101. Cost-minimization analysis of teledermatology versus conventional care in the Brazilian National Health System
- Author
-
Marina Morgado Garcia, Rogério Renato Silva, Ligia Fonseca Spinel, Igor da Costa Borysow, Ramon Gonçalves Pereira, Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior, Daniel Holthausen Nunes, Marco Akerman, Pamela Santos Azevedo, Maria Cristina Marino Calvo, Patrícia Caroline Iacabo Correia Gomes, Francisco de Assis Acurcio, and Juliana Alvares-Teodoro
- Subjects
National health ,Service (business) ,Teledermatology ,Health economics ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Health Policy ,Decision tree ,Health services research ,Dermatology ,Telehealth ,medicine.disease ,Cost-minimization analysis ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical emergency ,business ,Referral and Consultation ,Brazil ,health care economics and organizations - Abstract
Aims: Cost-minimization analysis (CMA) comparing the teledermatology service of the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil with the provision of conventional care, from the societal perspective. Patients & methods: All costs related to direct patient care were considered in calculation of outpatient costs. The evaluation was performed using the parameters avoided referrals and profile of hospitalizations. The economic analysis was developed through a decision tree. Results: Totally, 40% of 79,411 tests performed could be managed in primary care, avoiding commuting and expanding the patients’ access. The CMA showed the teledermatology service had a cost per patient of US$196.04, and the conventional care of US$245.66. Conclusion: In this scenario, teledermatology proved to be a cost-saving alternative to conventional care, reducing commuting costs.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF