Search

3143 Background: The anti-VEGFR-2 monoclonal antibody ram, alone or with paclitaxel, is a cornerstone of second-line treatment of mGC. Even if about half patients do not benefit from ram, no predictive biomarkers have been identified so far. In TCGA, VEGF-A amplification was found in 7% of cases, almost exclusively in chromosomal instability subtype. We hypothesize that VEGF-A amplification in tumor cells could lead to autocrine/paracrine stimulation of tumor growth beside angiogenesis, potentially identifying a patients’ subgroup with exceptional responses to ram. Methods: VERA was a multicentric, prospective study based on a translational hypothesis. mGC patients were included according to the following criteria: 1) complete (CR) or partial response (PR) to single-agent ram; 2) >6 months PFS to single-agent ram; 3) >10 months PFS to paclitaxel+ram. According to a Fleming single-stage design, hypothesizing a prevalence of VEGF-A amplification of 1% and 15% among all-comers and exceptional responders, 20 exceptional responders were required to reject the null hypothesis of low prevalence of VEGF-A amplification, with alpha- and beta- errors of 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. VEGF-A amplification (defined as >10% tumor cells with ≥10 VEGF-A copies, variably sized signal clusters or a ratio of VEGF-A gene to centromere of ≥2) was centrally assessed through fluorescent in situ hybridization on pre-treatment FFPE tumor tissue. Results: At 7 Italian Centers, we included 20 patients satisfying the 1st (n=1), 2nd (n=2), or 3rd (n=17) criterion. Clinical-pathological features were: M/F, 11/9; median age 63 years; gastric/GEJ, 17/3; intestinal/diffuse, 14/6, HER2+/HER2-, 4/16. Median PFS and overall survival to ram-based treatment were 15.6 and 25.7 months, with best response: CR/PR/SD, 0/10/10. VERA met its primary endpoint, revealing 3/20 (15%) tumors with VEGF-A amplification (1 case presenting big clusters, 1 small clusters and 1 with >10% tumor cells with ≥10 VEGF-A copies). Conclusions: Validation analyses of first- and second-line randomized trials could confirm VEGF-A amplification as a biomarker of long-term response to ram-based treatment in mGC patients, advancing treatment personalization.

Gastric cancer stands among the most common causes of cancer death worldwide (1). Median overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced disease is approximately 1 year and chemotherapy still represents the milestone of treatment in most patients (2). While first-line chemotherapy has a well-established role in gastric cancer management, during the past few years several trials clearly demonstrated a significant OS benefit for second-line therapy compared with best supportive care (BSC) alone (3); however, as the gain in survival is at best modest in absolute terms, a careful clinical selection is needed to identify patients who could benefit from salvage therapies (4). Moreover, no standard treatment exists after second-line failure. Thus, searching for new therapeutic opportunities in pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients is imperative for researchers and clinicians.

Aim: To evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of gastrectomy in asymptomatic metastatic esophago-gastric cancer. Patients & methods: Five hundred and thirteen patients were included. The role of surgery and other clinico-pathological factors was evaluated by univariate and Cox regression analyses. OS was the primary end point. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that gastrectomy was a predictor of longer OS (p 0.05). Conclusion: Palliative gastrectomy might play a role in asymptomatic metastatic esophago-gastric cancer patients with good performance status who received benefit from first-line chemotherapy. Future prospective trials integrating tumor biology among inclusion criteria may help defining the optimal candidates.

Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (OSCC) but with poor results. Attempts to improve patient outcome have been made by introducing chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or both (CRT). However, randomized comparisons for all these strategies are not always available. Patients and methods We conducted an extensive literature search for studies comparing surgery with multimodality treatment (i.e. [neo-]adjuvant CT or RT or CRT or definitive CRT). Network meta-analysis was performed in a Bayesian framewor and node-split models were built to assess inconsistency. Results Twenty-five trials including a total of 3866 OSCC patients were included. Neoadjuvant CRT was associated with the most robust survival advantage across different multimodality treatment options (HR 0.73; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.63–0.86). Definitive CRT was also significantly more effective than surgery but with greater uncertainties (HR 0.62; 95%CrI 0.41–0.96). Neoadjuvant CT (HR 0.90; 95%CrI 0.76–1.07) and adjuvant CRT (HR 1.00; 95%CrI 0.70–1.40) are associated with a non-significant benefit. Conclusions To date, neoadjuvant CRT seems to represent the best approach to maximize the benefit of a multimodality approach.

Sarcopenia is a complex syndrome characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. Malignancy is a major determinant of sarcopenia, and gastric cancer (GC) is among the most common causes of this phenomenon. As sarcopenia is a well-recognized poor prognostic feature in GC and has been associated with worse tolerance of surgical and medical treatments, members of the multidisciplinary team should be aware of the clinical relevance, pathogenic mechanisms, and potential treatments for this syndrome. The importance of sarcopenia is often underestimated in everyday practice and clinical trials, particularly among elderly or fragile patients. As treatment options are improving in all disease stages, deeper knowledge and greater attention to the metabolic balance in GC patients could further increase the benefit of novel therapeutic strategies and dramatically impact on quality of life. In this review, we describe the role of sarcopenia in different phases of GC progression. Our aim is to provide oncologists and surgeons dealing with GC patients with a useful tool for comprehensive assessment and timely management of this potentially life-threatening condition.

Aim To assess the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and methods Thirty-three consecutive patients with pulmonary metastases from CRC who received SBRT were included in the analysis. The primary endpoints were local and systemic progression-free survival, a secondary endpoint was the safety profile of SBRT. Results A total of 56 lesions were treated with SBRT. A single nodule was treated in 15 patients, two in 13 and three in five. The radiotherapy dose and the adopted fractionations were 24-27 Gy as a single fraction for 40 lesions and 27-42 Gy in three fractions (2-3 times a week) for the other 16 lesions. After a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range=1.3-45.7 months), the median progression-free survival of the irradiated sites was 13.4 months. Conclusion SBRT can be considered as local therapy in patients with lung metastases from CRC.

Tumor angiogenesis and metastatic spreading are two highly interconnected phenomena, which contribute to cancer-associated deaths. Thus, the identification of novel strategies to target angiogenesis and metastatic spreading is crucial. Polycomb genes are a set of epigenetic effectors, structured in multimeric repressive complexes. EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which methylates histone H3 lysine 27, thereby silencing several tumor-suppressor genes. EZH2 is essential for cancer stem cell self-renewal. Interestingly, cancer stem cells are thought to be the seeds of metastatic spreading and are able to differentiate into tumor-associated endothelial cells. Pre-clinical studies showed that EZH2 is able to silence several anti-metastatic genes (e.g., E-cadherin and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases), thereby favoring cell invasion and anchorage-independent growth. In addition, EZH2 seems to play a crucial role in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis. High EZH2 expression predicts poor prognosis, high grade, and high stage in several cancer types. Recently, a small molecule inhibitor of PRC2 (DZNeP) demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, DZNeP was able to inhibit cancer cell invasion and tumor angiogenesis in prostate and brain cancers, respectively. At tumor-inhibiting doses, DZNeP is not harmful for non-transformed cells. In the present manuscript, we review current evidence supporting a role of EZH2 in metastatic spreading and tumor angiogenesis. Using Oncomine datasets, we show that DZNeP targets are specifically silenced in some metastatic cancers, and some of them may inhibit angiogenesis. Based on this evidence, we propose the development of EZH2 inhibitors as anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic therapy.

Purpose FOLFOXIRI demonstrated higher efficacy compared to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the outcome of second-line treatments among 196 patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI in three consecutive trials conducted by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest group. Patients and Methods One hundred seventy-two of 196 patients so far progressed and 136 (79%) received second-line therapies: 32 (24%) were rechallenged with FOLFOXIRI, 52 (38%) were treated with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based doublets, and 52 (38%) received fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C or single-agent chemotherapy. Only 10 patients received bevacizumab (3) or cetuximab (7) with chemotherapy. Activity and efficacy data were collected and subgroup analyses were performed according to the regimen administered. Results Overall response rate (RR) was 23%; median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. At an exploratory subgroup analysis, retreatment with FOLFOXIRI was associated with longer PFS (8.2 versus 6.3 months; P = .003, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61) and OS (19.3 versus 14.0 months; P = .02, HR = 0.57) compared with doublets; single-agent chemotherapy or fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C was significantly lower in terms of RR (8%), PFS (3.0 months), and OS (8.7 months) compared with FOLFOXIRI or doublets. Conclusions First-line FOLFOXIRI does not impair the efficacy of second-line treatments. In some patients rechallenge with FOLFOXIRI may represent a valid option, although potential imbalances in prognostic factors due to better patient selection should be considered.

Background Previous studies investigating the prognostic role of mucinous histology of colorectal cancer produced conflicting results. This retrospective analysis was carried out in order to explore whether mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) is associated with a comparatively worse prognosis than that of nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMC) for patients undergoing curative resection for stage II and III colon cancer. Patients and methods: This study involved 1025 unselected patients who underwent curative surgery for sporadic colon cancer and follow-up procedures at six different oncology departments. Results MCs accounted for 17.4% (n = 178) of tumours. Patients with MC had 5- and 8-year overall survival rates of 78.6% and 68.8%, respectively, compared with 72.3% and 63.8%, respectively, for patients with nonmucinous tumours. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the clinically significant prognostic factors were stage of disease and adjuvant chemotherapy. No statistically significant interaction between mucinous histology and adjuvant chemotherapy was found. Conclusions For patients with stage II and III colon cancer who underwent curative surgery, mucinous histology has no significant correlation with prognosis compared with NMC. This retrospective analysis suggests a comparable benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for MC compared with NMC.

Summary Background The FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) regimen has been shown to be better than FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, folinate, and irinotecan) in a phase 3 trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of various studies have shown that the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy increases treatment efficacy. We therefore assessed the safety and activity of the combination of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods In a phase 2 study, patients (aged 18–75 years) with colorectal cancer, which was judged to be unresectable for metastatic disease, were given the combination of intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) and intravenous FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 165 mg/m 2 on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 on day 1, folinate 200 mg/m 2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 3200 mg/m 2 for 48 h continuous infusion starting on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks) as first-line treatment in seven centres in Italy. Induction treatment (FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab) was administered for a maximum of 6 months, followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 10 months from study entry in the intention-to-treat population. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01163396. Findings From July 2, 2007, to April 1, 2008, 57 patients were enrolled; all patients were assessed for safety and efficacy. Median follow-up time was 28·8 months (95% CI 24·9–32·5). PFS at 10 months was 74% (95% CI 62–85). Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events during induction treatment were neutropenia (n=28 [49%], including one case of febrile neutropenia), diarrhoea (n=8 [14%]), stomatitis (n=2 [4%]), neurotoxicity (n=1 [2%]), deep-vein thrombosis (n=4 [7%]), and hypertension (n=6 [11%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Six serious adverse events occurred during the induction treatment: febrile neutropenia (n=1 [2%]), grade 3 diarrhoea with dehydration (n=2 [4%]), grade 4 stomatitis (n=1 [2%]), grade 4 hypertension (n=1 [2%]), and fluorouracil-related cardiac ischaemia (n=1 [2%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events noted in the 37 patients who received maintenance treatment were hypertension (n=5 [14%]) and neurotoxicity (n=3 [8%]). One case of acute myocardial infarction due to coronary thrombosis was noted during the maintenance treatment. Interpretation Bevacizumab can be safely used with FOLFOXIRI without causing unforeseen adverse events. Treatment achieved promising results in terms of PFS. A phase 3 study for the comparison of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab is in progress. Funding Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest, ARCO Foundation, and Roche.

4062Background: Pembro has shown promising antitumor activity in patients (pts) with pretreated G/GEJ cancer. KEYNOTE-061 (NCT02370498) was a global phase 3 study of pembro vs PTX for previously tr...

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway represents a successful strategy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the approval of the first antiangiogenic drug, the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, a number of other molecules have been tested in preliminary trials and are currently under investigation in phase III randomized studies. At present, no clinical tools are available to select patients more likely to benefit from VEGF pathway inhibitors nor to exclude those who are proner to suffer from specific adverse events, so that almost all mCRC patients are potentially candidate to receive an antiangiogenic-containing regimen. To overcome this substantial limit, a consistent aid is awaited by the identification of molecular tools of selection. Retrospective analyses and translational studies have been conducted and are currently ongoing to address this major question, investigating molecular, biological and genetic markers. This review aims at resuming the state-of-the-art about the role of VEGF pathway inhibitors in the treatment of mCRC and at focusing on the present knowledge about candidate biomarkers as predictors of activity and toxicity.

394 Background: FOLFIRINOX achieved a significant step forward in the treatment of mPC. However, patient prognosis remains dismal, and better discrimination of outcomes could be useful to guide clinical decision-making and patient stratification. We aimed at developing and validating a prognostic model and nomogram able to predict the risk of early death (within 6 months post-treatment initiation) in mPC pts treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Data from 137 mPC treated with the GONO FOLFOXIRI schedule at a single institution were used as developing set. Univariate associations with death in the first 6 months after treatment initiation were investigated. Based on the multivariate model, a nomogram was developed assigning points equal to its weighted relevance to each significant variable. The nomogram was externally validated on an independent, parallel cohort of 206 mPC pts treated with FOLFIRINOX at different Italian and French centers. Predictive ability was assessed with the concordance index (C-index) and visual inspection of the calibration plot. Results: 4 out of the 27 considered variables were retained in the multivariable model: ECOG performance status (PS), neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR), liver metastases, and basal serum CA19.9. The nomogram demonstrated adequate discriminative ability in the validation set with a C-index of 0.754. When grouped in different prognostic categories (according to none, 1, 2, or > 2 risk factors), pts included in our study showed significantly different outcomes with median OS ranging from 6.2 ( > 2 risk factors) to 19.5 months (no risk factors, P < 0.05). Conclusions: PS, NLR, liver metastasis, and CA19.9 were the major determinants of 6-month OS. Our nomogram may help clinicians in discussing with pts the benefits and risks of therapy, and in designing future clinical trials. A visual format of the nomogram will be presented. [Table: see text]

Treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have rapidly increased in the past years, but 50 - 70% of mCRC patients are still unlikely to undergo radical resection of metastases and are candidates for palliative therapy only.Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have widened the chemotherapy alternatives available in this setting and effective targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor have further improved treatment efficacy. This review covers the main areas of debate in the optimal treatment of unresectable mCRC patients, focusing on the implications for everyday clinical practice and future research of the most relevant clinical trials and molecular investigations published from 1999 to 2009.Insights into treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review.'One size fits all' can not longer be considered an adequate approach to unresectable mCRC, and treatment with both chemotherapy and biologic agents should be guided by prognostic and predictive factors in order to maximize the benefit while reducing futile toxicities.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy containing irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin in patients with advanced mucinous colorectal cancer. Prognostic factors associated with response rate and survival were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic and/or Cox proportional hazards analyses. The population included 255 patients, of whom 49 (19%) had mucinous and 206 (81%) had non-mucinous colorectal cancer. The overall response rates for mucinous and non-mucinous tumours were 18.4 (95% CI, 7.5-29.2%) and 49% (95% CI, 42.2-55.8%), respectively (P=0.0002). After a median follow-up of 45 months, median overall survival for the mucinous patients was 14.0 months compared with 23.4 months for the non-mucinous group (hazard ratio (HR), 1.74; CI 95%, 1.27-3.31; P=0.0034). After adjustment for significant features by multivariate Cox regression analysis, mucinous histology was associated with poor overall survival (HR, 1.593, 95% CI, 1.05-2.40; P=0.0267), together with performance status ECOG 2, number of metastatic sitesor =2, and peritoneal metastases. This retrospective analysis shows that patients with mucinous colorectal cancer have poor responsiveness to oxaliplatin/irinotecan-based first-line combination chemotherapy and an unfavourable prognosis compared with non-mucinous colorectal cancer patients.

Background: FOLFIRINOX is a standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC) and no accepted second-line regimen exists. Material & methods: We enrolled 71 aPC patients progressed to modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) treated with second-line chemotherapy. Results: Five partial responses (7.1%) and 19 (27.1%) disease stabilizations were reported. After a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median progression-free survival was 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.1–2.9 months) and median overall survival was 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.3–7.1 months). At multivariate analysis, CA19.9 level ≥59 upper normal limit resulted associated with worse survival (hazard ratio: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.12–4.78; p = 0.023). Conclusion: Salvage chemotherapy could be useful for a subgroup of aPC patients. Prognostic factors might be helpful to identify patients with greater benefit.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the combination of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as third-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients pretreated with platinum derivatives, fluoropyrimidines, and taxanes. Methods: We prospectively collected data of mGC patients treated with third-line FOLFIRI at our institution from 2009 to 2014. Eligible patients should be treated with a fluoropyrimidine-platinum first-line CT and a subsequent taxane-based second-line CT. FOLFIRI consisted of irinotecan 180 mg/m2 and leucovorin 200 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil 2,800 mg/m2 (administered as 48-hour i.v. continuous infusion from day 1 to 3), with cycles repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate (RR) was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.0, while progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 33 patients were included. The majority (97%) had good performance status (0-1 according to ECOG), while median PFS after first-line and second-line CT was 5.2 and 4.4 months, respectively. Two patients experienced an objective response (RR: 6%), while 14 patients achieved disease stabilization (disease control rate: 42%). Median PFS and OS from the start of third-line CT were 3.3 and 7.5 months, respectively. Hematological and nonhematological grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon and included neutropenia (6.1%), diarrhea (9.1%), vomiting (3%), and asthenia (3%). Febrile neutropenia was not reported. Conclusions: Third-line CT with FOLFIRI may be an option in heavily pretreated mGC patients with preserved performance status and organ function. This regimen has a favorable safety profile, and signs of activity have been observed after standard first- and second-line CT.

HER-2 (ErbB-2, c-erbB2 or Her2/neu), a member of the HER-family, is directly involved in the pathogenesis and progression of several human cancers; as such, it is also often considered as a poor prognostic factor. Following the revolutionary impact of anti-HER-2 therapy in breast cancer patients, the role of HER-2 and its blockade has also been extensively evaluated in other tumor types, including gastric and colorectal adenocarcinoma. The aims of this review are to recall the important results achieved with the use of HER-2 inhibitors in both gastric and colorectal cancer, and to discuss on the updates available on the role of HER-2 as prognostic and predictive factor in these malignancies.

Background After progression to a standard first-line platinum and gemcitabine combination (GP), there is no established second-line therapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTC). Indeed, literature data suggest limited activity of most second-line agents evaluated so far. Methods We collected a large retrospective series of aBTC patients treated with second-line chemotherapy after progression to a first-line GP regimen at different Italian institutions. We then pooled the data with those reported in previous studies, which were identified with a Medline search and the on-line abstract datasets of major international oncology meetings. Results A total of 174 patients were included in the multicenter survey: response rate (RR) with second-line chemotherapy was low (3.4 %), with median PFS and OS of 3.0 months and 6.6 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis, preserved performance status, low CA19.9 levels and absence of distant metastases were favorable prognostic factors. Data from other five presented or published series were identified, for a total of 499 patients included in the pooled analysis. The results confirmed marginal activity of second-line chemotherapy (RR: 10.2 %), with limited efficacy in unselected patient populations (median PFS: 3.1 months; median OS: 6.3 months). Conclusions The current analysis highlights the limited value of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line GP combination in aBTC. While waiting for effective biologic agents in this setting, ongoing randomized trials will identify the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen and validate prognostic factors for individual patient management.

Background\ud The enhancer of zeste-homolog 2 (EZH2) is involved in cancer development through gene silencing by trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3). The C/C genotype for the EZH2 rs3757441 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is linked with poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but molecular and pathological characterization of this SNP is lacking. \ud Methods\ud 119 primary CRCs were analyzed. SNP was evaluated by real-time PCR from colonic healthy tissue, while EZH2 and H3K27me3 expression were studied by immunohistochemistry. We primarily looked for correlation between EZH2 rs3757441 genotypes and EZH2/H3K27me3 expression. Potential associations between EZH2/H3K27me3 expression and clinico-pathological features or KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15 mutations were secondary endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square test, T-test or ANOVA. \ud Results\ud The C/C genotype was significantly associated with higher EZH2 (100 vs. 44 %; P = 0.019) and H3K27me3 (100 vs. 38 %; P = 0.009) staining intensity compared with C/T and T/T. EZH2 3+ staining significantly correlated with stronger H3K27me3 expression (P = 0.039). KRAS and BRAF mutations were not associated with EZH2 or H3K27me3 expression. \ud Conclusion\ud EZH2 rs3757441 C/C genotype is associated with stronger EZH2 and H3K27me3 immunoreactivity in primary CRC: this SNP may serve as a promising biomarker for EZH2-targeting agents and may add independent information to KRAS and BRAF testing.

There is currently no standard treatment strategy for patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer experiencing progression after two or more lines of chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of apatinib, a novel vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma for whom at least two lines of prior chemotherapy had failed.This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Patients from 32 centers in China with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, for whom two or more prior lines of chemotherapy had failed, were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to oral apatinib 850 mg or placebo once daily. The primary end points were overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Between January 2011 and November 2012, 267 patients were enrolled. Median OS was significantly improved in the apatinib group compared with the placebo group (6.5 months; 95% CI, 4.8 to 7.6 v 4.7 months; 95% CI, 3.6 to 5.4; P = .0149; hazard ratio, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.537 to 0.937; P = .0156). Similarly, apatinib significantly prolonged median PFS compared with placebo (2.6 months; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.9 v 1.8 months; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9; P.001; hazard ratio, 0.444; 95% CI, 0.331 to 0.595; P.001). The most common grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, proteinuria, and hypertension.These data show that apatinib treatment significantly improved OS and PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy.

The BEBYP trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluating the continuation or reintroduction of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in mCRC patients progressed to a first-line therapy containing bevacizumab. The primary end point was PFS. Despite some limitations, mainly due to the premature interruption, the study met its primary end point. Background The combination of bevacizumab with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy is a standard first-line treatment option in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied the efficacy of continuing or reintroducing bevacizumab in combination with second-line chemotherapy after progression to bevacizumab-based first-line therapy. Patients and methods In this phase III study, patients with mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomized to receive in second-line mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFIRI (depending on first-line regimen) with or without bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) for progression of 0.70 with anα andβ error of 0.05 and 0.20, respectively, 262 patients were required. Results In consideration of the results of the ML18147 trial, the study was prematurely stopped. Between April 2008 and May 2012, a total of 185 patients were randomized. Bevacizumab-free interval was longer than 3 months in 43% of patients in chemotherapy alone arm and in 50% of patients in the bevacizumab arm. At a median follow-up of 45.3 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the chemotherapy group and 6.8 months in the bevacizumab group [adjusted HR=0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.95; stratified log-rankP = 0.010]. Subgroup analyses showed a consistent benefit in all subgroups analyzed and in particular in patients who had continued or reintroduced bevacizumab. An improved overall survival was also observed in the bevacizumab arm (adjusted HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.56–1.06; stratified log-rankP = 0.043). Responses (RECIST 1.0) were similar in the chemotherapy and bevacizumab groups (17% and 21%;P = 0.573). Toxicity profile was consistent with previously reported data. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the continuation or the reintroduction of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy beyond first progression improves the outcome and supports the use of this strategy in the treatment of mCRC. Clinical Trials.gov number NCT00720512.

e15666 Background: Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is a crucial angiogenic factor. By binding to its receptor Tie2, Ang-2 cooperates with the VEGF pathway to maintain normal physiological functions. In the presence of VEGF, Ang-2 destabilizes blood vessels and promotes vascular sprouting. In cancers, Ang-2 is linked to not only angiogenesis but also invasive and metastatic phenotypes. Although sorafenib exerts no significant activity against Tie2, the predictive value of Ang-2 has been explored in 2 studies. Llovet et al conducted a large biomarker study based on SHARP study. The authors found that a high baseline plasma Ang-2 level was an independent factor for poorer OS but not for reduced sorafenib efficacy. Polymorphism analysis seems to have more advantages than protein or gene expression analysis. Gene expression analysis is performed on biological material collected at a specific time in the natural history of the disease. It is also subject to the influence of a number of laboratory biases. Conversely, polymorphism analysis can be performed at any time during the course of the disease, is not substantially influenced by laboratory biases and is less expensive. In our study we analysed the role of ANG-2 polymorphisms in relation to clinical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Methods: We analyzed 135 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Peripheral blood samples or FFPE tumor tissues were available for DNA extraction and genotyping analysis. Nine Ang-2 polymorphisms were analyzed by direct sequencing or Real Time PCR method. Results: With regard to Ang4 rs55633437 was observed that patients carrying the allele GG were associated with a better PFS and OS. The variants GG were associated with a median OS of 16.9 months vs 6.5 months of variants GT and TT (p = 0.016). The variants GT and TT were associated with a median PFS of 2.94 months vs 4.67 months of variants GG (p = 0.03). These data were confirmed by multivariate analysis Conclusions: Ang4 rs55633437 could represent prognostic markers in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

e15777 Background: FOLFIRINOX is a reasonable option in LAPC. GONO FOLFOXIRI has been shown to provide similar efficacy in advanced disease. ETS and DoR, emerging as relevant endpoints in colorectal cancer, have been rarely investigated in LAPC. Methods: Unresectable LAPC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI were identified. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed every 8 weeks; after that, multidisciplinary team assessed resectability. ETS was defined as the reduction of ≥20% of target lesions’ diameters at first evaluation. DoR was the % of maximal tumor shrinkage at the nadir compared to baseline. Primary endpoint was the correlation of ETS and DoR with radical (R0) resection. Secondary endpoints were correlation of ETS and DoR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Radiologist was blinded to survival data. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and chi-square tests were applied. Results: Sixty pts were included. Median age was 62 years (range: 34-74), tumor location was head in 68% and body-tail in 32%. At a median follow-up of 26.9 months, response rate was 37%, median OS and PFS were 15.7 and 10.3 months, respectively. Thirty patients (50%) underwent R0 surgery after chemotherapy. Two pts died due to early surgical complication and were censored at the date of surgery for survival analyses. Among 55 evaluable pts, ETS was reached in 19 pts and median DoR was -17% (range: -65 to +100). A strong association between ETS (p = 0.0002) and DoR (p < 0.0001) with R0 resection was observed. In the overall population, ETS was significantly associated with better PFS (14.5 vs 9.4 months, p = 0.037), while no difference in OS was shown (p = 0.63). DoR was significantly associated both with PFS (13.6 vs 7.8 months, p = 0.014) and OS (19.8 vs 14.5 months, p = 0.047). Conclusions: FOLFOXIRI may allow achieving resectability in selected pts. ETS and DoR are significantly associated with R0 resection. Maximizing response with active regimens could be an effective strategy in LAPC. Further validation of ETS and DoR as surrogate endpoints in larger prospective series is required.

e15754 Background: Elevated pre-treatment NLR is a well-known poor prognostic factor in several tumours, including aPC. However, the role of NLR changes during first-line chemotherapy is less investigated. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated aPC patients (pts) treated with FOLFOXIRI (infusional 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan). NLR was calculated before the first (NLR-0) and the fourth (NLR-3) cycle, high NLR being defined as > 4. We evaluated the correlation between NLR change and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and disease-control-rate (DCR). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and chi-square tests were applied. Multivariate analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Ninety-four pts were evaluable. Median age was 62 years; at diagnosis, 38 (40.4%) pts had unresectable stage III and 56 (59.6%) had stage IV disease. In the overall population, median PFS (mPFS) and OS (mOS) were 8.0 and 12.9 months, respectively. NLR-0 was significantly associated with poor prognosis: among the 12 pts with NLR-0 > 4 mOS was 5.1 months compared with 13.5 months for the 82 pts with NLR-0 ≤4 (p < 0.001). As regards NLR dynamics, NLR-3 remained high or was increased (H/I) in 5 pts (5.3%) while was stably low or decreased (L/D) in 89 pts (94.7%). mOS was 5.1 months (95%CI 0.4-9.8) in H/I and 13.5 months (95%CI 10.9-16.1) in L/D (p < 0.001) pts. The same association was found for PFS, with 4.7 (95%CI 2.1-7.3) vs 8.3 months (95%CI 6.2-10.4, p = 0.004), respectively, but not for RR and DCR. At multivariate analysis, NLR change was confirmed as independent predictor of OS (HR 6.854, 95%CI 2.109-22.269, p = 0.001) and, when added to performance status, liver metastases and NLR-0, allowed a better risk stratification in good (no negative factors), intermediate (1-2 factors) and poor (3-4 factors) risk groups, with mOS of 18.0, 10.0 and 5.1 months, respectively (p = 0.012). Conclusions: Not only NLR-0, but also changes after 3 cycles of first-line FOLFOXIRI could predict OS in aPC pts. Early variations in NLR might be a cheap, reproducible and useful factor to predict prognosis and to better refine treatment strategy.

e15719 Background: After the intensification of first-line treatment in metastatic PC the number of patients fit and able to receive a SL treatment is increasing; despite these results, the choice of SL chemotherapy remains a challenging issue. The role of OXA in SL setting has given conflicting results in CONKO-003 and PANCREOX trials; the reasons of this inconsistency are difficult to understand. Methods: In order to detect a possible advantage from the use of oxaliplatin in SL, we pooled together the results of randomized phase II/III studies adding OXA to fluoropyrimidines after a gemcitabine-based first-line. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted, while the number of events was used for RR to determine odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95%CIs. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used as appropriate, on the basis of the evidence of a non-significant or significant heterogeneity among trials, respectively. The Review Manager software was used (version 5.3). Results: Three studies were identified; main characteristics and results are summarized in the table. No benefit in overall survival derived from the use of OXA (HR 1.03, 95% CI, 0.64-1.67; p=0.90) but significant heterogeneity was reported (p=0.003); the addition of OXA produced a significant benefit in terms of PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97; p=0.02) with a higher chance of response (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.24; P=0.05). Interestingly heterogeneity between trials was less evident in PFS and RR than in OS suggesting that this could be a confounding element in the interpretation of data. Conclusions: The reasons of conflicting results concerning the use of oxaliplatin doublets in SL setting are not clear. Given the recent advances in first-line setting, it would be interesting to identify an optimal sequential strategy, hopefully in a personalized approach. [Table: see text]

e15794 Background: Current treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, and CA19-9 is the only approved biomarker to monitor tumor response. However, CA19-9 has several limitations (i.e. sensitivity and specificity), highlighting the need for new biomarkers. Being the majority of PDAC (75-95%) KRAS mutated (mutKRAS), the present study developed an analysis tool based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor the variation of mutKRAS in PDAC undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Early variation of ctDNA mutKRAS after 15 days of treatment was correlated with response to therapy. Methods: Three ml of plasma were collected from patients with PDAC undergoing first-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel. Patients underwent standard disease evaluation by imaging according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Blood samples were drawn prior to cycle 1, after 14 days and at each radiological evaluation. ctDNA was extracted using a QIAmp Circulating nucleic acid Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and the KRAS codon 12 and p.G13D analysis was performed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR, BioRad, Hercules, CA). Results: A total of 27 patients with locally advanced (15%) and metastatic (85%) PDAC were included in this study. mutKRAS in ctDNA was detected in 19 patients (70.3%) at baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in median PFS and OS in patients with baseline positive or negative ctDNA mutKRAS (p = 0.15). However, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with increase vs. stability/reduction of ctDNA at the 14 day-evaluation (median PFS: 2.5 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.03; median OS: 9 vs 11.5 months p = 0.009). The imaging evaluation performed at 2 months after initiation of therapy demonstrated that all patients with an increase in ctDNA at 14 days had radiological progression of disease. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study support the use of ctDNA as a new marker for monitoring treatment outcome and disease progression in PDAC, suggesting that ctDNA mutKRAS is a non-invasive predictive factor of response in PDAC.

e15684 Background: In 2015 we published a paper where we have assessed the outcome of patient with HCC treated with metformin(M)and sorafenib(S). The data show that the concomitant use of S and m was associated with a lower PFS and OS respect for patients receiving S alone. The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic significance of m in patients with HCC treated with S. Methods: 280 patients with HCC consecutively treated with S twice daily between March 2008 and August 2016 were included in the study. Patients who had been taking insulin (I) for at least 5 years at the time of the HCC diagnosis were considered “ patients with diabetes treated with I,” whereas those who had been on m at for at least 5 years when HCC was diagnosed were considered “ patients with diabetes treated with M.” Results: In patients treated chronically with m the treatment with S was associated with a median PFS of 1.9 months (95% CI 1.8-2.3) compared to 3.7 months (95% CI 3.1-4.6) for patients without DM2 and compared to 8.4 months (95% CI 5.3-11.4) for patients treatment chronically with I (P < 0.0001). In patients treated chronically with m the treatment with sorafenib was associated with a median OS of 6.6 months (95% CI 4.6-8.7) compared to 10.8 months (95% CI 9.0-13.1) for patients without DM2 and compared to 16.6 months (95% CI 14.5-25.5) for patients treatment chronically with I (P = 0.0001). Metformin effects on clinical outcome were also investigated in relation to ORR. Patients treated chronically with metformin showed a higher percentage of progression at the first CT re-evaluation than those patients treatment with I and patients without DM2 (75.8% vs. 14.7% vs 38,8%, respectively). Considering the overall population, the risk of progression, was higher in DM2 patients taking m compared with patients without DM2 (HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.28-2.8,). Regarding the risk of survival, similar results were observed (HR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.14-2.55). Conclusions: These results confirm an increased tumor aggressiveness and resistance to S in patients treated with m cronicaly.Molecular alterations in transporter genes or transcription factors involved in m molecular action and pharmacokinetics could contribute to a different response to these drugs combination.

The last two decades of molecular biology research have revealed that cancer is not simply a genetic disease. Epigenetic alterations, ranging from DNA methylation to histone post-translational modifications, deeply interact with gene mutations, amplifications and deletions. It has been long debated whether epigenetic deregulations precede the appearance of somatic mutations, or if they are simply an "epi-phenomenon" of genetic instability.

Despite advances in the management of patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC), prognosis remains largely unsatisfactory due to a high rate of distant relapse. In fact, currently available neoadjuvant protocols, represented by fluoropyrimidine-based chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) or short-course RT, together with improved surgical techniques, have largely reduced the risk of local relapse, with limited impact on distant recurrence. Available results of phase III trials with additional cytotoxic agents combined with standard CT-RT are disappointing, as no significant reduction in the risk of recurrence has been demonstrated. In order to improve the control of micrometastatic disease, integrating targeted agents into neoadjuvant treatment protocols thus offers a rational approach. In particular, the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab has demonstrated synergistic activity with both CT and RT in pre-clinical and clinical models, and thus may represent a suitable companion in the neoadjuvant treatment of LARC. Preliminary results of phase I-II clinical studies are promising and suggest potential clinical parameters and molecular predictive biomarkers useful for patient selection: treatment personalization is indeed the key in order to maximize the benefit while reducing the risk of more complex neoadjuvant treatment schedules.

ABSTRACT Prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor and is largely influenced by associated liver comorbidities. Moreover, effective treatment alternatives are limited; with the exception of the multitargeted inhibitor sorafenib, established options in the treatment of advanced HCC no longer amenable with ablative or locoregional procedures are lacking. In light of the limited efficacy of chemotherapy in this setting, great efforts have been made in the definition of targetable molecular pathways with a central role in the progression of HCC. Targeting angiogenesis, growth factor receptors, intracellular transduction pathways, or mechanisms of gene-expression regulation represents the main way to improve patient outcome. At the same time, identifying clinical and biological factors, which may help selecting patients with higher chances of benefit, is essential in order to hasten drug development and maximize treatment efficacy.

We have read with great interest the recent paper by Lamarca et al. [1], in which the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the level of evidence behind the use of second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). The authors collected data of 761 patients from 14 phase II trials and 9 retrospective analyses, reporting a mean overall survival (OS) of 7.2 months and a mean progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.2 months. Response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 7.7% and 49.5%, respectively, suggesting that a cohort of aBTC patients may benefit from second-line chemotherapy. We really thank the authors for their efforts: due to the paucity of reliable data in this setting, the topic is of great interest.

Background: The role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model. Methods: Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models. Results: The following parameters resulted independently associated with longer OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (P

Background We aimed at investigating the outcomes of female patients with stage IIIB-IV adenocarcinoma of the lung according to EGFR and K-Ras mutational status. Methods One hundred and three consecutive female patients genotyped at a single Italian Institution were analyzed. Patients were planned to receive first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) and a salvage treatment with anti-EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was proposed irrespective of tumor mutational status. EGFR (exons 18–21) and K-Ras (exon 2, codons 12–13) mutations were evaluated by real-time PCR and pyrosequencing. The association of mutational status with clinical variables and treatment benefit was investigated by chi-square test and log-rank test. Results EGFR and K-Ras mutations were found in 31 (30%) and 13 (15%) cases, respectively. Sixty-six patients received platinum CT: no correlation was observed between EGFR or K-Ras mutational status and response rate (RR) (p > 0.05). However, patients treated with first-line CT harboring EGFR activating mutations experienced a significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with wild-type ones (4.4 vs. 6.4 months, respectively; HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.287-0.975; p = 0.048). Thirty-nine patients received salvage treatment with erlotinib: EGFR activating mutations were significantly correlated with RR (60% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.004) and PFS (11.4 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.216-0.936; p = 0.044). Responses to erlotinib were not reported among women with K-Ras mutant tumors, while 50% of those with wild-type K-Ras achieved an objective remission (p = 0.296). Median PFS (3.5 vs. 8.8 months; HR 0.284, 95% CI 0.015-0.510; p = 0.010) and OS (3.9 vs. 19.8 months; HR 0.158, 95% CI 0.001-0.075; p

3585 Background: BRAF V600E mutation plays a negative prognostic role in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, leading to a median PFS of 4-6 months with first-line conventional treatments. Recently, results from a retrospective exploratory analysis suggested that an up-front intensive treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab could improve the outcome of BRAF mutant mCRC. Methods: Fifteen consecutive BRAF mutant mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab were included in a validation set. The primary endpoint was 6-months progression free rate (6m-PFR). Secondary endpoints were: overall survival, response rate and the pooled analysis of all main outcome parameters in both the exploratory and validation set. Results: In the validation set, 11 out 15 patients included were progression-free at 6 months, for a 6m-PFR of 73.3%. Primary endpoint was met. At a median follow-up of 21.6 months, median progression-free survival was 9.2 months while median OS has not yet been reached. In the pooled data analysis of the validation set and the initial retrospective cohort 24 out 25 total patients were evaluable for response: partial or complete response was obtained in 17 (68%) and in 1 (4%) patient, respectively, for an overall response rate of 72%. At a median follow-up of 34.1 months, the pooled set of patients showed a median PFS of 11.8 months and a median OS of 23.8 months. Conclusions: These data suggest that FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab could be a reasonable option for the first-line treatment of BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Despite some advances in the past few years, the search for effective treatment modalities for advanced gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer is far from over. Available data clearly demonstrate that the development of new drugs will have little, if any, chance of success if it is not guided by in-depth knowledge of disease biology. However, using biologic agents to target key molecular pathways, such as those regulated by human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family members, may be effective. Indeed, the positive results achieved by the anti-HER2 agent trastuzumab in a phase III trial in HER2-positive patients support this approach. Many new anti-HER molecules are now under evaluation for the treatment of gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer, but so far attempts to identify reliable predictive factors from phase I and II trials have produced inconclusive results. In addition, large phase III trials are still being conducted in molecularly unselected populations. Refining patient selection is essential to maximize the benefit of targeted agents, to avoid significant toxicities and for the development of alternative therapeutic approaches in patients who have nonresponsive disease.

TO THE EDITOR: We read with great interest the recent article by Iinuma et al published in Journal of Clinical Oncology. The authors describe an innovative strategy to identify circulating cancer stem cells (C-CSCs) from blood samples in patients with radically resected nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In particular, the study suggests a prognostic value for the identification of CD133, cytokeratins (CKs) and carcinoembryonicm antigen (CEA) mRNA in selected patients with Dukes’ stage B and C. This large study (which included a validation cohort) could pave the way to better prognostic stratification, ultimately optimizing the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, similar assays may be more accurate than classical response evaluation criteria when testing cancer stem cell (CSC) –specific therapies in the advanced disease setting, as underlined in the accompanying editorial. As we have recently suggested, CSCspecific assays may constitute the backbone of next-generation pharmacogenomics.

Background Scarce data are available about safety and efficacy of cetuximab in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Patients and methods We retrospectively analysed 54 irinotecan-refractory mCRC patients aged≥70 years treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan and evaluated clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status. Results Median age was 73 years (70–82). Main grade 3–4 toxicities were skin rash (15%), diarrhea (19%) and neutropenia (13%). Irinotecan dose reduction was necessary in 39% of patients. Fifty-two (96%) patients were analysed for KRAS and BRAF status. The 29 KRAS wild-type patients achieved better RR (31% vs 4%; p =0.030) and median PFS (4.21 months vs 3.95 months; p =0.034; HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27–0.95) when compared with KRAS mutated ones. RR (41% vs 3%; p =0.001) and mPFS (4.57 months vs 3.78 months, p =0.001; HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19–0.66) were significantly higher among the 22 KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients compared to the 30 KRAS or BRAF mutated ones. Conclusion Cetuximab plus irinotecan has a favourable safety profile in elderly mCRC patients, but a reduced dose of irinotecan should be considered. Such a combination can be a useful option for elderly KRAS and BRAF wild-type patients.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (C) can be considered a standard option for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Irinotecan (Ir) and docetaxel (D) are active agents with no complete cross-resistance with C and 5-FU. Concomitant combination of Ir or D with C and 5-FU is feasible, but with substantial toxicities. A different way to include all active agents in first-line treatment of AGC may be to use them sequentially. We aimed to evaluate the activity and the safety profile of sequential chemotherapy with 5-FU-based doublets with C, Ir and D in the first-line treatment of AGC. We conducted a phase II study of first-line sequential chemotherapy in metastatic GC. Treatment consisted of 3 cycles of C + infused 5-FU and leucovorin (CFL) followed by 3 cycles of Ir + 5-FU/LV (IrFL) followed by 3 cycles of D + 5-FU/LV (DFL). Primary end-point was response rate. Forty-six patients were enrolled, median age 60 years, sites of disease (single/multiple) = 9/37, PS 0/1 = 27/19, gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction = 39/7. Median number of cycles was 9. Main grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37%), febrile neutropenia (2%), diarrhoea (4%), stomatitis (9%). Response rate after the planned 9 cycles was 45% (15 partial and 5 complete responses among 43 evaluable patients). Median PFS and OS: 6.8 and 11.1 months, respectively. This sequential treatment is feasible with a favourable safety profile and produced encouraging results in terms of activity and efficacy.

This Case Study describes a patient with metastatic typical carcinoid of the lung who had not responded to initial therapy with a somatostatin analog and chemotherapy (cisplatin and etoposide). She achieved an impressive and long-lasting response to the combination of capecitabine and lyposomal doxorubicin, without reporting any severe adverse effects. The authors discuss the diagnosis, examine differential diagnosis and briefly review the available treatment options in this setting. Background. A 61-year-old patient with no relevant medical or family history presented with a 2 month history of refractory dry cough that led to the diagnosis of typical carcinoid tumor of the lung metastatic to the mediastinal lymph nodes and liver. She initially received a long-acting somatostatin analog (octreotide) and chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide, which was ineffective. Investigations. Physical examination, laboratory test, chromogranin A test, CT scan, 111In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-octreotide scan, 18F-FDG-PET scan, fine-needle and tissue core liver biopsies. Diagnosis. Pulmonary spindle-cell carcinoid tumor with metastases to mediastinal lymph nodes and liver. Management. Systemic treatment with oral capecitabine (1,500 mg/m2 daily from day 1 to day 21) and intravenous liposomal doxorubicin (10 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15), both repeated every 4 weeks, administered concomitantly with long-acting octreotide 30 mg every 3 weeks. The patient achieved a significant and long-lasting response with the combination of capecitabine and liposomal doxorubicin. She reported no severe adverse effects.