Search

Traditional response criteria in MDS and AML are based on bone marrow morphology and may not accurately reflect clonal tumor burden in patients treated with non-cytotoxic chemotherapy. We used next-generation sequencing of serial bone marrow samples to monitor MDS and AML tumor burden during treatment with epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat). Serial bone marrow samples (and skin as a source of normal DNA) from 25 MDS and AML patients were sequenced (exome or 285 gene panel). We observed that responders, including those in complete remission (CR), can have persistent measurable tumor burden (i.e., mutations) for at least one year without disease progression. Using an ultra-sensitive sequencing approach, we detected extremely rare mutations (equivalent to 1 heterozygous mutant cell in 2000 non-mutant cells) months to years prior to their expansion at disease relapse. While patients can live with persistent clonal hematopoiesis in a CR or stable disease, ultimately we find evidence that expansion of a rare subclone occurs at relapse or progression. Here we demonstrate that sequencing of serial samples provides an alternative measure of tumor burden in MDS or AML patients and augments traditional response criteria that rely on bone marrow blast percentage.

A letter to the editor is presented on the study regarding the effectiveness of carfilzomib drug for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment.

PURPOSE: Persistent molecular disease (PMD) after induction chemotherapy predicts relapse in AML. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) and targeted error-corrected sequencing to assess the frequency and mutational patterns of PMD in 30 patients with AML. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort included 30 patients with adult AML younger than 65 years who were uniformly treated with standard induction chemotherapy. Tumor/normal WES was performed for all patients at presentation. PMD analysis was evaluated in bone marrow samples obtained during clinicopathologic remission using repeat WES and analysis of patient-specific mutations and error-corrected sequencing of 40 recurrently mutated AML genes (MyeloSeq). RESULTS: WES for patient-specific mutations detected PMD in 63% of patients (19/30) using a minimum variant allele fraction (VAF) of 2.5%. In comparison, MyeloSeq identified persistent mutations above 0.1% VAF in 77% of patients (23/30). PMD was usually present at relatively high levels (>2.5% VAFs), such that WES and MyeloSeq agreed for 73% of patients despite differences in detection limits. Mutations in DNMT3A , ASXL1 , and TET2 (ie, DTA mutations) were persistent in 16 of 17 patients, but WES also detected non-DTA mutations in 14 of these patients, which for some patients distinguished residual AML cells from clonal hematopoiesis. Surprisingly, MyeloSeq detected additional variants not identified at presentation in 73% of patients that were consistent with new clonal cell populations after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: PMD and clonal hematopoiesis are both common in patients with AML in first remission. These findings demonstrate the importance of baseline testing for accurate interpretation of mutation-based tumor monitoring assays for patients with AML and highlight the need for clinical trials to determine whether these complex mutation patterns correlate with clinical outcomes in AML. Persistent molecular disease and clonal hematopoiesis are common in patients with AML in remission after chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We performed a pilot clinical trial to determine the feasibility of maintenance lenalidomide after autologous stem cell transplant in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (rel/ref cHL). • An unexpectedly high frequency of hematologic toxicities resulting in early lenalidomide discontinuation was observed. • The lenalidomide maintenance dose and schedule used in this study are not feasible in rel/ref cHL. For patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), salvage chemotherapy followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the standard of care. Even with this aggressive treatment strategy, 5-year progression-free survival is ≤50%, and there remains interest in maintenance strategies to improve long-term disease-free survival. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with demonstrated activity in multiple subtypes of lymphoma including cHL, and has also been shown to improve both progression-free and overall survival as maintenance therapy after ASCT in multiple myeloma. This multicenter study evaluated maintenance lenalidomide after ASCT for patients with cHL. Patients were enrolled 60 to 90 days post-transplant and received oral lenalidomide on days 1 to 28 of 28-day cycles for a maximum of 18 cycles. Lenalidomide was started at 15 mg daily and increased to maximum of 25 mg daily if tolerated. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this regimen, with a goal <30% rate of discontinuation at or before cycle 12 for drug-related reasons. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and 26 received at least 1 dose of lenalidomide. With a median follow-up of 51.3 months (range, 12.2 to 76.2 months), 23 of 26 patients were alive. Median event-free survival was 9.4 months and median progression-free survival had not been reached, with 17 of 26 patients (65.4%) remaining in remission at last follow-up. Excluding 4 patients who discontinued therapy for progression and 2 who discontinued due to noncompliance, the discontinuation rate at or before cycle 12 was 52%. Treatment was complicated by a high frequency of hematologic adverse events, with 15 patients (58%) experiencing grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and 5 (19%) experiencing grade 4 hematologic toxicity. We conclude that the regimen of maintenance lenalidomide explored in this study is not feasible for patients with cHL immediately following ASCT. An alternative lenalidomide dose or schedule may be better tolerated following ASCT for patients with relapsed or refractory cHL. Image, graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel therapies are needed for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a multicenter, phase 1 study in advanced hematological malignancies to assess the safety, efficacy, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of oral selinexor, a selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein XPO1. In the dose-escalation phase, 25 patients with heavily pretreated MM (22) or Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (3) were administered selinexor (3-60 mg/m2) in 8 or 10 doses per 28-day cycle. In the dose-expansion phase, 59 patients with MM received selinexor at 45 or 60 mg/m2 with 20 mg dexamethasone, twice weekly in 28-day cycles, or selinexor (40 or 60 mg flat dose) without corticosteroids in 21-day cycles. The most common nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were nausea (75%), fatigue (70%), anorexia (64%), vomiting (43%), weight loss (32%), and diarrhea (32%), which were primarily grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs were hematologic, particularly thrombocytopenia (45%). Single-agent selinexor showed modest efficacy with an objective response rate (ORR) of 4% and clinical benefit rate of 21%. In contrast, the addition of dexamethasone increased the ORR with all responses of ‡partial response occurring in the 45 mg/m2 selinexor plus 20 mg dexamethasone twice weekly cohort (ORR550%). Furthermore, 46% of all patients showed a reduction inMM markers from baseline. Based on these findings,we conclude that selinexor in combinationwith dexamethasone is active in heavily pretreatedMMand propose a RP2D of 45mg/m2 (80mg) plus 20 mg dexamethasone given twiceweekly. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01607892. (Blood. 2018;131(8):855-863) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We evaluated selinexor, an orally bioavailable, first-in-class inhibitor of the nuclear export protein XPO1, in this phase 1 trial to assess safety and determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Seventy-nine patients with various NHL histologies, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Richter's transformation, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were enrolled. In the dose escalation phase, patients received 3-80 mg/m2 of selinexor in 3- or 4-week cycles and were assessed for toxicities, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity. In the dose expansion phase, patients were treated with selinexor at 35 or 60 mg/m2. The most common grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (47%), neutropenia (32%), anemia (27%), leukopenia (16%), fatigue (11%) and hyponatremia (10%). Tumor biopsies showed decreases in cell signaling pathways (Bcl-2, Bcl-6, c-Myc), reduced proliferation (Ki67), nuclear localization of XPO1 cargos (p53, PTEN) and increased apoptosis after treatment. Twenty-two (31%) of the 70 evaluable patients had an objective response (OR), including 4 complete responses (CR) and 18 partial responses (PR), which were observed across a spectrum of NHL subtypes. A dose of 35 mg/m2 (60mg) was identified as the RP2D. These findings suggest that inhibition of XPO1 with oral selinexor at 35 mg/m2 is a safe therapy with encouraging and durable anti-cancer activity in patients with R/R NHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) without prophylactic immunosuppression has been used for relapsed AML after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). However DLI is associated with an increased incidence of acute Graft vs. Host Disease (aGVHD). In mice, administration of azacitidine (AzaC) on days 4, 6, 8, and 10 post DLI increases regulatory T cell (Treg) numbers and prevents GVHD without hindering Graft vs. Leukemia (GVL). Based on these findings, we conducted a phase 1 study of AzaC post DLI for AML relapse post allo-SCT. AzaC was administered on days 4, 6, 8 and 10 post-DLI. Dose escalation was done using a 3 + 3 design with three AzaC dose levels: 30 mg/m 2 (level −1), 45 mg/m 2 (level 1) and 75 mg/m 2 (level 2). Three patients were treated in the 45 mg/m 2 dose level and 5 patients were treated in the 75 mg/m 2 dose level; no DLTs or grade 3–5 treatment related toxicities were observed. After a median follow-up of 5.2 months, no patients developed grade III–IV aGVHD and no patients died of aGVHD. Six out of 8 patients in the treatment group responded to treatment including two cytogenetic complete remissions, one hematologic complete remission, and three complete remissions with incomplete count recovery. In conclusion, administration of AzaC early post DLI is well tolerated and can potentially prevent GVHD after DLI. Further studies are required to evaluate the effect of azacitidine early post DLI on GVHD and GVL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Combining DSTAT with azacitidine appears feasible with no increased toxicity seen. • A 20 % response rate was observed in this patient population with HMA refractory MDS. • Mobilization of myeloblasts was not observed during the first cycle of DSTAT and azacitidine. Leukemia stem cells utilize cell adhesion molecules like CXCR4/CXCL12 to home to bone marrow stromal niches where they are maintained in a dormant, protected state. Dociparstat sodium (DSTAT, CX-01) is a low anticoagulant heparin with multiple mechanisms of action, including inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis, blocking HMGB1, and binding platelet factor 4 (PF-4). We conducted a pilot study adding DSTAT to azacitidine for patients with AML or MDS unresponsive to or relapsed after prior hypomethylating agent therapy, hypothesizing that DSTAT may improve response rates. Twenty patients were enrolled, with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and 6 cycles of prior hypomethylating agents. Among fifteen patients evaluable for response, there was 1 complete remission, and 3 marrow complete remissions, for a response rate of 27 % among evaluable patients (20 % overall). Hematologic improvement was observed in 5 additional patients. The median overall survival for all enrolled patients was 205 days (95 % CI 119–302). While cytopenias and infections were common, these were not out of proportion to what would be expected in this population of patients undergoing treatment with azacitidine alone. In summary, this trial demonstrated the feasibility of combining DSTAT with azacitidine, with several responses observed, suggesting this combination warrants further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Survival rates reported among HR-MDS patients are inconsistent across clinical studies. • Real-world OS with azacitidine is consistently shorter compared to that observed in the large pivotal trial AZA-001. • We investigated surrogate endpoints for patients with HR-MDS treated with azacitidine. • This systematic review determined clinical benchmarks for future studies of HMA-based combinations. • Benchmarks of response from 237 clinical studies included complete remission (CR) rate, marrow CR, and overall survival. The hypomethylating agent azacitidine can prolong overall survival (OS) in patients with higher risk-myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) compared to conventional regimens. However, outcomes differ largely between studies, making it challenging to determine the contribution of novel therapies added to azacitidine. Further, a discrepancy is seen between complete (CR) or partial (PR) response rates and OS improvement with azacitidine, making it challenging to rely on earlier endpoints than OS. We conducted a systematic literature search and study-level systematic review of 237 clinical studies to better understand outcomes for HR-MDS patients treated with azacitidine. Pooled marrow CR was 9% (N = 2654; 95% CI: 6–13 %), CR rate was 17 % (N = 6943; 95% CI: 15–20 %), and median OS (mOS) was 18.6 months (N = 2820; 95% CI: 15.3–21.9). A weak correlation to mOS was detected with CR rate (207 patient cohorts, Pearson's r = 0.315; P < 0.0005), and a much stronger correlation with median progression-free survival (mPFS) (r=0.88, P = 3 × 10−14). Six-months progression-free survival rates correlated with 1-year OS rates but were only infrequently reported (N = 41 patient cohorts) therefore not allowing a robust recommendation for a surrogate to the established OS endpoint. Larger patient numbers and patient-level data appear necessary, especially for designing future clinical trials using azacitidine combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) has been shown to be effective in preclinical and clinical studies for the prevention of acute GVHD (aGVHD). We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZA when given on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle for 4 cycles, starting on day +7 after allo-HCT, as well as its impact on aGVHD and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor allo-HCT. This study was a single-arm, single-center, open-label phase I-II study with a total of 15 and 38 patients enrolled in the phase I and II portions of the trial, respectively. A standard 3+3 study design was used in phase I, and all patients in phase II received AZA at the MTD determined in phase I. The MTD of AZA starting at day +7 post-transplantation was 45 mg/m 2 . Phase II of the study was halted after enrolling 38 of the planned 46 patients following an interim analysis that suggested futility. Overall, AZA at 45 mg/m 2 exhibited a side effect profile consistent with prior reports and had a minimal impact on engraftment. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant aGVHD by day +180 was 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 53.7%). The incidence of all-grade cGVHD was 61.4% (95% CI, 40.3% to 75%). At 1 year, OS was 73.7% (95% CI, 60.9% to 89.1%), and the disease relapse rate was 11.4% (95% CI, .2% to 21.3%). Our results suggest that early post-allo-HCT AZA has limited efficacy in preventing aGVHD and cGVHD but could have a beneficial effect in preventing disease relapse., (Copyright © 2023 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Physicians treating hematologic malignancies increasingly order targeted sequencing panels to interrogate recurrently mutated genes. The precise impact of these panels on clinical decision making is not well understood., Methods: Here, we report our institutional experience with a targeted 40-gene panel (MyeloSeq) that is used to generate a report for both genetic variants and variant allele frequencies for the treating physician (the limit of mutation detection is approximately one AML cell in 50)., Results: In total, 346 sequencing reports were generated for 325 patients with suspected hematologic malignancies over an 8-month period (August 2018 to April 2019). To determine the influence of genomic data on clinical care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we analyzed 122 consecutive reports from 109 patients diagnosed with AML and surveyed the treating physicians with a standardized questionnaire. The panel was ordered most commonly at diagnosis (61.5%), but was also used to assess response to therapy (22.9%) and to detect suspected relapse (15.6%). The panel was ordered at multiple timepoints during the disease course for 11% of patients. Physicians self-reported that 50 of 114 sequencing reports (44%) influenced clinical care decisions in 44 individual patients. Influences were often nuanced and extended beyond identifying actionable genetic variants with US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs., Conclusion: This study provides insights into how physicians are currently using multigene panels capable of detecting relatively rare AML cells. The most influential way to integrate these tools into clinical practice will be to perform prospective clinical trials that assess patient outcomes in response to genomically driven interventions., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Erica K. BarnellEmployment: Geneoscopy Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Geneoscopy Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Inventor of intellectual property in start-up company (Geneoscopy) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: GeneoscopyKenneth F. NewcomerEmployment: Geneoscopy (I) Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Geneoscopy (I) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Inventor of intellectual property owned by Geneoscopy (I)Zachary L. SkidmoreStock and Other Ownership Interests: Aim Immunotech, Catalyst PharmaceuticalsKilannin KrysiakConsulting or Advisory Role: Gerson Lehrman GroupLukas D. WartmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, IncyteStephen T. OhConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Novartis, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, Kartos, CTI BioPharma Corp, PharmaEssentia, Disc Medicine, Constellation Pharmaceuticals Research Funding: Incyte (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), CTI BioPharma Corp (Inst), Kartos (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Sierra Oncology (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst)John S. WelchConsulting or Advisory Role: Archer Biosciences, Agios Research Funding: Janssen Oncology (Inst), Notable Labs (Inst)Keith E. Stockerl-GoldsteinStock and Other Ownership Interests: Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Consulting or Advisory Role: Celgene Research Funding: GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, BiolineRx, Janssen Other Relationship: CellerantRavi VijConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Takeda, Genentech, AbbVie, Oncopeptides Research Funding: Takeda, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Janssen, DAVAOncology, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVieAmanda F. CashenConsulting or Advisory Role: Agios Speakers' Bureau: Novartis, CelgeneIskra PusicConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon, Incyte, SyndaxCamille N. AbboudStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie (I), Abbott Laboratories (I), Gilead Sciences (I), Bristol Myers Squibb (I), Johnson & Johnson (I) Honoraria: Cardinal Health, Dova Pharmaceuticals, NkartaTherapeutics, Archer Biosciences Research Funding: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Selvita (Inst), AlloVir (Inst), Forty-Seven (Inst)Armin GhobadiHonoraria: Kite Pharma Consulting or Advisory Role: Kite Pharma, Celgene, Amgen, Wugen Speakers' Bureau: Kite Pharma, AmgenGeoffrey L. UyConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Genentech, Jazz PharmaceuticalsMark A. SchroederConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, Dova Pharmaceuticals, Flatiron Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Partners Therapeutics, Partners Therapeutics, Pfizer Speakers' Bureau: AbbVie, Merck, TakedaJohn F. DiPersioStock and Other Ownership Interests: Magenta Therapeutics, Wugen Honoraria: Incyte Consulting or Advisory Role: Cellworks, Rivervest, Magenta Therapeutics, Incyte Research Funding: Amphivena Therapeutics (Inst), Macrogenics (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Wugen (Inst), BiolineRx (Inst), Maxcyte (Inst), Bigelow Aerospace (Inst) Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patents: CD7 and CD2 knockout for CART to CD7 and CDL; Duvelisib for treatment of cytokine release syndrome; NT-17 to enhance CART survival; Novel WU mobilizing compounds (Inst); Selection of IMPDH mutant stem cells; IFNγ, upregulate MHCII for relapsed AML; Dextran-based molecules to detect CAR-T cells; Combining integrin inhibitor with chemokine binders, 016131; JAK and calcineurin inhibition, solid organ transplant; VLA4, gro-b; Triple combination–CXCR2, VLA-4, gro-b; Targeting IFNR/CSCR3 in GvHD; WU/SLU compounds VLA4 and CXCR2 (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte, Macrogenics, Magenta TherapeuticsMary C. PolitiResearch Funding: MerckDavid H. SpencerConsulting or Advisory Role: Wugen Research Funding: IlluminaEric J. DuncavageStock and Other Ownership Interests: P&V Licensing Consulting or Advisory Role: Cofactor Genomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/317379Timothy J. LeyResearch Funding: Rigel Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Licenses for monoclonal antibodies and recombinant granzymesMeagan A. JacobyHonoraria: Takeda Research Funding: Geron (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Aprea AB (Inst), Amphivena (Inst), Janssen (Inst) No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Recent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) studies have demonstrated that tumors typically comprise a founding clone and multiple subclones (i.e., clonal heterogeneity is common). The possible combination of mutations in each tumor clone is enormous, making each tumor genetically unique. Clonal heterogeneity likely has a role in cancer progression, relapse, metastasis, and chemoresistance due to functional differences in genetically unique subclones. In current clinical practice, gene mutations are only classified as being present or absent, ignoring the clonal complexity of cancers. In this review, we address how tumor clonality is measured using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, highlight that clonal heterogeneity is common across multiple tumor types, and discuss the potential clinical implications of tumor clonal heterogeneity., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)