Search

Purpose: Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) experience a variety of symptoms. This descriptive correlational study aimed to determine the prevalence of symptoms and the physiological and situational factors associated with these symptoms in ICU patients. Methods: We analyzed the Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of 1,214 cases admitted to and discharged from the ICUs of a university hospital in Seoul over a 1-year period from June to September 2022. This analysis utilized standardized instruments embedded in EMRs and a natural language analysis framework developed by the researchers. Descriptive statistics, the x2 test, the Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression were employed to identify common symptoms and their related factors. Results: In total, 85.7% of the cases had at least one symptom during their ICU stay, and 36.6% experienced 2 symptoms. Pain was the most frequently experienced symptom, affecting 69.5% of cases, followed by agitation (29.7%), dyspnea (29.7%), and delirium (4.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the length of ICU stay influenced pain (odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02~1.06; p<.001), delirium (OR=1.08; 95% CI, 1.06~1.11; p<.001), agitation (OR=1.07; 95% CI, 1.05~1.10; p<.001), and dyspnea (OR=1.19; 95% CI, 1.13~1.26; p<.001). Conclusion: Pain, agitation, and dyspnea are common in ICU patients and are associated with the length of their ICU stay. Our study identifies factors related to these symptoms that could be targeted to manage and reduce their occurrence, providing a foundation for future research on various symptom assessment tools and natural language transcripts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work presents the beginning of the follow up of a particularly agitated five-year-old child, the effects of which we will attempt to extricate as closely as possible in relation to the first sessions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to conduct a naturalistic assessment of the efficacy of four distinct fast tranquilization techniques (intramuscular haloperidol, midazolam, haloperidol plus promethazine, or haloperidol plus midazolam) over a period of 12 h. The sample included 1603 people who were psychiatric emergency room patients at Hospital Geral de Palmas in Brazil between January 2018 and June 2022. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of patients who achieved the ideal response of the rapid tranquilization concept: tranquil without sedation in all assessments (measure by BARS scale), without restraint, without additional medication and without side effects. The secondary outcomes were mild agitation, tranquil or asleep over 12 h, the need for additional medication, use of physical restraints, and side effects. Among all patients, the proportion of rapid tranquilization over 12 h was 14.1% besides (32.9% for haloperidol, 29.2% for midazolam, 4.1% for haloperidol plus promethazine, and 5.4% for haloperidol plus midazolam) there is response some time in 97%. Logistic regression assessed the rapid tranquilization concept with to haloperidol as parameter: midazolam Exp(B) = 0.718 (95% CI 0.362–1.421), p = 0.341, had no difference; haloperidol plus promethazine Exp(B) = 0.011 (95% CI 0.004–0.026), p