Search

Objective: To evaluate seroreactivity and disease flares after COVID‐19 vaccination in a multiethnic/multiracial cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Ninety SLE patients and 20 healthy controls receiving a complete COVID‐19 vaccine regimen were included. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS–CoV‐2 spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD) and SARS–CoV‐2 microneutralization were used to evaluate B cell responses; interferon‐γ (IFNγ) production was measured by enzyme‐linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay in order to assess T cell responses. Disease activity was measured by the hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and flares were identified according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment–SLEDAI flare index. Results: Overall, fully vaccinated SLE patients produced significantly lower IgG antibodies against SARS–CoV‐2 spike RBD compared to fully vaccinated controls. Twenty‐six SLE patients (28.8%) generated an IgG response below that of the lowest control (<100 units/ml). In logistic regression analyses, the use of any immunosuppressant or prednisone and a normal anti–double‐stranded DNA antibody level prior to vaccination were associated with decreased vaccine responses. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS–CoV‐2 spike RBD strongly correlated with the SARS–CoV‐2 microneutralization titers and correlated with antigen‐specific IFNγ production determined by ELISpot. In a subset of patients with poor antibody responses, IFNγ production was similarly diminished. Pre‐ and postvaccination SLEDAI scores were similar in both groups. Postvaccination flares occurred in 11.4% of patients; 1.3% of these were severe. Conclusion: In a multiethnic/multiracial study of SLE patients, 29% had a low response to the COVID‐19 vaccine which was associated with receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Reassuringly, severe disease flares were rare. While minimal protective levels remain unknown, these data suggest that protocol development is needed to assess the efficacy of booster vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the association of biologic therapy use for psoriasis with incident psoriatic arthritis (PsA) diagnosis.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the OptumInsights Electronic Health Record Database between 2006 and 2017 among patients with psoriasis between the ages of 16 and 90 initiating a therapy for psoriasis (oral, biologic or phototherapy). The incidence of PsA was calculated within each therapy group. Multivariable Cox models were used to calculate the HR for biologic versus oral or phototherapy using biologics as a time-varying exposure and next in a propensity score-matched cohort.Results: Among 1 93 709 patients with psoriasis without PsA, 14 569 biologic and 20 321 cumulative oral therapy and phototherapy initiations were identified. Mean age was lower among biologic initiators compared with oral/phototherapy initiators (45.9 vs 49.8). The incidence of PsA regardless of therapy exposure was 9.75 per 1000 person-years compared with 77.26 among biologic users, 61.99 among oral therapy users, 26.11 among phototherapy users and 5.85 among those without a prescription for one of the target therapies. Using a multivariable adjustment approach with time-varying exposure, adjusted HR (95% CI) for biologic users was 4.48 (4.23 to 4.75) compared with oral or phototherapy users. After propensity score matching, the HR (95% CI) was 2.14 (2.00 to 2.28).Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, biologic use was associated with the development of PsA among patients with psoriasis. This may be related to confounding by indication and protopathic bias. Prospective studies are needed to address this important question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Physical function is a core outcome in PsA. We examined the construct validity and responsiveness of three commonly used instruments to assess physical function in PsA: HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI), MultiDimensional HAQ (MDHAQ) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Global-10. Methods Between 2016 and 2019, patients with PsA were enrolled in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium longitudinal cohort study in the USA. Correlations were calculated at baseline and among change scores using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Standardized response means were calculated. Agreement with the 20% improvement cut-off was used to determine the potential effect of using MDHAQ or the PROMIS Global-10 physical health (GPH) subscore in place of HAQ-DI when assessing the ACR20. Results A total of 274 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 49 years and 51% were male. At baseline, the mean HAQ-DI was 0.6 (s. d. 0.6; range 0–3), the mean MDHAQ was 1.8 (s. d. 1.6; range 0–10) and the mean GPH T-score was 43.4 (s. d. 9.3; range 0–100). All three instruments were strongly correlated at baseline (rho 0.75–0.85). Change scores were moderately correlated (rho 0.42–0.71). Among therapy initiators, the mean change between two visits in HAQ-DI, MDHAQ and GPH was −0.1 (s. d. 0.4), −0.2 (s. d. 1.2) and 2.5 (s. d. 6.1), respectively. The standardized response means were 0.18, 0.16 and 0.41, respectively. Conclusion The three instruments tested are not directly interchangeable but have overall similar levels of responsiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To characterize the hospitalization and death rates among patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and to analyze the associations of comorbidities and immunomodulatory medications with infection outcomes. Methods: Data on clinical and demographic features, maintenance treatment, disease course, and outcomes in individuals with IA (rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis) with symptomatic COVID‐19 infection were prospectively assessed via web‐based questionnaire followed by individual phone calls and electronic medical record review. Baseline characteristics and medication use were summarized for hospitalized and ambulatory patients, and outcomes with the different medication classes were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 103 patients with IA were included in the study (80 with confirmed COVID‐19 and 23 with high suspicion of COVID‐19). Hospitalization was required in 26% of the participants, and 4% died. Patients who were hospitalized were significantly more likely to be older (P < 0.001) and have comorbid hypertension (P = 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.02). IA patients taking oral glucocorticoids had an increased likelihood of being admitted for COVID‐19 (P < 0.001), while those receiving maintenance anticytokine biologic therapies did not. Conclusion: Among patients with underlying IA, COVID‐19 outcomes were worse in those receiving glucocorticoids but not in patients receiving maintenance anticytokine therapy. Further work is needed to understand whether immunomodulatory therapies affect COVID‐19 incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To characterize patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and to analyze associations of comorbidities and medications on infection outcomes. Methods: Patients with SLE and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID‐19 were identified through an established New York University lupus cohort, query of 2 hospital systems, and referrals from rheumatologists. Data were prospectively collected via a web‐based questionnaire and review of medical records. Data on baseline characteristics were obtained for all patients with COVID‐19 to analyze risk factors for hospitalization. Data were also collected on asymptomatic patients and those with COVID‐19–like symptoms who tested negative or were not tested. Statistical analyses were limited to confirmed COVID‐19–positive patients. Results: A total of 226 SLE patients were included: 41 with confirmed COVID‐19, 19 who tested negative for COVID‐19, 42 with COVID‐19–like symptoms who did not get tested, and 124 who remained asymptomatic without testing. Of the SLE patients with confirmed COVID‐19, hospitalization was required in 24 (59%) and intensive care unit–level of care in 4, and 4 died. Hospitalized patients tended to be older, nonwhite, Hispanic, have higher body mas index (BMI), history of nephritis, and at least 1 comorbidity. An exploratory (due to limited sample size) logistic regression analysis identified race, presence of at least 1 comorbidity, and BMI as independent predictors of hospitalization. Conclusion: In general, the variables predictive of hospitalization in our SLE patients were similar to those identified in the general population. Further studies are needed to understand additional risk factors for poor COVID‐19 outcomes in patients with SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past three decades, extraordinary advances have been made in the understanding of the pathogenesis of, and treatment options for, inflammatory arthritides, including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. The use of methotrexate and subsequently biologic therapies (such as TNF inhibitors, among others) and oral small molecules have substantially improved clinical outcomes for many patients with inflammatory arthritis; for others, however, these agents do not substantially improve their symptoms. The emerging field of pharmacomicrobiomics, which investigates the effect of variations within the human gut microbiome on drugs, has already provided important insights into these therapeutics. Pharmacomicrobiomic studies have demonstrated that human gut microorganisms and their enzymatic products can affect the bioavailability, clinical efficacy and toxicity of a wide array of drugs through direct and indirect mechanisms. This discipline promises to facilitate the advent of microbiome-based precision medicine approaches in inflammatory arthritis, including strategies for predicting response to treatment and for modulating the microbiome to improve response to therapy or reduce drug toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In these studies, we examined the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the IL1RN gene with radiographic severity of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (SKOA) and the risk of incident OA. We also explored these genetic polymorphisms in patients with new onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods: Over 1000 subjects who met American College of Rheumatology criteria for tibiofemoral OA were selected from three independent, National Institute of Health (NIH)-funded cohorts. CTA and TTG haplotypes formed from three SNPs of the IL1RN gene (rs419598, rs315952, rs9005) were assessed for association with radiographic severity, and risk for incident radiographic OA (rOA) in a nested case-control cohort. These IL1RN haplotypes were also assessed for association with disease activity (DAS28) and plasma inflammatory markers in patients with RA.Results: Carriage of the IL1RN TTG haplotype was associated with increased odds of more severe rOA compared with age-matched, sex-matched and body mass index-matched individuals. Examination of the osteoarthritis initiative Incidence Subcohort demonstrated that carriage of the TTG haplotype was associated with 4.1-fold (p=0.001) increased odds of incident rOA. Plasma IL-1Ra levels were lower in TTG carriers, while chondrocytes from TTG carriers exhibited decreased secretion of IL-1Ra. In patients with RA, the TTG haplotype was associated with increased DAS28, decreased plasma IL-1Ra and elevations of plasma inflammatory markers (hsCRP, interleukin 6 (IL-6)).Conclusion: Carriage of the IL1RN TTG haplotype is associated with more severe rOA, increased risk for incident OA, and increased evidence of inflammation in RA. These data suggest that the IL1RN TTG risk haplotype, associated with decreased IL-1Ra plasma levels, impairs endogenous 'anti-inflammatory' mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: The therapeutic response to biologic agents in psoriasis is significantly higher than observed in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this review, specific actions to improve treatment outcomes in PsA are discussed. Recent Findings: Increased understanding of disease pathogenesis derived from improved preclinical models and advances in cell-based and molecular technologies provide new tools to identify therapeutic targets. In addition to the important contributions of metabolic comorbidities, chronic pain and the lack of a diagnostic biomarker signal the need for new strategies to improve outcomes. Potential strategies include the following: (1) discover a novel pathway or cellular subset, (2) apply stratification biomarkers to individualize therapy, (3) preclinical intervention, (4) combination therapy, (5) lifestyle modification, (6) address chronic pain and fatigue, and (7) multidisciplinary care. Summary: The future holds great promise for enhanced treatment responses in PsA based on improved understanding of individual variation in disease pathophysiology coupled with comprehensive and integrated treatment programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]