Search

Background: The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) conducted a comprehensive review in 2021 to identify opportunities for enhancing the care of adult and pediatric patients with spasticity. A technical expert panel (TEP) was convened to develop consensus-based practice recommendations aimed at addressing gaps in spasticity care., Objective: To develop consensus-based practice recommendations to identify and address gaps in spasticity care., Methods: The Spasticity TEP engaged in a 16-month virtual meeting process, focusing on formulating search terms, refining research questions, and conducting a structured evidence review. Evidence quality was assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC), and a modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on recommendation statements and evidence grading. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) guided the rating of individual studies and the strength of recommendations., Results: The TEP approved five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management, with one recommendation unable to be graded due to evidence limitations. Best practices were defined as widely accepted components of care, while recommendations required structured evidence reviews and grading. The consensus guidance statement represents current best practices and evidence-based treatment options, intended for use by PM&R physicians caring for patients with spasticity., Conclusion: This consensus guidance provides clinicians with practical recommendations for spasticity assessment and management based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Clinical judgment should be exercised, and recommendations tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and risk profiles. The accompanying table summarizes the best practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management, reflecting principles with little controversy in care delivery., (© 2024 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Objective: Estimate the probability of met and unmet post-acute rehabilitative needs among pediatric patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)., Participants: One hundred and thirty children who received acute and post-acute rehabilitative services at a hospital for children., Methods: Prospective, observational study. Recommended service needs (1. Medical, 2. Psychological, 3. Cognitive/Educational, 4. Medically Based Therapies, 5. Community/Caregiver/Family Support) were collected at discharge and 1, 6, 12, and 18 months post-injury. Probabilities were estimated using nonlinear logistic regression models. The impact of age at discharge was also assessed., Results: Over time, the estimated probability of need for Medical, Medically Based Therapies, and Cognitive/Educational services were consistently high. Whereas unmet need for Medical and Medically Based Therapies were low, unmet need for Cognitive/Educational services were relatively high. Need for Psychological and Community/Caregiver/Family Support services increased in the months post-discharge, as did the probability of unmet need. Older age at discharge was associated with need for Psychological and Community/Caregiver Family Support services., Conclusions: Findings support the long-term monitoring of need for Psychological and Community/Caregiver/Family Support services among children with moderate to severe TBI. Future research to explore the etiology of unmet needs is warranted.

Purpose: The goal of prosthetic fitting is to provide comfort and functionality to the patient. It is thought that incorporating the use of standing anterior-posterior long leg radiographs (LLR) into the fitting of lower extremity prostheses will provide an objective guide when making adjustments, and be a better assessment of alignment. This study compares prosthetic alignment before and after radiography-guided adjustments., Method: This retrospective study was performed at a multidisciplinary amputee clinic on patients with congenital and/or acquired limb deficiencies. Their prosthetic alignment was evaluated by LLR and adjusted as needed. Satisfactory alignment was defined as a mechanical axis angular deviation of ≤1° and a leg length discrepancy of ≤10 mm., Results: A total of 45 unique prostheses from 24 subjects (10 female and 14 male) were included. Post-adjustment radiographs were obtained from 29 prostheses. After the initial prosthetic fitting, the probability of a satisfactory fit was 20.0 % (95 % CI 10.9-34.9 %). Following the baseline adjustment, the probability of a satisfactory fit improved to 53.3 % (95 % CI 37.5-70.9 %). After adjustment number 4, the probability of a satisfactory fit further improved to 76.7 % (95 % CI 41.9-98.0 %). There were also significant improvements in distal offset distance (p = 0.0040) and leg length discrepancy (p = 0.0206). The distal offset distance decreased by an average of 10.7 mm (95 % CI 3.6-17.8), and leg length discrepancy decreased by an average of 3.0 mm (95 % CI 00.48-5.5)., Conclusions: The addition of LLRs to existing fitting methods significantly improves prosthetic alignment and length.