Search

The relevance of the study is related to the need for a theoretical and legal characterization of environmental justice as a legal phenomenon, as well as the development of a legal mechanism for its establishment in order to implement the principle of sustainable development. The dialectical method, methods of analysis, concretization, idealization, comparison, historical and other methods were used to achieve the purpose of the study. The paper reveals the essence of environmental justice as an advanced concept of society development. The ideology of environmental justice is based on equal access of people to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, which is equated to the right to an environment that is safe for life and health in Ukrainian legislation. The paper pays special attention to the study of the phenomenon of sacrifice zones, approaches to their understanding and characteristics. In the context of long-term hostilities in Ukraine, the combination of traditional (consequences of economic activity) and new (consequences of hostilities) environmental hazards, complex types of sacrifice zones (military impact zones) appear. The features of military impact zone are proposed to include the following: it involves other types of sacrifice zones; it "absorbs" nature reserves and other protected areas; ongoing hostilities, the presence of mines and other explosive objects hinder the implementation of environmental policy goals. Social payments (both temporary and permanent) can be a means of partial implementation of the principle of environmental justice for the population living in sacrifice zones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Amazonia Investiga is the property of PRIMMATE and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: The aim of the current research is to study the sociological and, of course, emic and qualitative approach of the life experience of women in Tehran after divorce. Method: The methodology of the current qualitative research was carried out using the grounded theory strategy. For this purpose, in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 divorced women in Tehran, who were selected by the purposeful sampling method and snowball strategy, during more than 8 months. The interviews continued until the theoretical saturation stage. Data analysis was done through open, central and selective coding system and finally the core category was extracted. Findings: In the open coding stage, 155 open codes, 33 central codes, 7 main categories and one core category were extracted from the data coding system: Life of children of divorce: double victory and failure, reaching forgotten individuality, desire and experience The images of riotous pleasures, the lack of pleasant experience of returning to the father's house, economic challenges (hardship), diversification of negative attention (sexual and instrumental), a conceptual framework of the stigma of divorce, multifaceted rejection. Also, "actualized dualism: from the experience of hardship to modern individuality" was chosen as the core category and finally a tree diagram extracted from the data was prepared. Discussion: Life after divorce, at least at first glance, is an experience of the life of divorced women, which cannot be easily explained. Positive and negative dialectical relationship is the result of life after divorce. In fact, life after divorce for women can be likened to a drama show, watching the leading situation is a contradictory flow of good and bad affairs and inadequacy in the forecast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of Improvement Science (IS) for the dissertation in practice (DiP) must be encouraged because the questions and concerns addressed in these projects go beyond answering basic research. Authors of dissertations in practice will bring philosophical assumptions, select research designs, and situate themselves somewhere along the practitioner continuum. DiP authors should be aware of the larger philosophical questions relating to the ontological, epistemological, methodological, axiological, and rhetorical grounding of Improvement Science. Grounded in these large philosophical questions, the Improvement Science project should be identified as a metaparadigm and counted among other research methodological paradigms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper seeks to examine Du Bois' positive engagement with the Marxist dialectical categories that are the corner-stone of the politico-philosophical tradition, as in Berteli Oilman's Dance of The Dialectic and Fredrich Engels' Anti-Duhring. Du Bois' relationship to Marxism remains downplayed and understudied due to anti-communist historiography and postmodernist interpretations. W. E. B. Du Bois' 1939 work Black Folk, Then and Now demonstrates the centrality of Marxist dialectics to his work, clarifying his philosophical and historiographical development after completing Black Reconstruction. This abstract and philosophical reading of Black Folk, Then and Now reveals not merely that the late Du Bois' radicalism can be categorized as Marxian but also that his late works cannot be understood without an understanding of Marxist political economy and philosophy, revealing that Black Folk, Then and Now is a centerpiece of the scholar-activist's intellectual development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Geological Journal / Geologìcnij žurnal / Geologiceskij žurnal / Heolohichnyi Zhurnal is the property of Institute of Geological Sciences, NAS of Ukraine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this paper I contrast different versions of Greek rhetoric that in the late Hellenistic period were exported to Rome by both rhetoricians and philosophers, and show how with regard to Roman law these versions differed in aim and in application. With regard to the application in law, I argue that in Rome's unique practice of resolving disputes between citizens – i.e. done with the help of specialists – the Stoic conception of rhetoric as the longer, explanatory version of dialectic, aiming at what is correct and true, was useful in conveying the correct answer to non-specialists, the judge included, whereas the Academics', and more specifically Philo of Larissa's, conception of rhetoric, aiming at what is verisimilar, is above all useful in the public realm, that is in political and forensic speeches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From time immemorial, science and scientific theories have been in progress. This is so because since the creation of the universe mankind has been faced with multifaceted problems that require authentic solutions. To this end, many theories have kept on springing up in order to proffer solutions to those problems. Put in another way, so many theories have been expounded, all in a bid to take care of problems of mankind. However, these theories have given rise to such questions as; how do we account for scientific theories? How do we account for the truth and certainty of these theories? What method leads to scientific progress? In their various philosophies of science, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend and Imre Lakatos gave their account of the part to scientific progress. This study employs the method of Hermeneutics to explore the dialectical nature of those various accounts of scientific progress. The study highlights that the part to scientific progress is not a one way traffic endeavor; it involves some forms of dialectics in the sense that theories are contradicted and opposed. This contradiction and opposition in turn bring out the best in such theories or even give rise to a new superior theory. This study recommends that scientists and seekers of knowledge should equip themselves with the knowledge of the dialectical nature of science. When this is done, science would no doubt be immune from conventionalism and stereotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy / Revue Canadienne de Philosophie Continentale is the property of Canadian Society for Continental Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper aims to further explore the potentiality of integrating key insights from virtue argumentation theory into pragma-dialectics to establish a virtuous pragma-dialectics. Drawing methodological inspiration from Gascón's work, this paper introduces the "conditions-implications framework." Firstly, it argues that virtues offer novel perspectives on the second-order conditions of critical discussion. Specifically, it illustrates that excessive emotional attachment and identity prejudice hinder the reasonable engagement of arguers at both individual and socio-cultural levels, and virtues play a pivotal role in overcoming these irrational factors. Furthermore, integrating virtue insights into pragma-dialectics leads to two important theoretical implications: (1) an expanded fallacy theory—revealing the connection between argumentative vices and fallacies, expanding fallacies from a unilateral to a bilateral issue; (2) an expanded strategic maneuvering theory—virtue contributes to maintaining the delicate balance between dialectical reasonableness and rhetorical effectiveness. The virtue approach is anticipated to act as a facilitator rather than an obstruction to the future advancement of pragma-dialectics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Al-Academy is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Arabian Sciences Heritage is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this essay the author describes some of the transformations that occur as one moves from preverbal functioning to verbally symbolic language. In preverbal experience, there is a direct connection between the sign and what is signified. An infant or child signifies displeasure by throwing his food or other objects to the floor. Much of the emotional tie between mother and infant and patient and analyst is communicated in this way. When a transformation occurs from preverbal to verbally symbolic language, as occurs in early development and as one interprets a dream, meaning is not merely translated, meaning is created. On acquiring verbally symbolic language, a "space" mediated by an interpreting subject opens between the symbol (for instance, the word guilt) and the symbolized (the experience of guilt) and a new subjectivity is created. On entry into verbally symbolic language, one becomes able to experience oneself in a qualitatively different way; one becomes both subject and object, I and me; one becomes able to experience a far broader range of feelings and types of thinking. Helen Keller's account of her experience of acquiring verbally symbolic language is drawn upon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Brazilian Business Law Journal / Administração de Empresas em Revista is the property of Administracao de Empresas em Revista and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This essay advocates for a form of dialectic-speculative rationality modeled on Hegel’s view of dialectic and speculation as the most adequate “method” to address the philosophical problem of understanding the complexities of today’s world.

The present article aims at providing some clarification on the Horkheimer-Neurath 1937 debate, so as to make three main claims: (a) around 1937 (even though perhaps neither in the early 1930s, at the time of his review of Mannheim’s Ideology and Utopia, nor after the Second World War, at the time of Adorno’s disenchanted statement, “the whole is the false”), Horkheimer belonged to the Hegelian-Marxist tradition stemming from Lukács’s History and Class Conscioussness (1923); (b) notwithstanding Neurath’s semantic and epistemological holism, his fallibilism, his rejection of Wertfreiheit in the social sciences, his commitment to socialism, there is still a gulf between his position and Horkheimer’s, for Neurath did not accept the main methodological claim made by the latter, namely, the Lukács-inspired view that what “constitutes the decisive difference between Marxism and bourgeois thought” is the Hegelian “point of view of totality”; (c) highlighting the main differences between Neurath’s and Lukács’s versions of Marxism – one concerning the very idea of dialectic, and the other concerning the epistemic privilege of the proletariat – can throw some light on and help understand better the distinctive features of Lukács’s Hegelianization of Marxism.

ABSTRACT The best‐performing AI systems, such as deep neural networks, tend to be the ones that are most difficult to control and understand. For this reason, scholars worry that the use of AI would lead to so‐called responsibility gaps, that is, situations in which no one is morally responsible for the harm caused by AI, because no one satisfies the so‐called control condition and epistemic condition of moral responsibility. In this article, I acknowledge that there is a significant challenge around responsibility and AI. Yet I don't think that this challenge is best captured in terms of a responsibility gap. Instead, I argue for the opposite view, namely that there is responsibility abundance, that is, a situation in which numerous agents are responsible for the harm caused by AI, and that the challenge comes from the difficulties of dealing with such abundance in practice. I conclude by arguing that reframing the challenge in this way offers distinct dialectic and theoretical advantages, promising to help overcome some obstacles in the current debate surrounding ‘responsibility gaps’. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study aimed to compare Heidegger's and Āl-e-Ahmad's views on technology; first, the close relationship between subjectivism and modern technology was analyzed based on Heidegger, and subsequently, it was pointed out that Heidegger's approach towards technology is a critical confrontation based on engagement/disengagement dialectics. Then Jalal Āl-e-Ahmad's view on technology was analyzed, emphasizing that, unlike Heidegger, with a philosophical, ontological, and anticipatory approach to modern technology, Āl-e-Ahmad took a selective and voluntarist approach towards modern technology by adopting a political and social stance. Āl-e-Ahmad, like Promethean and leading intellectuals and reformers, believed that a Westoxificated society is a society that has not yet achieved technology and is technologically dependent on the West. Therefore, to deal with Westoxification, it should become a technological power by adopting a will-based approach--a machine must be built and owned; however, at the same time, one should not be got caught by the machine because it is a means and not a goal. Unlike Āl-e-Ahmad, Heidegger considered technology not a mere tool but a kind of ontology and way of thinking that affects all humans' areas and affairs, so it is not easy to escape modern technology's grip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 'spatial fix' has been central to economic geography for nearly 50 years, examining capitalist development through both stability and change. Harvey's original conceptions of the fix prioritised capital's capacity to fix space to accumulate and forestall crisis. We continue this by considering the ' socio -spatial fix', allowing closer investigation of who makes the landscapes of capitalism, and how actor choices and actor inter- and intra-relationships forestall crises of accumulation. We show how crisis, time and actors are central to making and re-making socio-spatial fixes and in turn to understanding both the socio-spatial dialectic and the spatial fix. Empirically, we compare two remote but globally networked mining towns, Kiruna, Sweden and Newman, Australia. Mining towns are rewarding case-studies because capital's relative immobility and the dominance of a single industry make strikingly clear how both production and social reproduction are remade. We enrich general theorisations in three ways, by explaining: first, how crisis-threatening events require renegotiation of socio-spatial arrangements; second, how time and timing are critical in remaking fixes; third, how actor agency and heterogeneity are central because the actors who make fixes change over time and are in complex relationships with each other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Images of childhood have a pivotal place in the writings of both Sigmund Freud and Walter Benjamin. The present paper offers a discussion on the subject of childhood memories that embody a return to infantile experience both in content and in form mainly in the form of visual images. Freud's visual image (visuelles Bild) and Walter Benjamin's Denkbild (thought-image) present a dialectic between a condensed experience of the past and the inevitable transformation of experience into language. Childhood memories are not necessarily retrieved as realistic events but rather embody the potential to create new experiences in the present of remembrance which are merely referred to the past. These notions are examined through a psychoanalytic reading of Benjamin's Berlin Childhood around 1900 (2002 [1938]). This memoir is constructed through a singular collection of Denkbilder that presents the experience of being a child in the city of Berlin around 1900. It expresses a lamentation by the author and on behalf of his Jewish generation for the abyss in which they found themselves in the face of the rise of the Nazi regime. The present reading will focus on three main themes: replacements for the original in modern society images of childhood as prefigurations of later developments and translations from images to words as vital transformations especially in times of turmoil. [End Page 367] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this text is to observe how Hegel identifies, in the concept of 'objective humor', the fundamental poetic trait to be considered in the 'sensible-spiritual formation' of a culture divided and supposedly confused by relativisms of all kinds: modernity. To this end, the text is divided into three parts. In the first part, we will briefly look at the position, purpose, and meaning of art in general as a selfconscious exercise and the highest expression of the 'sensible freedom' of the modern Geist. In the second, we will explore the Hegelian meaning of 'objective humor' to identify the advantages of the poetic genre in distinguishing between the supposedly true and false contents of the spirit in art. Finally, in the third part, we will examine Hegel's interpretation of Goethe's poem 'Reencounter' [Wiederfinden] to illustrate the relevance of speculative dialectics for understanding the Hegelian concept of art and, conversely, the relevance of art for understanding dialectics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The text introduces a translation of Ilyenkov's famous text "On the State of Philosophy," which was meant as a letter to the Central Committee of the CPSU and expressed his exasperation with the development of Soviet philosophy. In our introduction, we describe the historical context of the emergence of the letter, including the main changes in Soviet philosophy in the 1960s (esp. rise in popularity of cybernetics), and the institutional details of Ilyenkov's biography. We point to the contemporary relevance of the letter by emphasizing how Ilyenkov's dialectical account of science can enrich contemporary discussions in the sociology of science and STS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evald Ilyenkov's last book, Leninist Dialectics and the Metaphysics of Positivism, was published in 1980 shortly after the author's tragic demise. In it he celebrated the 70th anniversary of Lenin's still controversial Materialism and Empirio-criticism (1909). Like Lenin's own book, this final contribution by Ilyenkov is often dismissed as mere polemic. But as Lev Naumenko noted in the original preface: "the fires of the ideological struggle have not weakened". Under the protective shield of "Leniniana", as Lev Naumov called it, Ilyenkov set out his approach to materialist dialectics as both the science of logic and the logic of revolution. I discuss the nature of Ilyenkov's motives, the place of Leninist Dialectics within his philosophical oeuvre and why the original manuscript was censored by the Politizdat publishers. I draw on memoirs by Ilyenkov's close colleague and friend Felix Mikhailov and intended co-author, Grigori Vodolazov. Their testimonies make evident that Ilyenkov's challenge to the myth of "two Lenins" was a thinly disguised attack on the technocratic anti-humanistic ideology that prevailed in the late 1970s Soviet Union. I propose that Lenin was inspired by Hegel's dialectic throughout his life through Russian writers as well as Marx and Engels. Ilyenkov explains how Lenin's EmpirioCriticism embodied dialectical concepts that cannot be described as crude materialism. Finally I suggest that Ilyenkov's cri de coeur still stands as a call to the future as a foundation demanding further exploration towards a contemporary theory of knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article offers a detailed analysis of Ilyenkov's conception of the relationship between the logical and the historical. It posits that Ilyenkov, by overcoming the theoretical impasses of mainstream Soviet Marxism, was the first thinker to recognize the centrality of this relationship in dialectics. Through a brief overview of the official conception of Diamat, I explain that the latter broadly understood the relation of the logical and the historical in a rather superficial way. I then argue that Ilyenkov's approach to dialectics as the ascent from the abstract to the concrete, combined with his research orientation towards the method of Marx's Capital and his reevaluation of Hegel's philosophy led him to a much deeper understanding of the inner unity of the method of ascent from the abstract to the concrete and the relation of the logical and the historical. In reconstructing Ilyenkov's analysis on this matter, I explain how the unfolding of the categories throughout the ascent from the abstract to the concrete is inextricably intertwined with the relation of the logical and the historical. Therefore, the article concludes by arguing that Ilyenkov's analysis marks a significant advance in the understanding of dialectics in the history of Marxism, and a core aspect of this deeper understanding is his systematic approach to the relationship of the logical and the historical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article first resumes up-to-date conceptualisations of the superego in psychoanalytic theory, stretching from the superegoic sense of guilt (Freud) up to the superego as an "imperative od jouissance" (Lacan), and at the same time as an imperative of transgression insofar as enjoyment is by definition based upon transgression of the law. Against this background, the article develops another conceptualisation of the superego, which consist in the completion of the superegoic dialectics of "dirty and necessary" in perversion. This conception is based upon perverse self-instrumentalisation of the subject, which transforms the "dirtiness" of subjective enjoyment and transgression into their necessity. The article then moves toward the analysis of how especially this new conceptualisation of the superego manifests itself in the popular crime series Chicago Police Department (CPD), and in some logically and structurally similar phenomena, which occurred during Donald Trump's presidency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article, the result of PIBIC research, aims to problematize issues related to post-humanism based on the film Transcendence, 2014. The examination of this issue presents us with a reality in which the cyborg and its construction as a social being is present in our daily lives. Our approach to this study is based on the dialog between the theory of the posthuman and cinema, through the dialectical method. Seeking reflections and being based on theorists such as Maia (2017), Haraway (2009), Zaboli (2016), Nietzsche (2008), among others. In this sense, our work also seeks to understand the process of hybridization that has been taking place over the years, enhancing improvements to the human body, and thus providing transhuman effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evil is the result of moral conflicts between two selfaware people who have different moral values. A self-aware person always seeks to actualize his freedom. According to Hegel, the realization of freedom comes with evil. So, the purpose of this article is to explain the question of evil and examine its connection with the concept of freedom in the first place, it seems that evil is the negation of human freedom, while the existence of evil is necessary to achieve freedom as a human goal. Everyone, whenever he seeks to achieve freedom, should not pay attention to his inner institution to establish law in order to make himself known to others. Therefore, the purity of the heart preserves itself, in this way, it suffers hypocrisy, and the result of this hypocrisy is nothing but the appearance of evil. According to Hegel's thought, when choosing the beautiful soul or evil, everyone chooses the latter, in order to guide rationality to its ultimate goal, which is freedom. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article analyzes various facets of self-image, starting from the dialectic between the intimate, in the way it reveals itself to the other in the loving couple, and the extimate, the self-image sought in the gaze of others and, for the baby, in the gaze of the mother first and foremost. Based on this opposition, we question the position of the arrogant, the conformist, or the snob, as well as the prison in which the extimate confines the mythomaniac. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article systematically reconstructs the key elements of the articulation of Marx's new materialism by Karl Korsch, Weimar Germany's anti-Stalinist and anti-Social Democratic Marxist heretic. After a brief biographical presentation, and a sketch of the topography of philosophical positions prior and contemporary to him, I develop a thematic presentation of Korsch's reading of Marx's materialist dialectics, this-sidedness, the coincidence of consciousness and reality, the problem of application, his salvaging of the category of content, the materialist conception of history and his efforts to produce a theory of the material reproduction of ideology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the Meno, the dialectician is the one who is able to discern between true and false opinions. Following this reasoning, it could be argued that the dialectician is the only one capable of teaching virtue (political virtue). However, the dialogue does not allow us to make this assertion, as it concludes by stating that virtue is not knowledge (89c-100c), and therefore, cannot be taught (98d). As Socrates emphasizes, to know whether virtue is knowledge, one must first investigate "what is virtue?" (100b), which does not occur in this aporetic work. Dialectics emerges in the dialogue as the art of discourse, to mark its opposition to eristic, which is characterized by refutation. The difference between the two arts is that dialectics assumes a more positive, methodological perspective of knowledge construction, in contrast to sophistic antilogic. Although the Forms are not yet present, at least explicitly, in the discussion, the dialogue introduces the method of hypothesis, which will enable the philosopher, more than the sophist, to achieve knowledge of the foundations (98a). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The essay recalls the loci theologici doctrine of Melchior Cano and opens it up for a theological epistemology in the service of ecclesiogenesis in times of synodality. In the modern age, Cano has opened up paths for a modern dogmatics by including history as locus alienus. In the present, the doctrine of the loci theologici contributes to the development of a topical dialectic that gives space to post-conciliar local church and contextual theological developments. It opens the way for a theological epistemology of a world church in which the different cultural contexts enter into a lively dialogue about the struggle for theological truth. From the perspective of a German theologian, it may then be possible to identify the basic elements of a form of epistemology, which is aware of the criticism of Eurocentric theological figures of thought of the past and takes decolonial challenges into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article undertakes a critical analysis of Adorno's interpretation of Kant's conception of practical freedom, with the primary aim of investigating the key concept of 'addendum' proposed in the third part of Negative Dialectics, Model Freedom. We commence by presenting some central aspects of Adorno's conception of human freedom, thereby directing the argumentation towards defending the hypothesis of a certain artificiality inherent in the concept of an addendum. This consideration arises from the somewhat antinomian and generic manner in which Adorno addresses the relationship between the realms of thought (consciousness, language, culture) and nature (body, physiology, natural impulses). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this paper is to confront Hegel's conceptions of progress, based on Theodor Adorno's rearrangement of the categories of particular and universal, that follow from Hegelians's philosophy. The purpose is to expose Adorno's criticism, formulated in the Negative Dialectic, to Hegel's notion that the course of universal history is the effective realization of the progress of the world's spirit in its particular figures. So, the particular and the universal will be taken as explanatory categories of the Adornian critique of the totality and systematicity, with the aim of relocating the particular within the dialectic by attributing to it the non-identity character and resistance to systematicity and coercive forms of totality; then, it will be to evoke Walter Benjamin's philosophy of history present in Adorno's thought, so that, finally, one can support the hypothesis that the march of the spirit of the world is less consistent with progress, however, much more with the regression, which occurs as progress makes use of a narrative whose tendency is to obliterate violence and the domination of universal forces over the particular, by hiding the contradictions triggered in the context of the march of the history of the spirit of the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the Azerbaijani poetic language, certain interesting aspects of the linguistic features of dialectisms consisting of adjectives manifest themselves, and poets have skillfully used such dialectisms to create stylistic nuances unique to themselves. In poetry, words that express qualities, attributes, and characteristics of objects, events, and names are quite rich, and a significant part of these consist of dialectisms based on adjectives. Based on rich poetic examples, it can be confidently said that our poets have more frequently used dialectisms that express the qualities and characteristics of adjectives rather than their synonyms. This is entirely lawful because an object, event, or phenomenon does not have just one attribute or quality, but rather several and these attributes and qualities also exist in various degrees and with different nuances. To express all these subtleties, attributes, and qualities in poetic language, our poets resort to dialectisms made up of adjectives, and in the article, their linguistic characteristics are discussed. In the semantic structure of poetry's phraseological model, dialectisms made up of adjectives hold an important place, and these dialectisms, along with their synonymous variants, play an unparalleled role in the creation of stylistic structures with different stylistic shades. The stylistic and grammatical capacity of poetic language is greatly expanded with the help of dialectics consisting of adjectives, and the poetic materials present in Azerbaijani linguistics are rarely seen to touch upon such important issues. Given this, the relevance of the subject discussed in the article is highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dominant tone of the literature on land's territorial politics misses conceptual complexities by neglecting historical constructions of land practices. An alternative understanding intertwines social and political elements emphasised in the non‐dualistic, beyond dialectics, tongbian philosophy. This views everything as consisting of two mutually embedded, opposite poles—different yet without alienation; set in a ceaseless interaction as processes of becoming, continuity and change. The concept of focus–field relationship via a spatial story deciphers complexities between viewing land as territory (LaT) and land as property (LaP). Mobilising this formulation in sites of intensive real estate change (Hong Kong's Sham Shui Po and Mumbai's Malad) reveals subtleties of historical antecedents shaping contemporary forces. Here, complex institutional entanglements reveal both diachronic and synchronic interactions wherein the dynamics of control, shifts in power, growth or decline in time and space co‐join LaT and LaP. Such political complexities question views of land's transformation being contingent on archaic ideas of the Westphalian state and uni‐polar framings of capital moving from the North to the South. The tongbian philosophy allows the exploring of ideas of difference without alienation, embracing epistemic and ontological equivalence in theory and fieldwork, and between the North and South—themes seldom taken up in the geographical literature. Finally, the paper proposes a study of land dynamics using the concept of land occupancy via the spatial story approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Educational researchers are increasingly striving on the edge of possibility to re-imagine and realise the future. Activist scholarship requires appropriate philosophical and theoretical bases, what Stetsenko refers to as 'dangerous' – useful in the struggle for a better world. How might praxis, agency and learning be charged with transgressive spirit? This paper considers the Theory of Practice Architectures and Transformative Activist Stance, established frameworks that dangerously address praxis, agency and learning. Adopting a postabyssal approach, contributions from the Global South and East are drawn on to develop an epistemologically plural basis for thinking differently about praxis, agency and learning. Recent Latin American scholarship reinvigorates Freirean ideas through connections with Fals Borda and contemporary feminist pedagogues, centred on a notion of feeling-thinking. Luitel's interpretations of Vedic philosophy provide radically different ideas of negative dialectics, chaos, responsibility and liberation. An open-minded, open-hearted, open-ended approach is crucial to making these ideas more useful in the struggle over alternative, more equitable and just futures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mnemonics are not only tools that empower memory but also have a significant role in qualitatively transforming mental functions and, hence, consciousness in general. A specific type of mnemonics is autobiographical mnemonics (AM) constructed of spatial, temporal, and semantic dimensions used in a naturalist form by individuals about their own experiences. This paper proposes a spatial–temporal mnemonic that transforms AM from a naturalist level into an artificial one. We consider allowing the intellect and consciousness to grasp the abstract flow of time in the global context of geography will contribute to setting the stage for creativity. By explicitly representing the abstract time–space theater, the intellect (the world view) is more able to reflect the abstract laws of reality (the world), hence, to make the intellect sphere objectively equipped to externalize the emerged meanings (the internalized reality) that reflect the internal content of experience and, hence, make sense of them as a crucial function in creative activity. The paper is a theoretical and methodological step for the empirical part of the proposal when the mnemonic should be used as a training tool to empower creativity factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Pädagogik is the property of Julius Beltz GmbH & Co. KG Beltz Juventa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article examines unilateral acts of states in the international legal system based on a complex systemic analysis. The methodological basis was the dialectical method, which made it possible to understand the essence of international legal obligations of states in inseparable unity and general connection. The relevance of the study is determined by the trends inherent in modern international law. First, with the development of information technologies, and especially with the development of forms of information transmission, the sphere of activity of states is transformed. An increasing number of interested persons knows their positions on a wide range of international legal issues. On the one hand, it simplifies the process of identifying the state's position when its analysis is necessary for international legal qualification. On the other hand, in such a situation, the possibilities for interpreting the behavior of a specific state from the point of view of its agreement or disagreement with a certain legal situation expand. In the practice of international relations, there is an expansion of the system of sources of international law. The study of these sources is necessary for understanding the foundations of international law, solving specific international problems and increasing the effectiveness of international cooperation. As the practice of international jurisdictional bodies accumulated, the subject of study of which was unilateral acts of states, the research emphasis shifted from establishing the essence of unilateral acts to assessing their relationship with the sources of international law. It is noted that unilateral acts play an important independent role in the modern international system, which is characterized by both fragmentation and growing globalization. Modern means of communication have made it possible to make unilateral acts one of the most frequently used tools of state interaction. The appropriateness and necessity of the development of the legal regime of unilateral acts is emphasized and substantiated. Unilateral acts of states are recognized as independent additional sources of international law capable of generating international legal norms, and they can be found in the «sources» section of many leading international legal documents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Contemporary Islamic Thought / Al-Fikr al-Islāmī al-Muʿāṣir is the property of International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) is the property of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article examines the relationship between parental responsibility as a measure of protection of children's rights and Private International Law on the example of the application of parental responsibility measures to Ukrainians in EU countries. The purpose of the article is to provide a legal analysis of the problem of removal of children from Ukrainian families by social services in the EU countries as a measure of parental responsibility. In the example of the analysis of the national legislation of Spain, Poland, Sweden, Germany and Finland, the differences in the legal regulation of parental responsibility are considered. The most pressing issues that arise when initiating a case on parental responsibility of persons enjoying temporary protection in the EU countries have been identified. The methodological basis of the research is: dialectical method, comparative legal method, method of legal analysis. It has been established that in most cases the removal of children from families as a measure of parental responsibility was applied based on improper performance of parental duties, but there are cases when such measures were of a preventive nature. The need to improve the legal regulation of parental responsibility in the legislation of Ukraine has been identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Académica Internacional de Educación Física is the property of Asociacion Cientifica Internacional de Educacion Fisica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: This paper explores the role of accounting and accountability techniques in contributing to Australia's border industrial complex. Design/methodology/approach: We use the political thought of Behrouz Boochani to explore the role that accounting techniques play at the micro and macro level of his dialectic of alienation and freedom. Firstly, we explore the accounting and accountability techniques detailed in Boochani's No Friend but the Mountain, which gives an account of his life in Manus Prison, and the accounting techniques he experienced. Secondly, we explore the discourse of alienation created within the annual reporting of the Australian Federal Government regarding the border industrial complex. Findings: We argue that the border industrial complex requires the alienation of asylum seekers from their own humanity for capital accumulation, and that accounting and accountability techniques facilitate this form of alienation. These techniques include inventorying, logging and queuing at the micro level within Manus Prison. This alienates those trapped in the system from one another and themselves. Techniques also include annual reporting at a macro level which alienates those trapped in the system from the (White) "Australian Community". However, these techniques are resisted at every point by assertions of freedom. Originality/value: We illustrate the role of accounting in accumulation by alienation, where the unfreedom of incarcerated asylum seekers is a site of profit for vested interests. But also that this alienation is resisted at every point by refusals of alienation as assertions of freedom. Thus, this study contributes to the accounting literature by drawing from theories of alienation, and putting forward the dialectic of alienation and freedom articulated by Boochani and collaborators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

I argue that Gilles-Gaston Granger (1920–2016) broadly incorporates the central affirmations of Jean Cavaillès's (1903–44) philosophy of the concept into his own epistemological program. Cavaillès and Granger share three interrelated epistemological commitments: they claim (1) that mathematics has its own content and is therefore autonomous from and irreducible to logic, (2) that conceptual transformations in the history of mathematics can only be explained by an internal dialectic of concepts, and (3) that the objectivity of mathematics is an effect of the productive form of its rationality—that is, they claim that mathematical objectivity is the result of a generative process internal to mathematics. Mathematical objectivity, as I demonstrate, requires Cavaillès and Granger to modify the limits of epistemological critique as envisioned by Kant. For Cavaillès, this modification requires the elimination of the transcendental in favor of a dialectic of concepts. For Granger, the philosophy of the concept remains a genre of transcendental critique, but in a radically revised "Ptolemaic" style. I initially demonstrate how Granger extracts each of these claims from Cavaillès. I then follow Granger as he develops these claims in the service of a novel description of the content and structure of mathematical objectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]