101. Investigation of convolutional neural networks using multiple computed tomography perfusion maps to identify infarct core in acute ischemic stroke patients
- Author
-
Ryan A. Rava, Elad I. Levy, Alexander R. Podgorsak, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Ciprian N. Ionita, Kenneth V. Snyder, Maxim Mokin, Jason M Davies, and Muhammad Waqas
- Subjects
Computed tomography perfusion ,business.industry ,Image segmentation ,Convolutional neural network ,Computer-Aided Diagnosis ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cerebral blood flow ,Sørensen–Dice coefficient ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Perfusion ,Acute ischemic stroke ,Diffusion MRI - Abstract
Purpose: To assess acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity, infarct is segmented using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) software, such as RAPID, Sphere, and Vitrea, relying on contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Since this approach is potentially patient dependent, we investigated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs) could achieve better performances without the need for contralateral hemisphere thresholds. Approach: CTP and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were retrospectively collected for 63 AIS patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak, mean-transit-time (MTT), and delay time maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. U-net shaped CNNs were developed, trained, and tested for 26 different input CTP parameter combinations. Infarct labels were segmented from DWI volumes registered with CTP volumes. Infarct volumes were reconstructed from two-dimensional CTP infarct segmentations. To remove erroneous segmentations, conditional random field (CRF) postprocessing was applied and compared with prior results. Spatial and volumetric infarct agreement was assessed between DWI and CTP (CNNs and commercial software) using median infarct difference, median absolute error, dice coefficient, positive predictive value. Results: The most accurate combination of parameters for CNN segmenting infarct using CRF postprocessing was CBF, CBV, and MTT (4.83 mL, 10.14 mL, 0.66, 0.73). Commercial software results are: RAPID = (2.25 mL, 21.48 mL, 0.63, 0.70), Sphere = (7.57 mL, 17.74 mL, 0.64, 0.70), Vitrea = (6.79 mL, 15.28 mL, 0.63, 0.72). Conclusions: Use of CNNs with multiple input perfusion parameters has shown to be accurate in segmenting infarcts and has the ability to improve clinical workflow by eliminating the need for contralateral hemisphere comparisons.
- Published
- 2021