Search

The management of cancer has been traditionally dependent on the primary tumour type and specific histologic subtypes. Recently, the introduction of molecular profiling tools and its increasing use in clinical practice has facilitated the emergence of novel genomically driven treatment options within the standard of care landscape as well as in the clinical trial setting. One such aberration is mutation in v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), which results in hyperactivation of RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling in the Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway. BRAF and Mitogen-activated protein kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors, although being currently approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer, have reported activity across other various cancers harbouring BRAF aberrations. It has been proposed that combined MEK and BRAF inhibition could overcome the acquired resistance commonly developed among patients receiving BRAF or MEK inhibitors as monotherapy. We report five cases of BRAF V600E (substitution of glutamic acid for valine in codon 600) aberrant refractory metastatic cancers treated with dual BRAF/MEK combination inhibitor therapy leading to an excellent clinical and radiological response and protracted duration of disease control.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in heavily pretreated unselected patients with metastatic gastro-esophageal junction (mGOJ)/gastric cancer (GC). Attempts to select patients based on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression appear to be suboptimal. A strong rationale suggests a prognostic role for inflammatory biomarkers for ICI-treated patients with mGOJ/GC. Our objective was to assess whether inflammatory markers are associated with survival in ICI-treated patients with mGOJ/GC. Ten inflammatory markers were retrospectively analyzed at baseline in 57 patients with mGOJ/GC with unknown PD-L1 status treated with second-line ICIs and correlated with OS. Selected variables were then analyzed in a multivariate Cox-regression model and used to build a GIPI nomogram. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as continuous variables and albumin categorized as less than versus greater than 30 g/dL were the most significant predictors of OS and were used to build the GIPI nomogram. Nomogram-based lowest, mid-low, mid-high, and highest risk quartiles were associated with median OS (mOS) of 14.9, 7.1, 5.6, and 2.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] of highest vs. lowest risk 4.94; p = 0.0002). By optimally dichotomizing CRP and NLR, patients with one or more of the risk factors NLR > 6, CRP > 15 mg/L, and albumin

Background Nivolumab showed improvement in overall survival (OS) in ATTRACTION-2, the first phase 3 study in patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer treated with ≥ 2 chemotherapy regimens. The 2-year follow-up results of ATTRACTION-2 are presented herein. Methods ATTRACTION-2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (49 sites; Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The median (min–max) follow-up period was 27.3 (24.1–36.3) months. The primary endpoint was OS. A subanalysis of OS was performed based on best overall response and tumor-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression status. Results Overall, 493 of 601 screened patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (330) or placebo (163). OS (median [95% confidence interval; CI]) was significantly longer in the nivolumab group (5.26 [4.60–6.37] vs 4.14 [3.42–4.86] months in placebo group) at the 2-year follow-up (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.62 [0.51–0.76]; P

Abstract Background Brain metastases from sarcomatous lesions pose a management challenge owing to their rarity and the histopathological heterogeneity. Prognostic indices such as the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index have been developed for several primary tumour types presenting with brain metastases (e.g. lung, breast, melanoma), tailored to the specifics of different primary histologies and molecular profiles. Thus far, a prognostic index to direct treatment decisions is lacking for adult sarcoma patients with brain metastases. Methods We performed a multicentre analysis of a national group of expert sarcoma tertiary centres (French Sarcoma Group, GSF-GETO) with the participation of one Canadian and one Swiss centre. The study cohort included adult patients with a diagnosis of a bone or soft tissue sarcoma presenting parenchymal or meningeal brain metastases, managed between January 1992 and March 2012. We assessed the validity of the original GPA index in this patient population and developed a disease-specific Sarcoma-GPA index. Results The original GPA index is not prognostic for sarcoma brain metastasis patients. We have developed a dedicated Sarcoma-GPA index that identifies a sub-group of patients with particularly favourable prognosis based on histology, number of brain lesions and performance status. Conclusions The Sarcoma-GPA index provides a novel tool for sarcoma oncologists to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes research.

Additional file 1: Table S1. Treatment modalities. BSC: best supportive care; MD: missing data; SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery; WBRT: whole-brain radiotherapy

Additional file 2: Table S2. Treatment modalities per histology group BSC: best supportive care; SRS: stereotactic radiosurgery; WBRT: whole-brain radiotherapy.

Highlights • The initial treatment decision for newly diagnosed non-metastatic prostate cancer is complex. • Specialist multidisciplinary consultations focus on shared decision-making. • The Gustave Roussy PCMC rendered high patient satisfaction and promoted active participation. • Information offered at the Gustave Roussy PCMC strongly influenced final treatment decisions., Objectives The initial treatment decision for newly diagnosed non-metastatic prostate cancer is complex. Multiple valid approaches exist, without a clear and absolute consensus for every clinical scenario, and therefore specialist opinions may vary. Multidisciplinary consultations focusing on shared decision-making aim to provide an apposite tool for the initial treatment decision. We have evaluated the first two years of activity of the Gustave Roussy Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic (PCMC), dedicated to the initial decision-making for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Methods PCMC consists of two consecutive specialist consultations with a urological surgeon and a radiation oncologist, followed by a dedicated Tumor Board discussion. A study questionnaire was addressed to all PCMC patients via postal mail. Medical notes and questionnaire responses of 195 eligible patients were analyzed. Results The questionnaire response rate was 69% (134 patients). Complete satisfaction rate was high (114 of 118 responders, 97%). Patients were offered new treatment options in 55% of cases, and felt better informed in 98% (122 of 125 responders). The double consultation was considered useful (124 of 129 responders, 96%). Reported feeling of active participation was significantly elevated (117 of 131 responders, 89%), while 46% of patients (57 of 125) modified their decision on the management of their prostate cancer following their PCMC consultation. Conclusions The experience of a multidisciplinary consultation in the initial management of non-metastatic prostate cancer renders high patient satisfaction, improves their appreciation of feeling better informed, promotes active participation and shared decision-making and strongly influences their final decision.

Objective Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy with a high recurrence and mortality rates. More than half of MCCs occur in the head and neck region. This paper aims to present a retrospective case series study of primary MCCs of the head and neck treated in our department over 12 years. Study Design Six patients were identified, and their characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes are reported. A critical review of the current literature is also included to provide up-to-date information on MCCs with special emphasis on treatment modalities and disease prognosis. Results Management of head and neck MCCs requires early and accurate diagnosis and includes surgery, radiotherapy, and/or combination chemotherapy. Accurate cervical nodal staging is of paramount importance before establishing the definite treatment plan. Conclusions The results of both our case series and literature data review indicate that elective management of regional lymph nodes is recommended instead of an observation approach for patients with no identifiable disease in the lymph nodes (cN0). Because the majority of MCCs arise in the head and neck region, oral and maxillofacial surgeons are likely be the first professionals who will encounter this disease and should therefore be aware of the current diagnostic and treatment modalities.

The BRF14 trial is a prominent study that investigated the effect of prolonged imatinib treatment in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. The key messages deduced from this study are as follows: imatinib drastically improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Treatment ought to be maintained indefinitely in nonprogressing patients, as interruption entails a high risk of progression, even in patients in complete response. Imatinib rechallenge is effective, achieving new disease control in patients progressing after imatinib interruption. Rechallenge response profiles reflect the initial responses, albeit of poorer quality. Imatinib interruption does not affect the incidence of secondary resistance; however, the imatinib-free interval influences the time to secondary resistance. Specific clinical, biological and molecular characteristics seem to identify the patients who are long responders to imatinib. Surgery of residual disease after maximal imatinib response improves progression-free and overall survival.

There is controversy regarding prognosis and treatment of young patients with oral cavity cancer compared to their older counterparts. We conducted a retrospective case-matched analysis of all adult patients younger than 40 years and treated at our institution for a squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Only non-metastatic adult patients (age >18) with oral tongue cancer were eventually included and matched 1:1 with patients over 40 years of age, at least 20 years older than the cases, with same T and N category and treatment period. Sixty-three patients younger than 40 had an oral cavity squamous cell cancer out of which 57 had an oral tongue primary during the period 1999–2012, and 50 could be matched with an older control. No difference could be seen between younger and older patients with regard to overall, cancer-specific, or progression-free survival. The patterns of failure were similar, although in young patients, almost all failures occurred during the first 2 years following treatment. Although overall survival shows a trend toward lower survival in older patients, cancer-specific survival and analysis of pattern failure suggest that disease prognosis is similar between young and older adults with oral tongue cancer. Further work is needed to identify the younger patients with poorer prognosis who overwhelmingly fail during the first year after treatment and could benefit from treatment intensification. Until then, young adults ought to be treated using standard guidelines.

437 Background: DZB is an oral small-molecule FGFR1/2/3 kinase inhibitor, which demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical and clinical studies (in cholangiocarcinoma patients [pts] with FGFR2-driven tumors and in FGFR1-3-driven urothelial cancer [UC] PDX models). In CSF1-stimulated mouse bone-marrow derived macrophages, DZB reduced CSF1R phosphorylation with a maximal effect similar to the selective CSF1R inhibitor BLZ945, suggesting DZB could have an effect on tumor-associated macrophage regulation. Thus, DZB+AZB is a rationale combination to be investigated in immunogenic and FGFR-driven tumors like UC. Methods: FIDES-02 is a multi-cohort open-label Phase 1b/2 study evaluating the effect of DZB as monotherapy and DZB+AZB in combination. To determine the RP2D of DZB+AZB, a total of 26 pts with UC (N = 4) and other solid tumors (N = 22), of whom 7 pts carried various FGFR genetic aberrations (GA), were enrolled at 2 dose levels (DL) (1200 mg AZB Q3W + 200 mg [DL1] / 300 mg [DL2] DZB QD) and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Both DLs were divided into MTD (endpoint: dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] at D21) and expansion cohorts to investigate both acute and delayed adverse events (AEs) per CTCAE v5. Results: In the MTD cohorts of both DL1 (N = 7) and DL2 (N = 6) no DLTs were observed, and the DL1 and DL2 expansion cohorts subsequently enrolled 7 and 6 pts, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs across both DLs were fatigue (31%), nausea (27%), diarrhea (23%), the most frequent laboratory abnormalities were increased ALT (58%), and AST (50%). Non-DLT grade (G) ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAE) across both DLs were G3 diarrhea (4%), G3 nausea (4%), G3 asthenia (4%), oral fungal infection (4%) and one case of immune-related G4 nephritis (4%). Dose interruptions / reductions and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 19% and 8%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated that DZB exposure parameters and AZB serum concentrations in pts treated with DZB+AZB were similar to those assessed in pts under DZB / AZB monotherapy. At data cut-off, 2 of 14 (DL1) and 7 of 12 pts (DL2) were still on treatment. Median duration of treatment in DL1 was 9.7 weeks (range, 9-25), and best overall response per investigator assessment was SD in 4 of 10 efficacy-evaluable DL1 pts. DL2 efficacy analysis was uninformative at cutoff. The combination of 1200 mg AZB Q3W with both 200 mg and 300 mg QD DZB was found to be safe and tolerable. Conclusions: The combination of DZB+AZB is safe at both investigated DLs, the RP2D has been determined as 300 mg DZB QD+1200 mg AZB Q3W. DZB can be safely dosed at its monotherapy RP2D in this novel combination with AZB. The anti-tumor efficacy of DZB+AZB is currently being investigated in adequately designed cohorts of FIDES-02 with enrichment for UC pts with FGFR GA. Clinical trial information: NCT04045613.

TPS185 Background: LIV-1 is a transmembrane protein expressed in a variety of cancer types. SGN-LIV1A, or ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV), is a novel investigational humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LIV-1. LV mediates delivery of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which drives antitumor activity through cytotoxic cell killing and induces immunogenic cell death. In a phase 1 study, LV was tolerable and active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (Modi 2017). This study is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of LV in different advanced solid tumors with various LIV-1 expression, including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and nonsquamous), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Methods: SGNLVA-005 (NCT04032704) is an open-label, phase 2 study evaluating LV monotherapy in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced solid tumors, including mCRPC. Patients with mCRPC will receive LV administered as a 30 minute intravenous infusion (IV) at 1.25 mg/kg every 1 week. Up to 30 patients with mCRPC will be enrolled. Patients in the mCRPC cohort must have metastatic castration-resistant disease, have received no more than 1 prior line of androgen receptor-targeted therapy, have ≥28 days between androgen receptor-targeted therapy and start of study treatment, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. In addition, mCRPC patients with measurable and non-measurable disease are eligible if the protocol-defined criteria are met. mCRPC patients must not have BRCA gene mutations, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic mCRPC setting, prior radioisotope therapy, or radiotherapy to ≥30% of bone marrow. Patients are not preselected based on tumor LIV-1 expression. Their tumor samples will be analyzed for correlation between LIV-1 expression and response. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study. Study objectives include objective tumor response rate per RECIST 1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (both primary); safety and tolerability, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (all secondary); and pharmacodynamics. Study accrual is ongoing in the USA, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the UK. Clinical trial information: NCT04032704.

Objectives: Metastatic tumors to the oral cavity are observed extremely rarely, accounting for approximately 1% of all malignant oral lesions. The purpose of our study is to record and analyze the data of the patients who revealed metastasis to the oral cavity. Material and Methods: The records of the patients diagnosed with oral metastases who were admitted to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Departments from 1996 to 2018 were reviewed and analyzed for demographic data and outcomes. Results: Over a period of 22 years (from 1996 to 2018), 22 patients were admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Departments of General Hospital G. Papanikolaou and Theageneion Anticancer Hospital with oral metastasic tumors from a distant primary site. Conclusions: Metastasis to the oral cavity is a very rare finding but it exists so we have to be aware of it and have in mind the possibility of this condition.

immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) have shown contradictory results in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal junction/gastric cancer(GOJ/GC).to identify specific patient subgroups that would derive survival benefit from ICIs.a subgroup meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials(RCTs) was carried out.four phase-III-RCTs were identified with data on the following variables: primary location(Gastric vs GOJ); age(≤ 65 vs65); gender(male vs female); ECOG PS(0 vs 1); ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), histology(intestinal vs diffuse), PD-L1 expression(≥ 1% vs1%). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with survival benefit from ICIs (HR: 0.82, p 0.047), with a significant interaction between PD-L1 expression and ICI efficacy (interaction HR: 1.41, p 0.02). Numerically, the second most relevant interaction was ICI efficacy and gender, with ICI being more effective in males.The PD-L1 positive patient subgroup derives significant survival benefit from ICI in GOJ/GC, however other predictors are eagerly needed to further refine patient selection.

France's ethical and legal principles place general practitioners (GPs) at the forefront of cancer patient management, coordination, and follow-up. The objective of this study was to determine the actual role of GPs in the follow-up phase as well as patient perspectives on their GPs.A multidisciplinary group of researchers conducted this qualitative study based on in-depth interviews of 50 patients managed at two cancer centres. A content analysis method was used to analyse the study data.According to the patients interviewed for this study, their GPs were relatively ineffective at managing medical problems related to cancer by comparison with their oncologists. Nonetheless, the patients had all consulted their GPs during the interval between the diagnosis and our interview. Reasons given for consulting their GPs included administrative matters, psychological support, reassurance, and advice, but also to a lesser extent, medical management.Patients' perspectives called attention to two aspects of the role of GPs in the French healthcare system: (a) the importance of GPs within an effective system for managing cancer patients, and (b) for some patients, GPs' relative lack of medical skill compared to oncologists.

4530 Background: ICIs demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in heavily pre-treated mGOJ/GC pts. Pts selection exclusively based on PD-L1 tissue expression appears to be suboptimal, despite data from subgroup analyses of KEYNOTE trials. Strong rationale suggests a potential predictive role of inflammatory biomarkers in ICIs treated mGOJ/GC pts. Methods: Ten systemic inflammatory markers [platelets, monocytes, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelets-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocytes, sum of mononuclear cells, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, c-reactive protein (CRP) and serum globulin] were retrospectively analyzed at baseline in 57 mGOJ/GC pts with unknown PD-L1 status treated in second-line with ICIs, and correlated with OS. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used to select variables (preliminarily subject to optimal coding using HR smoothed curves for OS) with the highest prognostic value. Selected variables were then analyzed in a multivariate Cox Regression Model and used to build a GIPI nomogram. Results: NLR and CRP taken as continuous variables and albumin categorized as < vs > 30 g/dL were found as the most meaningful independent predictors of OS and used to build the GIPI nomogram. Nomogram-based lowest (l), mid-low, mid-high and highest (h) risk quartiles were associated with median(m)OS of 14.9, 7.1, 5.6 and 2.1 months (mos), respectively [HR of l vs h 4.94, p 0.0002]. By optimally dichotomizing CRP and NLR, pts with one or more of the following risk factors: NLR >6, CRP >15 mg/L, albumin

417 Background: ICIs demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in heavily pre-treated mGOJ/GC pts. Pts selection exclusively based on PD-L1 tissue expression appears to be suboptimal, despite data from subgroup analyses of KEYNOTE trials. Strong rationale suggests a potential predictive role of inflammatory biomarkers in ICIs treated mGOJ/GC pts. Methods: 11 systemic inflammatory markers [platelets, monocytes, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelets-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocytes, sum of mononuclear cells, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), c-reactive protein (CRP) and serum globulin] were retrospectively analyzed at baseline in 57 mGOJ/GC pts with unknown PD-L1 status treated in second-line with ICIs, and correlated with OS. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was used to select variables (preliminarily subject to optimal coding using HR smoothed curves for OS) with the highest prognostic value.Selected variables were then analysed in a multivariate Cox Regression Model and used to build a GIPI nomogram. Results: NLR and CRP taken as continuous variables and ALP categorized as < vs > 150 IU/L were found as the most meaningful independent predictors of OS [(HR 1.30 (95%CI 1.02-1.65), 2.00 (95%CI 1.09-3.66), 2.82 (95%CI 1.29-6.20) and p values 0.04, 0.01, 0.02, respectively)] and used to build the GIPI nomogram. Nomogram-based lowest(l), mid and highest(h) risk tertiles were associated with median(m)OS of 14.5,10.6 and 2.4 months(mos), respectively [HR of l vs h 0.26 (95%CI 0.12-0.53), p 0.0002]. By optimally dichotomizing CRP and NLR, pts with one or more of the following risk factors: NLR > 6, CRP > 15 mg/L, ALP < 150 IU/L (n: 31) had a mOS of 3.9mos vs 14.5mos of pts with no risk factor (n: 26) (HR 2.72, p 0.0005). Conclusions: GIPI, combining NLR, CRP and ALP, is the first inflammatory index with a significant prognostic value in mOGJ/GC pts receiving second line ICIs. Its implementation with analysis of PD-L1 expression in the present cohort is ongoing. GIPI merits validation in external cohorts and prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The clinical development of immunotherapy is still limited for patients with malignant glioma. We report the results of a phase I/II study of the IMA950 multipeptide vaccine adjuvanted with the TLR3 agonist poly-ICLC in association with radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed HLA-A2+ malignant glioma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed GBM (n=16) and grade III astrocytoma (n=3) were treated concomitantly with radiochemotherapy with the IMA950 multipeptide vaccine and poly-ICLC. The first 6 patients received IMA950 i.d. and poly-ICLC i.m. Afterwards, the protocol was amended and patients received IMA950 and poly-ICLC mixed and injected s.c. (n=7) or i.m. (n=6). Primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity. Secondary endpoints were OS, PFS at 6 and 9 months, as well as immunological characterization of peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cell responses. RESULTS: The IMA950/poly-ICLC vaccine was safe and well tolerated. Four patients presented cerebral edema with rapid recovery with standard management. For the first 6 patients, vaccine-induced CD8 T cell responses were restricted to a single peptide and CD4 responses were not detectable. After optimization of the vaccine formulation, we observed multipeptide CD8 and sustained Th1 CD4 T cell responses. For the entire cohort (n=19), CD8 T cell responses to a single or multiple peptides were observed in 63.2% and 36.8% of patients, respectively. An encouraging median overall survival of 21 months was obtained in this non-selected patient population. CONCLUSION: Using previously identified immunogenic GBM antigens, we provide insights into optimization of vaccines generating effector T cells for glioma patients.Support: Gateway for cancer research, Rising Tide Foundation, Fondation Lionel Perrier, Association Frederic Fellay, Fondation Privée des Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, OncoSuisse (to PYD, KFS 3270-08-2013), Fond’action, Association Marietta

Background Brain metastases (BM) from adult soft tissue or bone sarcomas are rare, and sparse data exist on their prognostic factors and management. Subjects, Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 15 centers of the French Sarcoma Group, plus one Canadian and one Swiss center, to report on clinical, histological, and treatment characteristics and to identify predictive factors of outcome. Results Between 1992 and 2012, 246 patients with a median age of 50 years (range: 16–86) were managed for BM. BM included 221 cerebral and cerebellar metastases and 40 cases of meningeal sarcomatosis. The most frequent histopathological subtype was leiomyosarcoma (18.7%). Histological grade was high in 118 (48%) cases. Surgery of BM was carried out for 38 (15.5%) patients. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered in 168 (68.3%) and 91 (37.0%) patients, respectively. Irrespective of treatment modality, BM were controlled in 113 patients (45.9%), including 31 partial responses (12.6%) and 18 complete responses (7.3%). The median overall survival from diagnosis of brain metastasis was 2.7 months (range: 0–133). In the multivariate analysis, the following parameters influenced overall survival: chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26–0.48), surgery (HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22–0.72), stereotactic radiotherapy (HR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19–0.90), whole-brain radiotherapy (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.35–0.76), and grade (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43–0.98). Conclusion BM of sarcomas are rare and associated with a dismal outcome. Multidisciplinary management with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery is associated with a better survival. Implications for Practice The incidence of brain and meningeal metastasis in bone and soft tissue sarcomas is estimated between 1% and 8%. Published data are derived from small retrospective case series, often in the pediatric population. A prognostic index is important to guide both clinical decision-making and outcomes research, but one such is lacking for adult sarcoma patients with brain metastases. The current study describes brain metastasis in a large cohort of sarcoma patients. This study, conducted within the French Sarcoma Group, describes the natural history of sarcoma brain metastasis and enables the proposal of strategic recommendations for subsequent clinical trials and for the management of such patients.