours. Clinical values were collected before and after the program. Student surveys assessed their understanding of diabetes self-management. Upon completion of the program, all assessments were repeated to determine if there were improvements in outcomes. Thirty-eight participants and thirty students completed the study. There were significant improvements in participants' diabetes knowledge, understanding of diabetes management, and clinical outcomes. There were significant improvements in the students' ability to educate patients about foot care, eye care, and guardian drugs, as well as increased awareness of the role of each health profession in diabetes care. Conclusions: This interprofessional health promotion model showed significant improvements in patient and student outcomes. This innovative student-led program could be implemented in other settings and for the management of other chronic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objectives of this study are to describe the illness perceptions and medication beliefs of minority women with diabetes and to examine if these beliefs have an impact on medication non-adherence. Methods: Minority women who had been diagnosed with diabetes within the past six months, taking prescribed medications and able to speak English were recruited in Sioux Falls. Patients were interviewed about their views on diabetes, beliefs in medicines and medication non-adherence. Descriptive statistics examined patient characteristics. Mann-Whitney U tests compared patients' beliefs to their medication non-adherence. Spearman's rho correlation examined associations between illness perceptions, medication non-adherence and beliefs in medicines. Results: The subjects were predominantly Native American (81.3 percent), had had diabetes for a long time (mean= 9.06 years), and had an average age of 46 years. More than half (56.3 percent) reported being non- adherent. No correlations were found between medication beliefs and non-adherence. Patients' beliefs that their actions can control the disease were associated with medication non-adherence. Conclusions: There was not enough sample size and statistical power to be able to make a valid conclusion about the associations of beliefs and adherence. However, women are often the major caregivers in a family. Due to their socio-cultural positions, family roles may seem more important than medication adherence, and their illness and/or beliefs in medicines may not impact their behavior. Cultural beliefs may not be perceptible during clinical consultations; therefore, a continued effort to understand socio-cultural factors that may impact patients with diabetes, especially minority women, should be done. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author discusses the need for physicians to examine patients' beliefs and attitudes about medicines as a step towards establishing effective physician-patient communication. She asserts that establishing relationships with patients can help improve patient outcomes, such as patient adherence, patient satisfaction and symptom reporting, as well as build trust. She cites some studies that show the benefit of addressing miscommunication between clinicians and patients in terms of diagnosis and treatment.

Background: People with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PWH) experience barriers to care within the community that impedes their progress from when they discover that they are HIV positive to becoming virally suppressed. For individuals with HIV to achieve sustained viral suppression, they must be linked to care to start receiving anti-retroviral therapy and remain retained in care for continuous treatment. However, HIV surveillance data shows that many PWH are not linked to care and become lost to continuous follow-up care. Although pharmacists, PWH, and social workers interact with one another and are aware of their roles in HIV care, their perspectives on barriers to linkage and retention in care have not been investigated collectively., Objectives: Explore the perspectives of PWH, pharmacists, and social workers on barriers to linkage and retention of HIV care within the community setting., Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 15 stakeholders (five PWH, five community pharmacists, and five social workers) who participated in 1-h, semi-structured interviews based on three domains of the Patient-centered Medical Home Model including (1) experiences (individual and system-level barriers to care experienced by PWH), (2) activities (social workers and pharmacists initiatives that impact adherence to care)and (3) interventions (critical issues pharmacists can address in the community to engage PWH in their HIV care). We conducted a directed content analysis based on deductive coding. To establish rigor, we focused on Lincoln and Guba's criteria of rigorous qualitative methodology: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Similarities and divergences of themes were discussed during data analysis and agreement was reached before interpretation., Results: Emergent themes uncovered barriers to linkage and retention in HIV care as HIV-related stigma, having mental health illnesses including a history of substance abuse and social determinants of health such as homelessness, food insecurity, and insurance issues., Conclusion: The perspectives of pharmacists, social workers, and PWH can provide insight into barriers that should be identified and addressed in people living with HIV to enhance their linkage and retention in care., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)