Search

Normotrophic, hypertrophic, and keloidal scars are different types of scar formation, which all need a different approach in treatment. Therefore, it is important to differentiate between these types of scar, not only clinically but also histopathologically. Differences were explored for collagen orientation and bundle thickness in 25 normal skin, 57 normotrophic scar, 56 hypertrophic scar, and 56 keloid biopsies, which were selected on clinical diagnosis. Image analysis was performed by fast fourier transformation. The calculated collagen orientation index ranged from 0 (random orientation) to 1 (parallel orientation). The bundle distance was calculated by the average distance between the centers of the collagen bundles. The results showed that compared with all three types of scars, the collagen orientation index was significantly lower in normal skin, which indicates that scars are organized in a more parallel manner. No differences were found between the different scars. Secondly, compared with normal skin, normotrophic scar, and hypertrophic scar, the bundle distance was significantly larger in keloidal scar, which suggests that thicker collagen bundles are present in keloidal scar. This first extensive histological study showed objective differences between normal skin, normotrophic, hypertrophic, and keloidal scar.

Although hypertrophic scarring commonly occurs following burns, many aspects such as incidence of and optimal treatment for scar hypertrophy remain unclear. This review will focus on hypertrophic scar formation after burn in particular, exploring multiple treatment options and describing their properties as well as effectiveness. To evaluate treatment efficacy and scar development, clinical scar assessment is of eminent importance. Furthermore, recommendations regarding the classification of hypertrophy in the daily practice and in clinical trials are implemented.

In this work, different fibroblast-like (mesenchymal) cell populations that might be involved in wound healing were characterized and their involvement in scar formation was studied by determining collagen synthesis and processing. Depending on the physical and mechanical properties of the tissues, specific collagen cross-linking routes are followed. In skin the cross-linking of the pyridinium type is normally very low; however, in different forms of fibrosis increased levels of this type of cross-linking have been found. The enzyme lysyl hydroxylase-2b (LH-2b) plays a crucial role in this type of cross-linking. The gene expression levels of LH-2b, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and collagen types I and III were determined in dermis, subcutaneous fat, and (hypertrophic) scar tissue as well as in isolated cultured mesenchymal cells derived from these tissues, by real-time RT-polymerase chain reaction. Cultured mesenchymal cells from fat and scar tissue as well as the tissues itself showed significantly higher expression of LH-2b, alpha-SMA, and collagen type I than dermal mesenchymal cells. LH-2b-dependent pyridinium cross-linking was significantly enhanced in fat and scar tissue compared with dermis. FACS analysis was performed to characterize the fibroblast-like cells from the dermis, fat, and scar tissue. All cell populations express the distinct pattern of CD markers also expressed by mesenchymal stromal cells. Furthermore, parts of these cell populations were able to differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. We conclude, therefore, that mesenchymal (stem) cells from the subcutaneous fat might be responsible for the accumulation of collagen in these scars.

One hundred and seven bilateral breast reductions were prospectively randomised during surgery to receive or not receive wound drains. Fifty-five patients were randomised to have a drain and 52 to not have a drain. There was no statistical difference in the number of complications between the drained and undrained group (P = 0.092; student's t-test for independent observations). Twenty-two of the 55 patients in the drained group had a complication, 12 of the 52 patients in the undrained group had a complication. The hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in the undrained group. The main discomfort score due to the presence of the drains was 5.62, which can be qualified as high. This study demonstrates that breast reduction without postoperative draining does not increase the risk of complications, increases the patient's comfort and significantly reduces hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the best way to treat keloids, because adequate studies on this subject are sparse. Surgical excision in combination with radiotherapy is considered the most efficacious treatment available in severe keloids following the International Clinical Recommendations on Scar Management. Unfortunately, the recommendations are mainly based on retrospective studies that do not define recurrence. METHODS: The authors evaluated the recurrence rate of therapy-resistant keloids treated with excision followed by radiotherapy (1200 Gy in three or four fractions). The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. The therapeutic outcome was judged as recurrence (elevation of the lesion not confined to the original wound area) or nonrecurrence. An evaluation of the outcome of the scars was obtained by using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 32 keloids were evaluated. The recurrence rate was 71.9 percent after a mean follow-up period of 19 months. CONCLUSIONS: This high recurrence rate suggests that radiotherapy might be less efficacious than suggested by other studies. On the basis of the authors' results, surgical excision combined with radiotherapy should be reserved as a last resort in the treatment of therapy-resistant keloids.

The applicability of simple methods to measure the size of pathological skin lesions for management and research has been poorly studied to date. The interobserver reliability and accuracy (validity) was established for planimetry by photography and planimetry by tracing on a transparent sheet in this study. Drawings of 25, 50, and 75 cm2 were created on 3 locations with increasing curvature (back, thigh, and forearm) in 20 healthy volunteers. Three investigators evaluated the drawings by both planimetry techniques. Both techniques showed a good reliability (r ≥ 0.82, intraclass correlation) for 25 cm2 areas. Planimetry by photography was more reliable than planimetry by tracings for the 50 -and 75-cm2 areas and was more accurate than planimetry by tracing for all areas except for the area with the greatest curvature, the forearm. The study permits the conclusion that planimetry by photography is more suitable for surface area measurements than planimetry by tracing except for extremely curved body parts, where it is likely that effects of distortion supervene.

The evaluation of scar colour is, at present, usually limited to an assessment according to a scar assessment scale. Although useful, these assessment scales only evaluate subjectively the degree of scar colour. In this study, the reliability of the subjective assessment of scar colour by observers is compared to the reliability of the measurements of two objective colour measurement instruments. Four independent observers subjectively assessed the vascularisation and pigmentation of 49 scar areas in 20 patients. The degree of vascularisation and pigmentation was scored according to a scale ranging from '1', when it appeared to be like healthy skin, to '10', which corresponds to the worst imaginable outcome of vascularisation or pigmentation. The observers also scored the pigmentation categories of the scar (hypopigmention, hyperpigmention or mixed pigmentation). Finally, each observer measured the scar areas with a tristimulus colorimeter (Minolta Chromameter) and a narrow-band simple reflectance meter (DermaSpectrometer). A single observer could reliably carry out measurements of the DermaSpectrometer and the Minolta Chromameter for the evaluation of scar colour (r = 0.72). The vascularisation of scars could also be assessed reliably with a single observer (r = 0.76) whereas for a reliable assessment of pigmentation at least three observers were necessary (r > or = 0.77). The agreement between the observers for the pigmentation categories also turned out to be unacceptably low (k = 0.349). This study shows that an overall evaluation of scar colour with the DermaSpectrometer and the Minolta Chromameter is more reliable than the evaluation of scar colour with observers. Of both instruments for measuring scar colour, we prefer, because of its feasibility, the DermaSpectrometer.

Dermal collagen displays a random-like structure that has a major role in strength and function of the human integument. It is hypothesised that collagen bundles align in a parallel fashion in the direction of mechanical tension during scarring, which may explain the problematic scar formation that occurs specifically at joints. Scar tissue and normal skin were biopsied from joints and control areas and evaluated by the Fourier analysis. Collagen orientation was represented by an index ranging from 0 (perfectly random) to 1 (perfectly parallel). Collagen bundle packing signifies the average distance between the centres of collagen bundles. No differences were shown in collagen morphology of scar tissue and normal skin between joints and control areas. Normal skin had a significantly lower collagen orientation index than scar tissue (0.26 versus 0.44, P

In human dermis, collagen bundle architecture appears randomly organized, whereas in pathological conditions, such as scar tissue and connective tissue disorders, collagen bundle architecture is arranged in a more parallel fashion. Histological examination by one or two observers using polarized light is the most common method to determine collagen orientation. The hypothesis on which this study is based is that an objective image analysis technique, Fourier analysis, would improve the reliability (are the measurements reproducible?) and the accuracy (does the method measure what it is supposed to measure?) of collagen orientation assessment, compared with observer ratings. Fourier analysis was applied to 271 images of scar tissue and normal skin that were acquired by confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Observers rated the same areas using polarized light as well as the confocal microscopy images. Computer images consisting of different types of ellipses were generated with a fixed orientation. Observers and Fourier analysis evaluated the images to evaluate accuracy. The inter-observer reliability was acceptable when at least three observers rated polarized light images (r > 0.69), whereas two observers were sufficient for rating confocal microscopy images (r > 0.71). Fourier analysis correlated better with observer ratings of confocal microscopy images (r = 0.69) than with polarized light microscopy images (r = 0.42). Fourier analysis was more accurate than four observers for the evaluation of the 'true' orientation for almost all types of computer-generated images. For the first time it is shown that Fourier image analysis is suitable for the morphometry of dermal collagen orientation and leads to a superior measurement of collagen orientation compared with subjective histological evaluation by several experts. If an evaluation is performed by conventional light microscopy, at least three observers are required to attain an acceptable inter-observer reliability.

Although dermal substitution is a main topic of current wound healing research, there is a paucity of clinical trials with a long-term clinical and histopathological evaluation. A clinical trial was conducted to perform an intra-individual comparison of conventional treatment (split-thickness autograft) to a collagen/elastin dermal substitute in combination with an autograft. Promising results with this substitute were obtained with respect to dermal organisation and scar elasticity in animal studies and clinical trials with a short-term follow-up. Twenty-nine of the 42 pairs of the burn wounds and 28 of the 44 pairs of the scar reconstructions enrolled in the study were biopsied after 1 year. Promising but not statistically significant differences were found between substituted groups and control groups for epidermal thickness, basement membrane maturation, rete ridges (P=0.055), fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, inflammatory cells, vessels and extracellular matrix maturation. An objective and accurate technique, Fourier analysis, was used to evaluate collagen bundle orientation and packing. However, no statistically significant differences were obtained for these parameters. This microscopic evaluation provided no convincing evidence for a long-term effectiveness of a dermal substitute despite promising data over a short-term in in vitro and in vivo studies with the same material.

Scleroderma, a chronic, progressive disorder, is characterized by dermal fibrosis with collagen bundles orientated parallel to the epidermis. Simple objective parameters to evaluate disease progression and therapies are needed. We describe two methods, the laser scatter method and the fast Fourier transform (FFT), to measure collagen bundle orientation and spacing. Lesional sclerodermic skin (LS), nonlesional sclerodermic skin (nonLS), and control skin (CS) sections were evaluated for orientation ratio using the laser scatter method. The FFT was used to calculate orientation ratio, variation, and spacing of collagen bundles. Parameters were correlated with local and mean skin score measurements, on a scale of 0 (normal) to 3 (severely sclerotic). With both the laser scatter method and the FFT, orientation ratios of LS (respectively, 2.16 +/- 0.33 and 1.83 +/- 0.62) were significantly higher than CS (respectively, 1.70 +/- 0.35 and 1.38 +/- 0.15). NonLS orientation ratios (respectively, 1.92 +/- 0.15 and 1.48 +/- 0.44) were between LS and CS ratios. Orientation variation and bundle spacing of LS (respectively, 57.3 +/- 19.4 and 15.7 +/- 5.6 microm) were significantly reduced compared to CS (respectively, 73.8 +/- 15.0 and 18.9 +/- 1.9 microm). NonLS orientation ratios (respectively, 57.2 +/- 29.0 and 15.6 +/- 6.1 microm) were similar to LS. Bundles in LS are more parallel, show less variation in orientation, and are more densely packed than in CS. There was a linear correlation between mean skin score and orientation ratio. Local skin score was not linearly correlated to orientation ratio. Our findings suggest that nonLS dermis without clinical sclerosis already shows fibrotic characteristics. Both techniques were easy to use and suitable for objectifying dermal fibrosis in scleroderma lesions. FFT is more accurate and reproducible than the laser scatter method and allows simultaneous pathological evaluation of the location of the analyzed tissue sections. Future studies will need to focus on the correlation between clinical disease severity and collagen bundle characteristics.

Survival of the autograft and objective parameters for scar elasticity were evaluated after dermal substitution for acute burns and reconstructive surgery. The dermal substitute, which was based on bovine type I collagen and elastin-hydrolysate, was evaluated by intraindividual comparison in a clinical trial. The substitute was applied in a one-step procedure in combination with a split-thickness autograft. This treatment was compared with the conventional treatment, the split-thickness autograft. After 1 week, the percentage of autograft survival was assessed. The Cutometer SEM 474 was used to obtain objective measurements of skin elasticity parameters 3 to 4 months postoperatively. Forty-two pairs of wounds (31 patients, age 32.9 ± 19.3 years; burned surface area, 19.8 ± 14.5 percent) were treated because of acute burns. Reconstructive surgery was performed on 44 pairs of wounds (31 patients, age 33.9 ± 17.5 years). Autograft survival was not altered by the substitute for reconstructive wounds, although a slight but significant reduction (p = 0.015) was established in the burn category for substituted compared with nonsubstituted wounds. However, the necessity for regrafting was not increased by substitution. Cutometer measurements of reconstructive wounds with a dermal substitute demonstrated a significant increase of pliability (50 percent, p < 0.001), elasticity (defined as immediate extension, 33 percent, p = 0.04), maximal extension (33 percent, p = 0.002), and immediate retraction (31 percent, p = 0.01), as compared with nonsubstituted wounds. After burn surgery, no improvement was found for the different elasticity parameters. Dermal substitution in a one-stage grafting model seems feasible with respect to graft survival. Skin elasticity was considerably improved by the collagen/elastin dermal substitute after reconstructive surgery.