Search

Background: Single port access (SPA) surgery is a rapidly evolving field due to the complexity of NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery). SPA combines the cosmetic advantage of NOTES and possibility to perform surgical procedure with standard laparoscopic instruments. We report a technique of umbilical SPA cholecystectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments and complying with conventional surgical principle and technique of minimally invasive cholecystectomy. Methods: Preliminary, prospective experience of SPA cholecystectomy in 11 patients (median age, 46 (range, 27-63) years) scheduled for cholecystectomy was evaluated. Diagnoses for cholecystectomy were: symptomatic gallbladder lithiasis (n=7), previous acute cholecystitis (n=3), and biliary pancreatitis (n=1). Results: SPA cholecystectomy was feasible in all patients (median body mass index, 24 (range, 20-34) kg/m2) who were scheduled for preliminary experience using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Median operative time was 52 (range, 40-77) minutes. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in all patients, except one, and was considered normal. No peroperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Median hospital stay was less than 24 h. Conclusions: SPA cholecystectomy is feasible and seems to be safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. SPA cholecystectomy may be safer than the NOTES approach at this time. It has to be determined whether this approach would benefit patients, other than cosmesis, compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Single port access (SPA) surgery is a rapidly evolving field as it combines some of the cosmetic advantage of the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and allows performing surgical procedure with standard surgical instruments. We report in this paper a new technique of umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy with conventional surgical oncologic principle and technique of minimally invasive colectomy. Methods: Preliminary experience with umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy in a patient with degenerated ascending colon polyp. Results: Umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy was feasible with conventional laparoscopic instruments. Carcinologic surgical principle can be respected using this technique as pathological specimen had sufficient surgical margins (>10cm) and lymph nodes (33). Operative time was 158 min. No peroperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: SPA right hemicolectomy is feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. SPA right hemicolectomy may have the advantage over NOTES approach to offer the safety of laparoscopic colectomy especially for haemostasis and anastomosis. It has to be determined whether or not this approach would offer benefit to patients, except in cosmesis, compared to standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Aim: Postoperative ileus is an important factor of complications following gastrointestinal procedures. Its pathophysiology and the parameters, which may impact on its duration, remain unclear. The aim of this study was to measure the role of various clinical determinants on restoration of intestinal function after elective colorectal surgery. Methods: From July 2002 to September 2003, all patients who underwent laparotomy for colectomy (laparoscopic resections excluded) with either an ileotransverse, colocolic, or high colorectal anastomosis were entered in this prospective study. The intervals in hours between the end of the surgical procedure and passing of flatus (PG) and passing of stool (PS) were recorded by an independent investigator. PG and PS were eventually correlated with the following parameters: type of colectomy, early removal of nasogastric tube (NGT), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), type of underlying disease, systemic administration of opiates, and surgical training (colorectal fellowship or other). Results: One hundred twenty-four patients were entered in this study. Four patients (3.2%) developed septic complications (3 anastomotic leaks and 1 intraabdominal abscess) and were excluded from the analysis. Median age in this population was 68 (range 30-95) years. Mean duration of postoperative ileus was 70±28h (PG) and 99±34h (PS). The type of colectomy, underlying disease, MBP, and early NGT removal failed, in univariate analysis, to correlate with the duration of postoperative ileus. By contrast, time intervals PG and PS were statistically shorter in the group of patients treated by a colorectal surgeon [56±23 vs 74±28h (PG); 82±26 vs 103±35h (PS), p=0.004], as well as in patients who received systemic opiates for less than 2days [64±27 vs 75±28h (PG), p=0.04; 88±32 vs 108±33h (PS), p=001]. Conclusion: Restoration of normal intestinal function after elective open colectomy takes 3 (PG) to 4 (PS) days. In our series, specialized training in col

Background: Although still under development, single-port access (SPA) approach may be of interest in patients prone to port-side incisional hernia, ensuring absence of increased fascial incision. This forms the basis for evaluating SPA for prosthetic ventral hernia repair. We report a new SPA technique of ventral hernia repair using working-channel endoscope, standard laparoscopic instruments, and 10-mm port. Methods: Prospective experience with SPA prosthetic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia in 52 patients for 55 ventral hernias is presented. Median (range) patient age was 46 years (26-85 years), and BMI was 28kg/m2 (20-38kg/m2). Mean fascial defect was 16.2cm2 for primary hernia (n = 23) and 48.3cm2 for incisional hernia (n = 32). Intraperitoneal composite mesh repair was achieved through single 10-mm flank port using working-channel endoscope. Meshes were fixed using absorbable tackers and transfascial stitches. Results: SPA repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia was completed in all cases without conversion to standard laparoscopy. Median (range) operative time was 54min (39-95 min). Mesh size ranged from 118 to 500cm2. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded, except two seromas. Median (range) hospital stay was 1 day (1-5 days). One patient presented prolonged postoperative pain on mesh fixation that resolved after 3 months. No recurrence or port-site incisional hernias have been recorded at median (range) follow-up of 16 months (3-28 months). Conclusions: SPA prosthetic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia is easily feasible according to natural exposition by pneumoperitoneum and gravity. In the present series, SPA ventral hernia repair appears to be safe for experienced SPA surgeons. It may decrease parietal trauma and scarring in patients prone to incisional hernia. SPA repair may be associated with a decrease in rate of port-site incisional hernia compared with multiport laparoscopy, but this has to be veri

Background: Anastomotic dehiscence is the most severe surgical complication after large bowel resection. This study was designed to assess the incidence, to observe the consequences, and to identify the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Materials and methods: All procedures involving anastomoses of the colon or the rectum, which were performed between November 2002 and February 2006 in a single institution, were prospectively entered into a computerized database. Results: One thousand eighteen colorectal resections and 811 anastomoses were performed over this 40-month period. The most frequent procedures were sigmoid (276) and right colectomies (217). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.8%. The mortality rate associated with anastomotic leak was 12.9%. In univariate analysis, the following parameters were associated with an increased risk for anastomotic dehiscence: (1) ASA score ≥ 3 (p = 0.004), (2) prolonged (>3h) operative time (p = 0.02), (3) rectal location of the disease (p < 0.001), (4) and a body mass index > 25 (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, ASA score ≥ 3 (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.3, p < 0.001), operative time > 3h [OR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.0, p = 0.02), and rectal location of the disease (OR = 3.75; 95% CI 1.5-9.0 (vs left colon), p = 0.003; OR = 7.69; 95% CI 2.2-27.3 (vs right colon), p = 0.001] were factors significantly associated with a higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Conclusions: Three risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, one is patient-related (ASA score), one is disease-related (rectal location), the third being surgery-related (prolonged operative time). These factors should be considered in perioperative decision-making regarding defunctioning stoma formation

Background: Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy allows effective palliation and rapid recovery for the patient with limited survival due to advanced pancreatic cancer presenting with gastric outlet obstruction. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) offers excellent cosmetic results and may be associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced need for analgesia, and thus accelerated recovery. The authors report the first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy. Methods: Preliminary experience with transumbilical single-incision, intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy for a patient with gastric outlet obstruction caused by advanced pancreatic cancer is reported. Results: Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy was performed with a linear endoscopic stapler using an omega loop. The operative time was 117min. No intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomoses are feasible using the endoscopic linear stapler. Transumbilical single-incision gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction may improve cosmetic results and allow accelerated recovery for patients with limited survival. This anastomosis technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for other digestive tract procedures needs further evaluation

Background: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) are prospected as the future of minimally invasive surgery. While scarless surgery (NOTES and LESS) is gaining increasing popularity, perception of these approaches should be investigated. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire describing laparoscopy, LESS, and NOTES was given to medical staff (n=120), paramedical staff (n=100), surgical patients (n=100), and the general population (n=100). The survey participants (median age, 37 years; range, 18-81years) were queried about their expectations for surgical treatment and their approach preference. Results: The first concern of the survey responders was the risk of surgical complications (92%). When asked about the respective importance of surgical safety, cure, and cosmetics, cure was placed first by 74%, safety by 33%, and cosmetics by 3%. These results were not influenced by sex, age, prior surgery or endoscopy, or education. When operative risk was similar, 90% of the participants preferred a scarless approach (75% preferred LESS and 15% preferred NOTES) to laparoscopy. The scarless approach preference was significantly higher among the younger participants (age <40years; p=0.026), whereas sex showed no influence. The LESS preference was significantly higher among patients and the general population (86%) than among medical (67%) and paramedical (70%) staffs (p<0.001). A decreasing trend of preference for LESS and NOTES was observed with increased procedural risks. Conclusion: Although cure and safety remain the main concern, the population has a favorable perception of scarless surgery, even in the case of increased procedural risk, with LESS favored over NOTES. Such a popular adoption of scarless surgery should warrant the promotion of further research, technological innovations, and the establishment of surgeon training to improve its safety