Search

Introduction: Haemodiafiltration (HDF) with high reinfusion volumes is the most effective technique for clearing uraemic toxins. There are various modalities depending on the location where the replacement volume is administered in the extracorporeal circuit: pre-dilution, mixed or mid-dilution and post-dilution, in which the infusion is carried out pre-dilution, pre- and post-dilution simultaneously and post-dilution, respectively., Objective: Compare the clearance of small, medium-sized and protein-bound molecules and the convective volume administered in online HDF (OL-HDF) in post-dilution and mixed (pre-post-dilution) infusion., Material and Method: A prospective, randomised, crossover study comparing post-dilution and mixed OL-HDF. Patients (n=8) were randomly assigned to receive 6 sessions in each technique. We conducted 89 sessions, of which 68 were at a scheduled time (ST) and 21 at an effective time (ET). We determined the reduction rate (RR) percentages for various substances and the infusion volumes. The RR study was performed using ET., Results: The KT value obtained was greater with post-dilution OL-HDF [68 (8.1) compared to 64.9 (8.8) litres] (P=.009) when patients were dialysed at ST. This difference disappeared when dialysis was performed at ET. The difference between ST and ET was greater in mixed HDF than in post-dilution HDF [10.3 (7.4) compared to 6.5 (3.1) minutes, P=.02]. We found no differences in the RR of the substances analysed., Conclusion: Mixed OL-HDF is not inferior to post-dilution OL-HDF either in the clearance of small and medium-sized molecules or in the clearance of protein-bound molecules at the same ET.

Introduction: 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH-vit D) levels in the blood are associated with multiple pathologies. "Normal" values have been defined based on cardiovascular risk, and under this framework, patients with chronic kidney disease often have a deficit. 25-OH-vit D replacement in patients on haemodialysis (HD), in which dosage has not yet been clearly established, is becoming a constant in our daily practice., Objective: To assess whether dialysis technique influences the baseline concentration of 25-OH-vitamin D and the response to supplements., Method: Prospective observational study of two cohorts of patients, those patients treated with calcifediol and those untreated (controls). Blood levels of Ca, P, PTH, and 25-OH-vit D were measured in 59 prevalent patients on HD (35 male; mean age: 65.2 (15.7) years) in November 2010. Thirty-six patients with 25-OH-vit D<10 ng/ml were treated with weekly calcifediol (Hidroferol®, 1 ampoule: 266 μg) since January 2011, which was administered after HD by a nurse. They received 6 doses, and blood levels were measured again in March 2011. We compared the response based on the technique of HD (online haemodiafiltration [OL-HDF] vs HD)., Results: Mean baseline values (n=59): 25-OH-vit D: 9.8 (7.0)ng/ml, Ca: 9.3 (0.5)mg/dl, P: 4.5 (1.4)mg/dl, and iPTH: 299 (224)pg/ml. There were no differences by age, sex, or dialysis technique (HD vs OL-HDF). Treated patients (n=36): 25-OH-vit D levels rose from 6.2 (3.4)ng/ml to 51 (22.9)ng/ml (P<.0001), without significant changes in Ca. Serum phosphate increased an average of 0.6 (1.4)mg/dl, from 4.4 mg/dl to 5mg/dl, (P=.015). PTH decreased an average of 85 (208)pg/ml (P=.023). In these patients, the indication for phosphate binders increased by an average dose equivalent of 0.47 (0.82)mg/dl (P<.001). The 13 patients under treatment with OL-HDF reached 25-OH-vit D levels significantly higher than the 23 treated on HD: 63 (21)ng/ml vs 43 (21)ng/ml (P=.011). Dual treatment with native and active Vit D was associated with significantly increased levels of P (P=.043). Untreated patients (n=23): 25-OH-vit D levels decreased from 15.3 (7.5)ng/ml in November to 11.1 (6.8)ng/ml in March (P<.01), without significant changes in P or PTH and without differences according to age. 25-OH-vit D levels declined in patients on HD (15) but not in patients on OL-HDF., Conclusion: The patients on haemodialysis have low or very low baseline values for 25-OH-vit D. The response to treatment with calcifediol is good, with the most marked improvement occurring in patients on OL-HDF. Furthermore, 25-OH-vit D levels decreased in untreated patients, which was probably correlated with the lower sun exposure in winter. Some patients experienced an increase in phosphataemia despite increasing the dosage of phosphate binders, mainly in those receiving treatment with active vitamin D.