Search

Summary: Cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury and neurocognitive disorders, including delirium. Intra‐operative inflammation and/or impaired tissue perfusion/oxygenation are thought to be contributors to these outcomes. It has been hypothesised that these problems may be ameliorated by the highly selective α2‐agonist, dexmedetomidine. We tested the effects of dexmedetomidine on renal and cerebral microcirculatory tissue perfusion, oxygenation and histology in a clinically relevant ovine model. Sixteen sheep were studied while conscious, after induction of anaesthesia and during 2 h of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eight sheep were allocated randomly to receive an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.4–0.8 μg.kg‐1.h‐1) from induction of anaesthesia to the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and eight to receive an equivalent volume of matched placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). Commencement of cardiopulmonary bypass decreased renal medullary tissue oxygenation in the placebo group (mean (95%CI) 5.96 (4.24–7.23) to 1.56 (0.84–2.09) kPa, p = 0.001), with similar hypoxic levels observed in the dexmedetomidine group (6.33 (5.33–7.07) to 1.51 (0.33–2.39) kPa, p = 0.002). While no differences in kidney function (i.e. reduced creatinine clearance) were evident, a greater incidence of histological renal tubular injury was observed in sheep receiving dexmedetomidine (7/8 sheep) compared with placebo (2/8 sheep), p = 0.041. Graded on a semi‐quantitative scale (0–3), median (IQR [range]) severity of histological renal tubular injury was higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with placebo (1.5 (1–2 [0–3]) vs. 0 (0–0.3 [0–1]) respectively, p = 0.013). There was no difference in cerebral tissue microglial activation (neuroinflammation) between the groups. Dexmedetomidine did not reduce renal medullary hypoxia or cerebral neuroinflammation in sheep undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jean Rankin,1 Lynsay Matthews,2 Stephen Cobley,3 Ahreum Han,3 Ross Sanders,3 Huw D Wiltshire,4 Julien S Baker5 1Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, 2MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland; 3Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 4Cardiff School of Sport/Ysgol Chwaraeon Caerdydd, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK; 5School of Science and Sport, Institute of Clinical Exercise and Health Science, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, Scotland Abstract: Childhood obesity is one of the most serious public health challenges of the 21st century with far-reaching and enduring adverse consequences for health outcomes. Over 42 million children

Muhammad Aziz Rahman,1,2 Andrew M Wilson,2–4 Rhonda Sanders,3 David Castle,2–4 Karen Daws,3 David R Thompson,2 Chantal F Ski,2 Sarah Matthews,3 Christine Wright,2 Linda Worrall-Carter1–31St Vincent's Centre for Nursing Research (SVCNR), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2The Cardiovascular Research Centre (CvRC), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 3St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 4The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaBackground: A cross-sectional study was conducted to provide a snapshot of smoking behavior among staff and patients at a major metropolitan hospital in Melbourne.Methods: Patients and staff were surveyed using a questionnaire exploring demographics, nicotine dependence (Fagerstrom test), readiness to quit, and preference for smoking cessation options.Results: A total of 1496 people were screened within 2 hours; 1,301 participated (1,100 staff, 199 patients). Mean age was 42 years, 68% were female. There were 113 (9%) current smokers and 326 (25%) ex-smokers. Seven percent of the staff were current smokers compared with 19% of the patients. The Fagerstrom test showed that 47% of patients who smoked were moderately nicotine dependent compared with 21% of staff. A third of the staff who smoked did not anticipate health problems related to smoking. Most patients (79%) who smoked disagreed that their current health problems were related to smoking. Although more than half of the current smokers preferred pharmacotherapy, one in two of them did not prefer behavior counseling; with consistent results among staff and patients. Multivariate analyses showed that patients were three times more likely (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9–4.7) to smoke than staff.Conclusion: This study reports lower prevalence of smoking among hospital staff compared with national data. It also indicates an under-appreciation of health effects of smoking, and a preference not to use conventional methods of quitting.Keywords: tobacco, smoking, health, cross-sectional study, prevalence