101. МІСЦЕ МОВИ В СИМВОЛІЧНОМУ ОБМІНІ ЗГІДНО З УЯВЛЕННЯМИ ЖАНА БОДРІЙЯРА
- Author
-
Andrii Anatoliyovich Holovko
- Subjects
Philosophy ,B1-5802 ,Sign (semiotics) ,Referent ,Object (philosophy) ,Code (semiotics) ,Epistemology ,симулякр, знак, код, неможливий обмін, сингулярність ,The Symbolic ,Linguistic philosophy ,Philosophy (General) ,Relation (history of concept) ,Value (semiotics) ,Political science - Abstract
The definition of language and its relation to objects is a persistent problem of contemporary philosophical thought. This paper is an attempt to single out and to reconstruct the linguistical and semiological concepts from the rich body of work of modern French philosopher Jean Baudrillard. Given topic of study is relevant due to lack of research in J. Baudrillard’s linguistic philosophy, and such research can be further used as an effective model of the analysis of social and linguistic phenomena in modern society. J. Baudrillard’s theory of simulation originates from observation of changes to linguistic signs that keep their referentiality but at the same time lose their connection to referent. The exclusion of referent from the relations of signifier and signified within the linguistic theory of value marks the loss of ontological basis for signification. For Baudrillard, two main reasons of this change are forgery of reference and European poetic language as the beginning of the symbolic exchange revolution. The code becomes the dominant mode of relationship between the sign and the object, subordinating the sphere of signifiers to itself. Symbolic exchange mutates the sign so it becomes dual with its referent on the basis of the logic of difference as radical otherness. In Baudrillard’s philosophical system, code appears as one of the most important features of simulation, a substantial basis for difference and a unified correlation of its elements which allows the system to develop. The opposite to differential relations is a framework of impossible exchange, which main feature is singularity of signs as inconceivable and untranslatable origin. The singularity becomes its own event and does not enter into a relationship of difference, it becomes a unique sign, or a sign without content.
- Published
- 2021