Search

Contribution of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Their treatment, at an advanced stage, relies on combinations of chemotherapies, which have a limited range and duration of benefit. Immunotherapy has emerged in recent years as a new therapeutic approach for BTC. However, the benefit with currently available treatments seems more modest than in other tumor locations and the predictive markers of response to these treatments remain to be identified. This review article summarizes the rationale, current data, and prospects and challenges for the development of immunotherapy in BTC., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Overview of biliary tract cancer management practices in France: results of the ACABi national survey INTRODUCTION: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare. Their management has evolved in recent years. ACABi conducted a survey on the management practices of CVB in France. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed (June-July 2021) by the French digestive oncology societies. The data were analyzed according to the type of practice center (group A: university hospital or cancer comprehensive center, group B: general hospital or private hospital) RESULTS: 172 physicians (hepato-gastroenterologists: 58.0%, oncologists: 19.5% and surgeons: 18.3%), representing all French regions, responded. Access to echo-endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was identical between the groups (> 80%), unlike cholangioscopy (group A: 82.9%, group B: 63.6%). In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine was proposed in the majority (> 65%). For non-operable tumors, the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy was cisplatin/gemcitabine (CISGEM, 66.3%). In 38.5% of cases, it was not performed in the day hospital and only 13.6% proposed a break after a fixed number of courses. The most commonly used second-line treatment was 5FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 52.3%). Molecular profiling was performed in more than half of the patients for 41.1% of respondents in group A and 18.8% in group B. DISCUSSION: This survey shows the application of therapeutic standards but also certain practices diverging from the recommendations as well as disparities between centers., (Copyright © 2022 Société Française du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting Programmed death-1 (PD-1) have shown their efficacy in advanced MSI/dMMR (microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair) tumors. The MSI/dMMR status predicts clinical response to ICI. The promising results evaluating ICI in localized MSI/dMMR tumors in neoadjuvant setting need to be confirmed in MSI/dMMR solid tumors. The aim of the IMHOTEP trial is to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment in MSI/dMMR tumors regarding the pathological complete response rate., Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, phase II study including 120 patients with localized MSI/dMMR carcinomas suitable for curative surgery. A single dose of pembrolizumab will be administered before the surgery planned 6 weeks later. Primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab according to pathological complete tumor response. Secondary objectives are to assess safety, recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Ancillary studies will assess molecular and immunological biomarkers predicting response/resistance to ICI. First patient was enrolled in December 2021., Discussion: The IMHOTEP trial will be one of the first clinical trial investigating perioperative ICI in localized MSI/dMMR in a tumor agnostic setting. Assessing neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 is mandatory to improve MSI/dMMR patient's outcomes. The translational program will explore potential biomarker to improve our understanding of immune escape and response in this ICI neoadjuvant setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest CC declares a consulting and advisory board for Amgen, Servier, and received honoria from Servier, Amgen. TA received honoraria from Servier, Pierre fabre, Amgen, AstraZeneca and declares consulting for Bioven, Servier, SIRTEC, MSD. RC received honoraria from MSD Oncology, Pierre Fabre, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, declares consulting from Exeliom Biosciences, Enterome Bioscience and received research funding from Servier Institute. OD received honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi, Merck Serono, MSD, Servier, Ipsen, Keocyt and declares consulting for Merck Serono, Sanofi, MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis. LE declares consulting for BMS and Servier. FG declares research grant from Roche, AstraZeneca and consulting for Astrazenca, Roche, Sanofi, BMS, MSD, Merck-Serono, Amgen. EL declares consulting for Roche, Servier, Ipsen, Bayer, BTG, MSD. CN received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, Incyte Biosciences, Merck, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Nutricia, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier and research funding from Roche. ES received honoraria from Servier, Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre Fabre Oncology BMS, Sanofi, Research funding from Bayer, and declares consulting for Pierre Fabre Oncology. YT declares honoraria from MSD, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Amgen, Servier, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre, AAA and consulting for Merck. DT received honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier/Pfizer, Ipsen, research funding from AstraZeneca, SERVIER, Roche, MSD, BTG, and declares consulting for Sanofi, MSD, Pierre Fabre, and AstraZeneca. A.Z. declares consulting and/or advisory boards for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Baxter, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, Zymeworks, and Daiichi. CDLF received honoraria from Amgen, Astra- Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Incyte Biosciences, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Pierre Fabre Oncologie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. FB, MBZ, SK, EC, PR and ES declares no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Mortality from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing worldwide and effective new treatments are urgently needed. The current treatment of metastatic PDAC in fit patients is based on two chemotherapy combinations (FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel) which were validated more than 8 years ago. Although almost all treatments targeting specific molecular alterations have failed so far when administered to unselected patients, encouraging results were observed in the small subpopulations of patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutations, and somatic gene fusions ( neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase, Neuregulin 1, which are enriched in KRAS wild-type PDAC), KRAS G12C mutations, or microsatellite instability. While targeted tumor metabolism therapies and immunotherapy have been disappointing, they are still under investigation in combination with other drugs. Optimizing pharmacokinetics and adapting available chemotherapies based on molecular signatures are other promising avenues of research. This review evaluates the current expectations and limits of available treatments and analyses the existing trials. A permanent search for actionable vulnerabilities in PDAC tumor cells and microenvironments will probably result in a more personalized therapeutic approach, keeping in mind that supportive care must also play a major role if real clinical efficacy is to be achieved in these patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Recently, we have witnessed impressive diagnostic and therapeutic changes for gastrointestinal cancer patients. New challenges brought by the COVID-19 pandemic have led us to re-evaluate our work priorities. Thanks to the commendable resilience of both investigators and patients, however, clinical research never stopped. In addition to conducting cutting-edge research and serving patients' needs, as EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, we are committed to pursuing educational initiatives beneficial to the entire European oncology community and beyond. In this regard, we have been providing critical discussions of new data from major international meetings. In this article, we discuss results of important selected studies presented at the 2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, putting them in perspectives and highlighting potential implications for routine practice. With the number of in-person attendees and practice-changing/informing trials presented, this meeting represented a milestone in the return to normality as well as in the fight against cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Francesco Sclafani. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: AMAL Therapeutics, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Nordic Pharma, Roche. Grants/Research funding: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi. Travel grants: Bayer, Lilly. Supported by: La Fondation Contre le Cancer. Elisa Fontana. Employee of Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) International. Anna Dorothea Wagner. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Merck, Hoffmann-La Roche, Lilly, Pierre Fabre Pharma, Sanofi, Servier. Grants/Research funding: Roche. Juan Valle. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Agios, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Genoscience Pharma, Hutchison Medipharma, Imaging Equipment Ltd (AAA), Incyte, Ipsen, Mundipharma EDO, Mylan, NuCana, QED, Servier, Sirtex, Zymeworks. Grants: NuCana. Elizabeth Smyth. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: AMAL Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Elsevier, Five Prime Therapeutics, Gritstone Oncology, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, Zymeworks. Grants/Research funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Radka Obermannova. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Servier. Grants/Research funding: Roche. Cindy Neuzillet. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, Incyte Biosciences, Merck, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Nutricia, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier D. Grants/Research funding: AstraZeneca, Fresenius Kabi, Nutricia, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Roche, Servier. Manfred P Lutz. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Servier. Thibaud Koessler. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: AMAL Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Roche, Vifor. Dirk Arnold. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: ACE Oncology, Amgen, Art Tempi Media, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Personal Aptitude Health, Clinical Care Options (CCO), CRA International, Eli Lilly, Hexal, Imedex, Ipsen, IQVIA, Ketchum, MedAhead, Merck Serono, Merck, Sharp and Dome, PharmaCept, Pierre Fabre Pharma, PRMA Consulting, Roche, Samsung Bioepsis, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Streamitup Germany, Tactics MD LLC, Terumo, WebMD Health Corp, Elsevier. Leadership positions: OncoLytics (Project Lead). Maria Alsina. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Lilly, Servier. Markus Moehler. Consultancy/advisory role and honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, MCI Group, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Taiho. Grants/Research funding: AIO, Amgen, BMBF or HORIZON Europe, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EORTC, German Cancer Aid, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer. All conflicts of interest declared by the authors are outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Gene fusions provide access to new therapeutic opportunities for patients treated for a colorectal cancer (CRC). However, they do not excess 1% of patients. A better identification of patients in whom gene fusions are highly prevalent is a major issue in a therapeutic and medico-economics perspective. This study assesses the rates of gene fusions in CRC patients with MSI/RAS-BRAF WT in our routine practice detected with a commercially available NGS-based fusion panel. Among the 130 MSI CRC tumors, 43 (33%) were KRAS-NRAS-BRAF WT . A gene fusion was detected in 7 (25.9%) of the 27 MSI/RAS-BRAF WT samples, which had RNA suitable for analysis after quality control. These fusions involved mainly NTRK1/3 (n = 5), as well as ALK (n = 1) and BRAF (n = 1). In the present study, we confirm that patients with MSI/RAS-BRAF WT CRCs represent a subpopulation in which targetable gene fusions are overrepresented. Our results support the use of a two-step algorithm for molecular screening, in which metastatic CRC patients would have routine MSI and RAS/BRAF testing, and then only those with MSI/RAS-BRAFWT would be screened with dedicated NGS RNA panel for gene fusions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: CN provided consultancy or received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, Incyte Biosciences, Merck, MSD, Viatris, Novartis, Nutricia, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier; and received research funding from Roche. CN was coordinating investigator of clinical trials that received funding from OSE Immunotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Fresenius Kabi, Nutricia.

Main prognostic factors of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) are tumor size, differentiation, lymph node involvement, and male gender. However, they are insufficient to predict relapses after exclusive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Fusobacterium nucleatum has been associated with poor prognosis in several digestive cancers. In this study, we assessed the association between intratumoral F. nucleatum load and clinico-pathological features, relapse, and survival in patients with ASCC who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) after RT/CRT. We retrospectively analyzed surgical samples from a cohort of 166 patients with ASCC who underwent APR. F. nucleatum 16S rRNA gene sequences were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR. We associated F. nucleatum load with classical clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) using Cox regression univariate and multivariate analyses. Tumors harboring high loads of F. nucleatum (highest tercile) showed longer OS and DFS (median: not reached vs. 50.1 months, p = 0.01, and median: not reached vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.007, respectively). High F. nucleatum load was a predictor of longer OS (HR = 0.55, p = 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.50, p = 0.02) in multivariate analysis. High F. nucleatum load is an independent favorable prognostic factor in patients with ASCC who underwent APR.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and deadliest cancer worldwide with an overall survival rate, all stages combined, of still <10% at 5 years. The poor prognosis is attributed to challenges in early detection, a low opportunity for radical resection, limited response to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and resistance to immune therapy. Moreover, pancreatic tumoral cells are surrounded by an abundant desmoplastic stroma, which is responsible for creating a mechanical barrier, preventing appropriate vascularization and leading to poor immune cell infiltration. Accumulated evidence suggests that PDAC is impaired with multiple "immune defects", including a lack of high-quality effector cells (CD4, CD8 T cells, dendritic cells), barriers to effector cell infiltration due to that desmoplastic reaction, and a dominance of immune cells such as regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and M2 macrophages, resulting in an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Although recent studies have brought new insights into PDAC immune TME, its understanding remains not fully elucidated. Further studies are required for a better understanding of human PDAC immune TME, which might help to develop potent new therapeutic strategies by correcting these immune defects with the hope to unlock the resistance to (immune) therapy. In this review, we describe the main effector immune cells and immunosuppressive actors involved in human PDAC TME, as well as their implications as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Background: Little is known about the epidemiology and patterns of care of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in daily clinical practice. The aims of this study were to estimate the number of declared cases during the study period 2014-2015 in France from a hospitalization database and to describe the healthcare trajectories of these patients., Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out using the French nationwide prospective hospitalization database. All pts with a new diagnosis of "carcinoma of the intrahepatic bile duct" who had a first hospital stay in the Medicine, Surgery and Obstetrics departments (MSO) between 2014 and 2015 with a 2-year follow-up were included. Data related to the first identified stay (S1) in the MSO and on all subsequent stays in the MSO, aftercare and rehabilitation or home hospitalization were analysed., Findings: A total of 3650 new iCCA cases were identified. At S1 (admission via emergency room (ER) in 28%), the median age of the patients was 73 years, 57% were male and 35% had metastases. Jaundice/anaemia/ascites/cholangitis were reported in 17%/16%/12%/7% of patients, respectively. The care of patients at S1 was mainly provided in general hospitals (CHG, 60%). A total of 896 (24%) patients died during S1. They were more frequently hospitalized via the ER (48% vs 23%), metastatic (52% vs 35%) and symptomatic. Subsequent stays were identified for 2507 (69%) patients. Three healthcare pathways were defined: surgery ( n  = 519; 14%), chemotherapy (CT) without surgery ( n  = 812; 22%) and best supportive care (BSC) ( n  = 2319; 63%). CT, surgery and BSC were most frequently performed in the cancer centres, university hospitals and CHG, respectively., Interpretation: This medico administrative study reveals a higher number of iCCA cases than that previously reported by registries and highlights the severity of this disease., Funding: This study was sponsored by Incyte Biosciences International Sàrl., Geneva, Switzerland. INCYTE validated the design of the study, the analysis, the interpretation of data and the writing of the manuscript which was first written by the 2 experts and CEMKA., Competing Interests: Honoraria from INCYTE for being experts of scientific committee. Grants or contracts from any entity: Roche Consulting fees: Pierre Fabre, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte Biosciences, Mylan, Baxter, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi, Sanofi Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte Biosciences, Mylan, Baxter, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi, Sanofi Support for attending meetings and/or travel: MSD, Mylan, Merck, OSE Immunotherapeutics Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Mylan Other financial or non-financial interests: Clinical trials: OSE Immunotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Servier Astrid Lièvre Honoraria from INCYTE for being experts of scientific committee. Grant for laboratory research and support for clinical trials: Bayer, Lilly, Novartis Consulting fees: AAA, Amgen, Bayer, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis Pierre Fabre, Sandoz and Servier Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: AAA, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, HalioDx, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and Servier. Support for attending meetings and/or travel: AAA, Bayer, Ipsen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Servier Corinne Emery, Stéphane Bouée and Clément Tessier are employed at CEMKA, a consultancy which received grants from INCYTE to perform the project., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Introduction: The Association for education and research of interns in oncology (AERIO) conducted a national survey of the 2020-year oncology residents promotion in the "phase socle". The objective was to collect and analyze their motivations, as well as the objectives and limitations in the life and career of the residents during this first year of residency., Methods: A questionnaire included 45 closed questions divided into 6 sections describing: the demographic characteristics of the population, the commitment of the students' and their clinical and academic expectations in the, their training, their life and career objectives, and their commitment in associative life., Results: Seventy-eight of 119 residents participated (66%), of which 68 (87.2%) completed the questionnaire entirely. The population was predominantly women (60%) with a median age of 24 years. The choice between medical or radiation oncology was mostly undefined (87%) and 15% of the residents considered to change their medical specialty. The average hospital work time reported was predominantly between 45 and 65hours per week (83%). Sixty-nine percent were primarily interested in clinical research. One out of two residents (52%) did not have access to their half-day of training per week., Discussion: This national survey made possible to analyze the perception of oncology young residents, as well as their career aspirations and their relationship to research., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Whether triplet chemotherapy is superior to doublet chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is unknown., Methods: In this open-label, randomized phase II-III study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional fluorouracil (mFOLFIRINOX), or cisplatin and gemcitabine (CISGEM) for a maximum of 6 months. We report the results of the phase II part, where the primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate among the patients who received at least one dose of treatment (modified intention-to-treat population) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (statistical assumptions: 6-month PFS rate ≥ 59%, 73% expected)., Results: A total of 191 patients (modified intention-to-treat population, 185: mFOLFIRINOX, 92; CISGEM, 93) were randomly assigned in 43 French centers. After a median follow-up of 21 months, the 6-month PFS rate was 44.6% (90% CI, 35.7 to 53.7) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 47.3% (90% CI, 38.4 to 56.3) in the CISGEM arm. Median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.7) in the CISGEM arm. Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.2) in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 16.1) in the CISGEM arm. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 72.8% of patients in the mFOLFIRINOX arm and 72.0% of patients in the CISGEM arm (toxic deaths: mFOLFIRINOX arm, two; CISGEM arm, one)., Conclusion: mFOLFIRINOX triplet chemotherapy did not meet the primary study end point. CISGEM doublet chemotherapy remains the first-line standard in advanced BTC., Competing Interests: Jean marc PhelipHonoraria: Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Amgen, Lilly, Servier, BayerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Bayer, SanofiResearch Funding: Roche, Merck SeronoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Merck Serono, Bayer, Servier, Sanofi Jérôme DesrameExpert Testimony: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Hospira Julien EdelineConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, MSD, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Roche, Basilea, AstraZeneca, Merck SeronoResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, BeigeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche Eric TerrebonneConsulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Servier Pierre MichelHonoraria: Bayer, Servier Laetitia DahanHonoraria: Amgen, BMS, Servier, Oseus, Mylan Vincent BourgeoisConsulting or Advisory Role: ServierTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Servier, Sanofi Faiza Khemissa AkouzLeadership: Bayer, SanofiTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi, Ipsen, Servier, Roche Emilie SoularueConsulting or Advisory Role: ServierSpeakers' Bureau: BMSTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Servier Yann MolinConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen Oncology Thierry LecomteConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Merck Serono, Servier, Amgen, Sanofi, Amgen, Ipsen, Pierre FabreTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ipsen, Servier/Pfizer François GhiringhelliHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Roche/Genentech Romain CoriatConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis/Ipsen, Bayer, AmgenResearch Funding: IpsenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pierre Fabre, Amgen Cindy NeuzilletHonoraria: Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck¸ MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Incyte, Mylan, Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, NutriciaResearch Funding: Roche, AstraZeneca, OSE ImmunotherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD Oncology, Merck, Amgen, Mylan David MalkaHonoraria: Roche, Bayer, Servier, Sanofi, HalioDx, Pierre Fabre, Viatris, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, LEO PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Sanofi, Merck Serono, MSD, Servier, Bayer, Incyte, Amgen, HalioDx, Agios, Bristol Myers SquibTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck Serono, Servier, AmgenNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

PARP inhibitors are effective in different types of tumors such as ovarian, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer. Many studies are in progress and may lead to prescription evolution. PARP inhibitors prescription is almost reserved to patients with a constitutional BRCA mutation or a somatic BRCA alteration or a tumor with a deficiency in homologous recombination. Nowadays, the diagnosis of homologous recombination deficit, HRD, is possible with the prescription of a myChoice CDx (Myriad) test. PARP inhibitors are studied in association with chemotherapy and targeted therapies but also with radiotherapy and with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Access to PARP inhibitors is challenged with the emergence of resistance mechanism. Various trials are now studying the possibility of reversing these resistance mechanisms., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the nutrition and physical activity (PA) management in digestive oncology. This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in digestive oncology, nutrition and supportive care. It is based on published guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations are graded according to the level of evidence. Malnutrition affects more than half of patients with digestive cancers and is often underdiagnosed. It has multiple negative consequences on survival, quality of life and risk of treatment complications. Consequently, in addition to anticancer treatments, supportive care including nutritional support and PA plays a central role in the management of digestive cancers. It is crucial to detect malnutrition (diagnostic criteria updated in 2019) early, to prevent it and to act against it at all stages of the cancer and at all times of the care pathway. In this context, we proposed recommendations for the evaluation and management in nutrition and PA in digestive oncology for each stage of the disease (perioperative setting, during radiation therapy, during systemic treatments, at the palliative phase, after cancer). Guidelines for nutrition and PA management aim at increasing awareness about malnutrition in oncology. They are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CN: Consultancy/honoraria: Pierre Fabre, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte Biosciences, Mylan, Baxter, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi; Research funding: Roche; Clinical trials: OSE Immunotherapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merus. A-MF: Pierre Fabre, Ceformed, MéthodCO. EF: Baxter, Nutricia, Fresenius Kabi, Aguettant, BBraun. XH: clinical research funding from AbbVie; Abivax; Alphasigma; Celgene; Gilead Science, Inc; Eli Lilly; Enterome, Janssen; InDex Pharmaceuticals; Pfizer; Roche; Salix; Takeda; Theravance; advisory boards for AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Arkopharma, Astellas, Janssen, Nutricia, Pfizer, Sangano, Takeda; lectures and educational activities for AbbVie, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ferring, Janssen, MSD, Mylan, Nutricia, Pfizer, Sanofi-Advantis, Tillots and Takeda. AL: grants from Bayer Lilly, Merck and Novartis; personal fees from AAA, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, HalioDx, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and Servier; non-financial support from AAA, Amgen, Bayer, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Servier and Integragen. TM: Baxter, Nutricia, Nestle. BR: honoraria from Fresenius Kabi for Scientific Board (NUTRICANCER2 and SCAN studies). SS: Baxter, B. Braun, Fresenius-Kabi, Laboratoires Grand-Fontaine, Nestlé Health Science and Nutricia. DV: Fresenius Kabi, Nutricia, Nestle Health Science. OB: Merck KGaA, Roche, Bayer, Astra-Zeneca, Grunenthal, MSD, Amgen, Servier and Pierre Fabre., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Competing Interests: I declare consultancy fees or honoraria from Pierre Fabre, Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte Biosciences, Mylan, Baxter, Nutricia, and Fresenius Kabi, and research funding from Roche, and I am a coordinating investigator of academic clinical trials funded by OSE Immunotherapeutics and AstraZeneca.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTC) exhibit a poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival rates around 15%, all stages combined. Most of these primary liver malignancies are metastatic at diagnostic, with only limited therapeutic options, relying mainly on systemic therapies. Treatment modalities are different yet partially overlapping between HCC and BTC. The complex molecular profile of BTC yields to several actionable therapeutic targets, contrary to HCC that remains the field of antiangiogenic drugs in non-molecularly selected patients. Immunotherapy is now validated in the first line in HCC in combination with bevacizumab, while clinical activity of single agent immunotherapy appears limited to a subset of patients in BTC, still poorly characterized, and combinations are currently under investigation. In this review, we provide a critical evaluation and grading of clinical relevance on (i) the main prognostic biomarkers in HCC and BTC, (ii) the main theragnostic biomarkers in both tumors, and lastly (iii) what is recommended in clinical practice.

Changes in the oral microbiome, particularly Fusobacterium nucleatum, are associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). F. nucleatum has been reported to modulate local immunity in cancers. We aimed to assess the association between intratumoral F. nucleatum and clinico-pathological features, relapse, and overall survival (OS) in two independent cohorts of patients with OSCC, and to explore the interplay with immune-related genes. We retrospectively analyzed tissue samples from a first cohort of 122 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, including 61 OSCC (cohort #1), and a second cohort of 90 additional OSCC (cohort #2). We then performed a sensitivity analysis on the merged cohort of OSCC patients (N = 151). F. nucleatum 16S rRNA gene sequences were quantified using real-time quantitative PCR. The presence of gram-negative bacteria and macrophages was confirmed by LPS and CD163 immunostainings, respectively. F. nucleatum positivity was associated with older age, less alcohol and combined alcohol plus tobacco consumption, and less frequent lymph node invasion. There was a trend for a lower recurrence rate in F. nucleatum-positive cases, with less metastatic relapses compared to F. nucleatum-negative tumors, and significantly longer OS, relapse-free and metastasis-free survival. F. nucleatum status was independently associated with OS in multivariate analysis. Immune-related gene and immunohistochemistry analyses showed that gram-negative bacteria load inversely correlated with M2 macrophages. F. nucleatum-associated OSCC has a specific immune microenvironment, is more frequent in older, non-drinking patients, and associated with a favorable prognosis.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) incidence and related-deaths are increasing worldwide. PDAC is characterized by poor prognosis due to late diagnosis, high metastatic capacity and resistance to therapy. This is partially due to its specific microenvironment, where the stroma is prominent over tumor cells. Besides the oral and gut microbiota, the intratumor microbiome, i.e. the bacterial and fungal microorganisms present within the tumor, was recently introduced as a new partner of the tumor microenvironment of PDAC modulating pancreatic carcinogenesis, intratumor immune infiltrates, and response to chemotherapy. In this review, we propose an overview of current knowledge about the roles of bacteria and fungi in PDAC development and biology, and discuss potential therapeutic implications., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The IDEA collaboration showed that the type and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer (CC) could be adjusted according to the schedule of chemotherapy and the level of risk. We aimed at evaluating the implementation of IDEA's results in real-life practice for stage III CC., Material and Methods: All clinicians registered in the French oncology cooperative groups GERCOR, FFCD, and UNICANCER GI mailing lists were invited to participate to an online anonymized nationwide survey from January 30, 2019 to March 31, 2019. Proportions were compared using the χ 2 test., Results: A total of 213 physicians answered the survey. Of these, 173 (81%) considered that 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was the new standard of care for low-risk (pT1-3/N1) stage III CC, and 99% considered that 6 months remained the standard of care for high-risk (pT4 and/or pN2) stage III CC. In patients under 70 years, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 months was prescribed by 74% of the participants in low-risk CC, whereas 6 months of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) was preferred for high-risk CC in 94% of cases. For patients over 70 years with good performance status and no comorbidities, 172 (81%) physicians prescribed oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for low-risk CC (3 months, 144 of 172%; 88%), and 200 (94%) physicians prescribed oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk CC (6 months, 199 of 200%; 99.5%)., Conclusions: The IDEA results have been practice-changing as French physicians have implemented 3 months of CAPOX for patients with low-risk stage III CC, substituting from 6 months of FOLFOX, which remains the preferred regimen for high-risk patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The IMMUNOBIL PRODIGE 57 trial is a non-comparative randomized phase II study assessing the efficacy and safety of the durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1) and tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA4) combination with or without weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Taxanes have already been safely combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in other tumors. We report results of the 20-patient safety run-in., Methods: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg at day 1 [D1] of each cycle)/tremelimumab (75 mg at D1 for 4 cycles; Arm A) or durvalumab/tremelimumab with paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 at D1, D8, D15; Arm B) every 28 days., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled (Arm A/B: 10/10). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Arm A. Six DLTs were observed in five patients (50%) in Arm B, meeting a stopping rule for the trial inclusions. DLTs included three serious anaphylactic reactions (with one cardiac arrest), two enterocolitis, and one infectious pneumopathy with septic shock. There were no patients with history of personal or familial auto-immune disease., Conclusion: The safety run-in part of IMMUNOBIL PRODIGE 57 raised concerns regarding co-administration of paclitaxel with durvalumab and tremelimumab in BTC, with an unexpected increase in anaphylactic adverse events. Phase II of the study will only evaluate the durvalumab and tremelimumab combination arm., Clinicaltrials Registration: NCT03704480., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Benoît Rousseau served in a consulting/advisory role for Bayer, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Servier and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bayer, Servier, Astellas. Romain Cohen received honoraria from Servier, Amgen, and Sanofi. Jean-Frédéric Blanc is a member of the advisory board for Bayer, IPSEN, ESAI. Meher Ben Abdelghani has COI with Amgen, Sanofi, Bayer, Roche, Servier. Laëtitia Dahan reports personal grants for clinical research for Ipsen, Lilly, MSD and Sanofi; for payment for lectures and consultancy for Amgen, Baxalta, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Sanofi and Roche; travel grants from Celgene, Ipsen and Sanofi. Jean-Philippe Metges has COI with Amgen, Merck. Christophe Tournigand received honoraria from Roche, Eli Lilly, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and research Funding from Roche. David Tougeron is the coordinator of an academic study in part support by Astra Zeneca (DURIGAST trial). David Tougeon has fundings for Astra Zeneca. Dewy Vernerey served in a consulting/advisory role for GERCOR HalioDX Cellprothera Incyte et Merck. Anthony Turpin has served in a consulting/advisory role and/or received honoraria for Amgen, Merck, Servier, Mylan and has received travel, accommodations, and expenses from Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi. Cindy Neuzillet has served in a consulting/advisory role and or received honoraria for Servier, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, Nutricia, Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, Mylan, OSE Immunotherapeutics, and received research funding from Roche. Other authors declare no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA) present high protein synthesis rates. CAFs express the G-protein-coupled somatostatin receptor sst1. The sst1 agonist SOM230 blocks CAF protumoral features in vitro and in immunocompromised mice. We have explored here the therapeutic potential of SOM230, and underlying mechanisms, in immunocompetent models of murine PDA mimicking the heavy fibrotic and immunosuppressive stroma observed in patient tumors., Methods: Large-scale mass spectrometry analyses were performed on media conditioned from 9 patient PDA-derived CAF primary cultures. Spontaneous transgenic and experimental (orthotopic co-graft of tumor cells plus CAFs) PDA-bearing mice were longitudinally ultrasound-monitored for tumor and metastatic progression. Histopathology and flow cytometry analyses were performed on primary tumors and metastases. Stromal signatures were functionally validated through bioinformatics using several published, and 1 original, PDA database., Results: Proteomics on the CAF secretome showed that SOM230 controls stromal activities including inflammatory responses. Among the identified secreted proteins, we validated that colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) (a macrophage growth factor) was reduced by SOM230 in the tumor and plasma of PDA-harboring mice, alongside intratumor stromal normalization (reduced CAF and macrophage activities), and dramatic metastasis reduction. In transgenic mice, these SOM230 benefits alleviate the chemotherapy-induced (gemcitabine) immunosuppressive stroma reshaping. Mechanistically, SOM230 acts in vivo on CAFs through sst1 to disrupt prometastatic CAF production of CSF-1 and cross-talk with macrophages. We found that in patients, stromal CSF-1 was associated with aggressive PDA forms., Conclusions: We propose SOM230 as an antimetastatic therapy in PDA for its capacity to remodel the fibrotic and immunosuppressive myeloid stroma. This pharmacotherapy should benefit PDA patients treated with chemotherapies., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus platinum chemotherapy has been recently established as a second-line (L2) preferred option in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) (ABC-06 phase III trial). However, the overall survival (OS) benefit was limited and comparison with FP monotherapy was not available. Our aim was to assess the OS of patients treated with a FP monotherapy compared to a doublet with irinotecan or platinum in L2. We performed a retrospective analysis of two large multicenter prospective cohorts: a French cohort (28 centers) and an Italian cohort (9 centers). All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving FP-based L2 after gemcitabine plus cisplatin/gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. A subgroup analysis according to performance status (PS) and an exploratory analysis according to platinum sensitivity in L1 were planned. In the French cohort (n = 351), no significant OS difference was observed between the FP monotherapy and doublet groups (median OS: 5.6 vs 6.8 months, P = .65). Stratification on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS showed similar results in PS 0-1 and 2. Median OS was not different between FP monotherapy, platinum- and irinotecan-based doublets (5.6 vs 7.1 vs 6.7 months, P = .68). Similar findings were observed in the Italian cohort (n = 174) and in the sensitivity analysis in pooled cohorts (n = 525). No L2 regimen seemed superior over others in the platinum resistant/refractory or sensitive subgroups. Our results suggest that FP monotherapy is as active as FP doublets in aBTC in L2, regardless of the patient PS and country, and could be a therapeutic option in this setting., (© 2020 UICC.)

Background: Cancer patients are thought to have an increased risk of developing severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and of dying from the disease. In this work, predictive factors for COVID-19 severity and mortality in cancer patients were investigated., Patients and Methods: In this large nationwide retro-prospective cohort study, we collected data on patients with solid tumours and COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1 and 11th June 2020. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality and COVID-19 severity, defined as admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation and/or death, was one of the secondary end-points., Results: From April 4 to 11th June 2020, 1289 patients were analysed. The most frequent cancers were digestive and thoracic. Altogether, 424 (33%) patients had a severe form of COVID-19 and 370 (29%) patients died. In multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with death were male sex (odds ratio 1.73, 95%CI: 1.18-2.52), The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG PS) ≥ 2 (OR 3.23, 95%CI: 2.27-4.61), updated Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01-1.16) and admission to ICU (OR 3.62, 95%CI 2.14-6.11). The same factors, age along with corticosteroids before COVID-19 diagnosis, and thoracic primary tumour site were independently associated with COVID-19 severity. None of the anticancer treatments administered within the previous 3 months had any effect on mortality or COVID-19 severity, except for cytotoxic chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients with detectable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which was associated with a slight increase of the risk of death (OR 1.53; 95%CI: 1.00-2.34; p = 0.05). A total of 431 (39%) patients had their systemic anticancer treatment (such as chemotherapy, targeted or immune therapy) interrupted or stopped following diagnosis of COVID-19., Conclusions: Mortality and COVID-19 severity in cancer patients are high and are associated with general characteristics of patients. We found no deleterious effects of recent anticancer treatments, except for cytotoxic chemotherapy in the RT-PCR-confirmed subgroup of patients. In almost 40% of patients, the systemic anticancer therapy was interrupted or stopped after COVID-19 diagnosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Pr Lièvre reports grants from BayerLilly, Merck and Novartis, personal fees from AAA, Amgen, Bayer, BMS,Celgene, HalioDx, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Servier and non-financial support from AAA, Amgen, bayer, Incite, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Servier and Integragen outside of the submitted work. Dr. Turpin reports personal fees from MYLAN, personal fees from MERCK SERONO, personal fees from AMGEN, non-financial support from MERCK-SERONO, non-financial support from SANOFI, non-financial support from PFIZER outside the submitted work. Dr. Ahle reports grants from Biogen, grants from Novartis, grants from Roche, grants from Sanofi, grants from Abbvie, outside the submitted work.Dr Bouché reports personal fees from Merck KGaA, Roche Genentech, Bayer, Astra-Zeneca, Grunenthal, MSD, Amgen, Servier, and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. Dr. Neuzillet reports personal fees from SERVIER, other from OSE Immunotherapeutic, grants from ROCHE, personal fees and other from AstraZeneca, personal fees and other from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Incyte, personal fees from Mylan, personal fees from Baxter, personal fees from Nutricia, personal fees from Fresenius-Kabi, outside the submitted work . Pr Michel reports personal fees from Bayer, Servier, Amgen, Shire and Lilly and non-personal fees from Bayer, Merck, Amgen, Shire, Roche and Lilly outside the submitted work. Dr. Canellas reports personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Aztra Zeneca, non-financial support from Boerhinger Ingheleim, non-financial support from Roche, outside the submitted work . Dr. Wislez reports personal fees from Boeringher Ingelheim, personal fees and non-financial support from ROCHE, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Amgen, outside the submitted work. Dr. Mansi reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from Exact Science, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work . Dr Colomba received personnal fees from IPSEN, BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, GSK outside the submitted work. Pr. Idbaih reports grants and other from Carthera (september 2019), grants from Transgene, grants from Sanofi, grants from Air Liquide, other from Leo Pharma, grants from Nutritheragene, outside the submitted work. Pr. Aparicio reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees from Ipsen, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Servier, personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are considered the most abundant type of stromal cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), playing a critical role in tumour progression and chemoresistance; however, a druggable target on CAFs has not yet been identified. Here we report that focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity (evaluated based on 397 tyrosine phosphorylation level) in CAFs is highly increased compared to its activity in fibroblasts from healthy pancreas. Fibroblastic FAK activity is an independent prognostic marker for disease-free and overall survival of PDAC patients (cohort of 120 PDAC samples). Genetic inactivation of FAK within fibroblasts (FAK kinase-dead, KD) reduces fibrosis and immunosuppressive cell number within primary tumours and dramatically decreases tumour spread. FAK pharmacologic or genetic inactivation reduces fibroblast migration/invasion, decreases extracellular matrix (ECM) expression and deposition by CAFs, modifies ECM track generation and negatively impacts M2 macrophage polarization and migration. Thus, FAK activity within CAFs appears as an independent PDAC prognostic marker and a druggable driver of tumour cell invasion., (© 2020 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.)

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial neoplasms, with a poor prognosis. Advanced BTC remains a challenging, non-curable disease. In this review, we provide an overview of the medical treatment options in advanced BTC and new strategies under development. Gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy in this setting. Recently, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen became the only second-line therapy to be prospectively validated beyond failure of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination in a phase III study, even though chemotherapy yielded modest survival improvement over best supportive care. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and antiangiogenic antibodies have not demonstrated any survival benefit in unselected patient populations. In recent years, knowledge about the molecular heterogeneity of BTC has considerably increased with the advent of large-scale genomic and transcriptomic analyses, opening up new perspectives for so-called personalised targeted therapies. Patients with BTC may be particularly good candidates for biomarker-driven strategies in clinical practice. Among current developments, the targeting of fibroblast growth factor receptor and isocitrate dehydrogenase gene alterations are the most promising avenues, and combination immunotherapies are under investigation., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Our study describes the feasibility and efficacy of a first-line FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU], folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by de-escalation as a maintenance strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer., Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from January 2011 to December 2018. FOLFIRINOX de-escalation was defined as stopping oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan after at least four cycles of FOLFIRINOX, without evidence of disease progression. Maintenance schedules were fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (intravenous or oral [capecitabine]), FOLFOX (5FU, oxaliplatin), or FOLFIRI (5FU, irinotecan). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were first progression-free survival (PFS1), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and toxicity., Results: Among 321 patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, 147 (45.8%) were included. Median OS was 16.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7-20.3) and median PFS1 was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.5-10.4). The preferred maintenance regimen was FOLFIRI in 66 (45%) patients versus 5FU monotherapy in 52 (35%) and FOLFOX in 25 (17%) patients. Among 118 patients who received maintenance CT with FOLFIRI or 5FU, there was no difference in PFS1 (median, 9.0 vs. 10.1 months, respectively; p = .33) or OS (median, 16.6 vs. 18.7 months; p = .86) between the two maintenance regimens. Reintroduction of FOLFIRINOX was performed in 20.2% of patients, with a median PFS2 of 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.0-22.3). The rates of grade 3-4 toxicity were significantly higher with FOLFIRI maintenance CT than with 5FU (41% vs. 22%; p = .03), especially for neuropathy (73% vs. 9%)., Conclusion: 5FU monotherapy maintenance appeared to be as effective as FOLFIRI, in a FOLFIRINOX de-escalation strategy, which is largely used in France., Implications for Practice: FOLFIRINOX de-escalation and maintenance is a feasible strategy in advanced pancreatic cancer that decreases chemotherapy toxicity to improve both survival and quality of life. Survivals in patients with maintenance therapy are clinically meaningful. Fluoropyrimidine monotherapy maintenance seems to be as efficient as FOLFIRI and should be a reference arm in future pancreatic cancer maintenance trials., (© AlphaMed Press 2020.)

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are prominent cells within the tumor microenvironment, by communicating with other cells within the tumor and by secreting the extracellular matrix components. The discovery of the immunogenic role of CAFs has made their study particularly attractive due to the potential applications in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Indeed, CAFs are highly involved in tumor immune evasion by physically impeding the immune system and interacting with both myeloid and lymphoid cells. However, CAFs do not represent a single cell entity but are divided into several subtypes with different functions that may be antagonistic. Considering that CAFs are orchestrators of the tumor microenvironment and modulate immune cells, targeting their functions may be a promising strategy. In this review, we provide an overview of (i) the mechanisms involved in immune regulation by CAFs and (ii) the therapeutic applications of CAFs modulation to improve the antitumor immune response and the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Introduction: The benefits of physical activity (PA) in breast cancer are currently recognized in primary prevention. The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and then the National Cancer Institute (INCa) have reported conflicting results regarding the impact of post-diagnosis PA on breast cancer outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the association between PA after breast cancer diagnosis and overall mortality, specific mortality and risk of breast cancer recurrence in the literature., Methods: Randomized trials, prospective cohorts and meta-analyses studying post-diagnosis PA and overall mortality, breast cancer mortality or risk of recurrence after breast cancer published between January 1, 2014 and October 1, 2019 were included. The articles selected by the INCa report prior to 2014 were included in the literature review., Results: Eighteen articles have been selected. Studies unanimously concluded that overall mortality was reduced by post-diagnosis PA practice. For specific mortality, 5 meta-analyses showed a significant decrease in breast cancer mortality and 2 found a decrease in the risk of recurrence., Conclusion: Post-diagnosis PA reduces overall mortality and appears to impact specific breast cancer mortality and risk of recurrence. However, these results need to be confirmed by larger randomized trials., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected clinical practice in oncology, leading to organizational, ethical, and medical issues. In particular, it has raised challenges in the context of competing care priorities between COVID-19 and cancer treatment. Residents on the front line face difficulties related to increasing care needs and urgent reorganization of health care systems while managing psychological stress and uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology residents., Methods and Materials: We conducted a national survey (39 questions) in France among oncology and radiation therapy residents to determine the psychological impact and professional difficulties (eg, reassignment, training/research time, supervision, teleworking, management of patients) associated with the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: Overall, 222 residents (medical oncologists, 61%; radiation therapists, 39%) participated in our survey, representing approximately one third of all residents and fellows in France. One third of respondents had been reassigned to a COVID-19 ward. Training and research activity decreased for 89% and 41% of respondents, respectively. Two thirds (70%) of respondents declared that they had faced ethical issues, 35% felt worried about their own health, and 23% experienced psychological distress. According to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 32% were anxious and 17% depressed. Consumption of tobacco, psychostimulants, and alcohol increased in 31%, 24%, and 29% of respondents, respectively., Conclusion: French oncology residents were highly affected by the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of professional activity and psychological impact. This national survey can be used as a basis for improved management, medical reorganization, and training of residents during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: Sarcopenia, present in more than 50% of digestive oncology patients, has a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Nutrition and adapted physical activity are two major interventions for the management of sarcopenia. However, young hepato-gastroenterologists, oncologists and surgeons in France have limited awareness on these topics. We aimed to evaluate the need for training programmes of physicians (residents and senior doctors) involved in digestive oncology on nutrition and adapted physical activity., Methods: A 42-question survey was developed, by a working group of clinicians, dieticians and adapted physical activity teachers, to assess five areas related to demographics of respondents, nutrition practices, nutrition training, adapted physical activity practices and adapted physical activity training. The national survey was undertaken between April and July of 2019., Results: 230 physicians participated in the survey; 34% were hepato-gastroenterologists, 31% were oncologists, 23% were surgeons and 40% were residents. Sixty-one per cent of participants had received training in nutrition and only 21% in adapted physical activity. Ninety per cent of the physicians expressed their desire for more effective training on these two topics. Disparities in clinical practices were observed between hepato-gastroenterologists, oncologists and surgeons., Conclusions: More initial and continuing training on nutrition and adapted physical activity is needed for French physicians in the current digestive oncology clinical practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CN reports personal fees from Servier, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, Nutricia, Baxter, Fresenius Kabi, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Roche and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. EH reports personal fees from Nutricia outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are now more effectively controlled using chemotherapy combinations such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (NabP) regimens with a subset of patients who achieve a sustained tumor stabilization or response. The next challenge is to design maintenance therapies that result in continued tumor control with minimal toxicity. Quality of life should always be a priority in these patients with prolonged survival. Gradually tapering off the intensity of chemotherapy by suppressing drug(s) in the combination is one option. Thus, maintenance with 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine as single agents after FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-NabP induction, respectively, seems to be a promising approach to minimize neurotoxicity while maintaining efficacy. Another option is to introduce maintenance drug(s) with different anti-tumoral actions. The recent example of olaparib in patients with BRCA mutated PDAC provides a promising proof-of-concept of a switch maintenance strategy in this setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: Pascal Hammel and Cindy Neuzillet: AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene and OSE Immunotherapeutics. The other authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this article., (© The Author(s), 2020.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and biliary tract cancers (BTC) display a poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival rates around 15%, all stages taken together. These primary liver malignancies are often diagnosed at advanced stages where therapeutic options are limited. Recently, immune therapy has opened new opportunities in oncology. Based on their high programmed death-ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, HCC and BTC are theoretically good candidates for immune checkpoint blockade. However, clinical activity of single agent immunotherapy appears limited to a subset of patients, which is still ill-defined, and combinations are under investigation. In this review, we provide an overview of (i) the biological rationale for immunotherapies in HCC and BTC, (ii) the current state of their clinical development, and (iii) the predictive value of immune signatures for both clinical outcome and response to these therapies.

Background: FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is an option for fit patients with metastatic (MPC) and locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) pancreatic cancer. However, no criteria reliably identify patients with better outcomes., Patients and Methods: We investigated putative prognostic factors among 137 MPC/LAPC patients treated with triplet chemotherapy. Association with 6-month survival status (primary endpoint) was assessed by multivariate logistic regression models. A nomogram predicting the risk of death at 6 months was built by assigning a numeric score to each identified variable, weighted on its level of association with survival. External validation was performed in an independent data set of 206 patients. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03590275)., Results: Four variables (performance status, liver metastases, baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were found to be associated with 6-month survival by multivariate analysis or had sufficient clinical plausibility to be included in the nomogram. Accuracy was confirmed in the validation cohort (C index = 0.762; 95% confidence interval, 0.713-0.825). After grouping all cases, 4 subsets with different outcomes were identified by 0, 1, 2, or > 2 poor prognostic features (P < .0001)., Conclusion: The nomogram we constructed accurately predicts the risk of death in the first 6 months after initiation of FOLFIRINOX in MPC/LAPC patients. This tool could be useful to guide communication about prognosis, and to inform the design and interpretation of clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second deadliest cancer worldwide, due to its high incidence and poor prognosis. Frequent initial presentation at advanced stages along with impaired liver function limit the use of a broad therapeutic arsenal in patients with HCC. Although main HCC oncogenic drivers have been deciphered in recent years (TERT, TP53, CTNNB1 mutations, miR122 and CDKN2A silencing), therapeutic applications derived from this molecular knowledge are still limited. Given its high vascularization and immunogenicity, antiangiogenics and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), respectively, are two therapeutic approaches that have shown efficacy in HCC. Depending on HCC immune profile, combinations of these therapies aim to modify the protumoral/antitumoral immune balance, and to reactivate and favor the intratumoral trafficking of cytotoxic T cells. Combination therapies involving antiangiogenics and ICI may be synergistic, because vascular endothelial growth factor A inhibition increases intratumoral infiltration and survival of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and decreases regulatory T lymphocyte recruitment, resulting in a more favorable immune microenvironment for ICI antitumoral activity. First results from clinical trials evaluating combinations of these therapies are encouraging with response rates never observed before in patients with HCC. A better understanding of the balance and interactions between protumoral and antitumoral immune cells will help to ensure the success of future therapeutic trials. Here, we present an overview of the current state of clinical development of antitumoral therapies in HCC and the biological rationale for their use. Moreover, translational studies on tumor tissue and blood, prior to and during treatment, will help to identify biomarkers and immune signatures with predictive value for both clinical outcome and response to combination therapies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the solid tumors with the poorest prognosis. The stroma of this tumor is abundant and composed of extracellular matrix and stromal cells (including cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune cells). Nerve fibers invading this stroma represent a hallmark of PDAC, involved in neural remodeling, which participates in neuropathic pain, cancer cell dissemination and tumor relapse after surgery. Pancreatic cancer-associated neural remodeling is regulated through functional interplays mediated by physical and molecular interactions between cancer cells, nerve cells and surrounding Schwann cells, and other stromal cells. In the present study, we show that Schwann cells (glial cells supporting peripheral neurons) can enhance aggressiveness (migration, invasion, tumorigenicity) of pancreatic cancer cells in a transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ)-dependent manner. Indeed, we reveal that conditioned medium from Schwann cells contains high amounts of TGFβ able to activate the TGFβ-SMAD signaling pathway in cancer cells. We also observed in human PDAC samples that high levels of TGFβ signaling activation were positively correlated with perineural invasion. Secretome analyses by mass spectrometry of Schwann cells and pancreatic cancer cells cultured alone or in combination highlighted the central role of TGFβ in neuro-epithelial interactions, as illustrated by proteomic signatures related to cell adhesion and motility. Altogether, these results demonstrate that Schwann cells are a meaningful source of TGFβ in PDAC, which plays a crucial role in the acquisition of aggressive properties by pancreatic cancer cells.

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) carcinogenesis has been clearly established, involving the expression of viral oncoproteins and optional viral DNA integration into the host genome. In this article, we describe the various mechanisms and sites of HPV DNA insertion and assess their prognostic and predictive value in a large series of patients with HPV-positive ASCC with long-term follow-up. We retrospectively analyzed 96 tumor samples from 93 HPV-positive ASCC patients using the Capture-HPV method followed by Next-Generation Sequencing, allowing determination of HPV genotype and identification of the mechanisms and sites of viral genome integration. We identified five different mechanistic signatures of HPV insertions. The distribution of HPV signatures differed from that previously described in HPV-positive cervical carcinoma ( p < 0.001). In ASCC samples, the HPV genome more frequently remained in episomal form (45.2%). The most common signature of HPV insertion was MJ-SC (26.9%), i.e., HPV-chromosomal junctions scattered at different loci. Functionally, HPV integration signatures were not associated with survival or response to treatment, but were associated with viral load ( p = 0.022) and PIK3CA mutation ( p = 0.0069). High viral load was associated with longer survival in both univariate ( p = 0.044) and multivariate ( p = 0.011) analyses. Finally, HPV integration occurred on most human chromosomes, but intragenic integration into the NFIX gene was recurrently observed ( n = 4/51 tumors). Overall, the distribution of mechanistic signatures of HPV insertions in ASCC was different from that observed in cervical carcinoma and was associated with viral load and PIK3CA mutation. We confirmed recurrent targeting of NFIX by HPV integration, suggesting a role for this gene in ASCC carcinogenesis.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) are orchestrators of the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) microenvironment. Stromal heterogeneity may explain differential pathophysiological roles of the stroma (pro- versus anti-tumoural) in PDAC. We hypothesised that multiple CAF functional subtypes exist in PDAC, that contribute to stromal heterogeneity through interactions with cancer cells. Using molecular and functional analysis of patient-derived CAF primary cultures, we demonstrated that human PDAC-derived CAFs display a high level of inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity. We identified at least four subtypes of CAFs based on transcriptomic analysis, and propose a classification for human PDAC-derived CAFs (pCAFassigner). Multiple CAF subtypes co-existed in individual patient samples. The presence of these CAF subtypes in bulk tumours was confirmed using publicly available gene expression profiles, and immunostainings of CAF subtype markers. Each subtype displayed specific phenotypic features (matrix- and immune-related signatures, vimentin and α-smooth muscle actin expression, proliferation rate), and was associated with an assessable prognostic impact. A prolonged exposure of non-tumoural pancreatic stellate cells to conditioned media from cancer cell lines (cancer education experiment) induced a CAF-like phenotype, including loss of capacity to revert to quiescence and an increase in the expression of genes related to CAF subtypes B and C. This classification demonstrates molecular and functional inter- and intra-tumoural heterogeneity of CAFs in human PDAC. Our subtypes overlap with those identified from single-cell analyses in other cancers, and pave the way for the development of therapies targeting specific CAF subpopulations in PDAC. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland., (© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Introduction: The demographics of oncology residents has changed since 2010 with the increase in the size of promotions. The evolution of the residents' aspirations towards research and their future exercise in parallel with these demographic changes has not been assessed., Methods: A questionnaire was developed by a working group from GERCOR (cooperative group in oncology), involving clinicians, researchers, GERCOR members, and residents. It consisted of 62 questions divided into 7 sections: demographics, medical thesis, post-residency, mobility, publication activity, basic research, and clinical/translational research. The national survey was published online by the Association d'enseignement et de recherche des internes en oncologie (AERIO)., Results: In total, 143 residents participated, of which 116 (81.1%) completed the questionnaire entirely. The population was representative of the current demographics, with a majority of women (65.0%), a median age of 28 years, and 39.7% of residents from Paris region. The unsupervised analysis revealed four profiles of residents, including one group strongly committed to research (16.8%), one group with moderate involvement (41.3%) and one group that did not seem interested in research (14.7%). Uncertainty about future position and lack of time and interaction with researchers appeared to be the main barriers to involvement of residents in research., Discussion: This national survey provided useful information about the residents' perspective to academic research. It may serve as a basis for proposing measures adapted to their expectations., (Copyright © 2019 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial neoplasms, with a poor prognosis. Advanced BTC remains a challenging, non-curable disease. Gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy is the standard of care as first-line (L1) therapy in this setting. Beyond failure of L1, available evidence to guide therapeutic decisions is scarce. Data from phase III studies are lacking and there is no validated strategy to date. In this review, we provide an overview of the systemic therapeutic options that can be proposed and unsolved questions in the management of patients with advanced BTC in the second-line (L2) setting. Criteria to select which patients should receive L2 therapy are ill defined and reliable prognostic tools and models to help estimate individual patient survival at the beginning of L2 are needed. Chemotherapy, mainly fluoropyrimidine-based yields modest survival results. There is insufficient evidence level to recommend a specific L2 chemotherapy regimen, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and antiangiogenic agents failed to demonstrate any survival improvement in a non-selected patient population. In recent years, knowledge about BTC molecular heterogeneity has considerably increased with the advent of high-throughput genomic and transcriptomic analyses, opening new avenues for targeted therapies. Patients with BTC may be particularly good candidates for biomarker-driven therapy in clinical practice. Among the ongoing developments, targeting of FGFR and IDH mutations and immune therapies hold many promises for the next future. In future L2 clinical trials, patients should be carefully characterized and stratified according to prognostic factors, disease subtype, and genetic drivers., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: A Vienot has no conflicts of interest to declare; C Neuzillet is the PI of a clinical trial funded by AstraZeneca., (2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Background: The benefit of second-line chemotherapy (L2) over standard first-line (L1) gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) or oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) is unclear. Our aim was to identify and validate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with L2 in aBTC to guide clinical decisions in this setting., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of four prospective patient cohorts: a development cohort (28 French centres) and three validation cohorts from Italy, UK and France. All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving L2 after GEMCIS/GEMOX L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. The association of clinicobiological data with OS was investigated in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. A simple score was derived from the multivariate model., Results: The development cohort included 405 patients treated with L1 GEMOX (91%) or GEMCIS. Of them, 55.3% were men, and median age was 64.8 years. Prior surgical resection was observed in 26.7%, and 94.8% had metastatic disease. Performance status (PS) was 0, 1 and 2 in 17.8%, 52.4% and 29.7%, respectively. Among 22 clinical parameters, eight were associated with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, four were independent prognostic factors (p < 0.05): PS, reason for L1 discontinuation, prior resection of primary tumour and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The model had the Harrell's concordance index of 0.655, a good calibration and was validated in the three external cohorts (N = 392)., Conclusion: We validated previously reported predictive factors of OS with L2 and identified peritoneal carcinomatosis as a new pejorative factor in nearly 800 patients. Our model and score may be useful in daily practice and for future clinical trial design., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Body composition has gained increasing attention in oncology in recent years due to fact that sarcopenia has been revealed to be a strong prognostic indicator for survival across multiple stages and cancer types and a predictive factor for toxicity and surgery complications. Accumulating evidence over the last decade has unraveled the "pharmacology" of sarcopenia. Lean body mass may be more relevant to define drug dosing than the "classical" body surface area or flat-fixed dosing in patients with cancer. Since sarcopenia has a major impact on patient survival and quality of life, therapeutic interventions aiming at reducing muscle loss have been developed and are being prospectively evaluated in randomized controlled trials. It is now acknowledged that this supportive care dimension of oncological management is essential to ensure the success of any anticancer treatment. The field of sarcopenia and body composition in cancer is developing quickly, with (i) the newly identified concept of sarcopenic obesity defined as a specific pathophysiological entity, (ii) unsolved issues regarding the best evaluation modalities and cut-off for definition of sarcopenia on imaging, (iii) first results from clinical trials evaluating physical activity, and (iv) emerging body-composition-tailored drug administration schemes. In this context, we propose a comprehensive review providing a panoramic approach of the clinical, pharmacological and therapeutic implications of sarcopenia and body composition in oncology., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Palliative and supportive care holds a major place in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management. It aims to prevent and reduce symptoms and hospital admissions, while ensuring optimal health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been reported to be correlated with overall survival in PDAC. Best supportive care includes non-specific treatment of pain, anxiety and depression, chemotherapy-related toxicities, as well as thromboembolic disease treatment and prevention in high-risk patients. Moreover, nutrition and physical activity interventions are receiving increasing attention as they are crucial to optimize treatment tolerance and efficacy. Of note, they require adaptation to the specificities of PDAC setting and stage of the disease. In this review, we propose an overview of palliative and supportive care interventions in PDAC, with a highlight on nutritional and physical activity management., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Prognosis and oncologic treatment feasibility in solid organ transplant patients with de novo cancer remain poorly described. We investigated the impact of immunosuppressive therapy modifications after de novo cancer diagnosis on oncologic treatment feasibility, toxicities, and prognosis. Patients with de novo cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) were selected from a monocentric cohort of 4,637 kidney and liver allograft recipients. We assessed oncologic treatment optimality according to guidelines and analyzed immunosuppressive drug modifications and oncologic treatment impacts on treatment feasibility, toxicities, and graft/patient survivals. A total of 180 patients with 205 cancers were included: mean age 60 years, median delay from transplantation to first de novo cancer 5 years. In 46% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after cancer diagnosis: 24% dose reduction and 22% mTOR inhibitor introduction. Optimal oncologic treatment was performed in 80% and 38% of patients with localized and advanced cancer respectively. Transplantation and immunosuppression hindered optimal oncologic treatment in 11% instances. Immunosuppressive therapy modifications did not affect oncologic treatment tolerance nor graft survival. In multivariate analysis, optimal oncologic treatment and mTOR inhibitor introduction improved survival of patients with de novo carcinoma. Optimal oncologic treatment is feasible in kidney and liver allograft recipients without safety concerns. Optimal oncologic treatment and mTOR inhibitor introduction seem to markedly improve survival of patients with de novo carcinoma., (© 2018 UICC.)

Introduction: Combination of cisplatine and Gemcitabine (CisGem) is the reference 1st line Chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary cancer. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated an overall survival superiority when compared to gemcitabine in 1st line for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Because of similarities between pancreatic and biliary cancers, we proposed a randomized trial comparing mFOLFIRINOX and CisGEm., Aim: PRODIGE38-AMEBICA is a phase II/III trial evaluating efficacy of modifed FOLFIRINOX (D1 bolus removed) or CisGEm on patients with locally advanced non resectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer., Patients and Methods: Main inclusion criteria are histologically or cytologically proven biliary tract tumor (intra or extra hepatic or hilar or gallbladder carcinoma), measurable disease (metastases and/or primary tumor), Bilirubin <1,5 N and transaminases <5 N. The randomization (ratio 1:1) will be stratified on center, stage of the disease, tumor localization and previous adjuvant treatment. The Phase II trial has an objective of 73% patients alive and without progression at 6 months for Folfirinox (versus 59% for Gemcis). 128 additional patients should be added in the phase III trial with an objective of overall survival improvement of 4 months in favor of mFOLFIRINOX., Conclusion: The study is opened in France (EudraCT no.: 2015-002282-35). All the patients (188) of the phase II part are currently randomized., (Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA), updated in July 2018., Design: This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of PA. It is based on the previous guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations were graded in three categories, according to the level of evidence., Results: Over the last seven years, significant changes in PA management have been implemented in clinical practice. Imaging/staging: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging is useful before surgery to rule out small liver metastases., Surgery: centralization of pancreatic surgery in expert centers is associated with a decreased postoperative mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX in fit patients, or gemcitabine, or 5-FU, or gemcitabine plus capecitabine, to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. Locally advanced PA: no survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy. Metastatic PA: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel combination are first-line standards in fit patients; second-line with 5FU/nal-IRI or 5FU/oxaliplatin combination after first-line gemcitabine., Conclusion: Guidelines for management of PA are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated. This constant progress is made possible through clinical and translational research. However, as each individual case is particular, they cannot substitute to multidisciplinary tumor board discussion., (Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the digestive cancer with the poorest prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 7%. Complete surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the only treatment with curative intent. However, many patients with an apparently localized disease who may undergo primary tumor resection already have micro-metastatic disease and will promptly develop metastases. Considering the significant rate of morbidity and mortality upon pancreatic surgery, the pre-operative identification of patients with an aggressive disease is therefore a major clinical issue. Although tumor size, differentiation, margins, and lymph node invasion are the main "classical" prognostic factors, they are not sufficient to fully predict early disease recurrence. In the last decade, multi-omics high-throughput analyses have provided a new insight into PDAC biology and have led to the description of multiple molecular subtypes, with a significant prognostic value for most of them, but that have not yet been transposed to routine clinical practice, mainly due to poor availability of tumor tissue material prior to surgical resection. In this review, we provide an overview of the current status of clinico-pathological and molecular biomarkers (tumor and blood) to predict early recurrence, and their implications for clinical practice and future research development., (Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)