101. Comparing the rates of low-value back images ordered by physicians and nurse practitioners for Medicare beneficiaries in primary care.
- Author
-
O'Reilly-Jacob M, Perloff J, and Buerhaus P
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Back Pain economics, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Medicare statistics & numerical data, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care statistics & numerical data, Retrospective Studies, United States, Back Pain diagnostic imaging, Diagnostic Imaging economics, Diagnostic Imaging statistics & numerical data, Medicare economics, Nurse Practitioners statistics & numerical data, Physicians, Primary Care statistics & numerical data, Primary Health Care economics
- Abstract
Background: Little is known about the extent of ordering low-value services by., Purpose: To compare the rates of low-value back images ordered by primary care physicians (PCMDs) and primary care nurse practitioners (PCNPs)., Method: We used 2012 and 2013 Medicare Part B claims for all beneficiaries in 18 hospital referral ̱regions (HRRs) and a measure of low-value back imaging from Choosing Wisely. Models included random clinician effect and fixed effects for beneficiary age, disability, Elixhauser comorbidities, clinician sex, the emergency department setting, back pain visit volume, organization, and region (HRR)., Findings: PCNPs (N = 231) and PCMDs (N = 4,779) order low-value back images at similar rates (NP: all images: 26.5%; MRI/CT: 8.4%; MD: all images: 24.5%; MRI/CT: 7.7%), with no detectable significant difference when controlling for covariates., Discussion: PCNPs and PCMDs order low-value back images at an effectively similar rate., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF