Search

A class of multivariate calibration methods called augmented classical least squares (ACLS) has been proposed which combines an explicit linear additive model with the predictive power of inverse models, such as principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares (PLS). Because of its use of the explicit linear additive model, ACLS provides an interesting framework to incorporate different sources of prior information, such as measured pure component spectra, in the model. In this study, the predictive power of ACLS models incorporating different amounts of prior information has been compared to that of PCR and PLS using two examples, a designed experiment and one with biological samples. In both cases, the ACLS models showed predictive power comparable to PLS under idealized validation conditions. When a different interferent structure was present in the validation samples, the predictive power of the inverse models (PCR and PLS) dramatically decreased, with an increase in root-mean-squared error of prediction by a factor of 3.5 for the first example and a factor of 2 in the second example. The incorporation of prior information in the ACLS framework was found to considerably reduce or even completely remove these dramatic effects, especially when the pure component contributions for the interferents were taken into account.

Optical measurement of fruit quality is challenging due to the presence of a skin around the fruit flesh and the multiple scattering by the structured tissues. To gain insight in the light-tissue interaction, the optical properties of apple skin and flesh tissue are estimated in the 350-2200 nm range for three cultivars. For this purpose, single integrating sphere measurements are combined with inverse adding-doubling. The observed absorption coefficient spectra are dominated by water in the near infrared and by pigments and chlorophyll in the visible region, whose concentrations are much higher in skin tissue. The scattering coefficient spectra show the monotonic decrease with increasing wavelength typical for biological tissues with skin tissue being approximately three times more scattering than flesh tissue. Comparison to the values from time-resolved spectroscopy reported in literature showed comparable profiles for the optical properties, but overestimation of the absorption coefficient values, due to light losses. OCIS codes: 290.7050, 300.1030, 290.0290, 290.4210, 300.6340, 300.6550.