101. Benefit of a second opinion: From metastatic disease to resectable lung cancer with sarcoid-like reaction
- Author
-
Egbert F. Smit, Emile F.I. Comans, Thomas G. Sutedja, Katrien Grünberg, Marinus A. Paul, Romane M. Schook, Pieter E. Postmus, Lyan G. Koudstaal, Pulmonary medicine, Pathology, Radiology and nuclear medicine, Cardio-thoracic surgery, and CCA - Disease profiling
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,lcsh:RC705-779 ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mediastinal lymphadenopathy ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Second opinion ,Case Report ,Disease ,lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system ,medicine.disease ,Primary tumor ,Mediastinoscopy ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Non-small cell lung cancer ,Sarcoid-like reaction ,Mediastinal enlargement ,Medicine ,Lymph ,business ,Lung cancer ,Lymph node - Abstract
Background: Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in combination with lung cancer is suggestive for lymph node metastases but can also have other origins. Case report: We describe a patient diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer presenting with parenchymal lesions and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. A second opinion including FDG-PET scan review and a mediastinoscopy followed by surgery revealed tumor specimens originating from a single primary tumor with a sarcoid-like reaction in the mediastinal lymph nodes, changing the diagnosis from metastasized to resectable lung cancer. Discussion: PET positive lesions are not always synonymous with metastatic disease in the presence of a malignant tumor. Conscientious review of FDG-PET scans and tissue sampling are therefore mandatory to determine definitive staging and subsequent interventions. © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF