101. Trans-apical and trans-axillary percutaneous aortic valve implantation as alternatives to the femoral route: short- and middle-term results
- Author
-
Matteo Montorfano, Micaela Cioni, Cosmo Godino, Francesco Maisano, Antonio Colombo, Maurizio Taramasso, Paolo Denti, Ottavio Alfieri, Taramasso, M, Maisano, F, Cioni, M, Denti, P, Godino, C, Montorfano, M, Colombo, A, and Alfieri, Ottavio
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Aortic valve ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cardiac Catheterization ,Percutaneous ,Femoral artery ,Aortic valve replacement ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Femoral Artery ,Catheter ,Axilla ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,Circulatory system ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Epidemiologic Methods - Abstract
Objective: Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative for patients not eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement. When peripheral access is not amenable by the transfemoral route (TF-TAVI), the most-used approaches are the trans-apical (TAp-TAVI) and the trans-axillary (TAx-TAVI). The aim of this study is to report the outcomes in a single-center series of consecutive patients treated by TAVI using the different approaches. Methods: From November 2007 to June 2010, 177 patients underwent TAVI by the same multispeciality valve team. TApTAVI was performed in the operative room, while TF-TAVI and TAx-TAVI were done in the catheterization laboratory. Follow-up was 100% complete (mean 6.0 6.8 months). Results: TF-TAVI, TAx-TAVI, and TAp-TAVI were performed in 140 (79.1%), 19 (10.7%), and 16 patients (9.1%), respectively. Thegroupswerenotdifferentintermsofage(p = 0.6),leftventricularejectionfraction(LVEF)(p = 0.6),Log-EuroSCORE(European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) (p = 0.3), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (p = 0.7), while peripheral artery disease was higher in the TAp-TAVI and TAx-TAVI groups compared with the TF-TAVI group (p < 0.0001). The Charlson score was 10.7 14.9, 5.8 1.2, and 5.9 1.8 for TAp-TAVI, TAx-TAVI, and TF-TAVI, respectively (p = 0.02). In-hospital (30-day) mortality was 1.4% (2/140), 12.5% (2/16), and 5.3% (1/19) for TF, Tap, and TAx, respectively (p = 0.03). At follow-up, 6 months’ actuarial survival was 72.2 12.0%, 67.4 17.4%, and 88.4 3.1% for TAp-TAVI, TAx-TAVI, and TF-TAVI, respectively (p = 0.3). Conclusions: Similar to findings from recent, larger trials, patients undergoing TF-TAVI in high-risk patients had excellent 6-month results. Although TAx-TAVI was associated with lower hospital mortality, it shared the same 6-month outcomes of TAp-TAVI, probably due to a similar selection bias. # 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2010