101. The Complementarity Mechanism: How Parties Regulate Newcomers’ Access to Power
- Author
-
UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe, Celis, Karen, Erzeel, Silvia, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe, Celis, Karen, Erzeel, Silvia, and ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops
- Abstract
Ethnic minorities are relative newcomers in formal electoral politics in Belgium. The first ethnic minority representative entered the Belgian federal parliament in 1995. Since then, ethnic representative have not made up more than 6% of the federal MPs. Surprisingly the majority of these ethnic minority representatives have been women. This article explores why ethnic minority women have gained quicker inroads into formal politics than ethnic minority men. Based on 25 interviews with party officials, we find that gendered patterns of ethnic minority representation are the result of how parties include newcomers on candidate lists. The integration of newcomers is marked out by two dynamics: (1) parties’ search for effectiveness, which benefits incumbents and severely limits newcomers’ access to power and (2) parties’ search for representativeness, which provides opportunities for new groups but at the same time introduces elements of competition between groups. We argue that ethnic minority women were elected in larger numbers because they were able to cash in what we label a ‘complementarity advantage’: they were least threatening to incumbent power and thus enhanced parties’ effectiveness, while their ‘intersectional identity mix’ maximized the representativeness of the list. We conclude that this complementarity mechanism is essential for understanding how new groups enter politics, and for explaining why some (sub)groups gain quicker inroads than others.
- Published
- 2014