51. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines
- Author
-
Hormuzd A. Katki, Maria Demarco, Richard S. Guido, Amy Wiser, Xiaojian Chen, Didem Egemen, Li C. Cheung, Nicolas Wentzensen, Mark Schiffman, and Rebecca B. Perkins
- Subjects
HPV ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Consensus ,Risk Based Guidelines ,Cervical precancer ,MEDLINE ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,Risk profile ,California ,03 medical and health sciences ,External data ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,cervix ,risk estimation ,Humans ,Medicine ,Papillomaviridae ,Cervix ,Early Detection of Cancer ,validation ,Vaginal Smears ,Estimation ,Risk Management ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,Cervical screening ,business.industry ,screening ,risk-based management ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,General Medicine ,portability ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cytology test ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Family medicine ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,ComputingMethodologies_DOCUMENTANDTEXTPROCESSING ,Female ,business ,Precancerous Conditions - Abstract
Supplemental digital content is available in the text., Objective To manage cervical screening abnormalities, the 2019 ASCCP management consensus guidelines will recommend clinical action on the basis of risk of cervical precancer and cancer. This article details the methods used to estimate risk, to determine the risk-based management, and to validate that the risk-based recommendations are of general use in different settings. Methods Based on 1.5 million patients undergoing triennial cervical screening by cotesting at the Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2017, we estimated risk profiles for different clinical scenarios and combinations of past and current human papillomavirus and cytology test results. We validated the recommended management by comparing with the estimated risks in several external data sources. Results Risk and management tables are presented separately by Egemen et al.1 and Demarco et al.2 Risk-based management derived from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California largely agreed with the management implied from the estimated risks of the other data sources. Conclusions The new risk-based guidelines present management of abnormal cervical screening results. By describing the steps used to develop these guidelines, the methods presented in this article can provide a basis for future extensions of the risk-based guidelines.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF