101. Subclassification of the Koos grade 2 vestibular schwannoma into 2a and 2b for individualized patient care: A validity and reliability study
- Author
-
Ineke M.J. Pruijn, Jérôme J. Waterval, Mark ter Laan, Yasin Temel, Sjoert A.H. Pegge, Alida A. Postma, Jeroen B. Verheul, Daniëlle B.P. Eekers, Wietske Kievit, Henricus P.M. Kunst, MUMC+: MA Keel Neus Oorheelkunde (9), RS: MHeNs - R3 - Neuroscience, Neurochirurgie, MUMC+: MA Neurochirurgie (3), RS: MHeNs - R1 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Beeldvorming, MUMC+: DA BV Medisch Specialisten Radiologie (9), MUMC+: DA BV AIOS Nucleaire Geneeskunde (8), MUMC+: DA BV AIOS Radiologie (8), RS: GROW - R3 - Innovative Cancer Diagnostics & Therapy, Maastro clinic, and KNO
- Subjects
INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS ,STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY ,RESECTION ,Koos ,General Medicine ,Reliability ,Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] ,Validity ,Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10] ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,Vestibular schwannoma ,Individualized patient care ,Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 15] ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Patient centered care ,Rare cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 9] - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 291966.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) OBJECTIVE: Vestibular schwannoma (VS) growth of ≥2 mm during serial MRI observation, irrespective of size, is the benchmark for treatment initiation in almost all centers. Although the probability of less optimal outcomes significantly increases in VS closer to the brainstem, early intervention does not improve long-term quality of life. Moving beyond the recommendation of definitive treatment for all VS after detected growth, we subclassified Koos 2 tumors based on extrameatal extension and relation to the brainstem. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Koos 2 subclassification's validity and the inter-and intra-rater reliability of the entire Koos classification. METHODS: Six experts, including neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists and radiologists from two tertiary referral centers, classified 43 VS MRI scans. Validity of the Koos 2 subclassification was evaluated by the percentage agreement against the multidisciplinary skull base tumor board management advice. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Validity was almost perfect in Koos 2a VSs with a 100% agreement and 87.5% agreement for Koos 2b. Inter-rater reliability for all Koos grades was significantly excellent (ICC 0.91; 95%CI 0.866 to 0.944, p= 0.90; p=
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF