Search

Skin testing is the diagnostic cornerstone for allergies and is considered extremely safe. It is usually performed with the prick and the prick-to-prick method. The aim of this study is to report the first two pediatric cases of systemic allergic reactions during skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial food allergens. Both patients had a history of fish allergy. A 5-year-old girl, with a history of atopic dermatitis and asthma, reported an episode of urticaria and angioedema due to ingestion of fish, which had occurred 2 years before consultation. Ten minutes after having completed SPT to fish extracts, which had resulted positive, she suffered from generalized pruritus, nausea, stomach pain, and loss of consciousness. A 9-year-old boy, with a history of asthma and two episodes of acute urticaria and angioedema upon eating fish during infancy, reported a recent episode of oropharyngeal pruritus after tasting salmon. He was evaluated for fish allergy with SPT but developed conjunctivitis and acute urticaria during the first 10 min of the test. Anaphylaxis appears to be a rare side effect of skin testing in pediatric patients. Children with a history of asthma and atopic dermatitis are more likely to react.

Skin testing is a common procedure in any clinical setting. Critical care nurses will encounter skin testing in the inpatient and outpatient settings primarily to test for patient allergies to environmental factors, or allergies to certain medications. As there is a great deal of controversy about standard practices surrounding the different tests, information about various allergy tests and testing protocols is vital. Quality assurance standards should be met to ensure adequacy of the skin testing technique. Persons performing skin tests should undergo evaluation of their technique. To improve the predictive values of skin testing, and to ameliorate the incidence or severity of adverse affects, it is important for the critical care nurse to understand the dynamics of the test and the possible risks, along with variables that can confound the results. By doing this, nurses will improve not only patient outcomes related to the testing itself but also the value and reliability of the most effective diagnostic tool available for allergic disease., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: All iodinated radiocontrast media (RCM) may cause hypersensitivity reactions, either immediate-type within 5-10 min of RCM injection or delayed-type, which become apparent more than 1h after RCM exposure. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to RCM may pose a problem for future radiologic investigations because due to possible immunological cross-reactivity all iodinated RCM are usually avoided., Objective: The aim of this study was not only to identify the causal RCM for the exanthema but also to demonstrate that patients may receive alternative iodinated RCM despite a history of RCM-induced allergic exanthema., Methods: We evaluated 32 patients with a history of exanthema after RCM application using standardized patch, prick and intradermal skin testing. In case of positive skin tests intravenous challenges with skin-test-negative RCM were performed to identify non-ionic monomer RCM which are tolerated., Results: In 6 out of 32 patients skin tests strongly suggested a delayed-type non-IgE-mediated allergic hypersensitivity to the RCM iomeprol (3x), iopromide (2x), and iopamidol. In 4 patients alternative non-ionic monomer RCM (2x iosarcol, iopromide, and iomeprol) were identified by controlled challenge tests., Conclusions: The evaluation of patients with RCM-associated exanthema should always include appropriate skin tests ensuring that patients with a delayed-type allergic RCM-induced exanthema are not missed. Moreover, allergologic testing may identify alternative RCM of the group of non-ionic monomers, which are tolerated in future radiologic investigations.

Skin testing is a reliable and safe way to diagnose IgE-mediated allergies, with rare side-effects. Two cases of systemic allergic reactions during skin testing to food allergens are hereby reported. A 28-year-old male reported allergic reactions, mild to moderate in severity, each time he tasted fish in the frame of his professional duties. During SPT and prick-to-prick to raw and cooked fishes, he presented urticaria and tachycardia. A 59-year-old male had a long history of urticaria-angioedema and asthma attacks, following the consumption of mammalian meat. He was skin-tested to various meats and during the 5 last minutes of the test he developed generalized urticaria, allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis. They were both advised to completely avoid the relative allergens. In conclusion, skin testing, particularly prick-to-prick, may cause anaphylaxis. Tests should be performed only by physicians with proper training in allergy, experienced in treating promptly and properly episodes of anaphylaxis.

Skin prick test (SPT) is usually considered to be a safe procedure, but recently there have been occasional case reports of generalized allergic reactions. This study was performed to delineate the prevalence of, and evaluate possible risk factors for, adverse reactions to SPT in a prospective study. Altogether 5,908 patients aged < or =18 yr from 11 different pediatric settings were included. The adverse reactions were classified into two groups: (1) Generalized allergic reactions (GAR), (2) Vasovagal reactions (VVR). Adverse reactions were observed in 14 out of 5,908 children examined with SPT. Seven of the adverse reactions were GARs and required medication, yielding a 0.12% risk for GAR. Seven of 14 were VVRs, giving the same risk, 0.12%. Identified risk factors for GAR were low age (<1 yr) (RR 6.28) and active eczema (RR 16.98). For VVR, the risk factors were female sex (RR 7.32) and multiple skin pricks performed on a single patient (p < 0.05). We conclude that GARs do occur, albeit rarely, so the need for proper emergency handling should always be acknowledged. The risk factors suggested may help to identify patients who need extra attention.

Aim: The goal of this study was to investigate a possible relationship between allergic symptoms, atopy skin prick test results in type 1 diabetic patients and in non diabetic controls., Methods: 50 type 1 diabetic patients and 50 healthy control subjects were evaluated for allergic disorders with regard to medical history. All persons were skin-prick-tested for atopic sensitization with a common panel of inhalant and food allergens., Results: Although in the diabetic group 56% of the patients reported allergy-like respiratory symptoms, only 22% were found to have positive skin tests. In the control group 22% had allergic complaints and skin prick tests were positive in 34% of the cases., Conclusion: Nasal and bronchial allergy-like symptoms were increased in IDDM patients in comparison to a control population. However there was a small decrease (not significant) in prevalence of positive atopy skin tests in diabetic patients in comparison to controls. This suggests that IDDM patients have an important load of allergy-like symptoms that are not linked to an IgE sensitization.

The intended purpose of this monograph is to provide a general overview of allergy diagnostics for health care professionals who care for patients with allergic disease. For a more comprehensive review of allergy diagnostic testing, readers can refer to the Allergy Diagnostic Practice Parameters. A key message is that a positive allergy test result (skin or blood) indicates only the presence of allergen specific IgE (called sensitization). It does not necessarily mean clinical allergy (ie, allergic symptoms with exposure). It is important for this reason that the allergy evaluation be based on the patient's history and directed by a health care professional with sufficient understanding of allergy diagnostic testing to use the information obtained from his/her evaluation of the patient to determine (1) what allergy diagnostic tests to order, (2) how to interpret the allergy diagnostic test results, and (3) how to use the information obtained from the allergy evaluation to develop an appropriate therapeutic treatment plan.

Background: Data on the frequency of resolution of anaphylaxis to foods are not available, but such resolution is generally assumed to be rare., Objective: To determine whether the frequency of negative challenge tests in children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods is frequent enough to warrant challenge testing to re-evaluate the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, and to document the safety of this procedure., Methods: All children (n=441) who underwent a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) between January 2003 and March 2007 were screened for symptoms of anaphylaxis to food by history. Anaphylaxis was defined as symptoms and signs of cardiovascular instability, occurring within 2 h after ingestion of the suspected food., Results: Twenty-one children were enrolled (median age 6.1 years, range 0.8-14.4). The median time interval between the most recent anaphylactic reaction and the DBPCFC was 4.25 years, range 0.3-12.8. Twenty-one DBPCFCs were performed in 21 children. Eighteen of 21 children were sensitized to the food in question. Six DBPCFCs were negative (29%): three for cows milk, one for egg, one for peanut, and one for wheat. In the positive DBPCFCs, no severe reactions occurred, and epinephrine administration was not required., Conclusions: This is the first study using DBPCFCs in a consecutive series of children with a history of anaphylaxis to foods, and no indications in dietary history that the food allergy had been resolved. Our study shows that in such children having specific IgE levels below established cut-off levels reported in other studies predicting positive challenge outcomes, re-evaluation of clinical reactivity to food by DBPCFC should be considered, even when there are no indications in history that anaphylaxis has resolved. DBPCFCs can be performed safely in these children, although there is a potential risk for severe reactions.

Objective: To provide an overview of the role of intradermal skin testing (IDST) in inhalant allergy., Data Sources: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed articles related to IDST using the following keywords: skin testing, intradermal, intracutaneous, aeroallergen, and inhalant allergen. In addition, references cited within these articles were also reviewed., Study Selection: Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic., Results: The use of IDST for inhalant allergy varies widely among allergists. When performed, it is necessary to use a 100- to 1,000-fold dilution from the stock allergen extract. IDST is used routinely in the standardization of extracts in the United States. With a negative skin prick test result, a positive IDST result has low agreement with in vitro and challenge results and generally adds little to the diagnostic evaluation. In contrast, a negative IDST result generally has a high negative predictive value. Only a few inhalant allergens have been evaluated with challenge models for IDST. A summary of the data is also presented in tabular form., Conclusions: Most of the literature suggests that with a negative skin prick test result, a positive IDST result adds little to the diagnostic evaluation of inhalant allergy. However, additional studies are necessary using challenge models for less potent and nonstandardized inhalant allergens (molds, trees, dog, weeds).

Background: Most patients who require skin prick testing cannot deal with their pruritus without taking antihistamines (AH). Orally administered AH has a quick onset of action, but it will suppress skin test responses (STR) from several days to weeks. In this study, we aimed to determine the onset and duration of action of single topical AH application by observing histamine-STR suppression over time., Methods: A two-step, randomized, intraindividual parallel-comparative, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on the volar side of the forearm. Step 1 was aimed to determine the onset, while step 2 determined the duration of action. The topical AH tested was a single application of 5% doxepin hydrochloride cream, while 10 mg/ml histamine dihydrochloride was used to test the skin responses., Results: Our 10 subjects' mean age was 35.8 +/- 3.179 years. Histamine wheal response was suppressed starting on minute 90 and the wheal width were back to >/= 7 mm(2 )on minute 270. Significant histamine reactivity difference between genders (P = 0.201) and atopic status (P = 1.000), which could be a source of bias in histamine STR, was not found among our subjects., Conclusion: Single application of topical AH has an onset of action in 90 min and duration of action < 180 min. Because of its short duration of action, topical AH can be used in a patient who needs AH but is scheduled to undergo skin prick testing after a few hours, without influencing the patient's STR.

Limited specificity of the tuberculin skin test incited the development of in vitro assays based on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens such as ESAT-6 that are lacking in Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG). In animal studies, intradermal ESAT-6 was safe and induced specific skin test responses. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of intradermal recombinant dimer ESAT-6 (rdESAT-6) compared with tuberculin and to determine the human dose. The study design was a double-blind Phase I study with intra-subject randomization to the left and right forearm, comparing 2 Tuberculin Units (TU) intradermal tuberculin (RT23) with 0.01, 0.1, 1 or 10 microg rdESAT-6 in groups of five healthy controls or treated tuberculosis (TB) patients. The risk of sensitization after skin testing was assessed in healthy volunteers. All doses were tolerated well by healthy volunteers and responses to rdESAT-6 were limited to transient redness after 24 h only at the highest dose. No sensitization was observed. Because 1 microg rdESAT-6 induced large responses with local side effects in some TB patients, the 10 microg dose of rdESAT-6 was not tested. Mean responses to 0.01, 0.1 and 1 microg rdESAT-6 measured 14.0, 19.8 and 38.8 mm of redness, respectively, and 7.0, 13.4 and 14.6 mm of induration. The response to tuberculin was similar to the responses to 0.1 microg rdESAT-6. Mild local side effects due to tuberculin and rdESAT-6 were observed in 8/15, respectively, 6/15 patients, more pronounced at the highest rdESAT-6 dose. In conclusion, this pilot Phase I study of safety, feasibility and dose finding of intradermal rdESAT-6 provides proof of principle of a specific skin test for human use. No serious adverse events were observed but the study was not sufficiently powered to demonstrate complete safety. Intradermal rdESAT-6 did not seem to sensitize healthy volunteers. In treated TB patients, responses to rdESAT-6 were optimal at 0.1 microg. Further studies are needed to evaluate sensitization after repeated doses and to study the effect of additional CFP-10 on the sensitivity of a TB-specific skin test.

Background: Immunotherapy is the only curative treatment recommended for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, in which small amounts of allergen are administered sublingually or subcutaneously until the maximum tolerated dose has been reached. However, local or systemic adverse reactions (AR) -rarely even fatal- an occur. In Mexico there is no nationwide data on adverse reactions., Objective: To document the frequency of adverse reactions secondary to skin tests (ST) or immunotherapy (IT) in the allergist's office in Mexico, paying special attention to fatal and near fatal allergic reactions., Participants and Methods: We mailed a survey to all members of the Mexican Colleges of Allergy (CMICA) and Pediatric Allergy (CoMPedIA)., Results: A response rate of 59 (16%) for the adverse reactions part of the questionnaire was obtained from the College members. We found a near fatal reaction rate of 0.005 cases per year per allergy practice for skin testing and the same number -0.005 cases- for immunotherapy. This can be extrapolated to a total of 1.5 cases per year in the whole country of Mexico. No fatalities were reported., Conclusions: In Mexico the frequency of severe or near fatal adverse reactions to immunotherapy or skin tests is low and no fatal case has been reported till today.

The skin is an organ most often affected by adverse drug reactions. Because of limited reactivity of the skin, different drugs may induce the same reactions on the skin, even if the same drug may induce different adverse drug reactions. Many of these adverse drug reactions do not include immunological mechanisms, most of them are non-immunological processes. Adverse drug reactions which involve an immune system, may appear different times after drug administration. The severity of reactions is not dependent on the time at which adverse drug reaction appeared, even if some life threatening adverse drug reactions appear immediately after a drug administration. Four types of immunological reactions, (according to Cooms and Gell), may be involved in a drug adverse reaction. The first type of reaction (anaphylactic reaction) begins early after drug administration and different severities of the reactions could exist. The second type, known as cytotoxic hypersensitivity, begins after some minutes to a few hours after a drug administration. Third and fourth types of immunological reactions begin usually hours to days after drug administration. Some types of immunological reactions may begin days to weeks after drug administration. Sensitization to the drugs must be happen early, since re-exposition to the drug leads to the adverse drug reactions. The way of sensitization sometimes determines which immune mechanism will be involved and which clinical reaction will appear. Tests in vivo and in vitro can be used in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. All these tests are more or less limited to a false positive or false negative reaction and possibilities of serious reactions in tests. Provocations tests give the most satisfactory results but they may be dangerous and life threatening. We must carefully choose the skin tests and apply them according to the suspected pathomechanism of adverse drug reaction geneses and estimate the usefulness and the risks of the tests. Serious adverse drug reactions (i.e. Sy Steven-Johnson, lupus-like disease etc.) should not be tested. Some novel patents will have important implications in administration, diagnosis, and prevention of adverse drug reactions.

Purpose: This pilot study describes pain and anxiety associated with allergy testing; tests distraction, specifically self-selected distraction; and examines the relationship between pain, anxiety, and engagement with distraction., Design and Methods: An experimental design was used with a convenience sample of 32 adolescents from an allergist's office randomly assigned to three groups. Pain was measured by the adolescent pediatric pain tool (APPT) and FACES scale., Results: No differences in pain ratings were found among the groups. Less pain was associated with lower anxiety and greater engagement with distraction. Greater engagement with distraction occurred with less anxiety., Practice Implications: Knowledge about allergy testing pain, anxiety, and engagement with distraction can assist nurses in preparing adolescents for this procedure.

Background: Parents of atopic children frequently report, and are alarmed by, contact reactions to foods. Some schools restrict foods due to concerns regarding possible systemic reactions following contact in allergic children., Objective: We aimed to determine the frequency with which peanut-sensitive children exhibited contact sensitivity to peanut butter and to assess the significance of such reactions., Methods: One gram of peanut butter was applied directly to the skin of 281 children who were skin prick test (SPT) positive to peanut (immediate skin application food test; I-SAFT). The test was considered positive if one or more weals were present when the patch was removed after 15 min. A subset of children then underwent an open-label oral challenge with graded amounts of peanut protein., Results: During 3515 clinic visits, 330 I-SAFT tests for peanut contact sensitivity were performed; 136 (41%) were positive. The mean SPT diameter was 10 mm in the I-SAFT-positive children and 8.5 mm in the I-SAFT-negative children (t-test, P<0.0001). No child had a systemic reaction following topical application of peanut butter. Eighty-four children had 85 oral challenges after blinded, placebo-controlled I-SAFT testing. Challenge was positive in 26/32 of those with a positive I-SAFT and negative in only 6/32. Challenge was also positive in 26/53 but negative in 27/53 of those with a negative I-SAFT (sensitivity 50%, specificity 82%, chi2, P=0.003)., Conclusion: A minority of children sensitized to peanut (positive SPT) develop localized urticaria from prolonged skin contact with peanut butter. No tested subjects, including ones with systemic reactions upon oral challenge, developed a systemic reaction to prolonged skin exposure to peanut. Therefore, systemic reactions resulting from this mode of contact with peanut butter appear highly unlikely.

Background: Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones are commonly used in patients with a history of penicillin allergy., Objective: To determine the safety and utility of penicillin skin testing (PST)., Methods: Retrospective study of patients with a history of penicillin allergy between April 1, 1999, and September 30, 2004. Penicillin skin testing was performed by means of standard methods using benzylpenicilloyl-polysine, penicillin G, and histamine and saline controls., Results: Of 596 patients studied, 25.3% were outpatients, 50.3% were inpatients, and 24.3% were intensive care unit patients. The most common antibiotics used during the time of PST were vancomycin and fluoroquinolones. Results of PST were negative in 88.4% of patients, positive in 8.2%, and indeterminate in 3.4%. One patient (0.17%) developed urticaria immediately after PST. Fifty-five percent of patients with negative PST results were changed to a beta-lactam drug, more frequently in the intensive care unit vs the outpatient setting (70.3% vs 8.6%; P < .001) and in adults vs patients younger than 18 years (58.6% vs 8.1%; P < .001). A beta-lactam antibiotic was used in 290 patients with negative PST results. Of the patients given beta-lactam antibiotics, 5 (1.7%) had adverse reactions: 2 had hives after 16 and 20 days of therapy, 1 had a nonspecific rash after 17 days of therapy, 1 had flushing and urticaria 3 hours after a test dose of piperacillin-tazobactam, and 1 had a pruritic rash after 12 hours of therapy., Conclusions: Patients with a history of penicillin allergy can safely use beta-lactam drugs if negative PST results.

The skin prick test (SPT) is a simple and fast method used routinely in allergology practice. Systemic reactions have been described with this technique on few occasions. We are presenting a case of anaphylaxis with hemodynamic consequences after carrying out skin prick test with a cat dander extract. A 23 years old female who suffered rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma following contact with cats. We performed skin prick test with a battery of the usual inhalants. Twenty minutes after carrying out the prick test the patient showed intense ocular irritation and reddening followed by dysphonia and a feeling of pharyngeal occupation. Although skin prick test is a safe diagnostic approach, it should be performed only in places equipped to treat anaphylaxis and for trained specialists .

Allergic reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics have been reported frequently and may occur because of sensitization to unique haptens or to determinants shared with other drugs. A woman who received 1 tablet of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid developed wheals and flares although she had previously tolerated the same preparation well. Levels of specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E to penicillin V, penicillin G, amoxicillin, and ampicillin were undetectable. Skin tests to amoxicillin, penicillin major determinant and minor determinant mixture were negative. The patient tolerated oral challenge with 500 mg of amoxicillin but developed wheals and flares when challenged with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 500/125 mg. A histamine release test was negative with amoxicillin but positive with the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and clavulanic acid. A prick test to the combination was positive. Specific IgE to penicillin V later became positive while remaining negative to other beta-lactams. No inhibition was obtained using penicillin V against clavulanic acid and amoxicillin but was complete when penicillin V was used in the solid-phase and as the inhibitor. No cross-reactivity was proven between these sensitizations.

Background: Autoimmune diseases have been implicated as a cause of intrinsic asthma; however, there is little data on the role of autoimmunity in the pathogenesis of asthma., Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate circulating functional autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI or IgE in patients with asthma., Methods: Twenty-eight patients with asthma and 19 control subjects were included. All subjects were skin tested with autologous serum to assess for the potential presence of receptor FcepsilonRI or IgE autoantibodies. If the serum-induced wheal diameter was 1.5 mm larger than the histamine-induced wheal diameter and that was 3 mm larger than the saline-induced wheal diameter at 30 min, the reaction was defined positive., Results: Of the 47 total subjects (both asthma patients and control subjects), 13 (27.7%) had a positive autologous serum skin test (ASST). Of the 28 asthma patients, 8 (28.6%) were regarded as having autoimmune origin. Autoantibodies against FcepsilonRI or IgE were found in asthma patients, irrespective of atopic status (atopy+ 3/13 vs. atopy- 5/15). The wheal diameter related to ASST was not related to atopy. Asthma patients with ASST-positive results as compared with patients with ASST-negative results exhibited a significant increased airway hyperresponsiveness (PC(20) methacholine, 2.70 +/- 1.27 vs. 9.08 +/- 2.35; p < 0.026)., Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that aberrant autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI or IgE are related to airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma., ((c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The safety and utility of penicillin skin testing (PST) in pregnant women with a history of penicillin allergy and group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization have not been studied., Objective: To document the safety and utility of PST in pregnant women with a history of penicillin allergy and GBS colonization., Methods: Pregnant GBS culture-positive women with a history compatible with an IgE-mediated or unknown reaction to a penicillin-class antibiotic were recruited for PST. If PST results were negative, penicillin-class antibiotics were recommended for GBS prophylaxis. Adverse reactions associated with PST or antibiotic use from the time of PST through delivery and 6 months post partum were reported., Results: In 56 enrolled patients, there were only 2 mild adverse reactions (4%) associated with PST and 3 positive PST results (5%). Of the 53 PST-negative patients, 47 (89%) received at least 1 course of penicillin. There were 2 delayed-onset rashes associated with the use of intrapartum penicillins and 1 immediate-onset rash with intrapartum vancomycin therapy in a PST-positive woman. There were 7 reactions (6%) associated with 122 antibiotic courses administered., Conclusions: Penicillin skin testing can be performed safelyin pregnant women and, if the results are negative, allows penicillins to be used safely at delivery for GBS prophylaxis.

The risk of actively sensitizing a patient in connection with diagnostic patch tests exists. This risk, however, is extremely low, especially from standard allergens, and if the test is carried out according to internationally accepted guidelines. This retrospective study investigates the clinical consequences in cases of possible patch test sensitization. Among 7619 consecutively tested eczema patients in a 14-year period 26 (0.3%) were identified in the database as having had a late patch test reaction, which may be an indication of patch test sensitization. 9 of these cases were not suitable or available for the follow-up investigation and 3 patients were not traceable. Among the 14 remaining patients 1 had a reaction to gold sodium thiosulphate, which was assessed to be a persistent reaction and not a late reaction, and in 2 patients a clear relevance for the late reacting allergen was found. For the remaining 11 patients we could not rule out that they were patch test sensitized, and they were investigated further. 1 was diseased and 10 were interviewed regarding the possible consequences of the alleged patch test sensitization. 9 had not experienced any dermatitis problems, and 1 could not exclude the possibility that the alleged patch test sensitization had aggravated her dermatitis problems, although we find it unlikely based on the full clinical history. Even though the patient material is small and the limitations inherent in such a retrospective study, the results and the literature indicate that development of clinical contact dermatitis following patch test sensitization is very rare.

Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test is a standard tool to assess in vivo cell-mediated immunity. Mantoux method using 4-5 common recalled antigens is recommended. However, not all antigens are widely available and appropriate antigens for tropical countries are not known. The objective of this study is to investigate what and how many antigens should be included in the DTH testing panel that suitable for Thailand and may be for this region. The DTH skin tests were done by Mantoux method in a double blinded fashion. Average induration size of > or = 5 mm defined as a positive test. Antigens included purified protein derivative (PPD), Candida albicans, tetanus toxoid (TT), Trichophyton mentagrophytes and hepatitis B vaccine (HBV). The negative control was normal saline. Of 95 healthy subjects, all showed DTH positive to > or = 1 antigen. The positivity to C. albicans, tetanus toxoid, PPD, T. mentagrophytes, and HBV was 92.6%, 83.2%, 82.1%, 50.5%, and 5.3%, respectively. When three antigens: PPD, TT and C. albicans were analyzed, 100% of subjects showed a positive response to > or = 1 antigen and 96.8% showed a positive response to > or = 2 antigens. When only PPD and TT were analyzed, 100% of subjects showed > or = 1 antigen positive and 68.4% showed both antigens positive. C. albicans antigen at 1:100 was associated with a high incidence of fever (2/20) and large local reaction (7/20), 1:500 was found to be the optimal concentration. PPD, TT and C. albicans are suitable to be included in a DTH skin testing in a tropical country like Thailand. However, in a setting where C. albicans extract is not available, testing with only two antigens of PPD and tetanus toxoid may be an alternative, but with a lower sensitivity.

Background: It has been demonstrated that specific immunotherapy, in addition to its preventive properties, is an effective and safe therapeutic resource for allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis and allergy to insect's venom; however, its use in patients younger than five years has been limited due to the risk of systemic reactions., Objectives: To know the frequency and severity of systemic reactions in children younger than five years and to know if a greater risk of systemic reactions in this group of age is real., Patients and Methods: We included 239 patients from one to five years of age with diagnosis of allergic disease and verified its specific sensitivity with skin tests or RAST and were treated with specific immunotherapy. A detailed registry of the application of specific immunotherapy was kept from every patient, with special attention to any symptom present during the first 30 minutes post application of specific immunotherapy or skin test., Results: From January 1996 to June 2005, 6,689 injections were applied to 239 patients. Only one patient of 36 months of age presented with a delayed systemic reactions characterized by generalized hives, itching, runny nose, water eyes, 90 minutes post injection. The patient was under treatment with Dermatophagoides farinae and pteronissinus (house dust mites) with a dose of 1AU for allergic rhinitis. The systemic reactions were treated easily and without complications with a single dose of intramuscular epinephrine (0.15cc, 1:1000) and oral antihistamine., Conclusion: Patients younger than five years are not in greater risk of systemic reactions from specific immunotherapy or skin tests than the older children or adults and the treatment of those systemic reactions does not imply greater difficulty. Because of its preventive properties, safety and effectiveness in lowering the severity of symptoms of allergic diseases, we concluded that specific immunotherapy should be considered at early age, prescribed and administered only by specialist in pediatric allergy and in optimal conditions of safety.

Allergy skin testing is the primary modality used in the diagnosis of allergic diseases and guides development of treatment and avoidance plans. The goal of the Allergist is to skin test the appropriate population with a device and technique that minimizes pain while maximizing sensitivity and specificity. The debate involving the use of intradermal versus skin-prick testing in the diagnosis of aeroallergy has been long lasting. Past and present medical literature will be reviewed, establishing the lack of diagnostic use of intradermal testing in the setting of aeroallergy. New skin devices continue to be developed with a trend toward production of multidevices. Performance characteristics of various skin test devices will be reviewed with an emphasis on sensitivity, specificity, and variability of skin-prick testing devices. Significant statistical differences exist between all devices tested and reported in the literature. Whether these statistical differences equate to clinical differences is not known. With this review the practicing allergist should carefully evaluate multiple different devices and choose a device that suits their practice needs. In addition, allergists must ensure that technicians are sufficiently trained on the correct use of their device and should conduct continuing education to ensure that proper skin testing techniques are being used in their practice. Finally, the use of skin testing in pediatrics will be reviewed with a focus on safety. Care should be taken when skin testing infants < or = 6 months of age, especially in the setting of eczema and a family history of atopy.

No test for assessing cellular immune response in coccidioidomycosis is currently available in the United States. In the present study, we tested 49 healthy subjects living in the coccidioidal endemic region with a 1:55.8 dilution of a single lot of coccidioidin archived since the 1970s. In this group, 23 evaluable subjects demonstrated >/=5 mm of induration at 24, 48 or 72 h, with a mean+/-SEM maximum induration of 18.4+/-4.0 mm. The induration results among 14 subjects reactive at 24 h were compared to those from 179 individuals in an historical cohort studied in the 1980s using a reference lot of coccidioidin. Results were within 5% and not significantly different (P=0.924). The maximum induration response of all evaluable subjects correlated significantly with the results of in vitro tests of coccidioidal cellular immunity using supernatant interferon-gamma concentration and CD69 expression on T cells (Spearman rank correlation coefficients 0.69 and 0.68, respectively; P<0.01 for both). These data suggest that archived coccidioidin retains its potency and specificity and that in vitro test of coccidioidal immunity may have utility in the measurement of coccidioidal cellular immunity.

Prick-tests to foods are usually carried out as the first step in the diagnosis of food allergy. Severe anaphylaxis accounts for 4.9 % of allergies in children and occurs more frequently in adults, raising the possibility of systemic reactions to prick-tests in highly sensitized people. Several studies published in the literature have used commercial extracts. As for airborne allergens, concentrations causing a skin reaction of 15 mm do not present a risk of systemic reactions. Prick-tests to native foods--prick-in-prick tests--have been less extensively studied. The CICBAA1 data, from 1,138 food allergic patients of all ages, cover 34,905 prick-in-prick tests to foods. The wheal of these prick-tests has been regulary registered. The risk of systemic reactions can be evaluated at 0.008 %. There were no severe reactions and anti-histamine and corticosteroid therapy were sufficient. These results are similar to those of the large study in 2000 carried out by Devenney in neonates (0.005%). A review of the literature reveals only a few severe reactions in adults. The authors draw attention to the necessary precautions: temporary contra-indication for skin prick-tests in children and adults with grade 3 or 4 asthma, with particular attention to such foods as all kinds of nuts, fish, etc.

Aim: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy images various neoplastic, granulomatous, and auto-immune diseases. Cat-scratch disease in an infectious granulomatous disease usually affecting the lymphnodes. It is not known whether cat-scratch disease provides positive somatostatin receptor scintigrams., Patients, Methods: Twelve patients with lymphadenitis and suspected cat-scratch disease were investigated by immunofluorescence antibody testing and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Suppurated lymphnodes were extracted or drained and Bartonella henselae specific PCR was then performed., Results: Eleven of 12 patients showed IgG antibodies against B. henselae. SRS showed positive scintigraphic results in 6 of 11 patients with CSD. B. henselae DNA was detected in tissue of lymphnodes from 4 of 5 patients with lymphnode extraction or lymphnode drainage. SRS demonstrated positive scintigrams in all patients with a positive PCR. In one patient with suspected CSD SRS was negative as well as antibody testing., Conclusion: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy correlated with positive Bartonella henselae specific PCR tests and positive Bartonella henselae specific antibody tests in patients with CSD.

It has been over a century since allergy skin testing and immunotherapy were first utilized. Both have withstood the test of time and numerous challenges such as cromolyn, antihistamines, and leukotriene modifiers that have threatened to make them obsolete, to continue to play a prominent role in the diagnosis and treatment of the allergic patient. Considerable advances in the understanding of immunotherapy mechanisms and effective allergen dosing as well as improved extract quality have been made in recent years. However, there appears to be a lag in the widespread implementation of these advances into clinical practice, where a broad wide range of practice patterns exists. The wide diversity of allergy practice patterns is likely because of the absence of a uniform curriculum in allergy and immunology training programs. Recently, practice parameters have been developed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology' Immunotherapy Committee and the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, an organization that represents the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, aimed at promoting a consistent, objective scientific approach to allergy skin testing and immunotherapy. Standardized allergy skin test and immunotherapy forms were designed to incorporate these guidelines. The following article summarizes the recommendations of the practice parameters and reviews some of the clinical evidence that lends support to these guidelines, which are intended to enhance the safety and efficacy of allergy skin testing and immunotherapy.

Skin testing is a common diagnostic procedure in food allergy, but the final diagnosis of food allergy is based on the clinical response to food challenge. We studied the value of the skin prick-prick test (SPT), skin application food test (SAFT) and atopy patch test (APT) with fresh egg extract in diagnosing egg allergy. Ten clinically egg-allergic children with atopic dermatitis (AD; age 10 months to 8.4 yr, mean 3.4 yr) and 10 egg-tolerant children with and 10 without AD (age 2.4-11 yr, mean 5.5 yr) participated. In SAFT several false-negative reactions were seen, whereas all clinically egg-allergic children were positive in SPT and 40-60% in APT. In APT and in SPT false-positive reactions to egg were observed. In this study comprising a small number of patients including control subjects, neither SAFT nor APT with fresh whole egg extract were able to increase the diagnostic accuracy in detecting egg-allergic children with AD compared with SPT.

Background: Fatal reactions associated with skin testing and injection immunotherapy have not been surveyed in North America since 1989., Objective: A survey of fatal reactions related to skin testing and immunotherapy and of near-fatal immunotherapy reactions that transpired from 1990 through 2001 was conducted among member practices of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology., Methods: A short survey of fatal reactions was sent to all American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology physicians, and an 87-item follow-up detailed questionnaire was sent to those reporting fatal reactions., Results: Of 2404 members, 646 (25%) responded to the short survey. There were 20 fatal immunotherapy reactions that were directly reported and 21 indirectly reported cases by local physicians. There were 273 (42% of the responding sample) reports of near-fatal reactions. It was estimated that fatal reactions occurred every 1 per 2.5 million injections, with an average of 3.4 deaths per year. One fatality was confirmed after skin prick testing with multiple food allergens. Of 17 fatal deaths described in long questionnaires, 15 were in asthmatic patients, the majority of whose symptoms were not optimally controlled. Three reactions occurred in a medically unsupervised setting. None were receiving beta-blockers, and one was taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Most fatal reactions (59%) occurred with maintenance allergen doses. The onset of 3 reactions began more than 30 minutes after injections, with a significant delay in starting epinephrine. Epinephrine was not administered in 3 other fatal reactors., Conclusions: Fatal reactions to immunotherapy injections occurred at similar rates reported in previous surveys. Certain clinical practices have improved (ie, exclusion of beta-blockers), and dosing errors were infrequent. Fatal reactions to immunotherapy often occur in settings inappropriate for optimal treatment of anaphylaxis. Strict adherence to practice guidelines might prevent or minimize future fatal reactions.

Background: Allergy to tree nuts, like hazelnuts, ranks among the most frequently observed food allergies. These allergies can start at early childhood and are, in contrast to other food allergies, not always outgrown by the patient. Tree nut allergy is frequently associated with severe reactions. Diagnosis partially relies on in vivo testing by means of a skin prick test (SPT) using commercially available SPT reagents., Methods: Protein and allergen composition of nine commercial SPT solutions was evaluated using standard protein detection methods and specific immunoassays for measurement of five individual allergens. Diagnostic performance was assessed by SPT in 30 hazelnut-allergic subjects, of which 15 were provocation proven., Results: Protein concentrations ranged from 0.2-14 mg/ml. SDS-PAGE/silver staining revealed clear differences in protein composition. The major allergen Cor a 1 was present in all extracts but concentrations differed up to a factor 50. An allergen associated with severe symptoms, Cor a 8 (lipid transfer protein), was not detected on immunoblot in three products, and concentrations varied by more than a factor 100 as was shown by RAST inhibition. Similar observations were made for profilin, thaumatin-like protein and a not fully characterized 38-kD allergen. Ratios of individual allergens were variable among the nine extracts. SPT showed significant difference, and 6/30 patients displayed false-negative results using 3/9 products., Conclusion: Variability in the composition of products for the diagnosis of hazelnut allergy is extreme. Sometimes, allergens implicated in severe anaphylaxis are not detected by immunoblotting. These shortcomings in standardisation and quality control can potentially cause a false-negative diagnosis in subjects at risk of severe reactions to hazelnuts., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Objective: We sought to determine the effect of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, on intradermal skin testing. Study design and setting We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in a university setting., Methods: After a 1-week washout of allergy pharmacotherapy, intradermal skin testing was performed on 23 atopic subjects. Whealing size was measured 20 minutes after injection. Subjects then began a 1-week regimen of daily loratadine, montelukast, or placebo. At 1 week, subjects again underwent intradermal skin testing. The change in wheal size was then calculated from baseline., Results: A significant difference (P < 0.05) between the montelukast and loratadine groups in suppression of intradermal whealing at 1 week was observed. No significant difference was noted between the montelukast and placebo subjects., Conclusions: Montelukast demonstrated no significant suppression of skin whealing after antigen challenge over placebo., Significance: Montelukast does not need to be discontinued before intradermal allergy testing.

Background: Concerns for sensitization after penicillin skin testing are a factor in limiting the timing and population for whom this testing is offered. The sensitizing potential of the penicillin skin test has never been studied directly., Methods: A total of 329 volunteers underwent prick and intradermal skin testing with penicillin G, benzylpenicilloyl-polylysine, and a minor determinant mixture. Those with negative skin testing had repeat testing 4 weeks later. Medical history and antibiotic use were determined by interview, questionnaire, and electronic pharmacy records., Results: Seventy-two of the 329 subjects (22%) reported a history of previous beta-lactam reaction, of which 10 (14%) had a positive initial skin test. Overall, the initial skin test was positive in 23 of 329 (7%). Of the subjects with a negative initial skin test, 239 completed the second test 4 weeks later. Of these, 6 subjects (2.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.5% to 4.5%) converted to a positive skin test. None had taken a beta-lactam antibiotic between the two tests, and none had any previous history of beta-lactam reaction. One subject reported having never taken a beta-lactam antibiotic before. In comparison to the 233 subjects who did not convert their skin test, the statistically significant factors favoring sensitization were: female sex (odds ratio [OR] 6.53, P = 0.05), atopy (OR 5.31, P = 0.04), and history of food allergy (OR 6.35, P = 0.02). There was a trend toward more recent penicillin use in the newly sensitized subjects, but this was not statistically significant.., Conclusion: Penicillin skin testing may sensitize a small number of individuals to penicillin.

IgE-dependent allergy to muscle relaxants (MR) has an estimated prevalence of 1 out of 6500 General Anesthesias (GA). 62% of anaphylaxis during surgery are due to MR anaphylaxis. All the molecules are divalent, carrying two NH4+ epitopes (quaternary ammonium ions), either structurally or after rapid in vivo protonization (vecuronium). The excellent overall performance of skin test makes them the golden standard for the diagnosis of anaphylactoid reactions. Techniques include intradermal tests and prick-tests. The current localizations are the forearm and the back. Positivity criteria are 3 mm for prick-tests. For IDTs, the criterium is the doubling of the size of the injection papula, when 0.02 to 0.04 ml is injected: 8 mm. The recommended concentrations are not falsely negative. Commercial concentrations can be tested by prick tests, except for mivacurium and atracurium tested of 1:10 dilution. A scale of concentrations is advised for IDT starting with 1:10,000, up to a normally non reactive concentration that is: 100 micrograms/ml (succinylcholine), 200 micrograms/ml (gallamine), 10 micrograms/ml (atracurium), 2 micrograms/ml (mivacurium), 200 micrograms/ml (pancuronium), 400 micrograms/ml (vecuronium), 1,000 micrograms/ml (rocuronium), 200 micrograms/ml (cis atracurium). The specificity and sensitivity of the skin tests to MRs are greater than 95%. The reproducibility over years is 88%. The overall concordance of PT and IDR is 97%. Both types of tests can be used for the diagnosis. IDT have to be carried out for the search of the cross sensitization. 84% of patients do have cross sensitization to MRs but only 16% react to all MRs. The further use of MRs selected by negative IDTs has been proved to be safe.

This paper presents the case of an 8-year-old boy who developed an anaphylactic reaction after skin-prick testing (SPT). The tests were performed with commercial extracts and were strongly positive for dog and grass. The boy had no incidence of anaphylaxis reported in his history. At the time tests were performed, he had been admitted to the hospital because of persistent wheezing and had a dog at home for a few days. Although anaphylaxis is very rare after SPTs, these tests should always be peformed in a place equipped to treat anaphylaxis.

Objective: The frequency and severity of systemic reaction (SR) from skin test (ST) and specific immunotherapy (SIT) in Mexico, have not been published before. In order to know that frequency and severity, a prospective study was performed in the Allergy Clinic at General Hospital of Matamoros from August, 1991 to July, 1996. SR from ST and SIT were monitored. Symptoms were recorded with respect to the time of onset, involvement of respiratory tract or skin and presence of hypotension., Results: 65,397 injections were given to 1,149 patients; there were 25 SR in 20 patients (1:2,615 injections or 1:57 patients). Time of onset was between 10 and 30 minutes. SR were present more frequently during maintenance. There was a 3:1 rate in female patients and a predominance in the 15 to 24 age group., Conclusions: In Matamoros, Tamps., Mexico, frequency and severity of SR from ST and SIT is not different from published data. Small children are not in higher risk. Immunotherapy is a safe therapeutic procedure on expert hands.

Background: Duplicate skin prick testing has previously been recommended because of reports that accidental negative tests are common. However, duplicate tests also mean an extra allergen load, which may increase the risk of inducing a generalized reaction at the test situation, at least in the youngest infants., Objective: To investigate whether the occurrence of both a positive and negative test result is a common feature when performing duplicate skin prick tests and can therefore justify the duplicate method., Methods: A retrospective analysis of all skin prick tests performed in duplicate at the pediatric clinic at University Hospital in Linköping, Sweden, in 1997., Results: Of 1,087 skin prick tests, 14 resulted in one positive and one negative test, or 1.3%. The corresponding figure in the youngest age group, (ie, <2 years of age) was 3 of 340 (0.9%)., Conclusions: Considering the risk of inducing a summation of the reactions, and thereby a generalized allergic reaction, when applying an extra allergen load on the limited surface of the small arm, we conclude that the results of this study justify using single prick test, at least in the youngest age group and probably when testing children of all ages.