Search

Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often reach complete remission, but relapse rates remain high. Next-generation sequencing enables the detection of molecular minimal residual disease in virtually every patient, but its clinical value for the prediction of relapse has yet to be established.Methods: We conducted a study involving patients 18 to 65 years of age who had newly diagnosed AML. Targeted next-generation sequencing was carried out at diagnosis and after induction therapy (during complete remission). End points were 4-year rates of relapse, relapse-free survival, and overall survival.Results: At least one mutation was detected in 430 out of 482 patients (89.2%). Mutations persisted in 51.4% of those patients during complete remission and were present at various allele frequencies (range, 0.02 to 47%). The detection of persistent DTA mutations (i.e., mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1), which are often present in persons with age-related clonal hematopoiesis, was not correlated with an increased relapse rate. After the exclusion of persistent DTA mutations, the detection of molecular minimal residual disease was associated with a significantly higher relapse rate than no detection (55.4% vs. 31.9%; hazard ratio, 2.14; P<0.001), as well as with lower rates of relapse-free survival (36.6% vs. 58.1%; hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.92; P<0.001) and overall survival (41.9% vs. 66.1%; hazard ratio for death, 2.06; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the persistence of non-DTA mutations during complete remission conferred significant independent prognostic value with respect to the rates of relapse (hazard ratio, 1.89; P<0.001), relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.64; P=0.001), and overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.64; P=0.003). A comparison of sequencing with flow cytometry for the detection of residual disease showed that sequencing had significant additive prognostic value.Conclusions: Among patients with AML, the detection of molecular minimal residual disease during complete remission had significant independent prognostic value with respect to relapse and survival rates, but the detection of persistent mutations that are associated with clonal hematopoiesis did not have such prognostic value within a 4-year time frame. (Funded by the Queen Wilhelmina Fund Foundation of the Dutch Cancer Society and others.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group., Methods: This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance., Results and Conclusion: The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic., Competing Interests: DIsclosure CB reports honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Janssen, BeiGene, Novartis, Pfizer, Incyte, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Celltrion, MorphoSys, Regeneron; he reports consulting or advisory role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, Pfizer, BeiGene, Celltrion, AbbVie, Incyte, Regeneron, MorphoSys, Novartis; he reports speaker’s engagement: Roche, Janssen, BeiGene, Celltrion, AbbVie, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences; he reports research funding: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Celltrion, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Pfizer, Amgen. MD reports honoraria as Advisory Board Member of AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, MorphoSys, Novartis, Roche; he reports honoraria for speaker’s engagement from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Roche; he reports institutional research grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Gilead, Celgene, Janssen, Roche. AA-L has declared no conflicts of interest. JA reports personal financial interests as advisory board and invited speaker from Incyte, advisory board from Mallinckrodt, advisory board and invited speaker from Novartis, advisory board and invited speaker from Pfizer; she reports non-financial interests as principal investigator from Incyte, principal investigator from Novartis. LA received advisory honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Verastem, Eusa Pharma, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics and Gilead; research support from Gilead, and travel expenses from Roche, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, and Eusa Pharma; speakers bureau from Novartis. CB has declared no conflicts of interest. LB reports Advisory Committee activities for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics and has research support from Bayer and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. PC has declared no conflicts of interest. MGDP has declared no conflicts of interest. MD reports personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from BeiGene, personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work. SD reports personal financial interests as advisory board, invited speaker, fellow funding, and coordinating PI from BeiGene, writing engagement from Karger, advisory board and coordinating PI from Sanofi, funding, and other from Janssen; she reports non-financial interests as advisory role at British Society for Haematology Lymphoma Special Interest Group, advisory role at Lymphoma Action, member of board of directors at WMUK Charity. HTE has declared no conflicts of interest. RF reports honoraria for advisory boards and/or speaker bureau from Janssen, Gilead, AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Incyte, Pfizer, all outside the submitted work. PG reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Acerta/AstraZeneca, personal fees from BeiGene, personal fees from Celgene/Juno/BMS, grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Lilly/Loxo, personal fees from MEI, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from ArQule/MSD, outside the submitted work; MGdS reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Gilead Sciences, grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees, non-financial support, and other from Janssen Cilag, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, non-financial support from AbbVie, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees and non-financial support from Takeda, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from ADC Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. JG reports personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from BMS/Celgene, grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Kite/Gilead, personal fees from MorphoSys, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from TG Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. RH has had a consultant or advisory relationship with Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Takeda; has received honoraria from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, PharmaMar, and Takeda; has received research funding from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. CH reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Sierra Oncology, personal fees from CTI pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Jannsen, personal fees from Geron, grants and personal fees from AOP Orphan Pharma, personal fees from Galecto, grants, personal fees and other from Constellation, outside the submitted work. MH reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Bayer Pharma AG, personal fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Tolremo, outside the submitted work. BK has received honoraria for lectures from Ipsen, Novartis and MSD (all outside of the submitted work). J-JK reports consulting fees and honoraria from Novartis, consulting fees from AbbVie, honoraria from AOP Orphan Pharma, participation on a monitoring board or advisory board from BMS/Celgene, participation on a monitoring board or advisory board from Incyte. NK reports grants and honoraria from Neovii, honoraria from Sanofi, grants and honoraria from Jazz, grants and honoraria from Celgene, grants and honoraria from Riemser, honoraria from Gilead/Kite, honorarium from AOP Oprhan Pharma, grants and honorarium from Novartis, honorarium from Amgen. PM reports personal fees from Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, AbbVie, Sanofi, outside the submitted work. JP has declared no conflicts of interest. FP has declared no conflicts of interest. DR received honoraria from Incyte, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer; clinical trial steering committee membership: Novartis; membership on advisory boards: Incyte, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer. J-MR reports grants and honoraria from Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Takeda, Incyte, and Servier. TR has declared no conflicts of interest. JF-M reports consulting and advisory boards honoraria (received by CUN ) from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Regeneron, Roche, outside the submitted work. VS has declared no conflicts of interest. GFS reports personal fees and other from AbbVie, other from Amgen, other from Astellas, other from Boehringer-Ingelheim, grants, personal fees and other from Celgene, other from Helsinn Healthcare, grants, personal fees, and other from Janssen-Cilag, grants and other from Novartis, other from Onconova, grants, personal fees and other from Roche, and other from Takeda, outside the submitted work. PS reports honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm, SkylineDx, Takeda, and research support from Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, BMS, SkylineDx, Karyopharm, all outside the submitted work. MvL-T has received travel grants and honoraria from Celgene, Gilead, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, BMS, Medac, Oncopeptides, Merck, CDDF, Pfizer, Medac, Thermo Fisher, AstraZeneca; is a consultant for Celgene, Gilead, Oncopeptides, MSD, 4D Pharma, Janssen, Shionogi and received research funding from BMBF, Deutsche Jose Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung, IZKF Jena, Novartis, Gilead, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Celgene, Oncopeptides, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). CW has declared no conflicts of interest. GP reports grants from Amgen, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants from Lilly, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. FP reports grants from Novartis, Celgene, BMS, Abbvie, Karyopharma, Janssen., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effect of palliative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in NSCLC patients. However, little is known about the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients whose tumors are refractory to first-line chemotherapy. We investigated the outcome of all consecutive and unselected patients receiving palliative chemotherapy in a single institution to assess the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in primary refractory NSCLC., Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC diagnosed between 1990 and 2016 were assessed. Outcome parameters were collected and patients were characterized as either having primary progressive disease or clinical benefit [CB; defined as complete/partial remission (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD)]. Probabilities of survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The log-rank test was used for comparing groups. Cox models were used to explore the prognostic value of covariables., Results: The analysis included 576 patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.47-10.47]; 62.7% of patients were treated with a platinum-based first-line therapy. Two hundred twenty-two patients (38.5%) were primary refractory to first-line therapy. Median OS was significantly shorter for those patients [7.4 versus 11.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.61 (95% CI 1.34-1.93), P < 0.0001]. Poorer initial performance status was significantly associated with primary refractory disease (P = 0.015). Eighty-one (36.5%) primary refractory patients received a second-line therapy. Median OS was significantly longer for refractory patients receiving second-line therapy versus best supportive care [10.1 versus 5.0 months, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.40-0.72), P < 0.0001]., Conclusions: Nearly 40% of patients are primary refractory to palliative first-line therapy and have a poor prognosis. Active second-line therapy can significantly improve the outcome. Therefore, patients with primary refractory NSCLC should be offered further active therapy. These real-life data for primary refractory patients form the basis for further research in sequencing of current palliative treatment options., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

After autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the first complete remission (CR1), patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may relapse and undergo allogeneic HCT in the second complete remission (CR2). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of allogeneic HCT performed in CR2 comparing patients with prior consolidation by autologous HCT versus patients with chemotherapy consolidation. Included were 2619 adults with allogeneic HCT in CR2 from 2000 to 2017 with (n = 417) or without (n = 2202) prior autologous HCT. Patient groups were not entirely comparable; patients with prior autologous HCT were younger, had less often a favorable cytogenetic profile, had more commonly donors other than matched siblings, and more often received reduced-intensity conditioning. In multivariate analysis, nonrelapse mortality risks in patients with prior autologous HCT were 1.34 (1.07 to 1.67; P = .01) after adjustment for age, cytogenetic risk, transplant year, donor, conditioning intensity, sex matching, interval diagnosis-relapse, and relapse-allogeneic HCT as compared with chemotherapy consolidation. Similarly, risks of events in leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease, relapse-free survival were higher with prior autologous HCT, 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35), P = .03 and 1.18 (1.03 to 1.35), P = .02, respectively. Risk of death was also higher, 1.13 (0.97 to 1.32), P = .1, but this was not significant. Postremission consolidation with autologous HCT for AML in CR1 increases toxicity of subsequent allogeneic HCT in CR2., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neurological complications of monoclonal gammopathy, or dysglobulinemia, are typically affecting the peripheral nerve. The clinical course is often chronic and progressive and requires a precise diagnosis of the type of plasma cell disorder associated with the neuropathy, to investigate other organs manifestations and to assess the presence of specific markers. These steps are required to initiate an appropriate therapy that may include chemotherapy, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment.

In contrast to solid organ transplantation, ABO incompatibility is generally not associated with survival differences in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, patients receiving ABO-incompatible stem cell transplantation can be analyzed to study the mechanism of tolerance induction after antigen-mismatched transplantation. The goal of this study was to analyze the levels of anti-A/B antibodies after ABO-incompatible transplantation. Host-derived antidonor antibodies disappeared rapidly after transplantation and did not reappear in the further posttransplant course. Donor-derived antihost antibodies did not significantly increase and compatible anti-A/B antibodies remained positive after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Thus, there is no evidence for stimulation of donor B lymphocytes to produce antirecipient antibodies suggesting a potential B cell tolerance.

Aside from causing hemolytic reactions the ABO blood group system does not have an impact on outcome after allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, only a few studies have addressed the effect of ABO incompatibility on the incidence of GVHD, time to engraftment, relapse and survival. Therefore, we performed a retrospective two-center analysis of 562 consecutive patients receiving allogeneic SCT, including 361 ABO-identical, 98 minor, 86 major and 17 bidirectional ABO-incompatible SCT. In multivariate analysis adjusted for potential confounders survival was significantly associated with ABO incompatibility (P = 0.006). Compared to ABO-identical SCT, bidirectional ABO incompatibility increased the risk significantly (RR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.1; P = 0.0009), whereas survival of patients with minor (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.7; P = 0.27), or major ABO-incompatible SCT (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8; P= 0.18) was not significantly different. RBC engraftment was delayed in major ABO-incompatible SCT (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.85; P = 0.001). The incidence of acute GVHD (grade I-IV) was higher in minor ABO-incompatible SCT as compared to ABO identity (RR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-5.9, P = 0.009). This difference was limited to mild GVHD; in moderate-to-severe GVHD (grade II-IV) no significant difference was found among the groups (P = 0.53). The relapse rate was not influenced by ABO incompatibility (P = 0.78). In conclusion, these results suggest that ABO incompatibility represents a risk factor not only for post-transplant hemolysis, but also for survival and the rate of mild GVHD after allogeneic SCT.

Objectives: To examine incidence and outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with haematological malignancy and analyse prognostic factors associated with outcome., Design: Retrospective cohort study in an intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center., Patients: 78 patients with severe haematological malignancy were admitted 97 times between 1990-97 to the medical ICU for septic shock (18), respiratory failure (30), postoperative monitoring (19), cardiovascular (10) and central nervous complications (8) or for other reasons (12). Median age was 43 (4-73) years, average duration of ICU stay was 4 (1-43) days. Forty-two patients required mechanical ventilation, 46 vasopressors and 8 haemodialysis., Results: Rates of ICU admission differed by treatment of the underlying disease. There were 18, 10 and 27 ICU admissions per 100 treatments in patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute leukaemia, autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (p <0.005) respectively. Thirty-two of 78 patients died within 60 days of ICU admission. Organ failure, i.e. cardiovascular failure requiring vasopressors, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and renal failure, requiring haemodialysis, was most significantly associated with outcome. Mortality by day 60 after admission was 16%, 36%, 64%, and 83% (p <0.0002) for patients without organ failure, and for patients with 1, 2 or 3 failing organs. In a multivariate logistical regression model, only the organ failure score (p <0.0005) and evidence of liver damage, defined as ASAT or ALAT >100 IU/ L (p <0.007), but not age, sex, primary disease and treatment of the underlying disease predicted outcome., Conclusion: Multi-organ failure and evidence of liver damage but no other patient, disease, or treatment related factor predict outcome in patients with haematological disease admitted to the ICU.

Introduction: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis carries a high mortality in neutropenic patients. Descriptive reports have shown early surgery to be feasible with acceptably low morbidity. The possible benefit of surgery has not been investigated in comparative studies., Materials and Methods: In a retrospective cohort study encompassing a 15-year period, 54 (8%) of 697 consecutive patients with severe hematological disease required treatment for localized invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Patients treated by antifungal drugs (medical group, n = 24) were compared to patients treated with additional early lung resection (surgical group, n = 30). Outcomes analysed were fungal progression and survival., Results: Fungal progression at six months was 17% (95% CI 3-31) in the surgical group and 52% (95% CI 34-73) in the medical group (P = 0.005). Survival at six months was 70% (95% CI 53-87) in surgically and 42% (95% CI 24-62) in medically treated patients (P = 0.009). Adjusting for differences in WHO performance score (worse in the medical group) and duration of neutropenia (longer in the surgical group) in a multivariate analysis, a difference in relative risk of death (0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.88; P = 0.03) remained in favor of surgery., Conclusion: In this retrospective study surgical intervention to treat invasive pulmonary fungal disease appeared to have a beneficial effect on the impact of disease control and survival. Differences in baseline characteristics of the two patient groups calls for cautious interpretation. A prospective randomized trial seems warranted.

T-cell depletion of donor marrow decreases graft-versus-host disease resulting from transplants from unrelated and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched related donors. However, there are diverse strategies for T-cell-depleted transplantation, and it is uncertain whether any improve leukemia-free survival (LFS). To compare strategies for T-cell-depleted alternative donor transplants and to compare T-cell depleted with non-T-cell-depleted transplants, we studied 870 patients with leukemia who received T-cell-depleted transplants from unrelated or HLA-mismatched related donors from 1982 to 1994. Outcomes were compared with those of 998 non-T-cell-depleted transplants. We compared LFS using different strategies for T-cell-depleted transplantation considering T-cell depletion technique, intensity of pretransplant conditioning, and posttransplant immune suppression using proportional hazards regression to adjust for other prognostic variables. Five categories of T-cell depletion techniques were considered: narrow-specificity antibodies, broad-specificity antibodies, Campath antibodies, elutriation, and lectins. Strategies resulting in similar LFS were pooled to compare T-cell-depleted with non-T-cell-depleted transplants. Recipients of transplants T-cell depleted by narrow-specificity antibodies had lower treatment failure risk (higher LFS) than recipients of transplants T-cell depleted by other techniques. Compared with non-T-cell-depleted transplants (5-year probability +/- 95% confidence interval [CI] of LFS, 31% +/- 4%), 5-year LFS was 29% +/- 5% (P = NS) after transplants T-cell depleted by narrow-specificity antibodies and 16% +/- 4% (P <.0001) after transplants T-cell depleted by other techniques. After alternative donor transplantation, T-cell depletion of donor marrow by narrow-specificity antibodies resulted in LFS rates that were higher than those for transplants T-cell depleted using other techniques but similar to those for non-T-cell-depleted transplants. (Blood. 2000;95:3996-4003)

The predictive value of daily C-reactive protein (CRP) monitoring to distinguish causes of fever in neutropenic patients was studied retrospectively. A total of 143 fever episodes during 113 consecutive hospitalizations were studied in 71 patients who had been referred for chemotherapy or haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There were, on average, 1.3 fever episodes per hospital stay, attributed to: infection (55, 27 invasive bacterial, 5 fungal, 3 viral and 20 probable infections); acute graft vs host disease (GvHD) (20); drugs (22); transfusions (7); and not attributable (39). 130 (91%) fever episodes were accompanied by a rise in CRP, 6 (4%) episodes were fatal. Maximal CRP levels (CRPmax) and maximal temperature (Tmax) were higher in invasive bacterial infections than in aGvHD and higher in aGvHD than in drug- or transfusion-related fever (p < 0.0001). Temperature and CRP rose in parallel. A total of 16 patients developed grade II-IV aGvHD by day 11 (9-21) (median, range) after allogeneic HSCT. Acute GvHD was preceded by fever for 3 d (1-7), and by CRP increase for 5 d (0-15) (p < 0.0001). CRP monitoring may be useful to distinguish between causes of fever. Very high CRP levels tend to be associated with invasive bacterial infections. CRP is not an early warning sign. An increase in CRP and fever may precede other clinical manifestations of aGvHD.

Purpose: Immune dysregulation associated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is linked to an increased risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD); however, reports of Hodgkin's disease (HD) after transplantation are rare., Patients and Methods: We evaluated the risk of HD among 18,531 persons receiving allogeneic BMT between 1964 and 1992 at 235 centers. The number of HD cases was compared with that expected in the general population. Risk factors were identified using Poisson regression and a nested case-control study., Results: Risk of HD was increased in the postBMT population compared with the general population with an observed-to-expected incidence ratio (O/E) of 6.2 (observed cases, n = 8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7 to 12). A significantly increased risk of HD remained after excluding two human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients (observed cases, n = 6; O/E = 4.7, 95% CI, 1.7 to 10.3). Mixed cellularity subtype predominated (five of eight cases, 63%). Five of six assessable cases contained Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome. Posttransplant HD differed from PTLD by later onset (> 2.5 years) and lack of association with established risk factors (such as T-cell depletion and HLA disparity). Patients with HD were more likely than matched controls to have had grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), required therapy for chronic GVHD, or both (P =.002), although analysis included small numbers of patients., Conclusion: The increased incidence of HD among BMT recipients adds support to current theories which link overstimulation of cell-mediated immunity and exposure to EBV with various subtypes of HD. The long latency of HD after transplant and lack of association with risk factors for PTLD is noteworthy and should be explored further for possible insights into pathogenesis.

Background and Methods: It is uncertain whether mortality rates among patients who have undergone bone marrow transplantation return to the level of the mortality rates of the general population. We analyzed the characteristics of 6691 patients listed in the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. All the patients were free of their original disease two years after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Mortality rates in this cohort were compared with those of an age-, sex-, and nationality-matched general population. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to identify risk factors for death more than two years after transplantation (late death)., Results: Among patients who were free of disease two years after transplantation, the probability of living for five more years was 89 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88 to 90 percent). Among patients who underwent transplantation for aplastic anemia, the risk of death by the sixth year after transplantation did not differ significantly from that of a normal population. Mortality remained significantly higher than normal throughout the study among patients who underwent transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia and through the ninth year among those who underwent transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Recurrent leukemia was the chief cause of death among patients who received a transplant for leukemia, whereas chronic graft-versus-host disease was the chief cause among those who received a transplant for aplastic anemia. Advanced, long-standing disease before transplantation and active chronic graft-versus-host disease were important risk factors for late death., Conclusions: In patients who receive an allogeneic bone marrow transplant as treatment for acute myelogenous or lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, or aplastic anemia and who are free of their original disease two years later, the disease is probably cured. However, for many years after transplantation, the mortality among these patients is higher than that in a normal population.

Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare clonal haematological disorder characterized by intravascular haemolysis and increased risk of thrombosis. PNH is associated with bone marrow failure syndromes including aplastic anaemia, myelodysplasia and leukaemia. Bone marrow transplants are sometimes used to treat PNH, but small series and reporting biases make assessment of transplant outcome difficult. The outcome of 57 consecutive allogeneic bone marrow transplants for PNH reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) between 1978 and 1995 was analysed. The 2-year probability of survival in 48 recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants was 56% (95% confidence interval 49-63%). Two recipients of identical twin transplants remain alive 8 and 12 years after treatment. One of seven recipients of alternative donor allogeneic transplants is alive 5 years after transplant. The most common causes of treatment failure were graft failure and infections. Our results indicate that bone marrow transplantation can restore normal bone marrow function in about 50% of PNH patients.

Various isolation strategies are used to prevent infections during bone marrow transplantation; data on their efficacy are lacking. We studied whether use of high efficiency particulate air filtration (HEPA) and/or laminar airflow (LAF) units affect transplant-related mortality (TRM) or survival in the first year after allogeneic transplantation. 5065 patients with leukemia receiving bone marrow transplants from an HLA identical sibling (n = 3982) or alternative related or unrelated donors (n = 1083) between 1988 and 1992 were reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry by 222 teams. Two types of isolation were considered: (1) conventional protective isolation with single patient room and any combination of hand-washing, gloves, mask and gown; and (2) HEPA and/or LAF. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the relative risks (RRs) of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and of deaths from any cause in patients treated in HEPA/LAF units compared to patients treated in conventional isolation. HLA-identical sibling and alternative donor transplants were analyzed separately. Risks of TRM and overall mortality in the first 100 days post-transplant were significantly lower among patients treated in HEPA/LAF units than in those treated conventionally. RRs of TRM were 0.76 (P = 0.009) for recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants and 0.65 (P = 0.003) for recipients of alternative donor transplants. Correspondingly RRs of overall mortality were 0.80 (P = 0.02) and 0.65 (P = 0.0006). Decreased risks of TRM and of death in the first 100 days post-transplant resulted in significantly higher 1-year survival rates in patients treated in HEPA/LAF rather than in conventional isolation units. Use of HEPA and/or LAF to prevent infections decreases TRM and increases survival after allogeneic bone marrow transplants for leukemia.

Hydroxyurea, interferon, and HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation are common therapies for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. Which is best is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare survival of patients with CML receiving HLA-identical sibling transplants versus hydroxyurea or interferon. The transplant cohort included 548 recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants, reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. The nontransplant cohort included 196 patients receiving hydroxyurea (n = 121) or interferon (n = 75) on a randomized trial of the German CML Study Group. Survivals were compared using proportional hazards regression with fixed and time-dependent variables to adjust for patient differences and changing risks over time. For the first 18 months after diagnosis, mortality was higher in the transplant than the nontransplant cohort (relative risk [RR], 5.85; P < .0001). From 18 to 56 months, mortality was similar (RR, 0.80; P = .38). After 56 months, mortality was lower in the transplant cohort (RR, 0.16; P < .0001). Seven-year survival probabilities (95% confidence interval) were 58% (50% to 66%) with transplant and 32% (22% to 41%) with hydroxyurea or interferon. There was a significant survival advantage for hydroxyurea or interferon in the first 4 years after diagnosis and for transplants starting 5.5 years after diagnosis. For transplants done within 1 year of diagnosis, the survival advantage for transplantation began earlier. Survival advantage for transplants was greater and occurred earlier in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prognostic features than in those with low-risk features. This study confirms higher early mortality, but a long-term survival advantage for HLA-identical sibling transplants over hydroxyurea or interferon in CML.

HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation is an effective and commonly used therapy for young patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Efficacy results from high dose chemotherapy, with or without radiation, given for pretransplant conditioning and from immune-mediated antileukemia effects of the graft. The primary determinant of outcome is the patient's disease phase at time of transplant, with best results observed when transplants are done early in the chronic phase. Major causes of treatment failure are graft-versus-host disease and other transplant-related complications. Relatively few patients relapse unless the disease is advanced pretransplant or the donor bone marrow is T-cell depleted.

Bone marrow transplants for severe aplastic anemia were first performed in the 1970s. Transplant regimens, supportive care, and patient selection have changed substantially since then. Our objective was to determine the impact of these changes on transplant outcome. We studied 1,305 recipients of HLA-identical sibling transplants for aplastic anemia between 1976 and 1992, reported to the IBMTR by 179 centers. We compared survival of transplants performed in three intervals (1976 through 1980 [n = 186], 1981 through 1987 [n = 648], and 1988 through 1992 [n = 471]) using Cox proportional hazards regression. Five-year survival (+/-95% confidence interval) increased from 48% +/- 7% in the 1976-1980 cohort to 66% +/- 6% in the 1988-1992 cohort (P < .0001). Risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and interstitial pneumonia decreased over time, but the risk of graft failure did not. Higher long-term survival resulted primarily from decreased mortality in the first 3 months posttransplantation. Late mortality risks were low and changed little over the intervals studied. In multivariate analysis, changes in transplantation strategies accounted for most but not all of the improved outcome. Use of cyclosporine to prevent GVHD was the most important factor. Changes in patient selection did not seem to explain improved survival. Survival after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantations for aplastic anemia has improved since 1976. Changes in GVHD prophylaxis account for much of this improvement. Other changes may also operate.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) severity is graded by pattern of organ involvement and clinical performance status using a system introduced by Glucksberg and colleagues 21 years ago. We examined how well Glucksberg grade predicted transplant outcome and constructed a Severity Index not requiring subjective assessment of performance in 2881 adults receiving an HLA-identical sibling T-cell-depleted (n = 752) or non-T-cell-depleted (n = 2129) bone marrow transplant for leukaemia between 1986 and 1992. Relative risks (RR) of relapse, treatment-related mortality (TRM) and treatment failure (TF) (relapse or death) were calculated for patients with (Glucksberg Grade I, II or III/IV acute (GVHD) versus those without acute GVHD and for patients with distinct patterns of organ involvement regardless of Glucksberg grade. Using data for non-T-cell-depleted transplants, a Severity Index was developed grouping patients with patterns of organ involvement associated with similar risks of TRM and TF. Higher Glucksberg grade predicted poorer outcome; however, patients with the same grade but different patterns of skin, liver or gut involvement often had significantly different outcomes. The revised Severity Index groups patients in four categories, A-D. Compared to patients without acute GVHD, RRs (95% confidence interval) of TF were 0.85 (0.69, 1.05) for patients with Index A, 1.21 (1.02, 1.43) with B, 2.19 (1.78, 2.71) with C, and 5.69 (4.57, 7.08) with D. Prognostic utility of the Index was tested in patients receiving T-cell-depleted transplants; similar RRs of TF were observed. An acute GVHD Severity Index is proposed to enhance design and interpretation of clinical trials in the current era of allogeneic blood and bone marrow transplantation.

The International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR), established in 1972, collects data on recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants from over 320 institutions, worldwide. Its database includes information for about 40% of all allogeneic transplants performed between 1964 and 1995.

Allogeneic and autologous bone marrow and blood cell transplants are increasingly used treatments for cancer and disorders of bone marrow and immune function. This is largely due to use of autotransplants to treat common diseases such as breast cancer. The use of blood cells alone for autotransplants was also a significant change in the past 5 years. The IBMTR and ABMTR continue to provide a unique resource for studying outcomes and trends in allogeneic and autologous bone marrow and blood cell transplants.

Bone marrow transplants are an effective treatment for many life-threatening diseases. Considerations for use include potential for cure, availability of a suitable donor, feasibility of using autologous stem cells, and risks of transplant-related mortality. Not addressed in this article, but also important, is consideration of the relative efficacy of conventional therapy in specific settings. The IBMTR and ABMTR offer a unique resource for examining the role of allogeneic and autologous transplants in cancer treatment.