51. Retrospective evaluation of vehicle whiplash-reducing head restraint systems to prevent whiplash injury in Victoria, Australia
- Author
-
Stuart Newstead and Angelo Dominic D'Elia
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Victoria ,Human Factors and Ergonomics ,Crash ,Insurance claims ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,0502 economics and business ,medicine ,Whiplash ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Crash data ,Head restraint ,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ,Whiplash Injuries ,050107 human factors ,Retrospective Studies ,Sweden ,050210 logistics & transportation ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Accidents, Traffic ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,medicine.disease ,Whiplash injury ,Front seat passenger ,business ,human activities - Abstract
Head restraint systems specifically engineered to reduce the impact of whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision were introduced in the late 1990s with the aim of reducing whiplash injury risk that went 'beyond simple geometric improvements' to head restraints. Whilst studies have shown that whiplash-reducing head restraint systems are highly effective in reducing whiplash injury, these were based on a limited range of systems including Toyota's Whiplash Injury Lessening (WIL) seating system, Volvo's Whiplash Injury Prevention System (WHIPS) and the Saab Active Head Restraint (SAHR) and have generally focussed on Swedish crash and insurance data. However, there has been no broad real-world crash-based evaluation of the effectiveness of whiplash-reducing head restraint systems currently present in the vehicle fleet that validates the results of these studies in other populations. The objective of this study was to undertake a retrospective evaluation of vehicle whiplash-reducing head restraint systems to prevent whiplash injury using real-world crash data linked to insurance claims data in Victoria, Australia. It was found that whiplash-reducing head restraint systems are associated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds of driver and front seat passenger whiplash injury in a vehicle struck in a rear-end collision of 11.6 % (95 % CI 0.20 %, 21.6 %). The results indicate that whiplash-reducing head restraint systems are an effective technology for reducing the risk of whiplash injury to drivers and front seat passengers in a vehicle struck in a rear-end collision. Considering that around a quarter of all casualty crashes involving passenger and light commercial vehicles are rear-end, the fitment of whiplash-reducing head restraint systems to all vehicles as a standard safety feature would likely see a significant reduction in the incidence of whiplash injury.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF