Search

Hypersensitivity to aspirin is rare disorder occurring in 1.88% of the patients. Aspirin-hypersensitive patients requiring single antiplatelet agent may be treated with clopidogrel, an alternative antiplatelet agent. However, aspirin desensitization is more cost-effective than the usage of clopidogrel in these patients. Furthermore, aspirin desensitization is of greater value in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy, for example following procedures like percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) instead of using non-aspirin-based combinations. Herein, we report a 74-year-old hypertensive male presented with features of acute coronary syndrome and planned for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of RCA followed by dual antiplatelet therapy. Since he had aspirin allergy, desensitization was done using rapid desensitization protocol for which he responded well. This case highlights the importance of aspirin-desensitization in patients with aspirin allergy instead of choosing non-aspirin based antiplatelet agents.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are a type of adverse drug reaction that can occur with different classes of drugs and affect multiple organ systems and patient populations. DHRs can be classified as allergic or non-allergic based on the cellular mechanisms involved. Whereas nonallergic reactions rely mainly on the innate immune system, allergic reactions involve the generation of an adaptive immune response. Consequently, drug allergies are DHRs for which an immunological mechanism, with antibody and/or T cell, is demonstrated. Despite decades of research, methods to predict the potential for a new chemical entity to cause DHRs or to correctly attribute DHRs to a specific mechanism and a specific molecule are not well-established. This review will focus on allergic reactions induced by systemically administered low-molecular weight drugs with an emphasis on drug- and patient-specific factors that could influence the development of DHRs. Strategies for predicting and diagnosing DHRs, including potential tools based on the current state of the science, will also be discussed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.)

Background: Patients are commonly reported as being allergic to beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics. However, many patients with this reported allergy are able to receive BL treatments because they do not have true allergies. In many cases these are simply intolerances due to side effects reported as an allergy. Delabelling these patients leads to better clinical outcomes, optimal antibiotic usage, decreased bacterial resistance and reduced healthcare costs. Therefore, the aims of this study were to identify incorrectly labelled BL allergies in hospitalised patients and to assess antibiotic use in delabelled patients in order to establish a quality indicator to optimise antimicrobial treatments., Methods: A prospective study was conducted in which hospitalised patients treated with antimicrobial drugs and labelled as 'BL-allergic' were identified by clinical pharmacists. An allergist assessed whether patients were suitable candidates for a skin test or oral challenge. The Allergy Service removed 'BL-allergic' labels if negative results were obtained. Delabelled patients were followed up by clinical pharmacists to study the use of BL antibiotics as a result of the delabelling programme., Results: A total of 176 suspected allergic patients were identified and 91 (51.7%) were tested either by a skin test or oral challenge based on the patient indicators. Seven (16.4%) patients tested were allergic to BL antibiotics, 76 (83.5%) were totally delabelled and eight (0.1%) were partially delabelled. Thirty-two (38.1%) delabelled patients required antibiotic treatment in another inpatient or outpatient setting, of whom 27 (84.3%) patients with a new infectious episode received BL treatments while five (15.7%) continued to receive antimicrobial treatments without BL., Conclusion: After the implementation of a protocol to detect incorrect BL allergy labels, 83.5% of the patients in this cohort were completely delabelled. This shows that there is a clear opportunity to optimise the use of antibiotics by delabelling 'BL-allergic' patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objective: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AX-CL) is the most consumed ß-lactam antibiotic worldwide. We aimed to establish the different phenotypes of ß-lactam allergy in patients reporting a reaction to AX-CL and to investigate the differences between immediate and nonimmediate onset., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study at Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Madrid and Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (HRUM), Málaga, Spain. We included patients reporting reactions with AX-CL who underwent the allergy workup between 2017 and 2019. Data on the reported reaction and allergy work-up were collected. Reactions were classified as immediate and nonimmediate with a 1-hour cut-off., Results: The study population comprised 372 patients (HCSC 208, HRUM 164). There were 90 immediate reactions (24.2%), 252 nonimmediate reactions (67.7%), and 30 reactions with unknown latency (8.1%). Allergy to ß-lactams was ruled out in 266 patients (71.5%) and confirmed in 106 patients (28.5%). The final main diagnosis in the overall population was allergy to aminopenicillins (7.3%), to CL (7%), to penicillin (6.5%), and to ß-lactams (5.9%). Allergy was confirmed in 77.2% and 14.3% of immediate and nonimmediate reactions, respectively, with a relative risk of 5.06 (95%CI, 3.64-7.02) for an allergy diagnosis in those reporting immediate reactions. Only 2/54 patients with a late-positive intradermal test (IDT) result for CL were diagnosed with CL allergy., Conclusion: Allergy was diagnosed in a minority of the study population. However, given that it was diagnosed 5 times more frequently in patients reporting immediate reactions, this classification proved useful for risk stratification. Late-positive IDT results for CL have no diagnostic value. Therefore, the late IDT reading for CL could be removed from the diagnostic work-up.

Background: Remimazolam is a recently developed, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is used as a general anesthetic. Some cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis have been reported, but its characteristics are not fully understood. We present an interesting case report and review of the literature to better understand remimazolam anaphylaxis., Case Presentation: A 75-year-old man scheduled for robot-assisted gastrectomy was administered remimazolam for the induction of general anesthesia. After intubation, low end-expiratory CO 2 , high airway pressure and concurrent circulatory collapse were observed. Bronchoscopy revealed marked tracheal and bronchial edema, which we diagnosed as anaphylaxis. The patient suffered cardiac arrest after bronchoscopy but recovered immediately with intravenous adrenaline administration and chest compressions. We performed skin prick tests for the drugs used during induction except for remimazolam, considering the high risk of systemic adverse reactions to remimazolam. We diagnosed remimazolam anaphylaxis because the skin prick test results for the other drugs used during anesthesia were negative, and these drugs could have been used without allergic reactions during the subsequent surgery. Furthermore, this patient had experienced severe anaphylactic-like reactions when he underwent cardiac surgery a year earlier, in which midazolam had been used, but it was not thought to be the allergen at that time. Based on these findings, cross-reactivity to remimazolam and midazolam was suspected. However, the patient had previously received another benzodiazepine, brotizolam, to which he was not allergic, suggesting that cross-reactivity of remimazolam may vary among benzodiazepines. In this article, we reviewed the 11 cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis that have been described in the literature., Conclusions: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting sedative; however, it can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis. In addition, its cross-reactivity with other benzodiazepines is not fully understood. To increase the safety of this drug, further research and more experience in its use are needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The excessive, often unconfirmed suspicions of beta-lactam allergy affect up to 10% of the general population, improperly denying a significant percentage of individuals the opportunity to be treated with first-line antibiotics, forcing clinicians to resort to second-line choices that are not always equally effective, safe, and contribute to the increase in antibiotic resistance. Pediatricians and general practitioners can play a crucial role in recognizing and addressing weak suspicions of beta-lactam allergy, actively participating in removing the "label" of being allergic. The article, based on Who AWaRe Manual recommendations, presents current evidence on the issue with practical guidance to promote accurate interpretation and management of an overestimated problem that does not encourage a culture of optimal and prudent antibiotic use.

Background: Povidone, a synthetic polymer commonly used in various products such as antiseptics, cosmetics, and medications, has been associated with allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Despite its widespread use, cases of povidone-induced anaphylaxis, especially in children, are under-recognized. This case report aims to highlight the importance of considering povidone allergy in pediatric patients presenting with anaphylaxis. Case Presentation: We describe a 3-year-old boy who experienced anaphylaxis following the application of povidone-iodine antiseptic solution to a leg wound. He presented with generalized urticaria, angioedema, dyspnea, and cough. Prompt diagnosis and management were initiated in the emergency department. He experienced the second anaphylaxis with povidone-containing eye drops prescribed during an ophthalmology visit. Conclusions: Povidone allergy should be considered in pediatric patients presenting with anaphylaxis, especially those with idiopathic reactions or multiple drug allergies. Clinicians should emphasize patient education on label reading and the provision of adrenaline autoinjectors to prevent life-threatening reactions associated with povidone exposure.

Background: Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) can significantly impair patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, tools for HRQoL assessment for patients with DHR are time-consuming and remain underutilized., Objective: To develop and validate an optimized version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) designed for everyday clinical use., Methods: Item response theory (IRT), a statistical framework for psychometric measurement, was used to evaluate the 15 questions from the original DrHy-Q for their respective item difficulty, discrimination, and information using prospective data from 243 patients with histories of suspected/confirmed DHR before allergy workup. Accordingly, the best-performing items were identified to develop a 6-item optimized version (DrHy-Q6), which was subsequently validated with another prospective cohort of 156 patients., Results: All 15 items of the original DrHy-Q demonstrated satisfactory parameters in IRT analysis, including very high discrimination (>1.7), appropriate difficulty (in between -1.5 and 1.5), and good information (a high and broad peak in the information curve). Six items with top-ranked IRT parameters were identified to construct an optimized version, which we named the DrHy-Q6. The DrHy-Q6 demonstrated a 1-factor structure with an improved fit compared with the original DrHy-Q (comparative fit index = 0.985, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.974), excellent convergent validity (unadjusted Pearson correlation with the full version = 0.955; adjusted = 0.894, P < .001), reliability (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.93), divergent validity (Pearson correlation with all Short Form 12-item Health Survey Version 2 subscales <0.60, P < .001), and discriminant validity (significantly higher scores with multiple DHR labels [42.45 ± 27.26 vs 32.93 ± 26.66], P = .013)., Conclusions: From an IRT perspective, the DrHy-Q and all its constituent items are psychometrically valid for HRQoL assessment. We propose an optimized 6-item version (DrHy-Q6) as an abbreviated alternative for assessing HRQoL in patients with DHR, especially for routine use in clinical practice. Patients and physicians may benefit from its streamlined length and simpler scoring algorithm., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neurocysticercosis is a growing public health problem in the United States. Albendazole is a mainstay of medical therapy for neurocysticercosis, and here we present a case of hypersensitivity to albendazole leading to life-threatening disease progression., Objective: To report the first successful albendazole desensitization protocol., Methods: An oral albendazole 12-step desensitization protocol was developed, starting with 0.001 mg and progressing at 15 minutes intervals. Dosage for each subsequent step was as follows: 0.003 mg, 0.01 mg, 0.03 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.3 mg, 1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg, 100 mg, 300mg., Results: The patient rapidly improved from a symptomatic standpoint, and repeat MRI showed a dramatic improvement in lesions., Conclusions: This successful desensitization protocol to albendazole can be of value to other patients with history suggestive of IgE-mediated allergy needing treatment for parasitic infections.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) manifested as vasculitis are rare. Antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sulphonamides, diuretics, immunosupressants and anticonvulsants are the most common culprits for drug-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) but there is scarce information about barbiturates. We present a case of 53-year-old female with severe vasculitis after phenobarbital- and NSAIDs-containing medications use. The preliminary diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis was made based on anamnestic and clinical data. Further examinations confirmed the diagnosis of LCV and excluded other more common causes of vasculitis. The causative significance of used medications was assessed by long-term observation of the patient after the reaction, including the drug challenge series and Naranjo's Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. It was concluded that phenobarbital is the most probable culprit drug. The patient's data were included in the Armenian Registry of Patients with Severe DHRs. Since then, the patient has avoided only barbiturate-containing drugs and no reactions were noted. Thus, the case indicates that even with limited diagnostic capabilities, the final diagnosis of rare drug-induced LCV and even rarer culprit drug can be established by comparing the available data. Awareness about phenobarbital and proper recording of the case are important in the management and prevention of DHRs manifested as vasculitis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.)

Purpose: Critically ill patients are vulnerable to penicillin allergy labels that may be incorrect. The validity of skin testing in intensive care units (ICUs) is uncertain. Many penicillin allergy labels are low risk, and validated tools exist to identify those amenable to direct oral challenge. This pilot randomised controlled trial explored the feasibility, safety, and validity of direct enteral challenge for low-risk penicillin allergy labels in critical illness., Methods: Consenting patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy label (PAL) (PEN-FAST risk assessment score < 3) in four ICUs (Melbourne, Australia) were randomised 1:1 to penicillin (250 mg amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) direct enteral challenge versus routine care (2-h post-randomisation observation for each arm). Repeat challenge was performed post -ICU in the intervention arm. Patients were reviewed at 24 h and 5 days after each challenge/observation., Results: We screened 533 patients. 130 (24.4%) were eligible and 80/130 (61.5%) enrolled (age median 64.5 years (interquartile range, IQR 53.5, 74), PEN-FAST median 1 (IQR 0,1)), with 40 (50%) randomised to direct enteral challenge. A positive challenge rate of 2.5% was identified. No antibiotic-associated serious adverse events were identified. 32/40 (80%) received a repeat challenge (zero positive). Post-randomisation, 13 (32%) of the intervention arm and 4 (10%) of the control arm received penicillin (odds ratio, OR 4.33 [1.27, 14.78] p = 0.019)., Conclusion: These findings support the safety, validity, and feasibility of direct enteral challenge for critically ill patients with PEN-FAST assessed low-risk penicillin allergy. The absence of false negative results was confirmed by subsequent negative repeat challenges. A relatively low recruitment to screened ratio suggests that more inclusive eligibility criteria and integration of allergy assessment into routine ICU processes are needed to optimise allergy delabelling in critical illness., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Thiocolchicoside is a muscle relaxant, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic. Administered orally, intramuscularly, or topically, this drug is used in the symptomatic treatment of muscular spasms and rheumatologic disorders. Despite its extensive use, thiocolchicoside is a very rare sensitizer., Objective: To evaluate IgE-mediated reaction to thiocolchicoside by basophil activation test., Methods: Allergological work-up with skin prick tests, intradermal tests and basophil activation test with thiocolchicoside., Results: We report the first case of immediate reaction to thiocolchicoside confirmed by basophil activation test in addition to positive skin tests., Conclusions: BAT can be considered a complementary diagnostic tool to demonstrate an IgE-mediated reaction also for muscle relaxant drugs.

Background: Approximately 15% of patients in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics report penicillin allergies, complicating treatment for syphilis and gonorrhea. Nonetheless, >90% do not have a penicillin allergy when evaluated. We developed and validated an algorithm to define which patients reporting penicillin allergy can be safely treated at STI clinics with these drugs., Methods: Randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility and safety of penicillin allergy evaluations in STI clinics. Participants with reported penicillin allergy answered an expert-developed questionnaire to stratify risk. Low-risk participants underwent penicillin skin testing (PST) followed by amoxicillin 250 mg challenge or a graded oral challenge (GOC)-amoxicillin 25 mg followed by 250 mg. Reactions were recorded, and participant/provider surveys were conducted., Results: Of 284 participants, 72 (25.3%) were deemed high risk and were excluded. Of 206 low-risk participants, 102 (49.5%) underwent PST without reactions and 3 (3%) had mild reactions during the oral challenge. Of 104 (50.5%) participants in the GOC, 95 (91.3%) completed challenges without reaction, 4 (4.2%) had mild symptoms after 25 mg, and 4 (4.2%) after 250-mg doses. Overall, 195 participants (94.7%) successfully completed the study and 11 (5.3%) experienced mild symptoms. Of 14 providers, 12 (85.7%) completed surveys and 11 (93%) agreed on the safety/effectiveness of penicillin allergy assessment in STI clinics., Conclusions: An easy-to-administer risk-assessment questionnaire can safely identify patients for penicillin allergy evaluation in STI clinics by PST or GOC, with GOC showing operational feasibility. Using this approach, 67% of participants with reported penicillin allergy could safely receive first-line treatments for gonorrhea or syphilis. Clinical Trials Registration. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04620746)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. A. B. reports research funding support from NIH, Nabriva, Hologic, and SpeeDx, and participation on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for an NIH-funded study on the Bexsero vaccine (looking at mucosal immunity). C. J. M. reports receiving research funding from BARDA/GSK, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GlaxoSmithKline, Cepheid, Gilead, Hologic, and the National Association of County and CityHealth Officials and consulting honoraria from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Contraceptive Technologies, Core Concepts in Health, and AHEC (Area Health Education Centers); and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for the NIH (unpaid) and Advisory Board for Talis Biomedical (payment to their institution); and receipt of study product provided to their institution from Lupin. J. M. Z. reports compensation for service on Data Safety Monitoring Committees for Pfizer. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Delayed anaphylaxis after ingestion of red meat because of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) syndrome has increased in recent years. The mechanism involves an immunoglobulin E reaction to alpha-gal, a molecule found in mammalian meat, dairy products, medications and excipients containing mammalian-derived components, and tick salivary glycans. Sensitization occurs due to the bite of a lone star tick and the transmission of alpha-gal molecules into person's bloodstream. We describe a case of alpha-gal syndrome with severe food, drug, and perioperative allergy in which anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock occurred immediately after an emergency surgical procedure, when a gelatin-containing drug was injected. This case study confirms that the clinical manifestations of alpha-gal syndrome could be different depending on the route of administration, with immediate reactions if an alpha-gal-containing drug is injected and delayed type allergic manifestations occurring several hours after oral intake. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of risk communication in case of exposure to medical products and surgical procedures of patients with alpha-gal syndrome and to encourage drug manufacturers to indicate clearly the origin of excipients in product literature., Competing Interests: The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Kidney replacement therapies (KRTs) including hemodialysis (HD) are one of the treatment options for most of the patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although HD is vital for these patients, it is not hundred percent physiological, and various adverse events including hypersensitivity reactions may occur. Fortunately, these reactions are rare in total and less when compared to previous decades, but it is still very important for at least two reasons: First, the number of patients receiving kidney replacement treatment is increasing globally; and the cumulative number of these reactions may be substantial. Second, although most of these reactions are mild, some of them may be very severe and even lead to mortality. Thus, it is very important to have basic knowledge and skills to diagnose and treat these reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur at any component of dialysis machinery (access, extracorporeal circuit, medications, etc.). The most important preventive measure is to avoid the allergen. However, even with very specific test, sometimes the allergen cannot be found. In mild conditions, HD can be contained with non-specific treatment (topical creams, antihistaminics, corticosteroids). In more severe conditions, treatment must be stopped immediately, blood should not be returned to patient, drugs must be stopped, and rules of general emergency treatment must be followed., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Using the reaction history in logistic regression and machine learning (ML) models to predict penicillin allergy has been reported based on non-US data., Objective: We developed ML positive penicillin allergy testing prediction models from multisite US data., Methods: Retrospective data from 4 US-based hospitals were grouped into 4 datasets: enriched training (1:3 case-control matched cohort), enriched testing, nonenriched internal testing, and nonenriched external testing. ML algorithms were used for model development. We determined area under the curve (AUC) and applied the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to interpret risk drivers., Results: Of 4777 patients (mean age 60 [standard deviation: 17] years; 68% women, 91% White, and 86% non-Hispanic) evaluated for penicillin allergy labels, 513 (11%) had positive penicillin allergy testing. Model input variables were frequently missing: immediate or delayed onset (71%), signs or symptoms (13%), and treatment (31%). The gradient-boosted model was the strongest model with an AUC of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.77), which improved to 0.87 (95% CI: 0.73-1) when only cases with complete data were used. Top SHAP drivers for positive testing were reactions within the last year and reactions requiring medical attention; female sex and reaction of hives/urticaria were also positive drivers., Conclusions: An ML prediction model for positive penicillin allergy skin testing using US-based retrospective data did not achieve performance strong enough for acceptance and adoption. The optimal ML prediction model for positive penicillin allergy testing was driven by time since reaction, seek medical attention, female sex, and hives/urticaria., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

When approaching a case of apparent drug allergy, the consulting clinician should consider a broad differential diagnosis. This article presents a series of cases that could be commonly referred to an allergist for assessment as "drug allergy," however, a real diagnosis exists that mandates a different diagnostic and treatment strategy, including a case of inducible laryngeal obstruction, multiple drug intolerance syndrome, viral rash, seizure due to metastatic malignancy, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis initially diagnosed as drug reaction and eosinophilia with systemic symptoms. The initial misdiagnoses of these patients delayed or interfered with their medical care, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnoses for the benefit of our patients., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions (IDHSRs) have conventionally been attributed to an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mechanism. Nevertheless, it has now been acknowledged that IDHSRs can also occur independently of IgE involvement. Non-IgE-mediated IDHSRs encompass the activation of effector cells, both mast cell-dependent and -independent and the initiation of inflammatory pathways through immunogenic and nonimmunogenic mechanisms. The IDHSRs involve inflammatory mediators beyond histamine, including the platelet-activating factor, which activates multiple cell types, including smooth muscle, endothelium, and MC, and evidence supports its importance in IgE-mediated reactions in humans. Clinically, distinguishing IgE from non-IgE mechanisms is crucial for future treatment strategies, including drug(s) restriction, readministration approaches, and pretreatment considerations. However, this presents significant challenges because certain drugs can trigger both mechanisms, and their presentations can appear similarly, ranging from mild to life-threatening symptoms. Thus, history alone is often inadequate for differentiation, and skin tests lack a standardized approach. Moreover, drug-specific IgE immunoassays have favorable specificity but low sensitivity, and the usefulness of the basophil activation test remains debatable. Lastly, no biomarker reliably differentiates between both mechanisms. Whereas non-IgE-mediated mechanisms likely predominate in IDHSRs, reclassifying most drug-related IDHSRs as non-IgE-mediated, with suggested prevention through dose administration adjustments, is premature and risky. Therefore, continued research and validated diagnostic tests are crucial to improving our capacity to distinguish between these mechanisms, ultimately enhancing patient care., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemotherapeutic drugs can lead to a wide spectrum of cutaneous findings, ranging from nonimmune toxic reactions to severe immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, histopathological features, and prognosis of toxic skin reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and to compare them with characteristics of immune-mediated reactions in children with malignancies. Methods: The medical records of all children with cancer who experienced skin reactions after chemotherapy administration and diagnosed as a toxic skin reaction between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis was re-evaluated and differentiated from other similar disorders by using clinical manifestations, photodocumentation, and histopathological findings. Results: A total of 17 children aged 2-17 years were involved: toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) in 14 children, methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis in 2 children, and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)-like TEC in 1 child. The most commonly implicated drug was methotrexate. Most patients recovered rapidly after drug cessation and supportive measures. In 10 of the 17 patients, reintroduction of the culprit chemotherapeutic drug at reduced doses or increased dosage intervals was possible without any recurrence. Six patients could not receive further doses since they deceased due to sepsis and other complications. Conclusions: Cutaneous toxic eruptions to chemotherapeutic drugs may present with a severe phenotype resembling Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TEN. An accurate diagnosis prevents potentially harmful therapeutic interventions, withholding of chemotherapy, and erroneous assignment of drug allergies.

Background: Multiple drug intolerance syndrome (MDIS) describes patients with multiple nonimmunologically mediated adverse reactions to medications. Patients with more than 10 medication intolerance labels are considered to have severe MDIS. There is overlap in the characteristics of patients with MDIS and fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Severe MDIS can limit treatment options in this already complex patient group., Objective: This study assessed the prevalence of severe MDIS in patients with fibromyalgia and IBS and its associated risk factors., Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia or IBS who had been seen at a large academic center from August 2019 to July 2020. Exact birthdate- and sex-matched controls who had been seen within the same time frame were selected at random. Listed drug intolerance data and patient characteristics were then analyzed with logistic regression and χ 2 testing., Results: Patients with fibromyalgia and IBS were 12 and 3 times more likely to have severe MDIS compared with controls, respectively. Severe MDIS was associated with polypharmacy in both groups. Opiates were the most frequently reported drug intolerance across all participants. Although patients with IBS more often reported gastrointestinal symptoms as adverse reactions, individuals with fibromyalgia did not more frequently report pain or behavioral changes as adverse reactions., Conclusions: There was an increased rate of severe MDIS in patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia and IBS. Additional studies are needed to better understand the morbidity of MDIS and how it can best be managed in patients with fibromyalgia and IBS., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: β-Lactam antibiotics are widely used with increased utilization in hospitalized patients. Of this population, as high as 10-20% report an allergy to β-lactam antibiotics but <5% are at risk of developing clinically significant immunoglobulin E- or T-lymphocyte-mediated reactions. Most of the time, these reported allergies are present during an illness with no previous inquiry of their validity, which makes investigation and possible removal of this allergy label a challenge. Methods: We report a 16-year-old boy who presented with 1 week of night sweats, chills, headaches, and fatigue, followed by 1 day of fever and right knee swelling and who was diagnosed with septic bursitis. Due to concern of a penicillin allergy label, the patient was started on a cefepime infusion. Five minutes into the infusion, the patient reported puffy eyes and itchy throat, followed by a witnessed cascading flat nonpruritic erythematous rash from head to shoulders. This rash went away in 3 minutes after stopping the infusion and the patient being given 50 mg of intravenous diphenhydramine and 10 mg of oral dexamethasone. He was subsequently diagnosed with a cefepime allergy. Results: Allergy/immunology was the speciality consulted, and, by using a screening questionnaire, the patient's reported penicillin allergy was determined to be low risk. Subsequent 1-step oral challenge was the key to providing the patient with the necessary antibiotic course to resolve his infection. Conclusion: Multiple reported antibiotic allergies lead to poor antibiotic stewardship that causes impactful health and financial burden on the patient and health-care system. It is thus important to have an evidence-based systematic approach to de-label penicillin antibiotic allergy labels to reduce these potential harms.

Background: Liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) is a crucial agent in the treatment of invasive fungal diseases caused by a wide variety of yeasts and molds. In the presence of an infection caused by a fungal agent resistant to alternative antifungal drugs, desensitization may be the only option to continue treatment. However, there is insufficient information and consensus with regard to amphotericin B desensitization protocols in the pediatric age group. Objective: We present our experience with five cases of patients in whom successful desensitization protocols were applied with LAMB, along with a review of the literature on pediatric cases. We also provide a sample desensitization protocol that we successfully applied. Methods: Pediatric patients who continued their treatment with the successful rapid desensitization protocol conducted at the Paediatric Allergy and Immunology Clinic of the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between September 2019 and September 2023 were examined. Desensitization protocols were applied based on Castells' desensitization protocol. Results: Five patients ages between 5 and 12 years were referred to us due to the development of anaphylaxis during their treatment with LAMB. Anaphylaxis is diagnosed clinically, according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines: anaphylaxis (2021 update). A 16-step desensitization protocol was prepared by using LAMB solutions at four different dilutions (0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/mL). Each solution consisted of four steps, with a 15-minute infusion for each step. The patients were premedicated with 1 mg/kg/dose methylprednisolone and an antihistamine. Conclusion: The data we present on the successful application of a sample protocol to five cases, particularly in a pediatric setting, are noteworthy valuable contributions to the field, which demonstrates the feasibility and success of rapid desensitization with LAMB in pediatric patients. This can provide important insights and potentially serve as a reference for medical professionals working with similar cases in the future.

Background: Antibiotic treatment is crucial for patients with chronic bacterial infections. Suspected drug allergies often lead to inconsistent therapies and challenging clinical management for patients and caregivers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of lymphocyte transformation tests in comparison to skin tests for the prediction of delayed-type allergic reactions., Methods: This prospective, observational study tested the diagnostic value of skin prick tests, intradermal tests (reading: 15 min and 72 h) and lymphocyte transformations tests for the prediction of allergic reactions in CF patients with physician reported allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and ceftazidime. The tests were performed directly before a 14d intravenous drug challenge., Results: We performed 33 drug challenges in 29 subjects. 21 drug challenges were negative (63 %); 12 lead to a reaction (37 %), of those 2 were immediate and 10 were delayed-type. 100 % of the skin prick tests were negative. 97 % (33/34) of the intradermal tests with early reading and 100 % of the intradermal tests with late reading yielded negative results. 5/11 patients who experienced a delayed-type reaction during the drug challenge had a positive lymphocyte transformations test. All 17 patients who did not react had a negative lymphocyte transformations test. For piperacillin/tazobactam, 4/5 patients who experienced a delayed-type reaction during the drug challenge had positive lymphocyte transformations tests. Hence, for piperacillin/tazobactam, the sensitivity of the lymphocyte transformation test for prediction of reactions was 80.0 % and the specificity 100 %., Conclusion: We demonstrate that the lymphocyte transformation test predicts delayed-type allergy to piperacillin/tazobactam in contrast to skin tests., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JR has received payments for lectures from Vertex Pharmaceuticals outside of the submitted work. MAM received grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and personal fees for participation in advisory boards, consultancy and lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotech, and Antabio outside of the submitted work. DJN has received research grants from Merck, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals to study mechanisms of drug hypersensitivity. However, this funding does not directly relate to the research described in this manuscript. Other authors have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Risk stratification in drug allergy implies that specific risk categories (eg, low, moderate, and high) classify historical drug hypersensitivity reactions. These risk categories can be based on reaction phenotypic characteristics, the timing of the reaction and evaluation, the required reaction management, and individual characteristics. Although a multitude of frameworks have been described in the literature, particularly for penicillin allergy labels, there has yet to be a global consensus, and approaches continue to vary between allergy centers. Immune-mediated drug allergies can sometimes be confirmed using skin testing, but a negative drug challenge is required to demonstrate tolerance and remove the allergy from the electronic health record ("delabel" the allergy). Even for quintessential IgE-mediated drug allergy, penicillin allergy, recent data reveal that a direct oral challenge, without prior skin testing, is an appropriate diagnostic strategy in those who are considered low-risk. Drug allergy pathogenesis and clinical manifestations may vary depending on the culprit drug, and as such, the optimal approach should be based on risk stratification that considers individual patient and reaction characteristics, the likely hypersensitivity reaction phenotype, the drug class, and the patient's clinical needs. This article will describe low-risk drug allergy labels, focusing on β-lactam and sulfonamide antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, iodinated contrast media, and common chemotherapeutics. This review will also address practical management approaches using currently available risk stratification and clinical decision tools., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Perioperative anaphylaxis is rare and the diagnosis is difficult to distinguish from normal side effects from anaesthesia. Anaesthetists should be able to diagnose anaphylaxis and treat promptly with adrenaline and fluids. Allergy investigation should be performed subsequently. This is a case report of perioperative anaphylaxis to propofol. Propofol contains refined soya oil and egg lecithin, but no connection between allergy to soy, egg or peanut and allergy to propofol has been proven, and international guidelines recommend that propofol can be used in patients with these food allergies., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Background: Asparaginase (ASNase) is a crucial part of acute leukemia treatment, but immune responses to the agent can reduce its effectiveness and increase the risk of relapse. Currently, no reliable and validated biomarker predicts ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions during therapy. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers and determine immune cells responsible for anaphylaxis using a murine model of ASNase hypersensitivity., Methods: Our preclinical study uses a murine model to investigate predictive biomarkers of ASNase anaphylaxis, including anti-ASNase antibody responses, immune complex (IC) levels, ASNase-specific binding to leukocytes or basophils, and basophil activation., Results: Our results indicate that mice immunized to ASNase exhibited dynamic IgM, IgG, and IgE antibody responses. The severity of ASNase-induced anaphylaxis was found to be correlated with levels of IgG and IgE, but not IgM. Basophils from immunized mice were able to recognize and activate in response to ASNase ex vivo, and the extent of recognition and activation also correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis observed. Using a multivariable model that included all biomarkers significantly associated with anaphylaxis, independent predictors of ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions were found to be ASNase IC levels and ASNase-specific binding to leukocytes or basophils. Consistent with our multivariable analysis, we found that basophil depletion significantly protected mice from ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions, supporting that basophils are essential and can be used as a predictive marker of ASNase-induced anaphylaxis., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the need for using tools that can detect both IC- and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to mitigate the risk of ASNase-induced hypersensitivity reactions during treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Rathod, Hoshitsuki, Zhu, Ramsey and Fernandez.)