101. To plug or not to plug?
- Author
-
Robert E. Fromm and Joseph Varon
- Subjects
Cardiac Catheterization ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Punctures ,Femoral artery ,Postoperative Hemorrhage ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,law.invention ,Coronary artery disease ,arterial puncture ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Meta-Analysis as Topic ,law ,medicine.artery ,Pressure ,Humans ,Medicine ,percutaneous coronary angioplasty ,Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ,Spark plug ,Cardiac catheterization ,Hematoma ,Wound Healing ,Hemostatic Techniques ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Bandages ,Hemostatic technique ,Surgery ,Femoral Artery ,Commentary ,hemostasis ,business ,Arterial puncture - Abstract
Coronary artery disease remains a common problem in industrialized countries. Percutaneous coronary interventions are usually performed utilizing the femoral approach. Arterial puncture-closing devices have been developed in hope to avoid manual compression and shortening the period of rest. In a recent meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Medical Association these devices have shown only marginal benefits over manual compression. Further, well designed studies are necessary to document the comparative effects of these devices versus manual compression.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF