Search

PURPOSE Human papillomavirus–positive oropharynx cancer incidence has increased rapidly in cohorts of US white men born during the 1930s to 1950s. It is unknown how the trajectory of the oropharynx cancer epidemic may be changing in the United States. METHODS Using US cancer registry information, we investigated whether increases in oropharynx cancer have continued into recent birth cohorts and forecasted the future burden across age, sex, and race/ethnicity subgroups. Log-linear Joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort models were used to evaluate incidence trends during 1992 to 2015 and projections through 2029. RESULTS Among white men, oropharynx cancer incidence increased rapidly in individuals born during 1939 to 1955 (5.3% per 2-year birth cohort; 95% CI, 4.8% to 5.7%), but this rate of increase significantly moderated in individuals born during 1955 to 1969 (1.7% per 2-year birth cohort; 95% CI, 1.0% to 2.4%). Should these birth-cohort trends continue, from 2016 to 2029 we forecast that incidence will increase dramatically in older white men 65 to 74 years of age (from 40.7 to 71.2 per 100,000) and 75 to 84 years of age (from 25.7 to 50.1 per 100,000), moderately in white men 55 to 64 years of age (from 40.3 to 52.0 per 100,000), and remain stable in white men 45 to 54 years of age (approximately 18 per 100,000). Accounting for population growth, we project an increase in annual number of cases in the United States from 20,124 (95% CI, 19,779 to 20,469) in 2016 to 30,629 (95% CI, 29,413 to 31,845) in 2029, primarily driven by older individuals (age ≥ 65 years; from 7,976 [95% CI, 7,782 to 8,172] to 18,072 [95% CI, 17,271 to 18,895]) and white men (from 14,453 [95% CI, 14,142 to 14,764] to 22,241 [95% CI, 21,119 to 23,364]). CONCLUSION The exponential increase in oropharynx cancer incidence in young white US men has ebbed, and modest increases are occurring/anticipated in cohorts born after 1955. Continued strong increases in incidence in cohorts born before 1955, and an approximate 50% increase in size of the US population age 65 years or older through 2029, portend a substantial shift in burden to elderly white men.

BACKGROUND The incidence of oropharynx cancers has increased substantially in the United States. However, risk stratification tools for the identification of high-risk individuals do not exist. In this study, an individualized risk prediction model was developed and validated for oropharynx cancers in the US population. METHODS A synthetic, US population-based case-control study was conducted. Oropharynx cancer cases diagnosed at Ohio State University (n = 241) were propensity-weighted to represent oropharynx cancers occurring annually in the United States during 2009-2014 (n = 12,656). Controls (n = 9327) included participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2009-2014) and represented the annual US population aged 30 to 69 years (n = 154,532,508). The individualized 1-year absolute risk of oropharynx cancer was estimated with weighted logistic regression. RESULTS The risk prediction model included age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol use, lifetime sexual partners, and oral oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status. The model had good discrimination and calibration in split-sample validation (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.97; observed/expected [O/E], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.32) and external validation (AUC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90; O/E, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77-1.39). In the US population, 1-year predicted risks of oropharynx cancer were highest for older individuals (21.1/100,000 for 65- to 69-year-olds), men (13.9/100,000), whites (10.4/100,000), smokers (18.0/100,000 for >20 pack-years), heavy alcohol users (18.4/100,000), and those with prevalent oral oncogenic HPV (140.4/100,000). The risk prediction model provided substantial risk stratification, with approximately 77% of all oropharynx cancers and approximately 99% of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers occurring in the 10% of the US population with the highest model-predicted risk. CONCLUSIONS This risk prediction model will enable the efficient design of studies to address the outstanding questions pertaining to the natural history, screening, and secondary prevention of oropharynx cancers.

Incidence of HPV(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been increasing dramatically. Although long-term survival rates for these patients are high, they often suffer from permanent radiotherapy-related morbidity. This has prompted the development of de-escalation clinical protocols to reduce morbidity. However, a subset of patients do not respond even to standard therapy and have poor outcomes. It is unclear how to properly identify and treat the high- and low-risk HPV(+) OPSCC patients. Since HPV positivity drives radiotherapy sensitivity, we hypothesized that variations in HPV biology may cause differences in treatment response and outcome. By analyzing gene expression data, we identified variations in HPV-related molecules among HPV(+) OPSCC. A subset of tumors presented a molecular profile distinct from that of typical HPV(+) tumors and exhibited poor treatment response, indicating molecular and clinical similarities with HPV(–) tumors. These molecular changes were also observed in vitro and correlated with radiation sensitivity. Finally, we developed a prognostic biomarker signature for identification of this subgroup of HPV(+) OPSCC and validated it in independent cohorts of oropharyngeal and cervical carcinomas. These findings could translate to improved patient stratification for treatment deintensification and new therapeutic approaches for treatment-resistant HPV-related cancer.

Summary Background Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab—an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor—can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity. Methods RTOG 1016 was a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 182 health-care centres in the USA and Canada. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition clinical categories T1–T2, N2a–N3 M0 or T3–T4, N0–N3 M0; Zubrod performance status 0 or 1; age at least 18 years; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive either radiotherapy plus cetuximab or radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks, and patients were stratified by T category (T1–T2 vs T3–T4), N category (N0–N2a vs N2b–N3), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤10 pack-years vs >10 pack-years). Patients were assigned to receive either intravenous cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 5–7 days before radiotherapy initiation, followed by cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly for seven doses (total 2150 mg/m2), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 of radiotherapy (total 200 mg/m2). All patients received accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 6 weeks at six fractions per week (with two fractions given on one day, at least 6 h apart). The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause, with non-inferiority margin 1·45. Primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat approach, whereby all patients meeting eligibility criteria are included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302834. Findings Between June 9, 2011, and July 31, 2014, 987 patients were enrolled, of whom 849 were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy plus cetuximab (n=425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (n=424). 399 patients assigned to receive cetuximab and 406 patients assigned to receive cisplatin were subsequently eligible. After median follow-up duration of 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·45, one-sided 95% upper CI 1·94; p=0·5056 for non-inferiority; one-sided log-rank p=0·0163). Estimated 5-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·4–82·5) in the cetuximab group versus 84·6% (80·6–88·6) in the cisplatin group. Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95% CI 1·29–2·29; p=0·0002; 5-year progression-free survival 67·3%, 95% CI 62·4–72·2 vs 78·4%, 73·8–83·0), and locoregional failure was significantly higher in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 2·05, 95% CI 1·35–3·10; 5-year proportions 17·3%, 95% CI 13·7–21·4 vs 9·9%, 6·9–13·6). Proportions of acute moderate to severe toxicity (77·4%, 95% CI 73·0–81·5 vs 81·7%, 77·5–85·3; p=0·1586) and late moderate to severe toxicity (16·5%, 95% CI 12·9–20·7 vs 20·4%, 16·4–24·8; p=0·1904) were similar between the cetuximab and cisplatin groups. Interpretation For patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival and progression-free survival compared with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin is the standard of care for eligible patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Funding National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly, and The Oral Cancer Foundation.

HPV-positive oropharynx cancer is frequently characterized as a disease of never-smokers due to higher HPV prevalence in oropharynx tumors among never-smokers than ever-smokers. We sought to estimate the burden (incidence rates and case counts) of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers among never, former, and current smokers in the US population by combining data from several sources.We decomposed the SEER population-level incidence of oropharynx cancers into rates among never-, former-, and current-smokers using a formula based upon rate ratios (RR) for the smoking-oropharynx cancer association (NIH-AARP cohort study) and smoking prevalence in the U.S. population (NHANES 2007/2008). These rates were multiplied by smoking strata-specific HPV prevalence in oropharynx cancer patients (RTOG0129) to estimate incidence of HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharynx cancers, which were applied to the US population of smokers to calculate annual case counts. Analyses were conducted overall and gender-stratified.The incidence of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers was significantly higher among ever versus never-smokers in the US population aged 20+ years during 2007/2008 (RR=1.81; 95%CI=1.32-2.47), including significantly higher incidence in current smokers (RR=2.26; 95%CI=1.60-3.21) and former smokers (RR=1.38; 95%CI=1.02-1.85). Of the estimated 6677 (5418 in men and 1259 in women) annually incident HPV-positive oropharynx cancers in the U.S during 2007/2008, 63.3% arose among ever smokers and 36.7% among never-smokers (p0.001). In both men and women, incidence rates and annual cases of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers were higher in ever smokers versus never smokers.The population-level burden of HPV-positive oropharynx cancers is significantly higher among ever-smokers than never-smokers in the U.S.

Introduction Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E6 serum antibodies are common in people with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers (HPV-OPC), but not the general population. We explored HPV16 seroprevalence in people with and without oral HPV16 infection, the cause of HPV-OPC. Methods Oral rinse samples were collected semiannually and tested for 36 types of HPV DNA by PCR. HPV16 E6 serum antibodies were tested at the visit of first oral HPV detection in participants with prevalent (n = 54), or incident (n = 39) oral HPV16 DNA; or at baseline in matched participants with no oral HPV16 DNA (n = 155) using multiplex serology assay. Predictors of seropositivity were examined using logistic regression. Results HPV16 E6 seropositivity (7.5% vs 0.7%; p = 0.005) but not seropositivity to the other HPV16 antigens, was significantly more common in those with than without oral HPV16 infection. There were only 8 HPV16 E6 seropositive participants, but oral HPV16 DNA remained a strong predictor of E6 seropositivity after adjustment for other risk factors (aOR = 14.6 95%CI, 1.7–122.5). Seroprevalence was similar in those with prevalent (7.4%; 4/54), and incident (7.7%; 3/39) oral HPV16 infection (p = 1.00). E6 seroprevalence was associated with reduced oral HPV16 clearance, but was not statistically significant (HR = 0.65 95% CI, 0.16–2.70). Seropositive participants were primarily male (87.5%), HIV-positive (75.0%; median CD4 cell-count of 840) and had oral HPV16 DNA (87.5%). History of an HPV-related cancer (0/8) or HPV-related anogenital dysplasia (1/8) was rare, and 4 participants had recent screening showing no anogenital dysplasia. Discussion HPV16 E6 seropositivity was higher among people with than without oral HPV16 infection, despite no known anogenital disease in these participants.

Human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus (KSHV) may promote oral cancers, especially among immunosuppressed individuals. The aims of this study were to examine whether demographic characteristics, medical history, sexual behaviors, substance use, CD4+ T-cell count, HIV viral load, and HPV vaccination were associated with HPV, EBV, and KSHV infection and viral load. Multivariable modeling using logistic or linear regression examined associations between independent variables and infection or viral load, respectively. Among 272 HIV-infected 12-24-year-old youth, 19.5% were positive for oral HPV, 88.2% for EBV, and 11.8% for KSHV. In multivariable models, recent marijuana use (OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.02-3.82) and lower CD4+ T-cell count ( 400 vs.

Oral human papillomavirus genotype 16 (HPV16) infection causes oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and the prevalence of oropharyngeal SCC is higher among men than women in the United States. In a cohort study of oral HPV infection among 409 individuals aged 18–25 years, the risk among men but not among women significantly increased as the number of recent (ie, within the prior 3 months) oral sex partners increased (Pinteraction = .05). In contrast, the risk among women but not among men significantly decreased as the lifetime number of vaginal sex partners increased (Pinteraction = .037). Men were also significantly less likely than women to clear oral HPV infection. Our data contribute to understanding sex differences in risk for HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00994019.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the cause of a distinct subset of oropharyngeal cancer rising in incidence in the United States and other developed countries. This increased incidence, combined with the strong effect of tumor HPV status on survival, has had a profound effect on the head and neck cancer discipline. The multidisciplinary field of head and neck cancer is in the midst of re-evaluating evidence-based algorithms for clinical decision making, developed from clinical trials conducted in an era when HPV-negative cancer predominated. This article reviews relationships between tumor HPV status and gender, cancer incidence trends, overall survival, treatment response, racial disparities, tumor staging, risk stratification, survival post disease progression, and clinical trial design.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is now established as the principal cause of an increase in incidence of a subset of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNCs) in numerous geographic regions around the world. Further study of the epidemiology of HPV-positive HNC will be critical to the development and implementation of public health interventions to reverse these global incidence trends. Here, recent data are reviewed to provide insight into several topics, including incidence trends and projections for HPV-positive HNC; the worldwide HPV-attributable fraction; sex disparities in cancer risk; the epidemiology of oral HPV infection; the latency period between infection and cancer; the potential impact of prophylactic HPV vaccination; and prospects for secondary prevention through screening for oral HPV infection or seroreactivity to viral antigens. The identification of a single necessary cause for any cancer provides a rare and perhaps extraordinary opportunity for cancer prevention.

Background: Patients with HPV-related oropharynx cancer have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab can preserve high survival and reduce toxicity is unknown. We performed a randomized trial comparing survival and toxicity in 987 patients enrolled at 182 health care centers in the US and Canada between July 2011 and July 2014. Methods: Eligibility included histologically confirmed HPV positive carcinoma, clinical stage TI-T2, N2-N3 or T3-T4, N0-N3. Zubrod status 0 or 1. All patients received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered in 35 fractions to 70 gray over 6 weeks using 6 fractions per week. High-dose cisplatin at 100 mg/m² was given every 3 weeks for 2 cycles in arm A (standard of care) versus arm B loading dose cetuximab plus weekly cetuximab. Patients were stratified by T category, N category, Zubord performance status, and smoking history. Primary analysis was based on modified intention to treat for all patients meeting eligibility criteria. 849 patients were randomly assigned to radiation plus cetuximab (425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (424). Median follow-up is 4.5 years. Results: Radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 78% in the cetuximab group versus 85% in the cisplatin group (p=0.016). Progression-free survival was 67% versus 78% (p=0.0002). Local-regional failure was higher in the cetuximab group, 17% versus 10% (p=0.005). High-grade acute toxicity was similar at 77% for both groups. Late toxicity was also similar. Conclusions: For HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control compared with radiation plus cisplatin. This study defines radiation using IMRT plus cisplatin as the standard of care for this population. *Lancet. Vol 393, p 40-50, January 5, 2019 Citation Format: J.A. Ridge, J. Ringash, M. Yao, D.M. Blakaj, M.A. Razaq, A.D. Colevas, J.J. Beitler, C.U. Jones, N.E. Dunlap, S.A. Seaward, S. Spencer, T.J. Galloway, J.J. Dignam, Q.T. Le, M.L. Gillison, E.M. Sturgis, J. Phan, A.M. Trotti, J. Harris, A. Eisbruch, P.M. Harari, D.J. Adelstein, S.A. Koyfman, B. Burtness. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papilloma-virus positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG 1016): A randomized multicenter noninferiority trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Optimizing Survival and Quality of Life through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2019 Apr 29-30; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_2):Abstract nr IA20.

3107 Background: Tumor-specific neoantigens provide personalized targets for immunotherapy. Vaccines against epitopes predicted by in silico approaches very rarely induce CD4+ and CD8+ ex vivo T cell responses regardless of formulation. ATLAS selects neoantigens for vaccine inclusion using ex vivo screening of all patient-specific mutations to identify pre-existing CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses and to exclude Inhibigens, which are inhibitory peptides that suppress immunity and accelerate tumor progression. The Inhibigen burden correlates with patient outcomes in observational studies and rapid tumor progression in mouse models. Methods: GEN-009-101 is a phase 1/2a study testing safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity in immune responsive tumors. After next-generation tumor sequencing and ATLAS testing of autologous leukocytes, up to 20 stimulatory synthetic long peptides adjuvanted with poly-ICLC comprise each personalized vaccine. Eight vaccinated patients have been followed for sustained immunological responses and clinical outcomes. Results: The 40 doses given across patients have induced only mild local discomfort and no DLT. Vaccination has generated immune responses against 99% of administered peptides, with both CD8+ and CD4+ responses in ex vivo fluorospot assays. To date, no patients have developed recurrent disease. Broad immunity develops as early as Day 29 and is sustained for over 12 months. Immune response against individual peptides is correlated with peptide concentration (OR = 1.26, p≤0.0001) but not with other classifiers such as GRAVY index (Grand Average of Hydropathy), tumor type, injection site or sex. The Inhibigen burden prior to treatment again correlates with disease progression. Conclusions: GEN-009 identifies tumor specific immune targets from the individual patient’s tumor mutagens. Initial clinical data show that ATLAS antigen selection may be critical to the induction of broad, rapid and sustained immunity against tumor specific neoantigens. Clinical vaccination with PD-1 blockade is in process. Clinical trial information: NCT03633110 . [Table: see text]

6563 Background: To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of 12-14 week post-treatment PET/CT for 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 2-year locoregional control (LRC) in NRG-HN002, which is a two-arm phase II trial for patients with low-risk, non-smoking associated p16-positive LA-OPC randomized in a 1:1 ratio to reduced-dose IMRT with or without cisplatin. Methods: PET/CT scans were reviewed both centrally and locally by participating institutions. Tumor response evaluations for primary site, right neck, and left neck were carried out using a 5-point ordinal scale (‘Hopkins Criteria’). Overall scores were then assigned as ‘Negative,’ Positive,’ or ‘Indeterminate.’ Patients who had a ‘Negative’ score for all three evaluation sites were given an overall score of ‘Negative.’ The endpoints were NPV for LRC and PFS at 2 years testing NPV ≤ 90% vs > 90% (1-sided alpha 0.10 and 76% power). Results: There were 316 patients enrolled, of whom 306 were randomized and eligible. Of these, 131 (42.8%) patients consented to a post-therapy PET/CT, and 117 (89.3%) patients were eligible for PET/CT analysis. The median time from end of treatment to PET/CT scan was 94 days (range 52-139). The rates of 2-yr PFS and LRC in the analysis subgroup were 91.3% and 93.8%, respectively. Based on central review, post-treatment scans were negative for residual tumor for 115 patients (98.3%) and positive for 2 patients (1.7%). The NPV for 2-year LRC was 94.5% (90% lower confidence bound [LCB] 90.6%; p = 0.07). NPV for 2-year PFS was 92.0% (90% LCB 87.7%; p = 0.30). Similar NPV results were obtained based on analysis of local reviews. Conclusion: Within the context of deintensification with reduced-dose radiation, the NPV of a 12-14 week post-therapy PET/CT for 2-year LRC is statistically > 90%, similar to that reported for patients receiving standard chemoradiation. However, in this study, there was not enough evidence to conclude that the NPV of a 12-14 week post-therapy PET/CT for 2-year PFS is > 90%. Grant acknowledgement: This project was supported by grants U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), U24CA180803 (IROC), UG1CA189867 (NRG Oncology NCORP) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). This project is funded, in part, under a Grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health. The Department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations or conclusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02254278 .

6500 Background: ECOG-ACRIN 3311 examines reduced postoperative therapy in patients with “intermediate risk” p16+ oropharynx cancer (OPC) undergoing primary transoral surgical management. We report the primary endpoint of 2-year progression free survival (PFS) for patients randomized to 50Gy vs 60Gy without chemotherapy. Methods: Between December 2013 and July 2017, 82 credentialed surgeons performed transoral resection (TOS) for 519 OPC patients (cT1-2 stage III/IV AJCC7 without matted neck nodes); post-operative management was determined by pathologically assessed risk. Among 353 eligible and treated patients, Arm A enrolled 10% (N=37) for clear margins, 0-1 nodes, no extranodal extension (ENE)), Arms B (50Gy, N=102) or C (60Gy, N=104) randomized 58%, for clear/close margins, 2-4 + nodes, or ENE ≤1mm, while Arm D (N=110, 60-66Gy plus weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, positive margin with any T stage, >4 + nodes, or >1mm ENE) enrolled 31%. Arm D assignment was based on >1mm ENE (76%), > 4 nodes (27%), and/or positive margins (11%). Intermediate-risk patients were stratified by smoking history (>10 pk-yr). Of the 80 pts (15%) deemed ineligible, 28 had scans/labs not done per protocol, however treatment arm distribution for all patients mirrored that for the 353 pts eligible and treated. Results: Median follow-up was 31.8 months. 2 yr PFS for Arms A, B and C were 93.9% (90% CI=87.3%, 100%), 95.0% (90% CI=91.4%, 98.6%) and 95.9% (90% CI=92.6%, 99.3%) respectively, while Arm D was 90.5% (90% CI=85.9%, 95.3%). The regimen of TOS + low-dose radiation is considered worthy of further study, since the primary endpoint of the upper bound of the 90% CI (in the intermediate risk group) exceeding 85% was met. Of 17 progression events, 7 were locoregional. There were 10 distant recurrences: Arm A=1, Arm B=2, Arm C=4, Arm D=3. Grade III/IV treatment-related AE rates were 15%/2% during surgery, 13%/2% for Arm B and 25%/0% for Arm C. There were 2 treatment-related deaths (one surgical and one Arm D). Conclusions: Transoral resection of p16+ OPC is safe and results in good oncologic outcome, presenting a promising deintensification approach. For patients with low-risk disease, 2-yr PFS is favorable without post-operative therapy. For those with uninvolved surgical margins

Background Tumor-specific neoantigens provide personalized targets for immunotherapy. Vaccines against epitopes predicted by in silico approaches very rarely induce CD4+ and CD8+ ex vivo T cell responses regardless of formulation. ATLAS selects neoantigens for vaccine inclusion using ex vivo screening of all patient-specific mutations to identify pre-existing CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses and to exclude inhibitory peptides that suppress immunity and accelerate tumor progression. Preliminary data suggest that the inhibitory peptide profile may predict tumor response to immunotherapy. Methods GEN-009-101 is a phase I/IIa study testing safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity in immune responsive tumors. After next-generation tumor sequencing and ATLAS testing of autologous leukocytes, up to 20 stimulatory synthetic long peptides adjuvanted with poly-ICLC make each personalized vaccine. The immunogenicity pilot has enrolled 9 patients in remission to receive GEN-009 monotherapy. Results 4 patients have participated to the primary immunogenicity readout at day 50 (some data pending). The 17 doses given across patients have induced only mild local discomfort and no DLT. ATLAS results show high interpatient variability. Vaccination has generated immune responses against 94% of administered peptides, and both CD8+ and CD4+ responses in a 44hr ex vivo fluorospot assay. Ten-day in vitro stimulation (IVS) assays result in broader immune responses.Table1178PDTablePTTumor TypeSomatic Mutations/MbATLAS NeoantigensPost-vaccination Response*StimulatoryInhibitoryex vivo CD4/CD8IVS CD4/CD8Total Positive1NSCLC1.256010% / 40%100% / 20%100%2Bladder3.1516450% / 38%63% / 50%88%3Melanoma28.69199416% / 38%75% / TBDTBD4Bladder3.53181TBDTBDTBD5NSCLC3.5616955% / 45%TBDTBD*number of positive peptides/total peptides immunized Conclusions GEN-009 is a neoantigen vaccine that identifies tumor specific immune targets from the individual patient's repertoire. Immunogenicity data show that ATLAS can, with very high frequency, identify relevant neoantigens and exclude suppressive peptides. Clinical vaccination with PD-1 blockade is in process. Clinical trial identification NCT03633110, issued 6-Aug-2018. Legal entity responsible for the study Genocea Biosciences. Funding Genocea Biosciences. Disclosure P. Twardowski: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bayer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. M.L. Johnson: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Genentech / Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Mirati; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): LOXO; Advisory / Consultancy: Calithera; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Araxes Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Mersana Therapeutics ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BeiGene; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Guardant Health; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Ribon Therapeutics ; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AbbVie; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Spouse / Financial dependant: Clovis; Spouse / Financial dependant: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genmab; Research grant / Funding (institution): Stemcentrix; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Checkpoint Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Array Biopharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Regeneron; Research grant / Funding (institution): Apexigen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tarveda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Adaptimmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Syndax; Research grant / Funding (institution): Neovia; Research grant / Funding (institution): Hengrui Therapeutics, INC; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Daiichi - Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lycera; Research grant / Funding (institution): G1 Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Dynavax; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cytomx; Research grant / Funding (institution): Birdie; Research grant / Funding (institution): Corvus; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Research grant / Funding (institution): Gritstone; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Kadmon; Research grant / Funding (institution): Acerta; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Shattuck Labs; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Exelixis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sysmex Inostics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Vapotherm. M. Stein: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncoceutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Medivation/Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Advaxis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Suzhou Kintor Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Harpoon; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Nektar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Xencor. M.L. Gillison: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Aspyrian; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Britsol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: GlaxoSmithKline; Advisory / Consultancy: Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: NewLink; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Ventana; Advisory / Consultancy: Biomimetix. L. McNeil: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. L. Dowal: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. D. DeOliveira: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. M. Jain: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. J. Price: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. R. Hernandez: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genocea. A. DeCillis: Advisory / Consultancy: Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pyramid; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo. N. Singh: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. T. Davis: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. J. Flechtner: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Genocea. R.B. Cohen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Genocea; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Innate Biopharma; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): HEAT Biologics; Advisory / Consultancy: Cantargia; Advisory / Consultancy: Tmunity; Research grant / Funding (institution): Arrys; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celldex. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary but insufficient cause of a subset of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) that is increasing markedly in frequency. To identify contributory, secondary genetic alterations in these cancers, we used comprehensive genomics methods to compare 149 HPV-positive and 335 HPV-negative OSCC tumor/normal pairs. Different behavioral risk factors underlying the two OSCC types were reflected in distinctive genomic mutational signatures. In HPV-positive OSCCs, the signatures of APOBEC cytosine deaminase editing, associated with anti-viral immunity, were strongly linked to overall mutational burden. In contrast, in HPV-negative OSCCs, T>C substitutions in the sequence context 5′-ATN-3′ correlated with tobacco exposure. Universal expression of HPV E6*1 and E7 oncogenes was a sine qua non of HPV-positive OSCCs. Significant enrichment of somatic mutations was confirmed or newly identified in PIK3CA, KMT2D, FGFR3, FBXW7, DDX3X, PTEN, TRAF3, RB1, CYLD, RIPK4, ZNF750, EP300, CASZ1, TAF5, RBL1, IFNGR1, and NFKBIA. Of these, many affect host pathways already targeted by HPV oncoproteins, including the p53 and pRB pathways, or disrupt host defenses against viral infections, including interferon (IFN) and nuclear factor kappa B signaling. Frequent copy number changes were associated with concordant changes in gene expression. Chr 11q (including CCND1) and 14q (including DICER1 and AKT1) were recurrently lost in HPV-positive OSCCs, in contrast to their gains in HPV-negative OSCCs. High-ranking variant allele fractions implicated ZNF750, PIK3CA, and EP300 mutations as candidate driver events in HPV-positive cancers. We conclude that virus-host interactions cooperatively shape the unique genetic features of these cancers, distinguishing them from their HPV-negative counterparts.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck (H&N) Cancers provide treatment recommendations for cancers of the lip, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, ethmoid and maxillary sinuses, and salivary glands. Recommendations are also provided for occult primary of the H&N, and separate algorithms have been developed by the panel for very advanced H&N cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussion and most recent recommendations regarding evaluation and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: We report 2-year results from CheckMate 141 to establish the long-term efficacy and safety profile of nivolumab and outcomes by tumor PD-L1 expression in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M),platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Patients with R/M SCCHN with tumor progression/recurrence within 6 months of platinum therapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator’s choice (IC). Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS). Data cutoff: September 2017. RESULTS: With 24.2 months’ minimum follow-up, nivolumab (n =240) continued to improve OS vs IC (n = 121), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.54–0.86). Nivolumab nearly tripled the estimated 24-month OS rate (16.9%) vs IC (6.0%), and demonstrated OS benefit across patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% (HR [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39–0.78]) and < 1% (HR [95% CI] =0.73 [0.49–1.09]), and regardless of tumor HPV status. Estimated OS rates at 18, 24, and 30 months with nivolumab were consistent irrespective of PD-L1 expression (< 1%/≥1%). In the nivolumab arm, there were no observed differences in baseline characteristics or safety profile between long-term survivors and the overall population. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 15.3% and 36.9% for nivolumab and IC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab significantly improved OS at the primary analysis and demonstrated prolonged OS benefit vs IC and maintenance of a manageable and consistent safety profile with 2-year follow-up. OS benefit was observed with nivolumab irrespective of PD-L1 expression and HPV status. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02105636)

There have been few published studies on differences between Blacks and Whites in the estimated effects of alcohol and tobacco use on the incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) in the United States. Previous studies have been limited by small numbers of Blacks. Using pooled data from 13 US case–control studies of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium, this study comprised a large number of Black HNC cases (n = 975). Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for several tobacco and alcohol consumption characteristics. Blacks were found to have consistently stronger associations than Whites for the majority of tobacco consumption variables. For example, compared to never smokers, Blacks who smoked cigarettes for > 30 years had an OR 4.53 (95% CI 3.22–6.39), which was larger than that observed in Whites (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.73–3.33; pinteraction < 0.0001). The ORs for alcohol use were also larger among Blacks compared to Whites. Exclusion of oropharyngeal cases attenuated the racial differences in tobacco use associations but not alcohol use associations. These findings suggest modest racial differences exist in the association of HNC risk with tobacco and alcohol consumption. © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.

Oral squamous cell carcinomas are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and tobacco usage, alcohol consumption, and poor oral hygiene are established risk factors. To date, no large-scale case-control studies have considered the effects of these risk factors on the composition of the oral microbiome, nor microbial community associations with oral cancer. We compared the composition, diversity, and function of the oral microbiomes of 121 oral cancer patients to 242 age- and gender-matched controls using a metagenomic multivariate analysis pipeline. Significant shifts in composition and function of the oral microbiome were observed with poor oral hygiene, tobacco smoking, and oral cancer. Specifically, we observed dramatically altered community composition and function after tooth loss, with smaller alterations in current tobacco smokers, increased production of antioxidants in individuals with periodontitis, and significantly decreased glutamate metabolism metal transport in oral cancer patients. Although the alterations in the oral microbiome of oral cancer patients were significant, they were of substantially lower effect size relative to microbiome shifts after tooth loss. Alterations following tooth loss, itself a major risk factor for oral cancer, are likely a result of severe ecological disruption due to habitat loss but may also contribute to the development of the disease.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the 2015 NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck (HN the small number of patients in the United States who currently receive this treatment; and concerns that the toxicity of neutron therapy may offset potential disease control advantages.

The association between oral human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) DNA load and infection clearance was evaluated among 88 individuals with oral HPV16 infection who were identified within a prospective cohort of 1470 HIV-infected and uninfected individuals. Oral rinse specimens were collected semiannually for up to 5 years. The oral HPV16 load at the time of the first positive test result was significantly associated with the time to clearance of infection (continuous P trends

BACKGROUND Little is known about the epidemiology or risk factors for oral human papillomavirus (HPV) in HIV-infected youth. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and correlates of oral HPV infection and to explore the association between HPV vaccination and oral infection in HIV-infected youth. METHODS Youth 12 to 24 years of age with behaviorally acquired HIV were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Procedures involved medical chart review, survey, and collection of an oral rinse sample. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine whether demographic, behavioral, immunologic, and virologic factors and history of vaccination were significantly associated with oral HPV infection. RESULTS Mean age of the 272 participants was 21.5 years; 64% were non-Hispanic black and 20.2% were Hispanic; and 10.8% of men compared with 20.3% of women were fully vaccinated. Human papillomavirus prevalence was 19.7% in men and 18.6% in women (P = 1.0). Only men were positive for vaccine-type HPV: 5.6% were positive for HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and/or HPV-18, and 4.2% were positive for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18. Among men who were fully vaccinated, none were positive for HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and/or HPV-18, compared with 12 (6.3%) of men who were not fully vaccinated (P = 0.37). Two variables were marginally associated with oral HPV (P < 0.10): marijuana use in the previous 3 months and lower CD4+ T-cell count. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence rates of oral HPV were relatively high in this population of HIV-infected youth and were similar in male and female youth. No fully vaccinated men were infected with vaccine-type HPV.

The International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium is a collaboration of research groups leading large epidemiology studies to improve the understanding of the causes and mechanisms of head and neck cancer. The consortium includes investigators of 35 studies who have pooled their data on 25 500 patients with head and neck cancer (i.e., cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx) and 37 100 controls. The INHANCE analyses have confirmed that tobacco use and alcohol intake are key risk factors of these diseases and have provided precise estimates of risk and dose response, the benefit of quitting, and the hazard of smoking even a few cigarettes per day. Other risk factors include short height, lean body mass, low education and income, and a family history of head and neck cancer. Risk factors are generally similar for oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, although the magnitude of risk may vary. Some major strengths of pooling data across studies include more precise estimates of risk and the ability to control for potentially confounding factors and to examine factors that may interact with each other. The INHANCE consortium provides evidence of the scientific productivity and discoveries that can be obtained from data pooling projects. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes the majority of oropharyngeal cancers in the United States, yet the risk factors for and natural history of oral HPV infection are largely unknown. In 2010-2011, a US-based longitudinal cohort study of 761 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and 469 at-risk HIV-uninfected participants from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Women's Interagency HIV Study was initiated. Semiannually collected oral rinses were evaluated for 37 HPV genotypes using the Roche LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, California), and factors associated with oral HPV incidence and clearance were explored using adjusted Wei-Lin-Weissfeld modeling. Through 2013, the 2-year cumulative incidence of any type of oral HPV infection was 34% in HIV-infected persons and 19% in HIV-uninfected persons. However, many of these infections cleared. Seven percent of incident infections and 35% of prevalent infections persisted for at least 2 years. After adjustment for other risk factors, HIV infection (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.7, 3.2), reduced current CD4 cell count, and increased numbers of oral sex and "rimming" partners increased the risk of incident oral HPV infection, whereas male sex, older age, and current smoking increased the risk of oral HPV persistence (each P < 0.05). This helps explain the consistent associations observed between these factors and prevalent oral HPV infection in previous cross-sectional studies.

Purpose We tested the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus accelerated fractionation with a concomitant boost (AFX-C) versus standard fractionation (SFX) in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LA-HNC). Patients and Methods Patients had stage III to IV carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Radiation therapy schedules were 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (SFX) or 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks (AFX-C). Cisplatin doses were 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for two (AFX-C) or three (SFX) cycles. Toxicities were scored by using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the one-sided log-rank test. Locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated by using the cumulative incidence method and Gray's test. Results In all, 721 of 743 patients were analyzable (361, SFX; 360, AFX-C). At a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 0.3 to 10.1 years) for 355 surviving patients, no differences were observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18; P = .37; 8-year survival, 48% v 48%), PFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.24; P = .52; 8-year estimate, 42% v 41%), LRF (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38; P = .78; 8-year estimate, 37% v 39%), or DM (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.24; P = .16; 8-year estimate, 15% v 13%). For oropharyngeal cancer, p16-positive patients had better OS than p16-negative patients (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.42; P < .001; 8-year survival, 70.9% v 30.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the grade 3 to 5 acute or late toxicities between the two arms and p-16 status. Conclusion When combined with cisplatin, AFX-C neither improved outcome nor increased late toxicity in patients with LA-HNC. Long-term high survival rates in p16-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer support the ongoing efforts to explore deintensification.

Copyright © 2014 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. All rights reserved. This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Head and Neck Cancers focuses on glottic laryngeal cancer, which is the most common type of laryngeal cancer and has an excellent cure rate. The lymphatic drainage of the glottis is sparse, and early stage primaries rarely spread to regional nodes. Because hoarseness is an early symptom, most glottic laryngeal cancer is early stage at diagnosis. Updates to these guidelines for 2014 include revisions to "Principles of Radiation Therapy" for each site and "Principles of Surgery," and the addition of a new section on "Principles of Dental Evaluation and Management."

Current radiation therapy (RT) treatment schedules for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are derived from a combination of rigorous radiobiology and data from prospective clinical trials. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is now appreciated to be biologically distinct from the traditional type of HNSCC resulting from tobacco and alcohol use. Remarkably high 5-year survival rates, not previously observed in the head and neck cancer patient population, are observed among patients with HPV-positive OPSCC when treated with platinum-based chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Additionally, the patient population afflicted with HPV-positive OPSCC is younger, healthier, and far more likely to be alive to deal with the long-term consequences of therapy. Clinicians who treat HPV-positive OPSCC are now faced with the problem that current treatment paradigms were developed in an era when the traditional HNSCC patient (tobaccoand alcohol-related) predominated. This has led to an appropriate re-examination of treatment paradigms as applied to the HPV-positive OPSCC patient, as well as a new appreciation for the problem of chronic toxicity. We note that it is provocative (and frightening) to “mess with success.” For this reason, the proposition of dose deescalation (of chemotherapy and/or RT) or substitution with

Purpose Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is evolving toward risk-based modification of therapeutic intensity, which requires patient-specific estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods To develop and validate nomograms for OS and PFS, we used a derivation cohort of 493 patients with OPSCC with known p16 tumor status (surrogate of human papillomavirus) and cigarette smoking history (pack-years) randomly assigned to clinical trials using platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 0129 and 0522). Nomograms were created from Cox models and internally validated by use of bootstrap and cross-validation. Model discrimination was measured by calibration plots and the concordance index. Nomograms were externally validated in a cohort of 153 patients with OPSCC randomly assigned to a third trial, NRG Oncology RTOG 9003. Results Both models included age, Zubrod performance status, pack-years, education, p16 status, and T and N stage; the OS model also included anemia and age × pack-years interaction; and the PFS model also included marital status, weight loss, and p16 × Zubrod interaction. Predictions correlated well with observed 2-year and 5-year outcomes. The uncorrected concordance index was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.80) for OS and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.74) for PFS, and bias-corrected indices were similar. In the validation set, OS and PFS models were well calibrated, and OS and PFS were significantly different across tertiles of nomogram scores (log-rank P = .003;< .001). Conclusion The validated nomograms provided useful prediction of OS and PFS for patients with OPSCC treated with primary radiation-based therapy.

Objectives To assess efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus investigator’s choice of therapy (IC) in Asian patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Materials and methods Thirty-four patients from Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Korea received nivolumab 3 mg/kg ( n = 23) every 2 weeks or IC ( n = 11), as part of a global trial ( n = 361), until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results Median OS was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1–NR) with nivolumab and 6.2 months (95% CI 2.6–NR) with IC. Seven (30.4%) patients receiving nivolumab and six (54.5%) receiving IC died. The hazard ratio (HR) for risk of death (nivolumab vs. IC) was 0.50 (95% CI 0.17–1.48). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6–7.5) with nivolumab and 1.8 months (95% CI 0.4–6.1) with IC (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.25–1.33]). Objective response rates (complete + partial responses) were 26.1% (6/23 patients; 95% CI 10.2–48.4) for nivolumab and 0% (0/11 patients; 95% CI 0.0–28.5) for IC. Sixteen (69.6%) nivolumab-treated patients and 10 (90.9%) patients receiving IC had a treatment-related adverse event, most commonly decreased appetite (21.7%), pruritus, rash, and fatigue (17.4% each) with nivolumab, and nausea, stomatitis, and decreased appetite (27.3% each) with IC. Conclusion Nivolumab demonstrated a survival advantage compared with conventional treatments in Asian patients with platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, and was well tolerated. Clinical trial registration NCT02105636.

Using conditional cell reprogramming, we generated a stable cell culture of an extremely rare and aggressive neuroendocrine cervical cancer. The cultured cells contained HPV-16, formed colonies in soft agar and rapidly produced tumors in immunodeficient mice. The HPV-16 genome was integrated adjacent to the Myc gene, both of which were amplified 40-fold. Analysis of RNA transcripts detected fusion of the HPV/Myc genes, arising from apparent microhomologous recombination. Spectral karyotyping (SKY) and fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated coordinate localization and translocation of the amplified Myc and HPV genes on chromosomes 8 and 21. Similar to the primary tumor, tumor cell cultures expressed very high levels of the Myc protein and, in contrast to all other HPV-positive cervical cancer cell lines, they harbored a gain-of-function mutation in p53 (R273C). Unexpectedly, viral oncogene knockdown had no effect on the growth of the cells, but it did inhibit the proliferation of a conventional HPV-16 positive cervical cancer cell line. Knockdown of Myc, but not the mutant p53, significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation. On the basis of these data, we propose that the primary driver of transformation in this aggressive cervical cancer is not HPV oncogene expression but rather the overexpression of Myc.

Purpose Combining cisplatin or cetuximab with radiation improves overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma (HNC). Cetuximab plus platinum regimens also increase OS in metastatic HNC. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group launched a phase III trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to the radiation-cisplatin platform improves progression-free survival (PFS). Patients and Methods Eligible patients with stage III or IV HNC were randomly assigned to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Acute and late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features and markers. Results Of 891 analyzed patients, 630 were alive at analysis (median follow-up, 3.8 years). Cetuximab plus cisplatin-radiation, versus cisplatin-radiation alone, resulted in more frequent interruptions in radiation therapy (26.9% v 15.1%, respectively); similar cisplatin delivery (mean, 185.7 mg/m2 v 191.1 mg/m2, respectively); and more grade 3 to 4 radiation mucositis (43.2% v 33.3%, respectively), rash, fatigue, anorexia, and hypokalemia, but not more late toxicity. No differences were found between arms A and B in 30-day mortality (1.8% v 2.0%, respectively; P = .81), 3-year PFS (61.2% v 58.9%, respectively; P = .76), 3-year OS (72.9% v 75.8%, respectively; P = .32), locoregional failure (19.9% v 25.9%, respectively; P = .97), or distant metastasis (13.0% v 9.7%, respectively; P = .08). Patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), compared with patients with p16-negative OPC, had better 3-year probability of PFS (72.8% v 49.2%, respectively; P < .001) and OS (85.6% v 60.1%, respectively; P < .001), but tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression did not distinguish outcome. Conclusion Adding cetuximab to radiation-cisplatin did not improve outcome and hence should not be prescribed routinely. PFS and OS were higher in patients with p16-positive OPC, but outcomes did not differ by EGFR expression.

Low socioeconomic status has been reported to be associated with head and neck cancer risk. However, previous studies have been too small to examine the associations by cancer subsite, age, sex, global region and calendar time and to explain the association in terms of behavioral risk factors. Individual participant data of 23,964 cases with head and neck cancer and 31,954 controls from 31 studies in 27 countries pooled with random effects models. Overall, low education was associated with an increased risk of head and neck cancer (OR = 2.50; 95% CI = 2.02 – 3.09). Overall one-third of the increased risk was not explained by differences in the distribution of cigarette smoking and alcohol behaviors; and it remained elevated among never users of tobacco and nondrinkers (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.13 – 2.31). More of the estimated education effect was not explained by cigarette smoking and alcohol behaviors: in women than in men, in older than younger groups, in the oropharynx than in other sites, in South/Central America than in Europe/North America and was strongest in countries with greater income inequality. Similar findings were observed for the estimated effect of low versus high household income. The lowest levels of income and educational attainment were associated with more than 2-fold increased risk of head and neck cancer, which is not entirely explained by differences in the distributions of behavioral risk factors for these cancers and which varies across cancer sites, sexes, countries and country income inequality levels.

Summary Background Although human papillomavirus detection in cervical lymph nodes of head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) of unknown primary site (UP) is indicative of a primary tumor of the oropharynx (OP), localization can remain elusive. Therefore, we investigated ultrasonography (US) for the identification of the primary tumor. Methods Eligible cases had HNSCC of UP after evaluation by a head and neck surgical oncologist. Controls were healthy volunteers. Transcervical and intraoral ultrasonography was performed by a standard protocol using convex (3.75–6.0 MHz and 5–7.5 MHz) transducers. US findings were compared with operative examination (exam under anesthesia, direct laryngoscopy) and biopsies. The primary outcome of interest was the presence or absence of a lesion on US. Results 10 cases and 20 controls were enrolled. PET/CT scans were negative/nonspecific (9), or suspicious (1) for a primary lesion. On US, predominantly hypoechoic (9 of 10) lesions were visualized consistent with base of tongue ( n = 7) or tonsil ( n = 3) primary tumors. On operative examination, 5 of 10 were appreciated. Two additional primaries were confirmed with biopsies “directed” by preoperative US. This represents an overall diagnostic rate of 70%, which is 20% higher than our detection rate for 2008–2010. The three cases in which a suspicious lesion was visualized on US, yet remained UP despite further interventions, could represent false positives, misclassification or operator variability. No lesions were suspected among the controls. Conclusion Ultrasound has promise for detection of UPs of the OP and therefore warrants further investigation.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, and patient outcomes using current treatments remain poor. Tumor development is etiologically associated with tobacco or alcohol use and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV-positive HNSCCs, which frequently harbor wild-type p53, carry a more favorable prognosis and are a biologically distinct subgroup when compared with their HPV-negative counterparts. HPV E7 induces expression of the human DEK gene, both in vitro and in vivo. In keratinocytes, DEK overexpression is sufficient for causing oncogenic phenotypes in the absence of E7. Conversely, DEK loss results in cell death in HPV-positive cervical cancer cells at least in part through p53 activation, and Dek knockout mice are relatively resistant to the development of chemically induced skin papillomas. Despite the established oncogenic role of DEK in HPV-associated cervical cancer cell lines and keratinocytes, a functional role of DEK has not yet been explored in HNSCC. Using an established transgenic mouse model of HPV16 E7-induced HNSCC, we demonstrate that Dek is required for optimal proliferation of E7-transgenic epidermal cells and for the growth of HNSCC tumors. Importantly, these studies also demonstrate that DEK protein is universally upregulated in both HPV-positive and -negative human HNSCC tumors relative to adjacent normal tissue. Furthermore, DEK knockdown inhibited the proliferation of HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC cells, establishing a functional role for DEK in human disease. Mechanistic studies reveal that attenuated HNSCC cell growth in response to DEK loss was associated with reduced expression of the oncogenic p53 family member, ΔNp63. Exogenous ΔNp63 expression rescued the proliferative defect in the absence of DEK, thereby establishing a functional DEK-ΔNp63 oncogenic pathway that promotes HNSCC. Taken together, our data demonstrate that DEK stimulates HNSCC cellular growth and identify ΔNp63 as a novel DEK effector.

PurposePersistent oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection increases risk for oropharyngeal carcinoma, and people living with HIV have higher rates of oral HPV infection and related cancers. Some prescription medications have immunomodulatory effects, but the impact of medication use on oral HPV natural history is unknown.MethodsScope® oral rinse-and-gargle samples were collected semi-annually from 1,666 participants and tested for 37 types of oral HPV DNA using PCR; 594 HPV-infected participants with 1,358 type-specific oral HPV infections were identified. Data were collected on recent (past 6months) use of medications. The relationship between medication use and oral HPV clearance was evaluated using Wei-Lin-Weissfeld regression, adjusting for biologic sex, prevalent versus incident infection, age, HIV status and CD4+T cell count.ResultsOut of 11 medications examined, oral HPV clearance was significantly reduced in participants reporting recent use of antipsychotics (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.99), anxiolytics/sedatives (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.96) and antidepressants (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-0.999). Among antipsychotics users, effect modification by HIV status was observed, with reduced clearance in HIV-infected (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.91), but not HIV-uninfected participants (p-interaction=0.009). After adjusted analysis, antipsychotic use remained significantly associated with reduced oral HPV clearance overall (aHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.99), and when restricted to only HIV-infected participants (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90). After adjustment, anxiolytic/sedative use and antidepressant use were no longer significantly associated with reduced oral HPV clearance.ConclusionsSome medications were associated with decreased oral HPV clearance, most notably antipsychotic medications. These medications are prescribed for conditions that may have immunomodulating effects, so characteristics of underlying illness may have partially contributed to reduced oral HPV clearance.

Background Oral health and hygiene have been implicated as risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma (i.e. oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers, OSCC), and we recently reported that these risk factors also dramatically alter the oral microbiome. Here we performed a more detailed analysis of associations between oral health behaviors and OSCC in a matched case-control study. We stratified our analysis to compare and contrast associations with Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-positive versus HPV-negative OSCC. Methods Cases were patients with newly diagnosed OSCC at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2011 and 2014. Controls were patients without cancer from the same outpatient clinic who were matched (2:1) to each case on age, sex, and race. Cases were stratified by tumor high-risk HPV status (HPV-positive, n=117; HPV-negative, n=114) based on E6 or E7 mRNA expression. Data on demographics; tobacco, alcohol, and sexual history; and oral health behaviors were collected using an audio computer-assisted self-interview. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and oral health behaviors significant in univariable analysis were evaluated in separate multivariable models. Results In univariable analysis, oral health behaviors such as low frequency of dental clinic visit, tooth brushing, and dental flossing; gum bleeding; tooth loss; and denture use significantly increased risk of HPV-negative OSCC, whereas none of these behaviors increased risk of HPV-positive OSCC. In univariable analysis, covariates associated with increased risk of HPV-negative OSCC were low education and income level, high lifetime tobacco pack-years (0, >0-40) and high lifetime heavy (≥14 drinks/week) drinking years (0, >0-0- Conclusion Poor oral health behaviors such as infrequent dental visits and dental flossing were independently associated with HPV-negative OSCC, but not with HPV-positive OSCC. These findings are consistent with a hypothesis that poor oral health behaviors alter oral microbial composition to promote chronic inflammation and the development of HPV-negative OSCC. Citation Format: Jitesh B. Shewale, Robert Pickard, Maura L. Gillison. Poor oral hygiene is associated with HPV-negative and not HPV-positive oral cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 643.

IMPORTANCE: Detection of persistent oral human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA may be associated with recurrence of HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of oral HPV DNA detection and associations with disease outcomes in patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, 2-institution, tertiary referral center study of 396 patients with newly diagnosed oral cavity or oropharyngeal HNSCC was performed from July 11, 2011, to May 7, 2016. Oral rinse samples were prospectively collected at diagnosis and at completion of primary therapy. Weekly oral rinse samples were collected during radiotherapy. Purified tumor and oral rinse sample DNA were evaluated for 37 HPV types, and viral load was quantified by type-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cancers were stratified by tumor HPV status, and HPV was classified as tumor type if identical to that detected in the tumor or nontumor type. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of HPV DNA before, during, and after therapy. Associations between tumor-type and nontumor-type oral HPV DNA detection and recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 396 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 19-96 years]; 295 [74.5%] men; and 354 [89.4%] white race/ethnicity), 217 had oropharyngeal cancer; 170, oral cavity cancer; and 9, unknown primary HNSCC. The prevalence of oral HPV detection at diagnosis was higher among patients with HPV-positive compared with HPV-negative HNSCC (24 of 194 [84.2%] vs 170 of 202 [12.4%]; P

6073 Background: Nivo, which inhibits the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor, improved survival for pts with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. A clinical trial evaluated the safety of adding nivo to 4 standard intensity modulated (chemo) radiotherapy (RT) regimens (see table) for pts with newly diagnosed IR/HR HNSCC. Primary endpoint was safety and feasibility. Methods: Eligibility included IR (p16+ oropharynx [op], T1-2N2b-N3/T3-4N0-3, >10 pack-years [pys], or T4N0-N3/T1-3N3, ≤10 pys) & HR HNSCC (oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx, p16- op, T1-2N2a-N3/T3-4N0-3). 10 pts/arm (8 evaluable; 0-2/8 DLTs acceptable). Nivo (dose & schedule varied per arm) started 2 wks pre-RT & continued 3 months post-RT. Feasibility of adjuvant nivo months 3-12 post-RT defined as ≥4 of 8 pts/arm received 7 doses. Arm 4 limited to age ≥70, Zubrod performance status (PS) 2, CrCl 10 pys, 62% p16+ op, 72% T3-4, 85% N2-3. Grade ≥3 nivo-related AEs: adrenal insufficiency, diarrhea-3, anemia, fatigue-2, mucositis-3, nausea, vomiting, lipase increase-6, amylase increase-2, lymphocyte/neutrophil/WBC decrease-4, hyponatremia-3, anorexia, maculo-papular rash. SAE in 4/10, 4/9, 5/10 & 4/10. DLTs, adjuvant chemo feasibility, median follow-up (mo), progression or death events per arm shown in table. Conclusions: Nivo concomitant with all (chemo)RT regimens was safe for patients with newly diagnosed IR/HR HNSCC but adjuvant nivo was infeasible after high-dose cisplatin or in cisplatin-ineligible patients ( NCT02764593 ). Preliminary data on progression/death is provided. Acknowledgements: Support for this study was provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Clinical trial information: NCT02764593. [Table: see text]

6008 Background: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 are active in metastatic oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPC). Durvalumab (durva) and tremelimumab (tremi) target respectively PD-L1 and CTLA-4, which in combination may be synergistic. Here we report the safety and interim results of durva vs. durva+tremi prior to surgery in a window of opportunity trial in OPC. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to durva 1500 mg or durva 1500 mg + tremi 75 mg IV Q4W x 2 cycles. The primary objective was to quantify pre- and post-treatment differences in CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for the two arms. Secondary objectives included safety, toxicity, ORR by RECIST, fraction of patients undergoing surgery at 8 wks, and percentage viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen. Serial pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor specimens were collected for ongoing correlative analyses. Results: 28 pts enrolled: median age 64y, 27 (96%) male, 19 (68%) newly diagnosed, most (63%) at stage IVA (AJCC 7th Ed), 9 (32%) had locoregional recurrence, 24 (86%) p16 positive, and 22 (79%) had ≤ 10 PPY smoking history. Median follow-up was 7.6 months. The most common AEs were fatigue (36%), leukopenia/lymphopenia (25%), transaminitis (25%), and rash (21%). Grade 3 AEs occurred in 4 (14%) pts: 2 elevated lipase, 1 diarrhea, and 1 hepatitis, all were manageable. There were no grade >3 AEs. ORR was 43%: 50% had SD (including 29% tumor shrinkage in 1 pt). Treatment effect in the surgical specimen was observed in 19 (79%) of 24 evaluable pts; 2 pts had major pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor) at the primary site. Efficacy was equivalent in both arms. The 2 pts with PD and 1 pt with SD were switched to chemotherapy after durva +/- tremi before resection; interestingly, each achieved a pCR in the primary. Most pts (57%) didn’t receive radiotherapy after surgery. There was a statistically significant association between ORR and treatment effect (p=0.014). The median percentage of viable tumor in the primary was 37.5% in pts with PR, and 82.5% in SD (p=0.003). Conclusions: Durva +/- tremi prior to surgery was well tolerated in OPC pts. Activity is encouraging with treatment effect seen in 79% of pts. The primary endpoint and complete efficacy data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03144778.

Background Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the principal underlying cause of a dramatic increase in oropharyngeal cancer. Dentistry can play an important role in developing clinical algorithms for secondary prevention. Methods The authors conducted this cross-sectional pilot study with practices of The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The authors evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of screening and testing procedures as judged by practitioners and patients. The authors used tablet devices for patient screening, obtaining consent, and administering a confidential oral HPV risk factor survey. Results Most patients (85%) were comfortable being asked about their cigarette use and their sexual behavior (69%) and were interested in participating again (79%). More than 90% of practitioners were comfortable with study procedures except the extra time required for patient participation (75% comfortable). There were no problems with oral rinse collection as reported by patients or practitioners. Conclusions It is feasible in community dental offices to collect oral rinses for HPV detection and to ask patients explicit questions about sexual history when using a tablet device for confidentiality. Practical Implications Discussing high-risk types of HPV and appropriately assessing that risk are a challenge for oral health care professionals. These results are positive from a research perspective but do not address the advisability of routine HPV screening in dentistry.