Search

Background: Relapsed and refractory myeloid malignancies including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain a clinical challenge due to high mortality, morbidity, and lack of effective therapeutic agents. PLX2853 is an orally available, non-benzodiazepine bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor that exhibits low nanomolar potency and a modest preference for binding to the second of the double bromodomains of the BET proteins. By regulating genes (e.g., BCL2 and MYC) central to leukemic cell proliferation and survival, PLX2853 has demonstrated broad anti-leukemic activity both as a single agent and in combination with other agents in preclinical models. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in patients with solid tumors revealed high peak plasma concentrations, a short terminal half-life (T 1/2 < 3 hour), and nearly complete elimination from the plasma by 9 hours post dose. This PK profile is hypothesized to improve tolerability by allowing transient target engagement followed by time for recovery after daily dosing. Methods: This is an open-label, Phase 1b dose-escalation study of PLX2853 as a single agent, administered with oral daily dosing for 21-day cycles in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML or high risk MDS. A modified continuous reassessment model with overdose control was used to guide dose escalation decisions and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Primary objectives include safety and PK. Secondary objectives include measures of preliminary efficacy, and exploratory objectives include pharmacodynamic biomarker assessments. Results: Fourteen patients with R/R AML and 8 patients with high risk MDS (median age 69 years, range 47 - 79 years; median number of prior therapies 2, range 1-7) received PLX2853 in escalating doses from 20 to 180 mg QD. Through the data cut-off of 30 Jun 2021 (n=22), the most common treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality occurring in ≥20% of patients (n≥5) are: fatigue (n=14), nausea (n=13), decreased appetite (n=13), anemia (n=10), diarrhea (n=10), vomiting (n=9), hypokalemia (n=9), international normalized ratio increased (n=8), hyperglycemia (n=8), hypophosphatemia (n=8), peripheral edema (n=7), blood bilirubin increased (n=7), dyspnea (n=7), febrile neutropenia (n=6), constipation (n=6), sepsis (n=6), hypoalbuminemia (n=6), hyponatremia (n=6), insomnia (n=6), proteinuria (n=6), and hypertension (n=6). Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at the two highest doses: G3 and G4 hyperbilirubinemia at 180 mg QD and 140 mg QD respectively. The MTD is 140 mg QD and the RP2D, determined on the totality of data in this study and the companion phase 1 study in solid tumors (NCT03297424), is 80 mg QD. The median time to reach maximal PLX2853 plasma concentration (T max) is 1 hour, with no accumulation observed at steady state, consistent with the short T 1/2 (< 3 hours). Dose-dependent increases in exposures were observed across the dose range tested (20-180 mg daily). Fifteen of 22 patients completed at least 1 cycle of treatment. Median duration of treatment was 49 days (range 8 - 232 days). Best Overall Response: 1 patient with a confirmed marrow CR (MDS), 2 x partial remission (1 AML and 1 myeloid sarcoma), 12 x stable disease (7 AML and 5 MDS), 2 x progressive disease (1 AML and 1 MDS), and 5 x not evaluable (4 AML and 1 MDS). Conclusions: Daily dosing of PLX2853 was well tolerated as a monotherapy and showed early signs of clinical activity in some patients with relapsed or refractory AML or high risk MDS, with potential for combination with other agents. The RP2D is 80 mg QD continuous dosing. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03787498. Disclosures Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Solh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Saultz: IKENA: Research Funding. Borate: Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Pemmaraju: CareDx, Inc.: Consultancy; Dan's House of Hope: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexxicon: Other, Research Funding; Samus: Other, Research Funding; HemOnc Times/Oncology Times: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Research Support, Research Funding; Affymetrix: Consultancy, Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Sager Strong Foundation: Other; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy; Springer Science + Business Media: Other; Aptitude Health: Consultancy; MustangBio: Consultancy, Other; Incyte: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Other, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Cellectis S.A. ADR: Other, Research Funding; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; ASH Communications Committee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Clearview Healthcare Partners: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.: Consultancy; ImmunoGen, Inc: Consultancy; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Borthakur: Protagonist: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy. Roboz: Actinium: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Powell: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Matusow: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Halladay: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Vali: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Hope: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Kundu: Daiichi Sankyo: Current Employment. Hsu: Daiichi Sankyo: Current Employment. Watkins: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Zhang: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Walling: Plexxikon Inc.: Consultancy; Aduro Biotech: Consultancy; Ambagon Therapeutics: Consultancy; Arch Oncology: Consultancy; CytomX: Consultancy; Flag Therapeutics: Consultancy; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy; January Therapeutics: Consultancy; Myovant Sciences: Consultancy; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Propella Therapeutics: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; Que Oncology: Consultancy; Shape Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aminex Therapeutics: Consultancy; Proximagen Neurosciences: Consultancy; Sesen Bio: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; TRex BioSciences: Consultancy; Upsher-Smith: Consultancy; Nuvation Bio: Consultancy; Oryzon: Consultancy. Tsiatis: Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. DeZern: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction The FDA has recently approved several oral targeted therapies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). These therapies have been approved in patients with relapsed/refractory disease and as frontline therapy in patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. These agents are also being increasingly utilized as frontline therapy in patients of all ages and fitness levels on clinical trials and through off label prescribing. The decision to use intensive chemotherapy vs targeted therapy is particularly relevant in patients aged 60-75 due to the heterogeneous nature of this population with respect to disease characteristics, performance status, and comorbidities. However, the relative survival impact of intensive chemotherapy vs targeted therapy in this patient population has not been extensively studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare survival outcomes of these treatment approaches and to determine the relative impact of treatment intensity compared to other variables that are known to affect survival in AML patients. Methods In this single-center, retrospective study, patients aged 60-75 diagnosed with AML from 2016-2020 were included if they received treatment with high intensity chemotherapy (HiC), low intensity targeted therapy (LITT), or both during the course of treatment and prior to transplant. HiC was defined as a regimen containing cytarabine + an anthracycline given on a "7+3" based schedule. Patients treated with liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin were excluded. LITT was defined as venetoclax, gilteritinib, enasidenib, or ivosidenib alone or in combination with a hypomethylating agent. Between-group analysis was conducted for patients who had received HiC at any point during treatment (any HiC) vs patients who had not (LITT only). Overall Survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test used for between-group comparisons. Cox regression model was used to associate risk factors with OS. Univariable models were first fit, then a multivariable model was built using backward selection. Transplant status was included as a time-dependent variable. Results A total of 141 patients were included, 80 received any HiC and 61 received LITT only. Compared with the any HiC group, patients in the LITT only group demonstrated older age, a higher percentage of secondary AML, a lower percentage of FLT3 ITD mutations, a higher percentage of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, a lower white blood cell count, and a trend toward higher ELN risk classification at baseline (Table 1). Median OS was significantly longer in the any HiC group (21.8 months vs 13.6 months). A significantly higher percentage of patients receiving any HiC underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but post-transplant OS was not significantly different between the two groups (Table 2). On univariable analysis, receipt of HiC, lower ELN risk classification, and receipt of transplant were all significantly associated with superior OS. Age, performance status, secondary AML, and white blood cell count at diagnosis notably did not have a significant association with OS in this cohort. On multivariable analysis, treatment intensity was no longer found to have an independently significant impact on survival after accounting for ELN risk (hazard ratio (HR) for unfavorable 3.02, p Discussion The results of this study show that baseline disease characteristics and receipt of transplant were the most important predictors of survival in this cohort of AML patients aged 60-75. These factors were notably more impactful than treatment intensity and chronological age. These findings support the use of transplant in this patient population regardless of treatment intensity, especially in those with higher risk disease. Limiting factors in this study include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Ultimately, larger trials with more patients will be needed to confirm these findings including prospective, randomized trials comparing intensive chemotherapy to lower intensity targeted therapy in patients who are transplant-eligible at baseline. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bhatnagar: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Cell Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Blachly: INNATE: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; KITE: Consultancy, Honoraria. Borate: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Mims: Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Walker: Novartis: Other: clinical trial support; Geron: Other: clinical trial support; Newave: Other: clinical trial support.

Introduction: Studies have found that AML pts treated at high pt volume, academic or NCI-designated cancer centers have improved outcomes compared to pts treated at smaller community hospitals. But little is known about the treatment patterns and outcomes as related to a combined academic and community based health system. Therefore, in a real-world cohort that included both academic and community hospitals that collaborate with one another, we evaluated pt characteristics, frequency of genomic testing, frequency of chemotherapy treatment (Tx) or any targeted therapy as a function of age, and outcomes in ND AML pts. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients treated within a comprehensive health system in the Midwest US that includes both metropolitan and rural populations. Pts ≥18 years (yrs) with ND AML between 1 Jan 2011 and 31 Dec 2018 were identified using ICD-9 / ICD-10 codes for AML within the Health System or from one of two local cancer registries, with a follow-up period that ended with the pt's death, 2 years after initial diagnosis or 31 Dec 2018, whichever came first. Date of diagnosis served as the index date. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to visualize overall survival. Results: A total of 629 pts with ND AML were identified in the 3 data sources and included in the cohort for analysis (Figure 1). At the index date, majority (55%) of the pts were older (61 yrs or more), male (55%) and White (89%) (Table 1). Majority of the identified pts (76%) died before the end of the study; higher proportion of older pts died vs younger pts (≥75 yrs: 89%; 61 - 74 yrs: 85% vs. ≤60 yrs: 62%). Most common comorbidities were renal disease (30%), cardiovascular diseases (24%), and diabetes (18%). Of the 500 pts with available cytogenetics data, majority had ELN-defined intermediate risk (49%), then adverse (25%) and favorable (6%); no pt ≥75 yrs had favorable risk profile. Only 82 pts (13%) had evidence of a sequencing genomic report; 78% of the pts had at least 1 mutation and 56% had 2 - 5 mutations (Table 2). By age, pts ≥75 yrs had the highest proportion of multiple (≥3) mutations (46%); most common overall were ASXL1, NPM1, and FLT3. By age, mutations with the highest frequencies were: ≥75 yrs - ASXL1, RUNX1 and TET2; 61 - 74 yrs - ASXL1, NPM1 and TP53; and ≤60 yrs - NPM1, FLT3 and DNMT3A. As expected, pts with TP53 mutations had a lower overall probability of survival vs pts with wild type TP53 or NPM1 mutations (Figure 2). Overall, 69% of pts had records for either standard induction chemotherapy (IC) or other chemotherapy (OC; includes targeted therapy) during the study period; 31% did not have records for chemotherapy (Table 3). Of the 54% of pts with IC, majority (63%) were ≤60 yrs. A higher proportion of pts ≥75 yrs (23%) received OC, which includes hypomethylating agents (HMAs), but 66% of pts ≥75 yrs did not have records for receiving any chemotherapy. Overall probability of survival for pts who received Tx (IC + OC) was higher than for pts who did not receive any Tx (Figure 3). Pts ≥75 years received proportionally more HMAs vs other age groups (Table 3). Anthracyclines and cytarabine records were similar within each age group, suggesting they were given together. In pts with genomic data, 84% received chemotherapy (IC 68%; OC 16%) while 16% did not (Table 4); proportion of pts ≤60 yrs who received IC (91%) was much higher in those with a genomic report than for the entire cohort (75%), and fewer older pts ≥75 yrs with a genomic report did not receive any chemotherapy (31%) vs 66% for the entire cohort. Conclusions: Results of this retrospective study showed 55% of the ND AML pts were >60 yrs, younger pts (≤60 yrs) are more likely to receive IC and 66% of those ≥75 yrs did not receive any chemotherapy or alternative treatment. Additionally, only 13% of pts had evidence of a genomic report although it has been used for prognostication for at least the last decade. With newer Tx options including targeted therapies, access to genomic analysis and Tx needs to increase across all environments (rural and metropolitan) given the impact that such treatments can have on patient outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Borate: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy.

Background: IVO is an oral potent inhibitor of mutated IDH1 (IDH1m) enzyme, recently approved for the treatment (Tx) of ND adult patients (pts) with IDH1m AML ≥75 years old or with comorbidities precluding use of intensive induction chemotherapy, and adult pts with relapsed or refractory AML. In this Phase 2 sub-study of the Beat AML Master Trial, we evaluated the efficacy of IVO + AZA combination Tx in ND pts aged ≥60 years with IDH1m AML (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03013998) Methods: This open-label multicenter (16 sites / 9 enrolling) combination Tx study enrolled ND pts with R132 mIDH1 AML, utilizing the modified minimax Simon's 2-stage Phase 2 design. Pts received IVO + AZA for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or stem cell transplant. Pts who achieved complete remission (CR)/complete remission with hematologic improvement (CRh)/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) continued IVO + AZA for a total of 12 cycles, then IVO monotherapy until PD. Pts without CR/CRh/CRi after 6 cycles continued IVO + AZA if they demonstrated Tx benefit, as defined in Figure 1. Key eligibility included ND IDH1 R132 mutated AML pts aged ≥60 years and ECOG performance status 0 - 2 (Karnofsky ≥60). All pts received IVO 500 mg/day orally in continuous 28-day cycles + AZA 75 mg/m2 IV or SC on days 1-7 every 28 days. The primary endpoint was CR+CRh+CRi rate after 6 cycles of Tx. Response was assessed using modified 2017 ELN AML criteria. The modified minimax Simon's 2-stage design required 40 pts and tested the null hypothesis that the CR/CRh/CRi rate equaled 25% vs the alternative of 50% (one-sided alpha = 0.025, power 90%). Stage 1 required >5/16 responses for continued enrollment. Even though these criteria were met, the sponsor decided to discontinue the trial on 12/12/2019. Here we report the final primary endpoint results. Data were frozen 02/03/2021. Results: Between 07/2018 and 11/2019, 19 patients were enrolled with IDH1m AML; 18 started IVO + AZA Tx and are included in the analyses. At data freeze, 5 pts had died and 7 pts still on Tx were offered standard of care IVO. Median age of the pts was 75 years, 50% were ≥75 years, 61% were female and 89% were White (Table 1). The most common reasons for Tx discontinuation were trial discontinued by sponsor (7 or 39%), stem cell transplant (4 or 22%), and PD (3 or 17%). A total of 13 pts achieved CR/CRh/CRi (72%) by up to 6 cycles of Tx (Table 2 & Figure 2). Over the entire study period, 14 pts achieved CR/CRh/CRi (78%) with 8 CR (44%), 3 CRh (17%) and 3 CRi (17%). No deaths occurred within the first 60 days of Tx. After a median follow up of 19.8 months (mos), Page 2 median response duration was not reached, with 12-mos disease-free survival rate of 69%; also, median OS was not reached, with 12- and 18-mos OS rates of 100% and 73%, respectively. The median (range) time on Tx was 12 mos ( Conclusions: In ND pts with IDH1m AML and ≥60 years of age, IVO + AZA Tx was associated with a high CR/CRh/CRi rate, no early deaths (60 days) and a 1-year OS of 100%. IVO + AZA was acceptably tolerated and no unexpected toxicities occurred. Most common unique toxicities of IVO observed during the study were differentiation syndrome and QTc prolongation; these led to Tx discontinuation in only 1 pt. CR/CRh/CRi rate obtained with IVO +AZA is higher than that previously reported in studies with the individual agents or intensive chemotherapy approaches, suggesting a synergistic effect. Our overall response rate is similar to that reported recently for IVO + AZA in older ND IDH1 mutant AML pts, despite not including pts with morphologic leukemia-free state and partial remission. Based on these results, a global Phase 3 evaluation of IVO or placebo plus AZA is ongoing (NCT03173248). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Patel: BMS-Celgene, Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Peerview: Honoraria. Ruppert: Telios Pharma: Consultancy. Borate: Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Stein: Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; PinotBio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kovacsovics: AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceutials: Honoraria. Blum: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Nkarta: Research Funding; Celyad Oncology: Research Funding; Syndax: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; AmerisourceBergen: Honoraria. Arellano: KITE Pharma, Inc: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Schiller: Sangamo: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bio: Research Funding; Mateon: Research Funding; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Arog: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Regimmune: Research Funding; PrECOG: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Elevate: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Actuate: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Sellas: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Olin: Actinium: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding. Foran: pfizer: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; kura: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; takeda: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; revolution medicine: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria; actinium: Research Funding; aptose: Research Funding; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding. Litzow: Pluristem: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Foster: Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Cogle: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo therapeutics: Research Funding. Vergilio: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Foundation Medicine: Current Employment. Gana: Bausch: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Consultancy. Druker: The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Nemucore Medical Innovations, Inc.: Consultancy; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Iterion Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recludix Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Vincerx Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levine: QIAGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ajax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mission Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zentalis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Auron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: IVO is an oral potent inhibitor of mutated IDH1 enzyme, recently approved for the treatment of ND adult patients with IDH1m AML âââ,¬Â°Ã,Â¥75 years old or with comorbidities precluding use of intensive induction chemotherapy, and adult pts with relapsed or refractory AML. The combination of AZA, a hypomethylating agent, and venetoclax, an oral BCL-2 inhibitor, is also FDA approved for newly diagnosed AML in adults 75 years or older, or who have comorbidities precluding intensive chemotherapy. This presentation will discuss the combination of IVO and AZA.

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Outcome of AML pts is known to be impacted by genetic factors such as cytogenetic abnormalities and gene mutations and sociodemographic factors such as age and race. Neighborhood factors are increasingly recognized as important drivers of disparities in cancer outcomes. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation has been associated with worse survival of numerous cancers, but studies in AML are lacking. Understanding the role of social deprivation in AML outcomes, and its impact in the context of known prognostic factors could identify areas that may benefit from additional health care resources. Methods: We analyzed the clinical and molecular features of 1,242 younger AML (age range, 17-59 y) pts similarly treated with intensive cytarabine/daunorubicin-based chemotherapy on frontline Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology protocols between 2001 and 2013. A neighborhood social deprivation index (SDI) was assigned to all pts based on pt reported zip code of residence. SDI was population weighted with resulting scores (1-100) corresponding to US zip code percentiles of SDI (e.g., 100 = top 1% of US population in zip codes of highest deprivation). We defined 2 SDI levels, low (1-50 n=664) and high (51-100, n=578), that were analyzed for associations with clinical and molecular features and outcomes. Results: Demographic and baseline clinical features did not differ between high and low SDI pts, except for a higher percentage of self-reported non-Hispanic Black pts residing in high compared to low SDI areas (15% v 2%, p Concerning clinical outcomes, there were no significant differences in early death (7% v 6%) or CR (67% for both) rates between low and high SDI pts. However, pts residing in high SDI areas had shorter disease-free survival (DFS; median: 1.3 v 2.4 y, p=.001; Fig. 1A) and overall survival (OS; median: 1.9 v 2.9 y, p We next assessed whether differences in molecular features between high and low SDI groups may help explain the observed survival disparities (n=656 pts). While we found no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of known prognosis-associated gene mutations by SDI levels, there was a trend towards lower frequencies in genes belonging to the cohesion complex and methylation-associated genes (both p=.06), indicating possible differences in underlying disease biology. Percentages of high and low SDI pts did not differ significantly within any of the 3 genetic-risk groups in the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) classification. However, when we analyzed outcomes of pts within the ELN groups, we found that among pts belonging to the ELN Favorable-risk group, high SDI score was associated with shorter OS (p=.03) than low SDI score, but this was not true for ELN Intermediate- or Adverse-risk pts. Lastly, in multivariable analysis for OS in younger AML pts, a high SDI score associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.28, CI: 1.10-1.48, p=.01; Table 1), after correction for ELN groups (p Conclusion: In younger AML pts, residence in areas with high socioeconomic deprivation was associated with poor survival, especially for pts classified in the ELN favorable-risk group. With the exception of patient racial-ethnic identity and receipt of allogeneic transplant in first CR, SDI did not associate with clinical or molecular characteristics. Thus, area social deprivation among younger AML pts should be further investigated to overcome potentially avoidable survival disparities. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882 U24CA196171; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00048958, NCT00899223, NCT00900224; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Blachly: KITE: Consultancy, Honoraria; INNATE: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Blum: Nkarta: Research Funding; Celyad Oncology: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; AmerisourceBergen: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Syndax: Honoraria. Uy: Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy. Stone: Abbvie: Consultancy; Actinium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BerGen Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Elevate Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gemoab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy; Innate: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Consultancy; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntrix/ACI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy. Byrd: Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paskett: Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Eisfeld: Karyopharm (spouse): Current Employment.

Background: GILT is an oral potent selective FLT3 kinase inhibitor approved for marketing for the treatment (Tx) of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory FLT3 mutated (FLT3m) AML but efficacy in older ND FLT3m AML pts is unknown. Furthermore, FLT3m can be present as a dominant or subclone and impact of FLT3 inhibitor therapy in this setting is uncertain. Here we report the results of a Phase 2/1b sub-study of the Beat AML Master Trial to assess the efficacy of GILT monotherapy (GILTm) in ND FLT3m AML pts aged ≥60 years with high and low VAF and the subsequent response-driven addition of DEC Tx. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03013998) Methods: The study was an open-label multicenter (15 sites), 3-outcome, 2-stage Phase 2 design that assigned pts to either Dominant FLT3/Group 1 (GP1) or Non-Dominant FLT3/Group 2 (GP2) as shown in Figure 1. Key eligibility criteria included ND FLT3m AML pts with high and low VAF and/or ITD ratio, aged ≥60 years, and ECOG performance status 0-2. In the Phase 2 study, all pts received GILTm 120 mg/day on days 1 - 28. Pts without CR/CRi after cycle 2 were transferred to the Phase 1b study to receive GILT + DEC (Figure 1). Phase 1b study utilized a standard 3+3 design to evaluate the safety/tolerability of concurrent GILT + DEC. Pts received GILT (dose level 1 [DL1] = 80 mg/day or dose level 2 [DL2] = 120 mg/day on days 1-28) + DEC 20 mg/m 2 IV on days 1-10 or 1-5 every 28 days. Primary endpoint was CR+CRi rate (Phase 2). Response was assessed using modified 2017 ELN AML criteria. The non-dominant GP2 was stopped for futility, GP1 was stopped early to modify trial to include venetoclax. Results: Phase 2 - Between 9/10/2018 to 2/11/2020, 19 / 20 enrolled pts (GP1: n = 9; GP2: n = 10) received GILTm and were included in analyses. Baseline pt characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median (range) time on GILTm was 3 cycles (1 - 18) in GP1 and 1 cycle (1 - 9) in GP2. Most common reasons for discontinuing Tx were Tx failure (TF; 44%) and relapse (33%) in GP1 and TF (70%) and disease progression (PD; 20%) in GP2. Overall CR+CRi was achieved in 4 pts (44%) in GP1 and 1 pt (10%) in GP2. Response duration are shown in Table 2. After median follow-up of 14.3 months (mos) and 19 mos in GP1 and GP2, respectively, 1-year OS was 56% and 76%. Most common Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were febrile neutropenia and colitis (each 25%) in GP1; anemia and low platelet count in GP2 (each 30%). Overall, 7 pts had 15 serious AEs (SAEs) and all SAEs occurred in GP1 pts; most common SAE was colitis (25%) and 1 pt (13%) had a Tx-related Grade 3 SAE of tumor lysis syndrome. In GP2, 1 pt (10%) had Tx-related Grade 2 AE of differentiation syndrome. In GP1, 2 pts died within 60 days of Tx and none in GP2. Phase1b - After up to 2 cycles of GILTm, 12 pts with no CR/CRi (GP1: n = 4; GP2: n = 8) were transferred to receive GILT + DEC (Figure 1). At the time of this report, 1 pt with CRh remained on Tx. Median total time on Tx (including GILTm) was 4 cycles and median time on GILT + DEC Tx was 3 cycles (Table 2). Most common reasons for discontinuing Tx were PD (33%) and TF (25%); and 2 pts (17%) stopped Tx due to an AE. Pts were treated with DL1 GILT + DEC (n = 3), then DL2 GILT + DEC (n = 9); only 1 pt had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at DL2 (Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia and pneumonitis requiring steroid therapy), hence, DL2 GILT + DEC was considered the MTD. CR+CRi rate was 25% in 3 pts, all at DL2 (Table 2). After a median follow-up of 17.8 mos, the 1-year OS from start of GILT + DEC Tx was 57%. Most common Grade ≥3 Tx-related AEs were anemia, febrile neutropenia and low WBC count (each 22%). Overall, 6 pts had 12 SAEs; 1 pt with SAE of Grade 4 sepsis died. Three GILT-related SAEs occurred in 1 pt - Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, and pneumonitis and Grade 1 transaminases increased. One pt died within 30 days and a second within 60 days of Tx. No difference was observed in GILT pharmacokinetics (PK) with or without DEC, however steady state Ctrough values were 1.4 to 2.3-fold greater than in relapsed/refractory AML pts (Admiral trial). Conclusions: In ND pts ≥60 years old with dominant FLT3 AML, GILTm induced a high 44% CR+CRi rate and long median OS (21.7 mos). Pts with non-dominant FLT3 had low 10% CR+CRi rate. GILTm was generally safe and was associated with differentiation syndrome in 1 pt. Concurrent GILT + DEC was acceptably tolerated, only 1 pt had a DLT, and the MTD was 120 mg/day GILT + DEC. A subset of pts with no CR/CRi during GILTm achieved remission with addition of DEC. Based on these results, a triple combination Tx study with venetoclax is currently enrolling. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Traer: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Schrodinger: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier/Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ImmunoGen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mims: Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Xencor: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Stein: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; PinotBio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kovacsovics: AbbVie: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceutials: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Blum: Xencor: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Nkarta: Research Funding; Celyad Oncology: Research Funding; AmerisourceBergen: Honoraria; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Syndax: Honoraria. Arellano: Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; KITE Pharma, Inc: Consultancy. Schiller: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Mateon: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; PrECOG: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding; Actuate: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elevate: Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma: Research Funding; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; Bio: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Sellas: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Olin: Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Actinium: Honoraria. Foran: taiho: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; kura: Research Funding; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; trillium: Research Funding; aptose: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; pfizer: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; actinium: Research Funding; takeda: Research Funding; certara: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; revolution medicine: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding. Litzow: AbbVie: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Pluristem: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Actinium: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Patel: BMS-Celgene, Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Peerview: Honoraria; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Foster: Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Cogle: Aptevo therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vergilio: Foundation Medicine: Current Employment. Gana: The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Bausch: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Druker: VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iterion Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recludix Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Nemucore Medical Innovations, Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Byrd: Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levine: Auron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Ajax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Zentalis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mission Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy; Imago: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; QIAGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Honoraria. Borate: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy.

Background: In vitro studies and emerging clinical data suggest that inhibition of spleen tyrosine kinase may have an antileukemic effect in human AML. Pts with AML and TP53 mutations (TP53m) are commonly associated with older age (≥60 years) and complex karyotype (CK) and respond poorly to standard 7 + 3 induction (IND) chemotherapy with Methods: This multicenter (13 sites), open-label, Phase 2 combination Tx study utilized Simon's 2-stage Phase 2 design and enrolled AML pts with TP53m (identified molecularly) ± CK (Cohort A) or CK (≥3 metaphase abnormalities) without TP53m (Cohort B). Pts initially received 5 days of ENTO lead-in (which was later discontinued), followed by ENTO + DEC and those who achieved CR/CRh/CRi/MLFS with up to 3 cycles of IND proceeded to consolidation (CON) Tx for up to 11 cycles (Figure 1). Pts with CRi/MLFS after IND were allowed up to 6 cycles (IND + CON) to achieve CR/CRh or stayed on Tx if they got clinical benefit or went off Tx. CON was followed by maintenance (MTN) Tx for up to 2 years from start of study Tx. Pts were eligible if aged ≥60 years, ND, and had ECOG performance status 0 - 2. Pts received ENTO 400 mg orally twice daily for 5 days during ENTO lead-in, and then every 28 days during IND, CON, and MTN + DEC 20 mg/m 2 IV days 1-10 (IND) or days 1-5 (CON) every 28 days. Response was assessed using modified 2017 ELN AML criteria. The primary endpoint was composite complete remission (CCR) rate (CR + CRh) with up to 3 cycles of IND, and CRi/MLFS that achieved CR/CRh by up to 6 cycles (IND + CON). Beyond stage 1, pt accrual to Cohort A was allowed based on pts with CRi and to Cohort B was stopped early for futility. Results: Between Oct 2017 and Feb 2020, of the 63 pts enrolled (Cohort A = 48; Cohort B = 15), pts with confirmed eligibility who started study Tx were included in the analyses (Cohort A = 45; Cohort B = 13). During lead-in, 27 pts in Cohort A and 6 pts in Cohort B received ENTOm for 5 days. All pts received ENTO + DEC except 1 pt in Cohort A who withdrew consent (WOC). Median ages of the pts were 70 years (range 60 - 84) in Cohort A and 74 years (range 65 - 86) in Cohort B. Median time (range) on Tx was 2.2 mos and 4.8 mos in Cohort A and B, respectively. Most common reasons for Tx discontinuation were adverse event (AE; 27%), Tx failure (TF; 27%) and WOC (18%) in Cohort A; TF (31%), disease progression and relapse (each 15%) in Cohort B. In each cohort, 1 pt discontinued Tx due to death from leukemia and 1 pt in Cohort A in CRh due to development of an additional genetic abnormality. Four pts (9%) in Cohort A and 1 pt (8%) in Cohort B proceeded to transplant. The CCR (CR + CRh) rates with up to 6 cycles of Tx for Cohort A and B were 13.3% and 30.8%, respectively; overall CR + CRh rates were 17.8% and 38.5% (Table 1). In Cohort A, with a median follow-up of 11.5 months, 0% were 1-year disease-free and median OS (mOS) was 6.5 months. In Cohort B, with a median follow-up of 15.1 months, 25% were 1-year disease-free and mOS was 11.5 months. Deaths within 7-, 30-, and 60-days of Tx were 0, 3 and 11 in Cohort A and 0, 0 and 2 in Cohort B. Most common treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs in Cohort A and B were febrile neutropenia (31% and 39%) and anemia (22% and 31%) (Table 2). Overall, 83 serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 33 pts in Cohort A and 12 SAEs in 6 pts in Cohort B; most common SAEs in Cohort A were pneumonia (18%) and respiratory failure (11%), and in Cohort B sepsis, dehydration and acute kidney injury (each 15%). Most common treatment-related grade ≥3 laboratory abnormalities in Cohort A and B were neutrophils decreased (27% and 31%), WBC count decreased (20% and 23%), and lymphocyte count decreased (18% and 15%). Conclusions: ENTO + DEC demonstrated activity in ND AML pts aged ≥60 years with TP53m ± CK and CK without TP53 but induced low CR/CRh rates and short OS consistent with previously published poor CR rates and OS in these pts. Our results differ from the high remission rate and longer OS previously reported for DEC monotherapy in AML pts with TP53m. ENTO + DEC was safe and acceptably tolerated. Novel Tx strategies that can benefit AML pts with these most adverse risk factors are urgently needed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ruppert: Telios Pharma: Consultancy. Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society's Beat AML clinical study: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Kartos Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Aptevo: Research Funding. Borate: Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rampal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galecto, Inc.: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Stein: Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; PinotBio: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Stock: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; amgen: Honoraria; agios: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; kura: Honoraria; kite: Honoraria; morphosys: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pluristeem: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kovacsovics: AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceutials: Honoraria. Blum: Amerisource Bergen; Abbvie, Syndax: Honoraria; Forma Therapeutics, Xencor; Celyad: Research Funding. Arellano: KITE Pharma, Inc: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Schiller: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Mateon: Research Funding; Actuate: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; PrECOG: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bio: Research Funding; Elevate: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Sellas: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Olin: Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Foran: certara: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; servier: Honoraria; revolution medicine: Honoraria; trillium: Research Funding; takeda: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding. Litzow: AbbVie: Research Funding; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Astellas: Research Funding; Pluristem: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Actinium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Lin: AbbVie, Aptevo Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Bio-Path Holdings, Celgene, Celyad, Genentech-Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Prescient Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Tolero, Trovagene: Research Funding. Cogle: Aptevo therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vergilio: Foundation Medicine: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gana: Bausch: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Consultancy. Druker: The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Recludix Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vincerx Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Iterion Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; Pfizer: Research Funding; Nemucore Medical Innovations, Inc.: Consultancy; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Byrd: Vincerx Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Trillium, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Newave: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levine: Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Zentalis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ajax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Honoraria; Prelude: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Auron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; QIAGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mission Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of entospletinib and decitabine.

Disease relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a major cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Maintenance therapy after HCT for patients with targetable mutations such as mutated IDH1 or IDH2 may improve outcomes, and clinical trials evaluating this strategy are ongoing. However, clinical outcomes of IDH1- and IDH2-mutated AML patients after HCT have not been well described. The primary objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and post-HCT outcomes of IDH-mutated AML patients. Survival outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, 112 adult patients with IDH1- or IDH2-mutated AML who underwent HCT and did not receive an IDH inhibitor as maintenance therapy after HCT were identified at Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Ohio State University. Mutation testing was performed using next-generation sequencing panels. Patient characteristics were collected retrospectively, and their survival outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The median patient age was 64.1 years. The median follow-up was 27.5 months. Among patients, 78.5% had intermediate- or adverse-risk disease by European LeukemiaNET criteria. Fifty-eight percent of patients received intensive induction chemotherapy, 82% of patients underwent HCT during first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and 34% of patients received myeloablative conditioning. Frequently detected co-mutations were DNMT3A (35.7%), NPM1 (33.1%), and FLT3-ITD (13.4%); TP53 mutations were detected in 3.6% of patients. For IDH1-mutated patients transplanted during first CR/CRi, the 1- and 2-year PFS was 75% and 58%, respectively. For IDH2-mutated patients transplanted in first CR/CRi, the 1- and 2-year PFS was 64% and 58%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 31% and 25% for IDH1- and IDH2-mutated cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analysis suggested first CR/CRi and age ≤60 was associated with improved outcomes for IDH2-mutated patients. To date, this is the largest multicenter study of outcomes of IDH-mutated AML patients after HCT. Our analysis provides important benchmarks for analysis and interpretation of results emerging from clinical trials evaluating maintenance IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitor therapy for AML patients after HCT.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most commonly diagnosed acute leukemia in adults. Despite newly approved treatment, AML still results in poor outcomes especially in older patients (pts). Cytogenetic abnormalities, gene mutations, and their combinations contribute to the pathogenesis and pt outcomes in AML. The PTPN11 gene encodes the phosphatase Shp2, which activates the RAS-MAPK pathway. Despite the relatively high frequency of PTPN11 mutations in AML, little is known about associations of PTPN11 mutations with other genomic features and their influence on outcomes of pts with standard 7+3 chemotherapy. In addition, primary resistance to targeted therapy, such as venetoclax and enasidenib, has been preliminarily noted in PTPN11+ pts. This study sought to determine the type and frequency of PTPN11 mutations as well as associations with clinical, cytogenetic, and genomic features and outcome in adult AML pts treated with 7+3 induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trials. 1,725 newly diagnosed AML pts, defined by the European LeukemiaNet 2017 recommendations (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia), were examined using targeted next generation sequencing analysis and centrally reviewed metaphase cytogenetics. Missense, nonsense, or frameshift variants not reported in the 1000 Genomes database, dbSNP137 or dbSNP142, were considered mutations. Fisher's exact test was used to determine mutation association and complete remission (CR) rates while continuous variables are from Wilcoxon rank sum test. The median follow-up was 9 years. We identified 140 pts (8.1%) with PTPN11 mutations with the majority (61%) located in the N-terminal SH2 domain (Figure 1). 98 younger ( 0.3. NPM1 (61% vs 31%, P < .001) and DNMT3A (R882 or other) mutations (39% vs 22%, P < .001) were more likely to co-occur with PTPN11 mutations than wild-type (WT) PTPN11 (Figure 2). PTPN11 mutations were less common in FLT3-ITD pts than in those without (17% vs 25%, P = .07). PTPN11 mutations were more common in inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) pts (26%, P = .004) and were rare in pts with core-binding factor AML, inv(16)/t(16;16) (3%, P = .03) and t(8;21) (0%, P =.005). Clinical features of PTPN11+ pts were similar to those of WT pts except for elevated platelet counts (P < .001) and more extramedullary involvement (P = .03). For all pts, there was no difference in CR rate, disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and event-free (EFS) survival between PTPN11+ and PTPN11- pts. DFS of older PTPN11+ pts was shorter (3-y rates: 5% vs 15%, P = .04). Given that PTPN11 mutations often co-occur with NPM1 mutations, which are typically associated with favorable outcome (in the absence of a high FLT3-ITD ratio), we focused on the contribution of PTPN11 mutations to outcomes in the NPM1+/FLT3-WT subset. Compared with PTPN11-/NPM1+/FLT3-WT, PTPN11+ pts had a lower CR rate (38% vs 64%, P = .001) and shorter EFS (3-y rates: 10% vs 21%, P = .01), whereas there was no significant differences in OS (3-y rates: 23% vs 32%, P = .13) or DFS (3-y rates: 27% vs 33%, P = .75). When considering the role of PTPN11 mutations with WT NPM1, there was a reduction in survival in PTPN11+/NPM1- pts compared with PTPN11-/NPM1- pts. Younger PTPN11+/NPM1- pts had a lower CR rate (45% vs 71%, P = .002) and shorter OS (3-y rates: 30% vs 41%, P = .04), and EFS (3-y rates: 13% vs 27%, P = .008). Compared to older PTPN11-/NPM1-, older PTPN11+/NPM1- pts had a lower CR rate (18% vs 43%, P = .04) and shorter DFS (3-y rates: 0% vs 10%, P = .02) and EFS (3-y rates: 0% vs 4%, P = .02), whereas OS (3-y rates: 12% vs 10%, P = .58) had no significant difference. To our knowledge, this study is the largest cohort of PTPN11+ pts in adult AML and demonstrates specific mutational and cytogenetic associations. When considering PTPN11+ pts based on NPM1 mutation status, we showed that PTPN11 mutations associated with worse outcome in both NPM1+ and NPM1- AML pts when treated with intensive chemotherapy. Developing targeted treatments to this genomic group in AML represents a research priority. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, R35CA198183; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00048958, NCT00899223, NCT00900224 Disclosures Mims: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Blachly:AbbVie, AstraZeneca, KITE Pharma: Consultancy. Stone:Takeda: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Gemoab: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy, Other: Data and safety monitoring board; Arog: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Biolinerx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and safety monitoring board; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Syntrix: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Elevate: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Hoffman LaRoche: Consultancy. Wang:Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy. Kolitz:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magellan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Powell:Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Advisor, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Advisor, Research Funding. Eisfeld:Vigeo Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Byrd:Syndax: Research Funding; Vincera: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Gilead, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Gilead, TG Therapeutics, Novartis, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Janssen, Novartis, Gilead, TG Therapeutics: Other.

Introduction Socioeconomic status has been demonstrated to impact not only medical treatment patients receive, but also outcomes after treatment (Hastert, 2015; Hines, 2014; Kim, 2011; Hackley 2005). Prior studies assert that low income areas include patients with a later cancer stage at diagnosis, an older population, lower income households, a higher percentage of Medicaid population, and lower percentage of residents with a higher education (Hastert, 2015; Bradley, 2002; Lin, 2014). Patients from low income areas may have decreased access to healthcare and limited understanding of cancer treatment options. As a result, there may be differences in their medical treatment (Hines, 2014). The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) demonstrated that the Appalachian population in Ohio, Kentucky and Pennsylvania has a high percentage of poverty and lower education status (Vanderpool, 2019). The Appalachian population has more people living in rural environments, higher levels of obesity, and negative cancer beliefs (Vanderpool, 2019). SEER data combined with CIBMTR data demonstrated that patients from socially disadvantaged areas are referred for transplant less often, and data from Virginia shows a regional variation in referral for SCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Paulson, 2019; Arora, 2018). Our aim in this study was to determine if allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) outcomes differ between Appalachian (AR) and non-Appalachian residents (non-AR). Methods A retrospective review of patient records was conducted for 1168 patients who underwent ASCT from 2008-2018 at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Patients were classified as either AR or non-AR based on zip code according to ARC designation. We compared the clinical and demographic variables between the patients from Appalachian area versus not, using Fisher exact test or chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the continuous variables. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were analyzed using Gray's test and accounting for competing risks, where the competing risks for aGVHD and cGVHD were relapse or death, the competing risk for relapse was death from any cause and the competing risk for NRM was death due to disease. Results Out of the 1168 patients included in our study, 887 (75.94%) were non-Appalachian and 291 (24.91%) were Appalachian residents. There was no significant difference in age (p 0.14) or gender (p 0.54) between the two groups. The non-AR group and AR group did have a statically significant difference (p In both groups, the majority of patients were diagnosed with AML/CMML (42.19% non-AR, 40.55% AR). Other diseases represented included MDS/AA, ALL/PLL, CLL, NHL, CML, HD/HOD, MF, MM; there was no statistical significance with regard to disease distribution between the two populations (p 0.68). Disease related factors including performance status (graded by Karnofsky Score), remission status, comorbidity index, were similar between both groups-as were transplant related factors such as conditioning regimen, donor type, tissue type, CD 34 and CD 3 count (Table 2). BMT related milestones and complications such as days to engraftment, bacteremia, viremia, fungemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, VOD and pulmonary complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (Table 3). Cumulative incidence of those diagnosed with acute and chronic GVHD were not statistically significant between the groups (Graphs 1-2). Outcomes of non-AR and AR groups were compared; results demonstrated that relapse, relapse free survival, overall survival and non-relapse mortality were not statistically significant (Graphs 3-6). Conclusion Our analysis demonstrates that despite several barriers to medical care, AR patients have similar outcomes to non-AR patients after ASCT. As a result, we encourage providers not to view Appalachian residence as an indicator of poorer outcomes. Instead, we recommend supporting and referring Appalachian patients for transplant as aggressively as non-Appalachian patients. This single-institution study should be evaluated with a larger multi-center cohort. Disclosures Brammer: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Current Employment. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy.

Characterization of molecular alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to development of targeted therapies, including FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors. Maintenance therapy following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has shown substantial promise. Enasidenib (ENA), a selective IDH2 inhibitor, was associated with impressive rates of response in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML and is now FDA-approved for this indication. We sought to assess the tolerability and define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ENA as maintenance following HCT for IDH2-mutated myeloid malignancy. HCT-eligible patients (pts) ≥ 18 years with AML in remission, or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with 1000/µL and platelets > 50000/µL). Those with prior HCT, active disease, QTc ≥450ms, and active infections were excluded. ENA was initiated between day 30 and 90 after HCT, at which time the following were required: chimerism ≥70% of donor origin among blood/marrow cells, no acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) requiring ≥0.5mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent, and no relapse. ENA was taken orally (po) daily (qd) in 28-day cycles. The period for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation was the first cycle, escalation to successive levels was guided by DLT incidence, and 2 levels (50mg,100mg) were studied. Following establishment of MTD or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 10 pts would be enrolled in an expansion cohort. Pts were monitored for relapse and toxicity and continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or receipt of 12 cycles. Nineteen pts have been registered prior to HCT at 3 sites, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Johns Hopkins Hospital. Three pts could not initiate ENA following HCT; 2 due to logistic challenges of the COVID pandemic and 1 due to relapse. The remaining 16 pts initiated ENA treatment. The median age was 61 years (range 31-76); 12 (75%) were male, and 13 (81%) were Caucasian. Fourteen (88%) had AML, of which 6 were AML with MDS related changes and 2 had antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm. Two pts (13%) had MDS. Among these 16 pts, 9 (56%) had IDH2 R140, and 5 (25%) had IDH2 R172 mutations. IDH2 subtype data was unavailable for 2 pts. Of 15 pts with available data from time of diagnosis, 11 (73%) had intermediate-risk and 4 (27%) had adverse-risk cytogenetics. Among these 15 pts, common concurrent mutations were DNMT3A (47%), SRSF2 (33%), and RUNX1 (33%). Eleven AML pts (85%) received intensive versus non-intensive therapies (15%) prior to HCT, and among all pts, 7 (44%) had received ENA prior to HCT. HCT data was available for all 16 pts; 4 pts (25%) received myeloablative, and 12 (75%) received reduced-intensity conditioning. Nine pts (56%) had a matched unrelated, 6 (38%) had haploidentical, and 1 (6%) had a matched related donor HCT. Three pts were enrolled at the 50mg dose level, 6 pts at 100mg, and after no DLTs were detected, the remaining were enrolled in an expansion cohort at 100mg qd. Median follow-up (F/U) for surviving patients is currently 11.7 months (range 1.5-18.9). 2 pts (13%) have relapsed during F/U, at 96 and 364 days post HCT. Additional ≥grade (G) 3 toxicities detected during treatment, possibly or probably related to ENA, included neutropenia, anemia, and bilirubinemia. Six pts (38%) required dose interruptions lasting a median 19 days (range 7-25), 4 required a dose reduction to 50mg, and 1 stopped treatment due to G3 bilirubinemia. In total, 3 pts (18%) discontinued study treatment, 1 for aforementioned G3 bilirubinemia, 1 to pursue a GVHD trial, and 1 for relapse. Six pts have completed the 12-month f/u without relapse, and 7 remain on study. 15 of 16 pts remain alive. Thus far, 3 pts have experienced ≥ G2 aGVHD, and 4 had moderate chronic GVHD. Serial measurement of 2HG is being conducted on samples, and these will be reported. Enasidenib is well-tolerated as post-HCT maintenance therapy for myeloid malignancy at the RP2D of 100mg qd. No DLTs have been detected, and a low rate of post-HCT relapse has been identified to date, although longer f/u is needed. Larger, randomized studies of ENA in the post-SCT setting would determine the true efficacy of this agent as maintenance therapy. Disclosures Fathi: Blueprint: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Soiffer:Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; alexion: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Be the Match/ National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy. Levis:Menarini: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Devine:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. Defilipp:Incyte: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Spitzer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frigault:Celgene: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding. Amrein:Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Hobbs:Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Brunner:Janssen: Research Funding; Acceleron Pharma Inc.: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Narayan:Genentech: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months and prior spouse equity divested within past 24 months; Takeda: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months; Sanofi-Genzyme: Other: Current Spouse employment . Chen:AbbVie: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Actinium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Equillium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Magenta: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Enasidenib as post-transplant maintenance therapy

Background: Allogeneic transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for a variety of hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Allo-HCT from a haploidentical (Haplo) related donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD). Haplo HCT patients however have higher risk of graft rejection and graft versus-host disease (GVHD). Thus, patients often receive post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has proven to be highly effective in reducing GVHD. While the use of peripheral blood is an attractive option due to the ease of collection and rapid peripheral blood count recovery, not much information is available on the impact of graft sources using PTCy in Haplo-HCT. This study compares outcomes of bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood (PB) stem cell graft for Haplo-HCT in adult patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 81 adult patients who underwent Haplo-HCT at The Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, engraftment, acute GVHD (grade II-IV), and chronic GVHD. All endpoints were measured from the time of transplantation. Patient, disease, and transplant-related characteristics were compared between the two groups (BM versus PB) using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and compared using log-rank test. Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: We compared the outcomes of patients who received a BM graft (N=43) with those receiving a PB graft (N=38). The median age at transplant was 57 years (20-74). All patients received PTCy in addition to tacrolimus and mycophenolate in 91% of patients. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was used in majority of patients (N=63, 78%). The two groups were comparable including age (median, 60 years for BM and 56 years for PB, p=0.60) and the type of conditioning regimen (79% RIC for BM, 76% RIC for PB, p=0.77). The number of CD34+ and CD3+ infused cells was higher in PB grafts (median, 8.6x106 CD34+ cells/Kg, 2.0 x108 CD3+ cells/Kg, respectively) than for BM (median, 3.7x106 CD34+cells/Kg, 0.4x108 CD3+cells/Kg, respectively). Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter in patients receiving PB versus those getting BM grafts: median 15 vs. 17.5 days, (p=0.02) and median 20 vs. 29 days (p Conclusion: Our study suggests peripheral blood for haploidentical transplant to be a good alternative to bone marrow. Similar PFS, OS and NRM were seen between the two graft sources. As expected, faster neutrophil and platelets engraftment were seen with PB due to more CD3+ and CD34+ infused, but without an increase in acute or chronic GVHD. A reduced relapse risk was observed with PB graft. Our study is small and is retrospective, but provide encouraging results. A prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy. William:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Amgen: Other: research support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees; Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Orcabio: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Background: Somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are reported in 6-10% of patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Ivosidenib (IVO) is an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and is FDA-approved for the treatment of mIDH1 relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML and mIDH1 newly diagnosed (ND) AML in adults ≥ 75 years of age or with comorbidities precluding intensive induction chemotherapy. In a phase 1 study (NCT02074839), durable remissions in pts with mIDH1 ND AML (n = 33) were achieved with IVO, with a complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate of 42.4%, and median overall survival of 12.6 months (mo), as of 02Nov2018. The most frequent co-occurring mutations at baseline were ASXL1, DNMT3A, RUNX1, SRSF2, TET2, and NRAS. Aim: To characterize the longitudinal evolution of gene mutations in pts with mIDH1 ND AML treated with IVO 500 mg once daily, including relapse mechanisms and depth of molecular response for mIDH1 and co-occurring mutations. Methods: The mIDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) was assessed in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and neutrophils using BEAMing digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology (Sysmex Inostics, Inc.), which has a lower limit of detection for mIDH1 of 0.02-0.04%. Deep IDH1 mutation clearance (MC) was defined as reduction in mIDH1 VAF to below the limit of detection for ≥ 1 on-treatment timepoint. Baseline and longitudinal co-occurring mutation profiling was conducted on BMMC or PBMC samples by next-generation sequencing (NGS; detection sensitivity of 1-5%). Single-cell targeted DNA sequencing (DNA-seq) was performed on PBMCs using a microfluidic platform (Tapestri®). The clinical data cut-off for this analysis was 02Nov2018. Results: In pts who achieved a best response of CR or CRh, the IDH1-MC rate in BMMCs was 64.3% (9/14), and 72.7% (8/11) in both PBMCs and neutrophils, by sensitive digital PCR (Table). Median time to IDH1-MC was 7.4 mo (BMMCs), 6.9 mo (PBMCs), and 5.1 mo (neutrophils) in pts achieving CR or CRh. IDH1-MC was significantly associated with a best response of CR or CRh (p < 0.001, Table). Overall survival at 12 mo was 88.9% (95% CI 43.3, 98.4) for pts with IDH1-MC in BMMCs (n = 9), as compared with 38.5% (95% CI 17.7, 59.0) for pts who did not achieve IDH1-MC (n = 21). The longitudinal evolution of mIDH1 and co-occurring mutations during IVO treatment was profiled by NGS in 27 pts. In 13 pts who achieved a best response of CR/CRh and with available data, non-DTA (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) gene mutation clearance was observed for IDH1 (11/13), RUNX1 (2/4), SRSF2 (2/3), and NPM1 (2/2). One pt had all co-occurring mutations (IDH1, FLT3, and NPM1) cleared by IVO monotherapy, and maintained CR for 30.2 mo as of the data cut-off. The most frequent mutations acquired at relapse or disease progression following IVO treatment were mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway genes (38.5%; 5/13), followed by mutations in chromatin remodeling (15.4%; 2/13) and IDH2 (7.7%; 1/13; Table). No IDH1 second-site mutations were observed in this cohort by NGS; however, emergence of an IDH1 R119P second-site mutation was observed in 1 pt using a single-cell DNA-seq assay. Conclusions: IDH1-MC across examined cell types (BMMCs, PBMC, and neutrophils) suggests that IVO can alter the biology of mIDH1 ND AML via reduction of the primitive mIDH1 cells. Similar to previous findings in R/R AML, the observed trend of improved overall survival in pts with deep molecular remission (ie, IDH1-MC) warrants further investigation in a larger pt cohort. Relapse is mediated by diverse emergent mutations, most frequently in RTK pathway genes, chromatin remodeling genes, and IDH2. Clonal architecture and evolution in ~ 20 pts revealed by single-cell DNA-seq analysis will be presented. Disclosures Choe: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Wang:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Roboz:Array BioPharma: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy. DiNardo:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ImmuneOnc: Honoraria; Syros: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Notable Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Calithera: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MedImmune: Honoraria. Stein:Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotheryx: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy. Watts:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Fan:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Nejad:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Zhang:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Liu:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Attar:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Wu:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Stone:Takeda: Consultancy; Arog: Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy, Other: Data and safety monitoring board; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gemoab: Consultancy; Elevate: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Syntrix: Consultancy; Hoffman LaRoche: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Biolinerx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and safety monitoring board; Trovagene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy.

B ackground Premature death from opioid-related causes imposes an enormous public health burden across the United States. Between 2001 and 2016, the number of opioid-related deaths in the United States increased by 345%, from 9489 to 42 245 deaths (33.3 to 130.7 deaths per million population. Moreover, opioids may have immunosuppressive properties independent of their psychotropic effects; opioid use has been associated with increased invasive pneumococcal disease in a nested case-control study of 1233 Medicaid patients from Tennessee. In liver transplant recipients, opioid use disorder has been associated with increased mortality after transplant. The impact of opioid use disorder on patients receiving blood and marrow transplant (BMT) remains to be defined. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult patients who had BMT (autologous and allogeneic) from 1/1/2008 through 1/1/2018 at the James Comprehensive Cancer Center. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of death, censoring at date of last follow up if alive. Progression free survival (PFS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of disease progression or the date of death, whichever occurred first, censoring at last follow up if no event. OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Opioid use (OU) was defined as a binary yes/no variable if an opioid was prescribed upon discharge from the hospital after BMT. The impact of OU, along with other patient, disease, and BMT related factors, on PFS/OS, was analyzed using Cox regression method. Results A total of 1585 patients were included in the analysis (Table 1). The median age at BMT was 58 (range=18-79) years; 59% were males; 60% had autologous transplants; and 58% were prescribed opioids upon discharge from the hospital. OU was significantly more in patients who were younger, have had allogeneic transplant, reduced intensity conditioning, had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or higher BMT comorbidity index (CMI). On univariable analysis, OU was not associated with cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) or PFS however it was associated with inferior OS; hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49; p=0.01 (Figure-1). There were no differences in CIR, PFS, or OS when autologous and allogeneic transplants were analyzed separately. Upon multivariable analysis of OS, OU lost statistical significance after controlling for age, diagnosis, type of transplant, intensity of conditioning regimen, CMI, and disease risk index (DRE). Of interest, OU independently predicted for superior OS at 100 days and 365 days post-BMT; HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.50 (p= Conclusion: Our results suggest that opioid use (OU) may have a long term negative impact on survival in BMT patients. The apparently protective effects of OU early on after BMT is elusive but may be possibly related immunomodulatory effects of opioids. A major limitation of our study is that OU is analyzed at a single time point at hospital discharge after BMT. We plan to undertake a more detailed analysis of ongoing OU after discharge and its impact on survival outcomes after BMT. Disclosures Brammer: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mims:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chaudhry:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background: Relapsed and refractory myeloid malignancies including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain a clinical challenge due to high morbidity and mortality as well as a paucity of effective therapeutic agents. PLX2853 is an orally available, non-benzodiazepine bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor that exhibits low nanomolar potency and a modest preference for binding to the second bromodomain (BD2) of the BET proteins. By regulating genes (e.g., MYC and BCL2) critical to leukemic cell growth and survival, PLX2853 has demonstrated broad anti-leukemic activity both as a single agent and in combination with other therapeutic agents in preclinical models. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in patients with AML or MDS revealed high peak plasma concentrations, a short terminal half-life (T1/2 < 3 hour), and nearly complete elimination from the plasma by 9 hour post dose. This PK profile is hypothesized to enable improved tolerability by allowing transient target engagement followed by time for recovery after daily dosing. Methods: This is an open-label, Phase 1b (Ph1b) study of PLX2853 as a single oral agent administered daily for 21 day cycles in adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML or high risk MDS. A modified continuous reassessment model with escalation with overdose control is employed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Primary objectives include safety and PK. Secondary objectives include measures of preliminary efficacy, and exploratory objectives include pharmacodynamics (PD) biomarker assessments. Enrollment through Cohort 5 (140 mg QD) is ongoing as of July 2020. Results: 9 subjects with relapsed or refractory AML and 7 subjects with high risk MDS (median age 65.7 years, range 47-77 years old; median number of prior therapies 2.3, range 1-5 prior therapies) have received PLX2853 in escalating doses from 20 to 140 mg QD. Through the data cut-off of 19 Jul 2020 (n=16), the most common treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality occurring in ≥20% of patients (n≥4) are: decreased appetite (n=9), (n=8), fatigue (N=8), hyperbilirubinemia (N=8), nausea (n=7), constipation (n=6), hypokalemia (n=6), leukopenia (n=6), vomiting (n=5), international normalised ratio increased (n=5), proteinuria (n=5), and dyspnea (n=5). Most were grade (G) 1-2. Treatment emergent AEs > G2 in > 1 patients are: anemia (n=7), leukopenia (n=5) hyperbilirubinemia (n=4), febrile neutropenia (n=4), sepsis (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=3), hypertension (n=2), lymphocyte count decreased (n=3), and neutrophil count decreased (n=3). No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) has been observed. Following a daily dose of PLX2853 the median time to reach maximal plasma concentration (Tmax) is 1 hour, and no accumulation observed at steady state, which is consistent with the short T1/2 (< 3 hours). Dose-dependent increases in exposures were observed across the dose range tested (20-80 mg daily). Fifteen of 16 subjects have completed at least 1 cycle of treatment. The following best overall responses have been observed: 1 subject with a confirmed marrow complete remission, 1 subject with a partial remission (myeloid sarcoma), 10 subjects with stable disease, 1 subject with progressive disease, and 3 subjects not evaluable. Conclusions: In an ongoing Ph1b study of PLX2853, four cohorts have been completed with continuous, once daily dosing in patients with relapsed or refractory AML or high risk MDS, and no DLTs have been observed yet. As dose escalation continues, PK, PD, preliminary safety, and efficacy data will be reviewed further to determine the clinical significance of this BET inhibitor and identify the RP2D. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03787498. Disclosures Mims: Agios: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Borate:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Investigator in AbbVie-funded clinical trials; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pemmaraju:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; SagerStrong Foundation: Other: Grant Support; Celgene: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; MustangBio: Honoraria; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria; Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Plexxikon: Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Honoraria. Borthakur:BioTherix: Consultancy; BioLine Rx: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; FTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Nkarta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Roboz:Agios: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Powell:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Severson:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Matusow:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Halladay:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Hsu:Daiichi Sankyo Inc.: Current Employment. Watkins:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Zhang:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. Walling:Plexxikon Inc.: Consultancy; Aduro Biotech: Consultancy; Arch Oncology: Consultancy; CytomX Therapeutics: Consultancy; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy; ImmuNext: Consultancy; Myovant Sciences: Consultancy; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Que Oncology: Consultancy; Sesen Bio: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Aminex: Consultancy; Crown Bio: Consultancy; Leap Therapeutics: Consultancy; Prothena Corporation: Consultancy; Puma Biotechnology: Consultancy; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Shanghai Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Stealth Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Upsher-Smith Laboratories: Consultancy; Flag Therapeutics: Consultancy; January Therapeutics: Consultancy. Tsiatis:Plexxikon Inc.: Current Employment. DeZern:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; MEI: Consultancy.

Introduction Immunotherapy offers the promise of a new paradigm for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). CD123, the IL-3 receptor alpha-chain, represents an attractive target for antibody therapies because of its high expression on AML/MDS blasts and leukemic stem cells compared to normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. APVO436, a novel bispecific anti-CD123 x anti-CD3 ADAPTIR™ molecule, depleted CD123+ cells in AML patient samples ex vivo (Godwin et al. ASH 2017), reduced leukemia engraftment in a systemic AML xenograft model (Comeau et al. AACR 2018), and transiently reduced peripheral CD123+ cells in non-human primates with minimal cytokine release and in a dose-dependent fashion (Comeau et al. AACR 2019). These data provide a basis for the clinical application of APVO436 as a treatment in AML and MDS. Here, we report preliminary data from a first-in-human dose-escalation study of APVO436 in patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS. Study Design/Methods This ongoing Phase 1/1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03647800) was initiated to determine the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of APVO436 as a single agent. Major inclusion criteria were: R/R AML with no other standard treatment option available, R/R MDS with > 5% marrow blasts or any peripheral blasts and failure of a hypomethylating agent, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, life expectancy > 2 months, white blood cells ≤ 25,000 cells/mm3, creatinine ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN), INR and PTT < 1.5 x ULN and alanine aminotransferase < 3 x ULN. Patients were not restricted from treatment due to cytogenetic or mutational status. Intravenous doses of APVO436 were administered weekly for up to six 28-day cycles (24 doses) with the option to continue dosing for up to 36 total cycles (144 doses). Flat and step dosing regimens were escalated using a safety-driven modified 3 + 3 design. Pre-medication with diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and dexamethasone was administered starting with dose 1 to mitigate infusion related reactions (IRR) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). First doses and increasing step doses of APVO436 were infused over 20-24 hours followed by an observation period of 24 hours or more. Bone marrow biopsies were performed every other cycle with responses assessed by European Leukemia Net 2017 criteria for AML or International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria for MDS. Results The data cut-off for this interim analysis was July 9, 2020. Twenty-eight patients with primary R/R AML (n=19), therapy-related R/R AML (n=3), or high-risk MDS (n=6) have been enrolled and received a cumulative total of 186 doses. The number of doses received per patient ranged from 1 to 43 (mean of 6.4 doses). Most patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease; however, blast reduction was achieved in 2 patients, with one patient with MDS maintaining a durable response for 11 cycles before progressing. APVO436 was tolerated across all dose regimens in all cohorts tested. The most common adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were edema (32%), diarrhea (29%), febrile neutropenia (29%), fever (25%), hypokalemia (25%), IRR (21%), CRS (18%), chills (18%), and fatigue (18%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in more than one patient were: febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (18%), hyperglycemia (14%), decreased platelet count (11%), CRS (11%), IRR (7%), and hypertension (7%). After observing a single dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at a flat dose of 9 µg, step dosing was implemented and no DLTs have been observed thereafter. No treatment-related anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were observed. Transient serum cytokine elevations occurred after several reported IRR and CRS events, with IL-6 most consistently elevated. Conclusions Preliminary results indicate that APVO436 is tolerated in patients with R/R AML and MDS at the doses and schedules tested to date, with a manageable safety profile. Dose escalation continues and the results will be updated for this ongoing study. Disclosures Watts: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cull:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patel:Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; DAVA Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Shami:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cogle:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chenault:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Macpherson:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chunyk:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. McMahan:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gross:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Stromatt:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Introduction PML is a rare infection with JC virus affecting mostly oligodendrocytes and the white matter of the central nervous system. It affects patients with profound cellular immunodeficiency such as uncontrolled HIV or those receiving immunosuppression for neoplastic and autoimmune diseases. Prognosis is poor as there is no effective therapy except for immune recovery which is not feasible in all cases. Herein, we describe using Quadrivalent (CMV,EBV, Adenovirus and BK) VSTs in a recipient of an unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with PML. Methods A 64-year-old female with history of acute myeloid leukemia who underwent 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donor peripheral blood HCT complicated by acute mild skin graft vs host disease. She was off all immunosuppression by 7 months post transplant. At 15 months post HCT, she presented with mild confusion, left hemianopia and difficulty performing some routine tasks. Brain MRI showed demyelination involving the right parietal lobe, corpus callosum and bilateral dorsal periventricular areas. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with JC virus DNA load of 389,773 copies/ml. Serum JC virus level was 1112 copies/ml and CD 4 218 (8.7%). Patient was referred to Cincinnati Children's Hospital for third-party VST infusion . A 3/10 HLA matched unit from their existing VST bank was infused 3 days after her PML diagnosis. She received a total of 6 VST infusions, each 28 days apart. Results Patient was monitored with monthly CSF JC virus and weekly serum JC virus levels. JC virus was cleared from serum and CSF after the fourth and fifth VST infusions, respectively (figure 1). T cell expansion analysis against BK was done by ELISpot (figure 2). Patient received a total of 6 VST infusions. Neuro symptoms stabilized after the second infusion. At 7.5 months from diagnosis (3 months since last VST infusion), she remained neurologically stable with no new deficits, GVHD or other toxicities. Conclusions VSTs with BK activity is a promising therapy for PML patients in whom immune reconstitution is unlikely to occur in a short time frame. More studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and long term outcomes of this method. Physicians should be aware of this novel therapy in selected PML cases given poor disease outcomes and lack of effective alternative therapies.

Background: Consolidation therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is recommended to prevent relapse and improve survival in patients with intermediate and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Due to toxicity, older patients with comorbidities were historically not candidates for HSCT. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has allowed more patients to proceed to HSCT by reducing toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC).The cornerstone of reducing conditioning regimen intensity is modification of busulfan exposure, expressed as an area under the curve (AUC). This can be achieved by the use of patient-specific pharmacokinetic targets. Previous studies (including BMT CTN 0901) have demonstrated RIC regimens were associated with less toxicity at the cost of potentially decreased survival relative to weight-based MAC regimens. At OSU, we have utilized an AUC target of 4,000 μmol-min/L per day x 4 days in a subset of patients to balance reduced toxicity with risk of relapse. Here we compare outcomes of AUC 4,000 to weight-based RIC Flu/Bu2. Methods: To compare the two regimens, a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort study was conducted. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18-89 years, HSCT for a diagnosis of AML or MDS, and fludarabine + busulfan conditioning regimen ± antithymocyte globulin. In the AUC 4,000 group, the target busulfan exposure was 16,000 μmol-min/L divided over 4 daily doses. In the RIC group, patents received busulfan 0.8 mg/kg/dose for 8 doses (Flu/Bu2). The primary outcome was relapse free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS); time to neutrophil recovery; time to platelet recovery; incidence of acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD); sinusoidal obstructive syndrome; febrile neutropenia; graft failure; and grade 3-5 mucositis, acute kidney injury, or hepatic dysfunction. The log-rank test was used to compare RFS and OS, and Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. Gray's test was used for competing risks analysis of relapse, acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD. Fine and Gray regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio. Results: Seventy-four patients who received conditioning from 2015-2018 with either AUC 4,000 or RIC were identified. Disease type was similar between groups with 61.8% AML in the AUC 4,000 group and 52.5% in the RIC group. There were no significant differences in disease risk status. In the AUC 4,000 group, 17.6% had either AML with myelodysplastic changes or therapy-related AML/MDS, compared to 17.5% in the RIC group. The percent of patients with HCT-Comorbidity Index score of ≥ 3 was 52.9% for AUC 4,000 and 77.5% for RIC. At 18 months, RFS was not significantly different, at 66.9% with AUC 4,000 compared to 57.5% with RIC (p=0.37) (A). Eighteen-month overall survival was also not significantly different with 66.9% alive in the AUC 4,000 group and 60% in the RIC group (p=0.63) (B). Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD were not significantly different (p=0.82, p=0.18, respectively) (C,D). There was, however, a statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse over 18 months in favor of the AUC 4,000 regimen (hazard ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 1.15-14.5) (E). Grade 2-4 mucositis was more common in the AUC 4,000 group (85.3% vs 30%, p Discussion: Though no significant difference existed in disease risk between the groups, choice of regimen was driven by physician judgement, perceived fitness, and ability to tolerate potential adverse effects. Thus, the results of this study indicate that with patient selection, there is no significant RFS or OS difference, or risk of acute or chronic GVHD between targeted AUC 4,000 and RIC. However, AUC 4,000 was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse. Adverse effects other than mucositis were not significantly different between groups. In order to definitively compare these two conditioning regimens, a prospective study is needed. Figure Disclosures Brammer: Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vasu:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Clinical trial support. William:Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy. Saad:Actinium Pharma Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Kadmon: Other: Research Support; OrcaBio: Other: Research Support.

Background Haplo-HCT emerged as a reliable option for patients with high risk hematological malignancies with no HLA-matched related or unrelated donors available. Retrospective registry data suggest comparable outcomes to HLA-matched donors; however, relatively little is known regarding predictors of disease relapse following haplo-HCT. We hypothesize that attainment of full-donor CD3 and CD33 chimerism at day 30 (D30) and 100 (D100) is associated with lower incidence of relapse after haplo-HCT. Methods We undertook a retrospective analysis of 78 patients who underwent haplo-HCT at the Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital between January 2013 and December 2017. The associations between patient characteristics including CD3/CD33 donor chimerisms and the cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of relapse were evaluated using proportional sub-distribution hazards model, treating death without relapse as the competing risk. The models were built adopting a landmark analysis approach at D30 and D100. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Results Median age at haplo-HCT was 56 (20-74) years and 68% were males. 50% had acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, and 54% had intermediate disease risk index (DRI). Most patients (85%) received reduced-intensity conditioning and 50% received bone marrow (BM) grafts. Complete (100%) CD3 donor chimerism was observed in 63 (84%) patients at D30, and subsequently 59 (95%) patients at D100. Complete CD33 donor chimerism was observed in 67 (89%) patients at D30, and subsequently 56 (88%) patients at D100. In univariable D30 landmark analysis, the CIR of relapse was significantly lower in patients who achieved complete CD3 (and CD33) chimerism compared with patients with less than complete chimerism (Figure 1A; p Conclusions Complete CD3 and CD33 donor chimerisms at D30 and D100 predict a patient's risk for relapse following haplo-HCT. We observed a strong association between CD3 chimeric status at D30 with DRI, as well suggestive that high risk disease may be associated with impaired immune reconstitution after transplant and perhaps a less robust graft vs disease effect.

The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) increases with age. Intensive induction chemotherapy containing cytarabine and an anthracycline has been part of the upfront and salvage treatment of AML for decades. Anthracyclines are associated with a significant risk of cardiotoxicity (especially anthracycline-related left ventricular dysfunction [ARLVD]). In the older adult population, the higher prevalence of cardiac comorbidities and risk factors may further increase the risk of ARLVD. In this article of the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology group, we review the prevalence of ARLVD in patients with AML and factors predisposing to ARLVD, focusing on older adults when possible. In addition, we review the assessment of cardiac function and management of ARLVD during and after treatment. It is worth noting that only a minority of clinical trials focus on alternative treatment strategies in patients with mildly declined left ventricular ejection fraction or at a high risk for ARLVD. The limited evidence for preventive strategies to ameliorate ARLVD and alternative strategies to anthracycline use in the setting of cardiac comorbidities are discussed. Based on extrapolation of findings from younger adults and nonrandomized trials, we recommend a comprehensive baseline evaluation of cardiac function by imaging, cardiac risk factors, and symptoms to risk stratify for ARLVD. Anthracyclines remain an appropriate choice for induction although careful risk-stratification based on cardiac disease, risk factors, and predicted chemotherapy-response are warranted. In case of declined left ventricular ejection fraction, alternative strategies should be considered.

Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an oral, targeted agent that suppresses production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate via inhibition of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; mIDH1) enzyme. From a phase 1 study of 258 patients with IDH1-mutant hematologic malignancies, we report results for 34 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for standard therapy who received 500 mg ivosidenib daily. Median age was 76.5 years, 26 patients (76%) had secondary AML, and 16 (47%) had received ≥1 hypomethylating agent for an antecedent hematologic disorder. The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (n = 18; 53%), fatigue (n = 16; 47%), nausea (n = 13; 38%), and decreased appetite (n = 12; 35%). Differentiation syndrome was reported in 6 patients (18%) (grade ≥3 in 3 [9%]) and did not require treatment discontinuation. Complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5% to 60.8%); CR 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6% to 48.7%). Median durations of CR+CRh and CR were not reached, with 95% CI lower bounds of 4.6 and 4.2 months, respectively; 61.5% and 77.8% of patients remained in remission at 1 year. With median follow-up of 23.5 months (range, 0.6-40.9 months), median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 4.5-25.7). Of 21 transfusion-dependent patients (63.6%) at baseline, 9 (42.9%) became transfusion independent. IDH1 mutation clearance was seen in 9/14 patients achieving CR+CRh (5/10 CR; 4/4 CRh). Ivosidenib monotherapy was well-tolerated and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence in patients with newly diagnosed AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #{"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02074839","term_id":"NCT02074839"}}NCT02074839.

Activating FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) associate with inferior outcomes. We determined that pacritinib, a JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, has in vitro activity against FLT3-ITD and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations. Therefore, we conducted a phase I study of pacritinib in combination with chemotherapy in AML patients with FLT3 mutations to determine the pharmacokinetics and preliminary toxicity and clinical activity. Pacritinib was administered at a dose of 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin (cohort A) or with decitabine induction (cohort B). A total of thirteen patients were enrolled (five in cohort A; eight in cohort B). Dose limiting toxicities include hemolytic anemia and grade 3 QTc prolongation in two patients who received 100 mg. Complete remission was achieved in two patients in cohort A, one of whom had a minor D835Y clone at baseline. One patient in cohort B achieved morphologic leukemia free state. Seven patients (two in cohort A; five in cohort B) had stable disease. In conclusion, pacritinib, an inhibitor of FLT3-ITD and resistant-conferring TKD mutations, was well tolerated and demonstrated preliminary anti-leukemic activity in combination with chemotherapy in patients with FLT3 mutations.

e19026 Background: The USFDA has recently approved several oral targeted therapies for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The relative survival impact of these agents vs standard induction chemotherapy in the frontline setting is unknown, especially in patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-institution study of 125 patients with AML diagnosed 2015-2020 who received HCT. Patients were included if induced with high intensity chemotherapy (HiC) or lower intensity targeted therapy (LITT). HiC was defined as cytarabine + anthracycline given on a “7+3” based schedule. LITT was defined as venetoclax, gilteritinib, enasidenib, or ivosidenib alone or combined with hypomethylating agent. Patients receiving liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin were excluded. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Between-groups analysis was conducted comparing receipt of any HiC to LITT only. OS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test; NRM and CIR was estimated through cumulative incidence function and compared by Fine-Gray test. Results: Of 125 HCT recipients, 108 received any HiC and 17 LITT only. Two patients received HiC after suboptimal response to LITT. Median age at HCT was 61 years, 48% were female, and 90% were in complete remission at HCT. Population characteristics and outcomes as well as between-groups comparison are presented in the table. LITT only group was older with longer time to HCT and exclusively received RIC. With median follow-up of 23 months, median OS had not been reached. There were no statistically significant differences in median OS or one-year NRM or CIR between groups. Conclusions: Despite differences in age, conditioning regimen, and time to HCT in patients receiving any HiC vs LITT only, we have shown similar OS, CIR, and NRM. Difference in age is in contrast to lack of difference in HCT-CI and KPS, but is partially explained by limited access to LITT for younger patients. Longer time to HCT among LITT only recipients represents a major opportunity for pre-HCT optimization of recipient health. Prospective study from time of diagnosis will be important to understanding the appropriate use of LITT in HCT-eligible patients.[Table: see text]

e19004 Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has traditionally been treated frontline with intensive induction chemotherapy in patients fit enough for this treatment. The FDA has approved several oral targeted therapies for AML in recent years. The survival impact of these agents vs induction chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, patients diagnosed with AML from 2015-2020 were included if they received treatment with either high intensity chemotherapy (HiC) or lower intensity targeted therapy (LITT). HiC was defined as a regimen containing cytarabine + anthracycline given on a “7+3” based schedule. Patients treated with liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin were excluded. LITT was defined as venetoclax, gilteritinib, enasidenib, or ivosidenib alone or in combination with a hypomethylating agent. Patients fell into four groups: HiC only, LITT only, HiC followed by LITT, and LITT followed by HiC with assignment censored at transplant. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and patients receiving any HiC vs LITT only were compared using log-rank test. Results: A total of 332 patients were included: 177 received HiC only, 116 LITT only, 32 HiC before LITT, and 7 LITT before HiC. Baseline characteristics and OS data are outlined in the table. The any HiC group had a lower median age and more patients with WBC >10 K/µL at diagnosis, as well as more patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). OS was superior in the any HiC group vs LITT only group. Receipt of any HiC remained predictive of OS after adjusting for age (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.96, p = 0.03); however, was no longer predictive of OS after adjusting for age and receipt of HCT. Conclusions: While HiC was associated with superior OS compared to LITT only treatment in univariable analysis, the survival benefit was no longer apparent after adjusting for age and receipt of HCT. The results suggest that intensity of AML treatment is less impactful on prognosis than ability to receive HCT. Differences in age were likely confounded by clinical trial eligibility and prescribing information specifically affecting patients receiving LITT. In the era of LITT, prospective randomized studies of intensity of AML therapy, particularly in non-favorable risk disease, are imperative to striking a balance between toxicity and cure for patients of all ages.[Table: see text]

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological malignancies and disorders. However, this potential is often impeded by several factors including relapse of the underlying disease, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and infectious complications. Specifically, acute GVHD continues to be a major factor in the morbidity and mortality of patients. Hence, the practice of allo-SCT is continuously evolving to mitigate these factors. In particular, advances in the conditioning regimens, GVHD prophylaxis, infectious disease monitoring and prophylaxis and supportive care not only have resulted in improved outcomes, but also have expanded potential indications for allo-HSCT. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis on patients who underwent allo-SCT at The Ohio State University from 1986-2018 to better understand how survival has changed longitudinally in accordance with these therapeutic advancements. Method: We analyzed data from 1943 consecutive patients who received an allo-SCT. Patients were divided into seven groups based on the year of transplant: groups (gp) 1: 1984-1988, 2: 1989-1993, 3: 1994-1998, 4: 1999-2003, 5: 2004-2008, 6: 2009-2013, and 7: 2014-2018. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), and log-rank test was used to compare across transplant years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: Across the years (1984-2018), the median age was 50.0 (range: 18-76) with 59.6% of the patients being male. Acute myeloid leukemia accounted for 36.3% of transplants, followed by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14.2%), acute lymphoid leukemia (11.8%), chronic myeloid leukemia (10.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (10.0%). Fifty-five percent of patients received myeloablative conditioning. Across the groups, statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed (p Conclusion: Our data shows improved overall and progression-free survival post allo-SCT over decades, which may be attributed to advances in supportive care, and GVHD and relapse mitigation therapy. The decline in NRM is also likely due to improved supportive measures such as infectious disease monitoring and prophylaxis. Nonetheless, post-transplant relapse and grade III-IV aGVHD remain prominent challenges. Therefore, future research should continue to investigate therapeutic strategies that can both reduce high grade GVHD while limiting post-transplant relapse. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dova: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Amgen: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support; Orcabio: Other: research support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) plays a key role in the post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients due to its high rates of efficacy as compared to alternate therapies. For patients with relapsed/refractory AML and those with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), it remains the sole curative option. However, these patients continue to have significant obstacles for successful transplant including risk for relapse of underlying disease, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and infectious complications. Outcomes of allo-SCT in these patients have improved over time with the evolution of practice of allo-SCT, including modifications of transplant conditioning regimens, supportive care, and earlier recognition of transplant complications. Our study sought to assess the trends in survival in AML and MDS patients undergoing allogeneic transplant at The Ohio State University from 1984-2018. Methods: We analyzed data from 900 consecutive patients who received an allo-SCT (705 AML and 195 MDS). The patients were stratified into 7 different groups based on year of transplant using 5 year increments; group (gp) 1 included 1984-1988, gp 2 1989-1993, gp 3 1994-1998, gp 4 1999-2003, gp 5 2004-2008, gp 6 2009-2013, and gp 7 2014-2018. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were utilized as primary end points. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: Median age at transplant was 52 years (yrs) old (range 18-76) and 55.6% were male. Patients having myeloablative (MA) conditioning regimen comprised 57.6% of the cohort. From 1984 to 2018, there was a statistically significant improvement in both PFS and OS (Figure 1 a and b; p Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant improvement over the past several decades in survival in AML and MDS patients undergoing allo-SCT. Major factors that likely contribute to improvement in outcomes throughout the years include adjustments in conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis, earlier recognition of complications as well as improved management, and improved general supportive care. Overall, while outcomes have improved significantly throughout the years, post-transplant relapses remains the leading cause of transplant failure in this group. Preventing relapse post-transplant represents a continued target for research today. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University. Jaglowski:CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Brammer:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Introduction-Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) poses as a major late complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The role of cGVHD as a determinant in transplant-related morbidity and mortality, infectious complications, prolonged immune suppression, and impaired patient-reported quality of life has been extensively studied. Nonetheless, numerous advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) in recent years have expanded the indications for allo-SCT to a broader range of patients, including previously excluded older patients. However, long-term health status of older transplant recipients is poorly studied. Notably, the incidence of cGVHD may increase with age. Therefore, the development of cGVHD and the use of immunosuppressive therapy may lead to a higher degree of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare the NRM in both younger and older transplant recipients with and without cGVHD. Methods-We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent allo-SCT at the Ohio State University from 1999 to 2018. Data was analyzed from 1194 patients who survived or have been followed up with by at least day (d) 180 post-transplantation, among which 373 patients had developed cGVHD. Patients were grouped based on their age into a younger and older population. The older population was defined as ≥60 (N=373, 31%) with the younger population defined as Results-The median age at allo-SCT was 53.0 yr (range: 18-76) and 61.1% were male. Acute myeloid leukemia accounted for 36.7% of transplants, followed by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (14.8%), acute lymphoid leukemia (12.7%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (11.0%). Additionally, 58.0% received reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. The majority of stem cell donor types were match unrelated (45.3%) and match related (39.8%). Patients who had developed cGVHD by d180, regardless of age, were at higher risk of NRM compared to patients with no cGVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.99; p=0.002). To examine the influence of age with NRM, we stratified the analysis by cGVHD status by d180. Among patients developed cGVHD by d180, in both univariable (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.79-1.9, p=0.373) and multivariable analysis (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.74-1.87; p=0.501), there was no statistically significant difference in NRM between patients ≥60 and Conclusion-This study showed that patients with cGVHD by day 180 were at higher risk for higher NRM compared to patients without cGVHD. Among cGVHD patients, there was no difference on the outcome of older patients (≥60 years old) compared to younger ones ( Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy. William:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dova: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Mims:Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees; Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Amgen: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support; Orcabio: Other: research support. Efebera:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

e19510 Background: Over 40% of newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients receiving induction therapy develop acute respiratory failure. Bronchoscopy is a valuable tool for evaluating airway disease, but its diagnostic yield in this setting has not been fully explored. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 75 newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients who had bronchoscopies. Data recorded prior to bronchoscopy included age, diagnosis, induction treatment regimen, chest imaging, assisted ventilation, duration of neutropenia and antibiotic therapy and microbiological studies. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures were sorted by organism, as well as by other pathologic findings. The primary outcome was antibiotic change supported by culture data. Results: The study population is summarized in the table. Induction regimen backbones included 7+3 (51), 7+4+ATRA (2), decitabine (12), hyperCVAD (2), AYA (3), other (1) and none (4); 18 patients were treated on clinical trial. Average days of neutropenia was 10.92 and average days of antibiotic therapy was 10.57. Thirty-eight patients had chest infiltrates, 11 received NIPPV, and 17 were mechanically ventilated. We identified 24 patients with +BAL studies. Of these, 37.5% (9) had + blood, urine or sputum studies before bronchoscopy, but only 3 had cultures positive for the same organism as the BAL. Of 51 patients with –BAL studies, 33.3% (17) had prior negative cultures. Infections were most commonly bacterial (15, 62.5%), followed by viral (5, 20.8%) and fungal (4, 16.7%). The most common organisms were rhinovirus, vancomycin sensitive Enterococcus (4, 16.7% each) followed by VRE, Candida albicans and MRSA (2, 8.3% each). Five patients (6.7%) had alveolar hemorrhage. Of the 24 patients with +BAL cultures, bronchoscopy findings supported changing antibiotics in 18. In contrast, antibiotics were changed in 16 patients without +BAL cultures. Conclusions: We investigated the utility of bronchoscopy on AL patients during their initial admission. BAL cultures were positive in 32% of newly diagnosed AL patients undergoing bronchoscopy. However, +BAL cultures identified a new organism in 87.5% and guided antibiotic therapy in 75% of these patients. Further studies will be needed to establish predictors of bronchoscopy findings in this patient population. [Table: see text]

7515 Background: Therapy-related AML (tAML) is a long-term complication of cytotoxic cancer therapy. It is characterized by adverse genetics and inferior survival outcomes when compared to de novo AML. A proposed mechanism in tAML pathogenesis includes treatment-induced selection of clones harboring pre-existing mutations (i.e. clonal hematopoiesis, CH). We hypothesize that genotoxic therapies used to treat prior malignancy drive leukemogenesis through different mechanisms leading to unique clonal compositions. Methods: AML patients (pts) treated at The Ohio State University between 2015-2018 were included. Genetic profiling was performed using Miseq Illumina platform with a 49-gene targeted sequencing panel at our clinical laboratory. Results: We studied 337 AML pts (Table), of whom 53% had smoking history. Mutations involving ASXL1 were more common in smokers vs non-smokers (14% vs 5.8%, p= .001), while JAK2 mutations were more common in non-smokers (8% vs 1.2%, p= .003). Regarding specific genotoxic therapies and mutations in tAML, we investigated common CH-associated mutations including DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 (DTA mutations). In tAML pts, those exposed to radiotherapy experienced a higher frequency of DTA (52% vs 27%, p= .05), NPM1 (21% vs 0%, p= .002), and SRSF2 (15% vs 0%, p= .01) mutations, and conversely, a lower incidence of TP53 mutations (21% vs 46%, p= .04). Pts with history of cytotoxic chemotherapy had a lower incidence of DTA mutations, including those who received platinum agents (8% vs 49%, p= .005) and taxanes (7% vs 52%, p< .001), but had a higher incidence of TP53 mutations (75% vs 25%, p< .001 for platinum; 53% vs 25%, p= .04 for taxanes). Similarly, alkylators and anthracyclines were associated with lower incidence of DNMT3A (0% vs 20%, p= .009) and ASXL1 (0% vs 12.5%, p= .04) mutations. Conclusions: Different genotoxic agents demonstrate unique effects in leukemia development. Our data suggest that CH clones with DTA mutations may be enriched with smoking and radiotherapy, while cytotoxic chemotherapy may confer a higher incidence of TP53 mutations. Given the adverse prognosis of TP53 mutated AML, identification of pre-existing CH clones might influence treatment selection in solid tumor pts receiving anticancer therapy. [Table: see text]

Introduction Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Preventing GVHD without impairing the graft-versus-tumor effect remains an important goal for successful allo-HSCT. Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor that prevents T-cell activation, is commonly used as aGVHD prophylaxis. The influence of TAC has proved effective for preventing aGVHD after allo-HSCT. There is also variability in the serum concentrations of TAC and very little is known on the impact of early (first 4 weeks) TAC levels on aGVHD incidence. Methods Data were analyzed for 707 consecutive patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the Ohio State University between 2002- 2016. All patients received standard prophylaxis with TAC daily and methotrexate on days +1, +3, +6, and +11 post allo-HSCT. Tacrolimus dose was adjusted to achieve a target serum level of 5-12 ng/ml. Fine and Gray's proportional hazard models accounting for competing risks were used to evaluate the association between TAC levels and outcome of aGVHD, cGVHD, GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS),and relapse. Cox proportional hazard models were used for the association with OS. Results The mean weekly TAC concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 8.0, 9.7, 11.3 and 10.5 ng/mL, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grades II–IV aGVHD was 40% at day 100 and 45% at day 180 post HSCT. In univariable analysis, high TAC level at week 1 was associated with lower grade II-IV aGVHD (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; p = 0.006). We examined the effect of week 1 TAC levels categorized into tertiles ( 8.95 ng/ml). Higher level of TAC (>8.95 ng/ml) was associated with lower risk of aGVHD (Figure 1a). In multivariable analysis, week 1 TAC levels > 5.85 ng/ml remained associated with a lower risk of grade II-IV aGVHD. However, only levels of 5.85-8.95 ng/ml were associated with statistically significant lower risk with HR=0.75, p=0.04 compared to the lower group ( 7.2 ng/ml (HR: 0.78, p=0.03). The CI of cGVHD was 41% at 1 year post-allo-HSCT. Week 2 TAC level >10.6 ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR, 1.37, p=0.043) (Figure 1b). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1, 3 and 5 year post allo-HSCT was 33%, 38% and 40%, respectively. TAC levels at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were not associated with OS. The 1, 3 and 5 year GRFS was 21%, 14% and 12%.TAC levels at any week were not associated with GRFS. Conclusion Achieving mean whole-blood level of tacrolimus between 6.0-9.0 ng/ml within the first week post-allogenic bone marrow transplantation may reduce the risk of aGVHD.

Treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain extremely limited and associated with significant toxicity. Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) is involved in the generation of NAD+ and a potential therapeutic target in AML. We evaluated the effect of KPT-9274, a p21-activated kinase 4/NAMPT inhibitor that possesses a unique NAMPT-binding profile based on in silico modeling compared with earlier compounds pursued against this target. KPT-9274 elicited loss of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis and induced apoptosis in AML subtypes independent of mutations and genomic abnormalities. These actions occurred mainly through the depletion of NAD+, whereas genetic knockdown of p21-activated kinase 4 did not induce cytotoxicity in AML cell lines or influence the cytotoxic effect of KPT-9274. KPT-9274 exposure reduced colony formation, increased blast differentiation, and diminished the frequency of leukemia-initiating cells from primary AML samples; KPT-9274 was minimally cytotoxic toward normal hematopoietic or immune cells. In addition, KPT-9274 improved overall survival in vivo in 2 different mouse models of AML and reduced tumor development in a patient-derived xenograft model of AML. Overall, KPT-9274 exhibited broad preclinical activity across a variety of AML subtypes and warrants further investigation as a potential therapeutic agent for AML.

KMT2A partial tandem duplication occurs in approximately 5–10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and is associated with adverse prognosis. KMT2A wild type is epigenetically silenced in KMT2A partial tandem duplication; re-expression can be induced with DNA methyltransferase and/or histone deacetylase inhibitors in vitro, sensitizing myeloid blasts to chemotherapy. We hypothesized that epigenetic silencing of KMT2A wildtype contributes to KMT2A partial tandem duplication-associated leukemogenesis and pharmacologic re-expression activates apoptotic mechanisms important for chemoresponse. We developed a regimen for this unique molecular subset, but due to relatively low frequency of KMT2A partial tandem duplication, this dose finding study was conducted in relapsed/refractory disease regardless of molecular subtype. Seventeen adults (< age 60) with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia were treated on study. Patients received decitabine 20 milligrams/meter2 daily on days 1–10 and vorinostat 400 milligrams daily on days 5–10. Cytarabine was dose-escalated from 1.5 grams/meter2 every 12 hours to 3 grams/meter2 every 12 hours on days 12, 14 and 16. Two patients experienced dose limiting toxicities at dose level 1 due to prolonged myelosuppression. However, as both patients achieved complete remission after Day 42, the protocol was amended to adjust the definition of hematologic dose limiting toxicity. No further dose limiting toxicities were found. Six of 17 patients achieved complete remission including 2 of 4 patients with KMT2A partial tandem duplication. Combination therapy with decitabine, vorinostat and cytarabine was tolerated in younger relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and should be explored further focusing on the KMT2A partial tandem duplication subset. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier 01130506).

// Kumar Saurabh 1,* , Michael T. Scherzer 1,4,* , Parag P. Shah 1 , Alice S. Mims 5 , William W. Lockwood 6 , Andrew S. Kraft 5 and Levi J. Beverly 1,2,3,4 1 James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 4 Department of Bioengineering, J.B Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 5 Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 6 Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Levi J. Beverly, email: // Keywords : PIM-1, PIM-2, PIM-3, MYC, leukemia Received : July 08, 2014 Accepted : August 07, 2014 Published : August 08, 2014 Abstract PIM kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases involved in cell survival and proliferation. There is significant structural similarity between the three PIM kinases (PIM1, PIM2 and PIM3) and only few amino acid differences. Although, several studies have specifically monitored the role of PIM1 in tumorigenesis, much less is known about PIM2 and PIM3. Therefore, in this study we have used in vitro cell culture models and in vivo bone marrow infection/transplantation to assess the comparative signaling and oncogenic potential of each of the three PIM kinases. All three PIM kinases were able to protect FL5.12 cells from IL3 withdrawal induced death. Interestingly, the downstream signaling cascades were indistinguishable between the three kinases. Transplantation of murine bone marrow co-expressing MYC and PIM1, PIM2 or PIM3 caused rapid and uniformly lethal myeloid leukemia. De-induction of MYC 18 days following transplantation significantly increased the survival of mice, even with continual expression of PIM kinases. Alternatively, mice treated at the pre-leukemic stage with a PIM kinase inhibitor increased the lifespan of the mice, even with continual expression of the MYC transgene. These data demonstrate the role of PIM kinases in driving myeloid leukemia, and as candidate molecules for therapy against human malignancies.

Introduction: Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem marrow transplant (allo-HSCT), with rates ranging from 30% to 70%. Preventing GVHD without impairing the graft-versus-tumor effect remains an important goal for successful allo-HSCT. Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor that prevents T-cell activation, is commonly used as aGVHD prophylaxis. The influence of TAC has proved effective for preventing aGVHD after allo-HSCT. There is also variability in the serum concentrations of TAC and very little is known on the impact of early (first 4 weeks) TAC levels on aGVHD incidence. Given the immunologic events that lead to aGVHD, which occur within the first few days after transplant, we sought to assess whether early TAC levels were associated with aGVHD. Methods: Data were analyzed for 707 consecutive patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the Ohio State University between 2002- 2016. All patients received standard prophylaxis with TAC daily and methotrexate at a dose of 5mg/m2 on days +1, +3, +6, and +11 post allo-HSCT. Patients received anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) if receiving stem cells from an unrelated/mismatch related donor. The TAC target range was 5-12 ng/mL averaged over a 7-day period. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of aGVHD and its association with the mean weekly TAC levels. Secondary endpoints included incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse and overall survival (OS). Fine and Gray's proportional hazard models accounting for competing risks were used to evaluate the association between TAC levels and outcome of aGVHD, cGVHD and relapse. Cox proportional hazard models were used for the association with OS. Mean weekly TAC levels were included in the analyses as continuous variables and then divided into tertiles. A multivariable model adjusted for confounding factors. Results: Among the 707 patients, median age was 53 years (range: 19-75) and 60.7% were male. In all, 68% patients received reduced-intensity conditioning and the remaining 32% received myeloablative conditioning. The median age of donors was 34 years (range: 18-81) with 74.7% male. Of the donors, 36.9% were match related and 55.9% match unrelated. Peripheral blood was the stem cell source for 90.2% of the patients. A total of 449 (63.5%) patients received ATG. The diagnosis included acute myeloid leukemia (36.3%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (16.41%), myelodysplastic syndrome (11.7%), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11.88%). The mean weekly TAC concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 8.0, 9.7, 11.3 and 10.5 ng/mL, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD was 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 36%-43%) at day 100 and 45% (95% CI: 41%-48%) at day 180 post-transplant. In univariable analysis, high TAC level at week 1 was associated with lower grade II-IV aGVHD (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95%CI, 0.93-0.99; p = 0.006). We examined the effect of week 1 TAC levels categorized into tertiles (< 5.85, 5.85-8.95 and >8.95 ng/ml). Higher level of TAC (>8.95 ng/ml) was associated with lower risk of aGVHD (Figure 1a). In multivariable analysis, week 1 TAC levels > 5.85 ng/ml remained associated with a lower risk of grade II-IV aGVHD. However, only levels of 5.85-8.95 ng/ml were associated with statistically significant lower risk with HR=0.75 95% CI, 0.57-0.98; p=0.04 compared to the lower group (7.2 ng/ml (HR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.62-0.98; p=0.03). The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 41% (95% CI: 37%-44%) at 1 year post-allo-HSCT. Since GVHD is closely intertwined with the graft-versus-tumor effect, we examined whether early TAC levels influenced the risk of disease relapse. TAC levels at week 1 were not associated with relapse. However, week 2 TAC level >10.6 ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of relapse in multivariable analysis (HR, 1.37, CI, 1.01-1.85, p=0.043) (Figure 1b), after adjusting for confounding variables. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1, 3 and 5 year post allo-HSCT was 33%, 38% and 40%, respectively. TAC levels at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were not associated with OS. Conclusion: Achieving mean whole-blood level of tacrolimus between 6.0-9.0 ng/ml within the first week post-allogenic bone marrow transplantation may reduce the risk of aGVHD. Disclosures Rosko: Vyxeos: Other: Travel support. Vasu:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Clinical trial support. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. William:Techspert: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy. Mims:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brammer:Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Verastem, Inc: Research Funding. Saad:Actinium Pharma Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Kadmon: Other: Research Support; OrcaBio: Other: Research Support. Efebera:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Akcea: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria.

Introduction: NPM1 gene mutations are a common molecular aberration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the absence of concurrent high FLT3-ITD ratio mutations (>0.5), NPM1 mutations typically associate with higher complete remission (CR) rates following intensive induction chemotherapy. NPM1 mutations have been shown to be stable markers of persistent disease or impending relapse during CR or complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Given the clinical implications that persistent NPM1 mutations can have during CR/CRi, we used Deep Amplicon sequencing on CR/CRi bone marrow (BM) samples collected from adult de novoNPM1-mutated AML patients to determine the ability of NPM1 mutations at both a high and lower sensitivity next generation sequencing methods and also the presence of additional clonal abnormalities on relapse risk. Methods: We performed targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in addition to NPM1 Deep Amplicon sequencing on paired BM or blood samples collected from 38 newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated AML patients during CR/CRi after successful induction (1-2 courses of 7 + 3) and, if available, at relapse. NPM1 mutated NGS libraries were prepared using a KAPA HyperPlus Kit (Roche, Pleasanton, CA) and xGen Lockdown Probes (IDT, Coralville, IA). Libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). GATK's MuTect2 was used to perform variant calling. Variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off for the NGS panel was 0.05 (5%) with the exception of hotspot variants in IDH1 (R132) and IDH2 (R140) where variants detected to a level of 0.01 (1%) were included. The VAF cut off used for NPM1 Deep Amplicon sequencing was 0.00012 (0.012%). Results: Targeted NGS analysis and NPM1 Deep Amplicon sequencing had exceptional concordance at the level of detection of VAF= 0.05 (Figure 1). Of 38 patients, 23 patients had undetectable NPM1 mutations as analyzed through NPM1 Deep Amplicon sequencing of whom 9 (38.1%) relapsed. In contrast, 15 patients were positive by NPM1 Deep Amplicon sequencing and 9 (60%) relapsed. Only 4 patients had detectable persistent NPM1 mutations after induction according to both detection techniques and two of these relapsed. We next examined the potential impact of clearing both NPM1 mutation and co-occurring mutations together on relapses (Figure 2). A total of 15 patients cleared all of their clonal abnormalities and 5 (27%) relapsed. In contrast, of the 23 patients who did not clear the NPM1 mutation and/or another co-occurring mutation at remission, 14 (61%) have relapsed. Eleven of the relapsed patients had relapse samples available of whom all had persistent NPM1 mutation at this time. Paired CR/CRi and relapsed samples showed acquisition or recurrence of several other mutations, most notably FLT3-ITD, IDH1, and IDH2 which are all targetable with small molecule therapeutics. Conclusions: The use of Deep Amplicon sequencing to identify NPM1 mutations at a lower detection threshold compared to standard NGS techniques was more sensitive, but did not appear to fully inform relapse rates in NPM1-mutated AML patients after receipt of induction therapy. The appearance of other AML-associated mutations, identified together with NPM1 at time of remission, was more frequent among patients relapsing. These pilot data provide support for concurrent assessment of Deep Amplicon sequencing together with a broad standard NGS AML mutational assay to further enhance risk stratification of NPM1-mutated patients. Additionally, while NPM1 clones are present in all patients examined at the time of relapse, persistence or development of targetable clones justifies repeat broad NGS sequencing at this time. Figure Disclosures Bhatnagar: Novartis and Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cell Therapeutics, Inc.: Other: Research support; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Other: Research support. Mims:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Behbehani:Fluidigm corporation: Other: Travel funding. Byrd:Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S.

AML is a disease of the elderly. Patients aged ≥60 years (y) account for ~65% of all AML patients. However, while 40% of younger AML patients achieve long term survival, only 5-15% of older patients do. Especially given increasing availability of alternative treatment strategies the identification of patients who benefit from standard induction chemotherapy and those who do not is of crucial importance. The 2017 European LeukemiaNet Genetic Risk Classification (ELN GRC) provides guidance on genetic risk stratification of AML patients and is currently routinely used in clinical practice for both younger and older AML patients. The goal of our study was to test the performance of the 2017 ELN GRC in our cohort of 399 de novo AML patients aged ≥60 y (median: 69 y) which were similarly treated with cytarabine/daunorubicin-based chemotherapy on Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology protocols. Our cohort did not contain any patients with core-binding factor AML [i.e., with inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21)]. We also aimed to identify additional molecular prognosticators in older AML patients. Utilizing the 2017 ELN GRC, 31%, 25% and 44% of patients were classified as Favorable (Fav), Intermediate (Int) and Adverse (Adv) risk, respectively. The median CR rates of 81% for Fav risk, 55% for Int risk and 39% for Adv risk separated patients in accordance with the ELN GRC groups (P We next tested the prognostic impact of each 2017 ELN GRC marker in our patient cohort. Fav risk group patients with NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut) and either no FLT3-ITD or low FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (FLT3-ITDno/low) had a CR rate of 84%, while patients with biallelic CEBPAmut had a CR rate of only 54% (P=.02, Table 1). While 3y OS of NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDno/low was 31%, it was only 15% for patients with biallelic CEBPAmut (P=.13). Within Int risk patients the outcomes of NPM1mut patients with high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (FLT3-ITDhigh) and NPM1 wildtype (NPM1wt)/FLT3-ITDno/low patients were equally dismal, and actually resembled those of NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDhigh patients (Table 1). All other patients with gene mutations classified as ELN Adv risk had poor outcomes (Table 1). Thus, the only genetic classification in 2017 ELN GRC that associated with favorable outcome in AML patients ≥60 years was NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDno/low, while biallelic CEBPAmut patients resembled more Int risk patients. NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDhigh, NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDno/low andNPM1wt/FLT3-ITDhighpatients all had CR rates in line with Int risk, but very poor DFS and OS. To potentially refine criteria used to classify patients, we performed outcome analyses of mutations co-occurring with NPM1mut on CR, DFS and OS. In addition to the known adverse impact of FLT3-ITDhigh, presence of DNMT3Amut was also associated with lower CR and OS in NPM1mut (CR, 85 vs 32%, P Thus, with the exception of the small subsets of NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDno/low and patients harboring both NPM1mut/SRSF2mut all evaluated subsets of AML patients had 3-y DFS and OS rates of In summary, our data demonstrate the very poor DFS and OS of older AML patients treated with standard chemotherapy, despite the relatively high probability of achieving a CR. We show that the 2017 ELN GRC performs suboptimally to risk-stratify AML patients aged ≥60 years. NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDno/low status was the only current 2017 ELN GRC prognostic factor associated with improved outcomes in older AML patients. We identified NPM1/DNMT3A (which associated with shorter DFS+OS) and NPM1/SRSF2 (which associated with longer DFS+OS) as additional mutation combinations that might be useful for further group refinement. Disclosures Mims: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stone:Cornerstone Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Other: Fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board ; Astellas Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Celator Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ono Pharmaceutical-Theradex Oncology: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka-Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Fees for serving on a steering committee, and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Other: Fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board ; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Powell:Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wang:Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Other: Advisory role. Kolitz:Boeringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Byrd:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; Acerta: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding.

*equal contribution of AB, RLL, BD and JCB Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is common with increasing age, and older adults with AML rarely achieve long-term remission with chemotherapy. Gene discovery studies in older adults with AML have shown that this malignancy is characterized by a multitude of somatic genomic alterations beginning with initiating somatic events followed by acquisition of collaborative transforming mutations. Despite these important biologic insights, current therapeutic approaches to AML remain limited, particularly in adults ≥ 60 years of age. The Beat AML trial was designed to assess the feasibility of using genetic profiling to assign patients (pts) to molecularly defined, subtype-specific therapies within 7 days of the initial diagnosis in a multi-center clinical trial setting, and to delineate the role of molecularly informed first-line treatment of AML with mechanism based novel therapies. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with AML were enrolled in this prospective trial which offered accelerated cytogenetic and comprehensive mutational testing within 7 days followed by treatment assignment using these molecular data. Pt eligibility included age ≥ 60 years with non-APML AML, no known CNS leukemia, no prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy and no clinical need for emergent therapy. Eligible pts were profiled by local cytogenetics analysis and using a central next generation sequencing (NGS) assay (Foundation Medicine, Inc.) with all molecular data required for treatment assignment (TA) obtained < 7 days. TA was made centrally using a pre-determined algorithm considering somatic cytogenetic and molecular alterations in the dominant clone, available targeted therapeutics for specific AML subsets, and the likelihood of cure with intensive chemotherapy. Results: From November 2016 to January 2019, 487 pts with a suspected diagnosis of AML had enrolled at 14 clinical sites; 395 were eligible for the study (77% of the patients not eligible for the study had an alternative diagnosis). The median age of eligible patients was 72 years (range: 60 to 92) with 38% being≥ 75 years and 16% with treatment-related AML. From the 395 eligible patients, 374 (94.7%) were centrally assigned to the different cytogenetic/genomic groups within 7 days. The most common groups were TP53 mutated (19%) and marker negative (18%) molecular groups. The Beat AML trial is dynamic by design, thereby allowing different arms to open over time; all trial arms are designed to evaluate for substantial clinical efficacy in small, molecularly defined patient subsets. As shown in Figure 1, 224 patients (57%) had a TA and consented to a BEAT AML sub-study. Of the remaining 171 patients, 103 received standard therapy defined as induction therapy (7+3) or hypomethylation agent (25 before TA and 78 after TA), 28 received an alternative investigational agent (5 before TA and 23 after TA), 38 received palliative care, and 2 had an unknown treatment status and are grouped with the palliative care patients in subsequent analyses; 9 patients died before TA (2 who received standard therapy and 7 in the palliative care group). Demographic, clinical, performance and molecular characteristics were not largely different between pts who elected targeted therapy as part of the BEAT AML trial versus those who elected standard therapy. As shown in Figure 2, the overall survival was significantly longer for patients enrolled in a targeted therapy arm as part of the BEAT AML trial compared to those who elected standard therapy. (p Conclusion: Our data support the feasibility of a rapid precision medicine approach in older patients with previously untreated AML. Patients with AML who elected treatment assigned based upon cytogenetic and molecular alterations in the dominant clone using a novel precision medicine approach had significantly improved overall survival versus those who elected standard of care treatment. Disclosures Levine: Gilead: Consultancy; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Lilly: Honoraria. Mims:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Borate:Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Stein:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Baer:Takeda: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Stock:Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Research to Practice: Honoraria; UpToDate: Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deininger:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; TRM: Consultancy; Sangoma: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Adelphi: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humana: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sangamo: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blum:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Astellas,: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; AmerisourceBergen: Consultancy. Schiller:Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding. Olin:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lin:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Traer:AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Notable Labs: Equity Ownership. Odenike:AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; Oncotherapy: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; CTI/Baxalta: Research Funding. Arellano:Gilead: Consultancy. Vergilio:Roche Holding AG: Equity Ownership; Foundation Medicine: Employment. Brennan:Foundation Medicine: Employment. Vietz:Foundation Medicine: Employment. Druker:ALLCRON: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Aileron Therapeutics: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees , Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cepheid: Consultancy, Honoraria; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GRAIL: Equity Ownership, Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Patient True Talk: Consultancy; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (antibody royalty): Patents & Royalties: #2524, antibody royalty; Pfizer: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute license #2063, Monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10, exclusive commercial license to Merck & Co; OHSU (licensing fees): Patents & Royalties: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees ; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Biosciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beta Cat: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Beat AML LLC: Other: Service on joint steering committee; CureOne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; ICON: Other: Scientific Founder of Molecular MD, which was acquired by ICON in Feb. 2019; Monojul: Other: former consultant; Novartis: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Patents & Royalties: Patent 6958335, Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, exclusively licensed to Novartis, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding. Byrd:Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Background: PLX2853 is an orally available, non-benzodiazepine BET (bromodomain and extraterminal domain) inhibitor that exhibits low nanomolar potency and a modest preference for binding to the second bromodomain (BD2) of the BET proteins. By regulating genes (e.g. MYC and BCL2) critical to leukemic cell growth and survival, PLX2853 demonstrated broad anti-leukemic activity both as a single agent and in combination with other therapeutic agents in preclinical models. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in solid tumor patients revealed a short half-life (< 3 hour) enabling high peak plasma concentrations and nearly complete elimination from the plasma 9 hour post dose. Since strong and prolonged suppression of BET proteins have often untoward effects in normal tissues, the PLX2853 PK profile is hypothesized to be associated with improved tolerability by allowing transient target engagement followed by time for recovery after daily dosing. Methods: We are conducting an open-label, Phase 1b (Ph1b) study of PLX2853 as a single oral agent administered daily in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) using a modified continuous reassessment model (mCRM) with escalation with overdose control (EWOC) to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Up to 36 patients are expected to enroll. The dosing cycle and dose limiting toxicity window (DLT) is 21 days. Primary objectives include safety and PK. Secondary objectives include measures of preliminary efficacy, and exploratory objectives include pharmacodynamics (PD) biomarker assessments in various tissues. Enrollment through Cohort 2 (40 mg QD) is ongoing as of July 2019. Results: Five subjects with relapsed or refractory AML (median age 65 years) have received PLX2853 in escalating doses from 20 to 40 mg QD. Among these first 5 patients treated, the most common treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality in > 1 patient: decreased appetite (n=3), nausea (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), peripheral edema (n=2), cough (n=2), oropharyngeal pain (n=2), blood bilirubin increase (n=2), anemia (n=2), febrile neutropenia (n=2), fatigue (n=2), bacteremia (n=2), headache (n=2), dyspnea (n=2), and hypertension (n=2). Most were grade (G) 1-2. Treatment emergent AEs > G2 in > 1 patient included: anemia (n=2), febrile neutropenia (n=2) and hypertension (n=2). No treatment-related serious AEs or DLTs have been observed. Following a 20 mg daily dose of PLX2853, median time to reach maximal plasma concentrations (Tmax) is 1 hour and the absorption half-life (T1/2) is < 3 hours. Conclusions: In an ongoing Ph1b study, PLX2853 has now completed its first dosing cohort for patients with relapsed or refractory AML or high risk MDS, and no DLT has been observed yet. As dose escalation continues, PK, PD, preliminary safety and efficacy data will be assessed further to determine the clinical significance of target engagement. This clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03787498. Disclosures Pemmaraju: mustangbio: Consultancy, Research Funding; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; cellectis: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; plexxikon: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; sagerstrong: Research Funding; affymetrix: Research Funding; incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Borate:Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Solh:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:Polaris: Research Funding; Arvinas: Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Cantargia AB: Research Funding; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLine Rx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncoceutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Co.: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare AG: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; FTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Strategia Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BioTheryX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; NKarta: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy. DeZern:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Zhang:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Powell:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Severson:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Inokuchi:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Matusow:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Halladay:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Hsu:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Watkins:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Walling:Myovant Sciences: Consultancy; Nurix: Consultancy; Aduro Biotech: Consultancy; Plexxikon: Consultancy; CytomyX: Consultancy; Flag Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aminex: Consultancy; Immunext: Consultancy; SensenBio: Consultancy; Harpoon Therapeutics: Consultancy. Tsiatis:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Mims:PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Inherited predisposition to myeloid malignancies in adults may be more common than previously suggested with recent studies suggesting a prevalence of candidate predisposition alleles in 15-20% of patients. An inherited predisposition may not be considered in older AML patients despite significant clinical implications for family members as potential stem cell transplant donors. To better define the role of inherited genetic alterations in older AML patients , we analyzed a unique cohort of newly diagnosed older (>60 years) patients enrolled in) Beat AML® Master Trial(BAMT) for candidate genes associated with a known or putative inherited cancer predisposition. Methods: We analyzed extracted DNA from skin and/or saliva samples compared to paired leukemia samples of 176 AML patients enrolled in the BAMT. All samples underwent genomic profiling using a modified FoundationOne®Heme platform (capture-based) and/or the Oregon Health Sciences University panel (amplicon-based), evaluating 477 and 220 genes respectively, with a known role in hematologic malignancies. Germline(GL) variants were identified by the haplotype-based Bayesian genetic variant detector FreeBayes and using variant allele frequency(VAF) values. The pathogenicity and clinical significance of the variants was interpreted according to the 2015 ACMG/AMP guidelines while the AMP/CAP/ASCO guidelines and various disease databases were used in the somatic variant calls. Results: -The mutational landscape of the 176 newly diagnosed older AML patients is detailed in Table 1. Our cohort has a higher proportion of adverse risk patients, consistent with an older AML patient population. 27 pathogenic or likely pathogenic GL variants were detected in 24 AML patients, with a germline mutation prevalence of 14% in this cohort. Deleterious GL mutations were found in the gene DDX41 (5), followed by SBDS (4), CHEK2 (4), MPL (3), BRCA2 (2), HAX1 (2), DNAH9 (2), FANCA (1), FANCL (1), SAMD9 (1), BLM (1), and ATM (1) (Table 2). The types of mutations included missense mutations (9), nonsense mutations (8), frameshift mutations (7), splice site mutations (2), and an exonic deletion (1). Family history of leukemia was available on 129 patients from this cohort. 12 patients have at least one family member with AML. Of these 12 patients, 2 had a deleterious GL alteration identified. Along with the 14% prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic GL mutations , there were an additional 181 GL variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 102 patients, seen in genes implicated in inherited predisposition to hematologic malignancies, most commonly variants in DOCK8 and CREBBP(>5% VUS) with both genes being implicated in leukemogenesis . As skin and/or saliva samples were collected at the time of AML diagnosis, tumor-in-normal presence was expectedly observed. The median VAF for somatic mutations was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in skin (median 6%; mean 9%; standard deviation (SD) 10%; N=562 variants) than in saliva (median 17%; mean 21%; SD 16%; N=368 variants). In 37 patients who had both saliva and skin tissue concomitantly ,skin had a significantly lower tumor-in-normal presence (median VAF 5%, mean 8%, SD 8%;) than saliva (median 15%, mean 20%, SD 16%)(p < 0.0001). Conclusions: We found a prevalence of 14% pathogenic/ likely pathogenic GL mutations in cancer predisposition genes in this unique cohort of newly diagnosed older AML patients. This finding has potential clinical implications for patients and family members. We also found a large number of VUS in genes implicated in hematological malignancies. Additional studies linking candidate VUS' to familial predisposition to understand contribution to AML predisposition are needed. We are in the process of comparing the manual curation of ACMG classification of pathogenicity with a computational curation algorithm to assess the potential for automated classification of GL variants. Our study suggests the choice of source for germline DNA in patients with AML is variably impacted by leukemic contamination. Cultured skin fibroblasts are the current standard for tumor-normal paired genotyping, with the caveat of being labor intensive and not routinely performed in clinical diagnostic laboratories. This is a critical consideration for rapid GL screening of patients and family members with hematologic malignancies and suspected cancer predisposition. Disclosures Borate: Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Mims:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stein:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Baer:Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Stock:Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Schiller:Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Blum:AmerisourceBergen: Consultancy; Forma: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Astellas,: Research Funding. Shami:JSK Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Cantex: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lone Star Thiotherapies: Equity Ownership. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Byrd:Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Patents & Royalties: OSU-2S; BeiGene: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Druker:OHSU (licensing fees): Patents & Royalties: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees ; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; Novartis: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Patents & Royalties: Patent 6958335, Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, exclusively licensed to Novartis, Research Funding; Monojul: Other: former consultant; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; Beat AML LLC: Other: Service on joint steering committee; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute license #2063, Monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10, exclusive commercial license to Merck & Co; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (antibody royalty): Patents & Royalties: #2524, antibody royalty; Aileron Therapeutics: #2573, Constructs and cell lines harboring various mutations in TNK2 and PTPN11, licensing fees , Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ALLCRON: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Biosciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beta Cat: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Stock options; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Patient True Talk: Consultancy; GRAIL: Equity Ownership, Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board; Cepheid: Consultancy, Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: PI or co-investigator on clinical trial(s) funded via contract with OHSU., Research Funding; ICON: Other: Scientific Founder of Molecular MD, which was acquired by ICON in Feb. 2019; CureOne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Other: former member of Scientific Advisory Board. Vergilio:Foundation Medicine, Inc.: Employment; F. Hoffman La Roche, Ltd.: Equity Ownership. Levine:Imago Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Lilly: Honoraria; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy.