Search

Introduction: Preoperative diagnostic protocols vary worldwide, some prioritizing safety while others question routine procedures. Building on prior research, this study explores the impact of diverse preoperative findings on bariatric management and procedure selection. Methods: In a retrospective analysis of prospective data of over 1000 bariatric surgery patients from January 2017 to December 2022 undergoing primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were analyzed. Preoperative assessment included upper endoscopy, upper GI series, and esophageal manometry. Sonography data were excluded. The primary endpoint examined the influence of preoperative exams on procedure selection, the secondary endpoint evaluated their therapeutic impact. Results: 897 patients (741 RYGB, 156 SG) were included. All underwent upper endoscopy, revealing common findings such as type C gastritis and reflux esophagitis. Upper endoscopy prompted a therapeutic consequence in 216 patients (24.3%), resulting in a number needed to screen (NNS) of 4.1. Upper GI series and manometry were more frequently performed before LSG. Upper GI series detected hiatal hernias and motility disorders but did not result in any change of procedures. Esophageal manometry found pathologies in 37 (25.3%) patients rising to 41.5% if symptoms were present. Overall, 16 (1.8%) patients experienced a change in the planned procedure, with 14 changes prompted by preoperative findings and two by technical difficulties. Conclusion: We advise routine upper endoscopies for all patients undergoing LRYGB or LSG, while reserving upper GI series only for selected cases. Manometry should be exclusively performed on symptomatic patients undergoing LSG, ensuring a balanced and individualized preoperative assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstarct: BACKGROUND: Early recurrence after esophagectomy is often used as a surrogate for aggressive tumor biology and treatment failure. However, there is no standardized definition of early recurrence, and predictors for early recurrence are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to define an evidence-based cutoff to discriminate early and late recurrence and assess the influence of neoadjuvant treatment modalities for patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal-junction adenocarcinoma (EAC)., Patients and Methods: This dual-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent esophagectomy for stage II-III EAC after neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) or radiochemotherapy according to the Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) protocol from 2012 to 2022. The optimal cutoff for early versus late recurrence was calculated by using the most significant difference in survival after recurrence (SAR). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with early recurrence., Results: Of 334 included patients, 160 (47.9%) were diagnosed with recurrence. Most patients had systemic (60.5%) or multiple sites of recurrence (21.1%), whereas local-only recurrence (9.2%) and carcinomatosis (9.2%) were rare. The optimal interval between surgery and recurrence for distinguishing early and late recurrence was 18 months (median SAR: 9.1 versus 17.8 months, p = 0.039) with only 24% of recurrences diagnosed after the calculated cutoff. Advanced pathologic tumor infiltration (ypT3-4, p = 0.006), nodal positivity (p = 0.013), poor treatment response (>10% residual tumor, p = 0.015), and no adjuvant treatment (p = 0.048) predicted early recurrence., Conclusion: Early recurrence can be defined as recurrent disease within 18 months. Hallmarks for early recurrence are poor response to neoadjuvant therapy with persisting advanced disease. In those patients, adjuvant therapy and closer follow-up should be considered., Competing Interests: Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interest for any authors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Early recurrence in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poorly defined. Predictors are lacking and needed for patient counseling, risk stratification, and postoperative management. This study aimed to define and predict early recurrence for patients in resected IPMN-derived PDAC and guide management., Methods: A lowest p value for survival after recurrence (SAR) was used to define early recurrence in resected IPMN-derived PDAC from five international centers. Overall survival (OS) and SAR were compared using log-rank tests. A multivariable logistic regression identified odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for early recurrence. Rounded ORs were used to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups using upper and lower quartile score distributions. Adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed by Cox regression and log-rank tests for OS in risk groups., Results: Recurrence developed in 160 (42 %) of 381 patients. Early recurrence was defined at 10.5 months and observed in 61 patients (38 % of recurrences). The median SAR for the patients with early recurrence was 8.3 months (95 % CI, 3.1-16.1 months) compared with 12.9 months (95 % CI, 5.2-27.5 months) for the patients with late recurrence. The independent predictors of early recurrence were CA19-9 (OR, 3.80; 95 % CI, 1.54-9.41) and N2 disease (OR, 7.29; 95 % CI, 3.22-16.49). The early recurrence rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were respectively 1 %, 14 %, and 32 %. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS only for the high-risk patients (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.79)., Conclusion: In IPMN-derived PDAC, the optimal cutoff for early recurrence is 10.5 months. Both CA19-9 and N stage predict early recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with survival benefit only for high-risk patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: There are no conflicts of interest., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) presents a global health challenge characterized by cardiometabolic risk factors like central obesity, elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and high fasting glucose levels. Despite lifestyle interventions and medications, the increasing prevalence of MetS calls for effective treatments. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as a promising intervention. This review examines the role of SG in improving MetS outcomes, drawing from a PubMed/Medline literature search. It highlights SG's multifaceted metabolic effects, including hormonal changes and improved insulin sensitivity, contributing to improved metabolic outcomes. Additionally, SG leads to significant weight loss and effectively addresses comorbidities like hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with low rates of early morbidity and mortality. However, long-term studies indicate that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) provides more sustained weight loss and superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities, whereas SG is associated with fewer early complications and a lower risk of nutritional deficiencies. In conclusion, SG offers a valuable option for managing MetS, providing significant weight loss and comorbidity improvement. Nevertheless, potential long-term complications, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and suboptimal weight response, emphasize careful patient selection and monitoring., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Informed consent: Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers., Summary Background Data: RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared., Results: The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications., Conclusion: Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists. No grants and financial support were received for this study., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The risk for recurrence in patients with distal gastric cancer can be reduced by surgical radicality. However, dispute exists about the value of the proposed minimum proximal margin distance (PMD). Here, we assess the prognostic value of the safety distance between the proximal resection margin and the tumor., Patients and Methods: This is a single-center cohort study of patients undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (2001-2021). Cohorts were defined by adequacy of the PMD according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines (≥ 5 cm for intestinal and ≥ 8 cm for diffuse Laurén's subtypes). Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were assessed by log-rank and multivariable Cox-regression analyses., Results: Of 176 patients, 70 (39.8%) had a sufficient PMD. An adequate PMD was associated with cancer of the intestinal subtype (67% vs. 45%, p = 0.010). Estimated 5-year survival was 63% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51-78] and 62% (95% CI 53-73) for adequate and inadequate PMD, respectively. Overall, an adequate PMD was not prognostic for OS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.38) in the multivariable analysis. However, in patients with diffuse subtype, an adequate PMD was associated with improved oncological outcomes (median OS not reached versus 131 months, p = 0.038, median TTP not reached versus 88.0 months, p = 0.003)., Conclusion: Patients with diffuse gastric cancer are at greater risk to undergo resection with an inadequate PMD, which in those patients is associated with worse oncological outcomes. For the intestinal subtype, there was no prognostic association with PMD, indicating that a distal gastrectomy with partial preservation of the gastric function may also be feasible in the setting where an extensive PMD is not achievable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To investigate the impact of total pancreatectomy (TP) on oncological outcomes for patients at high-risk of local recurrence or secondary progression in the remnant gland after partial pancreatectomy (PP) for IPMN-associated cancer., Summary Background Data: Major risk factors for invasive progression in the remnant gland include multifocality, diffuse main duct dilation, and the presence of invasive cancer. In these high-risk patients, a TP may be oncologically beneficial. However, current guidelines discourage TP, especially in elderly patients., Methods: This international multicenter study compares TP versus PP in patients with adenocarcinoma arising from multifocal or diffuse IPMN (2002-2022). Log-rank test and multivariable Cox-analysis with interaction analysis was performed to assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local-DFS., Results: Of 359 included patients, 162 (45%) were treated with TP, whereas 197 (55%) underwent PP. Despite TP and PP having similar R0-rates (59% vs. 58%, P=0.866), patients undergoing a TP had significantly longer local-DFS compared to PP (P=0.039). However, no difference in OS was observed between the two surgical approaches (P=0.487). In a multivariable analysis, young age (optimal cut-off ≤63.6 yrs) was associated with an OS benefit derived from TP (HR:0.44, 95%CI:0.22-0.89), whereas no significant difference was observed in elderly patients (HR:1.24, 95%CI:0.92-1.67, Pinteraction=0.007)., Conclusion: Since overall, patients with diffuse or multifocal IPMN with an invasive component do not benefit from TP in terms of OS, the indication for TP may be individualized to young patients who have sufficient life expectancy to benefit from the prevention of secondary progression or local recurrence., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared. Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the prognostic impact of margin status in patients with resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to inform future intraoperative decision-making on handling differing degrees of dysplasia on frozen section., Summary Background Data: The ideal oncologic surgical outcome is a negative transection margin with normal pancreatic epithelium left behind. However, the prognostic significance of reresecting certain degrees of dysplasia or invasive cancer at the pancreatic neck margin during pancreatectomy for IPMN-derived PDAC is debatable., Methods: Consecutive patients with resected and histologically confirmed IPMN-derived PDAC (2002-2022) from six international high-volume centers were included. The prognostic relevance of a positive resection margin (R1) and degrees of dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin were assessed by log-rank test and multivariable Cox-regression for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)., Results: Overall, 832 patients with IPMN-derived PDAC were included with 322 patients (39%) having an R1-resection on final pathology. Median OS (mOS) was significantly longer in patients with an R0 status compared to those with an R1 status (65.8 vs. 26.3 mo P<0.001). Patients without dysplasia at the pancreatic neck margin had similar OS compared to those with low-grade dysplasia (mOS: 78.8 vs. 66.8 months, P=0.344). However, high-grade dysplasia (mOS: 26.1 mo, P=0.001) and invasive cancer (mOS: 25.0 mo, P<0.001) were associated with significantly worse OS compared to no or low-grade dysplasia. Patients who underwent conversion of high-risk margins (high-grade or invasive cancer) to a low-risk margin (low-grade or no dysplasia) after intraoperative frozen section had significantly superior OS compared to those with a high-risk neck margin on final pathology (mOS: 76.9 vs. 26.1 mo P<0.001)., Conclusions: In IPMN-derived PDAC, normal epithelium or low-grade dysplasia at the neck have similar outcomes while pancreatic neck margins with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer are associated with poorer outcomes. Conversion of a high-risk to low-risk margin after intraoperative frozen section is associated with survival benefit and should be performed when feasible., Competing Interests: Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors.Funding: Joseph R. Habib is supported by the NIH T32 grant T32CA193111. Ingmar F. Rompen is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, grant number 217684). This work was also supported by the Ben and Rose Cole Charitable PRIA Foundation., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metabolic surgery for obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) yields short- and long-term remission rates of 60-90%. Its effects on diabetesassociated complications such as neuropathy and nephropathy have not been well studied to date. Hardly any data are available on this subject with respect to moderately obese patients (body mass index [BMI] 25-35 kg/m2) with insulin-dependent T2D. Our previous studies suggest that, in such patients, treatment with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) improves diabetic neuropathy. In this pilot study, we investigate the course of diabetic nephropathy after RYGB surgery., Methods: 20 insulin-dependent patients whose T2D was inadequately controlled with medication, and whose BMI was in the range 25-35 kg/m2, were prospectively included in a pilot study. All patients underwent a standardized RYGB operation. Blood and urine tests for renal function were performed before surgery and 12 and 24 months afterward., Results: The serum creatinine level fell from 0.82 ± 0.23 to 0.69 ± 0.13 mg/dL (p = 0.0025) in the first 12 months after surgery and was unchanged a further 12 months later. The glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rose in the first 24 months after surgery from 96.4 ± 28.7 to 111.7 ± 23.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.0093). The urinary albumin/creatinine and high-molecular-weight adiponectin/creatinine ratios fell markedly in the first 24 months after surgery (2.89 ± 3.14 versus 1.00 ± 0.24 mg/mmol [p = 0.0491] and 0.18 ± 0.06 versus 0.04 ± 0.01 μg/g [p = 0.0392])., Conclusion: RYGB has positive effects on renal function and may therefore be a good treatment option for moderately obese, insulin-dependent patients whose T2D cannot be adequately controlled with medication. These results still need to be confirmed in randomized, controlled trials with longer periods of followup.