Search

It is important to distinguish ALK positive lung cancer from ALK negative lung cancer and to monitor the efficacy of targeted drugs. This paper applies a microscopic hyperspectral imaging technique to identify ALK positive lung cancer cells and evaluate the therapeutic effect. The hyperspectral images of five groups of lung tissues are captured by the home-made microscopic hyperspectral imaging system. A preprocessing algorithm is proposed to reduce obvious banding noise and noise particles from original data. Then a segmentation algorithm, which assembles Supported Vector Machine (SVM) and Majority analysis together with the Clumping processing, is presented. The ALK positive and negative lung cancers can be distinguished by both the fluctuation of spectral curves and the relative proportion between cytoplasm and cell nucleus. In addition, the treatment efficacy can be surveyed in the same way. The experimental results show that the relative proportion of cytoplasm in Group ALK-neg is 77.3%, while that in Group ALK-pos is 40.6%. It is obvious that there exist differences in contents and spectra between Group ALK-neg and Group ALK-pos. Moreover, the experimental results of quantitative analysis and spectral curves analysis show that ALK positive lung cancer cells treated with the low concentration of targeted drugs will be developed towards the ALK negative lung cancer. This paper shows the potential of using hyperspectral images to detect the ALK positive lung cancer cells and evaluate the therapeutic effect of targeted drugs.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are characterized by unfavorable prognosis and poorer survival in comparison with B-cell lymphomas. Probability of remission on first-line PTCL therapy is not higher than 60 % with high relapse rate. Longterm remission in PTCL relapses/progression cases typically fails to be achieved. The present article provides literature review and the authors’ own clinical experience in the management of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, ALK-positive with primary skin and soft tissue lesions in an 65-year old female patient. After NHL-BFM-90 intensive chemotherapy the first 5,5-year complete remission was achieved in this patient. Afterwards a СНОР therapy-resistant relapse was identified. Chemotherapy-resistance of tumor was successfully overcome by adding of epigenetic drugs to cytostatic antitumor therapy. The duration of second complete remission is 3 years. Oncohematological diseases with either initial chemotherapy-resistance or the resistance acquired during antitumor therapy are most efficiently treated by various drug combinations including monoclonal antibodies, epigenetic drugs, and cytostatic therapy.

Objective Crizotinib is recommended as the first-line therapy for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite its initial efficacy, patients ultimately acquire resistance to crizotinib within 1 year. In such patients, the optimal sequential therapy after crizotinib treatment remains unknown. This study explored which sequential therapy option confers the greatest benefit. Methods A total of 138 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC resistant to crizotinib were studied. Based on patterns of disease progression of metastases, patients were divided into 3 groups: brain progression, non-liver progression, and liver progression. Sequential therapies included crizotinib continuation plus local therapy, next-generation ALK inhibitors (ALKi's), and chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the time of crizotinib resistance to death or last follow-up. Results The 138 patients included 64 cases with progression in brain, 57 cases in non-liver sites and 17 cases in liver. A significant difference in OS was observed among the distinct progression pattern (median OS, 25.4 months in brain, 15.8 months in non-liver, and 10.8 months in liver, respectively, P=0.020). The difference in OS among sequential therapies was statistically significant in the non-liver progression group (median OS, 27.6 months with next-generation ALKi's, 13.3 months with crizotinib continuation, and 10.8 months with chemotherapy, respectively, P=0.019). However, crizotinib continuation plus local therapy seems to provide non-inferior median OS compared with next-generation ALKi's for patients with brain progression (median OS, 28.9 months vs. 32.8 months, P=0.204). And no significant differences in OS were found in patients with progression in liver (P=0.061). Conclusions Crizotinib continuation together with local therapy might be a feasible strategy for patients with progression in brain beyond crizotinib resistance, as well as next-generation ALKi's. Next-generation ALKi's tended to provide a survival benefit in patients with non-liver progression.

Multiple lines of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended for the treatment of ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). This article provides an unusual case report of a 33-year-old male patient with a 91-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) on a first-generation TKI, crizotinib.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are drivers of a subset of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rapid progression of ALK inhibitors has significantly prolonged the progression‐free survival of patients with ALK gene‐sensitive mutations. However, the response of patients with rare ALK rearrangements to tyrosine kinase inhibitors remains unknown. Here, we report a rare case of striatin (STRN)‐ALK‐positive NSCLC showing primary resistance to first‐line therapy alectinib and limited clinical activity of crizotinib in the alectinib‐resistant setting., Here, we report a rare case of striatin (STRN)‐ALK‐positive NSCLC responding to crizotinib after the failure of alectinib. Our study highlights the heterogeneity in response of STRN‐ALK fusion to targeted drugs and provides clinical evidence of STRN‐ALK fusion responding to crizotinib.

Advances in chromosomally rearranged ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer have been dramatic in only the last few years. Survival times have improved dramatically due to the introduction of ever more efficacious ALK inhibitors. These improvements have been due largely to improvements in blood-brain barrier penetration and the breadth of ligand binding pocket mutations against which the drugs are effective. However, the advances maybe slow due to the frequency of cancers with compound resistance mutations are appearing, suggesting the need to develop multiple ALK inhibitors to target different compound mutations.Another research area that promises to provide further gains is the use of drug combinations, with an ALK inhibitor combined with a drug targeting a “second driver” to overcome resistance. In this review, the range of secondary targets for ALK+ lung cancer and the potential for their clinical success are reviewed.

Introduction/Objective ALK-positive histiocytosis is a recently described entity which occurs in both children and adults and can present with localized or disseminated disease. Limited case reports and series describe histiocytic infiltrates with irregular morphologic features and typical immunoreactivity for CD68, CD163, lysozyme, S100(variable), CD4, and cytoplasmic ALK. ALK rearrangements are often confirmed by FISH or molecular sequencing. The presence of such rearrangements may make ALK inhibitor therapy possible, although further investigation is necessary. We report two cases of ALK-positive histiocytosis diagnosed at our institution. Methods/Case Report Patient 1 is a 4-year-old girl with a prior history of high-risk neuroblastoma status-post resection, bone marrow transplant, radiation, and chemotherapy. An MRI performed due to neurologic symptoms revealed a left frontal-enhancing mass. With concern for metastatic neuroblastoma, a biopsy was performed, which showed brain parenchyma infiltrated by large atypical histiocytes with moderate eosinophilic cytoplasm and irregular folded nuclei. The histiocytes stained positive for CD68, lysozyme, Factor XIIIa, CD163, CD4, S100(variable), and cytoplasmic ALK. An ALK rearrangement was confirmed by FISH studies. The patient is reportedly doing well on therapy. Patient 2 is a previously healthy 2-year-old boy with a midline palate lesion. An incisional biopsy revealed a submucosal infiltrate of small lymphocytes and enlarged atypical histiocytes with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and vesicular folded nuclei. Histiocytes stained positive for CD68, CD163, Factor XIIIa, lysozyme, S100(variable), CD4, and cytoplasmic ALK. Given presence of an ALK rearrangement detected by FISH, the patient was started on single agent crizotinib therapy and has responded with near complete resolution. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion ALK-positive histiocytosis is a clinicopathologically distinct entity with predilection for young children and presence of ALK rearrangements which may be amenable to ALK inhibitors, such as crizonitib. We report two additional cases to contribute to the expanding spectrum of this rare and relatively new entity.

Objective To compare the baseline clinical characteristics between patients with ROS1-positive and ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the correlations of these subtypes with the distribution of metastases. Methods We compared the clinical characteristics and imaging features of patients with ROS1-positive and ALK-positive NSCLC using statistical methods. Results Data for 232 patients were analyzed. Compared with ALK-positive NSCLC, ROS1-positive NSCLC was more likely to occur in women (71% vs 53%), and primary lesions ≤3 cm were more common in patients with ROS1-positive compared with ALK-positive NSCLC (58% vs 37%). There was no significant difference in the distribution of metastases between the two groups. Subgroup analysis within the ROS1-positive group showed that, compared with primary lesions >3 cm, primary lesions ≤3 cm were more likely to present as peripheral tumors (72% vs 43%) and more likely to exhibit non-solid density (44% vs 4%). Conclusions Although ROS1-positive and ALK-positive NSCLCs show similar clinical features, the differences may help clinicians to identify patients requiring further genotyping at initial diagnosis.

We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive NSCLC in the ALEX study. A total of 303 treatment-naive patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary end point is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points of interest are objective response rate and duration. Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.56; p < 0.0001) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (n = 61, 20%) (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (n = 39, 13%) (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.6-3.2). Objective response rates were higher with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (90.6% versus 81.4%; stratified OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 0.97-5.07) and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative tumors (96.0% versus 75.0%; OR = 9.29, 95% CI: 1.05-81.88) but not in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors (28.6% versus 44.4%; OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-1.74). Next-generation sequencing was performed in 35 of 39 patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-negative tumors; no ALK fusion was identified in 20 of 35 patients (57.1%) by next-generation sequencing, but 10 of 20 (50.0%) had partial response or stable disease. Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to those of the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib.

Background: Since the discovery of the first case of Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) -positive histiocytosis in 2008, originally described as a systemic, self-limiting disease in infants, the range of ALK-positive histiocytosis has recently been expanded to include localized diseases in older children and young adults. Case presentation: We present the case of an 18-year-old female with periumbilical painless mass for 5 months, who underwent a resection of the mass. Pathological examination showed the tumor consists predominantly of fascicular to storiform growth of nonatypical spindle cells, admixed with lymphocytic infiltrates. The tumor spindle cells were diffusely positive for CD68, CD163 and ALK. Further, molecular tests revealed ALK gene fusion: Kinesin Family Member 5B (KIF5B) (E24)-ALK (E20), confirmed ALK-positive histiocytosis. The tumor has not recurred one and a half years after resection by follow-up examination.Conclusion: ALK-positive histiocytosis in local lesion can achieve remission by complete resection and clinical follow-up showed a favorable prognosis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK) gene are highly sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like alectinib. Here, the case of a 77-year-old male patient with newly diagnosed metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC treated with alectinib has been discussed. The patient achieved a durable (>18 months) complete response and demonstrated excellent clinical tolerance to alectinib.

Background: We aimed to determine whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aids in prognosis of relapse-free survival (RFS). Methods: Non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK mutations were recruited prospectively. CTCs and cfDNA were quantified at different time points. RFS was estimated and correlated. Results: Baseline median CTCs and cfDNA were 16 cells and 57 ng/mL and declined to nine cells and 30 ng/mL, respectively, postsurgery in 150 patients. Interestingly, patients without detectable CTCs postsurgery fared better for RFS. cfDNA monitoring showed deviations within 7 months of surgery that were significant predictors for RFS. Conclusion: Short-term monitoring of CTCs and cfDNA variations shows promise for early risk detection and may aid in better disease control.

Background: Crizotinib and alectinib were the two most commonly used anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared their antitumor efficacies and adverse effects based on a pooled analysis of the ALEX, ALESIA and J-ALEX clinical trials.Methods: Seven databases were searched for eligible articles. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), central nervous system (CNS)-PFS, drug responses and adverse effects (AEs).Results: Three randomized controlled clinical trials (ALEX, ALESIA and J-ALEX) with a total of 7 articles and 697 patients were included. Compared with crizotinib, alectinib exhibited superior efficacy in PFS (HR [hazard ratio]: 0.35, [0.25-0.49], p < 0.00001), OS (HR: 0.66, [0.47-0.92], p = 0.02), CNS-PFS (HR: 0.17, [0.11-0.24], p < 0.00001), duration of response (HR: 0.31, [0.23-0.42], p < 0.00001), objective response rate (ORR) (Risk ratio [RR]: 0.87, [0.80-0.94], p = 0.0003), partial response (PR) (RR: 0.88, [0.81-0.96], p = 0.004), and grade 3-5 AEs (RR: 1.43, [1.09-1.87], p = 0.009). Additionally, the survival advantages of alectinib compared with crizotinib increased with alectinib’s prolongation of survival time. The disease control rate, complete response and total AEs were comparable between the two groups. A greater increase in constipation, nausea, diarrhea, alanine aminotransferase, vomiting, aspartate aminotransferase, peripheral edema, dysgeusia, and visual impairment as well as a greater decrease in appetite and neutrophil count were associated with the crizotinib groupConclusions: In both antitumor efficacy and safety, alectinib appears to be superior to crizotinib for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC.

Introduction Patients with ALK rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) show survival benefits from tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI). Widely application of DNA sequencing revealed various rearrangement pattern in addition to single EML4-ALK fusion. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the distribution and coexistence of ALK rearrangement and therapeutic outcome of patients with ALK rearranged NSCLC. Method ALK positive NSCLC patients were screened at West China Hospital. NGS was performed on pre-treatment samples. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes were collected to retrospectively analyzed. Results Among the 89 patients with 22 ALK rearrangements, fusions of intergenic sequences with ALK were found in 15 (16.85 %). Non-EML4–ALK fusions were present in 18 patients (20.22 %). Coexistence of rearrangements were present in 16 patients (17.98 %). Intergenic sequence–ALK and non-EML4–ALK fusions occurred at higher rates in patients with at least two fusions (62.5 % versus 6.85 % for intergenic sequence–ALK, 62.5 % versus 10.96 % for non-EML4–ALK). There were 40 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients receiving the first-line crizotinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 months when excluding three lost patients. In the seven patients who had at least two fusions, the median PFS was 11.9 months, compared with 9.0 months among those with single (p = 0.336). No significant difference in median PFS was found between patients with and without intergenic-ALK fusion (12.0 months versus 9.6 months, p = 0.989). The median PFS was 9.0 months in patients harboring a single EML4-ALK fusion versus 13.0 months in those with other ALK alterations (P = 0.890). The PFS of patients with single intergenic sequence-ALK fusion reached to 2.9 months, 27 months, and 28.9 months respectively. Conclusion Our study reports the distribution of intergenic sequence–ALK and coexisting fusions in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Intergenic sequence–ALK and non-EML4-ALK are prone to coexist with other fusions. Neither intergenic sequence–ALK nor coexistence of fusions had a significant effect on the therapeutic benefit of treatment with crizotinib.

BackgroundEML4-ALK is a distinct molecular entity that is highly sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not proved efficacy in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer so far. In this study, we performed a mouse clinical trial using EML4-ALK transgenic mice model to comprehensively investigate immunomodulatory effects of ALK TKI and to investigate the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs.MethodsEML4-ALK transgenic mice were randomized to three treatment arms (arm A: antiprogrammed death cell protein-1 (PD-1), arm B: ceritinib, arm C: anti-PD-1 and ceritinib), and tumor response was evaluated using MRI. Progression-free survival and overall survival were measured to compare the efficacy. Flow cytometry, multispectral imaging, whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed from tumors obtained before and after drug resistance.ResultsMouse clinical trial revealed that anti-PD-1 therapy was ineffective, and the efficacy of ceritinib and anti-PD-1 combination was not more effective than ceritinib alone in the first line. Dynamic changes in immune cells and cytokines were observed following each treatment, while changes in T lymphocytes were not prominent. A closer look at the tumor immune microenvironment before and after ceritinib resistance revealed increased regulatory T cells and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing cells both in the tumor and the stroma. Despite the increase of PD-L1 expression, these findings were not accompanied by increased effector T cells which mediate antitumor immune responses.ConclusionsALK-positive tumors progressing on ceritinib is not immunogenic enough to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

It remains unclear how programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression interacts with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, its variants, and the outcome of treatment. One hundred and twenty four out of 1255 patients (9.9%) were deemed ALK-positive by the Ventana IHC assay. PD-L1 status and ALK variants were available in 100 and 59 patients, respectively. PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥ 1%) and strong positive (TPS ≥ 50%) rate was 50% and 16%, respectively. A total of 64 variant types were detected in 59 patients. V1 (32.8%) and V3a/b (28.1%) were the most common variants. There was no significant association between ALK variants and the PD-L1 expression. The presence of V3a/b subtype independently predicted a worse overall survival in patients receiving ALK inhibitor(s) (aHR 5.10 [95% CI 1.22–21.25], P = 0.025) and platinum plus pemetrexed (aHR 9.62 [95% CI 1.90–48.80], P = 0.006). While incorporating ALK variants and PD-L1 expression together, patients with non-V3a/b/positive PD-L1 showed a trend towards longer OS. In conclusion, ALK-positive NSCLC patients possess a high PD-L1 expression rate. Although there was no significant association between PD-L1 expression and ALK variants, the outcome of ALK-positive patients could be sorted by these two biomarkers.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion events account for ~3–7% genetic alterations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we identified the ALK fusion patterns and a novel ALK fusion partner in 44 ALK positive NSCLC patients using a customized HapOncoCDx panel, and identified ALK fusion partners. The most common partner is EML4, forming the variant 1 (v1, E13:A20, 18/44), variant 2 (v2, E20:A20, 5/44), and variant 3 (v3, E6:A20, 13/44). Moreover, we detected a new ALK fusion partner HMBOX1. At the mutation level, TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene (24%), followed by ALK (12%) and STED2 (12%). The median tumor mutation burden (TMB) of these samples is 2.29 mutations/Mb, ranging from 0.76 mut/Mb to 16.79 muts/Mb. We further elaborately portrayed the TP53 mutation sites on the peptide sequence of the encoded protein by lollipop. The mutational signature and copy number alterations (CNAs) of the samples were also analyzed. The CNA events were found in 13 (13/44) patients, and the most commonly amplified genes were MDM2 (n = 4/13) and TERT (n = 4/13). Together, these results may guide personalized clinical management of patients with ALK fusion in the era of precision medicine.

Introduction The treatment landscape for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primarily involves ALK-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a treatment option in NSCLC, the efficacy of ICI is inconclusive in ALK-positive NSCLC as a result of limited data. This retrospective real-world study sought to describe the characteristics of ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with ICI and to assesses treatment outcomes in US oncology practices. Patients and Methods This analysis used the Flatiron Health electronic health record–derived deidentified database and included adult (18 years and older) ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients with receipt of one or more ICIs after January 1, 2015. Median time to ICI discontinuation and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Of 83 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with ICIs, 50.6% (n = 42) received ICI without a prior ALK TKI. Median time to ICI discontinuation was 2.17 months (95% confidence interval, 1.41, 3.32). The median rwPFS was 2.34 months (95% confidence interval, 1.55, 3.09); in patients who received an ICI without prior ALK TKI, it was 3.9 months, and in patients who received ICI therapy after an ALK TKI, it was 1.5 months. Conclusions Real-world effectiveness (rwPFS) of ICIs in ALK-positive NSCLC patients, whether provided before or after TKIs, was limited, underscoring the relative lack of efficacy of ICI in this patient population, particularly compared to approved ALK TKIs.

Introduction Lorlatinib, a next-generation central nervous system–penetrant ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved to treat TKI-refractory ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC based on results from a phase 2 study. Methods A real-world analysis was performed on ALK+ or ROS1-positive (ROS1+) patients with NSCLC enrolled in lorlatinib early or expanded access programs in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and the United States. Results A total of 95 patients with NSCLC (76 ALK+ and 19 ROS1+) were analyzed. Among ALK+ patients treated with less than two previous TKIs, two or more previous TKIs, and three or more previous TKIs, the objective response rates (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 42% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26–59; n = 38) and not reached (NR) (95% CI: 4.5–NR; n = 45), 35% (95% CI: 22–49; n = 55) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 4.5–NR; n = 66), and 18% (95% CI: 4–43; n = 17) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.5–11.6; n = 21), respectively. The ORRs and mPFSs were 13% (95% CI: 0–53; n = 8) and 9.2 months (95% CI: 3.3–NR; n = 9) for patients treated with one second-generation ALK TKI as the only ALK TKI received. For ROS1+ patients, ORRs and mPFSs were 41% (95% CI: 18–67; n = 17) and 11.9 months (95% CI: 6.4–NR; n = 19). The intracranial ORRs were 35% (95% CI: 22–49) and 55% (95% CI: 23–83) for 52 ALK+ and 11 ROS1+ patients. mPFS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 1.0–NR; n = 13) for patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. No new safety signals were noted. Conclusion Lorlatinib exhibited meaningful activity in TKI-refractory ALK+ or ROS1+ patients with NSCLC enrolled in early or expanded access programs.

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation inhibitor of ALK and ROS1 tyrosine kinases with broad coverage of ALK mutations. In a phase 1 study, activity was seen in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, most of whom had CNS metastases and progression after ALK-directed therapy. We aimed to analyse the overall and intracranial antitumour activity of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.In this phase 2 study, patients with histologically or cytologically ALK-positive or ROS1-positive, advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate end-organ function were eligible. Patients were enrolled into six different expansion cohorts (EXP1-6) on the basis of ALK and ROS1 status and previous therapy, and were given lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily continuously in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response by independent central review, assessed in pooled subgroups of ALK-positive patients. Analyses of activity and safety were based on the safety analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib) as assessed by independent central review. Patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline by independent central review were included in the intracranial activity analyses. In this report, we present lorlatinib activity data for the ALK-positive patients (EXP1-5 only), and safety data for all treated patients (EXP1-6). This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01970865.Between Sept 15, 2015, and Oct 3, 2016, 276 patients were enrolled: 30 who were ALK positive and treatment naive (EXP1); 59 who were ALK positive and received previous crizotinib without (n=27; EXP2) or with (n=32; EXP3A) previous chemotherapy; 28 who were ALK positive and received one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with or without chemotherapy (EXP3B); 112 who were ALK positive with two (n=66; EXP4) or three (n=46; EXP5) previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without chemotherapy; and 47 who were ROS1 positive with any previous treatment (EXP6). One patient in EXP4 died before receiving lorlatinib and was excluded from the safety analysis set. In treatment-naive patients (EXP1), an objective response was achieved in 27 (90·0%; 95% CI 73·5-97·9) of 30 patients. Three patients in EXP1 had measurable baseline CNS lesions per independent central review, and objective intracranial responses were observed in two (66·7%; 95% CI 9·4-99·2). In ALK-positive patients with at least one previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP2-5), objective responses were achieved in 93 (47·0%; 39·9-54·2) of 198 patients and objective intracranial response in those with measurable baseline CNS lesions in 51 (63·0%; 51·5-73·4) of 81 patients. Objective response was achieved in 41 (69·5%; 95% CI 56·1-80·8) of 59 patients who had only received previous crizotinib (EXP2-3A), nine (32·1%; 15·9-52·4) of 28 patients with one previous non-crizotinib ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EXP3B), and 43 (38·7%; 29·6-48·5) of 111 patients with two or more previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EXP4-5). Objective intracranial response was achieved in 20 (87·0%; 95% CI 66·4-97·2) of 23 patients with measurable baseline CNS lesions in EXP2-3A, five (55·6%; 21·2-86·3) of nine patients in EXP3B, and 26 (53·1%; 38·3-67·5) of 49 patients in EXP4-5. The most common treatment-related adverse events across all patients were hypercholesterolaemia (224 [81%] of 275 patients overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4) and hypertriglyceridaemia (166 [60%] overall and 43 [16%] grade 3-4). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (7%) of 275 patients and seven patients (3%) permanently discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported.Consistent with its broad ALK mutational coverage and CNS penetration, lorlatinib showed substantial overall and intracranial activity both in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, and in those who had progressed on crizotinib, second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or after up to three previous ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Thus, lorlatinib could represent an effective treatment option for patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in first-line or subsequent therapy.Pfizer.

Background: Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK -positive NSCLC., Methods: The pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model., Results: The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events., Conclusion: Brigatinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK -positive NSCLC, particularly showing robust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient's management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types., Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141)., Competing Interests: Dr. Junling Li has received speaker honorarium for serving on advisory board of Takeda (China) International Trading Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Xing, Hao, Zhang and Li.)

Alectinib can cause rare, but severe hypersensitivity. The cross-reactivity between different ALK inhibitors is unknown and desensitization is the only reported management. We hereby report the first case of severe delayed hypersensitivity developed in a lung cancer patient treated by alectinib, who was successfully managed by switching to brigatinib, another ALK inhibitor. The patient achieved excellent anti-tumor response to brigatinib. Our case provides an alternative and safe strategy in patients with alectinib-related hypersensitivity.

Next-generation ALK TKIs have become the new standard of care in first-line setting in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, sequential strategies at progression are relevant, as may have an impact on patients’ outcome. In this commentary we discuss whether genomic-tailored strategies at progression would be more suitable for improving outcome of ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

Objective: This study describes the real-world characteristics, treatment sequencing, and outcomes among Hispanic patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib. Methods: A retrospective patient review was conducted for several centers in Latin America. Clinicians identified ALK-positive NSCLC patients who received crizotinib and reported their clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were described. A Random Forest Tree (RFT) model was constructed to predict brain progression. Results: A total of 73 patients were included; median age at diagnosis was 58 years, 60.3% were female, and 93.2% had adenocarcinoma. Eighty-nine percent of patients were never smokers/former smokers, 71.1% had ≥2 sites of metastasis, and 20.5% had brain metastases at diagnosis. The median PFS on first-line crizotinib was 7.07 months (95% CI 3.77–12.37) and the overall response rate was 52%. Of those who discontinued crizotinib, 55.9% progressed in the central nervous system (CNS). The RFT model reached a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88% for prediction of CNS progression. Conclusions: The overall response rate and the PFS observed in Hispanic patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line crizotinib were similar to those in previous reports. An RFT model is helpful in predicting CNS progression and can help clinicians tailor treatments in a resource-limited practice.

Background: Alectinib is a new standard treatment for treatment-naïve anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, resistance ultimately develops in almost all patients, and data regarding the efficiency of ceritinib for such patients are insufficient. Patients and Methods: Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated at the Kyoto University Hospital from January 2012 to March 2017 were reviewed. Patients who were treated with ceritinib after alectinib were identified, and the efficacy of ceritinib after alectinib was retrospectively evaluated. Results: There were 35 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, nine of whom received ceritinib after alectinib. The overall response rate to ceritinib was 44%. It was 16% in patients who received ceritinib immediately after alectinib, and 100% in patients who received chemotherapy before ceritinib. The median progression-free survival for patients treated with ceritinib was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval(CI)=1.1-6.5 months). Conclusion: Ceritinib demonstrated a modest clinical benefit after failure of alectinib. Ceritinib may be a reasonable treatment option in this setting.

Objectives Brigatinib is a second-generation ALK inhibitor which demonstrated activity over crizotinib-resistance, especially on brain metastasis by increased blood-brain penetration. However, its activity on lepto-meningeal disease is unknown and scarcely reported. Materials and methods We hereby report the case of lepto-meningeal disease in crizotinib- and ceretinib- treated patient who was successfully treated by brigatinib. Results The patient achieved intracranial response to brigatinib more than 14 months. Conclusion Our case provides additional data on brigatinib’s intracranial activity, not only on brain metastasis but also on leptomeningeal disease, after experiencing resistance to both crizotinib and ceretinib, 1st and 2nd generation ALK inhibitors.