101. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
- Author
-
de Araújo DF, Chaves LP, Bim O Jr, Pimentel Garcia FC, Ishikiriama SK, Honório HM, and Wang L
- Subjects
- Animals, Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate chemistry, Cattle, Chlorhexidine chemistry, Composite Resins chemistry, Dentin ultrastructure, Materials Testing, Polyethylene Glycols chemistry, Polymethacrylic Acids chemistry, Random Allocation, Root Canal Preparation methods, Saliva, Artificial chemistry, Self-Curing of Dental Resins, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Time Factors, Tooth Apex ultrastructure, Chlorhexidine analogs & derivatives, Dental Bonding, Dental Materials chemistry, Dental Pulp Cavity ultrastructure, Enzyme Inhibitors chemistry, Glass chemistry, Glass Ionomer Cements chemistry, Post and Core Technique instrumentation, Resin Cements chemistry
- Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) on the bond strength (BS) of a glass-fibre post to the root canal, regarding the cements (dual-cured resin or resin-modified glass-ionomer cement), the root thirds and the time of storage., Method: Eighty bovine roots were selected and endodontically treated, before being randomly assigned to the following groups according to the luting protocol: ARC (RelyX ARC); ARC+CHX; RL (RelyX Luting 2); and RL+CHX. After 24 h of luting, the roots were sliced to obtain 1 mm-thick slices. Half of each group was submitted to either 7-day or 6-month storage in artificial saliva (n=10). The specimens were subjected to push-out tests with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analysed with four-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P≤0.05). The failure modes were analysed with a digital microscope (50× and 200×)., Results: ARC yielded a significantly higher BS compared to RL (P<0.001). Despite CHX exerted a significant effect; it depends on the interaction with the luting cement and time (P<0.001). Thus, CHX decreased the values of BS to those of ARC after 6 months (P<0.001). On the 7th day of storage, the ARC+CHX presented higher BS to the cervical and middle thirds compared to RL+CHX (P=0.012). Time solely was not a significant factor (P=0.081). Adhesive cement-dentine type and mixed failures were predominant modes for the ARC groups. For the RL groups, the main failures were adhesive cement-post and mixed modes., Conclusions: Glass-fibre posts luted with RelyX ARC dual-cure resin cement exhibited higher BS than those luted with RelyX Luting 2 resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Furthermore, CHX was not effective to improve the BS and negatively affected the BS of RelyX ARC after 6 months of storage., Clinical Significance: The use of chlorhexidine solution seems not to improve the bond strength of fibre posts to root canals, disregarding the composition of the luting cement., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF