101. Comparison of 3- to 6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention Using the Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents With Ultrathin Struts: The HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Han JK, Hwang D, Yang S, Park SH, Kang J, Yang HM, Park KW, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Hur SH, Kim W, Kim SY, Park SH, Han SH, Kim SH, Shin S, Kim YH, Park K, Lee N, Lee SJ, Kim JW, and Kim HS
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors therapeutic use, Hemorrhage chemically induced, Sirolimus, Death, Treatment Outcome, Drug-Eluting Stents, Myocardial Infarction drug therapy, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Limited data are available on short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention using third-generation drug-eluting stents with ultrathin struts and advanced polymer technology. We investigated whether 3- to 6-month DAPT was noninferior to 12-month DAPT after implantation of drug-eluting stents with ultrathin struts and advanced polymer technology., Methods: We performed an open-label, randomized trial at 37 centers in South Korea. We enrolled patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using the Orsiro biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or the Coroflex ISAR polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 3- to 6-month or 12-month DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention. The choice of antiplatelet medications was at the physician's discretion. The primary outcome was a net adverse clinical event, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, or major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 at 12 months. The major secondary outcomes were target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and major bleeding., Results: A total of 2013 patients (mean age, 65.7±10.5 years; 1487 males [73.9%]; 1110 [55.1%] presented with acute coronary syndrome) were randomly assigned to 3- to 6-month DAPT (n=1002) or 12-month DAPT (n=1011). The primary outcome occurred in 37 (3.7%) patients in the 3- to 6-month DAPT group and 41 (4.1%) in the 12-month DAPT group. The noninferiority of the 3- to 6-month DAPT group to the 12-month DAPT group was met (absolute risk difference, -0.4% [1-sided 95% CI, -∞% to 1.1%]; P <0.001 for noninferiority). There were no significant differences in target lesion failure (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.56-1.71], P =0.94) or major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.41-1.61], P =0.56) between the 2 groups. Across various subgroups, the treatment effect of 3- to 6-month DAPT was consistent for net adverse clinical event., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using third-generation drug-eluting stents, 3- to 6-month DAPT was noninferior to 12-month DAPT for net adverse clinical event. Further research is needed to generalize this finding to other populations and to determine the ideal regimen for 3- to 6-month DAPT., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02601157.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF