Search

Background and Objectives: This study evaluated the utilization and outcomes of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters as thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients undergoing surgery., Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of surgical cancer patients who received perioperative prophylactic IVC filters. Primary clinical endpoints included venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence and filter complications. A statistical correlative analysis was conducted to identify risk factors related to pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and filter thrombi, as well as advanced technique filter removal and mortality at 6 months., Results: A total of 252 surgical oncology patients (median age, 59; female 51%) received IVC filters for the perioperative prevention of PE. Primary surgical sites included spine (n = 91, 36%), orthopedic extremity/joint (n = 49, 19%), genitourinary (n = 47, 19%), brain/cranial (n = 40, 16%), abdominal (n = 18, 7%), multisite (n = 4, 2%), and chest (n = 3, 1%). Moreover, 15% of patients experienced DVTs in the postplacement preretrieval period, while 2% (n = 6) of patients experienced definitive PEs. A total of 36% of IVC filters were ultimately retrieved, with an average filter dwell time of 7.4 months. Complications occurred in one retrieval., Conclusion: Prophylactic perioperative IVC filters in surgical cancer patients resulted in minimal complications while ultimately resulting in a low incidence of PE., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolism in patients who otherwise cannot receive anticoagulation for venous thrombosis. While generally safe and effective, complications can arise, especially after prolonged implantation. Timely retrieval is essential once the indication for insertion has resolved. However, encountering patients with long-standing embedded filters is not uncommon. This case report discusses the successful retrieval of a permanent Greenfield IVC filter after 29 years., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose of Review: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and morbidity, and presents a major burden to healthcare systems. The field has seen rapid growth with development of innovative clot reduction technologies, as well as ongoing multicenter trials that may completely revolutionize care of PE patients. However, current paucity of robust clinical trials and guidelines often leave individual physicians managing patients with acute PE in a dilemma., Recent Findings: The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) was developed as a platform to rapidly engage multiple specialists to deliver evidence-based, organized and efficient care and help address some of the gaps in knowledge. Several centers investigating outcomes following implementation of PERT have demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive-care unit stays, lower use of inferior vena cava filters, and in some instances improved mortality. Since the advent of PERT, early findings demonstrate promise with improved outcomes after implementation of PERT. Incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into PERT has also shown promise with more streamlined care and reducing response times. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the impact of PERT model on care delivery and clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: This study aimed to characterize radiographic characteristics on computed tomography venography and risk factors of inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) in situ after retrievable vena cava filter (VCF) placement., Methods: Between September 2018 and June 2023, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with or without IVCT in situ following VCF placement. Patient baseline demographics, presentation of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT), thrombus characteristics, concurrent pulmonary embolism, comorbidities and risk factors for LEDVT, and IVCT and VCF-related information were collected and analysed. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: One hundred and seventeen eligible patients were included, regionally isolated filling-defect surrounding the support pillars of VCF and contacting inferior vena cava (IVC) wall on computed tomography venography images were identified, clots were more frequently found on the minor axis or anterior wall of IVC. Univariable analyses suggested that the incidence of IVCT in situ (31.6%, 37/117) was closely associated with age (P = .001), thrombus limb (left (P = .001) and bilateral side (P = .001)), hypertension (P = .008), filter shapes (P < .001), short IVC diameter (P = .009) or magnification percentage (P = .004), and long IVC diameter (P = .006). Multivariable analyses suggested that bilateral side LEDVT (OR, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.56-15.51; P = .007) and increased short IVC magnification percentage (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .013) statistically significant increase the IVCT in situ risk, whereas increased age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; P = .013) and short IVC diameter (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; P = .026) were associated with decreased odds against IVCT in situ., Conclusions: IVCT in situ represents regionally isolated filling-defect at points of filter contact with IVC wall. Bilateral side LEDVT and increased short IVC magnification percentage may be potential risk factors impacting the occurrence of IVCT in situ, while increased age and short IVC diameter may decrease the incidence of IVCT in situ and seem to be protective factor against IVCT in situ emergence., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to analyze the luminal changes in the iliocaval veins and their effects on the development of signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease manifesting from inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement., Methods: This was a retrospective observations study; deidentified patients with an IVC filter placed with subsequent luminal changes were included. All patients had a computerized tomography (CT) scan with or without ultrasound and those who underwent an intervention for the obstruction had also venography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The diameter of IVC and iliac veins was measured from the near wall to the far wall. IVC diameters measured less than 12 mm were considered to be retractions. Signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease were obtained from patient charts and were reported according to the highest CEAP class. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, presenting diameter changes as a mean with standard deviation and a range of diameters included., Results: Overall, 76 patients were included in this study, of whom 66 had occlusion of the IVC or the Iliac veins. Luminal changes of the IVC were observed in all patients. A total of 58 patients presented with chronic post-thrombotic changes in both the IVC and iliac veins. There were 4 patients that had a luminal reduction with no filling defects or post-thrombotic changes. Average IVC diameter and iliac vein diameter was measured to be 8.3 ± 1.4 mm and 4.6 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. Patients most frequently presented with extremity swelling, but other signs such as venous ulceration or skin damage were observed., Conclusions: Permanent luminal changes of the IVC and iliac veins were observed as a result of IVC filter placement and such patients commonly present with signs and symptoms of chronic venous disease. Together, with other known filter complications, these observations add more reasons for a timely retrieval. When such changes occur, patients' appropriate symptoms can be successfully treated. The permanent changes made by filter placement in the IVC and iliac veins further support filter retrieval in a timely fashion. The luminal changes induced by filter placement should be recognized early, particularly in symptomatic patients who can be safely treated with endovenous procedures., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients is an uncommon but serious diagnosis that has an array of therapeutic options and challenges. An assessment of the existing literature on management of pediatric patients with VTE was conducted. The interventions reviewed include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, thrombectomy, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, and venous stenting. For each intervention, a discussion of mechanism of action, indications, contraindications, and potential complications was performed. While anticoagulants are considered the first-line pediatric VTE treatment, many drugs remain investigational in this patient population and treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult practice. Thrombolysis may be indicated in cases of acute thrombosis requiring more rapid clot resolution but presents a greater bleeding risk than anticoagulation. Similarly, thrombectomy also provides rapid clot resolution and offers a larger therapeutic window and usage in more mature thrombi than thrombolysis. In select patient groups, IVC filters may be indicated in the prevention of PE but present with inherent thrombogenicity and risk of migration. The data regarding pediatric VTE treatment options, monitoring, and long term outcomes is limited compared to the adult population. The relatively few clinical trials including pediatric patients have a relatively small sample size and are heterogenous with regards to predisposing factors that further exacerbate generalizability. Additional research is needed to help construct and evaluate a robust treatment algorithm for pediatric patients with VTE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

An 88-year-old woman complained of right quadrant abdominal pain and severe edema in both legs. She had a history of pulmonary embolism one month ago. Abdomen CT showed a huge hepatic cyst compressing the intrahepatic portion of the inferior vena cava (IVC). The venogram CT showed multifocal thrombosis in the iliocaval and both lower extremity veins. Percutaneous hepatic cyst drainage was carried out. Fluid analysis presented leukocytosis, which suggested an infected hepatic cyst. To prevent secondary pulmonary thromboembolism, an IVC filter was inserted before catheter drainage for the hepatic cyst. One week later, abdominal pain was relieved. Then, sclerotherapy for the remnant hepatic cyst was performed by ethanol. Follow-up CT showed an increased amount of thrombosis in the iliocaval and left calf vein, but the IVC filter prevented another thromboembolic event successfully. The patient started dabigatran, a new oral anticoagulant, and compression stockings were applied to both legs. After one month, no visible thrombosis in the pelvis or either extremity was detected in abdominal CT. This case suggests that a huge hepatic cyst, especially with infection, should be considered as a possible cause of deep vein thrombosis if no other risk factors for thromboembolism exist.

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of ultra-short echo time (UTE) MRA for assessment of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and evaluate the impact of different imaging protocols at 3.0 T, using conventional Cartesian MRA (cMRA) as the reference standard. Methods: Patients with IVC-filters were recruited for this prospective IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Subjects underwent contrast-enhanced breath-held and a free-breathing 3D radial acquisition UTE-MRA (bhUTE, fbUTE) at three different flip angles (FA: 10°, 15°, 20°) to optimize T1-weighted image quality. Two radiologists performed a direct comparison consensus reading to assess the optimal FA. Image quality (IQ) of both UTE techniques at the best FA was rated independently on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = non-diagnostic, 3 = excellent) and compared to 3D T1-weighted breath-held cMRA. Results: Nine subjects were recruited. Low FAs of 10° were rated best for both UTE techniques. fbUTE was excellent (3, IQR: 2; 3) and significantly better for IVC-filter depiction than cMRA (2, IQR: 0.75; 2, p = 0.001) and bhUTE (1.5, IQR: 0.75; 2, p < 0.001). Both UTE techniques showed significantly less filter-related artifacts (fbUTE: 28%, bhUTE: 33%) than cMRA (89%, p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). However, IQ of bhUTE was generally degraded due to high image noise and low image contrast. IQ of the IVC venogram was best with cMRA. Clinically relevant signal voids were only observed with the cage-shaped OptEase filter. Conclusion: UTE-MRA is feasible at 3.0 T for the assessment of IVC-filters, particularly using a free-breathing protocol. Larger studies are needed to investigate the clinical utility of free-breathing UTE-MRA for assessment of IVC-filter-related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Superior vena cava filter is safe and feasible. • Superior vena cava filter is rare. • We report a case of a superior vena cava filter through jugular access. Venous thromboembolism is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis (UEDVT) may be a cause of pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice for venous thromboembolism, which is associated with low hemorrhagic complications. However, there are situations that anticoagulation becomes contraindicated as gastrointestinal tract hemorrhages, stroke, progression of deep venous thrombosis in the presence of adequate anticoagulation, where the vena cava filter is recommended. Patient 65 years old, female undergoing neurosurgical treatment of a mass suggestive of schwannoma with asymmetrical edema in the right upper limb, confirming the acute deep venous thrombosis by Doppler ultrassonogarphy. Anticoagulation was contraindicated by neurosurgery and after a multidisciplinary discussion, the superior vena cava filter was chosen. The Retrievable Celect™ Filter was implant in superior vena cava and may be considered as an alternative therapeutic method in cases where anticoagulation can not be performed. Superior vena cava filter is controversial, but is safe, feasible and effective, in preventing symptomatic pulmonary embolisms in patients in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trends in the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) who are stratified according to whether they are stable or unstable (in shock or ventilator dependent) may show where improvements of management could be made according to the best evidence that we now have.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study based on administrative data, 1999-2014, from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample.Results: In-hospital all-cause mortality in unstable patients who received an IVC filter was lower in each year of investigation and in all age groups. Mortality from 1999 to 2014 was 10,140 of 35,230 (28.8%) with an IVC filter compared with 54,018 of 116,642 (46.3%) without a filter (P <0.0001). In stable patients from 1999 to 2014, mortality with an IVC filter was 31,909 of 546,858 (5.8%) with an IVC filter compared with 220,443 of 3,367,783 (6.5%) without a filter (P <0.0001). In patients ages > 80 years, mortality in stable patients with an IVC filter was 7,438 of 114,457 (6.5%) with an IVC filter compared with 64,113 of 567,348 (11.3%) without an IVC filter (P <0.0001). The number of stable patients who received an IVC filter decreased from 2010 to 2014, but even in those years the largest number of IVC filters was inserted in stable patients, 194,502 of 212,611 (91.5%).Conclusions: Mortality is markedly reduced in unstable patients who receive an IVC filter. Despite this, the proportion of unstable patients who receive an IVC filter is decreasing. The largest number of IVC filters continues to be inserted in stable patients, although there is no evidence of a clinically meaningful reduced mortality with IVC filters in stable patients unless age >80 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulation is the treatment of choice in deep venous thrombosis; IVC filters can be placed in cases where anti coagulation is absolutely contra indicated. IVC filters are not without complications, some of which can be life-threatening. If detected early and managed timely and appropriately, a crisis can be averted. We report a complication—IVC wall penetration by a retrievable IVC filter, detected incidentally during a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are typically used for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism. A new version of the Günther Tulip filter, the Celect IVC filter was introduced in April 2007. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports commenting on Celect IVC filter fracture and fragment embolization to liver. We report a case in which the strut of the Celect IVC filter embolized to the liver.

Purpose To evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion in patients with underlying deep vein thrombosis for prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism, based on a single center experience. Materials and Methods A total of 166 IVC filter insertion procedures in 160 patients, between February 2004 and December 2014, were retrospectively reviewed. Severity of deep vein thrombosis, indwelling time of the IVC filter, retrieval rate, and complication rate depending on the type of IVC filter were analyzed based on the patients' radiologic findings and medical records. Results IVC filter insertion procedures were successfully performed in all patients. Among the 99 attempts at filter retrieval, 91 trials succeeded (91.9%, 91/99) and 8 trials failed. Indwelling time of the IVC filter showed a positive correlation with failure of filter retrieval (p = 0.01). There was no procedure-related complication after all IVC filter insertion procedures. Eight delayed complications (5.0%, 8/160 patients with IVC filter insertion) were observed [caval thrombosis below the IVC filter (n = 7) and IVC penetration (n = 1)]. Günther Tulip filter was associated with a significant incidence of complication (p = 0.036). Conclusion IVC filter insertion in patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis for prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism can be regarded as a safe treatment modality with an acceptable complication rate.

A 20-year-old man presented with a femur fracture and epidural hemorrhage (EDH) following a fall. One month after fracture surgery, swelling developed in both legs, and he was diagnosed as having a deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A retrievable inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) was inserted, because EDH is a contraindication to anticoagulants. Four months later, he complained of abdominal pain, and a computed tomography scan showed a fractured IVCF strut. After percutaneous removal failed 3 times, the IVCF was surgically removed by orthopedists using a portable image intensifier without cardiopulmonary bypass.

For patients with existing venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), anticoagulation remains the standard of care recommended across multiple professional organizations. However, for patients who developed a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or a pulmonary embolism and cannot tolerate anticoagulation, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters must be considered among other alternative treatments. Although placement of a filter is considered a low-risk intervention, there are important factors and techniques that surgeons and interventionalists should be aware of and prepared to discuss. This overview covers the basics regarding the history of filters, indications for placement, associated risks, and techniques for difficult removal., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).)

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are considered when patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) develop a contraindication to anticoagulation. Use of IVC filters is increasing, despite associated complications and lack of data on efficacy in reducing VTE-related mortality. We characterized the pattern of IVC filter use at a large community hospital between 2018 and 2022. Specifically, we assessed the indications for IVC filter insertion, filter removal rates, and filter-associated complications. Indications for IVC filters were compared to those outlined by current clinical practice guidelines. We reviewed 120 consecutive filter placement events. The most common indications included recent VTE and active bleeding (40.0%) or need for anticoagulation interruption for surgery (25.8%). Approximately one-third (30.0%) of IVC filters were inserted for indications either not supported or addressed by guidelines. Half (50.0%) of patients had successful removal of their IVC filter. At least 13 patients (10.8%) experienced a filter-related complication. In a large community-based practice, nearly one-third of IVC filters were inserted for indications not universally supported by current practice guidelines. Moreover, most IVC filters were not removed, raising the risk of filter-associated complications, and supporting the need for development of comprehensive guidelines addressing use of IVC filters, and post-insertion monitoring practices., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between prophylactic inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implantation and in-hospital deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and mortality among adults with intracranial, pelvic or lower extremity, and spinal cord injuries., Methods: Patients 18 years and older with severe intracranial, pelvic or lower extremity, or spinal cord injuries captured by the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2019) were identified. IVCFs implanted ≤72 hours after hospital presentation and before performance of lower extremity ultrasonography were defined as prophylactic. Patients were stratified by pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis status. Logistic regression models estimated prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filtration's effect on selected outcomes and identified attributes associated with prophylactic IVCF implantation., Results: Of 544,739 included patients, 1.3% (n = 7,247) underwent prophylactic IVCF implantation. Among patients who received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, prophylactic IVC filtration compared with expectant management was positively associated with DVT (odds ratio [OR], 4.30; P < .001) and PE (OR, 4.30; P < .001) but not associated with mortality (OR, 0.92; P = .43). Among patients who received no pharmacologic prophylaxis, prophylactic IVC filtration was positively associated with DVT (OR, 4.63; P < .001) and PE (OR, 5.02; P < .001) but negatively associated with mortality (OR, 0.43; P < .001)., Conclusions: Prophylactic IVC filtration was associated with increased likelihood of VTE among all adults with severe intracranial, pelvic or lower extremity, and spinal cord injuries. In patients who received no pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, prophylactic IVC filtration was associated with decreased likelihood of in-hospital mortality., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To characterize the medical supply costs associated with inferior vena cava filter retrieval (IVCFR) using endobronchial forceps (EFs), a snare, or Recovery Cone (RC)., Materials and Methods: In total, 594 of 845 IVCFRs attempted at a tertiary referral hospital between October 1, 2012, and June 20, 2022 were categorized by intended retrieval strategy informed by, rotational cavography as follows: (a) EF (n = 312) for tilted or tip-embedded/strut-embedded filters and for long-dwelling closed-cell filters and (b) a snare (n = 255) or (c) RC (n = 27) for other well-positioned filters with or mostly without hooks, respectively. List prices of relevant supplies at time of retrieval were obtained or, rarely, estimated using a standard procedure. Contrast use, fluoroscopic time, filter type, dwell time, and patient age and sex were recorded. Mean between-group cost differences were estimated by linear regression, adjusting for date. Additional models evaluated filter type, dwell time, and patient-level effects., Results: Of the 594 IVCFRs, 591 were successful, whereas 2 EF and 1 snare retrievals failed. Moreover, 4 EF retrievals were successful with a snare and 2 with smaller EF, 12 snare retrievals were successful with EF, 1 RC retrieval was successful with a snare and 2 with EF. Principal model indicated a significantly lower mean cost of EF ($564.70, SE ± 9.75) than that of snare ($811.29, SE ± 10.83; P < .0001) and RC ($1,465.48, SE ± 47.12; P < .0001) retrievals. Adjusted models yielded consistent results. Had all retrievals been attempted with EF, estimated undiscounted full-period supplies savings would be $87,201.51., Conclusions: EFs are affordable for complex IVCFR, and extending their use to routine IVCFR could lead to considerable cost savings., (Copyright © 2023 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the impact of a commercial tracking database on inferior vena cava filter retrievals with that of physician tracking and no tracking., Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2021, 532 filters were placed at a single institution and followed in 3 phases: (a) Phase 1, pretracking (January 1, 2013, to February 28, 2015); (b) Phase 2, commercial database tracking (March 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019); and (c) Phase 3, commercial database tracking with separate tracking by an interventional radiologist (July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021). Patients excluded from the commercial database due to human error served as a control group. Outcomes of commercial database entry, 2-year filter retrieval rates, dwell times, and factors contributing to retrieval candidacy were collected., Results: Two-year retrieval rates in Phases 1, 2 and 3 were 20%, 31%, and 46%, respectively (Phase 1 vs 2, P = .04; Phase 2 vs 3, P = .009). Median dwell times across Phases 1, 2, and 3 were 168 days (4-1,313 days), 140 days (3-1,988 days), and 188 days (13-734 days) (P = .33), respectively. There was no difference in retrieval rates (P = .86) and dwell times (P = .50) between patients enrolled in the database group and those enrolled in the control group. Across all phases, 48% of patients enrolled in the database were not successfully contacted, and only 6% were categorized as "likely to consult" filter retrieval. During Phase 3, 100% of patients achieved a retrieval disposition., Conclusions: A commercial tracking database had low success rates of contacting patients and did not increase filter retrieval rates relative to those in the control group; however, physician tracking increased retrieval rates., (Copyright © 2023 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction and Importance: Infections of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are rare. The authors present a case of IVC filter infection following concurrent emphysematous urinary tract infections that was finally treated with prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy (PSAT)., Case Presentation: A 68-year-old man with pemphigoid and type 2 diabetes mellitus, who had undergone IVC filter placement, was transferred with decreased consciousness, respiratory failure, and hypotension. Computed tomography revealed gas in the left renal parenchyma and bladder wall, suggesting a diagnosis of concurrent emphysematous pyelonephritis and cystitis. While blood and urine cultures were positive for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli , and the patient's general condition improved with proper antibiotic therapy, bacteremia persisted until day 10 from symptom onset. After ruling out abscesses and infectious endocarditis, the cause of persistent bacteremia was suspected to be IVC filter infection. As the IVC had been placed 12 years before, the authors did not remove it to avoid complications. PSAT with sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim was continued after 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic therapy. The patient had an uneventful course over the year following hospital discharge., Clinical Discussion: PSAT is considered for device-related infections in patients with cardiac assist devices and artificial joints when the infection flares up or recurs even after antibiotic treatment of an adequate duration. There is no consensus regarding the optimal duration of antimicrobial therapy for IVC filter infections., Conclusion: Infections of implanted devices, such as IVC filters, secondary to severe infections can cause persistent bacteremia. PSAT may be an alternative option to treat IVC filter infection, when the IVC filter is considered difficult to remove., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to help guide inferior vena cava (IVC) filter choices by better understanding the retrieval characteristics, complications, and total costs between two commonly used IVC filters., Methods: All patients who underwent retrieval or attempted retrieval of Denali (Bard Peripheral Vascular) or Option (Argon Medical Devices) IVC filters were identified between March 2016 and October 2021 at a single tertiary care center. Those with imaging studies that permitted evaluation of filter placement, presence or degree of tilt, and/or hooking of the filter into the IVC wall were included in the present study. Filter retrieval success, number of attempts, use of advanced techniques, and fluoroscopy and procedural times were recorded and compared between the two filters., Results: A total of 87 patients presented for retrieval of 52 Denali and 35 Option Elite filters during the study period. Denali filters were more likely to be successfully retrieved at the first attempt (94% vs 77%; P = .019). The procedural and fluoroscopy times were shorter for Denali filters (29 minutes vs 63 minutes [P < .001] and 7 minutes vs 25 minutes [P < .001], respectively). Denali filters were less likely to be significantly tilted (≥15 ○ ) at retrieval (12% vs 29%; P < .001) or to have the filter hook embedded in the IVC wall (6% vs 40%; P < .001). Tilting of the filter of ≥15 ○ had no significant effects on the retrieval success rate (no tilt or tilt <15 ○ vs tilt of ≥15 ○ : 98% vs 100%; P = .58). In contrast, filter hook penetration into the IVC wall significantly reduced successful recovery (41% vs 99%; P < .001)., Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that although the filter designs are similar, a benefit exists in the ease of retrievability of the Denali over the Option filter. We found that tilting and hooking of the filter in the IVC wall occurred significantly more with the Option filter. These factors likely made retrieval more difficult and contributed to the longer procedure and fluoroscopy times., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introductio. The Angel® catheter (BiO2 Medical Inc, San Antonio, Texas, USA) is a novel device that combines a triple lumen central venous catheter with an inferior vena cava filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism (IVC filtercatheter). Case report. We present the case of a 53- yearold male patient with renal carcinoma and a history of recent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on oral anticoagulation who was scheduled to undergo open radical nephrectomy. Because of concerns about the risks from documented pre-existing DVT, we decided to insert the Angel® catheter preoperatively in order to have central venous access during surgery and also to reduce the risk of perioperative pulmonary embolism. On the first postoperative day, active gastric bleeding was detected and nadroparine was stopped. Before removal of the Angel® catheter, a pre-removal cavagram revealed large thrombus mass in the catheter filter. Because of the presence of the thrombus mass, the catheter was removed surgically, after a permanent vena cava filter was inserted. Conclusion. This case suggests that the use of the Angel® IVC filter/3-lumen central catheter combination could be a reasonable option for pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in the patients at a high risk for DVT, such as the patients with malignant disease, paraneoplastic syndrome and chemotherapy who need to undergo surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate factors associated with increased fluoroscopy time or the need for complex techniques at IVC filter retrieval.Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of 187 consecutive patients who underwent IVC filter retrieval. An analysis was performed on associations of patient factors with increased fluoroscopy time and/or the need for complex retrieval techniques. A complex retrieval was defined as one requiring more than standard sheath and snare technique.Results: Access vein during filter placement was not associated with filter tilt at placement or removal (p = 0.61 and 0.48). Neither the direction of the hook nor its relationship to the tilt was associated with the need for complex retrieval or increased retrieval fluoroscopy time (p = 0.25, 0.23, p = 0.18, 0.23). Tilt angle at placement correlated with hook apposition at time of removal (p = 0.01). Hook apposition was associated with complex retrieval and increased fluoroscopy time (p < 0.01). Larger tilt angle at placement was not associated with complex retrieval (p = 0.22), but a larger angle at removal was (p < 0.01). Longer dwell time correlated with the need for complex retrieval (p = 0.02). Filter type, sex, and age were not associated with complex retrievals (p = 0.58, p = 0.90, p = 0.99).Conclusion: Contrary to previous hypotheses and studies, access vein for filter placement did not affect filter tilting, and direction of filter hook-tilt relationship did not affect retrieval fluoroscopy time or the need for complex retrieval techniques. Increased filter placement angle was associated with a larger angle at removal and hook-wall apposition, both of which were associated with complex retrievals.Key Points: • Filter hook orientation did not correlate with retrieval complexity. • Filter insertion vein did not correlate with filter tilt. • Filter tilt and hook apposition to the caval wall at the time of retrieval correlated with retrieval procedure complexity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venous thromboembolism is a frequent complication of gynecologic cancer, and may be the first symptom of occult malignant disease. Although anticoagulation therapy remains the standard of care in patients presenting with acute venous thromboembolism, inferior vena cava filters are an important alternative when anticoagulants are contraindicated or ineff ective. We report a case of a 69-year-old women who presented with left leg swelling secondary to deep venous thrombosis before the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Th e aim of this study is to review the respective literature and report our experience with inferior vena cava fi lter placement to prevent pulmonary embolism in gynecologic cancer patients.

Background: To assess the characteristics of Option and Denali filters and to identify associations between these characteristics in each filter type., Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent Option or Denali filter placement between August 2019 and August 2022 were included in this retrospective study., Results: A total of 119 patients (Option, n = 60; Denali, n = 59) were included. The retrieval rates were 45.0% for Option filters and 40.7% for Denali filters. The incidence of tilt at placement was higher for Option filters (76.7%) than for Denali filters (11.9%; P < 0.001). The tilt angle of Option filters at placement was correlated with the common iliac vein-inferior vena cava (CIV-IVC) angle. The incidence of tilt angle change after placement was higher for Option filters (74.1%) than for Denali filters (8.3%; P = 0.001). The IVC contraction rate after retrieval of Option is less than Denali (22.2% vs. 87.5%, P < 0.001). The median fluoroscopy time during Option filter retrieval was longer than during Denali filter retrieval. The fluoroscopic time was related to tilt angle during retrieval of Option filters., Conclusions: Option filters are more likely than Denali filters to tilt at placement, and the tilt angle of Option filters is more prone to change after placement. The tilt angle at placement in Option filters is related to the CIV-IVC angle. Option filters require a longer fluoroscopic time during retrieval than Denali filters, and this increased fluoroscopic time is related to the tilt angle. Denali is more likely to cause IVC constriction after placement., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore the risk factors for inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) thrombus in orthopedic trauma patients who underwent filter placement with ongoing anticoagulation in clinical settings., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from fracture patients with lower extremity acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) implanted with an IVCF admitted to Tianjin Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. Potential risk factors, such as gender, age, diabetes, hypertension, fracture sites, thrombus location, free-floating thrombus, filter type, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and postoperative D-dimer values, were analyzed by the Chi-square test, t-test, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis., Results: A total of 662 patients were included in our study, and filter-related thrombosis was present in 67 (10.1%) patients. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, fracture site, free-floating thrombus, filter type, indwelling time, and postoperative D-dimer level. Thrombus location and ISS were significantly different ( p < 0.05). Popliteal DVT (P-DVT) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.130, p = 0.018) and ISS (OR: 1.135, p = 0.000) were associated with filter thrombus. Patients with P-DVT were prone to a small filter thrombus (OR: 3.231, p = 0.037). From the ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic value of ISS was 24.5 and 26.5 for patients with filter and massive filter thrombus, respectively., Conclusion: Thrombus location and ISS were independent risk factors for filter thrombus in patients with traumatic fractures. P-DVT had a higher potential to result in a small filter thrombus and an ISS value >26.5, which was considered a significant massive filter thrombus predictor., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: To improve radiopacity of radiolucent absorbable poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) and demostrate their effectiveness in clot-trapping ability., Materials and Methods: Tungsten nanoparticles (WNPs) were incorporated along with polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) polymers to increase the surface adsorption of WNPs. The physicochemical and in vitro and in vivo imaging properties of PPDO IVCFs with WNPs with single-polymer PHB (W-P) were compared with those of WNPs with polymer blends consisting of PHB, PCL, and PVP (W-PB)., Results: In vitro analyses using PPDO sutures showed enhanced radiopacity with either W-P or W-PB coating, without compromising the inherent physicomechanical properties of the PPDO sutures. W-P- and W-PB-coated IVCFs were deployed successfully into the inferior vena cava of pig models with monitoring by fluoroscopy. At the time of deployment, W-PB-coated IVCFs showed a 2-fold increase in radiopacity compared to W-P-coated IVCFs. Longitudinal monitoring of in vivo IVCFs over a 12-week period showed a drastic decrease in radiopacity at Week 3 for both filters., Conclusions: The results highlight the utility of nanoparticles (NPs) and polymers for enhancing radiopacity of medical devices. Different methods of incorporating NPs and polymers can still be explored to improve the effectiveness, safety, and quality of absorbable IVCFs., (Copyright © 2023 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implantation., Method: This retrospective analysis includes data from 100 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who underwent IVC filter implantation due to a free-floating thrombus (n = 64), thrombus propagation (n = 8), or acute bleeding (n = 8) on therapeutic anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis (n = 8), or had previously implanted filter with DVT recurrence. Patients were treated with warfarin (n = 41) or rivaroxaban (n = 59) for 3-12 months. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding events were assessed at 12 months follow-up., Results: Three (7.3%) cases of VTE recurrence without IVC filter occlusion occurred on warfarin and none on rivaroxaban. The only (2.4%) major bleeding occurred on warfarin. Three (5.1%) clinically relevant non-major bleedings were detected on rivaroxaban. No significant differences existed between groups when full and propensity scores matched datasets were compared., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban seems not less effective and safe than warfarin after IVC filter implantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Inferior vena cava filters (VCFs) are a therapeutic resource for the treatment of patients with thromboembolic disease who have a contraindication to full-dose anticoagulation. In the present study, we report the retrieval rate and long-term mortality of patients receiving optional inferior VCFs and identify the predictors for retrieval and all-cause mortality during follow-up., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 739 consecutive recipients of optional inferior VCFs from January 2002 to December 2021 in two hospitals. Different clinical characteristics and procedure-related variables were included in the analysis. The all-cause mortality rate and retrieval rate and the predictive factors were evaluated using multivariate analysis., Results: Of the 739 patients, 393 (53%) were women. The mean patient age was 69 ± 15 years. Of the patients, 67% presented with pulmonary thromboembolism and 43% with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A contraindication to anticoagulation was present for nearly 90% of the patients, mainly (47%) related to the surgical procedure. In addition, 44% of the patients had active cancer. Follow-up data were available for 94% of the patients, with an average follow-up time of 6.08 ± 5.83 years. Long-term mortality was 53%. Cancer (odds ratio [OR], 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-5.83), age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.08-1.42), and DVT (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.08-1.42) were identified as independent predictors of mortality. The retrieval rate at follow-up was 33%. The predictors for retrieval included the indication of the filter related to a surgical procedure (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 2.54-9.59), the absence of cancer (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.45-5.75), and younger age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99)., Conclusions: High long-term mortality was observed. The predictors of mortality were cancer, older age, and DVT. One third of the filters implanted were retrieved. The predictors for retrieval were a contraindication to surgery-related anticoagulation, the absence of cancer, and younger age., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)