101. Risk Factors for Elevated Intraocular Pressure on First Day Postoperative Review Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy
- Author
-
Warren P. Gillibrand, John Stephenson, Rubina Rahman, and Jonathan Marler
- Subjects
Pars plana ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraocular pressure ,genetic structures ,business.industry ,Patient demographics ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Lens Status ,Vitrectomy ,Vitreoretinal surgery ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,Elevated intraocular pressure ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Ophthalmology ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,medicine ,Tamponade ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Purpose: To assess the relationship between day 1 postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and patient demographic information, indication for vitrectomy, lens status, tamponade medium (air, perfluoroethane, sulfur hexafluoride), and laser treatment. Methods: A prospective observational study of all patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) by a single surgeon within 1 case study. All patients had IOP recorded 1 day after surgery. None of the patients had postoperative antiglaucoma medications. All patients undergoing PPV were previously pseudophakic or underwent combined surgery. Results: Of a final cohort of 161 patients, 6% had raised IOP (defined as >30 mm Hg). A parsimonious regression model showed no strong correlation between raised IOP and type of gas tamponade ( P = .028 for C2F6, P = .067 for SF6, air was the reference category) and a moderate association with the number of laser burns ( P = .067). Conclusion: The use of gas tamponade, in particular C2F6, does not constitute justification for pre/postoperative antiglaucoma prophylactic treatment. In addition, we postulate that careful consideration should be given to the frequency of laser burns during PPV.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF