101. Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Potential or Perceived Conflicts of Interest
- Author
-
Clifton W. Callaway, Peter T. Morley, Brian Eigel, Mary Fran Hazinski, Dianne L. Atkins, Robert E. O'Connor, Tanya I. Semenko, John E. Billi, Michael R. Sayre, William H. Montgomery, Ian Jacobs, Michael Shuster, Robert W. Hickey, and Vinay M. Nadkarni
- Subjects
Emergency Medical Services ,Resuscitation ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cardiology ,MEDLINE ,Scientific literature ,Physiology (medical) ,Emergency medical services ,Humans ,Medicine ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Association (psychology) ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,Conflict of Interest ,business.industry ,Conflict of interest ,American Heart Association ,Evidence-based medicine ,medicine.disease ,Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ,United States ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Perception ,Medical emergency ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
In summary, the evidence review process has attempted to provide a systematic review of the scientific literature using a priori defined methods. The details and steps of the literature review are transparent and replicable. External opinions and community critique are highly valued, and the final products represent the combined labor of hundreds of participants.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF