Search

The article focuses on a case study of a 65-year-old recreational golfer with left hand pain and triggering of the third, fourth, and fifth digits. Despite initial nonimage-guided cortisone injections and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (rECSW), the patient developed worsening pain over the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, which was diagnosed as trigger finger due to A1 pulley thickening and sesamoid bone constriction of the flexor tendon.

Background: Open trigger finger release (OTFR) and endoscopic trigger finger release (ETFR) are effective methods in treating stenosing tenosynovitis. However, a paucity of literature exists comparing the techniques. This study describes and compares postoperative complications following OTFR and ETFR at a single institution. Methods: Patients undergoing trigger finger release between 2018 and 2020 within a single institution were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical history, surgical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Major and minor postoperative complications were assessed. Secondary outcome measures included tourniquet time and procedure time. Statistical analysis evaluated associations between postoperative complications, surgical technique, patient demographics, and surgical characteristics. Results: In total, 57 patients (80 digits) were included in the study: 42 digits treated with OTFR and 38 digits treated with ETFR. Mean follow-up time was 57.6 ± 69.0 days (range, 7-307 days) for ETFR and 34.2 ± 26.3 days (range, 6-120 days) for OTFR. Overall, major, and minor complication rates for the cohort were 8.8%, 1.8% and 7.0%, respectively. There were no major complications following ETFR and 1 following OTFR (4%), the isolated case being postoperative Chronic regional pain syndrome. Minor complication rates were similar following OTFR (8%) and ETFR (6%). Persistent digit stiffness and swelling were found to be the most prevalent minor complications (n = 2, respectively), followed by wound dehiscence (n = 1). Female patients were significantly more likely to experience postoperative complications. Conclusions: Major complications following trigger finger release are unlikely; however, minor complications are prominent. Patients treated with OTFR and ETFR showed similar postoperative complication rates. Continued investigations into the benefits of ETFR are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This article compares the rates and time-to-development of new-onset Dupuytren disease in patients with trigger finger treated by steroid injection, surgical release, or both. Methods: PearlDiver's Mariner 30 database was queried to identify patients with trigger finger between January 2010 and June 2019. One-to-one exact matching based on baseline patient demographics allowed us to create 4 identical groups defined by the type of trigger finger intervention received. Results: The matched population analyzed in this study consisted of 85 944 patients who were equally represented in the steroid injection cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), surgical release cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), steroids prior to surgery cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), and no intervention (control) cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%). A new Dupuytren diagnosis after trigger finger treatment occurred in 1 in 128 patients overall, 1 in 156 patients treated with steroid injection, and 1 in 126 patients treated with surgical release. Trigger fingers treated by steroid injection only had the lowest rates of Dupuytren disease overall (n = 137, 0.64%, P =.0424) and treatment with fasciectomy (n = 14, 0.07%, P <.0005). In all, 171 patients in the surgery cohort developed Dupuytren disease 1 year after undergoing surgical trigger finger release. Furthermore, this cohort had the highest rates of fasciectomy (n = 55, 0.26%, P <.0005) and the lowest rates of no intervention (n = 103, 0.48%, P =.0471). Trigger fingers managed by surgical release developed Dupuytren disease (mean, 56.11 days; SD, 80.93 days, log-rank P =.02) and underwent fasciectomy (mean, 49.74 days; SD, 62.27 days; log-rank P <.0005) more quickly than all other cohorts. Conclusions: Patients solely undergoing surgical release of their trigger finger had significantly higher odds and expedited rate of developing new-onset Dupuytren disease overall and undergoing subsequent treatment by fasciectomy compared with trigger fingers managed by other interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective randomized controlled study compared two injection techniques for trigger digit: either dorsal to the tendons in the proximal phalanx (PP group) or anterior to the tendons at the A1 pulley level (A1 group) in 106 patients. The primary outcome was the number of days to total relief of pain, stiffness and triggering, as recorded by the patients on visual analogue scales day-by-day for 6 weeks. The median number of days to complete symptom relief was 9 days in the PP group and 11 days in the A1 group for pain, 11 days and 15 days for stiffness and 21 and 20 days for triggering, respectively. Ninety-one per cent of all patients did not require any additional treatment, but 11 patients in both groups reported some remaining symptoms at 6 weeks. This study did not detect any significant difference between the two injection techniques, but provides detailed data of the rate and order of symptomatic relief after corticosteroid injection for this common condition. Level of evidence: I [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) after conservative treatment of trigger finger. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial compared pain reduction, symptoms and functional improvement at 12 weeks. Patients included were at least 18 years old and able to complete MHQ and VAS-pain at enrolment and 12 weeks after treatment. The MCIDs of MHQ and VAS-pain were evaluated using a distribution-based, anchor-based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-based approach. Of the 117 patients, the MCIDs of MHQ and VAS-pain using a distribution-based approach were 5.3 and 0.6, respectively; applying ROC method were 23.5 and 2.5, respectively; and using anchor questions were 15 and 2, respectively. These MCID values by anchor-based method with a minimal difference of 15 for MHQ and 2 for VAS-pain are recommended as primary evidence to determine clinically significant improvement after conservative treatment of trigger finger. Level of evidence: I [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to identify the rates and risk factors for failure of percutaneous A1 pulley release. We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent percutaneous A1 pulley release between 2015 and 2019. We defined failure as (1) pain or discomfort at the final follow-up, (2) when open release or revision percutaneous release was performed, or (3) when steroid injections were administered three or more times for symptom control. A total of 331 digits from 251 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 47 months (minimum 24 months). Complete resolution was achieved in 287 cases (87%), but 21% required steroid injection before symptoms settled. There was failure in 44 cases (13%). Involvement of the index, middle and ring fingers was significantly different between the successful and failure groups. Percutaneous A1 pulley release has a long-term success rate of 87%. The failure rate was higher when the procedure was performed on the index, middle or ring fingers. Level of evidence: III [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. Methods: We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1. Results: Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49–9.37; I2 = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD = − 1; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.76; I2 = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.39; I2 = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I2 = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I2 = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group. Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of patients undergoing primary trigger finger release (TFR) that underwent ulnar superficialis slip resection (USSR) for decompression and to determine which digit was most commonly affected. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of open TFR performed by a single surgeon. The following data were obtained: age, sex, laterality, affected digit, and consideration for USSR. All patients failed nonoperative treatment of at least 1 steroid injection. The occurrence of patients who underwent TFR and USSR and which digit(s) most commonly underwent USSR were determined. The average patient age that underwent USSR, frequency by sex, and relative occurrence of USSR in each digit were computed. Statistical calculations were conducted using χ2 analysis (P <.05). Results: A total of 911 primary open TFRs were performed in 631 patients over a 16-year period. A total of 20 TFRs in 20 patients underwent USSR (2.2%). The long finger was the most commonly affected digit (40%) that required simple decompression. Within all USSR cases, the long finger was the most commonly affected digit. The index finger was the second most affected (30%), and there were no cases in the small finger. Conclusions: This study determined the occurrence of primary TFR cases that underwent USSR, with the long finger being the most commonly affected digit. Surgeons may consider this additional procedure to perform a larger decompression than simple A1 pulley release alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Trigger finger (TF) often occurs after carpal tunnel release (CTR), but the mechanism and outcomes remain inconsistent. This study evaluated the incidence of TF after CTR and its related risk factors. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to 27 August 2022, with the following keywords: "carpal tunnel release" and "trigger finger". Studies with complete data on the incidence of TF after CTR and published full text. The primary outcome was the association between CTR and the subsequent occurrence of the TF and to calculate the pooled incidence of post-CTR TF. The secondary outcomes included the potential risk factors among patients with and without post-CTR TF as well as the prevalence of the post-CTR TF on the affected digits. Results: Ten studies with total 10,399 participants in 9 studies and 875 operated hands in one article were included for metaanalysis. CTR significantly increases the risk of following TF occurrence (odds ratio = 2.67; 95% CI 2.344-3.043; P<0.001). The pooled incidence of TF development after CTR was 7.7%. Women were more likely to develop a TF after CTR surgery (odds ratio= 2.02; 95% CI 1.054-3.873; P= 0.034). Finally, the thumb was the most susceptible fingers, followed by middle and ring fingers. Conclusions: High incidence of TF comes after CTR, and women were more susceptible than man. Clinicians were suggested to notice the potential risk of TF after CTR in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Trigger thumb is a pathologic condition of the digital pulleys and flexor tendons. To find a cutoff value of the cross-sectional area ratio of specific parts of the flexor pollicis longus tendon to diagnosis trigger thumb in the high-frequency ultrasound examination. Methods We evaluated 271 healthy volunteers and 57 patients with clinical diagnosis of trigger thumb. The cross-sectional area of the metacarpophalangeal joint of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C1) and the cross-sectional area of the midpoint of the first metacarpal of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C2) were analyzed. Results There is no difference between gender, age and left and right hands in the ratio of C1 to C2 (C1/ C2). The mean of C1/ C2 in the healthy thumb was 0.983 ± 0.103, which was significantly smaller in comparison to the diseased thumb (P

Our study purpose was to report the clinical application of five different pharmacopunctures (Sweet BV, Scolopendrae Corpus, Chukyu, Cervi Parvum Cornu, and Hominis Placenta) for trigger finger. A patient was admitted to Ba-reun-mom S Korean Medicine Clinic and diagnosed with trigger finger. Because the effects of each pharmacopuncture have been confirmed in various acute to chronic cases, we treated a patient diagnosed with trigger finger using pharmacopunctures Sweet BV and Scolopendrae Corpus at the acute phase, Chukyu pharmacopuncture at the acute to chronic phase, and pharmacopunctures Cervi Parvum Cornu and Hominis Placenta at the chronic phase. This case was measured and assessed by Quinnell’s classification of triggering and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. After treatment, the patient’s fifth finger pain and function were improved. The VAS score decreased from 5 to 0. The Quinnell’s classification of triggering score decreased from 2 to 0. This case indicated that a patient with trigger finger could be treated by five pharmacopuncture treatments according to the treatment regimen and disease progress.

Objectives: This study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of percutaneous pulley release by our newly designed needle knife in terms of cure, relapse, and complication rates. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients were allocated into male and female groups between October 2014 and September 2021. We included patients >15 years of age with a trigger finger (TF) (types II–VI). The primary outcome was the absence of a TF and pain-free movement. In contrast, the secondary outcome included second-time surgery and the number of complications such as infection and admission for antibiotics. Results: One hundred patients were male, and 157 patients were female. Males and females had mean ages of 62.45 ± 11.76 and 61.50 ± 8.57 years, respectively. The operative time was significantly longer in males than in females (7.88 ± 6.02 vs. 6.52 ± 3.74 min in males and females, respectively, P = 0.027). However, the percentages of diabetes mellitus and gout were the same in both groups. For the percutaneous methods with our needle knife, remission of the trigger was achieved in all cases. In addition, seven patients received revision and three patients with complications. After needle surgery, topical and joint pain scores were improved in both groups (from 5.09 ± 1.31 to 0.80 ± 1.56). Conclusion: The percutaneous methods with our needle knife displayed effectiveness. The cure rate was high, and the relapse rate was low. Further large-scale clinical trials comparing percutaneous needle to open surgery for releasing the TF will be needed to confirm our results.

Introduction. Orthopedic video contents published on YouTube are not scanned and do not go through an editorial evaluation process. It is important to determine the quality and content accuracy of health-related videos. Trigger finger is a common disease and the deterioration in quality of life. However, the quality, content and adequacy of YouTube videos as a source of information about this disease have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to investigate the quality and adequacy of the medical content of the videos on YouTube about trigger finger disease. Methods. In September 2022, the phrase "trigger finger" was entered in the YouTube search bar and the 50 most watched videos were included in the study, provided that the language of the video was English. Who uploaded the videos, real or animated content, number of views, upload date, number of comments, number of like-dislikes and video length were recorded. 3 orthopedic surgeons and 1 hand surgeon watched the videos simultaneously and separately. JAMA, DISCERN and GQS scores were calculated. Results. Average length of 50 videos is 321 seconds, number of views is 244,150, number of days from upload date to evaluation date is 1,789 days, VPI was 94, view ratio was 300. The average scores of 4 different surgeons from the parameters used for the quality and relevance analysis of the videos: JAMA 2, DISCERN 36, and GQS 2. The scores of 4 different surgeons were statistically compatible with each other (p = 0.000). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.906 for the JAMA score, 0.889 for the DISCERN score, and 0.831 for the GQS score. Conclusions. YouTube videos about trigger finger were low quality and unreliable. In the light of our study and other studies, the possibility of high-quality and reliable videos for patients can be increased by the evaluation and inspection of videos presented by YouTube. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness of percutaneous pulley release by our newly designed needle knife in terms of cure, relapse, and complication rates. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty‑seven patients were allocated into male and female groups between October 2014 and September 2021. We included patients >15 years of age with a trigger finger (TF) (types II–VI). The primary outcome was the absence of a TF and pain‑free movement. In contrast, the secondary outcome included second‑time surgery and the number of complications such as infection and admission for antibiotics. Results: One hundred patients were male, and 157 patients were female. Males and females had mean ages of 62.45 ± 11.76 and 61.50 ± 8.57 years, respectively. The operative time was significantly longer in males than in females (7.88 ± 6.02 vs. 6.52 ± 3.74 min in males and females, respectively, P = 0.027). However, the percentages of diabetes mellitus and gout were the same in both groups. For the percutaneous methods with our needle knife, remission of the trigger was achieved in all cases. In addition, seven patients received revision and three patients with complications. After needle surgery, topical and joint pain scores were improved in both groups (from 5.09 ± 1.31 to 0.80 ± 1.56). Conclusion: The percutaneous methods with our needle knife displayed effectiveness. The cure rate was high, and the relapse rate was low. Further large‑scale clinical trials comparing percutaneous needle to open surgery for releasing the TF will be needed to confirm our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric trigger finger (PTF) is an acquired condition that is uncommon and anatomically complex. Currently, the literature is characterized by a small number of retrospective case series with limited sample sizes. This investigation sought to evaluate the presentation, management, and treatment outcomes of PTF in a large, multicenter cohort. A retrospective review of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of PTF between 2009 and 2020 was performed at three tertiary referral hospitals. Patient demographics, PTF characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Patients and families also were contacted by telephone to assess the downstream persistence or recurrence of triggering symptoms. In total, 321 patients with 449 PTFs were included at a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 4.0 years. There were approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, and the mean age of symptom onset was 5.4 ± 5.1 years. The middle (34.7%) and index (11.6%) fingers were the most and least commonly affected digits, respectively. Overall, PTFs managed operatively achieved significantly higher rates of complete resolution compared with PTFs managed nonsurgically (97.1% vs 30.0%). Seventy-five percent of PTFs that achieved complete resolution with nonsurgical management did so within 6 months, and approximately 90% did so within 12 months. Patients with multidigit involvement, higher Quinnell grade at presentation, or palpable nodularity were significantly more likely to undergo surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete resolution between splinted versus not splinted PTFs or across operative techniques. Only 30% of the PTFs managed nonsurgically achieved complete resolution. Splinting did not improve resolution rates in children treated nonsurgically. In contrast, surgical intervention has a high likelihood of restoring motion and function of the affected digit. Therapeutic IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigger finger is a common disease with a lifetime prevalence of 2%. One of the frequently preferred non-surgical treatments is blinded injection around the A1 pulley. This study aims to compare the clinical results of ultrasound-guided and blinded corticosteroid injection in the trigger finger. Methods: In this prospective clinical study, 66 patients who had persistent symptoms of a single trigger finger were included. Patients with similar baseline characteristics such as age, gender, triggering period, and comorbidities were randomized. 34 patients had ultrasound-guided (UG), and 32 had blinded injections (BG). QDASH, VAS, time to return to work, and complications were compared between the groups. Results: The mean age was 52,66 (29–73) years. There were 18 male and 48 female patients. In the UG, the triggering resolved faster, returning to work was earlier, and the medication period was shorter (p < 0.05). A total of 17 patients who had diabetes mellitus received re-injections, 11 of which were in BG and 6 in UG (p < 0.05). Although statistically significantly lower scores were obtained in UG at the 1st and 4th weeks in the QDASH and VAS scores (p < 0.05), at the 12th and 24 weeks, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Using ultrasound guidance for corticosteroid injections is more effective for treating trigger fingers than the blinded method, leading to better results and a faster return to work in the early stages of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: None of the commonly cited risk factors for chronic hand conditions such as trigger finger (TF) delivers a convincing explanation for the striking differences among affected fingers or gender predominance. Hence, we aimed to investigate further possible TF-associated risk factors such as extrinsic mechanical constrictions caused by wedding rings. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was conducted at a single centre. Patients operated on for release of the A1 pulley from 2005 to 2019 were included. Exclusion criteria involved multiple TF and unknown marital statuses. Case attribution of patients was made with surgical A1-pulley release of the ring finger vs. controls (all other affected single fingers) with marital status equal to "married" as a risk factor. Differences in frequencies were tested using Fisher's exact test and risk factors expressed as odds ratios (OR). Models adjusting for age were analysed by logistic regression. Results: In our 188-patient cohort (60 male/128 female), the three most affected (92% of cases) were the thumb (n = 69), ring (n = 52), and middle finger (n = 52). When comparing the affected ring fingers to all other digits collectively, we found a significantly higher number of ring fingers in the married group (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.37–6.7 p = 0.005). Although marital status depended strongly on age, the odds ratio remained almost unchanged after adjusting for age. Conclusions: We conclude that any form of extrinsic mechanical constriction of fingers associated with rings increases the risk for developing one of the most common hand conditions worldwide; this may be relevant for reassessing disease-related risk. Level of evidence: Level IV, risk/prognostic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With lack of regulation and incentivisation on YouTube for high-quality healthcare information, it is important to objectively evaluate the quality of information on trigger finger – a common condition for hand surgeon referral. Methods: YouTube was queried (11/21/2021) for videos on trigger finger release surgery. Videos were excluded if they were about unrelated topics or not in English. The most viewed 59 videos were categorised by source as physician or non-physician. Two independent reviewers quantified the reliability, quality and content of each video, with inter-rater reliability assessed using Kohen's Kappa test. Reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN score with high-quality videos defined as those with scores in the sample upper 25th percentile. Content was assessed using the informational content score (ICS) with scores in the sample upper 25th percentile indicating more complete information. Two-sample t-tests and logistic regression were used to assess variations between sources. Results: Videos by physicians had higher DISCERN quality (42.6 ± 7.9, 36.4 ± 10.3; p = 0.02) and informational content (5.8 ± 2.6, 4.0 ± 1.7; p = 0.01) scores compared to those by non-physician sources. Videos by physicians were associated with increased odds of high-quality (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.7, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.3–41.3) and provided more complete patient information (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.4–48.9). The lowest DISCERN sub-scores for all videos were discussion of the uncertainties and risks associated with surgery. The lowest ICS for all videos were in the diagnosis of trigger finger (11.9%) and non-surgical prognosis (15.3%). Conclusions: Physician videos have more complete and higher quality information on trigger finger release. Additionally, discussion of treatment risks, areas of uncertainty, the diagnostic process, non-surgical prognosis and transparency on references used were identified as lacking content. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Corticosteroid injections have proven benefit in the treatment of symptomatic trigger finger; however, the immune system and tissue repair modulating properties of corticosteroids justify further consideration in surgical candidates. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between corticosteroid injections and postoperative infection in trigger finger release. Methods: A single-center retrospective review was conducted of patients seen from 2010 to 2019 to identify those who underwent trigger finger release with subsequent antibiotic prescription for chart-documented wound infection. A demographic matched cohort of 100 patients was identified for comparison. Preoperative corticosteroid injection history including timing, frequency, and dose was collected for all patients. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and presence of postoperative infection were collected from patient medical records. Superficial infection was defined as those requiring antibiotics for resolution without return to the operating room; deep infection was defined as infections that required irrigation and debridement. Results: Of 3234 patients who underwent trigger finger release, 58 (1.8%) were identified with postoperative infections, 6 (0.2%) of which were deep infections. History of corticosteroid injection was significantly more common in patients with postoperative infection. Compared with an age-matched, gender-matched, and body mass index–matched cohort, patients with postoperative infection had significantly increased rate of diabetes mellitus at 34.5% to 19% (P =.04) Conclusions: While corticosteroid injection in the preoperative period is associated with a higher rate of postoperative infection, the time before surgery and the corticosteroid dose do not appear to have an effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Finger deformities are a common reason for medical observation in children. Subtle clinical differences can have a significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Identification of the basic diagnostic and treatment principles of trigger thumb, trigger finger, and clasped thumb is of paramount importance to all general practitioners, pediatricians, and orthopedic surgeons who are involved in the care of children. The purpose of this article is to review the most important concepts regarding these important topics, focusing on etiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

Even in the first application of patients with early complaints of trigger finger, pinch strength of the hand may be affected. Therefore, it is difficult to assess the change of strength as a result of treatment in this problem. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the change of strength taking into account both measured and expected pinch strengths before and after A1 pulley release surgery. Thirty fingers (9 thumbs, 12 middle, 8 ring and 1 index fingers) of 26 patients (17 women, 9 men) who underwent A1 pulley release were included into this study. The mean age of the patients was 53 (16–71). Tip-to-tip finger pinch strengths were measured pre-operatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The expected strengths were calculated using the values obtained from the healthy side and taking into account the dominance effect. In the analysis, pre-operative and postoperative measured strength/expected strength ratios were compared. The mean of measured pinch strength/expected pinch strength ratio was 0.91 ± 0.3 pre-operatively and 1.14 ± 0.3 postoperatively (p < 0.05). With the calculation method used in this study, it was found that there was a significant increase in the tip-to-tip pinch strength after surgical A1 pulley release for the trigger finger. III (Retrospective cohort study). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to use high-frequency ultrasound guidance to compare the efficacy of percutaneous release combined with intra-tendon sheath injection (PR-ITSI) and percutaneous release only (PR-ONLY) in the treatment of adult trigger finger (TF) patients. Materials and methods: A total of 48 patients were randomly divided into PR-ITSI group and PR-ONLY group. The thickness of the A1 pulley was measured prior to surgery and 1-year after surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale score of affected fingers were evaluated at 1 day, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery. Results: The overall difference of VAS score between the two groups after treatment was statistically significant (p<0.001), while the VAS scores gradually decreased in both groups at different time-points after treatment. The VAS scores in the PR-ITSI group at 1 day and 1 month after surgery were 1.475 and 0.904 (p<0.001), respectively, which were lower than those in the PR-ONLY group. Different treatment methods had no effect on the VAS score at 1 year after surgery (p=0.055). The thickness of the A1 pulley at 1 year after surgery was lower than that before surgery (p<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in A1 pulley thickness between the two groups (p=0.095). The rate of PGI-I scale improvement by one grade at 1 day, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery in the PR-ITSI group was 15.322 times (95%CI: 4.466-52.573, p<0.001), 14.807 times (95%CI: 2.931-74.799, p=0.001), and 15.557 times (95%CI: 1.119-216.307, p=0.041), respectively, than that in the PR-ONLY group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided PR-ITSI is superior to PR-ONLY in the VAS score and PGI-I scale for adult TF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigger thumb is a pathologic condition of the digital pulleys and flexor tendons. To find a cutoff value of the cross-sectional area ratio of specific parts of the flexor pollicis longus tendon to diagnosis trigger thumb in the high-frequency ultrasound examination. Methods: We evaluated 271 healthy volunteers and 57 patients with clinical diagnosis of trigger thumb. The cross-sectional area of the metacarpophalangeal joint of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C1) and the cross-sectional area of the midpoint of the first metacarpal of flexor pollicis longus tendon (C2) were analyzed. Results: There is no difference between gender, age and left and right hands in the ratio of C1 to C2 (C1/ C2). The mean of C1/ C2 in the healthy thumb was 0.983 ± 0.103, which was significantly smaller in comparison to the diseased thumb (P < 0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, we chose the diagnostic cut-off value for the C1/ C2 to be 1.362 and 1.153 in order to differ a trigger thumb from children and adults. Conclusions: The C1/ C2 of the healthy thumb was relatively stable, with a mean value of 0.983 ± 0.103. The cutoff value of C1/C2 to distinguish healthy thumb from diseased thumb in children and adults were 1.362 and 1.153, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Le doigt à ressaut est une pathologie fréquente dont la prise en charge a été révolutionnée par les progrès de l'échographie. Dans les formes résistantes au traitement médical de première intention (infiltrations cortisonées), les patients peuvent se voir proposer un traitement percutané, peu invasif et qui permet d'éviter un geste chirurgical classique dont les suites post-opératoires sont plus longues. La section de poulie A1 peut être réalisée avec une aiguille intramusculaire (IM) de 21 gauges (G) ou un outil dédié (couteau). Ces 2 techniques ont démontré leur efficacité à court et moyen terme. Trigger finger is a frequent pathology whose management has been revolutionized by the progress of ultrasound. In forms that are resistant to first-line medical treatment (cortisone injection), patients may be offered percutaneous treatment, which is minimally invasive and avoids a conventional surgical procedure with longer post-operative effects. A1 pulley sectioning can be performed with a 21-gauge intramuscular (IM) needle or a dedicated tool (knife). These 2 techniques have demonstrated their effectiveness in the short and medium term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The palmar aponeurosis or "A0 pulley" may play a role in trigger finger pathology. This study assesses the involvement of the A0 pulley in patients receiving trigger finger release. Methods: This single-surgeon, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted among consenting patients with symptomatic trigger finger. Intraoperative coin toss was used to randomize initial release of either the A0 or A1 pulley. Following release, active flexion and extension of the affected digit were examined. The remaining pulley was then released in sequence, and clinical trigger status was recorded. Results: Thirty fingers from 24 patients were released; 17 fingers received A0 release first, and 13 received A1 release. Following initial A0 release, 8 fingers (47%) demonstrated complete resolution of symptoms, 4 (24%) demonstrated improvement but incomplete resolution of triggering, and 5 (29.4%) demonstrated no improvement. Following initial A1 release, 6 fingers (46%) demonstrated complete resolution, 3 (23%) demonstrated improvement but incomplete resolution of triggering, and 4 (31%) demonstrated no improvement. All patients demonstrated complete resolution after surgical release of both sites. Neither initial A1 release nor initial A0 release was statistically associated with complete, incomplete, or failed symptom resolution. Conclusions: These data implicate the A0 pulley as the primary cause of 31% to 47% of trigger fingers in our study. Although larger trials are needed to validate these results, our study suggests that release of both A0 and A1 pulleys may offer greater symptom resolution than release of the A1 pulley alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigger finger is a common hand complaint of the general population. Limited literature exists implicating a low-estrogen state in patients on aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy for breast cancer who develop trigger finger. The authors' objective was to determine the incidence and treatment outcomes of this population. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer on AI who developed trigger finger from 2010 to 2019. The total population of patients during this time served as our population, and patients with breast cancer not on AI with trigger finger served as our control. Primary outcomes included total number of injections and need for surgery. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for surgery. χ2 analysis and logistical regression model determined the significance of primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Results: In all, 192 patients of a population size of 664 751 met our study group criteria. The study group showed a higher incidence of trigger finger (5.1% vs 1.3%; P <.001) compared with our population. Patients treated with AI for breast cancer had both higher incidence of trigger finger (5.1% vs 1.5%, P <.001) and injections (77.1% vs 66.5%, P <.001) compared with patients not on AI therapy. Independent risk factors requiring surgical treatment were found in patients with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 3.54; P =.01) and in patients with concomitant radiation therapy (OR, 3.17; P =.02). Conclusions: This study demonstrates for the first time the incidence, treatment outcomes, and surgical risk factors of trigger finger in patients on AI therapy for breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trigger finger is a common hand disorder; however, its pathogenesis remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate mast cells, fibroblast activators that synthesize collagen, in the tendon sheaths of trigger fingers. We investigated the presence of mast cells and their association with changes in the collagen content of the tendon sheath and clinical data. We performed a multicenter prospective study of 77 adult patients with trigger finger who had undergone resection of the first annular pulley between August 2012 and January 2020. The tendon sheath was immunostained with an anti-tryptase antibody to confirm mast cell presence. The percentage of collagen in the tendon sheath was determined by picrosirius red staining observed through a polarization microscope. The clinical data, including the duration from symptom onset to surgery, severity, pain numerical rating scale, and Hand20 scores, were evaluated. Tryptase-positive mast cells were recognized in 83.5% of all specimens. The mast cell presence group (Group P) had a significantly higher percentage of type-3 collagen in the tendon sheath than the non-mast cell presence group (Group N) (Group P, 15.6%; Group N, 12.7%; p = 0.03). Moreover, Group P had significantly higher pain numerical rating scale (Group P; 5, Group N; 3, p = 0.04) and Hand20 (Group P; 35.5, Group N; 13.0, p = 0.01) scores than Group N. These findings suggest that mast cell presence in the tendon sheath of the trigger finger is related to the pathology and clinical symptoms of trigger finger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this randomised prospective study is to compare the outcomes of traditional open trigger digit release versus ultrasound-guided modified small needle-knife (SNK) percutaneous release in the treatment of trigger digits. Methods: Patients with grade 2 and above trigger digits were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to traditional open surgery (OS) or ultrasound-guided modified SNK percutaneous release group. The patients were followed up for 7, 30 and 180 days after treatment and data with regard to visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Quinnell grading (QG) was collected and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study with 30 in the OS group and 42 in the SNK group. VAS scores and QG of the two groups significantly decreased at 7 days and 30 days after treatment compared to before treatment, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was also no differences between the two groups at 180 days and between the values at 30 days and 180 days. Conclusions: The outcomes of ultrasound-guided SNK percutaneous release is similar to traditional OS. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this prospective study of 55 patients was to analyse the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship between disability and physical and psychological variables after conservative treatment of trigger finger and to determine the predictive factors for the post-treatment disability score and change in disability score. The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Potential predictive factors included pain, number of triggering events, depression, anxiety and kinesiophobia. Disability correlated strongly with anxiety, moderately with pain and depression and weakly with triggering and kinesiophobia. The change in depression score correlated significantly with the change in disability score. Post-treatment pain and anxiety scores accounted for 47% of the explained variance in disability score. Improvement in depression after treatment accounted for 18% of the explained variance in disability change score. Psychological variables appear to be potential predictors of disability. Level of evidence: IV [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumen: Antecedentes y objetivo: Las infiltraciones de corticoides son efectivas en el tratamiento de los dedos en gatillo pero el dolor percibido por el paciente durante la inyección es un efecto acompañante siempre presente. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad y el dolor percibido durante una infiltración corticoidea depositada fuera de la vaina tendinosa utilizando la técnica comisural dorsal. Material y método: Se incluyeron 126 pacientes consecutivos. Se realizó una infiltración esteroidea subcutánea (fuera de la vaina) a través de la comisura dorsal. En los casos en que los signos o síntomas persistieron, se ofreció una segunda infiltración. Se registró el dolor percibido durante la infiltración mediante la escala visual analógica, el cuestionario DASH antes del tratamiento y al final de seguimiento, la tasa de éxito y las complicaciones. Resultados: Fueron 86 mujeres y 40 hombres con una edad media de 61 años. La puntuación media del dolor durante la infiltración fue de 3,8. Doce pacientes se perdieron durante el seguimiento. El éxito global fue del 68% y el éxito tras una única inyección fue del 54%. El mejor resultado se obtuvo en el dedo anular. Los pacientes que no habían sido operados previamente del síndrome del túnel carpiano respondieron mejor. No se objetivaron complicaciones. Conclusiones: La infiltración esteroidea fuera de la vaina tendinosa y utilizando la técnica comisural dorsal es efectiva y segura en el tratamiento de los dedos en resorte. Parece ser menos dolorosa que los resultados publicados para la técnica palmar sobre la línea media, aunque esto debe evaluarse en un estudio diseñado para ello. Abstract: Background and objective: Steroid injections are effective in the treatment of trigger digits but the pain during the injection is an always-present accompanying effect. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and perceived pain during an out-of-sheath corticosteroid injection through the dorsal webspace in the treatment of trigger digits. Material and method: A total of 126 consecutive patients were included. A subcutaneous (out-of-sheath) corticosteroid injection was performed through the dorsal webspace in all digits. In cases where signs or symptoms persisted, a second injection was offered. Visual analog scale for pain during the injection, DASH questionnaire, success rate and complications were collected. Results: There were 86 women and 40 men with a mean age of 61 years. The mean visual analog scale for pain during the injection was 3.8. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. The overall success was 68% and success after a single injection was 54%. The best result was achieved on the ring finger. Patients who were not previously operated on carpal tunnel syndrome responded better. No complications were noted. Conclusions: The extra-sheath corticosteroid injection through the dorsal webspace is effective and safe. It seems to be less painful than the reported scores for the palmar midline technique although it should be assessed in a comparative study.

Abstract Background The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided needle release of A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection by comparing it with ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley alone. Methods A total of 49 patients (55 fingers, thumb) with trigger fingers were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-seven fingers were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley alone (monotherapy group), and 28 fingers were treated with needle release of the A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection (combination group). Visual analog scale (VAS), Froimson scale, postoperative recurrence rate, and thickness of A1 pulley at baseline, Week-2, Week-12, and Month-6 were recorded. Results Higher clinical cure rates were observed in the combination group at Week-2 after treatment among patients with the Froimson scale Grade III and IV (p 0.05). Conclusions Ultrasonography-guided needle release of A1 pulley plus corticosteroid injection was superior to ultrasonography-guided A1 pulley needle release alone during early-stage treatment of severe patients with trigger fingers. Moreover, ultrasonography-guided A1 pulley needle release combined with corticosteroid injection narrows the thickness of the A1 pulley. It is necessary to carry out preoperative evaluation and individualized treatment for patients of various severities.

To compare the efficacy and safety of the USG-guided vs blind pulley release (PR) for Trigger Finger by performing a meta-analysis of all relevant studies in the published literature. A thorough and methodical search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out. Review Manager Software (RevMan) 5.4.1 was used to analyze the extracted data, and the results were displayed as forest plots with matching 95 % confidence intervals. The primary efficacy outcome i.e. residual triggering was significantly lower in USG-guided PR as compared to blind PR with a risk ratio of 0.16 (95 % CI 0.03–0.87), p = 0.03. The primary safety outcome i.e., percentage of complications was lower in the USG-guided procedure group, although the result was not statistically significant with a risk ratio of 0.25 (95 % CI 0.05–1.16), p = 0.08 with I2 of 0 %. The operation time was longer in the USG-guided PR as compared to the blind procedure, although the difference was not statistically significant with a mean difference of 5.36 (95 % CI: −3.73, 14.46), p = 0.25. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score at 4 weeks was significantly lower in USG-guided PR versus blind PR with a mean difference of −0.40 (95 % CI: −0.68, −0.33), p = 0.004. When compared to blind PR, ultrasound-guided A1 PR for trigger finger was proven to be a safer and more economical method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jiaxuan Yang,1,&ast; Bin Ma,2,&ast; Hao Zhong,1 Yue Zhang,1 Jiang Zhu,1 Yong Ni1 1Pain Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; 2Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jiang Zhu; Yong Ni, Tel +86 18013575733, Email zhujiangsz@126.com; niyong2148@163.comPurpose: This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy on unembalmed cadavers.Materials and Methods: Sixty digits (from six cadavers, three male and three female) were split into two groups using stratified randomization. All procedures were completed by a single doctor with rich experience in ultrasound-guided treatment. In the acupotomy group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a needle-knife; while in the needle group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a 21-gauge needle. Two groups completed six thumbs and 24 fingers, respectively. Another anatomist, blinded to the two techniques, assessed the safety, including the minimum distance between the incision and the neurovascular; flexor tendon, neurovascular and A2 pulley injury or not. Completeness release of the A1 pulley was recorded as effectiveness.Results: No neurovascular or A2 pulley injuries were recorded. However, the incision of the thumb in both groups biased to the radial side (P < 0.05), while the incision of the finger biased to the ulnar side (P < 0.05). No significant flexor tendon injury was found, and only five cases (16.7%) had minor scratches in the acupotomy group; while in the needle group, 15 cases had minor scratches and lacerations occurred in three cases. The flexor tendon injury rate was 60%. Compared with the needle, ultrasound-guided acupotomy release is safer (P < 0.05). The ultrasound-guided acupotomy technique was significantly more likely to result in a complete A1 pulley release compared to the needle technique (28 of 30 [93.3%] versus 11 of 30 [36.7%]; P < 0.05).Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy is a safe and effective technique. When releasing the thumb by ultrasound-guided, be careful not to bias to the radial side to avoid neurovascular injury, while when releasing a finger, be careful not to bias to the ulnar side.Keywords: ultrasonography, acupotomy, trigger finger, anatomical study

Background. The thickening of A1 pulley of the tendon sheath limits the excursion of flexor tendon. Stenosing tenosynovitis causes finger movements dysfunction and pain. Objective. To analyze early and late outcomes of patients with stenosing tenosynovitis after surgical treatment – anulotomy. Methods. All patients had standard surgical procedure – open anulotomy of A1 pulley. Pain (verbal pain scale), hand and arm function (QuickDASH) and complications were recorded before surgery, after 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post surgery. Results. There were 45 patients, 29 (64%) female, 16 (36%) male. The highest pain score was recorded before surgery median 5 (IQR 5). The lowest pain score median 2 (IQR 2) was recorded after 6 months post surgery. The difference of the results after 1 week, 3 months and 6 months was statistically significant p

Prolotherapy is used to treat chronic musculoskeletal diseases. The efficacy of prolotherapy was recently acknowledged. However, it has not been usually used to treat trigger fingers. Our study was a case report of aggravated flexor tenosynovitis and a fibrous nodule on thickened A1 pulley after repetitive prolotherapy for treating the trigger finger. A 47-year-old electrical engineer complained of a locked and painful triggering in his right ring finger. Preoperative ultrasonography revealed a large hyperechoic mass on the A1 pulley and tenosynovitis. Mass resection and tenosynovectomy were performed. The histological examination revealed a benign fibrous nodule without inflammatory cells. There were no complications at 6 months post-operative, and the patient regained a full range of motion. Reducing inflammation around the flexor tendon and A1 pulley was the most important strategy for the non-surgical management of the trigger finger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The thickening of A1 pulley of the tendon sheath limits the excursion of flexor tendon. Stenosing tenosynovitis causes finger movements dysfunction and pain. Objective. To analyze early and late outcomes of patients with stenosing tenosynovitis after surgical treatment - anulotomy. Methods. All patients had standard surgical procedure - open anulotomy of A1 pulley. Pain (verbal pain scale), hand and arm function (QuickDASH) and complications were recorded before surgery, after 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post surgery. Results. There were 45 patients, 29 (64%) female, 16 (36%) male. The highest pain score was recorded before surgery median 5 (IQR 5). The lowest pain score median 2 (IQR 2) was recorded after 6 months post surgery. The difference of the results after 1 week, 3 months and 6 months was statistically significant p < 0.001. The worst hand and arm function was before surgery and 1 week post surgery. Accordingly: medians 52 (IQR 33) and 52 (IQR 35). Full hand function recovery was noticed after 6 months post surgery median 0 (IQR 11). The difference is statistically significant p < 0.001. Conclusions. Surgical treatment, open anulotomy is one of the most effective methods for stenosing tenosynovitis. After this procedure pain and hand function improves greatly. However, for some patients it might cause discomfort of the hand because of the scar's sensitivity and location. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trigger finger is the most common flexor tendinopathy affecting the general population. We evaluated the effects of adding a static metacarpophalangeal joint splint to corticosteroid injection for the management of trigger finger in the short term. Methods: We carried out a randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms in Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at a university hospital. We randomly allocated 60 participants (34 women) with trigger fingers other than the thumb to two groups (both n = 30). The mean (SD) age was 41.5 (7.6) years. All participants received a single injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 0.5 ml of lidocaine at the A1 pulley. Patients in the splint group wore a full time static splint for blocking the metacarpophalangeal joint for 3 months. The primary outcome was the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and the secondary outcomes were Boston questionnaire scores for symptom severity and functional status, grip strength, and the stages of stenosing tenosynovitis. We measured the outcomes at baseline, and in 1 and 3 months post‐intervention. Results: Both interventions were effective; however, the splint group showed more reductions in pain (p = 0.013) and symptom severity (p = 0.047) and a larger decrease in the stages of tenosynovitis (p = 0.004) after 3 months. There was no significant difference in decreasing functional scores between the groups (p = 0.162). The splint group had a better (but not statistically significant) restoring grip strength (p = 0.056). Conclusion: Wearing of a static metacarpophalangeal joint splint for 3 months following a single injection of corticosteroid increases and stabilises the benefits of the treatment for trigger finger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Ophthalmologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

El dedo en resorte es un motivo de consulta frecuente en el que las infiltraciones de corticoides juegan un papel terapéutico relevante en los grados de severidad intermedios cuando el tratamiento conservador no ha funcionado. Sin embargo, no existen criterios que permitan seleccionar qué pacientes se beneficiarán más de este procedimiento. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es identificar los condicionantes de éxito terapéutico de las infiltraciones de corticoides en estos pacientes. Diseñamos un estudio prospectivo longitudinal basado en práctica clínica habitual con pacientes adultos, con diagnóstico clínico de dedo en resorte grado II o III, a quienes se les realizó una infiltración de 20 mg de acetato de triamcinolona. Las variables desenlace fueron el alcanzar un grado Quinnell I o reducir en al menos una categoría la severidad del cuadro clínico, 2 meses después del procedimiento. Para determinar los condicionantes del alcance de los objetivos se realizó una modelización predictiva de regresión logística binaria utilizando aquellas variables que tuvieron una satisfactoria correlación univariante. Se incluyeron 74 pacientes a lo largo de 3 años, 42 de los cuales (61,8%) tenían un grado Quinnell III. Tras la infiltración, 22 (32,4%) alcanzaron la resolución completa y 50 (73,5%), la resolución parcial. Las variables engrosamiento tendinoso (HR: 10,72; IC 95%: 2,88-39,93; p < 0,001) y tiempo de evolución (HR: 1,23; IC 95%: 1,02-1,49; p = 0,027) demostraron ser condicionantes predictoras del éxito terapéutico en la resolución completa. Para la modelización para resolución parcial las mismas variables demostraron ser condicionantes predictoras (HR: 5,57; IC 95%: 1,38-22,41; p = 0,016 y HR: 1,18; IC 95% 0,99-1,41; p = 0,051, respectivamente). El engrosamiento de la polea no demostró capacidad predictiva en ninguno de los 2 modelos. Nuestros resultados indican que la demostración de engrosamiento del aparato flexor del dedo es el principal condicionante del éxito de las infiltraciones de corticoides en esta afección. Esto concuerda con los hallazgos histológicos de especímenes obtenidos tanto de tejido tenosinovial y de poleas. En los primeros se demuestra, además de un infiltrado de características inflamatorias la presencia de células condrocitoides productoras de ácido hialurónico. Si bien el éxito terapéutico de las infiltraciones en estudios previos alcanza el 70%, la tasa de recidiva es semejante a los 12 meses. La selección de pacientes con engrosamiento tendinoso asegura el éxito terapéutico a corto plazo, podría reducir la recidiva a largo plazo, y evitar el retraso de la cirugía de liberación. Trigger finger is a frequent complaint in which corticosteroid infiltrations play a relevant therapeutic role in intermediate degrees of severity when conservative treatment has not worked. However, there are no criteria to select which patients will benefit most from this procedure. The present study aimed to identify the factors leading to the therapeutic success of corticosteroid infiltration in these patients. We designed a prospective longitudinal study based on routine clinical practice with adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of trigger finger grade II or III on the Quinnell scale, who underwent an infiltration of 20 mg of triamcinolone acetate. The outcome variables were to achieve a Quinnell grade I or reduce the severity of the symptoms by at least one category two months after the procedure. To identify the determinants of complete or partial therapeutic success, binary logistic regression predictive modelling was performed using those variables that had a satisfactory univariate correlation. 74 patients were included over three years, 42 of whom (61.8%) were classified as Quinnell grade III. After infiltration, 22 (32.4%) achieved complete resolution and 50 (73.5%) partial resolution. The variables tendon thickening (HR 10.72; 95%CI 2.88-39.93; P <.001) and progression time (HR 1.23; 95%CI 1.02-1.49; P =.027) proved to be predictors of therapeutic success in complete resolution. For the modelling for partial resolution, the same variables proved to be determining predictors (HR 5.57; 95%CI 1.38-22.41; P =.016 and HR 1.18; 95%CI.99-1.41; P =.051, respectively). Pulley thickening did not demonstrate predictive ability in either model. Our results indicate that the demonstration of finger flexor apparatus thickening is the main determining factor for the success of corticosteroid infiltrations in this pathology. This is in agreement with the histological findings of specimens obtained from both tenosynovial and pulley tissue. In the former, in addition to an infiltrate of inflammatory characteristics, the presence of chondrocytoid cells producing hyaluronic acid is demonstrated. Although the therapeutic success of infiltrations in previous studies reaches 70%, the recurrence rate is similar after 12 months. The selection of patients with tendon thickening ensures therapeutic success in the short term, could reduce recurrence in the long term, and avoid delay in release surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Traditional dogma regarding management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with trigger digit symptoms holds that A1 pulley release should be avoided. Surgical release was thought to further destabilize the metacarpophalangeal joint. Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have limited the development of hand deformities. Despite advances in RA treatment, many textbooks continue to discourage release of the A1 pulley in RA patients. The aim of this study was to determine if this belief is consistent with current trends in surgical management of trigger digits in patients with RA. Methods: Active Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) were surveyed on their training and current practices as related to RA patients with trigger digits. Results: Five hundred three surveys were completed (16% response rate). During training, 55% of ASSH Members were taught to avoid releasing the A1 pulley in RA patients. Seventy-one percent of respondents currently release the A1 pulley in RA patients with no preexisting deformities, no tenosynovial thickening, or if tenosynovectomy and flexor digitorum superficialis slip excision fail to relieve triggering. Forty percent reported that their practice has evolved toward more frequent release of the A1 pulley in RA patients. Conclusion: The majority of ASSH Active Members were taught during training to avoid surgical release of the A1 pulley in RA patients to prevent acceleration of finger deformities. Indications and contraindications for A1 pulley release are evolving along with the improved natural history of RA associated with the use of biologic DMARDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study was designed to compare the 1-year outcome among the groups with different low-dosage triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections for trigger finger., Methods: In the study period, trigger digits were initially injected with 2, 4, or 8 mg TA. We checked whether they had a second injection or surgery during the following year by either patients' revisit or telephone interview. The groups with different injections were compared according to recurrence and symptom relief period. We also assessed the 6-week outcome to confirm the short-term improvement., Results: One-hundred ninety-eight digits were enrolled. About 60% of the injected fingers required additional treatment in each group without significant difference. The interval between the initial injection and additional treatment in the recurrent cases averaged 5 months in the 2 and 4 mg TA groups, being significantly extended for a short term of 1.5 months in the 8 mg TA group. All the groups showed a significant improvement of the patients' clinical severity at 6 weeks after injection without any difference among the groups. There was no adverse event., Conclusions: Low-dosage TA injection for trigger finger within 8 mg yielded satisfactory results, not being inferior to those with higher dosage up to 40 mg in comparison with previous reports. Our findings implied that increasing TA dosage might bring short-extended symptom relief, however, not reduce the recurrence. While not offering great benefit, lower dosage TA injection for trigger finger can be chosen, aiming for cost-effectiveness, safety, and small injection site pain., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Open trigger finger release is generally performed in the operating room in an outpatient setting. Its complication rate widely varies between 1% and 43%. Our goal was to determine whether performing this surgery in the clinic is a safe and viable alternative to performing this surgery in the operating room. Methods: All open trigger finger releases performed at our clinic between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Each surgery was performed by the same fellowship-trained hand surgeon using a standard open technique with an Esmarch tourniquet and without the use of epinephrine. Five hundred twenty seven finger releases were performed in 514 patients. Complications were defined as signs or symptoms requiring further treatment. Results: There were 33 documented complications in the 527 fingers (6.3%). The most common complications were minor wound complications, including 17 (3.2%) with localized cellulitis, 2 (0.4%) with a superficial infection, 4 (0.8%) with stitch abscesses, and 5 (0.9%) with wound dehiscence. All minor complications resolved quickly with oral antibiotics and supportive care. Five patients (0.9%) required further operative management. Of these 5, 2 (0.4%) had a deep infection, 1 had chronic dehiscence, and 2 (0.4%) required flexor tenosynovectomy for persistent pain and stiffness. Conclusions: Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room. Clinical relevance: Performing open trigger finger surgery in the office is safe. We continue to perform this surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, when access to operating rooms and personal protective equipment is limited.

A retrospective study of patients with symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis was conducted to assess the prevalence of other disorders of the hand. Another disorder of the hand was associated in 49% of cases. A systematic clinical examination of the whole hand must be performed preoperatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]