101. Is CTNNB1 mutational analysis predictive for progression in patients with sporadic desmoid tumors primarily observed?
- Author
-
Marco Fiore, Federica Perrone, Sylvie Bonvalot, Cécile Le Péchoux, Axel Le Cesne, Alessandro Gronchi, Julien Domont, Rosalba Miceli, and Chiara Colombo
- Subjects
Oncology ,Mutational analysis ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,Mutation (genetic algorithm) ,medicine ,In patient ,business - Abstract
10016 Background: Recently, a wait and see (W&S) approach has been proposed for patients affected by desmoid tumor (DT). Specific CTNNB1 mutation has been correlated with higher risk of recurrence after surgical resection. Aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between CTNNB1 mutation type and time to progression in patients primarily observed (TTP). Methods: We included all consecutive patients:(1) primarily observed at the Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milano, Italy) or Institut Gustave Roussy (Paris, France) for primary sporadic DTs (2) with available FFPE preserved tissue for CTNNB1 mutational analysis, (3) with measurable disease and adequate follow-up. TTP from date of diagnosis to date of radiological (PRO-R) or symptomatic (PRO-S) progression were conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare strata. Results: A total of 79 patients (August 2002- July 2011) were included (81% female, 19% male); median age was 34 (IQ, 10-77); sites distribution: abdominal/chest wall (75%), extremity (21%), intra-abdominal (4%). CTNNB1 mutations were observed in 76% of DT samples: 41A (48%), 45F (25%), 45P (2%); 24% were WT. Median follow-up was 19 mo (IQ, 11-28). Thirty-six patients experienced progression (86% PRO-R, 14% PRO-S): 41A (47%), 45F (55%), 45P (100%), WT (26%). An inferior TTP at 36 months was observed in mutated patients vs WT, while no difference was detected for specific subtype mutated patients (WT 68%, 45F 24%, 41/45P 35%, p= 0.045). A variety of different treatments including surgery, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, antiCOX2 or persistent W&S approach were proposed at progression. Forty-two patients did not receive any treatment. Conclusions: A clear trend towards a lower risk of progression was observed in WT patients, but no difference between specific mutated patients (45F vs 41/45P) was observed. Prospective studies to eventually clarify the potential role of CTNNB1 as prognostic tool in tailoring desmoids treatment are presently underway.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF